See what "Kataev, I.M." in other dictionaries

12.03.2019

Kataev A.M. The last years of renovationism in the context of state-church relations in 1943-1945. // Arrival. Orthodox economic bulletin. - 2006. - No. 4.5.

1. From the history of the Renovationist schism in the Russian Orthodox Church in the first half of the 20th century.

The Renovationist schism of the Russian Orthodox Church was organized by the Politburo and the GPU in 1922. The Renovationist movement was created as a "Soviet" alternative to the "Black Hundred", "Tikhonov" Church. The organs of the GPU prepared the seizure of central church power by a group of renovationists, which took place in mid-May 1922. A convenient moment for introducing a schism into the church environment was the seizure of church valuables, which began in February - March 1922 under the pretext of raising funds for the starving. It was during this period that the GPU began preparations for the seizure of church power by specially selected representatives of the clergy. The role of the developer of the church schism strategy was assigned to L.D. Trotsky, who in March 1922, in his letters to the Politburo, determined the direction of work to split the Church. In the same period, repressions began against Patriarch Tikhon and prominent representatives of the clergy. Formed on May 19, 1922, immediately after the house arrest of Patriarch Tikhon, the Renovationist Higher Church Administration (HCU) was headed by a provincial Bishop Antonin (Granovsky). At this stage, the GPU was relying on its agent, the priest V. Krasnitsky, and the "Living Church" headed by him, with the help of which the Chekists tried to decompose the Church from within, implanting the clergy "with a tarnished reputation", anti-canonical reforms, etc. After the formation of the HCU, intensive work began on the creation of renewal structures in the localities. From the secretariat of the Central Committee of the RCP(b) telegrams were sent to all provincial committees of the RCP(b) in which they spoke of the need to support the renovationist structures being created. The GPU actively put pressure on the ruling bishops in order to achieve their recognition of the HCU and the Living Church. Repressions were organized against the "Tikhonovsky" clergy.

However, in the central provinces of Russia, the renovationist bodies of church administration were far from being created everywhere. In the north and northwest of Russia, the organizational formation of renovationist centers took place at an average pace. In the west of the country: in the Smolensk, Minsk, Gomel dioceses, renovationism in the summer of 1922 gained little distribution. During this period, the staff of the GPU were not able to achieve much success in organizing the Renovationist split in the Volga region. By August 1922, the renewal movement had little spread in the provinces. There were only a few cases when the HCU was recognized by the ruling diocesan bishops. As a rule, renovationist dioceses were headed by former vicars with the support of the authorities. In August 1922, the Living Church congress was held. It was decided to allow the consecration of married presbyters as bishops, the second marriage of clergy, monks in holy orders to marry without removing their rank, clergy and bishops to marry widows, and some canonical restrictions on marriage were also abolished. Many who previously recognized the HCU after coming to the leadership of this body of the Living Church members dissociated themselves from it.

Immediately after the end of the congress, the head of the 6th department of the Secret Department of the GPU-OGPU E.A. Tuchkov began to form special renovationist groups: the "Union of Church Revival" (CCV) was added to the "Living Church" group, which continued to exist, headed by Antonin (Granovsky), who had already taken the title of "Metropolitan", who dissociated himself from the "Living Church", calling it "priestly union that wants only wives, awards and money." He was supported by those who considered V. Krasnitsky too leftist and strove for moderation, and those who were against the destruction of the canonical structure of the Church. However, being a supporter of a radical liturgical reform and an implacable opponent of Patriarch Tikhon, Bishop Antonin was subsequently banned by the Patriarch from serving. In a letter to Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky), Antonin called V. Krasnitsky and his "Living Church" "the seat of the destroyers", and explained his temporary alliance with them with considerations of "state order, so as not to split the schism among the people and not open church civil strife."

For the left radicals, the "Union of Communities of the Ancient Apostolic Church" (SODATS) was created, headed by Archpriest Alexander Vvedensky. The SODAC program was frankly anti-canonical in nature and included demands for "renewal of religious morality", the introduction of a married episcopate, the closure of "degenerate" monasteries, and the embodiment of the ideas of "Christian socialism". After the creation of these groups in Moscow, their intensive planting in the regions began.

Since October 1922, the Anti-Religious Commission under the Central Committee of the RCP(b) took over the overall leadership of activities to support renovationism. On October 16, at a meeting of the VCU, it was reorganized, Antonin (Granovsky) became chairman again, who received two deputies - A. Vvedensky and V. Krasnitsky.

On April 29, 1923, the Renovationist "Local Council of the Russian Orthodox Church" was opened in Moscow, among others 22 bishops of the old order took part in it. The main decision of the council from the point of view of power was the announcement of Patriarch Tikhon "deprived of his dignity and monasticism and returned to his primitive secular position." The Supreme Church Council (SSC) was also elected. The cathedral received a sharply negative assessment of the majority of believers.

After the release of Patriarch Tikhon on June 27, 1923 from prison, the authorities began to apply a new tactic of work to lead the Renovationist schism. The task was set to subordinate all renovationist groups to a single central body, which was supposed to acquire a more respectable appearance in order to resist "Tikhonovism." In August 1923, a decision was made to form the "Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church" instead of the All-Russian Orthodox Church. Having abandoned many church reforms, the Renovationists positioned themselves no longer as a renewed church, but as a "Soviet" church. It was the "counter-revolutionary" nature of Patriarch Tikhon that they used as the main argument in their polemic with the Patriarchal Church.

On April 2/15, 1924, Patriach Tikhon banned the leaders of the Renovationist schism from serving in the priesthood, and forbade them to have prayerful communion with the Renovationists. Subsequently, it was this date that served as a criterion for determining the dignity in which the repentant Renovators were accepted into the bosom of the Mother Church. If the ordination or consecration of Renovationists was performed before this date, then it was recognized on the condition that it was performed by bishops, although Renovationists, who received canonical consecration before going into schism.

2. The rise of renovationism

A new period began in the government's policy towards the Patriarchal Church and the tactics of supporting renovationism.

The renovationist synod was headed by Metropolitan Evdokim Meshchersky. In 1928 he was replaced in this post by Bishop Veniamin Muratovsky, and in 1930 Metropolitan Vitaly Vvedensky formally headed the Renovationist leadership. A certain upsurge of renovationism in 1925 was associated with the holding at the end of January of that year of an expanded plenum of the renovationist synod.

As of January 1, 1925, the renovationists owned 13,650 churches. By April, according to the lists presented to the head of the 6th branch of the Secret Department of the OGPU, E.A. Tuchkov by the Renovation Synod, 139 bishops were directly subordinate to the latter. In addition, the Far Eastern Regional Church Administration included 8 bishops, and 21 bishops were under the jurisdiction of the Siberian Regional Church Council. In total, there were 172 Renovationist bishops in the USSR. Of these, 36 people were ordained bishops before May 1922, 48 bishops were married. In his message, signed on July 28, 1925, Metropolitan Peter (Polyansky), Locum Tenens of the Patriarchal Throne, wrote about the uncanonicity of the Renovationist Church, their separation from the Church.

The "III Local Council of the Orthodox Church* on the Territory of the USSR" was held in Moscow from October 1 to October 10, 1925. It was attended by 334 delegates with a decisive vote - bishops, clergy, and laity. Some of the delegates hoped for reconciliation with the Patriarchal Church. However, instead of reconciliation, the split deepened. In June 1926, E.A. Tuchkov wrote: "Supporters of the renovationist church are constantly fighting the reactionary church, exposing its counter-revolutionary essence, and the Council of 1925 officially spoke out against the modern Black Hundred policy of the reactionary church."

3. The beginning of the "end"

After the Council of 1925, Renovationism began to lose its supporters catastrophically. If on October 1, 1925, the Renovationists owned 9,093 parishes throughout the country (about 30% of the total), on January 1, 1926 - 6,135 (21.7%), then on January 1, 1927 - 3,341 (16 .6%).

At the end of 1925, a line was outlined to limit the public activities of the Renovationists, and at the end of the 1920s. began a rapid decline in renovationism. In 1929, A. Vvedensky's public disputes ceased. In 1931, the Renovationist theological schools ceased to exist, and the Bulletin of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church ceased to be published. From the end of 1935, mass arrests of the episcopate, clergy, and active laity of the Renovation Church began, but some of them were released when it turned out that they had been collaborating with the OGPU-NKVD for a long time. If at the beginning of 1938 there were still 49 ruling Renovationist bishops and 31 who were at rest, then a year later, as a result of repressions, only a third of them remained, and then even fewer. In 1939, First Hierarch Vitaly Vvedensky generally forbade diocesan bishops from visiting their parish churches, as well as any ordination of priests. Since 1939, Metropolitan Vitaly, despite repeated requests, did not appoint anyone to the empty departments either. This was due to the consequences of mass repressions, which affected a significant part of the Renovationist clergy.

4. Renovationism during the war years

On the eve of the Great Patriotic War, the authorities were especially interested in the absolute loyalty of the servants of the Church. The authorities had no doubts about the loyalty of the Renovationists, many of whom were informers or secret employees of the NKVD. Some strengthening of renovationism is connected with this: in April 1941, the Higher Church Administration was restored, headed by Metropolitans Vitaly Vvedensky and Alexander Vvedensky. The latter begins to actively travel around the country, makes revisions of temples. On May 24, 1941, he came to Leningrad, where since 1938 there had been no ruling Renovationist bishop, and the diocese was temporarily ruled by Protopresbyter Alexy Abakumov. Such a strengthening of renovationism could not take place without the sanction and approval of the NKGB of the USSR. On the very first day of the war, the leaders of the Renovation Church, Metropolitans Vitaly and Alexander, issued a patriotic appeal.

In historiography, the assertion is widespread that from the beginning of the war the authorities stopped supporting the Renovationists, which resulted in the transfer of some of them to the Patriarchal Church. "The Renovationists, supported before the start of the Great Patriotic War by the official authorities, with the loss of this support, lost their influence on the believers. The most far-sighted of them began to move to the Tikhonov church. So, already in 1941, he repented and was received by Metropolitan Sergius in the rank of archbishop former Renovationist Metropolitan Vasily (Ratmirov). He was a member of the Renovationist Synod, but before the war he renounced his rank and became a simple clerk of the same Synod as a layman. Archbishop Vasily hid this fact from Metropolitan Sergius, otherwise he could only be reunited by a layman."

However, the acceptance of Vasily Ratmirov into the Patriarchal Church in 1941 was due not to his repentance, but to other reasons. Who ordained him and when, has not yet been documented. The available indications that Patriarch Tikhon did this in 1921 look doubtful, it is more likely that the renovationists did it. From 1927 to 1932, Vasily Ratmirov served his sentence in prison, in 1932 he was listed as the renovationist Bishop of Armavir, then became the Metropolitan of Kursk. According to the memoirs of the Kursk clergy, he came to the service at the cathedral "shaven, in a civilian suit, with a cigarette in his mouth under the arm with his wife." Then he was the manager of the affairs of Metropolitan Vitaly Vvedensky. On August 30, 1939, he retired, then renounced his dignity and went to work in a civil institution. Similar abdications in 1938-1939. were quite massive and, as a rule, they were committed by the clergy, associated with cooperation with the NKVD on the orders of the latter. Thus, in January 1938, Nikolay Platonov, the Renovationist "Metropolitan of Leningrad," renounced God through a newspaper.

In July 1941, Vasily Ratmirov was received in the present rank of bishop into communion by Metropolitan Sergius. On August 27, he was appointed Bishop of Kalinin. This was part of a plan by the Soviet secret services to use Ratmirov in an intelligence operation against the Germans. In 1942, the head of the 2nd department of the NKVD (intelligence, terror and sabotage behind enemy lines) P.A. Sudoplatov used it in the following way. “Operation Novices was carried out under the guise of an anti-Soviet religious underground, as it were, existing in Kuibyshev, supported by the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow. According to legend, this underground was headed by Bishop Ratmirov. He worked under the control of Zoya Rybkina in Kalinin when the city was in the hands of the Germans. With the assistance of Bishop Ratmirov and Metropolitan Sergius, we managed to introduce two young NKVD officers into the circle of churchmen who collaborated with the Germans in the occupied territory. After the liberation of the city, the bishop moved to Kuibyshev. On his behalf, we sent them from Kuibyshev under the guise of novices to the Pskov Monastery with information to the abbot, who collaborated with the German invaders ... our two "novice" officers launched a vigorous activity in the monastery. There were quite a few NKVD agents among the church ministers, which made their work easier.”

On March 22, 1943, Ratmirov was also appointed head of the Smolensk department with the title "Archbishop of Kalinin and Smolensk." According to priests who knew Bishop Vasily in those years, "the latter was a morally depraved person, but with his high-ranking connections he helped a lot both the existence of parishes and the salvation of priests from the hands of the NKVD."

After the war, by order of I.V. Stalin, Archbishop Vasily Ratmirov was awarded a gold watch and a medal. However, he understood that after he ceased to be needed by special agencies, he would not be able to stay in his place, since the church leadership was well aware of his true appearance. He was engaged in financial fraud, embezzling church money. When this came to light in 1946, in order to avoid investigation, he applied for retirement "due to illness." At the meeting of the Synod on May 13, 1947, where he was summoned to report on the missing money, he did not appear and was banned from serving. According to a statement from the Council for the Affairs of the Russian Orthodox Church, "the former Archbishop of Minsk and Belarus, Vasily, embezzled more than 10 million [ions] rubles of church money. He was fired and defrocked." Thus, Vasily Ratmirov's "repentance" was an action by the authorities to introduce into the Patriarchal Church a person necessary for carrying out an operation by special services.

The patriotic activity of the Patriarchal Church, the close cooperation of the hierarchy with the authorities in the fight against the invaders made it possible to change the attitude of the authorities towards the Russian Orthodox Church. P. A. Sudoplatov points to the consolidating role of the Russian Orthodox Church "in the growing anti-fascist movement of the Slavic peoples in the Balkans", as well as Roosevelt's requests to improve the position of the Church as the reasons that prompted Stalin to take decisions in September 1943.

It should also be noted the patriotic activity of the renovationist clergy, which the authorities also could not help but notice. Since October 1941, Alexander Vvedensky, the only head of the Renovationists, actively sent out his patriotic appeals.

However, the patriotic activity of the Patriarchal Church was more significant due to the fact that it enjoyed the support of a much larger number of believers.

In 1942 - the first half of 1943, government agencies began to gradually reject the Renovationists. This was due to a change in policy towards the Patriarchal Church.

After the meeting I.V. Stalin with the hierarchs of the Russian Orthodox Church on September 5, 1943, the fate of the Renovationist Church was sealed. The change in the attitude of the authorities towards the Church deprived the existence of the Renovationist Church of meaning, since the Renovationism was supported by the authorities in order to weaken the "reactionary", "counter-revolutionary" Patriarchal Church. However, the discrediting of renovationism as a phenomenon that arose on the basis of the idea of ​​absolute loyalty to the Soviet government, this government could not allow.

After the election of Metropolitan Sergius as Patriarch on September 8, 1943, some Renovationist bishops turned to the Patriarchate with a request to be accepted into the bosom of the Russian Orthodox Church. In his note I.V. Stalin dated October 12, 1943, Chairman of the Council for the Affairs of the Russian Orthodox Church under the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR G.G. Karpov mentioned that by this time Archbishop Pyotr Turbin of Tula, Archbishop Mikhail Postnikov, and Archbishop Andrei Rastorguev, head of the Moscow diocese, had declared their desire to join the Russian Orthodox Church. In the memorandum of G.G. Karpov wrote: “The Council for the Affairs of the Russian Orthodox Church, proceeding from the fact that the Renovation movement played its positive role at a certain stage and in recent years has no longer that significance and basis, and taking into account the patriotic positions of the Sergius Church, considers it expedient not to interfere the collapse of the Renovationist Church and the transfer of the Renovationist clergy and parishes to the Patriarchal Sergius Church". In this paragraph, I. Stalin wrote: "To Comrade Karpov. I agree with you."

The question arose before the Patriarchate about the procedure for receiving Renovationists. GG. Karpov in the mentioned note reported that Metropolitan Sergius, in a conversation with him, put forward the following conditions for accepting the Renovationists:

  • a) married metropolitans and bishops, without being defrocked, removed from church activities, leaving them behind the staff;
  • b) monastic (or widowed) metropolitans and bishops to be accepted into the patriarchal church, transferring metropolitans to archbishops or bishops, and bishops to priests, allowing their subsequent restoration to their former rank.

After the approval of I.V. Stalin of this memorandum GG. Karpov, a mass transition of the Renovationists to the Patriarchal Church began. On October 16, the Council sent out an information letter to the localities, which noted that “in cases where the Renovationist clergy voluntarily transfer from the Renovationist orientation to the Patriarchal Sergius Church, they should not be hindered. Also, one should not hinder the transition of groups of believers or parishes as a whole along the desire of believers from the Renovationist to the Sergius Church. The conditions for the reception of metropolitans, bishops and priests of the Renovationist orientation are established by Patriarch Sergius and his episcopate in place."

In historiography, the opinion has been established that the first of the Renovationist bishops in 1943 was Juvenaly (Mashkovsky). Such a conclusion was drawn from the resolution of Patriarch Sergius at the address of the Renovationist Archbishop Mikhail Postnikov of October 31, 1943. In it, the Patriarch wrote about his ordination: behind him the metropolitanate, and from then on he called himself simply a bishop. Let the example of Bishop Juvenaly be a subject of imitation for the petitioner."

However, the repentance of Juvenaly, who was Metropolitan of Odessa in the Renovationist schism, took place as early as 1935. He was received as a bishop of the old order in the rank of bishop, but he was given a penance, which he underwent in Vladimir. On March 6, 1936, he was appointed Bishop of Bryansk by Metropolitan Sergius, but did not enter the administration of the diocese, on April 24, 1936 he was arrested in Vladimir, and on September 21 he was sentenced to five years in a camp and died in custody.

On October 31, 1943, Patriarch Sergius wrote the aforementioned resolution at the address of Archbishop Mikhail Postnikov. From the latter's memorandum it followed that he did not repent of his stay with the Renovationists, and his departure from there was due to the fact that "many of them turned out to be faulty in behavior." The resolution of the Patriarch stated: “The main sin of renovationism is not that not all of its representatives turned out to be impeccable in life, but that renovationism, as a corporation or, in the language of the canons, as an unauthorized gathering, broke away from the Holy Church” and another altar set up" (St. App. right. 31). And not only erected an altar for themselves, but also fought in every possible way against St. Churches, trying to tear away the church sheep. This is a sin that, according to the teaching of the holy fathers, is not washed away even by martyr's blood.

At the session of October 20, 22, 26 and 28, 1943, the Synod considered appeals, in addition to Mikhail Postnikov, Yaroslavl Renovationist Metropolitan Kornily Popov and Tula Archbishop Pyotr Turbin, and decided that the Renovationist bishops ordained before the decision of Patriarch Tikhon of April 15, 1924 , are accepted in their current rank according to a simplified scheme, and those ordained after this date and unmarried must receive episcopal rank in the Russian Orthodox Church.

On November 5, 1943, Mikhail Postnikov, who was ordained on October 13, 1922 by the Renovationist bishops of the old order, was received in the rank of bishop. In his word of repentance, he fulfilled the requirements of Patriarch Sergius of October 31, 1943: he repented of evading schism, and did not claim to retain renovationist ranks and awards. Patriarch Sergius, placing an omophorion on him, recited a permissive prayer over him and placed on him a bishop's panagia.

In mid-October 1943, Alexander Vvedensky, the head of the Renovation Church, returned to Moscow and took over the management of the Moscow diocese, which consisted of 9 parishes. The authorities in every possible way prevented his return, since he raised the issue of transferring the Renovationist Church to the jurisdiction of the Council for Religious Affairs, which would actually legitimize its existence as an organization independent of the Russian Orthodox Church. But his request was denied without any explanation.

The return of Renovationist Metropolitan Alexander Vvedensky to Moscow in mid-October 1943 and the unwillingness of the Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church to accept all Renovationist hierarchs in their existing rank slowed down the process of eliminating Renovationism. This topic was the subject of a conversation between Patriarch Sergius and Chairman of the Council for the Russian Orthodox Church G.G. Karpov, which took place on November 25, 1943. Karpov was interested in the possibility of accepting married bishops in their current rank. The patriarch explained that the monastic episcopate was established by the 6th Ecumenical Council (beginning of the 7th century), and since then the Russian Orthodox and other Orthodox churches have not accepted a married episcopate. Karpov expressed the opinion that it would be desirable, in the interests of accelerating the transition of the Renovationist clergy, not to impose strict requirements upon their admission, with which the Patriarch agreed, noting, however, that he would accept everyone without hindrance, but would not be able to get around the basic canonical requirements, such as: he cannot have a married episcopate and cannot have priests who are in a second marriage, especially since he wants and must reckon with the opinion of the believing masses.

For the Council and its chairman, the entry into the Russian Orthodox Church of the head of Renovationism, Alexander Vvedensky, was desirable. This would clearly indicate that we are not talking about the return of the "repentant" Renovationists, but about the merging of two churches into one. However, Vvedensky himself hoped to the last that the authorities would allow the existence of the renovationist church, at least in a minimal amount.

The question of Vvedensky was also asked to Patriarch Karpov at this meeting. Patriarch Sergius replied that there were no appeals from Vvedensky and he does not allow the possibility of such appeals. At the same time, the Patriarch pointed out that Alexander Vvedensky could not be received not only by a bishop, but also by a simple priest, since he was married three times, although he had no personal antipathy towards him.

The conditions for the reception of the Renovationists were once again discussed at the meeting of Patriarch Sergius with Karpov on December 7, 1943. At the meetings of December 8 and 9, 1943, the Holy Synod decided: “Renovationist bishops, presbyters and deacons, asking to be accepted into communion with the Holy Church , they repent before the confessor indicated by the church authorities, moreover, they renounce all communion with the Renovation movement, as proof of the sincerity of their conversion, renounce any awards received for service in the Renovation movement, and make an oath promise to remain faithful servants of the Holy Church until the end of their lives. before the confessor may, at the discretion of the church authorities, be replaced by public repentance in the temple, if the circumstances of the case require such a replacement", and further: "... the Patriarchal prohibition of April 2, 1924, weighing on all renovationists, may not serve as an obstacle to acceptance into the sacred the ranks of those renovationist protégés who are seen to be assisting and facilitating the reunification of others, moreover, they were appointed bishops who do not cause canonical doubts. However, only those who hasten to turn with repentance before Holy Pascha of the upcoming 1944 (April 3/16) can take advantage of such exceptional indulgence."

The Synod approved the rules for the reception of the Renovationist clergy at the regular session on December 10. This was the result of a compromise between Karpov, who sought the most painless procedure for admission to the Russian Orthodox Church for the Renovationists, and Patriarch Sergius, who sought to ensure that the reception of the Renovationists did not look like a simple association.

The Synod referred to the decree of Patriarch Tikhon of April 2 (15), 1924, in which the Patriarch forbade all Renovationist clergy from serving in the priesthood, as well as his decree of March 4 (17), 1924, in which he recognized only those Renovationist consecrations, "in which at least one bishop of the old, pre-renovation ordination participated."

On December 4, 1943, Kornily Popov, the Renovationist Metropolitan of Yaroslavl and Kostroma, was received into the Russian Orthodox Church as a bishop. His consecration as bishop of Rybinsk, vicar of the diocese of Yaroslavl, took place on July 5, 1915. In 1923, he declined into the Renovationist schism.

On December 9, 1943, at a meeting of the Synod, the petitions of the Renovationist bishops, Bishop of Tashkent Sergius Larin and Archbishop of Alma-Ata Anatoly Sinitsyn, were reviewed for their acceptance into the Russian Orthodox Church. The question of their reception was previously discussed by Patriarch Sergius with Karpov. The synod adopted a resolution on their reception by the laity: “In view of the fact that all the ordinations of Anatoly Sinitsyn were received by him from the renovationist bishops after the late Patriarch Tikhon imposed a ban on them, he can be accepted according to church rules only in the rank of a layman, which does not exclude the possibility of him receiving Orthodox ordination ".

Bishop Sergius Larin, who had only Renovationist consecrations, in 1936, being an archpriest, was convicted under Art. 118 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR for three years and served his sentence in the Kolyma camp. On November 10, 1941, he was consecrated bishop of Zvenigorodsky, vicar of the Moscow diocese, and ruled the Moscow diocese during the evacuation of A. Vvedensky. At the time of his Renovationist episcopal consecration, Larin had already been associated with cooperation with the state security agencies for several years, which instructed Vvedensky to raise him to the rank of bishop. In 1944, at the insistence of Karpov, Sergiy Larin was included in the list of clergy compiled by Metropolitan Nikolai (Yarushevich) who were nominated for the medal "For the Defense of Moscow".

The very next day after the meeting of the Synod, on December 10, 1943, Larin left Tashkent for Moscow, entrusting Archbishop Anatoly Sinitsyn with the temporary administration of the diocese. On December 27, 1943, Larin was received into the Russian Orthodox Church with the rank of monk and immediately ordained a hieromonk. He was planned to be sent to Stavropol. However, leaving far from Moscow, and even under the command of Archbishop Anthony (Romanovsky), who was strict towards the Renovationists, did not suit either Larin himself or the authorities. On January 11, 1944, during another conversation with Karpov, Patriarch Sergius asked what the future fate of Larin should be, to which the chairman of the Council for the Affairs of the Russian Orthodox Church replied that he would not object to his elevation to the episcopal rank*. Prior to his consecration as a bishop on August 15, 1944, Larin served as a priest in Zagorsk.

On January 11, 1944, Archbishop Anatoly Sinitsyn, as administrator of the Central Asian diocese, adopted a decree "On the transfer of the diocese to the administration of Patriarch Sergius." They sent a telegram to Moscow, which said: “Expressing the unanimous desire of the entire diocese of church unity, supported by our authority, we ask Your Holiness to accept us as a diocese “status qvo”, canonical communion and administrative subordination, preserving our leadership of the diocese. The Diocese has been ordered to offer services in the name of Your Holiness. Lighten up the answer. The delay in the answer threatens the collapse of the church business. In response, the Patriarchate sent an extract from the decision of the Synod of December 9, 1943, stating that Bishop Anatoly Sinitsyn can only be accepted into canonical communion with the rank of a layman, which does not exclude the possibility of him receiving Orthodox ordination.

Archbishop Andrei Rastorguev, being married, was received in the rank that he had before the transition to the Renovationists - the priestly. Together with him, on December 21, 1943, the archpriest and deacon of the Church of the Resurrection of Christ in Sokolniki in Moscow, whose rector Rastorguev continued to remain until his death in 1970, repented. Rastorguev managed to achieve a position as a teacher of the Old Testament and the Jewish language at the Theological Institute. He was released from teaching the Hebrew language immediately after the end of the first quarter of 1944 "because of unpreparedness." In August 1945, for the same reason, he was relieved of his duties as a teacher of the Holy Scriptures of the Old Testament at the Theological Institute and Biblical history in pastoral courses.

On January 5, 1944, the former Renovationist Metropolitan Tikhon Popov was received into communion with the Russian Orthodox Church in the rank of archpriest. According to his investigation file, back in 1920 he became a secret informant for the Cheka. On August 28, 1944, he was approved as the rector of the Theological Institute that opened in Moscow, and in August 1946 he already headed the Moscow Theological Academy and Seminary. However, in October 1946, for health reasons, he was forced to leave the rectorship. His appointment was also connected with the Council's policy of strengthening the positions of the former renovationists, with the help of which the authorities could control the most important areas of church activity, primarily spiritual education and external church relations.

On December 20, 1943, a petition for acceptance into the Russian Orthodox Church was sent from Kostroma by a provincial bishop, Sergiy Ivantsov. He was a secret employee of the state security organs since 1924. Alexander Vvedensky offered him the place of Metropolitan Krutitsky, the manager of the affairs of the first hierarch. He was received into the Russian Orthodox Church only on September 25, 1945.

Renovationist Archbishop of Tula and Belevsky Pyotr Turbin was accepted into the priesthood.

In their autobiographies, the former Renovationists considered the time they were in schism to be the time of service to the Church. There are many examples of this kind. This contributed to the strengthening of the church underground, whose members urged believers not to go to churches, "where the former Renovationists simply play the fool, who used to take pictures of girls and serve as accountants to Soviet power."

In the mid 1940s. a new religious subculture began to form - opposition to the official Church. This happened not least because of the state policy aimed at merging the Patriarchal Church and renovationism.

Bishops who tried to really eliminate renovationism were actively persecuted by the authorities. So, Archbishop Luka (Voyno-Yasenetsky), who headed the Tambov diocese in February 1944, was under constant pressure from the local commissioner, who, through the secretary of the diocese, Archpriest John Leoferov, became aware of all the statements and actions of the bishop. Archbishop Luke was dissatisfied with the way the Patriarch received the former renovationists, and was going to send him his "reception order." The Tambov plenipotentiary sent several memorandums to the Council about Luke's "reactionary" views: "The staff is recruiting from reactionary-minded clergy. The first question is whether the renovationist or not, and the second ... was he under arrest. When he receives an answer that the clergyman is from the old church and was under arrest, then he willingly accepts a questionnaire from such people.

The question of the anti-renovation activities of Archbishop Luka was raised by Karpov on March 25, 1944, during a reception at the Council of Metropolitan Alexy, who wrote down the following about this conversation: "They talked about Archbishop Luke, who acts very tactlessly - preaching ... and other complete misunderstanding of the situation" *. Chairman of the Council Karpov also raised this issue at a meeting with Patriarch Sergius on May 5, 1944. He stated that Luka "made slanderous attacks against the Renovationist clergy"*. Patriarch Sergius was denied a request to transfer Archbishop Luke closer to Moscow - to the Tula see, where in the same year, at the insistence of Karpov, the former Renovationist Metropolitan Vitaly (Vvedensky) was appointed.

Archbishop Luka was very worried that in the Russian Orthodox Church there were many former renovationist bishops who were changing the face of the Orthodox Church. On November 21-23, 1944, a Council of Bishops was held in Moscow, which was supposed to prepare the upcoming Local Council of the Russian Orthodox Church. According to the report of the Tambov Commissioner to Karpov, Archbishop Luka spoke about this in a conversation with the clergy of the diocese: “Forty-four bishops came to the pre-council meeting in Moscow, of which there were more than 50% of the Renovationists, and when I knew about this, I was indignant and determined in advance, that there will be no sense from this, it just happened, as, for example: the preparation for the election of the Patriarch is distorted, it has already been announced that one Patriarch will be elected, and not three candidates, from which one of the three should be chosen by lot, besides, voting will be openly and for Patriarch Alexy alone, this is the order that I alone opposed, and no one supported me in this, after in a conversation, individual bishops sympathized with me in this.

The situation seemed so serious to the authorities that they took extreme measures. As the Tambov researcher S.A. Chebotarev, on the day of his supposed departure for the Local Council, Archbishop Luke was poisoned and nearly died. On April 5, 1946, Patriarch Alexy signed a decree on the transfer of Archbishop Luka to Simferopol.

All Renovationist bishops who could be directly manipulated went over to the Russian Orthodox Church in December 1943 - January 1944. The Renovationist First Hierarch Alexander Vvedensky made desperate attempts to keep at least some of the bishops, and he partially succeeded in this temporarily. On February 29, 1944, on his own initiative, he visited Karpov. In an effort to prevent the final disintegration of the Renovationist organization, he asked that the title of Metropolitan of Krasnodar Archbishop Vladimir Ivanov be conferred. Karpov objected, saying that Ivanov remained in the occupied territory and could cooperate with the Germans. Vvedensky also reported that he had received a telegram from Bishop Gabriel Olkhovik, who lived in Kyrgyzstan, who remained faithful to Renovationism and asked what measures to take against the transfer of parishes to the Russian Orthodox Church. Since 1934, this bishop has been out of state "due to obvious incapacity and illiteracy", being the rector of the temple. In the absence of other candidates, after the accession to the Russian Orthodox Church of Bishop Sergius (Larin) and the statement of Archbishop Anatoly (Sinitsyn) about submission to Patriarch Sergius, Vvedensky proposed to appoint Bishop Gabriel Olkhovik as Archbishop of Central Asia with a stay in Tashkent. Vvedensky tried to keep about 90 Central Asian parishes under his control, subordinating them to his bishop.

Convinced of Karpov's inflexibility, Vvedensky, who was not used to arguing with the authorities, asked to appoint Gavriil Olkhovik as a vicar to Metropolitan Filaret Yatsenko in Sverdlovsk. Thus, Vvedensky renounced his claims to the preservation of renovationism in Central Asia. Karpov also refused a request to send Filaret Yatsenko to Ukraine, stating that there were no Renovationist churches in Ukraine, although, according to the Council for the Affairs of the Russian Orthodox Church, by October 1, 1944, there were 102 Renovationist churches, where 47 priests and 7 deacons served. and 23 psalmists.

Not without hidden irony, Karpov reported in his report on a conversation with Alexander Vvedensky about the latter's confidence in the loyalty of Metropolitan Vitaly Vvedensky, who, according to the head of renovationism, "would rather die than go over to the Patriarchal Church." At the time of the conversation, the Chairman of the Council already knew that Metropolitan Vitaly had agreed to join the Russian Orthodox Church. A day later, on March 2, 1944, the oldest Renovationist bishop by consecration, Vitaly Vvedensky, repented in Chisty Lane and was received in the rank of bishop with a brief resignation. In May of the same year, he received the rank of archbishop, and in July he was appointed to the Tula and Belev cathedras.

Bishops obedient to the authorities, such as Vitaly and other former renovationists, were an ideal option for local commissioners. With their help, the authorities sought to completely control church life, preventing the activities of illegal clergy. In March 1944, Renovationist Metropolitan Mikhail Orlov was received as archpriest. He took monastic vows with the name Jonah and was consecrated Bishop of Voronezh.

historian 1900

  • - Kataev Valentin Petrovich, writer, Hero of Socialist Labor. Brother E.P. Petrov. From 1922 he lived in Moscow. Since 1923, a permanent contributor to the newspapers Gudok, Pravda, Trud, Rabochaya Gazeta...

    Moscow (encyclopedia)

  • - KATAEV Valentin Petrovich - a modern writer. R. in Odessa in the family of a teacher. He was published in Odessa Leaflet, in the magazines Ves Mir, Awakening, Lukomorye ...

    Literary Encyclopedia

  • - KATAEV Ivan is a modern writer. R. in the family of a professor. He began to print in 1921 ...

    Literary Encyclopedia

  • - KATAEV Valentin Petrovich, Russian. owls. writer. In 1936 he wrote a story for youth "The Lonely Sail Turns White"...

    Lermontov Encyclopedia

  • - auth. Awakening story...
  • - Historian...

    Big biographical encyclopedia

  • - Historian 1900...

    Big biographical encyclopedia

  • is a contemporary writer. Genus. in the professor's family. He began publishing in 1921. In the first years of his literary activity, Kataev wrote poetry, but recently he has switched to prose. Member of the CPSU...

    Big biographical encyclopedia

  • - historian of local peasants. institution, business zemst...

    Big biographical encyclopedia

  • - auth. "Essay on the history of Russian church sermons", priest ...

    Big biographical encyclopedia

  • - auth. book. "On the question of the theory of social development" ...

    Big biographical encyclopedia

  • - auth. collection rassk. and dram. prod. "Russian intellectuals" ...

    Big biographical encyclopedia

  • - I Kataev Valentin Petrovich, Russian Soviet writer. Member of the CPSU since 1958. Born in the family of a teacher. Brother of the writer E. P. Petrov. Started printing in 1910...
  • - Russian Soviet writer. Member of the CPSU since 1958. Born in the family of a teacher. Brother of the writer E. P. Petrov. He began to publish in 1910. In 1915‒17 he was at the front...

    Great Soviet Encyclopedia

  • - Russian writer, Hero of Socialist Labor. Brother of E. P. Petrov. In the plays of the 20s. - the fight against philistinism. The novel "Time, forward!" dedicated to socialist construction...

    Big encyclopedic dictionary

  • - Zharg. corner. Jottle-iron. Jail. Grachev 1997, 65; SRVS 1, 120; SRVS 2, 172; SRVS 3, 86...

    Big dictionary of Russian sayings

"Kataev, I.M." in books

Kataev-75

From the book Foremen of the Spirit author Voznesensky Andrey Andreevich

Kataev-75 Here he is swaying half-turned towards you - in his sovereign chair, in a gray-black large-knit jacket, as in heavy chain mail, and even in a chasuble, his bangs are shifted to his forehead - this is how the dangerous cap-small visor was shifted from the back of the head from the back of the head inhabitants of post-war backyards.

KATAEV VALENTIN

From the book How idols left. The last days and hours of people's favorites the author Razzakov Fedor

KATAEV VALENTIN KATAEV VALENTIN (writer: “The lonely sail turns white”, “Grass of oblivion”, etc.; died on April 12, 1986 at the 90th year of his life). Despite his advanced age, Kataev was a healthy person. And he could live up to a hundred years. But he was finished off by the repair, which the builders

KATAEV Valentin

From the book The Shining of Unfading Stars the author Razzakov Fedor

KATAEV Valentin KATAEV Valentin (writer: “Time, forward!” (1932), “The lonely sail turns white” (1936–1961), “Son of the regiment” (1945), “Small iron door in the wall” (1964), “Holy well "(1966)," Grass of Oblivion "(1967)," My Diamond Crown "(1978) and others; died on April 12, 1986 at the 90th year

V. Kataev Meetings with Bulgakov

From the book Memories of Mikhail Bulgakov author Bulgakova Elena Sergeevna

V. Kataev Meetings with Bulgakov Bulgakov was an amazing writer. And I, who happened to meet with him almost daily in the earliest years of our creative life, in the first years of Soviet power, when we worked at Gudok, never ceased to be amazed at the brilliant

Kataev and the Beatles

From the book Queen of White Elephants author Burkin Yuly Sergeevich

Kataev and the Beatles I went to Sverdlovsk to receive a copy of the Queen of the White Elephants CD. It turned out that the weather was my favorite: a little sun, a little coolness, cloudy but light. I got to the factory, called the front desk, they told me that the disk was ready and already

VALENTIN KATAEV

From the author's book

VALENTIN KATAEV Irakli Andronikov is a unique phenomenon. Never before has Russian culture and Russian art created anything like this. Andronikov is a literary critic, a connoisseur of Russian classics, a researcher of the life and work of Lermontov and Pushkin. In this area he did

Kataev Gennady Nikolaevich

From the book I fought in Afghanistan. A front without a front line author Severin Maxim Sergeevich

Kataev Gennady Nikolaevich I served in Alma-Ata, and one fine day we learned that four people were needed along with generator machines that supplied power to the radio stations. So they decided to send me and three other guys along with the equipment to Afghanistan. The bosses don't

Ivan Kataev

From the book Life will go out, but I will stay: Collected works author Glinka Gleb Alexandrovich

Ivan Kataev “We ​​are fighting for future generations, they are destined to take advantage of the fruits of our struggle. And we must fearlessly sacrifice ourselves. Both you and I are only lambs to be slaughtered, and there is nothing for us to achieve from life for ourselves something bright. It just gets in the way

Valentin Kataev

From the book "Catch pigeon mail ...". Letters (1940–1990) author Aksenov Vasily From the book Big Dictionary of Quotes and Popular Expressions author Dushenko Konstantin Vasilievich

KATAEV, Valentin Petrovich (1897–1986), writer 113 Want, want, endure. “The Lonely Sail Is Whitening”, a story (1936), ch. 7? Kataev V.P. Sobr. op. in 10 volumes - M., 1984, v. 4, p. 39 114 - How do you live, carp? / – Wow, merci. "Radio Giraffe" (1926)? Dep. ed. - M., 1927, p. 6 Repeated in

KATAEV VALENTIN PETROVICH

From the book Dictionary of Aphorisms of Russian Writers author Tikhonov Alexander Nikolaevich

KATAEV VALENTIN PETROVICH Valentin Petrovich Kataev (1897-1986). Russian writer, Hero of Socialist Labor, laureate of the USSR State Prize. Author of the novels "Waves of the Black Sea", "Ehrendorf Island", "Lord of Iron", "Time, forward", "Youthful novel of my old

Poet Valentin Kataev

From the book Kukish proshlyakam author Kruchenykh Alexey Eliseevich

Mikhail Kataev was born in 1903 in the village of Osmeryzhsk, Kachirsky district, Pavlodar region, in the family of a poor peasant. Russian. Due to material deprivation, Mikhail barely managed to finish elementary school. In 1925 he was drafted into the Red Army. He served in the cavalry troops on one of the sections of the southern border, took part in the liquidation of the remnants of the Basmachi bands. After demobilization, in 1927, fellow villagers elected M. M. Kataev as chairman of the village council. He takes an active part in the creation of the collective farm "Red Plowman".

Before the Great Patriotic War, M. M. Kataev worked in Pavlodar as an accountant of the city health department. At the front since 1941.

In the battles near Moscow, the heroic chronicle of the front-line life of Mikhail Maksimovich Kataev began. For his courage and bravery, he was awarded the Order of the Red Star.

Overcoming the stubborn resistance of the enemy, units of the 7th Guards Cavalry Corps, in which Guards Sergeant Kataev fought as a gunner of the 7th Guards Anti-tank Fighter Division, approached the Dnieper at the end of September 1943. On the night of September 26-27, 1943, the guard foreman Kataev, with three crews of anti-tank rifles, having built a raft from improvised material, began crossing to the western bank of the Dnieper under heavy machine-gun fire from the enemy. Almost in the middle of the river, the raft was broken. But the brave warrior did not lose his head, in full combat gear, Mikhail Maksimovich rushed into the water, captivating the rest of the fighters with his personal example. Having reached the shore first, the foreman of the guard entered into an unequal battle with the enemy. Under the cover of night, Kataev, with a group of daredevils who came to the rescue, crawled to the trenches, threw grenades at them and destroyed 8 German soldiers from his personal weapons. The boundless love for the Motherland, the courage and bravery shown by M. M. Kataev during the crossing of the Dnieper ensured the successful overcoming of the water barrier.

The motherland highly appreciated the feat of our fellow countryman. By decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on January 15, 1944, Mikhail Maksimovich Kataev was awarded the high title of Hero of the Soviet Union.

In January 1944, our troops fought for the liberation of southeastern Belarus from the fascist evil spirits. On January 26, units of the 7th Guards Cavalry Corps, having broken the stubborn resistance of the enemy, broke into the city of Mozyr. Fierce fighting ensued on the streets of the city. Under the onslaught of Soviet troops, the enemy began to leave the city. Fascist tanks tried to leave along one of the streets. Mikhail Kataev ordered his soldiers to go around, and he himself threw two grenades into the front tank one after another. But the tank continued to move forward. Then the Hero of the Soviet Union M. M. Kataev with the remaining grenades rushes under the tank. The hero died, but the blazing tank also stopped, a traffic jam formed, and the armor-piercers who came to the rescue knocked out several Vrayases vehicles. Soon, the scarlet banner of the country of the Soviets flew over the Belarusian city of Mozyr.

The feat of M. M. Kataev is not forgotten. One of the streets of Mozyr bears the name of the Hero of the Soviet Union M. Kataev. In the center of the city there is a shield with a portrait of the Hero and a description of his feat.

The memory of the Hero is also sacredly revered by Pavlodar residents. One of the streets of the city is named after him. A memorial plaque was installed on the building where M. M. Kataev worked before the war.


Counter

Valentin Petrovich Kataev is a world famous writer. But these are dry, general words. It is especially dear to Odessans. Who else could describe our city with such sincere love as Valentin Petrovich in the story “The lonely sail turns white”? Without whom, there would not be not only everyone's favorite books, but even the image of Ostap Bender, without which Odessa would not be Odessa?

The granddaughter of Valentin Kataev is called Tina. This petite woman editor of the Moscow magazine "In the world of science", a well-known journalist.

Catching bandits is easier than writing:
- According to the memoirs of Valentin Petrovich, it was he who gave the idea of ​​"12 chairs". Is it really true?

Yes. The situation developed in this way. Yevgeny Kataev came from Odessa to Moscow to visit his older brother. And he decided to show how independent he is - he got a job in the criminal investigation department. Grandfather had the main task - to come up with anything, just so that he would voluntarily leave from there. Firstly, life-threatening, and secondly, Eugene was very young and emotional. Grandfather began to invite him to write. He says: “Well, is it really easier for you to catch bandits than to write?” At first, Kataev Jr. composed feuilletons for Gudok. Later he met Ilf, they came to the grandfather. (In order not to have two Kataev writers, they decided that the younger brother - it seems that he had not grown up to the elder one - would have a pseudonym, and took Petrov in honor of his father.) Together they discussed what they would write like that. And the grandfather says: “Guys, I’m your master, and you can say auxiliary workers, I’ll tell you the topic now, I’ll give you an idea, you will write everything to me, and I’ll go through the master’s hand. Dumas has a brilliant idea. Let's say there is a certain treasure, value or something that is hidden in a certain number of objects. Let's write to me on this subject. Will watch later". Kataev forgot about it, but they took and wrote "The Twelve Chairs". And when they brought the novel, so that he walked over it with the hand of a master, he said: “Guys, why do you need me? You did great."

So the idea was actually his. Grandfather managed to connect two people who had a complementary gift.

Moreover, he said: “That's it. I take off my last name, I don’t pass by the master’s hand, you are only for submitting the idea - a golden cigarette case! Well, they were upset - it would be a little expensive, but they gave him a cigarette case. Golden, but small, feminine.

So, it was Valentin Petrovich who introduced Ilf and Petrov?

It was a certain literary environment where everyone was familiar with each other. Naturally, when Petrov arrived in Moscow, grandfather introduced him to everyone he knew, but then he got to know himself.

Playing with ears and "Collected Works"

Did Valentin Petrovich tell you anything about his childhood spent in Odessa?

Grandfather's childhood memories are, in fact, “A lonely sail turns white” and “Waves of the Black Sea”. This is all, of course, fiction, but it is very clearly based on childhood memories.

And the fisherman's hut, and...?

Yes. Fictional characters had a real basis.

The images are collective, but there were similar people. Moreover, this work can be used to study the history of Odessa at that time. Let's take the history of the costume. Or, for example, playing with ears is an absolutely clear sign of that time. Even the description of the button matches one to one.

Did your grandfather know Bunin?

Kataev's literary career began with the fact that at the age of seven he started a stack of notebooks and wrote "Collected Works" on it.

At the age of sixteen he came to Bunin.

Bunin was the greatest writer of that time, recognized, but he was famous for his difficult character and did not accept young authors well. Grandfather brought him a notebook with poems, left. And when he came to find out the result, Bunin accepted it. In principle, Kataev did not count on this. Thus began their creative communication. When grandfather was already an accomplished writer, Bunin immigrated. He lived in Paris, wrote "Dark Alleys" and they did not communicate, because it was the Soviet era, and it was simply dangerous for the fate of grandfather. Bunin was very worried about him, he was afraid to send letters, and when delegations of Soviet writers came to Paris, he said “No-no-no-no-no, I don’t want to know anything.” Later, grandparents were in France, they visited Bunin's wife. This was a few years after his death. His wife greeted them with meringues. She remembered that when, at the age of sixteen, her grandfather came to visit them, he said that these were his favorite cakes.

My coffin will hit the railing of the stairs

What are Kataev's impressions of Bulgakov?

Relationships have changed throughout life. But Bulgakov was close to him. Grandfather in his old age recalled how sensitive Bulgakov was and a brilliant artist, because he said "When I die, when they carry me out of the house, my coffin will hit something on the railing of the stairs." In addition to some human things, spiritual ties were very strong.

70 percent sixties

I believe that in our time and in our literature this is not the case.

Maybe the sixties had some kind of surge, but in principle, now we have come to a stalemate in this regard. Our life must be formed in some other way in order for a new surge to occur. The foam should subside.

As for the sixties - after all, Valentin Petrovich was the editor of the magazine "Youth" and he was the first to start publishing them? Yevtushenko, Akhmadulin and all the others?

Yes, he was the editor-in-chief of the magazine for six years (from 1955 to 1961) and his main task was to find young talented writers. He pulled out Aksyonov - Vasily Aksyonov and Anatoly Gladilin, whom he simply adored. He found Voznesensky, Yevtushenko, Bella Akhmadulina and others.

Christmas too?

Rozhdestvensky was himself famous, but, nevertheless, yes. In principle, 70 percent of the sixties - this is the grandfather took out. And he had an absolutely amazing assistant, comrade-in-arms - Maria Lazarevna Ozerova. She is still alive. They both fought. And such a situation occurred - they began to tighten the screws on him. They began to say, “But this should not be published,” a certain amount of pressure. He stepped down as editor-in-chief of his own accord. Khrushchev was completely furious, he said "I have none of the chief editors has the right to submit an application of their own free will." They couldn’t really poison him, he was too famous, but his works were no longer mentioned in the press. He beautifully left, said that he wanted to do only creativity. Didn't let anyone down, but it still angered me. And he actually left due to the fact that he could no longer do what he considered necessary.

Mayakovsky and runny nose

Very good relations were with Yesenin. This is both youth and the atmosphere of the inseparability of life from art, one circle, one impulse.

He was also in very close relations with Mayakovsky. Before perestroika, there were different versions of Mayakovsky's death. Someone said that it was the Cheka who provoked his murder, and his beloved ...

Lila Brik?

No, not Lilya Brik, but the second one. Polonskaya. It was said that she could have shot him. Grandfather saw him the day before his death, or rather in the evening. He said that Mayakovsky had a runny nose and a disgusting mood. This is what happens when the last drop is missing. He said that Mayakovsky tried to commit suicide several times. Moreover, he inserted one cartridge, and left notes.

The only Russian writer

Valentin Petrovich was a corresponding member of the Goncourt Academy, how was that possible in those days?

Whatever the times, whatever the closed country, there are still international literary academies, communities. And since the works of a person are still published, then according to certain works, he is elected an honorary member. At the Academy of Goncourt at that time, Kataev was the only Russian writer. Very often Lano and Bazin came to our house and received them all.

Accept-accepted, but Kataev was released abroad?

Yes, grandfather was released, because whatever the real dictatorship in the country, in order to exist in the international community, it has several positions, especially those related to culture and science. It seems like we are still close to a normal human community and open. Therefore, a number of Soviet writers have always had the opportunity to travel.

In order to take out a group of writers that no one in the world knows about, one surname was needed that everyone knew. They took grandfather and took ten more unknown writers.

"You don't have to know someone to love someone"

Kataev was also related to the film "Circus" ...

He and his brother wrote the script for the film. But when the film came out, too many pro-Soviet things were put in there, and they removed their names. Although the "Circus" in my opinion the film is very good. I imagine how good he could be if they...

Didn't fix anything?

And how did Valentin Petrovich feel about the fact that Madame Storozhenko was played by Ranevskaya?

He adored Ranevskaya.

They knew each other, right?

You don't have to know someone to love someone. For him, it was an actress of the highest level.

Vanya Solntsev never existed

And where did Valentin Petrovich live in Odessa as a child, in what area?

Kulikovo field. Not where the lane named after him. On the other side. Now this house is no more. Therefore, we can only tentatively say where it was. In principle, the Kataevs in Odessa lived in three houses and always in rented apartments.

On the Kulikovo field - this was the first apartment where he lived when he was very young. As was described in "The lonely sail turns white."

Valentin Petrovich worked during the Great Patriotic War as a war correspondent for Krasnaya Zvezda?

in the Soviet Information Bureau. This was the main thing, and publications could go to both Pravda and Krasnaya Zvezda.

- Is “Son of the Regiment” to some extent the result of work at the front?

Yes, and Viaduct. But the most common misconception is associated with the "Son of the Regiment". Vanya Solntsev never existed. This is a collective image. Grandfather saw at least ten or twenty such sons of the regiment. He assembled Vanya Solntsev from the image of all these children. And thanks to the fact that the "Son of the Regiment" became popular, the "sons of the regiment" movement began. That is, although Vanya Solntsev was not there, each of these people thought that it was about him. For Kataev, this was very important. That everyone should be recognized, if any of them are still alive - they should be treated as heroes.

A funny thing happened to my friend. In the fifth or sixth grade, we went through “Son of the Regiment” and she was given the task - to write what the writer Kataev was thinking about, what he wanted to put into the image of Vanya. Naturally, living two dachas from us, she came to her grandfather and asked to tell what he had in mind. He said. She was given a three with a minus for her essay - she and Kataev were wrong. And this is a very common misconception associated with well-known literary works.

It is often said that grandfather received Stalin's prizes, was awarded many state awards - this is not true. Despite the fact that his name was used - for international affairs, he was awarded only once, for the "Son of the Regiment" Stalin Prize, but - the second degree.

Circle in the round

But "The Wasters" became a bestseller in the United States.

Somewhere in the twenties the play was on Broadway. "Squanderers" and "Squaring the circle," two things were on there. When we were in America, the Americans showed us a theater called "Circle in the round". They said that it was in honor of the Square of the Circle, which was staged here. That was the name of the theater, it still exists.

Actually, a very funny thing is connected with the "Quadrature of the circle" and the "Squanderers". Kataev was paid an awesome fee for those times - twenty dollars for the right to use the work for the rest of his grandfather's life. He also had other performances there, and Petrov went to America (as a result of which High-Rise America appeared) and somehow received grandfather's fees. And by the time my mother was born, a Blue Washington Ford was delivered from America to Moscow. My grandmother was standing at the window with my newborn mother, and this luxurious car was brought to her.

In 1965, the story "Dear, sweet grandfather" was written - is it about you?

Not exactly about me, but then again he doesn't have things that are written exactly about someone or based on something. But it was really me who inspired him. We watched "Eugene Onegin", I could not stand the opera and periodically commented on everything that was happening on the stage. On the basis of my comments, a work was born to him.

And Kataev did not want to return to live in Odessa?

Wanted. But I was very worried about the fact that in Odessa there would never be hot water anyway ...

Valeria BURLAKOVA, Odessa

Kataev Valentin Petrovich (1897–1986), Russian writer Hero of Socialist Labor (1974). Born on January 16 (28), 1897 in Odessa in the family of a teacher, a teacher at a diocesan school.

Pyotr Vasilievich Kataev; came from a clergy background. Mother, Evgenia Ivanovna Bachey - the daughter of General Ivan Eliseevich Bachey, from a Poltava small-scale noble family. Subsequently, Kataev gave the name of his father and the surname of his mother to the main, largely autobiographical hero of the tetralogy "Waves of the Black Sea" - Petya Bachey.
Valentine lost his mother early. The family did not live well, but the children studied at the gymnasium and even traveled abroad with their father, along the Mediterranean Sea. There was no strict supervision over them, and they managed to join the stormy and unique life of different parts of Odessa. The originality of this southern, multinational, Mediterranean Europe-oriented city, where the psychology of the inhabitants still retained features characteristic of the inhabitants of a free port, left a strong imprint on Kataev's work. Odessa jargon influenced the style of the writer. Valentin Kataev is the elder brother of the writer E. Petrov, who became a famous satirist, co-author of I. A. Ilf. Valentin published his first poem "Autumn" as a high school student in 1910 in the newspaper "Odessa Bulletin". He also published in Southern Thought, Odessa Leaflet, Awakening, Lukomorye, etc. He did not pay too much attention to the aesthetic and political direction of his works, sometimes publishing essays on the pages of warring newspapers. Speaking at poetry evenings, Kataev quickly became acquainted with famous Odessa writers and joined the Green Lamp group of young poets. The young man was patronized by the famous Russian poet and writer A. M. Fedorov,


At the gymnasium, Kataev had the nickname "Chinese", for his slightly slanted eyes. In 1915, without graduating from the gymnasium, at the age of 18 he went to the front as a volunteer. He began his service near Smorgon as a junior rank in an artillery battery, then was promoted to ensign. Twice he was wounded and gassed. In the summer of 1917, after being wounded in the "Keren" offensive on the Romanian front, he was placed in a hospital in Odessa. Kataev was awarded the rank of second lieutenant, but he did not have time to receive shoulder straps and was demobilized as an ensign. He was awarded two St. George's Crosses and the Order of St. Anna IV degree (better known in the Russian army under the name "Anna for Courage"). With a military rank and awards, he received a personal nobility that was not inherited. At the front, he wrote articles and essays about the "trench" life of soldiers, full of sympathy for the common man in the war (Letters from there, Our Weekdays, Ilya Muromets, and others). The protest against the war, which was growing in the mindset of the warring parties of those years, is expressed in the story at Night (1917), which was banned by the censors.

In 1918, after being treated in a hospital in Odessa, Kataev joined the armed forces of Hetman P. P. Skoropadsky. After the fall of the hetman in December 1918, when the Bolsheviks appeared north of Odessa, in March 1919 Kataev volunteered for the Volunteer Army of A. I. Denikin, automatically receiving the rank of second lieutenant. As an artilleryman, he was appointed commander of the first tower on the Novorossiya light armored train of the Armed Forces of the South of Russia (VSYUR). The armored train was attached to a detachment of volunteers by A. N. Rosenshield von Paulin and opposed the Petliurists, who declared war on the All-Union Socialist Republic on September 24, 1919. The fighting lasted the whole of October and ended with the occupation of Vapnyarka by the whites. The detachment advanced in the Kiev direction as part of the troops of the Novorossiysk region of the All-Union Socialist Republic of General N. N. Schilling. The actions of the troops of the Novorossiysk region of the Armed Forces of South Russia were part of Denikin's campaign against Moscow. The armored train "Novorossiya" fought on two fronts - against the Petliurists, who were entrenched in Vinnitsa, and against the Reds, who stood in Berdichev. At the very beginning of 1920, even before the retreat of the Whites, Kataev fell ill with typhus in Zhmerinka and was evacuated to an Odessa hospital. In early February 1920, his relatives took him home, still suffering from typhus. On February 7, 1920, Odessa was finally occupied by the Reds.

Already in mid-February 1920, Kataev was cured of typhus. At this time, he connects to the officer underground, which has developed a conspiracy to meet a possible Wrangel landing from the Crimea. (Similarly, with a simultaneous strike by an airborne detachment and an uprising of officer underground organizations, Odessa was liberated from the Reds in August 1919. The main task of the conspirators was to capture a lighthouse to support the landing. The Odessa Cheka knew about the conspiracy from the very beginning and the very "conspiracy idea" was planted provocateurs of the Cheka. In the Odessa Cheka, the conspiracy was called the "Wrangel plot at the lighthouse." One of the conspirators, Viktor Fedorov, a former officer of the All-Union Socialist Revolutionary Federation, who escaped persecution by the Reds and got a job as a junior officer in the searchlight team at the lighthouse, was associated with the lighthouse. was the son of the Russian writer A. M. Fedorov, who in turn was friends with the Kataev and Bunin families. The provocateur of the Cheka offered Viktor Fedorov a large sum of money for disabling the searchlight during the landing. Fedorov agreed to do it for free. The Cheka led the group for several weeks and then arrested its participants: Viktor Fedorov, his wife, his brother-in-law, projectors, Valentin Kataev and others. Together with Valentin Kataev, his younger brother Yevgeny, who had nothing to do with the conspiracy, was also arrested.

Grigory Kotovsky interceded for Viktor Fedorov before the chairman of the Odessa Cheka, Max Deutsch. Victor's father A. M. Fedorov in 1916 influenced the abolition of the death penalty by hanging against Kotovsky. It was Kotovsky who took Odessa in February 1920 and, thanks to this, had a great influence on what was happening at that time in the city. Viktor Fedorov and his wife Nadezhda, at the insistence of Kotovsky, were released by Deutsch.

And Valentin Kataev was saved by an even more fantastic accident. A security officer came from the Moscow Cheka to the Odessa Cheka with an inspection, whom Kataev later called in his memoirs as Yakov Belsky. In the summer of 1919, Belsky happened to be present during a conversation between Bunin and Kataev during the Bolshevik demonstrations then taking place in Odessa. Bunin, not knowing that even at that time Kataev was in the White Guard underground, reproached him in a conversation:

- “After all, if I’m talking to you after all that you have done, then it means that a good feeling for you overpowers me, because now I don’t bow to Carmen and I won’t bow ...”

For Belsky, just like the Odessa Chekists, who did not know about Kataev's voluntary service in the All-Union Socialist League, this was a sufficient reason to let Kataev go. In September 1920, after six months in an Odessa prison, Valentin Kataev and his brother left it. The rest of the conspirators were shot in the autumn of 1920.

[Not everyone knows about this vague episode in the life of Valentin Kataev. In some biographies of the writer, which are published, including on the Internet, this period of Kataev's life is described as follows:

"In 1919 he was mobilized into the Red Army, commanded an artillery battery on the Don Front." .... ]

After leaving prison, Valentin Kataev again began to write and collaborate with the YugROSTA association; attends various literary circles. He becomes close to E.G. Bagritsky, together with whom he composes propaganda texts for posters. In 1921, he worked in the Kharkov press together with Yuriy Olesha, edited the Kommunarka Ukrainy magazine and published in many other publications.

From 1922 he lived in Moscow; a regular contributor to the Gudok newspaper (since 1923), as a "topical" humorist, he collaborates and prints humoresques and feuilletons in Pravda, Rabochaya Gazeta, Trud (pseudonyms: Starik Sabbakin, Ol. Twist, Mitrofan Mustard). In the early work of Kataev, a peculiar fusion of realism, sharp worldly observation, irony, reaching sarcasm, romantic elation and daring fantasy manifested itself in stories about the Civil War (Krantz's Experience, 1919; Golden Pen, 1920; Notes on the Civil War, 1924, where there is a tendentious - a contrasting "black and white" image of what is happening, with an exalted description of the "red" heroes and a satirical depiction of the White Guards), as well as in adventurous utopian novels about the world revolution (Ehrendorf Island, The Lord of Iron, both 1924) and in the socio-critical phantasmagoria " small" genres (Sir Henry and the devil, 1920; Iron Ring, 1923).

At the same time, Kataev went from a mocking play on anecdotal incidents (collections of stories The Bearded Baby, 1924; The Most Funny, 1927) to the accusatory pathos of debunking the cult of profit and the “beautiful” life. The first significant success was brought to the writer by the story The Spoilers (1926; play of the same name, 1928), where the "archetypal" rogue characters of new Russian literature, from Gogol's Khlestakov and Chichikov to Ostap Bender I. Ilf and E. Petrov, travel in search of great luck (" happiness") and as a result they discover both the falsity of their own ideals and the squalor of the surrounding reality. The sharpness of social and psychological satire directed against philistine vulgarity and the petty-bourgeois cult of property is also marked by the stories of the 1920s by Ignatiy Pudelakin (1927), Child, Things (both 1929), and the comedy Squaring the Circle (1928). In the same years, Kataev also identified his other main themes: historical-revolutionary, combined with autobiographical (stories Father, 1925; Rodion Zhukov, 1926; Sea, 1928, etc., continued by the story A lonely sail turns white, 1936; film of the same name, 1937 , directed by V.G. Legoshin), and the theme of building a new life (the play Avangard, 1929, about the creation of collective farms; written after a trip to Magnitogorsk and strengthening the popularity of the writer, the chronicle novel Time, Forward!, 1931, full of dynamism, pathos of free labor and optimistic faith in the creative energy of the masses, consonant with the joyful marching tone of the then poems by V.V. Mayakovsky, who suggested the name of the work to Kataev).

The story A lonely sail turns white, the main characters of which are Odessa boys - high school student Petya Bachey, named after the maiden name of Kataev's mother, and the son of a fisherman Gavrik Chernoivanenko, find themselves in the whirlpool of the revolutionary events of 1905, along with adults (sailor from the Potemkin battleship Rodion Zhukov, father Petit - teacher Vasily Petrovich Bachey, a merchant from Odessa Privoz Madame Storozhenko, grandfather Gavrik, etc.) experiencing the seriousness of the ongoing processes and at the same time poeticizing the world around them with the sharpness of a fresh, romantic perception. A fascinating plot, picturesque objectivity of the description of the "background" of what is happening - the bustle of Odessa streets, the market, the port, the beach, the unceasing sea, gymnasium life, etc., the fusion of humor, lyricism and heroic pathos made this work one of the favorite children's books. The story was partly included in the tetralogy of the Waves of the Black Sea (story Khutorok in the steppe, 1956, film of the same name, 1971, dir. For the power of the Soviets, film of the same name, 1956, dir. Buneev).

The desire to show the history of the country through the fate of a person is also marked by the story of Kataev I, the son of the working people (1937), which takes place during the German occupation of Ukraine in 1919, the main characters are folklore characters - the brave soldier Semyon Kotko and the beautiful girl Sofya, the narrative unfolding in the style of folk tales, full of descriptions of Ukrainian landscapes, rituals and customs, the sounds of Ukrainian speech (an opera by S.S. Prokofiev, Semen Kotko, 1939, was created on the plot of the story).

During the Great Patriotic War, he participated in the battles on the Kursk Bulge, near Orel. War correspondent Kataev wrote feuilletons, essays, stories (Third Tank, Flag, Viaduct, Our Father, Wife story, 1943, plays Father's House, Blue Handkerchief). Huge popularity was brought to the writer by the story The Son of the Regiment (1945; Stalin Prize 2nd degree, 1946), a story about the fate of an orphan boy adopted by a combat regiment. The institution of "sons of the regiment" has since established itself in the Russian army; based on the story, a play of the same name was written, a film was made (1946, dir. V. M. Pronin). An accurate sense of modernity, authenticity of details, a witty plot, an alloy of lyricism and grotesque, like his other dramatic works, was distinguished by the play Day of Rest (1947).

After the war, Kataev was prone to days of heavy drinking. In 1946, Valentina Serova told Bunin that Kataev “sometimes drinks for 3 days. He doesn’t drink, doesn’t drink, and then, after finishing a story, an article, sometimes a chapter, he goes on a spree. In 1948, this almost led Kataev to divorce his wife.

In 1955 he founded the magazine "Youth" and, being the editor-in-chief of the magazine (1955-1962), Kataev contributed to its transformation into one of the leading periodicals in the country, the “mouthpiece” of the so-called. of the sixties, who opened the way to the reader for many prominent writers (including V.P. Aksenov and A.T. Gladilin). In 1964, the writer published an artistic and journalistic story about V.I. Lenin "The Little Iron Door in the Wall", in 1969 - the story "The Cup". A cycle of Kataev's memoirs (stories The Holy Well, 1965; Grass of Oblivion, 1967; Broken Life, or Oberon's Magic Horn, 1972; My Diamond Crown, 1975, titled with a line from the draft version of Boris Godunov A.S. Pushkin; Dry Liman, 1986, where, inspired by the poetic imagination of the author, the characters and plots of many of Kataev’s books came together), open up new facets of the writer’s talent: depth of penetration into the meaning of events and people’s characters, confession and observation, combined with a living ability to artistic displacement of time and space, to play with allegories , symbols and "masks" (for example, in the Diamond Crown, the real heroes of Kataev's memoirs, mainly well-known writers, are brought out under "iconic" nicknames, for example, Commander - V.V. Mayakovsky).
The story "The Wind Has Already Been Written" (1979), with the title - a line from Pasternak, referring to reflections on how little humanistic culture can change in the cruelty of a real historical process, polemically in relation to Kataev's previous historical and revolutionary works, shows the Civil War in Russia as meaningless fratricidal massacre, in which the hero of the story, the sincere and pure cadet Dima, is involved, and in which the commissars in black leather jackets carry out their bloody court, shooting their victims without trial or investigation in garages.

The romantic story of a soldier's love for a general's daughter, which has become almost archetypal in the literature of modern times, is described by Kataev in a sentimental novel in letters A youthful novel by my old friend Sasha Pchelkin (1982).

By the second marriage, Kataev was married to Esther Davydovna Kataeva (1913-2009). “It was an amazing marriage,” Daria Dontsova, a close friend of the Kataev family, said about him. There were two children in this marriage - Evgenia Valentinovna Kataeva (named after her grandmother, mother Valentin Kataev, b. 1936) and children's writer and memoirist Pavel Valentinovich Kataev (b. 1938).

Son-in-law of Kataev (husband of Evgenia Kataeva) - Jewish Soviet poet, editor and public figure Aron Vergelis (1918-1999).

Kataev's nephews (sons of Yevgeny Petrov) are cameraman Pyotr Kataev (1930-1986) and composer Ilya Kataev (1939-2009).

The granddaughter of Kataev (daughter of Evgenia Kataeva) is the journalist Tina (Valentina) Eduardovna Kataeva.

Kataev died in Moscow on April 12, 1986. He was buried in Moscow at the Novodevichy Cemetery (plot No. 10).

Valentin Petrovich Kataev was awarded two St. George's Crosses, the Order of St. Anna IV degree, the Stalin Prize of the second degree (1946) - for the story "Son of the Regiment" (1945), Hero of Socialist Labor (1974), three orders of Lenin, medals. Corresponding member of the Mainz Academy (1973, Germany), member of the Goncourt Academy (1976, Paris).

On the facade of the house number 4 on Bazarnaya Street in Odessa, where Valentin Kataev was born, there is a memorial plaque. One of the alleys in Odessa is named after Valentin Kataev. A separate museum exposition is dedicated to Kataev in the Odessa Museum.

An Odessa journalist, interviewed at the end of the writer's life in 1982, spoke of him as follows:

  • "... He had an indestructible Odessa accent."
The language of Odessa has largely become the literary language of Kataev, and Odessa itself has become not just a backdrop for many of the works of Valentin Kataev, but their full-fledged hero.

Creative heritage of Valentin Kataev:

The most important and most famous works

  • Tetralogy "Waves of the Black Sea".
    • The lonely sail turns white (1936)
    • Farm in the steppe (1956)
    • Winter Wind (1960)
    • For the power of the Soviets (Catacombs) (1949-1951)

Novels

  • Lord of Iron (1924)
  • Ehrendorf Island (1924)
  • The Wasters (1926)
  • Time forward! (1932)
  • I am the son of the working people (1937)
  • A Broken Life, or the Magic Horn of Oberon (1972)
  • Cemetery in Skuliany (1975)
  • Diamond My Crown (1977)

Tale

  • Rodion Zhukov (1928)
  • Electric Machine (1943)
  • Wife (1943)
  • Son of the Regiment (1945)
  • Trip South (1951)
  • Little iron door in the wall (1964)
  • Holy Well (1965)
  • Oblivion Grass (1967)
  • Cube (1969)
  • Already Written by Werther (1980)
  • A youthful novel by my friend Sasha Pchelkin. Written by Himself (1980)
  • Sleeper (1984)
  • Dry Estuary (1985)

Storybooks

  • In a besieged city (1923)
  • Sir Henry and the Devil (1923)
  • Eduard the Loafer (1925)
  • Bearded Baby (1926)
  • New Stories (1926)
  • Stories (1926)
  • The Funniest (1927)
  • Solyanka team (1927)
  • Father (1928)
  • Birds of God (1928)

Some individual stories

  • Child (1929)
  • In the margins of a novel (1931)
  • Sonya Buzuluk (1933)
  • Two Hussars (1934)
  • At Night (1934)
  • Gases (1935)
  • Namesake (1935)
  • Paradox (1935)
  • Death of Starodubtsev (1935)
  • Sleep (1935)
  • Surprise (1935)
  • Theater (1935)
  • Meeting (1935)
  • Black bread (1935)
  • Flowers (1936)
  • Shadows (1937)
  • Under Smorgon (1939)
  • Semi-Flower (1940)
  • Pipe and pitcher (1940)
  • Two Castles (1940)
  • In passing (194)
  • At the dacha (1941)
  • Deciphered summary (1942)
  • Third tank (1942)
  • Partisan (1942)
  • Lieutenant (1942)
  • Photographic card (1942)
  • Flag (1942)
  • 1918 (1943)
  • Operational Zagrebukhin (1945)
  • Pearl (1945)
  • Stump (1945)
  • Our Father (1946)
  • Viaduct (1946)
  • New Year's story (1947)
  • Baby Soul (1947)
  • Happy New Year!.. (1947)
  • Last Night (1948)
  • Cursed Wind (1949)
  • Dove (1949)
  • Port (1951)
  • Eternal Memory (1954)
  • Remembrance (1961)
  • Dear Sweet Grandpa (1965)
  • Sorrento (1966)
  • Monkey (1970)
  • Violet (1973)
  • Demyan Tells (1977)

Poems

  • Autumn (1910)

Non-genre works

  • Dry Estuary (1986)

Kataev's works in theater, film and television

Drama Theater

  • 1927 - "Squanderers" - Moscow Art Theater, staged by K. S. Stanislavsky.
  • 1928 - "Quadrature of the Circle" - Moscow Art Theatre, staged by N. M. Gorchakov under the direction of V. I. Nemirovich-Danchenko. The play is still staged in theaters in Russia, Europe and America.
  • 1934 - "Road of Flowers" - Moscow Modern Theater

1940 - "House" - Comedy Theater, staged by N. P. Akimov. The play was banned; in 1972 (?) restored by director A. A. Belinsky.

  • 1940 - “A soldier was walking from the front” - Vakhtangov Theater.
  • 1942 - "Blue handkerchief" - theater (?).
  • 1948 - "Crazy Day" ("Where are you, Monsieur Miussov?") - Moscow Academic Theater of Satire.
  • 1954 (?) - “It was in Konsk” (“House”) - Moscow Academic Theater of Satire.
  • 1958 (?) - "It's time for love" - ​​the theater of the Moscow City Council.

Opera theatre

  • 1940, June 23 - "Semyon Kotko" (1939), opera by S. S. Prokofiev in 5 acts, 7 scenes based on the story by V. P. Kataev "I, the son of the working people ...". Libretto by V.P. Kataev and S.S. Prokofiev. Moscow Academic Musical Theater named after K.S. Stanislavsky and Vl. I. Nemirovich-Danchenko under control. M. Zhukova.
  • 1970s - "Semyon Kotko" (1939), opera by S. S. Prokofiev in 5 acts, 7 scenes based on the story by V. P. Kataev "I, the son of the working people ...". Libretto by V.P. Kataev and S.S. Prokofiev. Bolshoi Theatre, director B. A. Pokrovsky, conductor F. Sh. Mansurov

Filmography: scripts

  • Circus (Scriptwriter with Ilya Ilf and Yevgeny Petrov; all three removed their names from the credits of the film due to changes made to the script) (1936)
  • The Motherland Calls (together with A. Macheret) (1936)
  • Pages of Life (together with A. Macheret) (1948)
  • The lonely sail turns white (1937)
  • Son of the Regiment (1946)
  • For the power of the Soviets (together with S. Klebanov) (1956)
  • Crazy Day (1956)
  • Poet (1957)

-) - Russian historian; father of writer Ivan Kataev, paternal uncle of mathematician A. N. Kolmogorov.

Biography

Son of a village priest. He graduated from the Vyatka Theological Seminary, then the Faculty of History and Philology of Moscow University ().

Then he worked in the Middle Volga (- gg.), Kuibyshev (- gg.) Pedagogical Institutes.

He headed the history department of the Magnitogorsk Pedagogical Institute (August - April), was the dean of the history department of the Moscow State Pedagogical University.

Scientific works of I. M. Kataev

Author of works on archeography, the history of Moscow, archival science, methods of teaching history.

Studies on the history of Moscow

  • "Tushino" (M., 1913);
  • "Fire of Moscow in 1812" (M., 1912);
  • "Moscow in the 18th century" (M., 1915)

Essays on Russian history

  • "Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich and his time";
  • "Daniil Romanovich Galitsky";
  • "Bohdan Khmelnytsky";
  • "Emperor Alexander I" (1901-1914).

Other works of Kataev

  • "Description of the acts of the meeting of Count A. S. Uvarov" (M., 1905),
  • "Review of handwritten monuments on the history of Sloboda Ukraine, stored in the military-scientific archive of the General Staff in St. Petersburg" (Kharkov, 1902),
  • "Description of documents of the Moscow archive of the Ministry of Justice" (M., 1905-1917, vols. XVI-XX),
  • "Archives of the Kuibyshev Territory" (Kuibyshev, 193 6y.))

Bibliography

  • Autobiography of Professor I. M. Kataev // Archival Department of the Administration of Magnitogorsk (AOAM), f. 132, op. 3.
  • Vendrovskaya R. B. School reform in 1915-1916. and teaching history // Teaching history in school. - 1995. - No. 4. - S.22-26.
  • Kataev I. M. The latest trends in teaching history in middle and senior classes of secondary school // Vopr. history teaching in middle and elementary schools. - M., 1917. - Sat.2.
  • Kataev I. M. The latest trends in teaching history in middle and senior classes of secondary school // Teaching history at school. - 1996. - No. 8. - P.4-6.
  • Kataev I. M. Textbook of Russian history for secondary school. - SL. - 132 e.; 4.2. - 262 e.; Ch. Z. - 262 p. - M.: Sytin Publishing House, 1917.
  • Enlightenment in the Urals. - 1928. - No. 11. - P.14.
  • Kataev I. M. Questions of teaching social science: Method. essays. - M., 1926.
  • Kataev I.M. New Marxist methodology of history // Social science in labor school. - 1929. - No. 3-4.
  • Semenov VV 25th anniversary of the Magnitogorsk Pedagogical Institute MGPI. - Magnitogorsk, 1957. - Issue 5. - p.7.
  • Kataev I.M. Usolskaya estate on the eve of the peasant reform of 1861 // Uchenye zap. MGPI. - Magnitogorsk, 1949. - Issue 2. - P.5-59.

Write a review on the article "Kataev, Ivan Matveevich"

Notes

Links

An excerpt characterizing Kataev, Ivan Matveevich

- And it can not be otherwise? she asked. Prince Andrei did not answer, but his face expressed the impossibility of changing this decision.
- It's horrible! No, it's terrible, terrible! Natasha suddenly spoke up and sobbed again. “I’ll die waiting for a year: it’s impossible, it’s terrible. - She looked into the face of her fiancé and saw on him an expression of compassion and bewilderment.
“No, no, I’ll do everything,” she said, suddenly stopping her tears, “I’m so happy!” The father and mother entered the room and blessed the bride and groom.
From that day on, Prince Andrei began to go to the Rostovs as a groom.

There was no betrothal, and no one was announced about Bolkonsky's engagement to Natasha; Prince Andrew insisted on this. He said that since he was the cause of the delay, he must bear the full burden of it. He said that he had forever bound himself with his word, but that he did not want to bind Natasha and gave her complete freedom. If in six months she feels that she does not love him, she will be in her own right if she refuses him. It goes without saying that neither the parents nor Natasha wanted to hear about it; but Prince Andrei insisted on his own. Prince Andrei visited the Rostovs every day, but not like a groom treated Natasha: he told her you and only kissed her hand. Between Prince Andrei and Natasha, after the day of the proposal, completely different than before, close, simple relations were established. They didn't seem to know each other until now. Both he and she loved to remember how they looked at each other when they were still nothing, now they both felt like completely different beings: then pretended, now simple and sincere. At first, the family felt awkward in dealing with Prince Andrei; he seemed like a man from an alien world, and Natasha for a long time accustomed her family to Prince Andrei and proudly assured everyone that he only seemed so special, and that he was the same as everyone else, and that she was not afraid of him and that no one should be afraid his. After a few days, the family got used to him and did not hesitate to lead the old way of life with him, in which he took part. He knew how to talk about housekeeping with the count, and about outfits with the countess and Natasha, and about albums and canvases with Sonya. Sometimes the family Rostovs among themselves and under Prince Andrei were surprised at how all this happened and how obvious the omens of this were: both the arrival of Prince Andrei in Otradnoye, and their arrival in Petersburg, and the similarity between Natasha and Prince Andrei, which the nanny noticed on the first visit Prince Andrei, and the clash in 1805 between Andrei and Nikolai, and many other omens of what happened, were noticed at home.
The house was dominated by that poetic boredom and silence that always accompanies the presence of the bride and groom. Often sitting together, everyone was silent. Sometimes they got up and left, and the bride and groom, remaining alone, were also silent. Rarely did they talk about their future lives. Prince Andrei was scared and ashamed to talk about it. Natasha shared this feeling, like all his feelings, which she constantly guessed. Once Natasha began to ask about his son. Prince Andrei blushed, which often happened to him now and that Natasha especially loved, and said that his son would not live with them.
- From what? Natasha said scared.
“I can’t take him away from my grandfather and then…”
How I would love him! - said Natasha, immediately guessing his thought; but I know you want no pretexts to accuse you and me.
The old count sometimes approached Prince Andrei, kissed him, asked him for advice on the upbringing of Petya or the service of Nikolai. The old countess sighed as she looked at them. Sonya was afraid at any moment to be superfluous and tried to find excuses to leave them alone when they did not need it. When Prince Andrei spoke (he spoke very well), Natasha listened to him with pride; when she spoke, she noticed with fear and joy that he was looking at her attentively and searchingly. She asked herself in bewilderment: “What is he looking for in me? What is he trying to achieve with his eyes? What, if not in me what he is looking for with this look? Sometimes she entered into her insanely cheerful mood, and then she especially liked to listen and watch how Prince Andrei laughed. He rarely laughed, but when he did, he gave himself over to his laughter, and every time after that laughter she felt closer to him. Natasha would have been perfectly happy if the thought of the forthcoming and approaching parting had not frightened her, since he, too, turned pale and cold at the mere thought of it.
On the eve of his departure from Petersburg, Prince Andrei brought with him Pierre, who had never been to the Rostovs since the ball. Pierre seemed confused and embarrassed. He was talking to his mother. Natasha sat down with Sonya at the chess table, thus inviting Prince Andrei to her. He approached them.
"You've known the Earless for a long time, haven't you?" - he asked. - Do you love him?
- Yes, he is nice, but very funny.
And she, as always talking about Pierre, began to tell jokes about his absent-mindedness, jokes that they even made up about him.
“You know, I confided our secret to him,” said Prince Andrei. “I have known him since childhood. This is a heart of gold. I beg you, Natalie,” he said suddenly seriously; I'm leaving, God knows what might happen. You can spill... Well, I know I shouldn't talk about it. One thing - whatever happens to you when I'm gone...
– What will happen?…
“Whatever the grief,” continued Prince Andrei, “I ask you, m lle Sophie, no matter what happens, turn to him alone for advice and help. This is the most absent-minded and funny person, but the most golden heart.



Similar articles