The story of A. S. Pushkin "Dubrovsky" is based on a historical plot about the rebellion of the peasants of the Pskov landowner Dubrovsky. The author created a work that very realistically merged into his modernity. But the initially conceived image of the protagonist turned out to be contradictory: Vladimir Dubrovsky from the novel "Dubrovsky" is a noble robber, whose image does not at all fit with the mores of serf Russia.
The characterization of Dubrovsky from the novel "Dubrovsky", which the author introduces us at the beginning of the work, suggests that in the future he will turn into an egoist and a reveler, stupidly living life. Vladimir is no different from other young people: he lives on his father's means and does not care at all about where they come from. He is young and can afford a luxurious life, playing cards, debts and entertainment. He is not interested in the future, because, like his friends, he dreams of a rich bride, marriage to which will solve all problems.
But very quickly you can understand that all this recklessness, careless behavior is explained only by his youth. Learning that his father was very ill, he dropped everything and went to him without a moment's hesitation. Thus, the personality of Dubrovsky is revealed from a completely different side.
The coachman who met him spoke about the events taking place in the house of Dubrovsky Sr., about the lawsuit that the neighbor started. But all this is of little interest to the young man. For him, the state of his father is much more important. Approaching his native estate, he experiences tender and kind feelings. His heart is full of memories, and the nanny who met him evoked tenderness and pity in Vladimir. In his arms, he put all the undisguised love and care for his loved ones.
First meeting with Vladimir
The life of Dubrovsky Jr. changed a lot after the death of his father. He did not become like other landowners in the district and did not bow before the petty tyrant Troyekurov. It was more important for him to preserve the honor of an officer, and the young man began to look for ways to take revenge. Thoughts of revenge made him a robber, a noble robber. After all, how else can one explain such actions as robbing only the rich, distributing money to the needy.
The image of Vladimir Dubrovsky is a kind of authorial protest against injustice. Of course, it is very difficult to call a robber honest and noble. The concept of honor is incompatible with such matters. But this is exactly how A. S. Pushkin is trying to convey to people that the culprit in such a situation is not one person, but the entire political system of the country. The young son of Dubrovsky does not know how to protest, and therefore takes the path of robbery. As a result, he understands the groundlessness of his actions, but he is no longer able to change the situation. He only asks his accomplices to surrender and change their lifestyle.
The image of Vladimir Dubrovsky
Such qualities of Dubrovsky as intelligence, education, speak volumes. He teaches his son Kirila Petrovich grammar and geography, teaches Masha music and singing. If he were stupid, it would not have been possible to reincarnate as a teacher.
His courage was envied by many. One of his deeds, the killing of a bear belonging to the master, commands respect. He was not afraid, but drew attention to himself, which forced himself to be respected.
Such character traits of Dubrovsky as sincerity, tenderness and nobility are revealed in scenes with Masha Troekurova. His love is stronger than vengeance, because of it he refuses to harm his enemy. With his decision, Vladimir leads the reader to the idea that sounds in the biblical commandment: do not answer evil with evil.
The story of Vladimir Dubrovsky is instructive. The author is trying to show that the lawlessness of the landowners cannot go unpunished. Where nobility and justice meet on the path of untruth and dishonor, the landowners receive a worthy rebuff. Vladimir became a robber by coincidence, and the death of Dubrovsky Sr. only strengthened them. However, the path he chose did not bring satisfaction and Dubrovsky disappears from the life of his peasants.
The peasants not only follow him, they believe him. And to achieve this from the common people is very difficult. According to the description, Dubrovsky is noble and kind, he cannot give up his peasants for reprisal, therefore he invites them to surrender and start living right.
Artwork test
noble deeds of vladimer dubrovsky and got the best answer
Answer from
The main protagonist of the novel - the figure of the "noble robber" Vladimir Dubrovsky - is somewhat romanticized by Pushkin.
All Vladimir's actions are noble, honest and fair.
Dubrovsky robs only well-known rich people and never takes all the money.
His robbers never killed anyone, although atrocities were committed in the district, which were attributed to his gang and allegedly committed on his behalf.
There was discipline in Vladimir's gang, his orders were carried out implicitly.
The robbers did not touch the estate of Troekurov, who attributed this to his own significance, although the fact was that Vladimir did not like simple vile revenge, he was not so petty as to indulge in it.
When Arkhip decided to kill the bailiffs, considering them the cause of misfortune (the story of the eviction of the Dubrovskys from his own estate), Vladimir stopped him and did not allow him to do this.
Vladimir decided that no one would get this house, since he was expelled from here. He called all the servants from the house, leaving only the clerks there, and ordered the house to be set on fire. Vladimir just wanted to scare them a little, and at the last moment he sent Arkhip to open the doors in the house, but he locked them with a key. The death of clerks is not his fault. Vladimir's servants correspond to their master. Arkhip was cruel to the clerks for having taken everything away from them, but with danger to his life he saves a helpless cat from the fire.
Vladimir belatedly tried to save Masha from her hated marriage, but when he told Masha that she was free, Masha asked not to touch her husband, because she had already been married to him. And, although Dubrovsky himself was wounded by Vereisky, he orders his people not to touch Masha and her husband.
When the camp is surrounded by soldiers, Vladimir realizes that they are doomed, but he does not force them to fight and shed unnecessary blood. He gathers his people and invites them to disperse and start a new life.
Vladimir performs all his noble deeds out of a sense of love and justice, punishing rich and cruel people, trying to teach them a lesson, and always helps those people whom he sympathizes with and who deserve it.
Answer from 3 answers[guru]
Hello! Here is a selection of topics with answers to your question: noble deeds of vladimer dubrovsky
A. S. Pushkin wrote the story "Dubrovsky". In it, the main character is Vladimir Dubrovsky.
Vladimir Dubrovsky is one of the most courageous, courageous and noble heroes in the work of A. S. Pushkin, the central character of the robber novel "Dubrovsky". Vladimir is the only son of Andrei Gavrilovich, a hereditary nobleman, a young, educated cornet and a graduate of the Cadet Corps. He was 23 years old when he learned that his father had been illegally deprived of the family estate. After suffering litigation, Vladimir's father fell into a serious condition, and then died altogether. All the peasants who worked for the Dubrovskys refused to serve the new master Troekurov and remained to serve Vladimir. Then, deciding to avenge his father, he organized a gang of robbers that kept all the surrounding landowners at bay. However, this group of bandits behaved rather strangely. They did not kill anyone, they never robbed the needy, but only the very rich and deserving people.
In achieving his main goal, revenge on Troekurov for his father, he was persistent and unshakable. But fate prepared a test for him - love for Maria Troekurova. Pretending to be a French teacher, Vladimir managed to get into the house and entourage of his enemy. There he taught Masha music, and her brother Sasha other sciences. At the same time, he was on good terms with everyone, even with Troekurov himself, who considered him a very brave young man. After all, one day, when he decided to play a trick on the teacher and locked him in the same room with a bear, Vladimir did not lose his head and shot the beast. Soon the truth about the identity of the teacher was revealed because of a certain Spitsyn, who once testified perjury at the trial against Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky. Vladimir robbed this man to the bone, after which he turned to the local police officer. Dubrovsky Jr. was ordered to be arrested, and he was gone.
While he was away, they decided to marry Masha to a fifty-year-old prince. This news made him very sad. I wish to help the girl in every possible way, he offered her his patronage. For the sake of love, he was ready for a lot, and even abandoned his intention to take revenge on Masha's father. Unfortunately, luck is not always on the side of brave and fair people. Having learned that his daughter was secretly meeting with Dubrovsky, Troekurov ordered to lock her up and speed up the wedding. Masha was soon married to Prince Vereisky. On the way back, Dubrovsky's robbers attacked the wedding carriage, but it was too late. Masha did not run away, as she was already married. Vladimir was wounded during this sortie, and a large round-up was sent to his gang. Realizing that he and his people were in danger, the young man disbanded the whole gang, and he himself disappeared. Nobody saw him again.
Vladimir Dubrovsky is presented as a noble defender of the rights of the individual, an independent person, capable of feeling deeply. The tone in which Pushkin writes about Vladimir Dubrovsky is always full of sympathy, but never ironic. Pushkin approves of all his actions and claims that all offended people should rob, steal, or even go out onto the main road. So, my version: this is a novel about nobility. About nobility in the meaning indicated by V. I. Dal. "Nobility is a quality, this state, a noble origin; actions, behavior, concepts and feelings, decent to this title, consistent with true honor and morality." Dal directly connects the nobility with the nobility, of course, and Pushkin did not share them, so the topic is broader: the fate and purpose of the nobility or the honor of a nobleman. Surely Pushkin was very worried about this topic. "Take care of honor from a young age" - the epigraph of his next work "The Captain's Daughter", in which it is written again about this topic.
So, a novel about nobility, the hero of the novel is a nobleman, "who became a victim of injustice." There is no doubt about the nobility of the hero, but still sometimes he betrays the nobility. When does this happen for the first time? In Chapter 4 we read: "Tell Kirill Petrovich to get out as soon as possible before I order him to be driven out of the yard ... Let's go!" - The servant happily ran. The author did not condemn the ardor of the young Dubrovsky in a word. And we can fully understand his feelings - he is amazed at the state of his father: "The patient pointed to the yard with an air of horror and anger." But Dubrovsky's hasty order to drive Troekurov out of the court bears bad consequences, and the most important of them is not Troekurov's offense, but the fact that the servants were allowed to behave insolently. “The servant happily ran. There is some rampant servile insolence in this“ joyfully ”. One can understand and justify Dubrovsky, but judge for yourself, is Dubrovsky right?
Dubrovsky became a robber, a noble robber: “he attacks not everyone, but famous rich people, but even here he shares with them, and does not rob him completely, and no one accuses him of murders ... "
But Dubrovsky himself is well aware of the path he has taken. "A villainy will never be committed in your name. You must be pure even in my crimes." Pushkin nowhere gives any assessment of Dubrovsky's actions (in contrast, by the way, to Troekurov's actions; what is the only remark "Such were the noble amusements of the Russian master!"). The reader himself will guess that evil deeds and crimes are incompatible with high honor. At the first explanation with Masha, Dubrovsky said: "I realized that the house where you live is sacred, that not a single creature connected with you by blood ties is subject to my curse. I refused revenge as madness." But he did not give up revenge at all, continuing to remember other offenders.
"Sleeping in the same room with a man whom he could consider his personal enemy and one of the main culprits of his disaster, Dubrovsky could not resist the temptation. He knew about the existence of the bag and decided to take it." And our moral sense is indignant at the fact that Dubrovsky succumbed to temptation, once again betraying his nobility. And again, we can both understand and justify Dubrovsky, and the author again does not give any assessments, but we cannot agree that this act does not correspond to the concept of true honor.
Let us now turn to the heroine of the novel. Marya Kirillovna is also a victim of injustice. Forced to marry a "hated man", she is also looking for a way out. "Marriage scared her like a scaffold, like a grave." "No, no," she repeated in despair, "it's better to die, better to go to a monastery, I'd better go after Dubrovsky." But she does not cross the line beyond which pure morality ends. The priest spoke the "irrevocable words". The contemporary Pushkin reader knew these words: "Lord our God, crown them with glory and honor."
It is interesting that Pushkin ends this novel almost on the same note: "But I am given to another." This is the pinnacle of nobility. Any other act will cause many misfortunes. "I don't want to be the cause of some horror," Masha says to Dubrovsky. For such an act of strength, much more is needed than for protest and revenge. Neither Onegin nor Dubrovsky can rise to such a height.
Hence, I have an assumption that this is precisely why Pushkin parted with his hero "in a moment of evil for him." He doesn't seem to have anything else to do with him. And so he takes on another novel, and gives it a name that surprises many, "The Captain's Daughter", and in this novel the heroine is again called Masha for some reason, and the main question is about honor, nobility and loyalty. And Pyotr Grinev brilliantly resolves it.
So, this is my understanding of the novel by A. S. Pushkin "Dubrovsky" and its main character Dubrovsky.
Vladimir Dubrovsky, the hero of A. S. Pushkin's story "Dubrovsky", is a robber: he sets fire to landowners' houses, robs on the roads. All this does not do him credit, but he has some actions that I would like to justify.
Arson of the house - the house where you were born and raised! One can only imagine what feelings Dubrovsky experienced at that moment! Here we must not blame our hero, but the circumstances that forced him to make such a decision. However, I cannot fully justify this act, because people died as a result of the fire.
Dubrovsky and his gang are engaged in robberies on the roads, but the general, who visited Anna Savishna Globova, says about him: “Dubrovsky does not attack everyone, but famous rich people, but even here he shares with them, and does not rob completely; and no one accused him of the murders. The story of the postal order, which Anna Savishna told about, confirms the words of the general.
Having met a young Frenchman at the post station, Dubrovsky takes away his documents, gives money to a failed teacher and, in fact, saves him from the humiliation and insults that he would have to endure in Troekurov's house. I think that this act of Dubrovsky simply "made happy" the Frenchman.
Dubrovsky became a robber with only one goal: to take revenge on Troekurov for all the misfortunes that he brought him. But later, Dubrovsky refuses revenge: he cannot hurt Masha Trekurova, the daughter of his enemy. “I realized that the house where you live is sacred, that not a single creature connected with you by ties of blood is subject to my curse,” he says. I respect this decision of Dubrovsky: love turned out to be stronger than hate.
Dubrovsky takes a "leather bag" with money from the landowner Spitsyn. Why is he doing this? After all, after such an act, he will have to leave Troekurov's house, part with Masha. But Spitsyn is one of those who gave false testimony at the trial, who ruined Dubrovsky's life, killed hope for the future - and he must be punished. And I fully justify Dubrovsky's actions in this situation.
Pushkin's hero is noble and honest in his relationship with Masha. Before leaving the house, he reveals his real name. On the day of the wedding, Dubrovsky tries to save her, and when this fails, he lets Masha and her husband go in peace.
Many of Dubrovsky's actions are difficult to assess unequivocally: I justify some of them, others I don't. One thing I know for sure: Dubrovsky is a courageous and noble person, but life circumstances forced him to go against the laws of society. By the way, did this very society deal with him legally?
