The auction did not take place further. The auction did not take place, no bids were submitted

Sometimes, for a number of reasons, an electronic auction under 44-FZ may not take place (more precisely, it will be declared invalid).

1. The auction did not take place if there is one participant in it
In this case, the customer concludes a contract with this participant as with the winner, provided that the second part of the application complies with the established requirements under 44-FZ and the auction documentation. Coordination with the regulatory authorities in this case is not required, since according to the conditions, one application is enough for a quorum, if it is executed correctly. Naturally, if you refuse, you will be held liable as if you had participated in a full tender with many participants and won it. If you submit a single bid and it fails, the customer must re-bid.

2. The auction did not take place if there are several participants in it
a) Suppose that there are several participants in the electronic auction, but only one of them satisfies the requirements for the second part of the application. Accordingly, in this case, the rule of paragraph “1” applies, that is, the state customer concludes a contract with this participant without approval from the regulatory authority.
b) There are several participants in the auction, but the state customer rejected all applications at the stage of consideration of the second parts. The solution is to conduct new auctions.

3. No bids have been submitted (there are no bidders in the auction)

According to part 4 of Art. 71 44-FZ, the customer can make a request for proposals for the auction. As part of the request for proposals after a failed auction, however, it is prohibited, however, to change the object of procurement (but at the same time it is formally possible, but not recommended, to change its cost, as well as the deadlines). A notice to the EIS must be submitted by the customer no later than 5 days (calendar) before the date of the request for proposals. At the same time, according to 44-FZ, the customer has the right to independently send invitations to participate in the procurement process to those persons who, in his opinion, are capable of fulfilling the terms of the contract. However, these persons in this case must be indispensable counterparties of the customer for at least 18 months before the date of the request for similar supplies.

4. The auction did not take place if all bids were rejected at the stage of consideration of the first parts
In theory, this is hardly possible, but in fact, anything can happen in electronic trading. Accordingly, in this case, the previous paragraph on the request for proposals applies. If out of all applications, based on the results of consideration of the first parts (and not the second), only one participant is admitted, then, according to Part 2 of Article 71, the problem is solved by agreement in the supervisory authority.

5. The auction did not take place, since none of the participants went to it
According to part 3 of article 71, the problem is solved by coordination with the regulatory authority (the first application that meets the conditions of the auction). If no application complies, or the application complies, but the participant is ready for termination, then a clause is applied that is suitable under the terms of 44-FZ:

"3. In the event that an electronic auction is declared invalid on the grounds provided for by Part 20 of Article 68 of this Federal Law due to the fact that within ten minutes after the start of such an auction, none of its participants submitted an offer on the contract price:

4) the contract is concluded in accordance with Clause 25 of Part 1 of Article 93 of this Federal Law in the manner established by Article 70 of this Federal Law, with a participant in such an auction, an application for participation in which is submitted:

a) earlier than other bids for participation in such an auction, if several participants in such an auction and the bids submitted by them are recognized as complying with the requirements of this Federal Law and documentation on such an auction.

Sometimes customers have to recognize the auction as invalid. What to do if the auction did not take place, because not a single application under 44-FZ has been submitted, we will show in the article.

Consequences of declaring an auction invalid

After analyzing Art. 71 of Law 44-FZ, there are two reasons why the electronic auction did not take place:

• no application has been submitted;
• one application has been submitted.

To get full access to the PRO-GOSZAKAZ.RU portal, please, register. It won't take more than a minute. Select a social network for quick authorization on the portal:

The further actions of the contract managers will depend on the reason why the competitive procedure was declared invalid:

• if there are no applications - to conduct a new purchase;
• if one application is submitted - draw up a state contract with the participant who submitted it.

Conclusion of a contract with a single supplier when the auction did not take place

In cases where:

• the application of one participant is submitted (part 16 of article 66);
• after analyzing the first parts of the submitted applications, only one of the participants who submitted their applications was admitted to the procedure (part 8 of article 67);
• the second part of the submitted application of only one of the participants in the procedure satisfies the conditions of the procurement (part 13 of article 69), a contract is drawn up with the person who submitted it.

The only condition will be the compliance of a single application with all the stated requirements.

Another reason for such a contract is the combination of circumstances when none of the eligible participants in the electronic procurement sent their offer with a price within ten minutes from the moment it began (part 20 of article 68).

Imagine the situation: no applications were submitted for the competition, only one application was submitted, or only one application meets the requirements of the documentation. In all cases, you must declare the competition void. But what to do next, if you are not ready to cancel the purchase, depends on the number of applications.
If the competition failed due to the fact that no one submitted a single application, you need to act according to one option. And if you yourself rejected all applications, you should do something completely different. And further, when you start receiving new applications, each time new conditions will be included depending on the number and quality of applications. Let us explain how, under different conditions, to choose the right method of purchase.

From the article

Clause 25, Part 1, Art. 93 of the Law on the COP establishes the rules for what to do according to 44-FZ if the purchase did not take place when drawing up a contract with a single supplier:

• draw up a government contract on the terms specified in the procurement documentation at a price not exceeding the initial price of the auction;
• the term of registration should not exceed 20 days from the date of publication of the final protocol.

Important

In this case, the signing of a contract with a single supplier is not subject to approval by the FAS and other regulatory authorities.

The electronic auction did not take place, because no applications

In accordance with part 4 of Art. 71 procedure did not take place if:

• not a single application has been submitted under 44-FZ (part 16 of article 66);
• there is no admission of any of the participants who submitted such an application (part 8 of article 67);
• all the second parts of the applications are incorrectly drawn up (part 13 of article 69);
• the participant who offered the best conditions after the winner avoided signing the state contract and refused to execute such a contract (part 15 of article 70).

If not a single application under 44-FZ has been submitted for the auction, what should I do next? A repurchase should be declared.

We held an electronic auction for the supply of wooden coffins. No one applied, so the auction was declared invalid. Now we want to try the request for proposals, but Law No. 44-FZ does not directly indicate whether we have the right to change the terms of the purchase. Can we reduce the NMTsK, add an advance payment condition, change the delivery time?

If no bids have been submitted for the auction

44-FZ in part 4 of Art. 71 contains the answer to the question of what to do next in this case:

• carry out repeated purchase, the method of which from July 1, 2018 can only be an electronic request for proposals. Until that time, the Law on the contract system allows for another procedure (for example, repeated auctions are often held);
• the item of re-purchase cannot be changed in comparison with the original one;
• re-schedule a new competitive procedure.

If the repeated auction did not take place - not a single application was submitted - what to do according to 44-FZ? Until July 1, 2018, it is possible to hold the 3rd auction or request for proposals or apply another competitive procedure under the Contract System Law.

If the auction did not take place 2 times, what should I do in this case? From July 1, 2018, this question will no longer exist, because. new edition of Part 4 of Art. 71 The law obliges to conduct repurchase in the form of an electronic request for proposals. If the request for proposals does not take place, then the state customer makes changes to the schedule and conducts another purchase.

Thus, the answer to the question: no bids have been submitted to the auction, what will happen next: to conduct a re-purchase, and from July 1, 2018 only in the form of an electronic request for proposals.

You will find more answers to questions about procurement in the new issue of the State Order in Questions and Answers magazine.

At the same time, in accordance with part 1 of article 2 of the Law, when purchasing goods, works, services, customers, in addition to the law itself, are guided by the provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the developed and approved procurement regulations.

In turn, the Civil Code in Part 5 of Article 447 gives a general definition of failed tenders (precisely tenders, and not all procurement procedures), which are understood as tenders in which only one participant took part.

In addition to the case of declaring a tender void as specified in Part 5 of Article 447 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, in the theory and practice of procurement activities there are also other grounds for declaring a tender void, in particular:
– if not a single application has been received within the period established by the documentation;
- only one participant from those who applied for participation in the auction was recognized as a participant in the relevant auction procedure;
– based on the results of consideration of applications for participation in the auction, all submitted applications of participants were rejected.

However, depending on the specific procurement procedure, the list of grounds for declaring a procurement void can be much wider. For example, when conducting a bidding (open tender, auction), the following grounds for declaring a bidding void may be provided:
1. At the end of the deadline for submitting applications for participation in the competition, no such application has been submitted;
2. Based on the results of consideration of applications for participation in the competition, the competition commission rejected all applications
3. Based on the results of the pre-qualification selection, none of the procurement participants was recognized as meeting the requirements established in the documentation.
4. At the end of the deadline for submitting applications for participation in the auction, not a single such application has been submitted.
5. Based on the results of consideration of the first parts of applications for participation in an electronic auction, the commission decided to refuse admission to participation in such an auction of all procurement participants.
6. Within a certain time after the start of such an auction, none of its participants submitted an offer on the price of the contract.

As can be seen from the above examples, these grounds for recognizing the auction as invalid determine the need for the customer to perform certain actions aimed either at holding repeated auctions or at conducting a new procurement procedure.

In the theory and practice of procurement activities, there are also other grounds for declaring a tender invalid:
1. At the end of the deadline for submitting applications for participation in the competition, only one application has been submitted, and such an application has been recognized as complying with the requirements of the documentation;
2. Based on the results of consideration of applications for participation in the tender, only one application was recognized as complying with the requirements of the documentation;
3. Based on the results of the pre-qualification selection, only one procurement participant was recognized as complying with the established requirements, and the application of such a participant was recognized as complying with the requirements of the documentation.
4. At the end of the deadline for submitting applications for participation in the auction, only one application has been submitted that meets the requirements of the documentation.
5. Based on the results of consideration of the first parts of applications for participation in an electronic auction, the auction commission decided to recognize only one procurement participant who submitted an application for participation in such an auction as its participant.

The indicated grounds, despite the fact that the auction was declared invalid, do not entail the need for the customer to perform certain actions aimed at conducting repeated auction procedures, other purchases, the contract in this case is concluded with a single participant whose application meets the requirements of the documentation.

01
Distinguishing failed trades from invalid ones

In accordance with Article 449 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, auctions held in violation of the rules established by law may be declared invalid by the court at the claim of the person concerned. Recognition of the auction as invalid entails the invalidity of the contract concluded with the person who won the auction. Thus, invalid auctions are auctions held in violation of the rules and procedures established by law (for example, violation of competition law). In turn, as follows from the situations described above, recognition of the auction as invalid means that the auction was held legally, however, according to their results, the customer did not achieve the goal of holding an auction and concluding an agreement with the winner of the auction based on their results.

02
Consequences of declaring a procurement void

Recognition of the procedure as failed should include a set of legal and factual actions that fix the legal status of such a purchase.

The legitimacy of the further procedure in a simplified manner depends on their complete and correct execution.

After recognizing a particular procurement procedure as invalid, it is advisable for the customer to perform the following sequence of actions:
1. Identify and analyze the reasons and conditions that served as the basis for recognizing the procurement as failed (for example, excessive requirements for participants, incorrect initial maximum price of the contract, insufficient deadline for submitting bids, etc.).
2. Legal assessment and decision-making on the recognition of the procurement as failed (drawing up and signing the protocol, publishing it on the website).
3. Deciding on the consequences of declaring the procurement as void (conducting a second procedure, conducting a different (simplified) procedure, concluding an agreement with a single supplier).

In contrast to the mandatory rules and norms of the legislation on the contract system, which fix the grounds and consequences of declaring the procurement as failed, Law No. 223-FZ makes it possible to provide for the consequences of declaring the procurement as failed in the form of dispositive norms.

In other words, the Regulations can provide for the possibility for the customer to choose the consequences of recognizing the procurement as failed - to conduct a new procurement, conduct another (simplified procurement) or conclude an agreement with a single supplier on the terms of a failed auction. To do this, the Regulations must provide for the possibility of choosing the consequences and use the wording not “must”, but “may”.

For example, based on the results of a failed purchase, the following decisions can be made by the customer:
- on procurement from a single supplier - in the event that conducting new procurement procedures is inappropriate (for example, time limits for conducting procurement procedures have been exhausted, conducting a new procurement, regardless of the form and method of procurement, will not lead to a change in the circle of procurement participants);
- on the conclusion of an agreement - if the submitted application and the participant who submitted it comply with the requirements of the notification, documentation;
- on the re-purchase by any of the methods, in any form, named in the Regulations, which the customer deems appropriate to use.

03 Features of concluding contracts based on the results of failed purchases

Features of concluding an agreement with a single participant based on the results of a failed purchase:
The customer is obliged to conclude an agreement with the only authorized participant in the competitive procurement, if:
a) this procurement participant was admitted by the procurement commission to participate in the procurement procedure;
b) the contract is concluded on the terms of the documentation and the draft contract;
c) the contract is concluded at the price, in the volume and on the terms specified by such a single participant in his application (and for the auction at the price agreed by the parties, not exceeding the initial (maximum) price of the contract), or on the best terms for the customer (including those reached as a result of pre-contractual negotiations)
d) no changes are made to the Procurement Plan; in the monthly report, this contract is included in the report on concluded contracts based on the results of the procurement of goods, works, services.

It is necessary to pay special attention to the fact that, based on the results of the failed bidding, the customer’s refusal to conclude an agreement with the only bidder whose application meets the documentation requirements is illegal (decision and order of the OFAS for St. Petersburg dated June 4, 2013 No. Court of the Volga-Vyatka District dated November 13, 2013 in case No. A82-15815 / 2012).

2. Features of concluding an agreement with a single supplier (as a procurement method) based on the results of a failed procurement:
The customer has the right to conclude an agreement with a single supplier based on the results of a failed procurement, provided that such an opportunity is provided for by the Procurement Regulations of such a customer, taking into account the following features:
a) the customer in the Procurement Regulations establishes the basis for concluding an agreement with a single supplier based on the results of a failed procurement;
b) adoption of an appropriate decision by authorized officials or management bodies of the customer;
c) changes are made to the procurement plan due to a change in the method of procurement;
d) an agreement with a single supplier based on the results of a failed procurement procedure is concluded taking into account the requirements established by the procurement documentation - a slight (insignificant) change in the terms of the contract is allowed (postponement of the terms associated with the procedure, change in payment terms, etc.);
e) the need to publish in the EIS a notice of purchase from a single supplier, a draft contract and a protocol for determining a single supplier.

04
Failed procedures and reporting

1. When completing the monthly report:
In the event that an agreement is concluded with a single procurement participant as a result of a failed procurement, information about such an agreement is included in the monthly report on contracts concluded as a result of the procurement of goods, works, services.

If an agreement is concluded with a single supplier as a result of a failed purchase, information about such an agreement is included in the monthly report on contracts concluded by the customer as a result of the purchase from a single supplier (executor, contractor)

2. When filling out a report in the form of federal statistical observation No. 1 - procurement "information on procurement activities
In cases where only one participant submitted an application during a tender or auction, the competitive procedure did not take place, and the customer entered into an agreement with a single supplier, one of columns 4, 5, 6 "Competitions" or 7, 8 must be filled in the report, 9 "Auctions" (depending on the announced procedure), and not column 10 "Purchasing from a single supplier".

From July 1, 2018, Federal Law No. 504-FZ of December 31, 2017 amends paragraph 4 of part 3 of article 71. See text in a future edition. 4) the contract is concluded in accordance with Clause 25 of Part 1 of Article 93 of this Federal Law in the manner established by Article 70 of this Federal Law with a participant in such an auction, an application for participation in which is filed: a) before other applications for participation in such an auction, if several participants in such an auction and the bids submitted by them are recognized as complying with the requirements of this Federal Law and documentation on such an auction; b) the only participant in such an auction, if only one participant in such an auction and the application submitted by him are recognized as complying with the requirements of this Federal Law and documentation on such an auction. ConsultantPlus: note.

Article 71. Consequences of declaring an electronic auction invalid

So, the tender is declared invalid if:

1. one application has been submitted;
2. lack of applications;
3. registered applications are submitted with violations and cannot be accepted by the commission;
4. in cases where there was no bid for the price at the set time.

Failed auction - consequences As we wrote above, depending on the reasons for the recognition of a failed auction, the customer can conclude a contract with a single supplier or conduct a new tender in the form of a request for proposals or otherwise established by law. Repeated auction Conducting a repeated auction is also carried out on the basis of Federal Law-44. At the moment, the state customer has the right to select a counterparty only by requesting proposals, but new amendments are expected soon, which will require additional.
approvals.

Article 71 44-FZ - the consequences of declaring an electronic auction invalid

Attention

Re: EA did not take place, what's next In accordance with clause 25 of part 1 of article 93 of the Federal Law of April 5, 2013 N 44-FZ "On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services to meet state and municipal needs" (hereinafter - Law on the contract system) as amended by the Federal Law of December 31, 2014 N 498-FZ, the purchase from a single supplier (contractor, performer) can be carried out by the customer, including if the electronic auction is declared invalid in accordance with parts 1 - 3.1 of the article 71 of the Law on the contract system.

At the same time, it is not required to coordinate the conclusion of a contract with a single supplier (contractor, performer) with the control body in the field of procurement.

What to do if the auction does not take place

Important

The only application - the order of actions Laws on electronic trading FZ-44 and FZ-223 are constantly supplemented and coordinated with other regulations. In 2014, additional amendments were made to No. 498-FZ and Art. 25 No. 44-FZ, within the framework of which the issue of the conditions of the failed auction is considered in more detail. The grounds are determined by Art. 71, parts 1-3.1 No. 44-FZ.

Provided that the only application for participation in the auction was under consideration in the work of the site, it is she who is considered the winner. The key feature of the recognition of the auction as invalid for this reason is the admission to participation in it of only one participant. The customer can conclude a contractual agreement with a single participant.

Consider the conditions under which you can sign a contract. This is possible only with the participant (Art. 70 FZ-44), whose application fully meets the requirements.

What to do if the purchase did not take place

If in the future a repeated tender does not take place for the same reasons (part 2 of article 55), then the customer has the right to carry out the procedure by requesting proposals in order to reduce the deadline for submitting applications to 5 working days or otherwise at the discretion of the customer. If the purchase did not take place, the only supplier concludes a contract if his application complies with the requirements of the law and documentation. In this case, the customer must obtain approval from the FAS (clause 25, part 1, article 93). This group will not include the case when, according to the results of the pre-qualification selection of a two-stage competition, only one participant is recognized as meeting the requirements (part 10 of article 57). The customer conducts the purchase again, due to the fact that it is not possible to discuss the characteristics of the order object with several suppliers.

The auction did not take place applications were submitted what to do according to federal law 44

Documents Legislation Comments Judicial practice Articles Procurement Tenders Auctions Request for quotations Request for proposals Sole supplier Contract State contract Municipal contract Federal authorities of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia Rosoboronzakaz From 01.01.2015, if an electronic auction is recognized as invalid, the approval of the conclusion of a contract with a single supplier with the control authority is not required. Federal Law No. 498-FZ dated December 31, 2014 amended paragraph 25 of Part 1 of Art. 93 44-FZ, according to which, if the electronic auction was declared invalid on the grounds that are provided for in Part. 1 - 3.1 Art.

Failed auction

General grounds For competitive procedures For electronic auction Evasion of the winner from the conclusion of the contract and subsequent evasion of the second participant from signing the contract. 1. All offers rejected. 2. Only one is recognized as compliant. When conducting a pre-qualification selection in a competition with limited participation: 1.

No participant is called to meet additional requirements.2. Only one participant was admitted based on the results of pre-qualification. When conducting an electronic auction, if there are no price offers at the auction within 10 minutes after the start of the auction.
During the second stage of the two-stage competition: 1. There are no offers.2. Only 1 proposal submitted or all participants rejected.3. Only one application was found eligible.

Info

Coordination in accordance with clause 25 of part 1 of article 93 of the Law on the contract system arises only in the event that an open tender, a tender with limited participation, a two-stage tender, a repeated tender, a request for proposals are declared invalid. Clarifications on this issue are given in the Letter of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia No. 658-EE/D28i, FAS Russia No. АЦ/1587/15 dated 01/20/2015. The data in the table without changes from 01.01.2015 (now the agreement is not required) No. p / p Reason for declaring the electronic auction invalid Actions of the Customer Approval Concluding the contract 1 No application has been submitted (part

16 art. 66 44-FZ) The customer makes changes to the schedule (procurement plan) and carries out the purchase by conducting a request for proposals in accordance with paragraph 8 of part 2 of Art. 83 44-FZ or otherwise in accordance with 44-FZ (part 4 of Art.

Auction failed one bid submitted what to do 44 ap

Federal Law and contained on the date and time of the deadline for filing applications for participation in such an auction in the register of participants in such an auction who have received accreditation on an electronic site; 2) the operator of the electronic site, within the time period specified in paragraph 1 of this part, is obliged to send a notification to the participant in such an auction that has submitted a single application for participation in such an auction; 3) the auction commission, within three working days from the date of receipt of a single application for participation in such an auction and the documents specified in paragraph 1 of this part, considers this application and these documents for compliance with the requirements of this Federal Law and documentation on such an auction and sends to the operator electronic platform protocol for consideration of a single application for participation in such an auction, signed by members of the auction commission.

If the auction did not take place, no application for 44 fz has been submitted, what to do

• home
• Tender

Author: Cherdantseva Tatyana October 20, 2017 44-FZ provides not only for competitive bidding to lower prices, but also for cases when an order is declared invalid. We will analyze the grounds for declaring a public procurement as failed, the consequences, as well as the actions of the customer in such a situation. Grounds for recognizing the procurement as failed In most cases, when the phrase “purchase did not take place” is announced, the participants have the opinion that either there are no proposals for the tender, or all applications for its participation have been rejected.
However, there are many more cases where the purchase was declared invalid. Consider this for the different stages of the procedure. All bases are collected in the table. Submission of applications Consideration Conclusion of the contract 1. There are no proposals.
2. Only one application has been submitted.
Federal Law) 2 Only one application has been submitted - the participant does not comply (part 16 of article 66 44-FZ) = based on the results of consideration of the first parts of applications by the auction commission, a decision was made to refuse admission to participation of all procurement participants (part 8 of article 67 44 -FZ) The customer makes changes to the schedule (procurement plan) and carries out the purchase by conducting a request for proposals in accordance with paragraph 8 of part 2 of Art. 83 44-FZ or otherwise in accordance with 44-FZ (part 4 of article 71 44-FZ) 3 Only one application has been submitted - the participant complies (part 16 of article 66 44-FZ) Coordination of the Customer's decision with the body authorized to exercise control in the field of procurement (FAS, Rosoboronzakaz) (clause 25, part 1, article 93 44-FZ) Conclusion of a contract with a single supplier (clause 4, part 1, article 71, clause 25, part 1, art.
Contact E-mail: This site was created to help Customers working in different institutions, but who are united by one thing - No. 44-FZ and No. 223-FZ ... After all, since the entry into force of Federal Law No. 44-FZ of 04/05/2013 "On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services to meet state and municipal needs" most people working in the field of procurement have a large number of questions that they would like to receive an answer to. help-tend.ru presents them with this opportunity. All your questions can be easily asked, or you can already find the answer on our website.

Failed, invalid and canceled purchases are different things.

Status failed purchase means that there was no competitive competition, bidding between suppliers. But as a result of such a purchase, the customer can conclude a contract with a single supplier.

Invalid auctions are recognized, during which the customer violated the laws (44-FZ, 223-FZ) or the norms of the Civil Code. If the auction is declared invalid after the winner is determined, the contract with him is terminated.

Cancel Purchase at any stage, the customer himself can, for his own reasons or by order of the regulatory authority.

For example, in 2015, every third competitive purchase was declared invalid:

In what cases will the purchase be declared invalid?

1. According to 44-FZ

Let's see how it works on the three most popular types of competitive procurement:

For the competition

• No applications have been submitted;
• All applications are rejected by the commission;
• The winner avoided signing, and the second participant refused to conclude a contract (he has the right to do so, there will be no sanctions);
• As a result of the pre-qualification, all participants did not meet the requirements;
• Only 1 application has been submitted;
• Only 1 application meets documentation requirements;
• As a result of pre-qualification, only 1 participant met the requirements.

For auction

• No applications have been submitted;
• After consideration of the first parts, all participants are denied admission;
• After consideration of the second parts, all applications do not meet the requirements;
• Only 1 application has been submitted;
• After consideration of the first parts, only 1 application meets the requirements of the documentation;
• Within ten minutes after the start of the auction, no proposals for the price of the contract were submitted;
• As a result of consideration of the second parts, only 1 application meets the requirements of the documentation;
• The winner avoided signing the contract, and the second one refused to sign the contract (he has the right to do so, there will be no sanctions).

To request a quote

• No applications have been submitted;
• All applications are rejected by the commission;
• Only 1 application has been submitted;
• Only 1 application meets the requirements.

2. According to 223-FZ

All cases when the procurement is recognized as failed must be provided for and described in the procurement regulation. The law does not regulate the actions of customers if the purchase did not take place, and in the Civil Code the concept of “failed purchase” is given only for tenders and auctions and only if one supplier participated in them.

Many customers under 223-FZ use the provisions of 44-FZ as an example, but make the conditions more flexible. Suppliers have traditionally had to rely on customer procurement regulations, the Civil Code and competition law.

What will the customer do if the procedure does not take place?

If there was not a single supplier that met the requirements

First of all, the customer makes changes to his schedule. 10 days after that, he has the right to declare:

• Repeated tender or request for proposals, if the purchase was carried out in the form of a tender;
• Request for proposals or other procedure if the auction did not take place;
• New request for proposals after the failed request for proposals.
• A new quote after a failed request for quotes.

To request quotations and electronic tenders, it is necessary to extend the deadline for submitting applications: by 4 and 10 days, respectively. If there are no offers again, the customer will make changes to the schedule and conduct a new purchase in the manner indicated above.

If there is only one participant who meets the requirements

The customer must:

1. If an electronic auction or request for quotations was held, conclude a contract with a supplier whose application meets the requirements;
2. If there was a tender or a request for proposals, coordinate the purchase from a single supplier with the regulatory authority;
3. If the purchase is agreed, conclude a contract.
4. Involve external experts in the acceptance of goods or work under a contract concluded in accordance with clauses 25.1-25.3 of part 1 of Art. 93 44-FZ. If you become the winner of such a purchase, be careful and comply with all the terms of the contract. To the little things that the customer may not pay attention to in order to quickly accept the desired product, the external commission may find fault.

What should a supplier do?

If you were the only participant in the procurement or only your procurement meets the requirements, then after its completion:

• If it was an auction, you must sign the contract on time, even if you didn't submit a bid. For example, how.
• If you participated in a tender or a request for proposals, first wait until the customer agrees on the purchase from a single supplier with the regulatory authority. The customer himself sends an application for approval to the FAS and in 10 days will notify you of the decision.
• Quotations do not require approval. The customer will conclude a contract at the price specified in your application.
• The results of the auction also do not need to be agreed upon. If none of the eligible bidders submitted a bid during the electronic auction, the contract will be awarded at the maximum price. If you are the only supplier whose 2nd part of the application met the requirements, the contract will be awarded at the price to which you have fallen.

The only supplier-winner is obliged to sign the contract on time, otherwise he will fall into the register of unscrupulous suppliers. For example, how it happened in this purchase.

In procurement under 223-FZ, the actions of the customer are determined by its procurement regulations.

findings

Customize your search so you don't miss out on purchases

Constantly look for purchases in your field. Then you will not miss anything interesting, you will have time to prepare and apply.

Sometimes the customer specifically hides the purchase so that only one supplier knows about it, which becomes the winner. We wrote about how to get around the tricks of customers. In some cases, a search through the documentation will help you find a hidden purchase.

Keep track of all purchases in which you participate

If you applied for participation, follow what happens in the procedure. For example, in Contour.Purchases, you can add a purchase to favorites. This will help you not to miss the changes in it and the results.

Don't miss the deadline for signing the contract

If you become the only supplier, you will be able to conclude a contract at the maximum price.