Introduction.

Ethics is the science of morality. It describes morality, explains morality, and "teaches" morality. And there are a number of difficulties along the way.
First, why describe morality if everyone already knows what it is? Everyone imagines themselves to be connoisseurs and judges of morals. So ethics seems to be doomed to communicate something generally known, except perhaps in a clear and systematized form.
Secondly, ethics "teaches" morality, i.e. conveys not abstract, but practical knowledge, which must be used before one truly understands it. It is knowledge that inspires action. However, no one likes teaching. The right to "read morals" is given only to people of their own impeccable life, with unconditional moral authority, such as, for example, L.N. Tolstoy. But all the preachers for thousands of years have not persuaded mankind to act according to conscience. In general, no matter how much you say "halva", it will not become sweet in your mouth; from talking about good morals do not improve. To the great sorrow of all moralists, it turns out that it is impossible to teach morality. But you can learn. A moral position can be developed independently by studying the judgments of the sages, the words and actions of people. Ethics provides every thinking person with its own methods and means of argumentation.
Thirdly, it is difficult to satisfactorily explain anything in morality. Is it possible to find out exactly the reasons for the existence of injustice, the reasons why the nobility is ridiculed, and the scoundrels triumph? As if our indignation at betrayal or rudeness would decrease if we convincingly state how and why this happens. Good deeds are even harder to explain. After all, good is usually done not for some reason, not because they explained to me what good is, but because I cannot do otherwise. There are moral evidences that are not supported by any evidence. More F.M. Dostoevsky, using the example of his Raskolnikov, showed that even a crime can be rationally substantiated, but the theorem of good cannot be proved. Therefore, one must get used to the fact that in ethics it is impossible to get such an answer as in mathematics: unambiguous, logically proven and experimentally verified. This is only for the "baby son" in the poem by V.V. Mayakovsky is so clear, "what is good and what is bad." In fact, no judgment here is final. And just as an acrobat needs to quickly move his feet in order to keep his balance on the ball, so in ethics it is necessary to move from thesis to thesis, from one point of view to another, so that the overall complex picture of morality appears in its true light.
Analyzing the theory of morality, we are faced with many problems, it is difficult to find the central one in their multitude. Starting with one, you inevitably move on to all the others. Morality, like a tangled ball, is folded from a thread of uninterrupted reasoning. The world of morality is like the Hermitage, where from each hall you can see the next, no less beautiful, and the prospect lures you further and further. but this world can also turn into a gloomy labyrinth, where in endless wanderings it is impossible to determine whether you are approaching the exit or walking in circles. The confusion is aggravated by the fact that any moral task can become the main one at the moment. Where we are, there is the center of consideration. To paraphrase Pascal, morality is an infinite sphere whose center is everywhere and whose end is nowhere. And in this essay, in addition to considering the structure, functions and antinomies of morality, I decided to consider in detail only one of its problems, which seems to me the most important and interesting - the problem of the absolute in morality.

Question 1. Morality.
This word came from France, but the concept of morality, i.e. about the rules of human behavior among other people, existed long before this word appeared. Explanation in the dictionary of V. Dahl: "rules for the will, conscience." But it can be said even more simply: morality is a generally accepted concept of what is good and what is bad. True, it is necessary to clarify: when and by whom it was recognized ... The mores of society and the concept of moral behavior, morality are formed in specific historical conditions.
Let's put it this way: our modern morality suggests that children should be treated carefully, kindly, and even more so - to children who are sick or have some kind of physical disability. It's shameful, just mean, to say "lame" to a boy who limps, or "bespectacled" to someone who has to wear glasses. This is generally recognized. Such are the mores of today's society, such are the moral norms (that is, when taking care of a sick child, a person does not commit some act of exceptional kindness, but behaves normally, naturally, as he should). But have they always been like this? No. For example, according to the law of Lycurgus, according to which ancient Sparta lived for more than one century, children were subjected to a special examination, and if a child had a physical defect that prevented him from becoming a full-fledged warrior later, he was killed by dropping into Apothetes - a deep crevice in the mountains of Taygetus.
From books and films, we know about the feat of King Leonidas and the 300 Spartans led by him, who all died, blocking the way for the Persian invaders near Thermopylae. Grateful descendants immortalized their feat in marble, inscribed on it that the soldiers died, "honestly fulfilling the law." But the same law allowed the killing of children, not considering it something shameful.
Another example.
To shoot a man is a crime, murder. But during the war years, the sniper not only shoots at the enemy, but also counts those killed by his hand. In this situation, one person (sniper), as it were, issues a sentence to another person (enemy soldier) and carries it out himself. The morality of the war allows him to act as an accuser, judge and executor of the sentence, which is completely impossible in peacetime. There are other norms of relations between people. Only a court can pass a sentence on a criminal, and any lynching, no matter how fair, is punishable.
However, morality is not only a concrete historical concept, but also a class one. From the point of view of official morality, the Russian officer Andrey Potebnya, a friend and like-minded person of Herzen, who went over to the side of the Polish rebels and fought against the tsarist punishers with weapons in his hands, committed the gravest crime - he violated the oath and betrayed the fatherland. From the point of view of the true patriots of Russia, whose voice was barely audible in 1863 and only resounded in full force decades later, Potebnya accomplished a civic feat in the name of saving the honor of Russia. Now his grave in the vicinity of Krakow is carefully guarded by the Poles - just as carefully as the graves of Soviet soldiers who died in the struggle for the liberation of Poland from the fascist yoke - and every Russian person, standing next to her, bows to the memory of this Russian patriot who fell from a bullet ... Whose bullets? The bullets of a Russian soldier who considered himself, presumably, the defender of the "Tsar, faith and fatherland" (otherwise he would not have fired at the rebels)...
Morality in words and morality in deed are not the same thing at all.
An object lesson in the misadventures of morality is taught by the history of fascism. In the book and film "Seventeen Moments of Spring" characteristics from the personal files of the SS men are remembered: a good family man, an athlete, he is even with his workmates, has no discrediting ties ...
Of course, not a single fascist said about himself: I am a scoundrel, I am an executioner, I am immoral. Forming the ideology and morality of the "Third Reich", the Nazis tried to create the illusion of imitating the cruel and harsh customs of Ancient Rome, which they saw as the "First Reich". And the camouflage worked. Throwing out their hand in a fascist salute, the Nazis copied the famous gesture of Julius Caesar; the symbolism of their banners, orders, military emblems called to resurrect the times of the Roman legions, in a businesslike manner trampling foreign lands, the revival of barbarism was shrouded in grandiloquent phrases. But the very nature and logic of the savage system caricatured the manners and morality of the Nazis, gave rise to monstrous immorality and immorality, penetrating into all pores of society.

Question 2. The role of morality in human life.
Philosophers argue that morality has three tasks: to evaluate, regulate and educate.
Morality puts estimates. All our actions, as well as all social life (economy, politics, culture), morality evaluates from the point of view of humanism, determines whether it is good or bad, good or evil. If our actions are useful to people, contribute to the improvement of their lives, their free development - this is good, this is good. Do not contribute, hinder - evil. If we want to give a moral assessment to something (our own actions, the actions of other people, some events, etc.), we, as you know, do this with the help of the concepts of good and evil. Or with the help of other close, derivative concepts: justice - injustice; honor - dishonor; nobility, decency - meanness, dishonesty, meanness, etc. At the same time, evaluating any phenomenon, action, deed, we express our moral assessment in different ways: we praise, agree or condemn, criticize, approve or disapprove, etc. d.
Evaluation, of course, affects our practical activities, otherwise we would simply not need it. When we evaluate something as good, this means that we should strive for it, and if we evaluate it as evil, we should avoid it. This means that when evaluating the world around us, we change something in it, and above all ourselves, our position, our worldview.
Morality regulates the activities of people. The second task of morality is to regulate our life, the relationship of people to each other, to direct the activities of man, society towards humane goals, towards the achievement of good. Moral regulation has its own characteristics, it differs from state regulation. Any state also regulates the life of society, the activities of its citizens. It does this with the help of various institutions, organizations (parliaments, ministries, courts, etc.), normative documents (laws, decrees, orders), officials (officials, employees, police, police, etc.).
Morality has nothing of the kind: it is ridiculous to have moral officials, it is pointless to ask who issued the order to be humane, just, kind, courageous, etc. Morality does not use the services of departments and officials. It regulates the movement of our life in two ways: through the opinion of the surrounding people, public opinion, and through the inner convictions of the individual, conscience.
The person is very sensitive to the opinions of others. No one is free from the opinion of society, the collective. A person is not indifferent to what others think of him. Consequently, public opinion can influence a person and regulate his behavior. Moreover, it is based not on the force of the order, the law, but on moral authority, moral influence.
But there should not be a conviction that public opinion, as the opinion of the majority, is always true, more true than the opinion of individuals. This is not true. It often happens that public opinion plays a reactionary role, protecting obsolete, obsolete norms, traditions and habits.
Man is not a slave to circumstances. Public opinion is, of course, a great force for moral regulation. However, it should be remembered: one person can be wrong, and the majority can be wrong. A person should not be a naive lumberjack, blindly and thoughtlessly obey someone else's opinion, the pressure of circumstances. After all, he is not a soulless cog in the state machine and not a slave to social circumstances. All people are born equal, have equal rights to life, liberty and happiness. Man is a free, active, creative being, he not only adapts to the world in which he lives, but this world itself adapts to itself, changes circumstances, creates a new social environment. Without personalities, humane and courageous, just and courageous, disinterested and independently thinking, society would simply stop developing, would rot and die.
A person, living in society, must, of course, listen to public opinion, but he must also be able to correctly evaluate it. And if it is reactionary - protest, fight against it, go against it, defending truth, justice, humanism.
Inner spiritual beliefs of the individual. Where does a person take strength when he opposes outdated public opinion, against reaction, prejudices?
Spiritual beliefs constitute the content of what we call conscience. A person is under the constant control of others, but also under the self-control of his inner beliefs. Conscience is always with a person. Every person has in life successes and failures, periods of ups and downs. You can free yourself from failures, but never from an unclean, tarnished conscience.
And a person constantly criticizes, remakes himself, as his conscience tells him. A person finds in himself the strength and courage to speak out against evil, against reactionary public opinion - this is what conscience commands. To live according to conscience requires great personal courage, and sometimes self-sacrifice. But the conscience of a person will be pure, the soul is calm, if he acted in full accordance with his inner convictions. Such a person can be called happy.
The educational role of morality. Education always goes in two ways: on the one hand, through the influence of other people on a person, through a purposeful change in the external circumstances in which the educated person is placed, and on the other hand, through the influence of a person on himself, i.e. through self-education. The upbringing and education of a person goes on virtually all his life: a person constantly replenishes, improves knowledge, skills, his inner world, because life itself is constantly updated.
Morality has its own special position in the educational process.
Question 3. The concept, the essence of the principles of morality.
The principle of morality is the principle of autonomous self-regulation by an individual of his relations to himself and to others, to the world, his behavior (internal and external).
Moral principles are one of the forms of moral consciousness in which moral requirements are expressed in the most general way. Ecли нopмa морали пpeдпиcывaeт, кaкиe кoнкpeтнo пocтyпки чeлoвeк дoлжeн coвepшaть, a пoнятиe мopaльнoгo кaчecтвa xapaктepизyeт oтдeльныe cтopoны пoвeдeния и чepты xapaктepa личнocти, тo принципы морали в oбщeй фopмe pacкpывaют coдepжaниe тoй или инoй нpaвcтвeннocти, выpaжaют выpaбoтaнныe в мopaльнoм coзнaнии oбществa тpeбoвaния, кacaющиecя нpaвcтвeннoй cyщнocти чeлoвeкa , his purpose, the meaning of his life and the nature of relationships between people.
They give a person a general direction of activity and usually serve as the basis for more particular norms of behavior. Пoмимo принципов морали, pacкpывaющиx coдepжaниe тoй или инoй нpaвcтвeннocти, нaпpимер, индивидyaлизм и aльтpyизм, кoллeктивизм и гyмaнизм, cyщecтвyют тaкжe фopмaльныe принципы, pacкpывaющиe ocoбeннocти cпocoбa выпoлнeния мopaльныx тpeбoвaний (нaпpимер, coзнaтeльнocть и ee пpoтивoпoлoжнocти - фeтишизм, фopмaлизм, дoгмaтизм, aвтopитapизм, фaнaтизм, fatalism). Xoтя эти принципы и нe oбocнoвывaют никaкиx кoнкpeтныx нopм пoвeдeния, oни тeм нe мeнee тecнo cвязaны c пpиpoдoй тoй или инoй нpaвcтвeннocти, пoкaзывaют, нacкoлькo oнa дoпycкaeт coзнaтeльнoe oтнoшeниe чeлoвeкa к пpeдъявляeмым eмy тpeбoвaниям.
Moral principles motivate human behavior, i.e. act as causes and motives that cause a person to want to do something (or, conversely, not to do something). As a result of education and self-education, people develop attitudes that force them - sometimes even as if against their will - to do things that they should do in accordance with moral standards, and not to take any actions that they should not do, since they contradict these norms. . An honest person simply cannot, say, steal something: he will not raise his hand to it. Whenever any values ​​or regulations conflict with moral ones, the choice must be made in favor of the latter. The priority of moral principles over all others extends to any human relationships and actions. In this sense, all spheres of human life and activity are subject to moral principles. Immorality is unacceptable either in everyday life or in production; neither at home nor at school; neither in sports nor in science; neither in economics nor in politics. Morality, by virtue of the priority of its principles, ensures the unity and coherence of the interaction of people in a wide variety of circumstances. Confidence that the person who happened to be nearby adheres to the same moral principles, allows you to foresee the general direction of his actions, rely on him and trust him. Even without knowing either the character of a person, or his habits, skills, abilities, you can determine in advance what should and should not be expected from him. Observance by people of uniform and universal moral principles makes their behavior predictable.
Question 4. Characteristics of the basic principles of morality.
Гуманизм (лaт. hиmaпиs - чeлoвeчный) - пpинцип миpoвoззpeния (в т. ч. и нpaвcтвeннocти) в ocнoвe котоpoгo лeжит yбeждeниe в бeзгpaничнocти вoзмoжнocтeй чeлoвeкa и eгo cпocoбнocти к coвepшeнcтвoвaнию, тpeбoвaниe cвoбoды и зaщиты дocтoинcтвa личнocти, идeя o пpaвe чeлoвeкa нa cчacтьe и o that the satisfaction of his needs and interests should be the ultimate goal of society.
The principle of humanism is based on the idea of ​​a respectful attitude to another person, fixed since ancient times. Oнa выpaжaeтcя в зoлoтoм пpaвилe нpaвcтвeннocти "пocтyпaй по oтнoшeнию к дpyгoмy тaк жe, кaк ты xoтeл бы, чтoбы пocтyпaли по oтнoшeнию к тeбe" и в кaнтoвcкoм кaтeгopичecкoм импepaтивe "пocтyпaй вceгдa тaк, чтoбы мaкcимa твoeгo пoвeдeния мoглa cтaть вceoбщим зaкoнoм".
However, the golden rule of morality contains an element of subjectivism, because what some individual person desires in relation to himself, it is not at all necessary that all others want.
Humanism, represented by its imperative side, acting as a practical normative requirement, undoubtedly, proceeds from the primacy of the individual over other values. Therefore, the content of humanism correlates with the idea of ​​personal happiness.
Genuine happiness presupposes the fullness, emotional saturation of life. It can be achieved only in the process of self-realization of the personality, one way or another carried out on the basis of goals and values ​​shared with other people.
It is possible to identify three main meanings of humanism:
1. Guarantees of basic human rights as a condition for preserving the humane foundations of his existence.
2. Support for the weak, going beyond the usual ideas of this society about justice.
3. The formation of social and moral qualities that allow individuals to carry out self-realization on the basis of public values.
К coвpeмeнным тeндeнциям paзвития гyмaниcтичecкoй мысли мoжнo oтнecти внимaниe yчeныx, oбщecтвeнныx дeятeлeй, вcex здpaвoмыcлящиx людeй к cyдьбaм paзвития чeлoвeчecтвa "Boзникнoвeниe глoбaльныx пpoблeм - peaльнaя ocнoвa для oбъeдинeния вcex нынe cyщecтвyющиx фopм peaльнoгo гyмaнизмa нeзaвиcимo oт paзличия миpoвoззpeний, пoлитичecкиx, peлигиoзныx и иныx yбeждeний".
B coвpeмeннoм миpe oгpoмный ycпex имeли идeи нeнacилия, пoзвoлившиe нa пpaктикe ocвoбoдить мнoгиe нapoды oт кoлoниaльнoй зaвиcимocти, cвepгнyть тoтaлитapныe peжимы, вoзбyдить oбщecтвeннoe мнeниe пpoтив pacпpocтpaнeния ядepнoгo opyжия, пpoдoлжeния пoдзeмныx ядepныx иcпытaний и т.д. B цeнтpe внимaния гyмaниcтичecкoй мыcли нaxoдятcя тaкжe экoлoгичecкиe пpoблeмы, глoбaльныe aльтepнaтивы, cвязaнныe c нeкoтopым cнижeниeм тeмпoв paзвития пpoизвoдcтвa, oгpaничeниeм пoтpeблeния, paзвитиeм бeзoтxoдныx пpoизвoдcтв. Пocpeдcтвoм фopмaльнoгo пpинципa нeльзя peшить кoнкpeтныe вoпpocы o гyмaннoм oтнoшeнии oднoгo чeлoвeкa к дpyгoмy, и peaльный гyмaнизм, пo-видимoмy, пpeдcтaвляeт нeкoтopый бaлaнc в coчeтaнии paзныx пpинципoв, cтeпeнь coeдинeния cвoбoды caмoвыpaжeния личнocти c тpeбoвaниями к ee пoвeдeнию, зaдaвaeмыми кyльтypoй дaннoгo oбщecтвa.
MERCY - compassionate and active love, expressed in readiness to help every needy and extending to all people, and in the limit - to all living things. В пoнятии милосердие coeдиняютcя двa acпeктa - дyxoвнo-эмoциoнaльный (пepeживaниe чyжoй бoли кaк cвoeй) и кoнкpeтнo-пpaктичecкий (пopыв к peaльнoй пoмoщи): бeз пepвoгo милосердие выpoждaeтcя в xoлoднyю филaнтpoпию, бeз втopoгo - в пycтyю ceнтимeнтaльнocть.
The origins of mercy as a moral principle lie in the apex tribal solidarity, which strictly obliges, at the cost of any sacrifices, to rescue a relative from trouble, but excluding "strangers". Пpaвдa, poдoвaя coлидapнocть мoжeт чacтичнo pacпpocтpaнятьcя и нa тex, ктo нaxoдитcя внe кpyгa "cвoиx", нo кaк-тo c ним cвязaн (oбязaннocти к гocтю, пpeдпиcaннoe в Beтxoм зaвeтe oтнoшeниe к нecвoбoдным лицaм и "пpишeльцaм" и т.п.).
Oднaкo о милосердии мoжнo гoвopить лишь тoгдa, кoгдa вce бapьepы мeждy "cвoими" и "чyжими" ecли нe в пoвceднeвнoй пpaктикe, тo в идee и в отдeльныx гepoичecкиx мopaльныx aктax пpeoдoлeны и чyжoe cтpaдaниe пepecтaeт быть лишь пpeдмeтoм xoлoднoвaтoгo cниcxoждeния.
Religions such as Buddhism and Christianity were the first to preach mercy. In Christian ethics, a caring attitude towards one's neighbor is defined as mercy, which is one of the main virtues. The essential difference between mercy and friendly love-attachment is that, according to the commandment of love, it is mediated by an absolute ideal - love for God. Christian love for one's neighbor is not limited to loved ones, it extends to all people, including enemies.
Even in cases of rejection of material inequality, loneliness, old age, ailments and other sufferings that require not only public care, but also more merciful individuality will remain. In our time, the process of the full return of the term "mercy" into the lexicon of our society is gradually taking place, and activities are being activated aimed at concrete help to merciful people.
PABEHCTBO (in morality) - a relationship between people, within which they have the same rights to develop creative abilities for happiness, respect for their personal dignity. Hapядy c пpeдcтaвлeниeм o нeoбxoдимocти бpaтcкoгo eдинcтвa мeжду людьми равенство являeтcя ключeвoй идeeй мopaли, иcтopичecки вoзникaющeй кaк aльтepнaтивa кpoвнopoдcтвeннoй зaмкнyтocти и coциaльнoй oбocoблeннocти людeй, иx фaктичecкoмy экoнoмичecкoмy и пoлитичecкoмy нepaвeнcтвy. Haибoлee aдeквaтным выpaжeниeм пpинципa равенства в мopaли являeтcя зoлoтoe пpaвилo из фopмyлиpoвки котоpoгo вытeкaeт yнивepcaльнocть (вceoбщнocть) мopaльныx тpeбoвaний, иx pacпpocтpaнeннocть нa вcex людeй, нeзaвиcимo oт иx oбщecтвeннoгo пoлoжeния и ycлoвий жизни, и yнивepcaльнocть мopaльныx cyждeний, зaключaющaяcя в тoм, чтo пpи oцeнкe пocтyпкoв дpугих people, a person proceeds from the same grounds as when evaluating his own actions.
The idea of ​​equality receives a normative expression in the principle of altruism and the corresponding requirements of compassion (pity), mercy, co-participation.
Kaк пoкaзывaeт иcтopичecкий oпыт, мopaльнoe равенство мoжeт быть пpaктичecки peaлизoвaнo тoлькo пpи oпpeдeлeннoм coциaльнo - пoлитичecкoм и кyльтypнoм cтaтyce людeй, котоpый xapaктepизyeтcя экoнoмичecкoй и пoлитичecкoй caмocтoятeльнocтью, вoзмoжнocтью пoвышeния oбpaзoвaтeль-нoгo и пpoфeccиoнaльнoгo ypoвня, дyxoвным paзвитиeм пpи нeпpeмeннoй oтвeтcтвeннocти кaждoгo члeнa oбществa зa peзyльтaты cвoeй дeятeльнocти .
ALTRUISM (from Latin altego - another) is a moral principle that prescribes compassion for other people, selfless service to them and readiness for self-denial in the name of their good and happiness. The concept of "Altruism" was introduced into the theory of morality by Kont, who made this principle the basis of his ethical system. Kont connected the moral improvement of society with the upbringing in people of a social sense of altruism, which should counteract their egoism.
As a requirement for equality and humanity, altruism is one of the normative foundations of morality and humanism. Bмecтe c тeм, бyдyчи oбpaщeнным к индивидy кaк нocитeлю чacтнoгo интepeca, альтруизм фaктичecки нeпpeмeннo пpeдпoлaгaeт caмooтpeчeниe, ибo в ycлoвияx взaимнoй oбocoблeннocти интepecoв зaбoтa oб интepece ближнeгo вoзмoжнa лишь пpи yщeмлeнии coбcтвeннoгo интepeca. Concrete forms of realization of altruism in behavior are charity and philanthropy.
Justice - the concept of moral consciousness, expressing not you or another value, good, but their general relationship between themselves and the specific distribution between individuals; the proper order of human community, corresponding to the ideas about the essence of man and his inalienable rights. Justice is also a category of legal and socio-political consciousness. In contrast to the more abstract concepts of good and evil, with the help of which a moral assessment is given to certain phenomena in general, justice characterizes the relationship of several phenomena with the point of abuse of people.
Justice does not contradict mercy, kindness, or love. Love includes both of these concepts. A just judge is obliged to punish the criminal, however, moved by love and according to the circumstances, he can at the same time show mercy in order to mitigate the punishment, which must always be humane. For example, the judge should not bully the accused, deprive him of a lawyer, or make a wrong trial.
According to Aristotle, the main thing of the prudent (prudent) is to make the right decisions regarding the good and benefit for himself as a whole - for a good life. With the help of prudence, a person is able to choose the right means for this purpose in a particular situation and implement it in an act. Aristotle emphasizes that being prudent means not just knowing, but being able to act in accordance with knowledge. If scientific and philosophical knowledge deals with extremely general definitions that do not allow substantiation, then prudence implies knowledge not only of the general, but even more of the particular, since it deals with making decisions and performing actions in specific (private) circumstances. And the prudent, as capable of making decisions, is able to achieve the highest of the benefits that can be realized in a particular act. If wisdom is acquired through the mind, then prudence is acquired through experience and a special feeling similar to conviction.
Subsequently, I. Kant separated prudence from morality. He showed that the moral law is not determined by any external goal in relation to it. Prudence is aimed at the natural goal - happiness, and a prudent act is only a means to it.
The rehabilitation of prudence in modern moral philosophy involves the restoration of its meaning as practical wisdom, that is, as the ability to act in specific circumstances in the best way. In the best way - means focusing, if not on a morally exalted, then at least - on a morally justified goal.
Prudence is determined by one of the key (along with justice and benevolence) principles of morality. This principle is formulated in the form of a requirement to take care of all parts of your life equally and not to prefer the present good to the greater good that can only be achieved in the future.
MИPOЛЮБИE - пpинцип мopaли и пoлитики, ocнoвывaющийcя нa пpизнaнии чeлoвeчecкoй жизни выcшeй coциaльно нpaвcтвeннoй цeннocтью и yтвepждaющий пoддepжaниe и yкpeплeниe миpa кaк идeaл oтнoшeний мeждy нapoдaми и гocyдapcтвaми. Peacefulness presupposes respect for the personal and national dignity of individual citizens and entire peoples, the state sovereignty, human rights and the people in the choice of their own life.
Peacefulness contributes to the maintenance of public order, mutual understanding of generations, the development of historical, cultural traditions, the interaction of various social groups, ethnic groups, nations, cultures. Peacefulness is opposed by aggressiveness, belligerence, a tendency to violent means of resolving conflicts, suspicion and distrust in relations between people, nations, socio-political. In the history of morality, peacefulness and aggressiveness, enmity oppose as two main trends.

Conclusion
Nothing can happen outside of morality, i.e. outside the circle of values ​​that determine human life. Each individual, each group, each society is a certain system of norms, ideals, prohibitions that allow the individual to gradually improve in the chosen direction. Morality is thus an indispensable dimension of human existence. The ultimate goal of morality is human happiness, the most harmonious development of the individual and all people.
One of the necessary signs of true morality is eternity, the immutability of its principles and categories, including the categories of good and evil, which are the most general and fundamental concepts of ethics.
Material things, especially those created by man, are subject to change. Moreover, they must change and improve. Human genius is constantly inventing better things. This is part of the progress that man naturally seeks in his creativity.
But moral principles and values ​​belong to a different order. Some of them are relative, while others are absolute and immutable. They are immutable because, among many other things, they prevent us from doing things that are against our dignity.

Literature
1. Guseinov A.A., Apresyan R.G. Ethics. M.: 1998. - 472 p.
2. Zelenkova I.L., Belyaeva E.V. Ethics: Textbook. - Minsk: ed.V.M. Skakun, 1995. - 320 p.
3. Milner-Irinin A.Ya. Ethics or principles of true humanity. M., Interbuk, 1999. - 519 p.
4. Mitashkina T.V., Brazhnikova Z.V. Ethics. History and theory of morality. Minsk, BSPA "VUZ-UNITI", 1996. - 345 p.
etc.................

Any science has a certain range of problems, the most complex theoretical and practical questions to which it must seek answers. The main ethical issues are:

• - the problem of criteria of good and evil;
• - the problem of the meaning of life and the purpose of man;
• - the problem of justice;
• - the problem of due.

Basic moral categories

It is possible to single out a number of moral categories that most fully reflect the essence and content of ethics. Among them: moral principles, moral norms, moral behavior, moral consciousness of a person, moral ideal, good and evil.

Moral principles

Moral principles are the basic moral laws, which are a system of values ​​that consolidates, through moral experience, the moral duties of a person. They are also called virtues. Moral principles are formed in the process of education and together become the basis for the development of a number of moral qualities of a person (humanity, a sense of justice, reasonableness, etc.).

The ways and means of implementing each moral principle are diverse and depend on the individual characteristics of the person himself, the moral traditions that have developed in society, and on the specific life situation. The most comprehensive and widespread principles include the principles of humanity, respect, reasonableness, courage and honor.

Humanity - it is a complex of positive qualities that represent a conscious, kind and disinterested attitude towards people around, all living beings and nature in general. A man differs from an animal in that he has such qualities as reason, conscience, spirituality. Being an intellectual and spiritual being, in any, even the most difficult, situations, he must remain a man in accordance with the high moral stage of his development.

Humanity is made up of everyday actions that reflect a person's good attitude towards other people and are manifested in such positive acts as mutual assistance, revenue, service, concession, favor. Humanity is a volitional action of a person based on a deep understanding and acceptance of his inherent moral qualities.

Reverence - this is a respectful attitude not only to relatives and friends, but also to the entire surrounding world, the ability to treat familiar and unfamiliar people, things and natural objects and phenomena with gratitude and attention. Reverence is associated with such qualities as politeness, tact, courtesy, goodwill, sympathy.

Intelligence - it is an action based on moral experience. It includes such concepts as wisdom and logic. On the one hand, rationality is a quality of a person’s personality, depending on the mind given to him from birth, and on the other hand, ego actions that are consistent with experience and a system of moral values.

Courage and honour - categories, meaning a person's ability to overcome difficult life circumstances and a state of fear without losing self-esteem and respect for other people. They are closely interrelated and based on personality traits such as a sense of duty, responsibility, and resilience.

Moral principles must be constantly implemented in human behavior in order to consolidate moral experience.

Moral standards

The joint residence of individuals in society requires a certain restriction of their freedom, since some human actions can be harmful and even dangerous for society. Moral norms reflect the principles and rules of relationships between people established by society that arise in the process of living together. Relationships of joint activity and mutual assistance between people are built on the basis of moral norms.

Moral norms are a social phenomenon, since they affect the problem of an individual's behavior in society, representing the requirements that society imposes on each individual person. It is society that determines how relationships between its members should be built. Society also evaluates human behavior. Quite often, these assessments do not coincide with individual ones: what is positive for an individual can cause a negative assessment of society, and vice versa, society often forces a person to do something that contradicts his aspirations and desires.

The fact that moral norms are of a social nature has developed historically. After all, the moral consciousness of a person is formed under the influence of his environment, on the basis of moral ideals and moral authorities developed by society. The moral norms of an individual are a symbiosis of social attitudes and personal consciousness.

Moral norms are the basis for assessing human behavior by society. There are no single criteria for such an assessment, they depend on the era, the type of society, on the traditional moral attitudes that have developed in any territory, in a particular country, etc. The same actions of people at different times, in different societies can be considered moral and immoral. For example, the barbaric traditions of scalping among the North Indians or eating the heart of a defeated enemy among the natives of Oceania did not seem immoral in their time, but were considered a manifestation of special valor deserving public respect.

The norms of morality in society exist in the form of prohibitions and unspoken instructions. Prohibitions are those norms of individual behavior that are undesirable for society as a whole. Unspoken, informal prescriptions give a person the freedom to choose the type of behavior within the framework of generally accepted norms. Historically, prohibitions have always preceded prescriptions.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Similar Documents

The teachings of Hippocrates - the founder of ancient scientific medicine, the reformer of the medical school of Antiquity. A collection of medical treatises known as the Hippocratic Corpus. Hippocratic oath, principles of non-maleficence, preservation of medical secrecy.

presentation, added 12/10/2015


Moral values ​​of Christianity in the professional ethics of doctors. Formation of monastic medicine. Activities of the Institute of Compassionate Widows, Holy Cross Community of Sisters of Mercy. The development of medicine in the Soviet era. Doctor's oath and oath.

presentation, added 09/23/2013


Moral and ethical problems of medicine. Determination of the quality of medical care and its main constituent elements. The essence and significance of medical ethics. Features and principles of the relationship between the doctor and the patient, the physician and the patient. Medical secrecy and euthanasia.

presentation, added 11/18/2014


Hippocrates as a great reformer of ancient medicine and a materialist. The idea of ​​a high moral character and a model of ethical behavior of a doctor. The rules of medical ethics formulated in the "Hippocratic Oath" and their value for the younger generation of doctors.

presentation, added 05/13/2015


The concept and principles of ethics, features of its manifestation in the medical field. Determination of the quality of medical care and its constituent elements. Fundamentals of counseling and interpersonal communication. The essence and significance of medical secrecy, its necessity.

presentation, added 04/01/2014


Principles of medical ethics relating to the role of health professionals, especially physicians, in protecting prisoners or detainees from ill-treatment. Medicine in emergency situations. Medical ethical issue in student education.

presentation, added 03/29/2015


Organizational principles and modern theories of medicine and public health. Social and biological factors of health. The concept of a healthy lifestyle. The essence and methods of studying health. Organizational and legal bases of medical activity.

abstract, added 01/27/2011


presentation, added 11/11/2016

Morality- one of the types of social regulators, a set of special, spiritual rules that regulate human behavior, his attitude to other people, to himself, and also to the environment. The content of morality is a set of principles and norms that are able to have a special, spiritual impact on people's actions, serve as a model, an ideal of humane behavior. These include, for example, the principle of humanism (humanity, justice, mercy) or such norms as “do not kill”, “do not steal”, “do not bear false witness”, “keep this promise”, “do not lie”, etc. .

Moral principles- the main element in the system of morality is the basic fundamental ideas about the proper behavior of a person, through which the essence of morality is revealed, on which other elements of the system are based. The most important of them are: humanism, collectivism, individualism, altruism, selfishness, tolerance.

moral standards- specific rules of conduct that determine how a person should behave in relation to society, other people, himself. The imperative-evaluative nature of morality is clearly traced in them.

Moral norms as varieties of social norms, depending on the method of assessment, are divided into two types:

1) requirements - prohibitions (do not lie, do not be lazy; do not be afraid, etc.);

2) requirements - patterns (be brave, strong, responsible, etc.).

7. Functions of morality

1. Regulatory function. Regulates the behavior of people in accordance with the requirements of morality. It implements its regulatory capabilities with the help of norms-guidelines, norms-requirements, norms-prohibitions, norms-frames, restrictions, as well as norms-samples (etiquette).

2. Value Orienting Function. Orients a person in the world of surrounding cultural values. It develops a system of preference for some moral values ​​over others, allows you to identify the most moral assessments and lines of behavior.

3. Cognitive (epistemological) function. It assumes the cognition not of objective characteristics, but of the meaning of phenomena as a result of practical development.

4. educational function. Brings into a certain educational system moral norms, habits, customs, mores, generally recognized patterns of behavior.

5. Evaluation function. Evaluates human development of reality from the standpoint of good and evil. The subject of assessment is actions, attitudes, intentions, motives, moral views and personal qualities.

6. Motivational function. Allows a person to evaluate and, if possible, justify their behavior with the help of moral motivation.

7. Communicative function. It acts as a form of communication, transmission of information about the values ​​of life, moral contacts between people. Provides mutual understanding, communication of people based on the development of common moral values.

Morality Properties

Morality contains antinomic properties, which mean the following:

1. The antinomy of the objective and the subjective.

o a) Moral requirements have an objective meaning regardless of subjective tastes.

o b) Moral requirements reflect a subjective position, necessarily someone's position.

o c) The impersonality of the moral demand. The demand does not come from anyone. The moral law appears as an abstract requirement.

2. Antinomy of the universal and the particular.

o a) On the one hand, morality acts as a specific moral system.

o b) On the other hand, the moral position is formulated in a universal form. The moral law is inherent in universality and uniqueness.

3. Antinomy of practical expediency and moral value.

o a) Morality has a practical meaning (benefit).

o b) Morality does not always contain benefits. Virtue is often punishable.

o c) The disinterestedness of the moral motive. Moral utility is not pragmatic. Morality speaks of what is due.

4. Antinomy of public and private.

o a) Obedience to average social norms.

o b) An individual with highly developed moral ideals is in disagreement with society. From the standpoint of morality, it does not act as a representative of the social environment, as a bearer of universal human values.

5. Antinomy of causality and freedom.

o a) Moral behavior has its reasons.

o b) A moral person is ready to go against logic, habit (autonomously, freely). The real cause of individual actions is freedom.

The structure of morality

1. moral consciousness- one of the forms of social consciousness, which, like its other forms, is a reflection of the social life of people. Moral consciousness includes values, norms, ideals. Here morality manifests itself as a striving for perfection. Moral consciousness functions at two levels of regulation in relations between people: emotional-sensual(ordinary consciousness) and rational-theoretical(ethics). Emotional level - a person's mental reaction to an event, attitude, phenomenon. It includes emotions, feelings, mood. Emotional-sensory moral consciousness determines the relationship of a person:

a) to other people (feelings of sympathy or antipathy, trust or distrust, jealousy, hatred, etc.);

b) to oneself (modesty, dignity, vanity, pride, exactingness, etc.);

c) to society as a whole (sense of public duty, patriotism).

2. moral behavior, based on the moral consciousness of the individual, realizing its moral relations, are the result of the formation of the individual and his free choice. Moral practice- includes real morals, actions, moral relations. Deeds and actions reflect the moral side of human activity. They have a positive or negative orientation and involve moral responsibility.

3. Moral Relations- the central element of the structure of morality, which fixes the properties of any human activity in terms of its moral assessment.

1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………..2
2. The concept of morality………………………………………………………….. 3
3. The structure of morality………………………………………………………... 4
4. Moral principles………………………………………………………6
5. Moral standards………………………………………………………..7
6. Moral ideal………………………………………………………...9
7. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………11
8. References……………………………………………………… ...12

1. Introduction

Moral principles, norms and ideals arose from people's ideas about justice, humanity, goodness, public good, etc. The behavior of people that corresponded to these ideas was declared moral, the opposite - immoral.

To reveal the topic of the test, it is important to define morality, to consider its structure.

The correct definition of the general basis of morality does not yet mean an unambiguous derivation from it of specific moral norms and principles. Moral activity includes not only the implementation, but also the creation of new norms and principles, finding the most appropriate ideals and ways to implement them..

The purpose of this work is to consider moral principles, norms, ideals.

Main tasks:

1. Define the essence of morality.

2. Consider moral principles and their role in guiding the moral behavior of a person.

3. Consider moral standards in people's communication.

4. Give the concept of a moral ideal.

2. The concept of morality.

The very word (term) "morality" goes back to the Latin word "mores", meaning "temper". Another meaning of this word is law, rule, ordinance. In modern philosophical literature, morality is understood as morality, a special form of social consciousness and a type of social relations.

Morality is one of the main ways to regulate human actions in society with the help of norms. It is a system of principles and norms that determine the nature of relations between people in accordance with the concepts of good and evil, fair and unfair, worthy and unworthy accepted in a given society. Compliance with the requirements of morality is ensured by the power of spiritual influence, public opinion, inner conviction, and human conscience.

Morality arises and develops on the basis of the need of society to regulate the behavior of people in various areas of their lives. Morality is considered one of the most accessible ways for people to comprehend the complex processes of social life. The fundamental problem of morality is the regulation of relationships and interests of the individual and society. A feature of morality is that it regulates the behavior and consciousness of people in all spheres of life (production activity, everyday life, family, interpersonal and other relationships). Its prescriptions are universal, universal in nature and applicable in a variety of life situations. Almost everywhere where people live and work. Morality also extends to intergroup and interstate relations.

The scope of morality is wide, but, nevertheless, the richness of human relations can be reduced to relations:

• individual and society;
• individual and collective;
• team and society;
• team and team;
• man and man;
• person to himself.

Thus, in resolving issues of morality, not only collective, but also individual consciousness is competent: the moral authority of someone depends on how correctly he realizes the general moral principles and ideals of society and the historical necessity reflected in them. The objectivity of the foundation just allows the individual to independently, to the extent of his own consciousness, perceive and implement social requirements, make decisions, develop rules of life for himself and evaluate what is happening.

3. The structure of morality.

The structure of morality is multi-tiered and multifaceted, it is impossible to cover it at the same time.The very way morality is illuminated determines its visible structure. Different approaches reveal different aspects of it:

1. biological - studies the prerequisites of morality at the level of an individual organism and at the level of a population;
2. psychological - considers the psychological mechanisms that ensure the implementation of moral standards;
3. sociological - clarifies the social conditions in which mores are formed, and the role of morality in maintaining the stability of society;
4. normative - formulates morality as a system of duties, prescriptions, ideals;
5. personal - sees the same ideal ideas in personal refraction, as a fact of individual consciousness;
6. philosophical - represents morality as a special world, the world of the meaning of life and the purpose of man.

These six aspects can be represented by the colors of the faces of the Rubik's Cube. Such a cube, which is fundamentally impossible to collect, i.e. to achieve one-color faces, one-plane vision. Considering the morality of one side, you have to consider others. So this structuring is very conditional.

In order to reveal the nature of morality, one must try to find out how, in what ways it reconciles personal and social interests, what it relies on, what in general encourages a person to be moral.

Morality relies primarily on conviction, on the power of consciousness, social and individual. It can be said that morality rests, as it were, on three "pillars".

Firstly, these are the traditions, customs, mores that have developed in a given society, among a given class, social group. The emerging personality assimilates these mores, traditional forms of behavior that become a habit, become the property of the spiritual world of the individual.

Secondly, morality is based on the power of public opinion, which, by approving some actions and condemning others, regulates the behavior of the individual, teaches him to observe moral standards. The instruments of public opinion are, on the one hand, honor, good name, public recognition, which are the result of a conscientious fulfillment by a person of his duties, his steady observance of the moral norms of a given society; on the other hand, shame, shame of a person who has violated moral norms.

Finally, thirdly, morality is based on the consciousness of each individual, on the understanding of the need to harmonize personal and public interests. This determines a voluntary choice, voluntary behavior, which takes place when conscience becomes a solid basis for the moral behavior of a person.

A moral person differs from an immoral one, from one who has "no shame, no conscience," not only and not even so much because his behavior is much easier to regulate, to subordinate to existing rules and norms. The personality itself is impossible without morality, without this self-determination of one's behavior. Morality turns from a means into an end, into an end in itself of spiritual development, into one of the most necessary conditions for the formation and self-affirmation of the human personality.

In the structure of morality, it is customary to distinguish between forming elements. Morality includes moral principles, moral norms, moral ideals, moral criteria, etc.

4. Moral principles.

Principles are the most general justification for existing norms and the criterion for choosing rules. Principles express universal formulas of behavior. The principles of justice, equality, sympathy, mutual understanding and others are the conditions for a normal community of all people.

Moral principles are one of the forms of expressing moral requirements, in the most general form revealing the content of morality that exists in a particular society. They express the fundamental requirements regarding the moral essence of a person, the nature of relationships between people, determine the general direction of human activity and underlie private, specific norms of behavior. In this regard, they serve as criteria of morality..

Moral principles include the following general principles of morality:

1. humanism - the recognition of man as the highest value;
2. altruism - selfless service to one's neighbor;
3. mercy - compassionate and active love, expressed in readiness to help everyone in need of something;
4. collectivism - a conscious desire to promote the common good;
5. rejection of individualism - the opposition of the individual to society, any sociality.

In addition to the principles that characterize the essence of a particular morality, there are so-called formal principles, which already relate to the ways of fulfilling moral requirements. Such, for example, are consciousness and its opposite formalism, fetishism, fanaticism, and dogmatism. Principles of this kind do not determine the content of specific norms of behavior, but also characterize a certain morality, showing how consciously moral requirements are met.

Moral principles are of universal importance, they cover all people, they fix the foundations of the culture of their relationships, created in the long process of the historical development of society.

By choosing principles, we choose a moral orientation in general. This is a fundamental choice, on which particular rules, norms and qualities depend. Loyalty to the chosen moral system (principality) has long been considered the dignity of the individual. It meant that in any life situation a person will not deviate from the moral path. However, the principle is abstract; once the intended line of conduct, sometimes begins to assert itself as the only correct one. Therefore, one must constantly check one's principles for humanity, compare them with ideals.

5. Moral norms.

Moral norms are social norms that regulate a person's behavior in society, his attitude towards other people, towards society and towards himself. Their implementation is ensured by the power of public opinion, internal conviction on the basis of the ideas accepted in a given society about good and evil, justice and injustice, virtue and vice, due and condemned.

Moral norms determine the content of behavior, how it is customary to act in a certain situation, that is, the morals inherent in a given society, social group. They differ from other norms that operate in society and perform regulatory functions (economic, political, legal, aesthetic) in the way they regulate people's actions. Moral norms are brought up every day by the force of tradition, the force of habit, the assessments of loved ones. Already a small child, by the reaction of adult family members, determines the boundaries of what is "possible" and what is "impossible". A huge role in the formation of moral norms characteristic of a given society is played by the approval and condemnation expressed by others.

Unlike simple customs and habits, when people act in the same way in similar situations (birthday celebrations, weddings, seeing off to the army, various rituals, the habit of certain labor actions, etc.), moral norms are not simply fulfilled due to the established generally accepted order, but find an ideological justification in a person's ideas about proper or improper behavior, both in general and in a specific life situation. 5. Moral standards………………………………………………………..7
6. Moral ideal………………………………………………………...9
7. Conclusion………………………………………………………………… 11
8. References……………………………………………………...12