Architecture

The second half of the 17th century is the time of the highest flowering of French classicism architecture.

One of the reasons for the leading importance of architecture among other art forms in the second half of the 17th century was rooted in its specific features. It was architecture with the monumental character of its forms and longevity that could most forcefully express the ideas of a centralized national monarchy in its period of maturity. In this era, the social role of architecture, its ideological significance and organizing role in the artistic synthesis of all types of fine, applied and landscape gardening arts were especially clearly manifested.

The organization of the Academy of Architecture, whose director was appointed the prominent architect and theorist Francois Blondel (1617 - 1686), had a great influence on the development of architecture. Its members were the outstanding French architects L. Briand, J. Guittar, A. Le Nôtre, L. Levo, P. Mignard, J. Hardouin-Mansart and others. The task of the Academy was to develop the main aesthetic norms and criteria of classicism architecture, which should guide the architects.

The development of the economy and trade caused intensive construction in the second half of the 17th century of new and further expansion of old French cities. Marshal and military fortifier Sebastian Vauban built more than thirty new fortified cities and reconstructed about three hundred old ones. Among them, the cities of Longwy, Vitry-le-Francois and the city of Neuf-Brisac were built anew and had the shape of a square and an octagon, surrounded by walls, ditches and bastions. Their internal layout was a geometrically correct system of streets and quarters with a square in the center.

Port cities of Brest, Rochefort, Lorian and on the Mediterranean Sea - Seth are being built on the Atlantic coast. At the country royal residence, the city of Versailles begins to be built.

In 1676, the architects Bullet and Blondel draw up a plan for the expansion of Paris, so that the appearance of the capital would correspond to the splendor and grandeur of the monarchy of Louis XIV. The expansion of the territory of Paris to the northwest was envisaged; on the site of ancient fortifications, landscaped "promenades" are being designed, which laid the foundation for the future Grand Boulevards. The main entrances to the city are decorated and architecturally fixed by the construction of gates in the form of triumphal arches: Saint-Denis, Saint-Martin, Saint-Bernard and Saint-Louis.

According to the projects of J. Hardouin-Mansart, new large ensembles of Vendôme and Victory squares dedicated to Louis XIV are being created. The architect L. Levo in 1664 completes the quadrangular, with a closed courtyard, composition of the Louvre with the construction of its northern, southern and eastern buildings. The eastern facade of the Louvre, created by C. Perrault, F. d ​​"Orbe and L. Levo, gives the final look to this wonderful ensemble. On the left bank of the Seine, almost as huge as the Louvre and the Tuileries, the Les Invalides complex with a vast green esplanade in front of it, completed by the construction of a magnificent rotunda church in its center, designed by J. Hardouin-Mansart.

Large-scale urban development work in Paris, mainly after the completion of previously established ensembles, undertaken by Colbert, significantly changed the appearance of the center of the capital, but on the whole turned out to be isolated from the system of medieval buildings with inclusions that were not organically connected with the system of highways and streets. In this approach to the composition of closed urban ensembles, the influence of urban planning principles of the Italian Baroque affected.

New large ensembles and squares were created at this time in other cities of France - in Tours, Pau, Dijon, Lyon, etc.

The peculiarities of the architecture of the middle and second half of the 17th century are reflected both in the huge volume of construction of large ceremonial ensembles, designed to glorify and glorify the ruling classes of the era of absolutism and the powerful monarch - the sun king Louis XIV, and in the improvement and development of the artistic principles of classicism.

In the second half of the 17th century, a more consistent application of the classical order system is observed: horizontal articulations prevail over vertical ones; high separate roofs constantly disappear and are replaced by a single roof, often masked by a balustrade; the volumetric composition of the building becomes simpler, more compact, corresponding to the location and size of the interior.

Along with the influence of the architecture of ancient Rome, the influence of the architecture of the Italian Renaissance and Baroque is increasing. This latter is reflected in the borrowing of certain baroque forms (crooked torn pediments, magnificent cartouches, volutes), in the principles of solving the interior space (enfilade), as well as in the increased complexity and pomposity of architectural forms, especially in interiors, where their synthesis with sculpture and painting is often bears in itself to a greater extent the features of baroque than classicism.

One of the works of architecture of the second half of the 17th century, in which the predominance of the mature artistic principles of classicism is already clearly felt, is the country ensemble of the palace and park of Vaux-le-Viscount near Melun (1655 - 1661).

The creators of this outstanding work, built for the general controller of finances Fouquet and in many respects anticipating the ensemble of Versailles, were the architect Louis Levo (c. 1612 - 1670), the master of landscape art Andre Le Nôtre, who planned the park of the palace, and the painter Charles Lebrun, who took part in interior decoration of the palace and ceiling painting.

According to the composition of the plan, the allocation of the central and corner tower-shaped volumes, crowned with high separate roofs, the general open character of the building - it is placed on an island surrounded by a moat filled with water - the palace of Vaux-le-Vicomte resembles Maisons-Laffite.

Nevertheless, in the structure and appearance of the building, as well as in the composition of the ensemble as a whole, there is undoubtedly a more consistent application of classic architectural principles.

This is manifested primarily in the logical and strictly calculated planning solution of the palace and the park as a whole. The large oval-shaped salon, which forms the central link of the suite of front rooms, became the compositional center not only of the palace, but of the ensemble as a whole, since its position at the intersection of the main planning axes of the ensemble (the main park alley running from the palace, and the transverse ones, coinciding with the longitudinal axis building) makes it the "focus" of the entire complex.

Thus, the building of the palace and the park are subject to a strictly centralized compositional principle, which makes it possible to bring the various elements of the ensemble to artistic unity and single out the palace as the main component of the ensemble.

The composition of the palace is characterized by the unity of the internal space and the volume of the building, which distinguishes the works of mature classicist architecture. The large oval saloon is highlighted in the volume of the building by a curvilinear risalit crowned with a powerful domed roof, creating a static and calm silhouette of the building. The introduction of a large order of pilasters, covering two floors above the basement, and a powerful horizontal of a smooth, strict classical entablature in profiles achieves the predominance of horizontal articulations over vertical ones in the facades, the integrity of order facades and volumetric composition, not characteristic of castles of an earlier period. All this gives the appearance of the palace a monumental representativeness and splendor.

In contrast to some restraint of forms in the external appearance of the palace, the interiors of the building received a rich and free architectural interpretation. In one of the most ceremonial rooms - the oval salon - a rather strict order of Corinthian pilasters that divide the wall, and arched openings and niches located between the pilasters are combined with the magnificently decorated second tier of the wall, with heavy baroque caryatids, garlands and cartouches. The interior space is illusoryly expanded by a favorite baroque technique - the introduction of mirrors in niches located opposite the windows. The prospects that open from the windows of cozy living rooms and salons to the surrounding landscape, to the space of the parterre and alleys of the park, are perceived as a kind of logical continuation of the interior space outside.

The Vaux-le-Vicomte park ensemble was created according to a strictly regular system. Skillfully trimmed green spaces, alleys, flower beds, paths form clear, easily perceived geometric volumes, planes and lines. Fountains and decorative statues frame the extensive parterre, spread out in front of the palace facade on terraces.

Among other buildings of Levo - country palaces, hotels and churches - the monumental building of the College of the Four Nations (1661 - 1665), created on the instructions of Cardinal Mazarin to educate natives of various provinces of France, stands out for its original composition and features of a mature classicist style. In the College of the Four Nations (now the building of the French Academy of Sciences), Levo develops the principles of classicist architecture in an urban ensemble. By locating the building of the College on the left bank of the Seine, Left opens the powerful, widely deployed semicircles of its main facade towards the river and the Louvre ensemble in such a way that the domed church, which is the center of the composition of the College, falls on the axis of the Louvre. This achieves the spatial unity of these large urban complexes, which form one of the outstanding ensembles of the center of Paris, connected by the riverbed.

In the architecture of the College building with its vast semicircle of the courtyard open to the Seine, the developed silhouette, the highlighting of the center of the composition, the dominant importance of which is emphasized by the enlarged divisions and forms of the entrance portal and the dome, the image of a public building of great national importance was successfully found. Based on the creative processing of the forms of palace and religious architecture, Levo creates the appearance of a public building with a domed compositional center, which served as a prototype for many state buildings in European architecture of the 18th - 19th centuries.

One of the works in which the aesthetic principles of French classicism and the canons developed by the Academy of Architecture were most fully expressed is the eastern facade of the Louvre (1667-1678), in the design and construction of which Claude Perrault (1613 - 1688), Francois d "Orbe participated (1634 - 1697) and Louis Le Vaux.

The eastern facade of the Louvre, which is often called the Louvre Colonnade, is part of the ensemble of two palaces united in the 17th century - the Tuileries and the Louvre. The façade of great length (173 m) has a central and two side risalits, between which powerful (12 m high) double columns of the Corinthian order rest on a monumental smooth plinth with rare window openings, supporting a high entablature and forming shaded loggias. The most rich in form, decor and articulations of the central entrance rizalit with a three-bay portico is crowned with a strict triangular pediment, antiqued in shape and proportions. The tympanum of the pediment is richly decorated with sculptural relief. The side risalits, which have a less rich plastic development, are dissected by double pilasters of the same order.

Francois d "Orbe, Louis Levo, Claude Perrault. East facade of the Louvre (Louvre Colonnade). 1667 - 1678

The flat architectural relief of the side projections creates a logical transition to the side facades of the Louvre, which repeat the composition of the eastern facade, with the difference that the double Corinthian columns are replaced in them by single pilasters of the same order.

In the simple and concise three-dimensional structure of the building, in the clear and logical division of the volume into carried and load-bearing parts, in the details and proportions of the Corinthian order close to the classical canon, and, finally, in the subordination of the composition to a strongly identified rhythmic order beginning, the mature artistic principles of the classic 17th century architecture. The monumental façade, with its enlarged forms and emphasized scale, is full of grandeur and nobility, but at the same time, it has a hint of academic coldness and rationality.

An important contribution to the theory and practice of French classicism was made by François Blondel (1617 - 1686). Among his best works is the triumphal arch, usually called the Porte Saint-Denis in Paris. The architecture of the monumental arch, erected to the glory of French weapons, in commemoration of the crossing of the Rhine by French troops in 1672, is distinguished by great conciseness, generalization of forms and emphasized splendor. Blondel's great merit lies in the deep creative processing of the type of Roman triumphal arch and the creation of a unique composition that had a strong influence on the architecture of such structures in the 18th and 19th centuries.

The problem of the architectural ensemble, which had been in the center of attention of the masters of classicism of the 17th century for almost the entire century, found its expression in French urban planning. An outstanding innovator in this area is the largest French architect of the 17th century - Jules Hardouin-Mansart (1646 - 1708; from 1668 he bore the surname Hardouin-Mansart).

Built according to the designs of Hardouin-Mansart in Paris, Place Louis the Great (later Vendôme; 1685 - 1701) and Place des Victories (1684 - 1687) are very important for the urban planning practice of the second half of the 17th century. Having the shape of a rectangle with cut corners (146X 136 m), Place Louis the Great was conceived as a front building in honor of the king.

In accordance with the plan, the equestrian statue of Louis XIV by the sculptor Girardon, located in the center of the square, played a dominant role in the composition. The facades of the buildings forming the square, of the same type in composition, with slightly protruding porticos at the cut corners and in the central part of the buildings, serve as an architectural frame for the space of the square. Connected to the surrounding neighborhoods by only two short stretches of streets, the square is perceived as a closed, isolated space.

Another ensemble - Victory Square, which has the shape of a circle with a diameter of 60 m in plan - is close to Louis the Great Square in terms of the uniformity of the facades surrounding the square and the location of the monument in the center. In her compositional design - a circle with a statue in the center - the ideas of absolutism were even more pronounced. However, the placement of the square at the intersection of several streets associated with the general planning system of the city deprives its space of isolation and isolation. By creating Victory Square, Hardouin-Mansart laid the foundations for progressive urban planning trends in the construction of open public centers closely related to the planning system of the city, which were implemented in European urban planning in the 18th and first half of the 19th centuries. Another example of the skillful resolution of large urban planning tasks is the construction by Hardouin-Mansart of the Church of Les Invalides (1693 - 1706), which completes the huge complex built according to the project of Liberal Bruant (c. 1635 - 1697). The Les Invalides, designed to accommodate war veterans, is conceived as one of the most grandiose public buildings of the 17th century. In front of the main facade of the building, located on the left bank of the Seine, there is a vast square, the so-called Esplanade des Invalides, which, adjoining the river, seems to pick up and continue the development of the right-bank ensemble of the Tuileries and the Louvre in the left-bank part of the city. The strictly symmetrical complex of the Les Invalides consists of four-story buildings closed around the perimeter, forming a developed system of large rectangular and square courtyards, subordinate to a single compositional center - a large courtyard and a monumental domed church erected in its central part. By arranging a large compact volume of the church along the main, compositional axis of the complex of buildings spread out in breadth, Hardouin-Mansart created the center of the ensemble, subjugating all its elements and completing it with a common expressive silhouette.

The church is a monumental centric building with a square plan and a dome 27 m in diameter, crowning a vast central space. The proportions and order divisions of the church are restrained and strict. Originally conceived by the author is the under-dome space of the church with a floor deepened by several steps and three crowning domed shells. The lower one, with a large hole in the center, closes the light openings cut into the second domed shell, creating the illusion of an illuminated celestial sphere.

The dome of the Church of the Invalides is one of the most beautiful and highest domes in world architecture, which also has an important urban significance. Along with the domes of the Val de Grae church and the Pantheon built in the 18th century, it creates an expressive silhouette of the southern part of Paris.

The progressive tendencies in the architecture of classicism of the 17th century are fully and comprehensively developed in the ensemble of Versailles (1668 - 1689), grandiose in scale, courage and breadth of artistic design. The main creators of this most significant monument of French classicism of the 17th century were the architects Louis Leveau and Hardouin-Mansart, the master of landscape art Andre Le Nôtre (1613 - 1700) and the artist Lebrun, who participated in the creation of the interiors of the palace.

The original idea of ​​the ensemble of Versailles, consisting of a city, a palace and a park, belongs to Levo and Le Nôtre. Both masters began to work on the construction of Versailles from 1668. In the process of implementing the ensemble, their plan has undergone numerous changes. The final completion of the ensemble of Versailles belongs to Hardouin-Mansart.

Versailles, as the main residence of the king, was supposed to exalt and glorify the boundless power of French absolutism. However, this does not exhaust the content of the ideological and artistic conception of the ensemble of Versailles, as well as its outstanding significance in the history of world architecture. Shackled by official regulations, forced to submit to the despotic demands of the king and his entourage, the builders of Versailles - a huge army of architects, artists, masters of applied and gardening art - managed to embody in it the enormous creative forces of the French people.

The peculiarities of the construction of the ensemble as a strictly ordered centralized system based on the absolute compositional dominance of the palace over everything around are due to its general ideological design. To the Palace of Versailles, located on a high terrace, three wide straight radial avenues of the city converge, forming a trident. The middle avenue continues on the other side of the palace in the form of the main alley of a huge park. Perpendicular to this main compositional axis of the city and the park is the building of the palace, strongly elongated in width. The middle avenue of the trident leads to Paris, the other two - to the royal palaces of Saint-Cloud and So, as if connecting the main country residence of the king with various regions of the country.

The Palace of Versailles was built in three periods: the most ancient part, framing the Marble Court, is the hunting castle of Louis XIII, begun construction in 1624 and later heavily rebuilt. In 1668 - 1671, Levo builds it with new buildings, facing the city along the axis of the middle beam of the trident. From the side of the Marble Court, the palace resembles the early buildings of French architecture of the 17th century with extensive court d'honneur, towers crowned with high roofs, fragmentation of forms and details. The construction is completed by Hardouin-Mansart, which in 1678-1687 further enlarges the palace by adding two buildings, southern and northern, each 500 m long, and from the side of the central part of the park facade - a huge Mirror Gallery 73 m long with side halls of War and Peace. Next to the Mirror Gallery, he placed the bedroom of the Sun King on the side of the Marble Court, where the axes of the trident of the city's avenue converge. In the central part of the palace and around the Marble Court, the apartments of the royal family and ceremonial reception halls were grouped. The huge wings housed the premises of the courtiers, the guards and the palace church.

The architecture of the facades of the palace, created by Hardouin-Mansart, especially from the side of the park, is distinguished by great stylistic unity. Strongly stretched in breadth, the building of the palace goes well with the strict, geometrically correct layout of the park and the natural environment. In the composition of the facade, the second, main floor is clearly distinguished with large-scale arched window openings and orders of columns and pilasters between them, strict in proportions and details, resting on a heavy rusticated plinth. The heavy attic floor crowning the building imparts monumentality and representativeness to the appearance of the palace.

The premises of the palace were distinguished by luxury and a variety of decorations. They widely used baroque motifs (round and oval medallions, complex cartouches, ornamental fillings above the doors and in the walls) and expensive finishing materials (mirrors, chased bronze, marble, gilded wood carvings, precious woods), extensive use of decorative painting and sculpture - all this is calculated on the impression of stunning splendor. The reception halls were dedicated to the ancient gods: Apollo, Diana, Mars, Venus, Mercury. Their decoration reflected the symbolic meaning of these rooms, associated with the glorification of the virtues and virtues of the king and his family. During balls and receptions, each of the halls served certain purposes - a place for banquets, games of billiards or cards, a concert hall, a music salon. In the hall of Apollo, which surpassed the rest in luxury, there was a royal throne - a very high chair made of cast silver under a canopy. But the largest and most ceremonial room of the palace is the Mirror Gallery. Here, through wide arched openings, a magnificent view of the main alley of the park and the surrounding landscape opens up. The inner space of the gallery is illusoryly expanded by a number of large mirrors located in niches opposite the windows. The interior of the gallery is richly decorated with marble Corinthian pilasters and a magnificent stucco cornice, which serves as a transition to the huge ceiling of the painter Lebrun, even more complex in composition and color scheme.

The spirit of official solemnity reigned in the Versailles chambers. The rooms were luxuriously furnished. In the mirror gallery, thousands of candles were lit in shining silver chandeliers, and a noisy, colorful crowd of courtiers filled the palace suites, reflected in high mirrors. The Venetian ambassador, describing in his report from France one of the royal receptions in the Versailles Mirror Gallery, says that there "it was brighter than during the day" and "the eyes did not want to believe the unprecedented bright outfits, men in feathers, women in magnificent hairstyles." He likens this spectacle to a "sleep", "an enchanted kingdom".

In contrast to the architecture of the facades of the palace, which are not devoid of a somewhat Baroque representativeness, as well as the interiors overloaded with decorations and gilding, the layout of the Versailles Park, which is the most outstanding example of a French regular park, made by André Le Nôtre, is remarkable for its amazing purity and harmony of forms. In the layout of the park and the forms of its "green architecture" Le Nôtre is the most consistent exponent of the aesthetic ideal of classicism. He saw the natural environment as an object of intelligent human activity. Le Nôtre transforms the natural landscape into an impeccably clear, complete architectonic system based on the idea of ​​rationality and order.

A general view of the park opens from the side of the palace. From the main terrace, a wide staircase leads along the main axis of the composition of the ensemble to the Latona Fountain, then the Royal Alley, bordered by cut trees, leads to the Apollo Fountain with a vast oval pool.

The composition of the Royal Alley ends with a huge water surface of the cruciform canal stretching far to the horizon and then converging to the main beam, then diverging from it, the prospects of alleys, framed by clipped trees and bosquets. Le Nôtre gave the park a west-east orientation, so that in the rays of the rising sun reflected in the large canal and pools, it seems especially magnificent and radiant.

In organic unity with the layout of the park and the architectural appearance of the palace, there is a rich and varied sculptural decoration of the park.

The park sculpture of Versailles is actively involved in the formation of the ensemble. Sculptural groups, statues, herms and vases with reliefs, many of which were created by outstanding sculptors of their time, close the vistas of green streets, frame squares and alleys, form complex and beautiful combinations with various fountains and pools.

The park of Versailles, with its clearly expressed architectonic construction, richness and variety of forms of marble and bronze sculptures, foliage of trees, fountains, pools, geometrically clear lines of alleys and forms of lawns, flower beds, bosquets, resembles a large "green city" with an enfilade of various squares and streets . These "green enfilades" are perceived as a natural continuation and development of the inner space of the palace itself.

The architectural ensemble of Versailles was complemented by the building of the Grand Trianon (1687 - 1688) built in the park according to the project of Hardouin-Mansart - an intimate royal residence. A feature of this small, but monumental in appearance, one-story building is a free asymmetric composition; ceremonial living rooms, galleries and living quarters are grouped around small landscaped courtyards with fountains. The central entrance part of the Trianon is arranged as a deep loggia with paired columns of the Ionic order supporting the ceiling.

Both the palace and especially the park of Versailles with its wide promenades, abundance of water, easy visibility and spatial scope served as a kind of magnificent "stage platform" for the most diverse, extraordinarily colorful and magnificent spectacles - fireworks, illuminations, balls, ballet divertissements, performances, masquerade processions, and the canals - for walks and festivities of the pleasure fleet. When Versailles was being built and had not yet become the official center of the state, its "entertainment" function prevailed. In the spring of 1664, the young monarch, in honor of his mistress Louise de La Vallière, established a series of festivities under the romantic title of "The Delights of the Enchanted Island". In the beginning, there was still a lot of spontaneity and improvisation in these peculiar eight-day festivals, in which almost all kinds of arts participated. Over the years, the festivities took on an increasingly grandiose character, reaching their apogee in the 1670s, when a new favorite reigned in Versailles - the prodigal and brilliant Marquise de Montespan. In the stories of eyewitnesses, in many engravings, the fame of Versailles and its holidays spread to other European countries.

Chapter "The Art of France". Section "Art of the 17th century". General history of arts. Volume IV. Art of the 17th-18th centuries. Authors: V.E. Bykov (architecture), T.P. Kaptereva (fine arts); under the general editorship of Yu.D. Kolpinsky and E.I. Rotenberg (Moscow, Art State Publishing House, 1963)

In the 17th century, after a period of bloody civil wars and economic ruin, the French people faced the task of further national development in all areas of economic, political and cultural life. Under the conditions of an absolute monarchy - under Henry IV and especially in the second quarter of the 17th century. under Richelieu, the energetic minister of the weak-willed Louis XIII, the system of state centralization was laid down and strengthened. As a result of the consistent struggle against the feudal opposition, an effective economic policy and the strengthening of its international position, France achieved significant success, becoming one of the most powerful European powers.

The establishment of French absolutism was based on the brutal exploitation of the masses. Richelieu said that the people are like a mule, which is accustomed to carrying heavy things and spoils from a long rest more than from work. The French bourgeoisie, the development of which absolutism patronized with its economic policy, was in a dual position: it aspired to political domination, but due to its immaturity, it could not yet embark on the path of a break with royal power, to lead the masses, because the bourgeoisie was afraid of them and was interested in maintaining the privileges bestowed upon it by absolutism. This was confirmed in the history of the so-called parliamentary Fronde (1648-1649), when the bourgeoisie, frightened by the powerful upsurge of the people's revolutionary element, having committed a direct betrayal, compromised with the nobility.

Absolutism predetermined many characteristic features in the development of French culture in the 17th century. Scientists, poets, artists were attracted to the royal court. In the 17th century, grandiose palace and public buildings were erected in France, majestic urban ensembles were created. But it would be wrong to reduce all the ideological diversity of French culture of the 17th century. only to express the ideas of absolutism. The development of French culture, being associated with the expression of national interests, was of a more complex nature, including trends that were very far from official requirements.

The creative genius of the French people showed itself brightly and multifaceted in philosophy, literature and art. The 17th century gave France the great thinkers Descartes and Gassendi, the luminaries of dramaturgy Corneille, Racine and Molière, and in the plastic arts such great masters as the architect Hardouin-Mansart and the painter Nicolas Poussin.

Acute social struggle left a definite imprint on the entire development of French culture of that time. Public contradictions manifested themselves, in particular, in the fact that some leading figures of French culture found themselves in a state of conflict with the royal court and were forced to live and work outside of France: Descartes went to Holland, and Poussin spent almost his entire life in Italy. Official court art in the first half of the 17th century. developed mainly in the forms of pompous baroque. In the struggle against official art, two artistic lines developed, each of which was an expression of the advanced realistic tendencies of the era. The masters of the first of these directions, who received the name peintres de la realite from French researchers, that is, painters of the real world, worked in the capital, as well as in provincial art schools, and for all their individual differences were united by one common feature: avoiding ideal forms, they turned to the direct, immediate embodiment of the phenomena and images of reality. Their best achievements relate primarily to everyday painting and portraiture; biblical and mythological scenes were also embodied by these masters in images inspired by everyday reality.

But the most profound reflection of the essential features of the era manifested itself in France in the forms of the second of these progressive trends - in the art of classicism.

The specificity of various areas of artistic culture determined certain features of the evolution of this style in drama, poetry, architecture and the visual arts, but with all these differences, the principles of French classicism have a certain unity.

Under the conditions of the absolutist system, the dependence of a person on social institutions, on state regulation and class barriers should have been revealed with particular acuteness. In literature, in which the ideological program of classicism found its most complete expression, the theme of civic duty, the victory of the social principle over the personal principle, becomes dominant. Classicism opposes the imperfection of reality with the ideals of rationality and severe discipline of the individual, with the help of which the contradictions of real life must be overcome. The conflict of reason and feeling, passion and duty, characteristic of the dramaturgy of classicism, reflected the contradiction inherent in this era between a person and the world around him. Representatives of classicism found the embodiment of their social ideals in Ancient Greece and Republican Rome, just as ancient art was the personification of aesthetic norms for them.

Architecture, by its very nature most connected with the practical interests of society, found itself in the strongest dependence on absolutism. Only under the conditions of a powerful centralized monarchy was it possible at that time to create huge urban and palace ensembles made according to a single plan, designed to embody the idea of ​​the power of an absolute monarch. It is no coincidence, therefore, that the flowering of French classicist architecture dates back to the second half of the 17th century, when the centralization of absolutist power reached its peak.

On a slightly different plane, the development of classicism painting took place, the founder and main representative of which was the greatest French artist of the 17th century. Nicholas Poussin.

The artistic theory of painting of classicism, based on the conclusions of Italian theorists and the statements of Poussin, which in the second half of the 17th century turned into a consistent doctrine, ideologically has much in common with the theory of classic literature and dramaturgy. It also emphasizes the social principle, the triumph of reason over feeling, the importance of ancient art as an indisputable model. According to Poussin, a work of art should remind a person "of the contemplation of virtue and wisdom, with the help of which he will be able to remain firm and unshakable before the blows of fate."

In accordance with these tasks, a system of artistic means was developed, which was used in the fine arts of classicism, and a strict regulation of genres. The leading genre was the so-called historical painting, which included compositions on historical, mythological and biblical subjects. A step below were a portrait and a landscape. The genre of everyday life and still life were practically absent in the painting of classicism.

But Poussin, to a lesser extent than the French playwrights, was attracted to the formulation of the problems of the social existence of man, to the theme of civic duty. To a greater extent, he was attracted by the beauty of human feelings, reflections on the fate of a person, about his attitude to the world around him, the theme of poetic creativity. Particularly noteworthy is the importance of the theme of nature for the philosophical and artistic conception of Poussin. Nature, which Poussin perceived as the highest embodiment of rationality and beauty, is the living environment for his heroes, the arena of their action, an important, often dominant component in the figurative content of the picture.

For Poussin, ancient art was least of all the sum of canonical devices. Poussin captured the main thing in ancient art - its spirit, its vital basis, the organic unity of high artistic generalization and a sense of the fullness of being, figurative brightness and great social content.

Creativity Poussin falls on the first half of the century, marked by the rise of social and artistic life in France and active social struggle. Hence the general progressive orientation of his art, the richness of its content. A different situation developed in the last decades of the 17th century, during the period of the greatest intensification of absolutist oppression and the suppression of progressive phenomena of social thought, when centralization spread to artists united in the Royal Academy and forced to serve with their art the glorification of the monarchy. Under these conditions, their art lost its deep social content, and the weak, limited features of the classic method came to the fore.

In the first half and the middle of the 17th century, the principles of classicism gradually took shape and began to take root in French architecture. The ground for them was prepared by the architects of the French Renaissance. But in the same period in the French architecture of the 17th century. there are still traditions dating back to the Middle Ages, and then organically assimilated by Renaissance architects. They were so strong that even classical orders acquired a peculiar interpretation in the buildings of the first half of the century. The composition of the order - its location on the surface of the wall, proportions and details - obey the principles of wall construction that have developed in Gothic architecture, with its clearly defined vertical elements of the building frame (walls) and large window openings. Half-columns and pilasters, filling the piers, are grouped in pairs or bundles; this motif, combined with numerous rake-outs and a tiered construction of the facade, gives the building an increased vertical aspiration, which is unusual for the classical system of order compositions. To the traditions inherited by French architecture of the first half of the 17th century. from previous eras, one should also include the division of the building into separate tower-shaped volumes, crowned with pyramidal roofs directed upwards. The compositional techniques and motifs of the Italian Baroque, which were used mainly in interior design, had a noticeable influence on the formation of the architecture of early classicism.

One of the early palace buildings of the first half of the 17th century. was the Luxembourg Palace in Paris (1615-1620/21), built by Salomon de Bros (after 1562-1626).

The composition of the palace is characterized by the placement of the main and service, lower outbuildings around the vast front courtyard (court d'honneur). One side of the main building faces the courtyard, the other - to the vast garden. In the three-dimensional composition of the palace, the characteristic for the French palace architecture of the first half of the 17th century was clearly manifested. traditional features, for example, the allocation of corner and central tower-like volumes in the main three-story building of the palace, crowned with high roofs, as well as the division of the internal space of the corner towers into completely identical residential sections.

The appearance of the palace, in some features of which there is still a resemblance to the castles of the previous century, thanks to a regular and clear compositional construction, as well as a clear rhythmic structure of two-tier orders that divide the facades, is distinguished by monumentality and representativeness.

The massiveness of the walls is emphasized by horizontal rustication, completely covering the walls and order elements.

Among other works of de Bros, a prominent place is occupied by the facade of the church of Saint Gervais (begun in 1616) in Paris. In this building, the traditional composition of the facade of Italian Baroque churches is combined with the gothic elongation of proportions.

By the first half of the 17th century. include early examples of large ensemble solutions. The creator of the first ensemble of the palace, park and city of Richelieu in the architecture of French classicism (begun in 1627) was Jacques Lemercier (c. 1585-1654).

The composition of the now defunct ensemble was based on the principle of the intersection of two main axes at right angles. One of them coincides with the main street of the city and the park alley connecting the city with the square in front of the palace, the other is the main axis of the palace and the park. The layout of the park is built on a strictly regular system of alleys intersecting at right angles or diverging from one center.

Set aside from the palace, the city of Richelieu was surrounded by a wall and a moat, forming a general plan in the shape of a rectangle. The layout of the streets and quarters of the city is subject to the same strict system of rectangular coordinates as the ensemble as a whole, which indicates the addition in the first half of the 17th century. new urban planning principles and a decisive break with the spontaneously formed layout of a medieval city with its crooked and narrow streets, small cramped squares, crowded and chaotic buildings. The building of the Richelieu Palace was divided into the main building and outbuildings, which formed in front of it a large enclosed rectangular courtyard with a main entrance. The main building with outbuildings, according to a tradition dating back to medieval and renaissance castles, was surrounded by a moat filled with water. The layout and volumetric composition of the main building and outbuildings with clearly defined tower-shaped corner volumes were close to the Luxembourg Palace discussed above.

In the ensemble of the city and the palace of Richelieu, some parts were still not sufficiently imbued with unity, but on the whole, Lemercier managed to create a new type of complex and strict spatial composition, unknown to the architecture of the Italian Renaissance and Baroque.

An outstanding work of architecture of the first half of the 17th century. there was another Lemercier building - the Clock Pavilion (begun in 1624), which forms the central part of the western facade of the Louvre. The composition of this façade, remarkable in proportions and details, was due to its organic connection with the façade of the Louvre erected by Lesko in the 16th century - one of the best examples of the French Renaissance. Skillfully combining the architecture of the strict and at the same time plastically saturated facades of the pavilion with the richly decorated order and sculptural inserts of the facade of Lescaut, Lemercier gives the pavilion a special impressiveness and monumentality. He erected a high fourth floor above the third, attic floor, crowned with a system of baroque in combination, but classical in detail, pediments supported by paired caryatids, and completed the volume of the pavilion with a powerful domed roof.

Along with Lemercier, the largest architect of the first half of the century was Francois Mansart (1598-1666). Among his outstanding works is the country palace of Maisons-Laffitte (1642-1650), built not far from Paris. Unlike the traditional scheme of earlier city and country palaces, there is no closed courtyard formed by service wings. All office space is located on the ground floor of the building. Arranged in the form of the letter P, open and easily visible from all four sides, the monumental building of the palace, crowned with high pyramidal roofs, is notable for its compositional integrity and expressive silhouette. The building is surrounded by a moat filled with water, and its location, as it were, on an island in a beautiful water frame, well connected the palace with the natural environment, emphasizing its dominance in the composition of the ensemble.

In contrast to earlier palaces, the interior space of the building is characterized by great unity and is conceived as a system of interconnected ceremonial halls and living rooms of various shapes and architectural decoration with balconies and terraces overlooking the park and courtyard-garden. In the strictly ordered construction of the interior, the features of classicism are already clearly manifested. Residential and service premises located on the first and third floors (and not in the side tower-shaped volumes, as, for example, in the Luxembourg Palace), do not violate the spatial unity of the building's interiors, front and solemn. The system of division of floors applied by Mansart with a strict Doric order on the first floor and a lighter Ionic order on the second is a masterful attempt to bring new classic and old traditional architectural forms to a stylistic unity.

Another major work of Francois Mansart - the church of Val de Grae (1645-1665) was built according to his project after his death. The composition of the plan was based on the traditional scheme of a domed basilica with a wide central nave, covered with a cylindrical vault, and a dome on the middle cross. As in many other French religious buildings of the 17th century, the facade of the building goes back to the traditional scheme of the church facade of the Italian Baroque. The church is crowned with a dome raised on a high drum, one of the highest domes in Paris.

Thus, in the first half of the 17th century. the process of maturation of a new style begins and conditions are being prepared for the flourishing of French architecture in the second half of the century.

At the beginning of the 17th century, after the period of civil wars and the well-known decline in cultural life associated with them, in the visual arts, as in architecture, one could observe the struggle between the remnants of the old and the sprouts of the new, examples of following inert traditions and bold artistic innovation.

The most interesting artist of this time was the engraver and draftsman Jacques Callot (c. 1592-1635), who worked in the first decades of the 17th century. He was born in Nancy, in Lorraine, as a young man he went to Italy, where he lived first in Rome, and then in Florence, where he remained until his return to his homeland in 1622.

A very prolific master, Callot created over one thousand five hundred prints, extremely diverse in their themes. He had to work at the French royal court and the ducal courts of Tuscany and Lorraine. However, the brilliance of court life did not obscure from him - a subtle and sharp observer - the diversity of the surrounding reality, full of sharp social contrasts, replete with cruel military upheavals.

Kallo is an artist of the transitional era; the complexity and inconsistency of his time explain the contradictory features in his art. Remnants of mannerism are still noticeable in Callo's works - they affect both the artist's worldview and his pictorial techniques. At the same time, Callot's work provides a vivid example of the penetration of new, realistic tendencies into French art.

Callo worked in the etching technique, which he perfected. Usually, the master used repeated etching when engraving, which allowed him to achieve special clarity of lines and hardness of the pattern.

Elements of fantasy are still strong in the works of Callo of the early period. They are expressed in the desire for bizarre plots, for exaggerated grotesque expressiveness; the skill of the artist sometimes takes on the character of self-sufficing virtuosity. These features are especially pronounced in the series of engravings of 1622 - "Bally" ("Dances") and "Gobbi" ("Hunchbacks"), created under the influence of the Italian comedy of masks. Works of this kind, still largely superficial, testify to the artist's somewhat one-sided search for external expressiveness. But in other series of engravings, realistic tendencies are already more clearly expressed. Such is the whole gallery of types that the artist could directly see on the streets: townspeople, peasants, soldiers (series "Caprici", 1617), gypsies (series "Gypsies", 1621), vagabonds and beggars (series "Beggars", 1622). These small figures, made with exceptional sharpness and observation, have extraordinary mobility, sharp character, expressive postures and gestures. With virtuoso artistry Kaldo conveys the elegant ease of a cavalier (series "Caprici"), a clear rhythm of dance in the figures of Italian actors and their antics (series "Balli"), the ponderous stiffness of the provincial aristocracy (series "Lorraine nobility"), old figures in rags (series "Beggars").

The most meaningful in the work of Callot are his multi-figured compositions. Their themes are very diverse: this is an image of court festivities (“Tournament in Nancy”, 1626), fairs (“Fair in Imprunet”, 1620), military triumphs, battles (panorama “Siege of Breda”, 1627), hunts (“Great Hunt” , 1626), scenes on mythological and religious subjects ("The Martyrdom of St. Sebastian", 1632-1633). In these relatively small sheets, the master creates a broad picture of life. Callot's engravings are panoramic; the artist looks at what is happening as if from afar, which allows him to achieve the widest spatial coverage, to include in the image huge masses of people, numerous diverse episodes. Despite the fact that the figures (and even more so the details) in Callot's compositions are often very small in size, they are made by the artist not only with remarkable accuracy of the drawing, but also fully possess vitality and character. However, Callot's method was fraught with negative aspects; the individual characteristics of the characters, individual details often become elusive in the total mass of the numerous participants in the event, the main thing is lost among the secondary. It is not for nothing that they usually say that Callot looks at his scenes as if through inverted binoculars: his perception emphasizes the remoteness of the artist from the event depicted. This specific feature of Callot is not a formal device at all, it is naturally connected with his artistic worldview. Callo worked in an era of crisis, when the ideals of the Renaissance had lost their power, and the new positive ideals had not yet established themselves. Callo's man is essentially powerless before external forces. It is no coincidence that the themes of some of Callo's compositions acquire a tragic coloring. Such, for example, is the engraving “The Martyrdom of St. Sebastian." The tragic beginning in this work lies not only in its plot decision - the artist presented numerous shooters, calmly and prudently, as if at a target at a shooting range, firing arrows at Sebastian tied to a post - but also in that feeling of loneliness and powerlessness, which is expressed in showered with a cloud of arrows to a tiny, hardly distinguishable figure of a saint, as if lost in a vast boundless space.

Callot reaches its greatest poignancy in two series of Disasters of War (1632-1633). With merciless truthfulness, the artist showed the suffering that befell his native Lorraine, captured by the royal troops. The engravings of this cycle depict scenes of executions and robberies, the punishment of marauders, fires, war victims - beggars and cripples on the roads. The artist tells in detail about the terrible events. There is no idealization and sentimental pity in these images. Callo does not seem to express his personal attitude to what is happening, he seems to be an impassive observer. But in the very fact of an objective display of the disasters of war, there is a certain direction and progressive meaning in the work of this artist.

At an early stage of French absolutism in court art, the direction of the Baroque character was predominant. Initially, however, since there were no significant masters in France, the royal court turned to famous foreign artists. So, for example, in 1622, Rubens was invited to create monumental compositions that adorned the newly built Luxembourg Palace.

Gradually, along with foreigners, French masters began to advance. At the end of the 1620s. Simon Vouet (1590-1649) received the honorary title of "first painter of the king". For a long time, Vue lived in Italy, working on the murals of churches and on orders from patrons. In 1627 he was summoned by Louis XIII to France. Many of the murals created by Voue have not survived to our time and are known from engravings. He owns pompous compositions of religious, mythological and allegorical content, sustained in bright colorful colors. Examples of his work are "St. Charles Borromeo (Brussels), Bringing to the Temple (Louvre), Hercules Among the Gods of Olympus (Hermitage).

Voue created and led the official, court direction in French art. Together with his followers, he transferred the techniques of Italian and Flemish Baroque to French monumental decorative painting. In essence, the work of this master was little independent. Voue's appeal to classicism in his later works was also reduced to purely external borrowings. Deprived of genuine monumentality and power, sometimes cloyingly sugary, superficial and beating on the external effect, the art of Vue and his followers was loosely connected with a living national tradition.

In the struggle against the official trend in the art of France, a new realistic trend was formed and strengthened - peintres de la realite ("painters of the real world"). The best masters of this trend, who turned in their art to a concrete image of reality, created humane, full of high dignity images of the French people.

At an early stage in the development of this trend, many of the masters adjoining it were influenced by the art of Caravaggio. For some, Caravaggio turned out to be an artist who largely predetermined their subject matter and the visual techniques themselves, while other masters were able to more creatively freely use the valuable aspects of the Caravaggist method.

Among the first of them belonged to Valentin (actually, Jean de Boulogne; 1594-1632). In 1614, Valentin arrived in Rome, where he carried out his activities. Like other caravagists, Valentin painted religious subjects, interpreting them in the spirit of the genre (for example, Peter's Denial; The Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts), but his large-figure genre compositions are best known. Depicting in them motifs traditional for caravaggism, Valentin strives for their sharper interpretation. An example of this is one of his best paintings - "Card Players" (Dresden, Gallery), where the drama of the situation is effectively beaten. The naivety of the inexperienced young man, the composure and self-confidence of the sharper playing with him, and the especially sinister appearance of his accomplice wrapped in a cloak, giving signs from behind the young man's back, are expressively shown. The contrasts of chiaroscuro in this case are used not only for plastic modeling, but also to enhance the dramatic tension of the picture.

Among the outstanding masters of his time is Georges de Latour (1593-1652). Famous in his time, he was later completely forgotten; the appearance of this master came to light only recently.

So far, the creative evolution of the artist remains largely unclear. The few biographical records of Latour that have survived are extremely sketchy. Latour was born in Lorraine near Nancy, then moved to the city of Luneville, where he spent the rest of his life. There is an assumption that in his youth he visited Italy. Latour was strongly influenced by the art of Caravaggio, but his work went far beyond simply following the techniques of Caravaggism; in the art of the Luneville master, the original features of the emerging national French painting of the 17th century found expression.

Latour painted mainly paintings on religious subjects. The fact that he spent his life in the provinces left its mark on his art. In the naivete of his images, in the shade of religious inspiration that can be caught in some of his works, in the emphasized static nature of his images and in the peculiar elementary nature of his artistic language, echoes of the medieval worldview still affect to some extent. But in his best works, the artist creates images of rare spiritual purity and great poetic power.

One of the most lyrical works of Latour is the painting "Nativity" (Rennes, Museum). It is distinguished by simplicity, almost avarice of artistic means and at the same time by deep truthfulness, with which a young mother is depicted, cradling her child with thoughtful tenderness, and an elderly woman who, carefully covering a burning candle with her hand, peers into the features of a newborn. Light in this composition is of great importance. Dispelling the darkness of the night, he singles out with plastic tangibility clear, to the limit generalized volumes of figures, faces of a peasant type and a touching figure of a swaddled child; under the action of light, deep, saturated with strong color tones of clothes light up. Its even and calm radiance creates an atmosphere of solemnity of night silence, broken only by the measured breathing of a sleeping child.

Close in its mood to the "Christmas" and the Louvre "Adoration of the Shepherds". The artist embodies the true image of the French peasants, the beauty of their simple feeling with captivating sincerity.

Latour's paintings on religious themes are often interpreted in the spirit of the genre, but at the same time they are devoid of a hint of triviality and everyday life. Such are the already mentioned "Nativity" and "Adoration of the Shepherds", "The Penitent Magdalene" (Louvre) and the genuine masterpieces of Latour - "St. Joseph the Carpenter" (Louvre) and "The Appearance of the Angel of St. Joseph ”(Nantes, Museum), where an angel - a slender girl - touches the hand of Joseph, dozing by the candle, with a gesture both powerful and gentle. The feeling of spiritual purity and calm contemplation in these works raises the images of Latour above everyday life.

The highest achievements of Latour include "St. Sebastian, mourned by St. Irina (Berlin). In the silence of the dead of night, illuminated only by the bright flame of a candle, the mournful figures of mourning women drooped over the prostrate body of Sebastian, pierced by arrows. Here the artist managed to convey not only the general feeling that unites all participants in the action, but also the shades of this feeling in each of the four mourners - numb stiffness, mournful bewilderment, bitter crying, tragic despair. But Latour is very restrained in showing suffering - he does not allow exaggeration anywhere, and the stronger the impact of his images, in which not so much faces as movements, gestures, the silhouettes of the figures themselves have acquired tremendous emotional expressiveness. New features are captured in the image of Sebastian. His beautiful sublime nudity embodies the heroic principle, which makes this image related to the creations of the masters of classicism.

In this picture, Latour moved away from the everyday coloring of images, from the somewhat naive elementality inherent in his earlier works. The former chamber coverage of phenomena, the mood of concentrated intimacy were replaced here by greater monumentality, a sense of tragic grandeur. Even Latour's favorite motif of a burning candle is perceived differently, more pathetically - its huge flame, carried upwards, resembles the flame of a torch.

An extremely important place in the realistic painting of France in the first half of the 17th century. takes the art of Louis Le Nain. Louis Le Nain, like his brothers Antoine and Mathieu, worked mainly in the field of the peasant genre. The depiction of the life of the peasants gives the works of Lenenov a bright democratic coloring. Their art was forgotten for a long time, and only from the middle of the 19th century. the study and collection of their works began.

The Le Nain brothers - Antoine (1588-1648), Louis (1593-1648) and Mathieu (1607-1677) were natives of the city of Lana in Picardy. They came from a petty-bourgeois family. The youth spent in their native Picardy gave them the first and most vivid impressions of rural life. Having moved to Paris, the Lenins remained alien to the noise and splendor of the capital. They had a common workshop, headed by the eldest of them - Antoine. He was also the direct teacher of his younger brothers. In 1648, Antoine and Louis Le Nain were admitted to the newly established Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture.

Antoine Le Nain was a conscientious but not very gifted artist. In his work, which was dominated by portrait work, there is still a lot of archaic; the composition is fragmented and frozen, the characteristics do not differ in variety (“Family Portrait”, 1642; Louvre). Antoine's art laid the foundation for the creative search of his younger brothers, and above all the largest of them - Louis Le Nain.

The early works of Louis Le Nain are close to those of his older brother. It is possible that Louis traveled to Italy with Mathieu. The Caravagist tradition had a certain influence on the formation of his art. Since 1640, Louis Le Nain manifests himself as a completely independent and original artist.

Georges de Latour depicted people from the people even in works on religious subjects. Louis Le Nain directly turned in his work to the life of the French peasantry. The innovation of Louis Lenain lies in a fundamentally new interpretation of the life of the people. It is in the peasants that the artist sees the best sides of a person. He treats his heroes with deep respect; his scenes of peasant life are filled with a sense of severity, simplicity and truthfulness, where majestically calm, modest, unhurried people act, full of dignity.

In his canvases, he unfolds the composition on a plane like a relief, arranging the figures within certain spatial boundaries. Revealed by a clear, generalized contour line, the figures are subject to a well-thought-out compositional design. An excellent colorist, Louis Le Nain subdues a restrained color scheme with a silvery tone, achieving softness and sophistication of colorful transitions and ratios.

The most mature and perfect works of Louis Le Nain were created in the 1640s.

The breakfast of a poor peasant family in the painting “Peasant Meal” (Louvre) is scanty, but what self-esteem these workers are imbued with, listening intently to the melody that the boy plays on the violin. Always restrained, little connected with each other by action, Lenin's characters are nevertheless perceived as members of a team united by a unity of mood, a common perception of life. Poetic feeling, soulfulness imbued with his painting "Prayer before dinner" (London, National Gallery); strictly and simply, without any hint of sentimentality, the scene of the visiting of an old peasant woman by her grandchildren is depicted in the Hermitage canvas “Visiting a Grandmother”; solemnly full of calm cheerfulness, the classically clear "Horseman's Stop" (London, Victoria and Albert Museum).

In the 1640s Louis Le Nain also creates one of his best works, The Milkmaid's Family (Hermitage Museum). Early misty morning; the peasant family goes to the market. With a warm feeling, the artist depicts these simple people, their open faces: a milkmaid who has grown old from work and deprivation, a tired peasant, a puffy-cheeked reasonable little boy and a sickly, fragile, serious girl beyond her years. Plastically finished figures stand out clearly against a light, airy background. The landscape is wonderful: a wide valley, a distant city on the horizon, a blue boundless sky shrouded in a silver haze. With great skill, the artist conveys the materiality of objects, their textural features, the dull radiance of a copper can, the hardness of stony soil, the roughness of simple homespun clothes of peasants, the shaggy wool of a donkey. The brushstroke technique is very diverse: smooth, almost enamel writing is combined with free, quivering painting.

The highest achievement of Louis Lenain can be called his Louvre "Forge". Usually Louis Le Nain depicted peasants during a meal, rest, entertainment; here, the scene of labor became the object of his image. It is remarkable that it was in labor that the artist saw the true beauty of man. We will not find images in the work of Louis Lenain that would be as full of strength and pride as the heroes of his "Forge" - a simple blacksmith surrounded by his family. There is more freedom, movement, sharpness in the composition; the former even, diffused lighting was replaced by contrasts of chiaroscuro, enhancing the emotional expressiveness of the images; there is more energy in the smear itself. Going beyond traditional plots, turning to a new topic contributed in this case to the creation of one of the earliest impressive images of labor in European fine art.

In the peasant genre of Louis Le Nain, imbued with a special nobility and a clear, as if purified perception of life, the sharp social contradictions of that time are not directly reflected. Psychologically, his images are sometimes too neutral: a sense of calm self-control, as it were, absorbs all the variety of experiences of his characters. Nevertheless, in the era of the most cruel exploitation of the masses, which brought the life of the French peasantry almost to the level of animal life, in the conditions of powerful popular protest growing in the depths of society, the art of Louis Le Nain, which affirmed human dignity, moral purity and moral strength of the French people, was of great progressive importance.

During the period of further strengthening of absolutism, the realistic peasant genre did not have favorable prospects for its development. This is confirmed by the example of the creative evolution of the youngest of the Lenins - Mathieu. Being younger than Louis by fourteen years, he, in essence, already belonged to another generation. In his art, Mathieu Le Nain gravitated towards the tastes of noble society. He began his career as a follower of Louis Le Nain ("Peasants in a Tavern"; Hermitage Museum). In the future, the subject and the whole character of his work change dramatically - Mathieu paints portraits of aristocrats and elegant genre scenes from the life of "good society".

A large number of provincial artists belonged to the “painters of the real world” direction, who, significantly inferior to such masters as Georges de La Tour and Louis Le Nain, managed to create lively and truthful works. These are, for example, Robert Tournier (1604 - 1670), the author of the strict and expressive painting "Descent from the Cross" (Toulouse, Museum), Richard Tassel (1580-1660), who painted a sharp portrait of the nun Catherine de Montolon (Dijon, Museum) , other.

In the first half of the 17th century realistic tendencies are also developing in the field of French portraiture. Philippe de Champaigne (1602 - 1674) was the greatest portrait painter of this time. Flemish by birth, he spent his whole life in France. Being close to the court, Champagne enjoyed the patronage of the king and Richelieu.

Champaigne began his career as a master of decorative painting, he also painted religious subjects. However, Champagne's talent was most widely revealed in the field of portraiture. He was a kind of historiographer of his time. He owns portraits of members of the royal house, statesmen, scientists, writers, representatives of the French clergy.

Among the works of Champaigne, the most famous portrait of Cardinal Richelieu (1636, Louvre). The cardinal is depicted in full growth; it seems to slowly pass in front of the viewer. His figure in a cardinal's robe with wide cascading folds is outlined in a clear and distinct outline against the background of brocade drapery. The rich tones of the pinkish-red mantle and the golden background set off the thin, pale face of the cardinal, his movable hands. For all its splendor, the portrait, however, is devoid of external bravura and is not overloaded with accessories. Its true monumentality lies in the feeling of inner strength and composure, in the simplicity of the artistic solution. Naturally, Champigne's portraits, devoid of a representative character, are even more rigorous and life-like. The best works of the master include the portrait of Arno d'Andilly (1650), located in the Louvre.

Both the artists of classicism and the “painters of the real world” were close to the advanced ideas of the era - a high idea of ​​​​the dignity of a person, the desire for an ethical assessment of his actions and a clear perception of the world, cleansed of all random. Because of this, both directions in painting, despite the differences between them, were in close contact with each other.

Classicism acquires a leading role in French painting from the second quarter of the 17th century. The work of its largest representative, Nicolas Poussin, is the pinnacle of French art of the 17th century.

Poussin was born in 1594 near the town of Andely in Normandy into a poor military family. Very little is known about Poussin's youthful years and his early work. Perhaps his first teacher was the wandering artist Kanten Varen, who visited Andeli during these years, meeting with whom was of decisive importance for determining the artistic vocation of the young man. Following Varen, Poussin secretly leaves his native city and leaves for Paris. However, this trip does not bring him luck. Only a year later, he again enters the capital and spends several years there. Already in his youth, Poussin reveals a great sense of purpose and an indefatigable thirst for knowledge. He studies mathematics, anatomy, ancient literature, gets acquainted with the engravings of the works of Raphael and Giulio Romane.

In Paris, Poussin meets the fashionable Italian poet Cavalier Marino and illustrates his poem Adonis. These illustrations that have survived to this day are the only reliable works of Poussin of his early Parisian period. In 1624 the artist left for Italy and settled in Rome. Although Poussin was destined to live almost his entire life in Italy, he passionately loved his homeland and was closely associated with the traditions of French culture. He was alien to careerism and not inclined to seek easy success. His life in Rome was devoted to persistent and systematic work. Poussin sketched and measured antique statues, continued his studies in science, literature, studied the treatises of Alberti, Leonardo da Vinci and Dürer. He illustrated one of the lists of Leonardo's treatise; At present, this most valuable manuscript is in the Hermitage.

Creative searches of Poussin in the 1620s. were very difficult. The master went a long way to create his own artistic method. Ancient art and Renaissance artists were the highest examples for him. Among contemporary Bolognese masters, he appreciated the most strict of them - Domenichino. Having a negative attitude towards Caravaggio, Poussin nevertheless did not remain indifferent to his art.

During the 1620s Poussin, having already embarked on the path of classicism, often sharply went beyond it. His paintings such as The Massacre of the Innocents (Chantilly), The Martyrdom of St. Erasmus ”(1628, Vatican Pinakothek), marked by features of proximity to caravagism and baroque, a well-known reduced images, an exaggeratedly dramatic interpretation of the situation. The Hermitage Descent from the Cross (c. 1630) is unusual for Poussin in its heightened expression in conveying a feeling of heartbreaking grief. The drama of the situation here is enhanced by the emotional interpretation of the landscape: the action unfolds against a stormy sky with reflections of a red, ominous dawn. A different approach characterizes his works, made in the spirit of classicism.

The cult of reason is one of the main qualities of classicism, and therefore none of the great masters of the 17th century. the rational principle does not play such an essential role as in Poussin. The master himself said that the perception of a work of art requires concentrated deliberation and hard work of thought. Rationalism is reflected not only in Poussin's purposeful adherence to the ethical and artistic ideal, but also in the visual system he created. He built a theory of so-called modes, which he tried to follow in his work. By modus, Poussin meant a kind of figurative key, the sum of devices of figurative-emotional characteristics and compositional-pictorial solutions that most corresponded to the expression of a particular theme. These modes Poussin gave names coming from the Greek names of various modes of the musical system. So, for example, the theme of a moral feat is embodied by the artist in strict severe forms, united by Poussin in the concept of "Dorian mode", themes of a dramatic nature - in the corresponding forms of the "Phrygian mode", joyful and idyllic themes - in the forms of "Ionian" and "Lydian" frets. The strong side of Poussin's works are the clearly expressed idea, clear logic, and a high degree of completeness of the idea achieved as a result of these artistic techniques. But at the same time, the subordination of art to certain stable norms, the introduction of rationalistic elements into it, also posed a great danger, since this could lead to the predominance of unshakable dogma, the deadening of the living creative process. This is exactly what all the academicians came to, following only the external methods of Poussin. Subsequently, this danger arose before Poussin himself.

One of the characteristic examples of the ideological and artistic program of classicism is Poussin's composition The Death of Germanicus (1626/27; Minneapolis, Institute of Arts). Here, the very choice of the hero is indicative - a courageous and noble commander, the stronghold of the best hopes of the Romans, who was poisoned by order of the suspicious and envious emperor Tiberius. The painting depicts Germanicus on his deathbed, surrounded by his family and warriors devoted to him, overwhelmed by a general feeling of excitement and grief.

Very fruitful for Poussin's work was the passion for the art of Titian in the second half of the 1620s. The appeal to the Titian tradition contributed to the disclosure of the most vital aspects of Poussin's talent. The role of Titian's colorism was also great in the development of Poussin's pictorial talent.

In his Moscow painting "Rinaldo and Armida" (1625-1627), the plot of which is taken from Tasso's poem "Jerusalem Liberated", the episode from the legend of medieval chivalry is interpreted rather as a motif of ancient mythology. The sorceress Armida, having found the sleeping crusader knight Rinaldo, takes him to her magical gardens, and the horses of Armida, dragging her chariot through the clouds and barely restrained by beautiful girls, look like the horses of the sun god Helios (this motif is later often found in Poussin's paintings). The moral height of a person is determined for Poussin by the correspondence of his feelings and actions to the reasonable laws of nature. Therefore, Poussin's ideal is a person living a single happy life with nature. The artist devoted such canvases of the 1620-1630s to this theme, such as “Apollo and Daphne” (Munich, Pinakothek), “Bacchanalia” in the Louvre and the London National Gallery, “The Kingdom of Flora” (Dresden, Gallery). He resurrects the world of ancient myths, where swarthy satyrs, slender nymphs and cheerful cupids are depicted in unity with beautiful and joyful nature. Never later in the work of Poussin did such serene scenes, such lovely female images appear.

The construction of paintings, where plastically tangible figures are included in the overall rhythm of the composition, has clarity and completeness. The always clearly found movement of the figures is especially expressive, this, according to Poussin, “body language”. The color scheme, often saturated and rich, also obeys a well-thought-out rhythmic ratio of colorful spots.

In the 1620s created one of the most captivating images of Poussin - the Dresden "Sleeping Venus". The motif of this painting - the image of the goddess immersed in a dream surrounded by a beautiful landscape - goes back to the samples of the Venetian Renaissance. However, in this case, the artist took from the masters of the Renaissance not the ideality of the images, but their other essential quality - a huge vitality. In Poussin's painting, the very type of the goddess, a young girl with a face turned pink from sleep, with a slender graceful figure, is full of such naturalness and some special intimacy of feeling that this image seems to be snatched straight from life. In contrast to the serene peace of the sleeping goddess, the thunderous tension of a hot day is felt even more strongly. In the Dresden canvas, more clearly than anywhere else, the connection between Poussin and the colorism of Titian is palpable. In comparison with the general brownish, saturated dark gold tone of the picture, the shades of the naked body of the goddess stand out especially beautifully.

The Hermitage painting Tancred and Erminia (1630s) is devoted to the dramatic theme of the love of the Amazonian Erminia for the crusader knight Tancred. Its plot is also taken from Tasso's poem. In a desert area, on stony ground, Tancred, wounded in a duel, is stretched out. With caring tenderness, he is supported by his faithful friend Vafrin. Erminia, having just dismounted, rushes to her lover and with a quick swing of a sparkling sword cuts off a strand of her blond hair in order to bandage his wounds. Her face, her gaze riveted on Tancred, the swift movements of her slender figure are inspired by a great inner feeling. The emotional elation of the image of the heroine is emphasized by the color scheme of her clothes, where contrasts of steel-gray and deep blue tones sound with increased strength, and the general dramatic mood of the picture finds its echo in the landscape filled with the flaming brilliance of the evening dawn. The armor of Tancred and the sword of Erminia reflect in their reflections all this richness of colors.

In the future, the emotional moment in Poussin's work turns out to be more connected with the organizing principle of the mind. In the works of the mid-1630s. the artist achieves a harmonious balance between reason and feeling. The image of a heroic, perfect man as the embodiment of moral greatness and spiritual strength acquires leading importance.

An example of a deeply philosophical disclosure of the theme in the work of Poussin is given by two versions of the composition “The Arcadian Shepherds” (between 1632 and 1635, Chesworth, collection of the Duke of Devonshire, see illustrations and 1650, Louvre). The myth of Arcadia, a country of serene happiness, was often embodied in art. But Poussin in this idyllic plot expressed a deep idea of ​​the transience of life and the inevitability of death. He imagined the shepherds, who suddenly saw a tomb with the inscription "And I was in Arcadia ...". At the moment when a person is filled with a feeling of cloudless happiness, he seems to hear the voice of death - a reminder of the fragility of life, of the inevitable end. In the first, more emotional and dramatic London version, the confusion of the shepherds is more pronounced, as if suddenly faced with death that invaded their bright world. In the second, much later Louvre version, the faces of the heroes are not even clouded, they remain calm, perceiving death as a natural pattern. This idea is embodied with particular depth in the image of a beautiful young woman, whose appearance the artist gave the features of stoic wisdom.

The Louvre painting "Inspiration of a Poet" is an example of how an abstract idea is embodied by Poussin in deep, powerful images. In essence, the plot of this work seems to border on allegory: we see a young poet crowned with a wreath in the presence of Apollo and the Muse, but least of all in this picture is allegorical dryness and far-fetchedness. The idea of ​​the picture - the birth of beauty in art, its triumph - is perceived not as an abstract, but as a concrete, figurative idea. Unlike common in the 17th century. allegorical compositions, the images of which are united externally and rhetorically, the Louvre painting is characterized by an internal unification of images by a common system of feelings, the idea of ​​the sublime beauty of creativity. The image of the beautiful muse in Poussin's painting brings to mind the most poetic female images in the art of classical Greece.

The compositional structure of the painting is in its way exemplary for classicism. It is distinguished by its great simplicity: the figure of Apollo is placed in the center, the figures of the muse and the poet are symmetrically located on both sides of it. But in this decision there is not the slightest dryness and artificiality; slight subtly found displacements, turns, movements of figures, a tree pushed aside, a flying cupid - all these techniques, without depriving the composition of clarity and balance, bring into it that sense of life that distinguishes this work from the conventionally schematic creations of academicians who imitated Poussin.

In the process of the formation of the artistic and compositional concept of Poussin's paintings, his wonderful drawings were of great importance. These sepia sketches, made with exceptional breadth and boldness, based on the juxtaposition of spots of light and shadow, play a preparatory role in turning the idea of ​​​​the work into a complete pictorial whole. Lively and dynamic, they seem to reflect all the richness of the artist's creative imagination in his search for a compositional rhythm and an emotional key that correspond to the ideological concept.

In subsequent years, the harmonic unity of the best works of the 1630s. is gradually lost. In Poussin's painting, the features of abstractness and rationality are growing. The brewing crisis of creativity sharply intensifies during his trip to France.

The glory of Poussin reaches the French court. Having received an invitation to return to France, Poussin in every possible way delays the trip. Only a coldly imperative personal letter from King Louis XIII makes him submit. In the autumn of 1640, Poussin leaves for Paris. A trip to France brings the artist a lot of bitter disappointment. His art met with fierce resistance from the representatives of the decorative Baroque trend, headed by Simon Vouet, who worked at the court. A network of dirty intrigues and denunciations of "these animals" (as the artist called them in his letters) entangles Poussin, a man of impeccable reputation. The whole atmosphere of court life inspires him with squeamish disgust. The artist, according to him, needs to break out of the noose that he put on his neck in order to again engage in real art in the silence of his studio, because, “if I stay in this country,” he writes, “I will have to turn into a mess, like others here." The royal court fails to attract a great artist. In the autumn of 1642, under the pretext of his wife's illness, Poussin leaves back for Italy, this time for good.

The work of Poussin in the 1640s marked by deep crisis. This crisis is explained not so much by the indicated facts of the artist's biography as, first of all, by the internal inconsistency of classicism itself. The living reality of that time was far from consistent with the ideals of rationality and civic virtue. The positive ethical program of classicism began to lose ground.

Working in Paris, Poussin could not completely abandon the tasks assigned to him as a court painter. The works of the Parisian period are of a cold, official character, they tangibly express the features of baroque art aimed at achieving an external effect (“Time saves Truth from Envy and Discord”, 1642, Lille, Museum; “The Miracle of St. Francis Xavier”, 1642, Louvre) . It was this kind of work that was subsequently perceived as a model by the artists of the academic camp, headed by Charles Le Brun.

But even in those works in which the master strictly adhered to the classicist artistic doctrine, he no longer reached the former depth and vitality of the images. Rationalism, normativity, the predominance of an abstract idea over feeling, the striving for ideality, characteristic of this system, receive a one-sidedly exaggerated expression in him. An example is the "Generosity of Scipio" Museum of Fine Arts. A. S. Pushkin (1643). Depicting the Roman commander Scipio Africanus, who renounced his rights to the captive Carthaginian princess and returned her to her fiancé, the artist glorifies the virtue of the wise commander. But in this case, the theme of the triumph of moral duty has received a cold, rhetorical incarnation, the images have lost their vitality and spirituality, the gestures are conditional, the depth of thought has been replaced by far-fetchedness. The figures seem to be frozen, the coloring is motley, with a predominance of cold local colors, the painting style is distinguished by an unpleasant slickness. Similar features are characterized by those created in 1644-1648. paintings from the second cycle of the Seven Sacraments.

The crisis of the classicist method affected primarily the plot compositions of Poussin. Already from the end of the 1640s. the highest achievements of the artist are manifested in other genres - in portrait and landscape.

By 1650, one of the most significant works of Poussin, his famous Louvre self-portrait, belongs. The artist for Poussin is first of all a thinker. In an era when the features of external representativeness were emphasized in the portrait, when the significance of the image was determined by the social distance separating the model from mere mortals, Poussin sees the value of a person in the strength of his intellect, in creative power. And in the self-portrait, the artist retains the strict clarity of compositional construction and the clarity of linear and volumetric solutions. The depth of the ideological content and remarkable completeness of Poussin's "Self-portrait" significantly exceeds the works of French portrait painters and belongs to the best portraits of European art of the 17th century.

Poussin's fascination with landscape is associated with change. his worldview. Undoubtedly, Poussin lost that integral idea of ​​a person, which was characteristic of his works of the 1620-1630s. Attempts to embody this idea in the plot compositions of the 1640s. led to failure. The figurative system of Poussin from the late 1640s. built on different principles. In the works of this time, the focus of the artist's attention is the image of nature. For Poussin, nature is the personification of the highest harmony of being. Man has lost his dominant position in it. He is perceived only as one of the many creations of nature, the laws of which he is forced to obey.

Walking in the vicinity of Rome, the artist, with his usual inquisitiveness, studied the landscapes of the Roman Campagna. His immediate impressions are conveyed in wonderful landscape drawings from nature, which are distinguished by an extraordinary freshness of perception and subtle lyricism.

The picturesque landscapes of Poussin do not have the same sense of immediacy that is inherent in his drawings. In his paintings, the ideal, generalizing principle is more strongly expressed, and nature appears in them as the bearer of perfect beauty and grandeur. Saturated with great ideological and emotional content, Poussin's landscapes belong to the highest achievements of the 17th-century painting. the so-called heroic landscape.

Poussin's landscapes are imbued with a sense of the grandeur and grandeur of the world. Huge heaps of rocks, clumps of lush trees, crystal clear lakes, cool springs flowing among stones and shady bushes are combined in a plastically clear, integral composition based on the alternation of spatial plans, each of which is located parallel to the plane of the canvas. The viewer's gaze, following the rhythmic movement, embraces the space in all its grandeur. The range of colors is very restrained, most often it is based on a combination of cold blue and bluish tones of the sky and water and warm brownish-gray tones of soil and rocks.

In each landscape, the artist creates a unique image. Landscape with Polyphemus (1649; Hermitage) is perceived as a broad and solemn hymn to nature; her mighty grandeur conquers in the Moscow "Landscape with Hercules" (1649). Depicting John the Evangelist on the island of Patmos (Chicago, Art Institute), Poussin refuses the traditional interpretation of this plot. He creates a landscape of rare beauty and strength of mood - a living personification of beautiful Hellas. The image of John in the interpretation of Poussin does not resemble a Christian hermit, but an ancient thinker.

In later years, Poussin even embodies thematic paintings in landscape forms. Such is his painting "Focion's Funeral" (after 1648; Louvre). The ancient hero Phocion was executed by the verdict of his ungrateful fellow citizens. He was even denied burial at home. The artist imagined the moment when the remains of Phocion were carried out of Athens on a stretcher by slaves. Temples, towers, city walls stand out against the background of the blue sky and green trees. Life goes on; a shepherd tends his flock, on the road oxen pull a wagon and a rider rushes. The beautiful landscape with particular poignancy makes one feel the tragic idea of ​​this work - the theme of man's loneliness, his powerlessness and frailty in the face of eternal nature. Even the death of a hero cannot overshadow her indifferent beauty. If the previous landscapes affirmed the unity of nature and man, then in the “Focion’s Funeral” the idea of ​​​​opposing the hero and the world around him appears, which personifies the conflict between man and reality, characteristic of this era.

The perception of the world in its tragic inconsistency was reflected in Poussin's famous landscape cycle "The Four Seasons", executed in the last years of his life (1660 -1664; Louvre). The artist poses and solves in these works the problem of life and death, nature and humanity. Each landscape has a certain symbolic meaning; for example, “Spring” (in this landscape Adam and Eve are represented in paradise) is the flowering of the world, the childhood of mankind, “Winter” depicts the flood, the death of life. The nature of Poussin and in the tragic "Winter" is full of grandeur and strength. Water rushing to the ground, with inexorable inevitability, absorbs all life. There is no escape anywhere. A flash of lightning cuts through the darkness of the night, and the world, engulfed in despair, appears as if petrified in immobility. In a feeling of chilling numbness that permeates the picture, Poussin embodies the idea of ​​approaching ruthless death.

The tragic "Winter" was the last work of the artist. In the autumn of 1665 Poussin - dies.

The significance of Poussin's art for his time and subsequent eras is enormous. Its true heirs were not the French academicians of the second half of the 17th century, but representatives of the revolutionary classicism of the 18th century, who managed to express the great ideas of their time in the forms of this art.

If various genres - historical and mythological painting, portrait and landscape - found their deep implementation in Poussin's work, then other masters of French classicism worked mainly in any one genre. As an example, one can name Claude Lorrain (1600-1682), the largest representative of the classicist landscape along with Poussin.

Claude Gellet was born in Lorraine (French Lorraine), hence his nickname Lorrain. He came from a peasant family. Orphaned early, Lorrain went to Italy as a boy, where he studied painting. Almost all of Lorrain's life, with the exception of a two-year stay in Naples and a short visit to Lorraine, was spent in Rome.

Lorrain was the creator of the classic landscape. Separate works of this kind appeared in the art of the Italian masters of the late 16th and early 17th centuries. - Annibale Carracci and Domenichino. A great contribution to landscape painting was made by the German painter Elsheimer, who worked in Rome. But only with Lorrain the landscape developed into a complete system and turned into an independent genre. Lorrain was inspired by the motifs of real Italian nature, but these motifs are transformed by him into an ideal image that corresponds to the norms of classicism. Unlike Poussin, in whom nature was perceived in a heroic way, Lorrain is primarily a lyricist. He has a more directly expressed living feeling, a shade of personal experience. He loves to depict the boundless expanses of the sea (Lorrain often painted sea harbors), wide horizons, play of light at sunrise or sunset, pre-dawn fog, thickening twilight. The early landscapes of Lorrain are characterized by some congestion with architectural motifs, brownish tones, strong contrasts of lighting - for example, in Campo Vaccino (1635; Louvre), depicting a meadow on the site of an ancient Roman forum, where people roam among the ancient ruins.

Lorrain enters his creative heyday in the 1650s. Since that time, his best works have appeared. Such, for example, is The Abduction of Europe (c. 1655; Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts). The compositions of the mature Lorrain do not depict – with a few exceptions – any particular landscape motif. They create, as it were, a generalized image of nature. The Moscow picture shows a beautiful azure bay, the coast of which is bordered by hills of calm outlines and transparent clumps of trees. The landscape is flooded with bright sunlight, only in the center of the bay on the sea lay a slight shadow from the cloud. Everything is full of blissful peace. Human figures are not as important in Lorrain as they are in Poussin's landscapes (Lorrain himself did not like to paint figures and entrusted their execution to other masters). However, the episode from the ancient myth about the abduction by Zeus, who turned into a bull, of the beautiful girl of Europe, interpreted in an idyllic spirit, corresponds to the general mood of the landscape; the same applies to other paintings by Lorrain - nature and people are given in them in a certain thematic relationship. To the best works of Lorrain in the 1650s. refers to the Dresden composition "Acis and Galatea" 1657.

In the later work of Lorrain, the perception of nature becomes more and more emotional. He is interested, for example, in changes in the landscape depending on the time of day. The main means in conveying mood are light and color. Thus, in the paintings kept in the Leningrad Hermitage, in a kind of integral cycle, the artist embodies the subtle poetry of Morning, the clear peace of Noon, the misty golden sunset of Evening, the bluish gloom of Night. The most poetic of these paintings is The Morning (1666). Here everything is shrouded in a silver-blue haze of the beginning dawn. A transparent silhouette of a large dark tree stands out against the lightening sky; ancient ruins are still immersed in a gloomy shadow - a motif that brings a shade of sadness to a clear and quiet landscape.

Lorrain is also known as an engraver-etcher and as a draftsman. Particularly remarkable are his landscape sketches from nature, performed by the artist during walks around the outskirts of Rome. In these drawings, with exceptional brightness, Lorrain's inherent emotional and direct sense of nature affected. These sketches, made in ink with the use of hillshade, are distinguished by an amazing breadth and freedom of the pictorial manner, the ability to achieve strong effects with simple means. The motifs of the drawings are very diverse: either this is a landscape of a panoramic nature, where a few bold strokes of the brush create the impression of boundless breadth, then a dense alley, and the rays of the sun, breaking through the foliage of trees, fall on the road, then just a stone overgrown with moss on the river bank, then, finally , a finished drawing of a majestic Building surrounded by a beautiful park (“Villa Albani”).

Lorrain's paintings for a long time - until the beginning of the 19th century - remained models for the masters of landscape painting. But many of his followers, who accepted only his external pictorial techniques, lost their truly living sense of nature.

The influence of Lorrain is also felt in the work of his contemporary Gaspard Duguet (1613-1675), who introduced elements of excitement and drama into the classical landscape, especially in the transfer of the effects of disturbing thunderstorm lighting. Among the works of Duguet, the most famous landscape cycles in the Roman palaces of Doria Pamphilj and Column.

Eustache Lesueur (1617-1655) joined the classical direction. He was a student of Vouet and assisted him in his decorative work. In the 1640s Lesueur was strongly influenced by Poussin's art.

Lesueur's work is an example of adapting the principles of classicism to the requirements that court and clerical circles set before art. In his largest work, the murals of the Hotel Lambert in Paris, Lesueur tried to combine the principles of the aesthetic doctrine of classicism with purely decorative effects. It is no coincidence, therefore, that in his great cycle “The Life of St. Bruno ”(1645-1648, Louvre), commissioned by church circles, there are features of proximity to the Baroque trend, which are reflected in the sugary idealization of images and in the general spirit of Catholic fanaticism that permeates this entire cycle. The art of Lesueur is one of the first symptoms of the degeneration of the classicist trend into court academicism.

In the second half of the 17th century. absolute monarchy in France reaches its greatest economic and political power and outward flourishing.

The process of centralization of the state was finally completed. After the defeat of the Fronde (1653), the power of the king increased and assumed an unlimited, despotic character. In an anonymous pamphlet of oppositional literature of the late 17th century. Louis XIV is called an idol to which all of France was sacrificed. In order to strengthen the economic position of the nobility, important measures were taken. An economic system was implemented based on wars of conquest and on the consistent pursuit of a policy of mercantilism; this system was called Colbertism - after Colbert, the first minister of the king. The royal court was the political center of the country. Magnificent country residences served as its residence, and above all (since the 1680s) - the famous Versailles. Life at court passed in endless festivities. The center of this life was the personality of the sun-king. His awakening from sleep, morning toilet, dinner, etc. - everything was subject to a certain ritual and took place in the form of solemn ceremonies.

The centralizing role of absolutism was also reflected in the fact that around the royal court in the second half of the 17th century. were collected, in essence, all the cultural forces of France. The most prominent architects, poets, playwrights, artists, musicians worked according to the orders of the court. The image of Louis XIV, either as a magnanimous monarch or as a proud winner, served as a theme for historical, allegorical, battle paintings, for ceremonial portraits and for tapestries.

Various trends in the art of France were now leveled in the "grand style" of the noble monarchy. The artistic life of the country was subjected to the strictest centralization. Back in 1648, the Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture was established. The founding of the Academy was of positive significance: for the first time, the activities of artists were freed from the oppression of the guild system and an orderly system of art education was created. But from the beginning of its existence, the activity of the Academy was subordinated to the interests of absolutism. In 1664, in accordance with the new tasks, Colbert reorganized the Academy, turning it into a state institution, entirely put at the service of the court. In 1671 the Academy of Architecture was founded. There was a lot of conservative activity in the activities of the French academies, but one should not forget that it was thanks to them that it was possible to train a huge number of masters who participated in the creation of the grandiose artistic ensembles of absolutist France.

Second half of the 17th century - heyday of French architecture. In the capital of France, Paris, extensive city squares and large palace, public and religious buildings are being reconstructed and rebuilt. Grandiose expensive construction work is being carried out to create the country residence of the king - Versailles. One of the reasons for the leading position of architecture among other arts in the second half of the 17th century. rooted in its specific features. It was architecture that could most fully and forcefully express the ideas of this stage in the development of a centralized national monarchy. The desire to search for a strict and monumental image, compositional integrity and stylistic unity is more clearly manifested. During this period, the organizing role of architecture in the artistic synthesis of all types of fine arts was especially clearly manifested. Architecture had a huge impact on the formation of decorative sculpture, painting and applied art of this time.

New artistic features in the architecture of the middle and second half of the 17th century, which developed within the framework of classicism, are manifested primarily in the huge spatial scope of buildings and ensembles, in the more consistent application of the classical order system, in the predominance of horizontal divisions over vertical ones, in greater integrity and unity of volume composition and interior space of the building. Along with the classical heritage of antiquity and the Renaissance, the creation of the style of French classicism of the second half of the 17th century. Italian baroque architecture had a great influence. This was reflected in the borrowing of certain architectural forms (curved pediments, volutes, magnificent cartouches), in the order compositions of the facades and the principles for solving their internal space (enfilade), in some features of the planning of large ensembles (longitudinal-axial construction), as well as in the inherent architecture French classicism increased pomposity of architectural forms, especially in interiors. However, the forms of classical and baroque architecture are exposed in the 17th century. radical processing in connection with national artistic traditions, which made it possible to bring these often contradictory elements to artistic unity.

The first work of French classicism architecture of the second half of the 17th century, in which the predominance of the artistic principles of classicism over the old traditions, was the ensemble of the palace and park of Vaux-le-Vicomte (1655-1661).

The creators of this remarkable work, built for the general controller of finances Fouquet and in many respects anticipating the ensemble of Versailles, were the architect Louis Leveau (c. 1612-1670), the master of landscape art Andre Le Nôtre, who laid out the park of the palace, and the painter Charles Lebrun, who took part in interior decoration of the palace and ceiling painting.

According to the composition of the plan, the allocation of the central and corner tower-shaped volumes, crowned with high roofs, the general open character of the building, surrounded by a moat filled with water, the palace of Vaux-le-Vicomte resembles the palace of Maisons-Laffite. As in Maisons-Laffitte, the architecture of this palace still retains some of the traditional features of French architecture dating back to past centuries. Nevertheless, in the appearance of the building, as well as in the compositional ensemble as a whole, there is undoubtedly a triumph of classical architectural principles.

This is manifested primarily in the logical and strictly verified planning decision of the palace and park. The large oval-shaped salon, which forms the central link of the suite of front rooms, has become the compositional center not only of the building, but of the ensemble as a whole, since it is located at the intersection of its main axes (the main park alley running from the palace, and the transverse ones, coinciding with the longitudinal axis of the building ). Thus, the building and the park are subject to a strictly centralizing compositional principle, which allows bringing the various elements of the Vaux-le-Viscount ensemble to a great artistic unity and highlighting the palace as the most important component of the ensemble.

The unity in the construction of the internal space and volume of the building is typical of the principles of classic architecture. The large oval salon is singled out as the center of the composition and crowned with a domed roof, which gives its silhouette a calm, balanced character. The introduction of a large order of pilasters, covering two floors above the basement, and a powerful horizontal of a smooth, strict classical entablature in profiles achieve the predominance of horizontal divisions over vertical ones, generalization and integrity of the facades and volume of the building, unusual for palaces of an earlier period. All this gives the appearance of the palace a monumental representativeness and splendor.

In contrast to some restraint of forms in the external appearance of the palace, the interiors of the building received a rich and free architectural interpretation. In the most ceremonial room of the palace - the oval salon - a rather strict order of Corinthian pilasters that divide the wall, and arched openings and niches located between the pilasters are combined with the magnificently decorated second tier of the wall, with heavy, baroque caryatids, garlands and cartouches. The interior space is illusoryly expanded by a favorite baroque technique - the introduction of mirrors in niches corresponding to window openings. The prospects that open from the windows of cozy living rooms and salons to the surrounding landscape and the strictly organized space of the park are perceived as a kind of logical continuation of the interior space of the interior.

The park ensemble of the Vaux-le-Viscount Palace was built according to a single, strictly regular system. Skillfully trimmed green spaces, alleys, flower beds, paths form clear, easily perceived geometric shapes and lines. Fountains and decorative statues frame the vast parterre and pool with a grotto, spread out in front of the palace facade.

In the Vaux-le-Vicomte ensemble, the original principles of the French classicism of the 17th century developed. synthesis of architecture, sculpture, painting and gardening art, which gained even greater scope and maturity in the ensemble of Versailles.

Other major Levo buildings include the central part of the Palace of Versailles (later rebuilt), the Hotel Lambert in Paris, and the monumental building of the College of the Four Nations (1661 - c. 1665).

In the College of the Four Nations (now the building of the French Academy of Sciences), one of the monumental buildings of that time, Levo develops the principles of classicist architecture in an urban ensemble. By locating the building of the College on the Seine embankment, Left reveals the powerful, widely deployed semicircles of its facade towards the river and the Louvre ensemble in such a way that the domed church, which is the center of the composition of the College, falls on the axis of the Louvre. This achieves the natural spatial unity of large urban buildings, which together form one of the architectural ensembles of the center of Paris.

In the architecture of the College building with its vast semicircle of an open courtyard, a developed silhouette, a strong emphasis on the center of the composition, the dominant importance of which is emphasized by the enlarged divisions and forms of the portal and dome, the image of a public building of great national importance was successfully found. Created by Levo on the basis of creative processing of the forms of palace and religious architecture, the appearance of a public building with a domed compositional center served as a prototype for many state and public buildings in European architecture of the 18th and 19th centuries.

One of the first works of the second half of the 17th century, in which the fundamental principles of French classicism were most fully expressed, is the eastern facade of the Louvre (1667-1678), in the design and construction of which Francois d'Orbe (1634-1697), Louis Levo and Claude Perrault (1613-1688).

The eastern facade of the Louvre, often called the Louvre Colonnade, is part of an ensemble of two combined in the 17th century. palaces - the Tuileries and the Louvre. The façade of great length (173 m) has a central and two side risalits, between which powerful (12 m high) double Corinthian columns rest on a monumental smooth plinth with rare openings, forming, together with the wall receding deep into, deep shaded loggias. The richest in its forms, decor and articulations, the risalit of the central entrance with a three-span portico is crowned with a triangular pediment antiquity in shape and proportions. The tympanum of the pediment is richly decorated with sculptural relief. The side risalits, which have a less rich plastic development, are dissected by double pilasters of the same order. The flat architectural relief of the side projections creates a logical transition to the side facades of the Louvre, which repeated the composition of the eastern facade, with the difference that the double Corinthian columns were replaced in them by single pilasters of the same order.

In the extremely simple three-dimensional structure of the building, in the clear and logical division of the volume into carried and load-bearing parts, in the details and proportions of the Corinthian order close to the classical canon, and, finally, in subordinating the composition to a strongly identified rhythmic order beginning, the mature artistic principles of classic architecture are developed. 17th century. The monumental facade of the building, with its enlarged forms and emphasized scale, is full of grandeur and nobility, but at the same time, it has a hint of rational coldness, characteristic of mature classicism.

François Blondel (1617-1686) made an important contribution to the theory and practice of French classicism. Among his best works is the triumphal arch, usually called the Saint-Denis gate in Paris. The architecture of the monumental triumphal arch, erected to the glory of French weapons in commemoration of the crossing of the Rhine by French troops in 1672, is distinguished by great conciseness, generalization of forms and underlined splendor. Blondel's great merit lies in the deep creative processing of the type of Roman triumphal arch and the creation of a unique composition that had a strong influence on the architecture of such structures in the 18-19 centuries.

The problem of the architectural ensemble, which had been at the center of attention of the classicist masters of the 17th century for almost the entire century, found its expression in French town planning. The greatest French architect of the 17th century, Jules Hardouin Mansart (1646-1708; since 1688, he bore the surname Hardouin-Mansart), acted as an outstanding innovator in creating an ensemble of a large urban public center.

One of the clearest examples of the skillful resolution of large urban planning tasks is the construction by Hardouin-Mansart of the Church of Les Invalides (1693-1706), which completes the huge complex built according to the project of Liberal Bruant (c. 1635-1697). The Les Invalides, designed to house hostels for war veterans, is conceived as one of the most grandiose public buildings of the 17th century. In front of the main facade of the building, located on the left bank of the Seine, there is a vast square, the so-called Esplanade des Invalides, which, adjoining directly to the river, seems to pick up and continue the development of the right-bank ensemble of the Tuileries and the Louvre in the left-bank part of the city. The strictly symmetrical complex of the Les Invalides consists of four-storey buildings closed around the perimeter, forming a developed system of large rectangular and square courtyards, subordinate to a single compositional center - a large courtyard and a monumental church associated with it.

The church is a centric building with a square plan and a large, 27 m in diameter, dome, which crowns the vast central space. In the strict and restrained in its forms, the architecture of the temple still feels the influence of baroque compositions not alien to the work of Hardouin-Mansart. This is reflected in the weighted proportions of the dome in relation to the lower volume and in the plastic enrichment of the central part of the facade with order elements, characteristic of the Baroque.

The dome of the Church of the Invalides is one of the most beautiful and tallest domes in world architecture. It was conceived as a compositional center crowning the vast sprawling array of the Les Invalides, and is also of great importance in terms of general urban planning: along with the domes of the Val de Grace church and built in the 18th century. Pantheon, he creates an expressive silhouette of the southern part of Paris.

Particularly important in the French urban planning practice of the 17th century are the Place Louis the Great (later Place Vendôme) (1685-1701) and the Place des Victories (1684-1687) built according to the designs of the architect Hardouin-Mansart.

Having the shape of a rectangle with cut corners (dimensions 146 X 136), Place Louis the Great was conceived as a front building in honor of the king. In accordance with the plan, the equestrian statue of Louis XIV by Girardon, located in the center of the square, played a dominant role in the composition. The facades of the buildings forming the square, of the same type in composition, with slightly protruding porticos at the cut corners and in the central part of the buildings, serve as an architectural frame for the space of the square. Connected to the surrounding neighborhoods by only two short stretches of streets, the square is perceived as a closed, isolated space.

Another ensemble is Victory Square, which in plan has the shape of a circle with a diameter of 60 m, in terms of the uniformity of the facades surrounding the square and the location of the monument in the center, it is close to Louis the Great Square. However, the location of the square at the intersection of several streets, actively connected with the general system of city planning, deprives it of isolation and isolation.

With the creation of Victory Square, Hardouin-Mansart laid the foundations for progressive urban planning trends in the construction of open public centers closely related to the planning system of the city. However, the implementation of these principles in European urban planning falls already in the 18th and first half of the 19th century.

Progressive tendencies in the architecture of French classicism of the 17th century are fully and comprehensively developed in the ensemble of Versailles (1668-1689), grandiose in scale, courage and breadth of artistic design. The main creators of this most significant monument of French classicism of the 17th century. were Hardouin-Mansart and the master of landscape art Andre Le Nôtre (1613-1700).

The original idea of ​​the ensemble of Versailles, consisting of a city, a palace and a park, belongs, in all likelihood, to Levo and Le Nôtre. Both masters began to work on the construction of Versailles from 1668. During the implementation of the ensemble, this plan has undergone numerous changes. The final completion of the Versailles ensemble belongs to Hardouin-Mansart.

Versailles, as the main residence of the king, was supposed to exalt and glorify the boundless power of French absolutism. However, this does not exhaust the content of the ideological and artistic conception of the ensemble of Versailles, as well as its outstanding significance in the history of world architecture. Shackled by official regulations, forced to submit to the requirements of the court, the builders of Versailles - a huge army of architects, engineers, artists, masters of applied and landscape gardening art - managed to embody in it the enormous creative forces of the French people.

The features of building a complex ensemble as a strictly ordered centralized system based on the absolute compositional dominance of the palace over everything around are due to its general ideological design.

To the Palace of Versailles, located on a terrace towering above the surrounding area, three wide, completely straight radial avenues of the city converge; the middle avenue continues on the other side of the palace in the form of the main alley of a huge park. Perpendicular to this main compositional axis of the city and the park is the building of the palace, strongly elongated in width. The middle avenue leads to Paris, the other two - to the royal palaces of Saint-Cloud and So; thus, Versailles was connected by roads approaching it with different regions of France.

The Palace of Versailles was built in three steps: the most ancient part is the hunting castle of Louis XIII, begun construction in 1624 and later rebuilt; then there are buildings surrounding this core, built by the Left, and, finally, two parks receding to the side along the upper terrace of the wing, erected by Hardouin-Mansart.

In the central building of the palace, luxurious halls for balls and ceremonial receptions, a huge Mirror Gallery, the halls of Peace and War were concentrated, forming spectacular enfilades. Mars, Apollo and the private quarters of the king and queen. In the wings of the building there were rooms for relatives of the royal family, courtiers, ministers and distinguished guests. A palace chapel adjoins one of the wings of the Building.

Adjacent to the main building from the side of the city, palace services were located in two large independent buildings, forming a large rectangular square in front of the central building of the palace.

Luxurious interior decoration, which widely used baroque motifs (round and oval medallions, complex cartouches, ornamental fillings above doors and in piers) and expensive finishing materials (mirrors, chased bronze, marble, gilded wood carvings), extensive use of decorative painting - all it is designed to create an impression of grandeur and splendor. One of the most remarkable rooms of the Palace of Versailles is built by Hardouin-Mansart and located on the second floor of the central part of the magnificent Mirror Gallery (73 m long) with adjoining square living rooms. Through the wide arched openings, a magnificent view of the main alley of the park and the surrounding landscape opens up. The inner space of the gallery is illusoryly expanded by a number of large mirrors located in niches opposite the windows. The interior of the gallery is richly decorated with marble Corinthian pilasters and a magnificent stucco cornice, which serves as a transition to the baroque ceiling of the artist Lebrun, even more complex in composition and color scheme.

The architecture of the facades created by Hardouin-Mansart, especially from the side of the park, is distinguished by great unity. Strongly stretched horizontally, the building of the palace harmonizes well with the strict geometrically correct layout of the park and the natural environment. In the composition of the facade, the second, front floor of the palace is clearly distinguished, dissected by a strict order of columns and pilasters, resting on a heavy rusticated plinth, by a strict order of proportions and details. The uppermost, lower floor is conceived as an attic crowning the building, imparting greater monumentality and representativeness to the image of the palace.

In contrast to the architecture of the facades of the palace, which are not devoid of a somewhat Baroque representativeness, as well as the interiors overloaded with decorations and gilding, the layout of the park, made by Le Nôtre, is distinguished by classical purity and clarity of lines and forms. In the layout of the park and the forms of its "green architecture" Le Nôtre was the most consistent expression of the aesthetic and ethical ideal of classicism. He saw the natural environment as an object of intelligent human activity. Le Nôtre transforms the natural landscape into an impeccably clear, complete architectonic system based on the principles of rationality and order.

A general view of the park opens from the side of the palace. From the main terrace, a wide staircase leads along the main axis of the composition of the ensemble to the Latona Fountain, then the Royal Alley, bordered by cut trees, leads to the Apollo Fountain. The composition ends with a large canal stretching towards the horizon, framed by alleys of trimmed trees.

In organic unity with the layout of the park and the architectural appearance of the palace, there is a rich and varied sculptural decoration of the park. The park sculpture of Versailles is actively involved in the formation of the ensemble. Sculptural groups, statues, herms and vases with reliefs, many of which were created by outstanding sculptors of their time, close the vistas of green streets, frame squares and alleys, form complex and beautiful combinations with various fountains and pools. Each statue personified a certain concept, a certain image, which was part of a general allegorical system that served to glorify the monarchy.

The park of Versailles with its clearly expressed architectonic construction, richness and variety of forms - marble and bronze sculptures, foliage of trees, fountains, pools, straight lines of avenues, geometrically correct volumes and surfaces of trimmed bushes and trees - resembles a huge "green palace" with enfilades of various squares and streets. These "green enfilades" are perceived as a natural continuation and development of the inner space of the palace itself. The architectural image of the ensemble of Versailles is built in an organic connection with the natural environment, in the regular and consistent disclosure of various internal and external perspective aspects, in the synthesis of architecture, sculpture and painting.

The construction of Versailles and other country palaces had a huge impact on the development of applied art. The art industry of France in the second half of the 17th century. reached a high peak. Furniture, mirrors, silverware, jewelry, carpets, fabrics and lace were made not only for the palace and for consumers inside France, but also for wide export abroad, which was one of the features of the policy of mercantilism. For this purpose, special royal manufactories were organized. As a positive fact, it should be noted that the organization of art production on the basis of centralization, along with the system of academic education, led to a great stylistic unity also in various branches of the art industry.

French craftsmen achieved remarkable results in the production of tapestries. In 1662, Colbert bought the famous Gobelins carpet workshop (hence the name - tapestry) and established the royal tapestry workshop. Charles Lebrun became the director of the manufactory, and most of the tapestries for Versailles were executed from his cardboards. In these tapestries, produced in series and connected by plot unity, Lebrun's decorative talent was most clearly manifested. The effectiveness of the compositional solution was combined in tapestries with lush ornamental magnificence and an exquisite sense of color.

Andre Charles Boulle (1642-1732) was the greatest master of artistic furniture, the creator of a special technique for its decoration. For decoration, Buhl used ornamental inlay from various types of wood, gilded bronze, mother-of-pearl, tortoise, ivory. Laid-on metal ornaments were distinguished by decorative richness and subtlety of chased work.

And in small forms of applied art, artists sought to emphasize monumentality, strict symmetry, and at the same time luxury and splendor. High artistic merits are created in the 17th century. French silverware: dishes, bowls, wall sconces, floor lamps, candelabra. Works of applied art organically entered the general architectural and artistic ensemble and were an integral part of the absolutist "grand style". Monuments of French applied arts were widely used in other countries of Western Europe and for a long time served as a role model.

In the second half of the 17th century. French sculpture developed mainly within the boundaries of the "grand style". Monuments of sculpture were widely used in the creation of urban and palace and park ensembles, in decorating public and religious buildings. It was the close relationship with architecture that largely predetermined the best qualities of French sculpture of that time. Even works of easel sculpture - statuary sculpture, ceremonial portrait - carried features that brought them closer to works of monumental sculpture. The requirements of the "grand style", the need to meet the demands of the royal court often narrowed the possibilities of the masters of French sculpture. However, the best of them still achieved great creative success.

The greatest achievements of French sculpture of the 17th century. associated with the Versailles palace complex, in the creation of which the leading masters of that time took part - Girardon, Puget, Kuazevoks and others.

With the greatest clarity, the characteristic features of French sculpture of the second half of the 17th century were expressed in the work of Francois Girardon (1628-1715). A student of Bernini, Girardon performed decorative sculptures at the Louvre, the Tuileries Palace and Versailles. Among his outstanding works is the sculptural group "The Rape of Proserpina" (1699) in the park of Versailles. It is placed in the center of a round colonnade, elegant in shape and proportions, created by the architect Hardouin-Mansart. On a cylindrical pedestal, surrounded by a relief depicting Ceres chasing Pluto, who is taking away Proserpina in a chariot, a sculptural group, complex in terms of composition and dynamic construction, rises. In accordance with the purpose of this work, Girardon focuses on the decorative expressiveness of the sculpture: designed to go around from all sides, the group has a great wealth of plastic aspects.

Among the famous works of Girardon is also located in the grotto against the background of the dense thickets of the park, the sculptural group "Apollo and the Nymphs" (1666-1675). The freshness of perception, the sensual beauty of the images, distinguishes the relief “Bathing Nymphs”, made by Girardon for one of the Versailles reservoirs. As if forgetting about conventional academic traditions, the sculptor created a work full of vitality and poetry. The mastery of relief inherent in Francois Girardon also manifested itself in compositional images on decorative vases intended for Versailles (“The Triumph of Galatea”, “The Triumph of Amphitrite”).

Girardon also worked in other types of monumental sculpture. He owns the tombstone of Richelieu in the Sorbonne church (1694). He was the author of the equestrian statue of Louis XIV, installed in the Place Vendôme (later destroyed during the French Revolution of the 18th century). The king is depicted seated on a solemnly stepping horse; he is in the attire of a Roman general, but in a wig. The idea of ​​the greatness and power of the all-powerful monarch was embodied in the idealized about the glare of Louis. The sculptor found the necessary proportional relationship between the statue and the pedestal, and the entire monument as a whole - with the space of the square surrounding it and its architecture, thanks to which the equestrian statue turned out to be the true center of the majestic architectural ensemble. This is the work of Girardon throughout the 18th century. served as a model for equestrian monuments of European sovereigns.

In the work of another French sculptor of the second half of the 17th century. - Antoine Coisevox (1640-1720) - in comparison with the art of Girardon, the features of academicism were manifested to a much greater extent. Coisevox worked with Lebrun on the decoration of the Palace of Versailles. He made sculptural decorations for the Mirror Gallery and the Hall of War. He was also the author of a large number of portrait statues and busts (Louis XIV, Prince Condé, Lebrun, Audran). In these spectacular, but insufficiently deep works, Coisevox follows the tradition of the Baroque ceremonial portrait.

A special place in the history of French sculpture of this time is occupied by the work of Pierre Puget (1620-1694), the most important representative of French plastic art of the 17th century.

Puget came from the family of a Marseille mason. Even as a child, he worked as an apprentice in ship workshops as a wood carver. As a young man, Puget went to Italy, where he studied painting with Pietro da Cortona. However, he found his true calling in sculpture. Puget worked for some time in Paris, but his main creative activity took place in Toulon and Marseilles, the Sculptor also had to fulfill official orders, in particular to decorate the Versailles park.

Puget's art is close to baroque in terms of outward pathos. But, unlike Bernini and other masters of the Italian Baroque, Puget is free from mystical exaltation and superficial idealization - his images are more direct, fresh, they feel vitality.

In this regard, one of the main works of Puget is indicative - the marble group "Milon of Croton" (Louvre). Puget depicted an athlete who fell with his hand into a split in a tree and was torn to pieces by a lion. Milo's face is distorted by unbearable torment, tension is felt in every muscle of his powerful body. With the general complex turn of the athlete's figure and strong dynamics, the compositional structure of the group is distinct and clear - the sculpture is excellently perceived from one, main point of view.

Puget's talent was manifested in his original and bold in design relief "Alexander the Great and Diogenes" (1692, Louvre). Against the backdrop of monumental architectural structures, the sculptor presented figures of actors powerful in modeling, bright in figurative characteristics. Chiaroscuro, enhancing the plastic tangibility of the figures, gives the image a pathetic character. Overflowing vital energy - such is the impression from the images of this relief. The same features are inherent in other works by Puget, for example, his atlantes supporting the balcony of the Toulon town hall. Even in the officially commissioned bas-relief portrait of Louis XIV (Marseille), Puget, within the framework of a solemnly representative portrait, creates a convincing image of an arrogant monarch.

French painting of the second half of the 17th century. found an even greater dependence on official requirements than sculpture. By the end of the 1660s. The Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture developed those normative rules that served to create a "grand style". Asserting the inviolability of these rules, the representatives of the Academy hid behind the authority of Poussin. However, the art of the great French artist had nothing to do with the dead, dogmatic art system that was developed by the Academy. In this system, the most negative aspects of the aesthetic doctrine of classicism were used and accepted as the norms of beauty. Since classicism lacked the pomposity to solemnly glorify royal power, the "great style" of French painting also included an arsenal of techniques of monumental baroque art.

The cult of antiquity was used by academism to create abstract, non-national norms of beauty. However, these norms were sketchy and lifeless. Even the transmission of human emotions was regulated, which were depicted according to a once-for-all established template. The dogmatism of academic doctrine limited the creative possibilities of French artists and fettered their individuality.

Charles Lebrun (1619-1690) became the leader of academicism and the main legislator of the "grand style". A student of Vouet, Lebrun was at the same time one of the most ardent admirers of Poussin, whose art he imitated, especially in the early period of his work. In 1642-1646. young Lebrun worked in Italy, where he copied the works of Raphael and representatives of Bolognese academicism. Upon returning to his homeland, Lebrun was mainly busy with decorative work in the palaces and mansions of the nobility (the Lambert hotel, the castle of Vaux-le-Vicomte). From the 1660s he began to work at court, creating a series of paintings "The Exploits of Alexander the Great." Appointed in 1662 as the "first painter of the king" and at the same time director of the tapestry manufactory, he supervised the largest works on decorating the royal palaces, and especially Versailles. He led a whole army of decorators, engravers, jewelers and craftsmen who worked to implement his ideas. Possessing great professional knowledge, energy and outstanding organizational skills, Lebrun became a true dictator of artistic tastes.

In his work, Lebrun used the traditions of decorative baroque painting. One of his central works is the ceiling of the Mirror Gallery at Versailles depicting the apotheosis of Louis XIV. The impression of splendor and splendor and at the same time a very superficial, external effect is created by this complex composition overloaded with decorations, in which the depiction of historical events is complemented by allegorical figures.

One of the founders of the Academy and its director, Lebrun implemented a system of strict centralization in the field of art. In his reports for the Academy, he appears as the creator of the aesthetics of academism. Considering himself a follower of Poussin, Lebrun proved the paramount importance of drawing, in contrast to those representatives of academicism, the so-called "Rubensists", who proclaimed the priority of color. Lebrun's opponent in this matter was the painter Pierre Mignard (1612-1695), his competitor and personal enemy. In his narrative compositions, Mignard is a typical representative of academicism. An example of his theatrical conditional and sugary painting is the huge painting The Generosity of Alexander the Great (1689, the Hermitage). Mignard was also the author of the ceiling painting and the dome of the Val de Grae church (1663); in this work, the theatricality of images, the excessive dynamism of an overloaded composition, and the desire for external showiness, characteristic of the Baroque, reach their limit. Mignard is better known as a favorite portrait painter of court society. Idealized and superficial portraits of Mignard found a very apt and true characterization in the mouth of Poussin, who found them "cold, cloying, devoid of strength and firmness." The artistic doctrines of Lebrun and Mignard had nothing in common with the true content of the art of Poussin and Rubens. Differences in their views practically did not go beyond academicism.

In the second half of the 17th century. in French painting, the battle genre also developed, in which two directions can be noted. The first direction, wholly associated with court circles, is represented by the work of Adam Frans van der Meulen (1632-1690), a Fleming by origin. Van der Meulen created a type of official battle composition, completely conditional in character. He painted city sieges, military campaigns, battles, and the action in these paintings takes place in the background and, in essence, is only a background for the king and generals depicted in the foreground.

Another line of the battle genre is characterized by the work of Jacques Courtois, nicknamed Bourguignon (1621-1675/6), who worked mainly in Italy. The paintings of Bourguignon are close to the battle works of the Italian Salvator Rosa and the Dutchman Vouverman. Like them, he paints bivouacs, cavalry skirmishes, where unknown warriors fight, and the viewer finds it difficult to determine on which side the artist's sympathy is. Despite the outward showiness of these dynamic compositions, they are still very superficial and stereotyped.

The highest achievements of French painting in the second half of the 17th century. belong to the portrait area.

The portrait of this time is almost entirely court in nature. It developed as a natural continuation of the formal portrait forms developed by Rubens and Van Dyck, and the French portrait painters adopted from these masters mainly the features of external representativeness. The portrait painter was required, first of all, to communicate to the models the traits of grandeur, aristocratic nobility and sophistication. Determining the scheme of the ceremonial portrait, the art theorist Roger de Piles wrote: “The portrait should, as it were, tell us: stop, look carefully, I am an invincible king, full of greatness; or I am a brave commander who spread fear around him; or I am a great minister who knew all political tricks; or I am a magistrate who has perfect wisdom and justice.”

In their desire to exalt the model, the artists often resorted to outright flattery. All this should elevate the person portrayed above everyday life, surround him with an aura of exclusivity, show his high social position, emphasize the distance that separates him from mere mortals.

The largest masters of the French portrait of the late 17th - early 18th century. were Rigaud and Largilliere.

Hyacinthe Rigaud (1659-1743) was the king's court portrait painter. His famous portrait of Louis XIV (1701; Louvre) is the most striking embodiment of the characteristic features of the ceremonial portrait. In this canvas, the king is depicted in full growth against the backdrop of a column and fluttering draperies; standing in a spectacular pose, he leans on a scepter. An ermine robe falls in lush folds from his shoulders; flabby face full of arrogance. The painting of this portrait is distinguished by its virtuoso brilliance and underlined showiness. The same features are characteristic of other works by Rigaud, for example, portraits of a prominent representative of Catholic theology Bossuet (Louvre) and the Marquis Danjo (Versailles).

But where Rigaud was not constrained by the terms of the order, he created works of great realistic persuasiveness. So, for example, in the portrait of the writer Fontenelle (A. S. Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts), made in the form of an intimate rather than a formal portrait, the artist, with great brightness of individual characteristics, embodied the image of one of the progressive figures of French culture, full of mind and liveliness. The coloring of this portrait is based on deep sonorous tones and is free from external showiness.

Nicolas Largilliere (1656-1746) was also a master of formal portraiture. He was the author of exaggeratedly representative group portraits of Parisian echevins (members of the city government, which included mainly representatives of the French big bourgeoisie). These works have not survived; sketches for them are in the Louvre and in the Hermitage. Full of arrogant importance, elders in heavy velvet robes and huge wigs are depicted in magnificent palace halls decorated with columns and draperies.

Largilliere was one of the celebrated and fashionable portrait painters of the French nobility. He went even further than Rigaud along the path of frank flattery, and his portraits are even more conditional. Even his “Family Portrait” (Louvre), in which the artist depicted himself with his wife and daughter, is distinguished by sweetness and affectation. Largilliere created the canon of the female ceremonial portrait, which was further developed by painters of the 18th century. He painted secular ladies in the form of ancient goddesses, nymphs, hunters, depicting them in theatrical costumes against the background of a conditionally interpreted landscape. In his models, he emphasizes the graceful ease of posture, the grace of gestures, the tenderness of milky-white skin, the wet sparkle of the eyes, the elegance of the toilet. These portraits are very elegant and refined, the artist softens the colors, with a virtuoso brilliance conveys the texture of luxurious fabrics, the play of velvet and satin, the shimmer of jewelry. The portrait of the chamberlain de Montargue (Dresden) belongs to the good examples of Largilliere's secular portraits. Some of his portraits, such as "Portrait of a Woman" in the Museum of Fine Arts. A.S. Pushkin, are not devoid of vital charm, many of them are extremely conditional. In some works, Larzhiliere still managed to go beyond convention and create lively, vivid images. These are his portraits of Voltaire (Paris, Carnavalet Museum) and the landscape painter Fauré (Berlin).

Along with paintings in the second half of the 17th century, portrait engraving also developed in France, the largest representatives of which were engravers and draftsmen Claude Mellan (1598-1688) and Robert Nanteuil (1623-1678), who created a whole gallery of magnificent portraits of statesmen, courtiers, philosophers and writers of his time. Masterfully mastering the technique of incisive engraving, they managed to combine in their portraits the accuracy of characteristics with the solemn splendor of images. At the same time, chisel engraving developed, reproducing the compositions of Poussin, Lebrun, Lesueur, Mipyar. The most famous master of reproduction engraving was Gerard Audran (1640-1703).

The pan-European significance of French art of the 17th century is very great. France was a classical country of absolutism, and in its art the characteristics of this era found their most striking expression. Therefore, not a single European state that experienced in the 17-18 centuries. absolutist stage, could not pass by the achievements of French art. If the French artists of the early 17th century. often turned to the art of other, more artistically developed countries, then in the second half of the century it was France that was ahead of other national art schools in Europe. The urban planning principles and types of architectural structures developed in French architecture, and in the visual arts - the foundations of the historical and battle genre, allegory, ceremonial portrait, classical landscape retained their significance for the art of many European countries until the beginning of the 19th century.

The work was added to the site site: 2016-03-13

Order writing a unique work

12-49. French architecture 17th century. Growth of cities. Gardens and parks. Rise of classicism. Works by Leveaux, Mansara. Ensemble of Versailles. Parisian squares.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#5e6669;background:#ffffff">XVII century one of the brightest eras in the development of Western European artistic culture. The most significant and valuable that was created by this era is associated primarily with the art of five European countries Italy, Spain, Flanders, Holland, France... I'll tell you about France

;text-decoration:underline;color:#ff0000">City growth

;font-family:"Arial";color:#5e6669;background:#ffffff">The architecture of French classicism of the 17th century was characterized by logical and balanced compositions, clarity of straight lines, geometric correctness of plans and strict proportions.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#5e6669">Construction and control are concentrated in the hands of the state. A new position of "architect of the king" and "first architect" is introduced. Huge amounts of money are spent on construction. Public institutions control construction not only in Paris , but also in the provinces. Urban planning work is widely deployed throughout the country. New cities arise as settlements near the palaces and castles of the kings and rulers of France. In most cases, new cities are designed in the form of a square or rectangle in plan or in the form of more complex forms - five, six, eight, etc. squares formed by defensive walls, moats, bastions and towers.Inside them, a strictly regular rectangular or radial-circular system of streets is planned with a city square in the center.Examples include the cities of Vitry-le-Francois, Saarlouis, Henrishmont, Marl, Richelieu, etc.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#5e6669">Old medieval cities are being rebuilt on the basis of new principles of regular planning. Straight highways are being laid, urban ensembles and geometrically regular squares are being built on the site of a chaotic network of medieval streets.

However, during the years of the French Revolution, steps were taken that played a significant role in the history of architecture. In 1794, the Commission of Artists was formed, which was engaged in the improvement of the city, and also planned changes in its appearance. These plans had an impact on subsequent urban transformations in Paris, already implemented in the Napoleonic era.

;text-decoration:underline;color:#ff0000">Paris squares

;color:#ff0000">1) ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#258fcc"> Place Vendôme

R ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">Located in the 1st arrondissement of Paris, the octagonal Place Vendôme was named after the son of Henry IV and his mistress, the Duchess de Beaufort, the Duke of Vendôme, whose mansion was located nearby.

P ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">The horse was designed by an architect;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">Jules Hardouin-Mansart;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">and was built in 1699-1701 according to the classical "royal" scheme: houses with elegant facades form a closed space, in the center of which there is an equestrian monument to Louis XIV. Unfortunately, the monument like many other symbols of the monarchy, it was destroyed during the French Revolution.

P ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">during the reign of Napoleon Bonaparte, a bronze column was erected in the center of Place Vendôme, made (1806-1810) by the architects Jacques Gonduin and Jean-Baptiste Leper. The column, 44 meters high, was cast from Austrian and Russian cannons, and the Roman column of Trajan served as a model for the Vendome column.

AT ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">the Andome column is adorned with a spiral bas-relief depicting Napoleon's victories and surmounted by a statue of the emperor (sculptor Antoine-Denis Chaudet). In 1814, the figure of Napoleon was replaced by the white flag of the Bourbon dynasty, and the sculpture itself was later melted down.

AT ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929"> In 1833, a new statue of Napoleon was erected on top of the column by order of Louis Philippe I. And a little later, by order of Napoleon III, who feared that the statue would suffer from bad weather conditions , in the 1850s, the sculpture was exhibited in the Les Invalides, and a copy replaced it on the column.

AT ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">during the Paris Commune in 1871, the Vendome Column was dismantled member of the Central Committee, the artist Gustave Courbet, insisted on this. But this was not enough for the Parisians as a result, the column was completely destroyed. After defeat of the Paris Commune, the Vendome column was restored and crowned with another copy of the statue of Napoleon (Gustave Courbet was obliged to pay all expenses).

H ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">Dating back to the Second Empire, Place Vendôme houses the most luxurious boutiques and famous jewelry houses, including Chanel and Cartier. The Ritz Hotel, whose creator Cesar Ritz offered its guests interior and comfort worthy of royal blood.The guests of the hotel at one time were Coco Chanel (by the way, she lived in the hotel for the last 37 years of her life), Charlie Chaplin, Agnes Hemingway, Scott Fitzgerald and many more.

;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#258fcc">2)Charles de Gaulle Square or Star Square

O ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">one of the busiest squares in the French capital Place Charles de Gaulle (also known as Place des Stars) is located in the 8th arrondissement of Paris, on top of Chaillot hill.

P ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">the appearance of the square was not mentioned in any urban planning project, but the construction of the Tuileries Palace and the garden of the same name required a worthy design of the residence of the kings. Therefore, the famous landscape architect of the 17th century, Andre Le Nôtre, right up to the hill of Chaillot paved an avenue (now the famous Champs Elysees), which ended in a round square, and 5 new roads diverged from it in different directions - it was from here that the square originally got the name of Star Square. more like a fork in the road than a square.

With ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">1836, the square is decorated with the majestic Arc de Triomphe, erected in its very center by order of Napoleon Bonaparte and glorifying the military victories of France.

O ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">the shape of the square was finally formed only in 1854, when, according to the plan of the prefect of Paris, Baron Haussmann, 7 more streets were added to the square, and then there were 12 avenues-beams. The most famous and wide of these Champs-Elysées, connecting the Place des Stars with Place de la Concorde.

AT ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929"> In 1970, Place des Stars was officially renamed Place Charles de Gaulle in honor of the first president of the Fifth Republic, but Parisians often continue to use the old name.

;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#258fcc">3) Place de la Concorde

;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">The central square of Paris Place de la Concorde is a magnificent creation of the Classical era and is rightfully considered one of the most beautiful in the world.

;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">The architectural project of the future square, the place for which the square was chosen by Louis XV himself, was completed in 1757. The construction was completed only in 1779, and in the very center of the new square, originally called Royal, an equestrian statue was erected by sculptors E. Bouchardon and J.-B. Pigalle.

;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">During the French Revolution, it was decided to rename the square into the Place de la Révolution and demolish the equestrian monument. A guillotine was placed here, on which Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette, L A. Saint-Just, C. Corday, J. J. Danton, C. Desmoulins and M. Robespierre In total, more than a thousand executions were carried out.

;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">In 1795, as a sign of reconciliation of the estates, after the end of the revolutionary events, the square was again renamed this time into the Place de la Concorde.

;font-family:"Verdana";color:#000000;background:#ffffff">The ancient Egyptian obelisk (Luxor obelisk), two fountains, equestrian groups and marble statues depicting the cities of France appeared under Louis Philippe. In 1835, the architect Gittorf completed the design of the square, observing the principles of Gabriel's planning: it is not built up around the perimeter with houses, thanks to which wide vistas open up from any point of the square.

;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#258fcc">4) Pyramid Square

R ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">Located opposite the entrance to the Tuileries Garden, the Pyramid Square got its name in memory of Napoleon Bonaparte's expedition to Egypt.

P ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929">formerly, on the site of the square was the Academy of Horse Riding, which was run by the personal groom of three monarchs Henry III, Henry IV and Louis XIII Antoine de Pluvenel.

AT ;font-family:"Helvetica";color:#292929"> in the center of the square is an equestrian statue of Joan of Arc, made by sculptor Emmanuel Fremier. The monument was commissioned by the republican government back in 1870 after the fall of the Second Empire and installed on the square in 1874 not far from the place where Joan of Arc was wounded in 1429 during the siege of Paris.

More squares in Paris:

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Greve Square

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Pigalle

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Place de la Bastille

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Victory Square

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Place des Vosges

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Republic Square

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Place Tertre

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Chatelet Square

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Place Saint-Michel

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Nation Square

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Place Madeleine

;text-decoration:underline;color:#ff0000">Rise of Classicism. Works by Leveaux, Mansart. Ensembles of Versailles

;color:#000000;background:#ffffff">The most profound reflection of the essential features of the era manifested itself in France in the forms and progressive trends in the art of classicism.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#5e6669;background:#ffffff">Classicism- A stylistic trend in European art, the most important feature of which was the appeal to ancient art as a standard and reliance on the traditions of the High Renaissance.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000;background:#ffffff">The second half of the 17th century was the time of the highest flowering of French classicism architecture.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000;background:#ffffff">The organization of the Academy of Architecture, whose director was appointed the prominent architect and theorist François Blondel (1617-1686), had a great influence on the development of architecture. Its members were prominent French architects L. Briand, J. Guittar, A. Le Nôtre, L. Levo, P. Miyan, etc. The task of the Academy was to develop the main aesthetic norms and criteria of classicism architecture, which should guide the architects.;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000"> Features of the architecture of the middle and second half of the 17th century are reflected in the huge volume of construction of large ceremonial ensembles, designed to exalt and glorify the ruling classes of the era of absolutism and the powerful monarch - the sun king Louis XIV , and in the improvement and development of the artistic principles of classicism.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">In the second half of the 17th century, a more consistent use of the classical order system is observed: horizontal divisions prevail over vertical ones; high separate roofs constantly disappear and are replaced by a single roof, often masked by a balustrade; three-dimensional composition buildings become simpler, more compact, corresponding to the location and size of the interior.

;color:#000000;background:#ffffff">Representatives of classicism found the embodiment of their social ideals in Ancient Greece and Republican Rome, just as ancient art was the personification of aesthetic norms for them.

;color:#000000;background:#ffffff">Main stylistic features of Classicism architecture on the example of the Palace of Versailles.

;color:#000000;background:#ffffff">Only under the conditions of a powerful centralized monarchy was it possible at that time to create huge urban and palace ensembles made according to a single plan, designed to embody the idea of ​​the power of an absolute monarch. It is no coincidence, therefore, that the flowering of French architecture Classicism belongs to the second half of the 17th century, when the centralization of absolutist power reached its peak.Progressive tendencies in the architecture of French classicism of the 17th century were fully and comprehensively developed in the ensemble of Versailles, grandiose in scale, boldness and breadth of artistic design (16681689).

;font-family:"Arial";color:#333333;background:#ffffff">The pinnacle of classicism in 17th-century French architecture was the Versailles Palace and Park Ensemble, a grandiose state residence of French kings built near Paris. The history of Versailles begins in 1623 from a very modest feudal-like hunting castle, built of brick, stone and roofing slate at the request of Louis XIII.;font-family:"Arial";color:#6699cc;background:#ffffff">Louis Leveaux;font-family:"Arial";color:#333333;background:#ffffff"> (c. 161270) and famous garden and park decorator;font-family:"Arial";color:#6699cc;background:#ffffff">André Le Nôtra;font-family:"Arial";color:#333333;background:#ffffff"> (16131700) Modifying and expanding the original modest castle, Levo creates a composition that is imaginative in plan with an imposing façade overlooking the park, over the design of which works Le Nôtre. A colossal order, which has long belonged to the typical and favorite means of Levo, is placed on the basement. However, the architect tried to bring some freedom and liveliness into the solemn architectural spectacle: the garden and park facade of Levo had a terrace on the second floor, where it was later built;font-family:"Arial";color:#6699cc;background:#ffffff">Mirror Gallery;font-family:"Arial";color:#333333;background:#ffffff">. As a result of the second building cycle, Versailles formed into an integral palace and park ensemble, which was a wonderful example of the synthesis of the arts architecture, sculpture and garden and park art In 167889 the ensemble of Versailles was rebuilt under the direction of the greatest architect of the end of the century;font-family:"Arial";color:#6699cc;background:#ffffff">Jules Hardouin-Mansart;font-family:"Arial";color:#333333;background:#ffffff"> (1b4b1708) Hardouin-Mansart further enlarged the palace by erecting two five-hundred-meter-long wings at right angles to the south and north façades Hardouin-Mansart built two more floors above the terrace of Levoux, creating along the western facade the famous;font-family:"Arial";color:#6699cc;background:#ffffff">Mirror Gallery;font-family:"Arial";color:#333333;background:#ffffff">, ending with the Halls of War and Peace (168086). Hardouin-Mansart also built two corps of Ministers (167181), which formed the so-called "Court of the Ministers", and connected these buildings with a rich gilded lattice. The architect designed all the buildings in the same style. The facades of the buildings were divided into three tiers. The lower one, modeled on the Italian Renaissance palace-palazzo, is decorated with rustication, the middle the largest is filled with high arched windows , between which are columns and pilasters.The upper tier is shortened, it ends with a balustrade (a fence consisting of a number of figured columns connected by railings) and sculptural groups that create a feeling of magnificent decoration, although all facades have a strict appearance.All this completely changed the appearance of the building , although Hardouin-Mansart left the same height of the building.Gone are the contrasts, the freedom of fantasy, nothing is left but an extended horizontal three-story building, united in the system of its façades hells with basement, front and attic floors. The impression of grandeur that this brilliant architecture produces is achieved by the large scale of the whole, by the simple and calm rhythm of the whole composition. Hardouin-Mansart knew how to combine various elements into a single artistic whole. He had an amazing sense of ensemble, striving for rigor in decoration. For example, in;font-family:"Arial";color:#6699cc;background:#ffffff">Mirror Gallery;font-family:"Arial";color:#333333;background:#ffffff"> he applied a single architectural motif uniform alternation of piers with openings. Such a classicist basis creates a feeling of clear form. Thanks to Hardouin-Mansart, the expansion of the Palace of Versailles acquired a natural character The extensions were strongly connected with the central buildings.The ensemble, outstanding in terms of architectural and artistic qualities, was successfully completed and had a great influence on the development of world architecture.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">One ​​of the works of architecture of the second half of the 17th century, in which the predominance of mature artistic principles of classicism is already clearly felt, is the country ensemble of the palace and park of Vaux-le-Vicomte near Melun (1655 -1661).

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">The creators of this outstanding work, built for the general controller of finances Fouquet, were the architect Louis Leveaux (c. 1612-1670), the master of landscape art André Le Nôtre, who planned the park of the palace , and the painter Charles Lebrun, who took part in decorating the interiors of the palace and painting the plafonds.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">In the structure and appearance of the building, as well as in the composition of the ensemble as a whole, there is undoubtedly a more consistent application of classic architectural principles.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">This is manifested primarily in the logical and strictly calculated planning solution of the palace and the park as a whole. The large oval-shaped salon, which forms the central link of the suite of front rooms, has become the compositional center not only of the palace, but also of the ensemble as a whole, since its position at the intersection of the main planning axes of the ensemble (the main park alley running from the palace and the transverse ones, coinciding with the longitudinal axis of the building) makes it the "focus" of the entire complex.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">Thus, the building of the palace and the park are subject to a strictly centralized compositional principle, which allows bringing the various elements of the ensemble to artistic unity and highlighting the palace as the main component of the ensemble.

;font-family:"Arial";color:#000000">For the composition of the palace, the unity of the internal space and volume of the building is typical, which distinguishes works of mature classical architecture. the tranquility of the silhouette of the building.The introduction of a large order of pilasters, covering two floors above the base, and a powerful horizontal of a smooth, strict classical entablature in profiles, the predominance of horizontal articulations over vertical ones in the facades, the integrity of order facades and volumetric composition, not characteristic of castles of an earlier period. gives the appearance of the palace monumental representativeness and splendor.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

Architecture in FranceXVIIcentury. Style definition problem

Introduction

The great geographical discoveries, begun back in the Renaissance, followed by the colonization of the New World, then the victory of heliocentric cosmogony, theories of the infinity of worlds were supposed to shake people's minds, change their worldview. Renaissance anthropocentrism and naive faith in the harmony of the world no longer met the spiritual needs of man. If anthropocentrism remains unshakable, then where is this center in the infinity of the Universe? “The whole visible world is just a barely perceptible touch in the vast bosom of nature. Man in infinity - what does he mean? - Pascal wrote in the 17th century, as if in response to the Renaissance idea of ​​man as a “great miracle”, which God placed at the head of the world. In the 17th century, man already understands that he is neither the center of the universe nor the measure of all things.

The difference in understanding of the place, role and capabilities of a person distinguishes, first of all, the art of the 17th century from the Renaissance. This different attitude towards man is expressed with extraordinary clarity and precision by the same great French thinker Pascal: "Man is just a reed, the weakest of the creatures of nature, but he is a thinking reed." Man created the most powerful absolutist states in Europe in the 17th century, formed the worldview of the bourgeois, who was to become one of the main customers and connoisseurs of art in subsequent times. The complexity and inconsistency of the era of intensive formation of absolutist nation-states in Europe determined the nature of the new culture, which is usually associated in the history of art with the Baroque style, but which is not limited to this style alone. The 17th century is not only baroque art, but also classicism and realism [Ilyina 2000: 102] .

1. Architectural style in France 17th century

The history of art is sometimes seen as a history of successive styles. The semicircular arches of the Romanesque style were replaced by Gothic lancet arches, later the Renaissance, which originated in Italy, spread throughout Europe, defeating the Gothic. At the end of the Renaissance, a style arose that received the name "Baroque". However, if the previous styles have easily distinguishable features, it is not so easy to determine the features of the Baroque. The fact is that throughout the historical period from the Renaissance to the 20th century, architects operated with the same forms drawn from the arsenal of ancient architecture - columns, pilasters, cornices, relief decor and so on. In a certain sense, it would be fair to say that the Renaissance style dominated from the beginning of Brunelleschi's activity until our time, and in many works on architecture this entire period is designated by the concept of "Renaissance". Of course, over such a long time, tastes, and with them architectural forms, have undergone significant changes, and in order to reflect these changes, there was a need for smaller style categories.

It is curious that many of the concepts denoting styles were at first just abusive, contemptuous nicknames. Thus, the Italians of the Renaissance called "Gothic" a style that they considered barbaric, brought by the tribes of the Goths - the destroyers of the Roman Empire. In the word "mannerism" we can still distinguish the original meaning of mannerism, superficial imitation, which critics of the 17th century accused of artists of the previous period. The word "baroque", meaning "bizarre", "absurd", "strange", also arose later as a caustic mockery in the fight against the style of the 17th century. This label was used by those who considered arbitrary combinations of classical forms in architecture unacceptable. With the word "baroque" they branded masterful deviations from the strict norms of the classics, which for them was tantamount to bad taste. It is no longer so easy to see the differences between these trends in architecture. We are accustomed to constructions in which there is both a daring challenge to classical rules and their complete misunderstanding [Gombrich 1998: 289].

Art historians cannot come to a consensus regarding the style in the art of that time. The main question is how to distinguish between such concepts as baroque and classicism. Let's make a reservation right away that for different countries, works of art that are attributed to a particular style will have their own characteristics. It is worth noting that the existence of style in different parts of Europe has its own duration, which means that the time frame will be blurred. Let us turn to one of the modern dictionaries to identify the main features of the Baroque. Baroque- (from Italian barocco - bizarre, strange), an artistic style that occupied a leading position in European art from the end of the 16th to the middle of the 18th centuries. Born in Italy. The term was introduced at the end of the 19th century by Swiss art historians J. Burkhardt and G. Wölfflin. The style embraced all types of creativity: literature, music, theater, but was especially pronounced in architecture, fine and decorative arts. The renaissance sense of the clear harmony of the universe was replaced by a dramatic understanding of the conflict of being, the infinite diversity, the immensity and constant variability of the world around us, the power over man of powerful natural elements. The expressiveness of baroque works is often built on contrasts, dramatic clashes between the sublime and the base, the majestic and the insignificant, the beautiful and the ugly, the illusory and the real, light and darkness. A penchant for composing complex and wordy allegories coexisted with extreme naturalism. Baroque works of art were distinguished by redundancy of forms, passion and intensity of images. As never before, there was a strong feeling of the “theater of life”: fireworks, masquerades, a passion for dressing up, reincarnations, all kinds of “tricks” brought a playful beginning, unprecedented entertainment and bright festivity into a person’s life [National Historical Encyclopedia: http://interpretive.ru /dictionary/968/word/baroko].

In his book Baroque. Architecture between 1600 and 1750" Frederic Dassa writes: "The term "baroque" cannot be given a specific definition, and the question arises whether it is worth doing. In many respects, this problem belongs more to historiography than to history. The concept of baroque, developed in the last century for the rehabilitation of two centuries of Italian art, cannot be transferred to the study of Spanish, Dutch, English or French art, whose significance is not determined by a more or less pronounced desire to imitate Roman or Turin artists and architects" [Dassa 2002 : 127]. Koch writes that: “The style of this absolutist era - from about 1600 to 1800 - is baroque<…>Throughout Europe, the Baroque permeates everything: sculpture and painting, which fit seamlessly and with transitional periods into architectural structures, music, which gives the final touch of splendor, fanatical religiosity at court and church holidays, literature, as well as in such ordinary things as furniture, clothing or hairstyles, manner of speaking. Baroque art appeals to the whole society and is personified by it” [Koch 2005: 236]. An important detail in Koch's research is that he identifies several currents in this period: the Baroque current and the classical current, which determines the development of architecture primarily in France and northern Europe. Indeed, the Baroque style with its usual features did not receive such development in France as it did in Italy, therefore there is a point of view that the Baroque style did not develop here at all, and Baroque monuments are classified as monuments of classicism.

Let us turn to one of the modern editions of the French dictionary "Le Petit Robert des noms propres" to introduce the concept of "classicism" into our work. “Classicism is a term that applies in a narrow sense to French literature and art during the reign of Louis XIV, and in a broader sense defines the aesthetic ideal of rigor and restraint that has been inherent in numerous writers and artists of France and other countries since the 17th century.” In the same dictionary entry, in the section on architecture, “le premier classicisme” (literally “first classicism”) and “le second classicisme” (literally “second classicism”) are distinguished, which is associated with the difference in the development of architecture in the period before the reign of Louis XIV, when French classicism was still strongly influenced by the art of Italy, and directly during the reign of the "Sun King".

The 17th century is the time of the formation of a single French state, the French nation. In the second half of the century, France is the most powerful absolutist power in Western Europe. This is also the time of the formation of the French national school in the visual arts, the formation of the classicist trend, whose birthplace is rightfully considered France [Ilyina 2000: 129].

Studying the issue of style in the architecture of the 17th century in France, one can also come across such a concept as “baroque classicism”, which, in our opinion, can reconcile two different views on the style in architecture of that period. However, in this work we will adhere to the point of view presented in the General Encyclopedia of Arts, namely, to define the architectural style in France of the 17th century as classicism and to single out two periods of its development.

2. Architecture of the first halfXVIIcentury

2 .1 Urban planning in France during the era of absolutism

architectural style classicism baroque

In the first half and the middle of the 17th century, the principles of classicism took shape and gradually took root in French architecture. The state system of absolutism also contributes to this.

Construction and control over it are concentrated in the hands of the state. A new post of "Architect of the King" and "First Architect of the King" is introduced. Huge amounts of money are spent on construction. Government agencies control construction not only in Paris, but also in the provinces.

Town-planning works are widely deployed throughout the country. New cities arise as military outposts or settlements near the palaces and castles of the kings and rulers of France. In most cases, new cities are designed as square or rectangular in plan, or as more complex polygonal shapes formed by defensive walls, ditches, bastions, and towers. Inside them, a strictly regular rectangular or radial-circular system of streets with a city square in the center is planned. Examples include the cities of Vitry Vitry-le-Francois, Saarlouis, Henrichemont, Marl, Richelieu, etc. [cm. Application fig. 12].

The old medieval cities are being rebuilt on the basis of new principles of regular planning. Direct highways are being laid, urban ensembles and geometrically regular squares are being erected on the site of a disorderly network of medieval streets.

In the urban planning of the era of classicism, the main problem is a large urban ensemble with development carried out according to a single plan. In 1615 in Paris, the first planning work was carried out in the northwestern part of the city, the island of Saint-Louis was built up. New bridges are being erected and the boundaries of the city are expanding.

On the left and right banks of the Seine, large palace complexes are being built - the Luxembourg Palace and the Palais Royal Palace (1624, architect - J. Lemercier). The further development of urban planning in Paris was expressed in the creation of two regular squares (square and triangular) included in the medieval building of the city: Royal Square (1606-1612, architect - L. Metezo) and Dauphine Square (begun in 1605) in western part of the Island of the City [Bykov, Kaptereva 1969: http://artyx.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000022/index.shtml].

2 .2 Formation of the principles of classicism

The principles of classicism, the ground for which was prepared by the architects of the French and Italian Renaissance, in the first half of the 17th century were not yet distinguished by integrity and uniformity. They often mixed with the traditions of the Italian Baroque, whose buildings are characterized by the complicated shape of triangular and curvilinear pediments, an abundance of sculptural decoration and cartouches, especially in interior decoration.

Medieval traditions were so strong that even classical orders acquired a peculiar interpretation in the buildings of the first half of the century. The composition of the order - its location on the surface of the wall, proportions and details - obeys the structure of the wall that has developed in Gothic architecture, with its clearly defined vertical elements of the supporting frame of the building (piers) and large window openings located between them. This motif, combined with the subdivision of facades with the help of corner and central risalits, gives the building a vertical aspiration that is not characteristic of the classical system of order compositions and a clear, calm silhouette of the volume.

Baroque techniques are combined with the traditions of French Gothic and the new classicist principles of understanding beauty. Many religious buildings, built according to the type of basilica church established in the Italian Baroque, received magnificent main facades, decorated with orders of columns and pilasters, with numerous crepes, sculptural inserts and volutes. An example is the Church of the Sorbonne, the first cult building in Paris topped with a dome [Bykov, Kaptereva 1969: http://artyx.ru/books/item/f00/z0000022/index.shtml].

2 .3 Luxembourg Palace

One of the earliest palace structures was the Luxembourg Palace (1615-1620), built by Solomon de Bros for Marie de Medici. A magnificent park was laid out near the palace, which was considered one of the best at the beginning of the 17th century.

The composition of the palace is characterized by the placement of the main and lower outbuildings around the large front palace. One side of the main building faces the front courtyard, the other - to the park. The three-dimensional composition of the palace clearly showed the traditional features typical of the French palace architecture of the first half of the 17th century, for example, the allocation of corner and central volumes topped with high roofs in the main three-story building of the palace, as well as the division of the internal space of the corner towers into completely identical residential sections.

The appearance of the palace, in some features of which there is still a similarity with the castles of the previous century, thanks to a regular and clear compositional construction, as well as a clear rhythmic structure of two-tier orders that divide the facades, is distinguished by monumentality and representativeness.

The massiveness of the walls is emphasized by horizontal rustication, completely covering the walls and order elements. This technique, borrowed from the masters of the Italian Baroque, received a peculiar sound in the work of de Bros, imparting special richness and splendor to the appearance of the palace [see. Application fig. 3].

Among other works of de Bros, the Church of Saint-Gervais (begun in 1616) in Paris occupies a prominent place. This church, built according to the plan of Italian Baroque churches, combines traditional elements of Baroque church facades with Gothic elongated proportions [Bykov, Kaptereva 1969: http://artyx.ru/books/item/f00/z0000022/index.shtml].

2 .4 City of Richelieu

Early examples of large ensemble compositions date back to the first half of the 17th century. The creator of the first ensemble of the palace, park and city of Richelieu in the architecture of French classicism (begun in 1627) was Jacques Lemercier.

The layout of the ensemble, which has not survived, was based on the intersection of two compositional axes at an angle. One of them coincides with the main street of the city and the park alley connecting the city with the square in front of the palace, the other is the main axis of the palace and the park. The layout of the park is built on a strictly regular system of alleys intersecting at right angles or diverging from one center.

Set aside from the palace, the city of Richelieu was surrounded by a wall and a moat, forming a rectangle in plan. The layout of the streets and quarters of the city is subject to the same strict system of rectangular coordinates as the ensemble as a whole, which indicates the addition of new urban planning principles in the first half of the 17th century and the overcoming of medieval city building methods with crooked narrow streets and small cramped squares.

The building of the Richelieu Palace was divided into the main building and outbuildings, which formed in front of it a large enclosed rectangular courtyard with a main entrance. The main building with wings, according to a tradition dating back to medieval castles, was surrounded by a moat filled with water. The layout and three-dimensional composition of the main building and outbuildings with clearly defined tower-shaped corner volumes, completed by high pyramidal roofs, were close to the Luxembourg Palace discussed above, which indicates the influence of the Middle Ages.

The Palais de Richelieu, as well as its regular park with deep perspectives of the alleys, extensive parterre and sculpture, was created as a majestic monument, designed to glorify the all-powerful ruler of France. The interiors of the palace were richly decorated with stucco and paintings, which exalted the personality of Richelieu and his deeds [see. Application fig. 4].

The ensemble of the palace and the city of Richelieu was still not sufficiently imbued with unity, however, on the whole, Lemercier managed to create a new type of complex and strict spatial composition, unknown to the architecture of the Italian Renaissance and Baroque [Bykov, Kaptereva 1969: http://artyx.ru/books/item/f00 /s00/z0000022/index.shtml].

2 .5 Creations by François Mansart

Along with Lemercier, the largest architect of the first half of the century was Francois Mansart (1598-1666). Among his outstanding works is the Maisons-Laffitte Palace (1642-1650), built not far from Paris for the president of the Parisian parliament, Rene de Languey. Unlike the traditional compositions of earlier country castles, there is no closed courtyard here, formed by the main building and outbuildings. All office space is located on the ground floor of the building.

The monumental volume of the palace, crowned according to ancient tradition with high pyramidal roofs over the side and central risalits, is distinguished by its compact integrity and expressive silhouette. The building is surrounded by a moat filled with water, and its location, as it were, on an island in a beautiful water frame, well connects the palace with the natural park environment, emphasizing its dominance in the composition of the ensemble. The architecture of the Maisons-Laffitte palace is complemented by a regular French park with an extensive parterre, bosquets and dense green spaces [see. Application fig. five].

Another major work of Francois Mansart is the church of the convent Val de Grasse (1645-1665), built after his death. The composition of the plan is based on the traditional scheme of a domed basilica with a wide central nave, covered with a cylindrical vault, a transept and a dome on the middle cross. As in many other French religious buildings of the 17th century, the facade of the building goes back to the traditional solution of the church facade by Italian Baroque architecture. The dome of the church, raised on a high drum, is one of the three highest domes in Paris [see. Application fig. 6].

In 1630, Francois Mansart introduced into the practice of building a city dwelling a high broken roof shape using an attic for housing (hence the concept of "attic").

Thus, in the first half of the 17th century, both in the field of urban planning and in the formation of the types of buildings themselves, a new style was maturing, and conditions were created for its flourishing in the second half of the century [Bykov, Kaptereva 1969: http://artyx.ru /books/item/f00/s00/z0000022/index.shtml].

3. Second half of the 17th century

3 .1 Great age, characteristics of the period

In the second half of the 17th century, the absolute monarchy in France reaches its greatest economic and political power and outward flourishing. This is the time of the long reign of Louis XIV, the "Sun King". No wonder this time was called in Western literature "Le grand sícle" - "The Great Age". Great - first of all by the splendor of the ceremonial and all kinds of arts, in different genres and in different ways glorifying the person of the king. From the beginning of the independent reign of Louis XIV, i.e. Since the 60s of the 17th century, a very important process of regulation, complete subordination and control by the royal power, has been going on in art, which is very important for its further development. Created back in 1648, the Academy of Painting and Sculpture is now officially administered by the first minister of the king. In 1671, the Academy of Architecture was founded, control was established over all types of artistic life [Ilyina 2000: 138] .

Despite the control by the authorities, the second half of the 17th century for the architecture of France is the time of its heyday. In Paris, extensive city squares and large palace, public and religious buildings are being reconstructed and rebuilt. Grandiose expensive construction work is being carried out to create the country residence of the king - Versailles.

One of the reasons for the leading position of architecture among other arts in the second half of the 17th century was rooted in its specific features. It was architecture that could most fully and forcefully express the ideas of this stage in the development of a centralized national monarchy. During this period, the organizing role of architecture in the artistic synthesis of all types of fine arts was especially clearly manifested. Architecture had a huge impact on the formation of decorative sculpture, painting and applied art of this time.

New artistic features in the architecture of the middle and second half of the 17th century, which developed within the framework of classicism, are manifested, first of all, in the huge spatial scope of buildings and ensembles, in the more consistent application of the classical order system, in the predominance of horizontal divisions over vertical ones, in greater integrity and unity. volumetric composition and internal space of the building. Along with the classical heritage of antiquity and the Renaissance, the Italian Baroque architecture had a great influence on the creation of the style of French classicism of the second half of the 17th century. This was reflected in the borrowing of certain architectural forms (curved pediments, volutes, magnificent cartouches), in the order compositions of the facades and the principles for solving their internal space (enfilade), in some features of the planning of large ensembles (longitudinal-axial construction), as well as in the inherent architecture French classicism increased pomposity of architectural forms, especially in interiors. However, the forms of classical and baroque architecture were radically reworked in the 17th century in connection with national artistic traditions, which made it possible to bring these often contradictory elements to artistic unity [Bykov 1963: 487-513].

3 .2 Vaux-le-Vicomte

The first work of French classicism architecture of the second half of the 17th century, in which the predominance of the artistic principles of classicism over old traditions, was the ensemble of the palace and park of Vaux-le-Vicomte (1655-1661). The architects Louis Leveau, André Le Nôtre and the painter Charles Lebrun were the creators of this remarkable work, built for the inspector general of finances Fouquet and in many ways anticipating the ensemble of Versailles.

According to the composition of the plan, the allocation of the central and corner tower-shaped volumes, crowned with high roofs, the general open character of the building, surrounded by a moat filled with water, the palace of Vaux-le-Vicomte resembles the palace of Maisons-Laffite. As in Maisons-Laffitte, the architecture of this palace still retains some of the traditional features of French architecture dating back to past centuries. Nevertheless, in the appearance of the building, as well as in the compositional ensemble as a whole, there is undoubtedly a triumph of classical architectural principles. This is manifested, first of all, in a logical and strictly verified planning decision of the palace and park. The building and the park are subject to a strictly centralizing compositional principle, which makes it possible to bring the various elements of the Vaux-le-Vicomte ensemble to a great artistic unity and to single out the palace as the most important component of the ensemble.

The unity in the construction of the internal space and volume of the building is typical of the principles of classic architecture. The large oval salon is singled out as the center of the composition and crowned with a domed roof, which gives its silhouette a calm, balanced character. The introduction of a large order of pilasters, covering two floors above the basement, and a powerful horizontal of a smooth, strict classical entablature in profiles achieve the predominance of horizontal divisions over vertical ones, generalization and integrity of the facades and volume of the building, unusual for palaces of an earlier period. All this gives the appearance of the palace a monumental representativeness and splendor.

The park ensemble of the Vaux-le-Viscount Palace was built according to a single, strictly regular system. Skillfully trimmed green spaces, alleys, flower beds, paths form clear, easily perceived geometric shapes and lines. Fountains and decorative statues frame a vast parterre and a pool with a grotto, spread out in front of the palace facade [see fig. Application fig. 7].

In the ensemble of Vaux-le-Vicomte, peculiar principles of the synthesis of architecture, sculpture, painting and gardening art created by French classicism of the 17th century were formed, which gained even greater scope and maturity in the ensemble of Versailles [Bykov 1963: 487-513].

3 .3 East facade of the Louvre

One of the first works of the second half of the 17th century, in which the fundamental principles of French classicism were most fully expressed, is the eastern facade of the Louvre (1667-1678), in the design and construction of which François d'Orbe (1634-1697), Louis Leveau and Claude participated Perrault (1613-1688).

The eastern facade of the Louvre, which is often called the Louvre Colonnade, is part of the ensemble of two palaces united in the 17th century - the Tuileries and the Louvre. The façade of great length (173 m) has a central and two side risalits, between which powerful (12 m high) double Corinthian columns rest on a monumental smooth plinth with rare openings, forming, together with the wall receding deep into, deep shaded loggias. The richest in its forms, decor and articulations, the rizalit of the central entrance with a three-span portico is crowned with a triangular pediment. The tympanum of the pediment is richly decorated with sculptural relief. The flat architectural relief of the side projections creates a logical transition to the side facades of the Louvre, which repeated the composition of the eastern facade, with the difference that the double Corinthian columns were replaced in them by single pilasters of the same order [Bykov 1963: 487-513].

The monumental façade of the building, with its enlarged forms and emphasized scale, is full of grandeur and nobility, but at the same time, it has a hint of rational coldness, characteristic of mature classicism [Bykov 1963: 487-513].

3 .4 The works of Hardouin-Mansart

The problem of the architectural ensemble, which had been in the center of attention of the masters of classicism of the 17th century for almost the entire century, found its expression in French urban planning. One of the clearest examples of the skillful resolution of large urban planning tasks is the construction by Hardouin-Mansart of the Church of Les Invalides (1693-1706), which completes the huge complex built according to the project of Liberal Bruant (c. 1635-1697).

The Les Invalides, designed to accommodate war veterans' hostels, is conceived as one of the most grandiose public buildings of the 17th century. In front of the main facade of the building, located on the left bank of the Seine, extends a vast area, the so-called Esplanade des Invalides. The strictly symmetrical complex of the Les Invalides consists of four-storey buildings closed around the perimeter, forming a developed system of large rectangular and square courtyards, subordinate to a single compositional center - a large courtyard and a monumental church associated with it.

The church is a centric building with a square plan and a large, 27 m in diameter, dome, which crowns the vast central space. In the strict and restrained in its forms, the architecture of the temple still feels the influence of baroque compositions not alien to the work of Hardouin-Mansart. This is reflected in the weighted proportions of the dome in relation to the lower volume and in the plastic enrichment of the central part of the facade with order elements, characteristic of the Baroque [see. Application fig. eight].

Place Louis the Great (later Place Vendôme) (1685-1701) and Place des Victories (1684-1687) built according to the designs of the architect Hardouin-Mansart are of great importance for the French urban planning practice of the 17th century.

Having the shape of a rectangle with cut corners, Place Louis the Great was conceived as a grand building in honor of the king. In accordance with the plan, the equestrian statue of Louis XIV, located in the center of the square, played a dominant role in the composition. The facades of the buildings forming the square, of the same type in composition, with slightly protruding porticos at the cut corners and in the central part of the buildings, serve as an architectural frame for the space of the square. Connected to the adjacent blocks by only two short stretches of streets, the square is perceived as a closed, isolated space [see Fig. Application fig. nine].

Another ensemble is Victory Square, which has the shape of a circle with a diameter of 60 m in terms of the uniformity of the facades surrounding the square and the location of the monument in the center is close to Louis the Great Square. However, the location of the square at the intersection of several streets, actively connected with the general system of city planning, deprives it of isolation and isolation.

With the creation of Victory Square, Hardouin-Mansart laid the foundations for progressive urban planning trends in the construction of open public centers closely related to the planning system of the city [Bykov 1963: 487-513].

3 .5 Versailles

The progressive tendencies in the architecture of French classicism of the 17th century are fully and comprehensively developed in the ensemble of Versailles (1668-1689), grandiose in scale, courage and breadth of artistic design. The main creators of this most significant monument of French classicism of the 17th century were Hardouin-Mansart and the master of landscape art Andre Le Nôtre (1613-1700).

Versailles, as the main residence of the king, was supposed to exalt and glorify the boundless power of French absolutism. The features of building a complex ensemble as a strictly ordered centralized system based on the absolute compositional dominance of the palace over everything around are due to its general ideological design.

To the Palace of Versailles, located on a terrace towering above the surrounding area, three wide, completely straight radial avenues of the city converge - thus, Versailles was connected by roads approaching it with different regions of France.

Adjacent to the main building from the side of the city, palace services were located in two large independent buildings, forming a large rectangular square in front of the central building of the palace.

Luxurious interior decoration, which widely used baroque motifs (round and oval medallions, complex cartouches, ornamental fillings above doors and in piers) and expensive finishing materials (mirrors, chased bronze, marble, gilded wooden carvings), widespread use of decorative painting - all this is designed to create an impression of grandeur and splendor. One of the most remarkable rooms of the Palace of Versailles is built by Hardouin-Mansart and located on the second floor of the central part of the magnificent Mirror Gallery (73 m long) with adjoining square living rooms. Through the wide arched openings, a magnificent view of the main alley of the park and the surrounding landscape opens up. The inner space of the gallery is illusoryly expanded by a number of large mirrors located in niches opposite the windows. The interior of the gallery is richly decorated with Corinthian marble pilasters and a magnificent stucco cornice, which serves as a transition to the Baroque plafond of the artist Lebrun, even more complex in composition and color scheme [see fig. Application fig. 10].

The architecture of the facades created by Hardouin-Mansart, especially from the side of the park, is distinguished by great unity. Strongly stretched horizontally, the building of the palace harmonizes well with the strict geometrically correct layout of the park and the natural environment. In the composition of the facade, the second, front floor of the palace is clearly distinguished, dissected by a strict order of columns and pilasters, resting on a heavy rusticated plinth, by a strict order of proportions and details.

In contrast to the architecture of the facades of the palace, which are not devoid of a somewhat Baroque representativeness, as well as the interiors overloaded with decorations and gilding, the layout of the park, made by Le Nôtre, is distinguished by classical purity and clarity of lines and forms. In the layout of the park and the forms of its "green architecture" Le Nôtre was the most consistent expression of the aesthetic and ethical ideal of classicism. He saw the natural environment as an object of intelligent human activity. Le Nôtre transforms the natural landscape into an impeccably clear, complete architectonic system based on the principles of rationality and order [see. Application fig. eleven].

A general view of the park opens from the side of the palace. From the main terrace, a wide staircase leads along the main axis of the composition of the ensemble to the Latona Fountain, then the Royal Alley, bordered by cut trees, leads to the Apollo Fountain. The composition ends with a large canal stretching towards the horizon, framed by alleys of trimmed trees.

In organic unity with the layout of the park and the architectural appearance of the palace, there is a rich and varied sculptural decoration of the park. The park sculpture of Versailles is actively involved in the formation of the ensemble. The architectural image of the ensemble of Versailles is built in an organic connection with the natural environment, in the regular and consistent disclosure of various internal and external perspective aspects, in the synthesis of architecture, sculpture and painting [Bykov 1963: 487-513].

Conclusion

The 17th century is one of the brightest epochs in the development of Western European artistic culture. This is a time of brilliant flowering of a number of major national schools, a multitude of creative trends and a constellation of great names and famous masters, truly extraordinary for one century. The most significant and valuable thing that was created by this era is primarily associated with the art of five European countries - Italy, Spain, Flanders, Holland and France.

The difference between the 17th century and the previous 16th century was that none of these countries now occupied an unconditionally dominant position in the general evolution of artistic culture. Nevertheless, one cannot fail to note the special role of the two countries in the initial and final stages of this stage. So, speaking of its initial phase, first of all we have to name Italy. The country of ancient ancient culture, the cradle of the Renaissance, Italy became a place of pilgrimage for all artists of the world in the 17th century. It is even more important that in the Italian art of the first half of the 17th century new figurative and stylistic foundations of architecture, sculpture and painting were laid, which met the requirements of their time and therefore received a pan-European response. One has only to remember how much the Italian Baroque contributed to all types of plastic arts, how much the realism of Caravaggio enriched European painting.

What Italy was for the first half of the 17th century, France became for the second half of the century, giving models for other European countries in its artistic achievements. Since the turn of the 16th and 17th centuries, her art has passed a long and difficult path, marked by the creative activity of many famous masters.

In no other European country did artistic culture find itself in such close connection with the development of absolutism as in France. To a large extent, this was due to the fact that it was France that was the classical country of absolutism, the historical role of which at a certain stage of social development was largely progressive. Under these conditions, the idea of ​​state unity, which met the requirements of a growing and independent French nation, acquired a particularly important meaning.

The essential features of the era were most profoundly reflected in the art of classicism. This complex and contradictory style manifested itself in different ways in drama and poetry, in architecture and fine arts [Bykov, Kaptereva 1969: http://artyx.ru/books/item/f00/z00022/index.shtml].

Bibliographic list

Literature

1. Bykov V.E. Art of France, architecture // General history of arts in 6 volumes / otv. ed. R.B. Klimov, I.I. Nikonov. Volume 4: Art of the 17th - 18th centuries. - M.: Art, 1963. 1101 p.

2. Bykov V.E., Kaptereva T.P. French art of the 17th century. - M.: Art, 1969 URL: http://artyx.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000022/index.shtml

3. Gombrich E. History of Art. - M.: Publishing house ACT, 1998. 688 p.

4. Dass F. Baroque. Architecture between 1600 and 1750. - M.: Astrel Publishing House, 2002. 160 p.

5. Ilyina T.V. Art history. Western European art. - M.: Higher. school, 2000. 368 p.

6. Koch F. Encyclopedia of architectural styles. - M.: BMM AO, 2005. 528 p.

Dictionaries and reference books

7. Le Petit Robert des noms propres, Varese, La tipografica Varese, 2010.

Internet resources

8. National Historical Encyclopedia. http://interpretive.ru/

Illustrations

9. Illustrations 1-2: Architecture and urban planning URL: http://townevolution.ru/books/item/f00/z0021/st030.shtml

10. Illustrations 3-8, 11: General history of arts in 6 volumes / holes. ed. R.B. Klimov, I.I. Nikonov. Volume 4: Art of the 17th - 18th centuries. - M.: Art, 1963. 1101 p.

11. Illustrations 9-10 URL: http://www.mafrance.ru/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/vandomskaya-ploshad.jpg

Application

Rice. 1 Plans of French fortified cities in the 17th century. Anrishmon

Rice. 2 City of Richelieu. Built according to the project of Jacques Lemercier in the early 30s of the XVII century. On the left - the park of the country castle of Cardinal Richelieu

Rice. 3 Salomon de Bros. Luxembourg Palace in Paris. 161 5 - 1620 (21)

Rice. 4 Jacques Lemercier. Richelieu Palace in Poitou. Begun in 1627 Engraving by Perel

Rice. 5 François Mansart. Palace of Maisons-Laffitte near Paris. 1642-1650. main facade

Rice. 6 Francois Mansart. Church of the Val de Grace in Paris. 1645-1665. Facade

Rice. 7 Louis Leveaux, André Le Nôtre. Palace and park of Vaux-le-Vicomte near Melun. 1655-1661 General view from the park.

Rice. 8 Jules Hardouin-Mansart. Church of Les Invalides in Paris. 1693-1706 Finished in 1708 by Robert de Cotte. View from the south

Rice. 9 Place Louis the Great (Place Vendôme)

Rice. 10 Mirror Gallery of the Palace of Versailles

Rice. 11 Versailles. View of the Royal Palace and park from the west. Architects Louis Leveaux, Jules Hardouin-Mansart, André Le Nôtre. aerial photography

Hosted on Allbest.ru

Similar Documents

The predominance of secular motifs in all spheres of the cultural life of Russia in the 17th century, including architecture. The tent as one of the most popular architectural forms of that time. Features of church architecture. Features of the "Moscow baroque" style.

abstract, added 03/20/2014


Characteristic features Moscow baroque (late 17th - first years of the 18th century). Features of the Naryshkin style. The use of architectural order elements and the use of centric compositions in temple architecture on the example of the Church of the Intercession in Fili.

presentation, added 05/22/2012


The spread of classicism in Russian architecture and monumental sculpture in the second half of the 19th century. The contradictions of capitalist urban planning, the growing gap between the center and the suburbs, between the shopping and factory workers' streets.

presentation, added 11/18/2014


Construction techniques of the masters of the XVII century. Palace of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich in Kolomenskoye near Moscow as an example of wooden architecture. Tent and cage churches. Tiered churches with tetrahedral upper tiers. The architecture of simple huts and a mansion made of wood.

abstract, added 01/11/2015


The development of classicism in Russia at the beginning of the second half of the 18th century. Description of the construction and architecture of the second half of the XIX century. A new stage in the urban planning of Moscow and St. Petersburg. The development of new building methods as the cause of the architectural crisis in the country.

term paper, added 07/27/2010


The essence and distinctive features of classicism as a trend in European art of the 17th–19th centuries, the historical characteristics of this style, construction features. Urban planning and architecture of classicism, types of structures and the objective world.

term paper, added 12/11/2013


Architecture of the first half of the 18th century: baroque. Baroque architecture of the middle of the 18th century. Prerequisites for the emergence and development of classicism. The architecture of early classicism (1760-1780). Architecture of strict classicism (1780-1800).

term paper, added 11/30/2003


Architecture of volumetric structures. Organization of landscape gardening space and landscape and park architecture. Baroque styles in the XVI-XVII centuries. Structural elements, stairs, doors, pillars and balconies in architecture. The origin of Gothic and its development.

abstract, added 05/04/2012


History of French architecture. Church architecture as the basis of the Gothic style. Changes in French Fine Art during the Renaissance. Examples of modern architecture with descriptions: Mont-St-Michel Church, St-Auben Abbey.

abstract, added 05/05/2016


Formation in the Romanesque era of the architectural style with the motif of a semicircular arch, the basilica type of the temple, massive walls and towers with tented completion. Relationship between German and Carolingian architecture. Romanesque and Gothic features of the transitional style.

In France, absolutism. Louis 14 said: "I am the state." A new philosophical direction is emerging - rationalism. Rene Descartes said: "I think, and therefore I am." On the basis of these ideas, a new style was formed - classicism, that is, it was based on a work of art, recognized as examples of perfection, an ideal. The whole system was built on the study of antiquity and renaissance.

Versailles Ensemble. The main idea: to create a special world, where it is subject to strict laws. The Versailles park has a strict order: green spaces are trimmed, flower beds form regular geometric shapes, alleys intersect at right angles.

Example, Place Vendôme. It is a closed small quadrangle with cut corners that surround administrative buildings with a single facade design. In the center is an equestrian statue of Louis 14. At the beginning of the 19th century, the statue was replaced with a triumphal column in honor of Napoleon. The idea of ​​the square is the glorification of the monarch and the dream of a perfectly ordered world, living according to his will.

At the beginning of the 18th century, a new style appeared - rococo(translated from French - shell).

Characteristic features: exquisite forms, bizarre lines, a world of feelings, subtle shades of mood.

The style did not last long - until the 40s of the 18th century. The style appeared mainly in interior design and country palaces.

Most buildings rococo style- these are rich city mansions - hotels. They had curvilinear outlines in plan and formed asymmetric compositions. The rooms were smaller than in palaces, the ceilings were lower, the windows were large almost to the floor, and mirrors or paintings with landscapes were placed in the piers. That is, there was a visual destruction of space. Example, Subise hotel in Paris.

From the middle of the 18th century, society returned to classicism again. Reasons: the beginning of the excavations of the city of Pompeii, the spread of the ideas of the Enlightenment. Enlighteners came to search for the ideal that they saw in the culture of ancient Greece and Rome. This style is called neoclassicism.

Architect - Jean-Ange Gabriel. Place de la Concorde in Paris (at that time Place Louis 15). This square is open to the city from the west and east, it is adjoined by the alleys of the avenue (the Champs Elysees and the Tuileries Park). From the south, the embankment of the river Seine. And only from the north side are the buildings of the palaces. In the center of the square is an equestrian statue of Louis 15. During the French Revolution, a guillotine was installed on the site of the statue. In 1836, the place of the guillotine was taken by an obelisk, 23 m high, brought from the temple of Ramses 2 in Thebes.

The most significant building in Paris was Church of Saint Genevieve, architect - Jacques Germain Souflo. In plan, the church was a Greek equal cross. The portico resembles that of the ancient Roman Pantheon. Length 110 m, width 83 m.

For neoclassicists, architecture was a way of rebuilding the world. Utopian projects appeared in which the ideas of the Enlightenment were embodied.

"Talking Architecture"

The art of the Enlightenment had to speak in order to convey a message to the viewer. For example, at the entrance to the bank building, powerful columns were supposed to speak about the reliability of the bank. The architects also used shapes that were difficult to understand: the cube as a symbol of justice, the ball as a symbol of public morality.

Newton's cenotaph. Architect - Louis Bullet(Cenotaph is a false grave of an unknown hero, appeared in ancient Rome). The shape of the building is associated with an apple or a globe.

Architect: Claude Nicolas Ledoux.Outposts of Paris(built).

Sho city project- a new social model of society. In terms of the city was an ellipse. In the center is the director's house, reminiscent of an ancient temple. Along the perimeter were houses for workers. There are public buildings: a market, a stock exchange, an arms factory, a lumberjack's house (pyramidally built of logs), a house of the director of the river source (a cylinder through which the riverbed passed) and others. There was also a temple of Virtue and a church, but not an ordinary one, but intended for various family rituals.

There were no prisons or hospitals in the city, because crime and disease would disappear in the future.

Most of the projects were utopian, so they were only on paper, they were called - paper architecture.