Vasil Bykov is one of the most prominent Russian writers who, over the course of many years of creative work, remained faithful to the theme of war. He writes only about the war, not knowing fatigue and as if afraid not to have time to tell the reader how devastatingly the war affected the souls of people.
Vasil Bykov, like Yuri Bondarev, Georgy Baklanov, is one of the front-line writers who knew firsthand what the front and the front line are. Bykov fought until the end of the war on the Southwestern Front. And, in fact, he did not have to invent anything about her in his books. He bore all the hardships of the war on his own shoulders. It was an experience, passionately and deeply experienced.
“I can’t get rid of the thought,” Ch. Aitmatov wrote, “that fate saved Vasil Bykov for us, so that, having gone through the crucible of war, having fully suffered the bitter hard times of partisan Belarus, he would say in post-war literature his innermost, unique, full of merciless truth and filial pain, a word on behalf of all those then eighteen-year-olds who, perhaps, had the most difficult - a tragic and heroic fate.
Bykov wrote about the war as it was - in suffering and blood. He wrote about people who, under the conditions of this war, behaved differently, showing both cowardice and heroism. Perhaps it is in this aspect that Bykov is most interesting to us. It is interesting in that it shows the logic of human behavior in an extreme situation, exposes its inner spiritual confrontation. This allows the writer to deeply understand the people's, human truth about the war.
In early military prose ("Front Page", "Trap", "Crane Cry", "Third Rocket") Bykov is far from textbook gloss in showing military events, far from showing false heroism, false feelings. His heroes amaze with the truth of their characters, the reliability of relationships. They believe that they are not dying in vain, that the enemy will still be stopped. Sergeant-major Karpenko, scientist Fisher, Vanka Svist perish with weapons in their hands, holding the defense at the crossing ("Crane cry"). Seriously wounded Ivan Shcherbak commits suicide. to enable his comrade to escape from the Nazis ("Front page"). Without letting the tanks through, the "forty-caps" of Senior Lieutenant Zheltykh ("Third Rocket") are dying. Some, however, do not stand up, under the pressure of circumstances become cowards and traitors. Such are Ivan Pshenichny in the Front Page, Zadorozhny in The Third Rocket. Rybak in Sotnikov. These figures were taken by Bykov not by chance. The author wants to emphasize that cowardice inevitably entails hypocrisy, self-deception, and duality. A man deprived of courage loses not only his own dignity, but also the respect of others.
The problem of human responsibility - that's what excites Bykov already in early prose. Getting into a situation of choice, his hero shows his spiritual. human truth. People of strong character, capable of self-sacrifice - Karpenko and Svist in "The Crane Cry", Kri-Venok and Popov in "The Third Rocket", Klimchenko in "The Trap". You can always rely on these people: they will not let you down. They steadfastly and courageously endure all the hardships of the war, its inhuman trials, and at the same time remain ordinary people with natural, simple dreams of the end of the war, of health, of life. “They,” writes Bykov, the author of the “Front Page”, “they wanted only one thing - to live to the end of the war. If only they could defeat fascism, wait for victory, see at least one peaceful day without fire and blood, and, it seems, nothing more They would have agreed to any job, to the most modest place in life, they would have the desired peace everywhere after the hell that they experienced at the front. "
With his first military stories, Bykov drew attention to the fact that not every person is capable of heroism, but everyone must and can be responsible for their actions. Perhaps it is the consciousness of responsibility that guides Fischer's actions: not prepared for war, he warns his comrades about the appearance of the Germans at the cost of his own life. The same feeling makes Timoshkin stubbornly go to his own, no matter what: "... despair and anger squeezed his throat when he remembered Skvaryshev, Keklidze, Shcherbak and many other nice guys that, covered with snow, forever remained in the wide expanses of the Hungarian plains. Through his tears, he saw nothing around, except for a distant fire, which quietly flickered on someone's timeless iron grave. The fire led him in the darkness of the night - from death to life, there, to his own. "
It is the desire to establish justice at all costs that makes the hero believe, fight and not get tired of living. After all, only then can a person show great strength of mind when he sets high goals for himself, even if by doing so he dooms himself to death. Ultimately, success and victory over oneself come to a person only in the struggle. This happens to the hero of the story "The Death of a Man", who, being seriously wounded, painfully overcomes every meter of the way, deciding on a selfless act,
It seems that those examples that Bykov talks about reveal a huge spiritual potential hidden in a person. It is no coincidence that the Nazis wrote about the fanaticism of the Soviet people, whose inner world was simply inaccessible to their understanding.
Once again, I would like to emphasize that in describing a person in war, the writer avoids a one-sided image: after all, a person is constantly changing, showing one or another quality. All the heroes of Bykov's stories, very different in character, age, temperament, are united by one thing: a sense of honor, the consciousness that they are fulfilling their military duty, the ability to take responsibility in the most difficult life situations. The most important feat of these people is a victory over oneself, over one's fatigue and pain, which is the most important guarantee of a person's spiritual strength.
Didn't like the essay?
We have 8 more similar compositions.
Many books have been written about the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. K. Simonov, B. Vasiliev, V. Bykov, V. Astafiev, V. Rasputin, Y. Bondarev and many others addressed the topic of “man at war”. At the same time, it is impossible not to mention that this topic was also touched upon before them, because there were many wars in the history of Russia, and all of them were reflected in literary works. The war of 1812 - in the novel by L. N. Tolstoy "War and Peace", the First World War and the Civil War - in the novel by M. Sholokhov "Quiet Don". These two authors are characterized by a peculiar approach to the theme of "man in war". Tolstoy considers mainly the psychological side of the phenomenon, both from the point of view of the Russian soldier and from the side of the enemy. Sholokhov, on the other hand, gives an image of the civil war through the eyes of the White Guards, that is, in fact, enemies.
But usually the theme “man at war” means precisely the Great Patriotic War. One of the first works about the Second World War that comes to mind is the poem "Vasily Terkin" by A. T. Tvardovsky. The hero of the poem is a simple Russian soldier. His image is the embodiment of all soldiers, all their qualities and character traits. The poem is a series of sketches: Terkin in battle, Terkin in hand-to-hand combat with a German soldier, Terkin in the hospital, Terkin on vacation. All this adds up to a single picture of front-line life. Terkin, being a "simple guy", nevertheless, performs feats, but not for the sake of glory and honors, but for the sake of fulfilling his duty. Endowing Terkin with many endearing features of the Russian national character, Tvardovsky emphasizes that this man is only a reflection of the people. Not Terkin performs feats, but the whole people.
If Tvardovsky unfolds before us a broad picture of the war, then Yuri Bondarev, for example, in his stories (“Battalions ask for fire”, “Last salvos”) is limited to describing one battle and a very short period of time. At the same time, the battle itself does not have much significance - this is just one of the innumerable battles for the next settlement. The same Tvardovsky said about this:
Let that fight not be mentionedGold on the glory list.
The day will come - still will rise
People in living memory.
It doesn't matter if the fight is local or general. It is important how a person will show himself in it. Yuri Bondarev writes about this. His heroes are young people, almost boys, who got to the front straight from the school bench or from the student audience. But war makes a person more mature, immediately ages him. Recall Dmitry Novikov - the main character of the story "The Last Volleys". After all, he is very young, so young that he himself is embarrassed by this, and many envy him that at such a young age he achieved such military successes. Indeed, it is unnatural to be so young and have such powers: to control not only actions, but also the fate of people, their life and death.
Bondarev himself said that a person in war finds himself in an unnatural position, since war itself is an unnatural way of resolving conflicts. But, nevertheless, being placed in such conditions, Bondarev's heroes show the best human qualities: nobility, courage, determination, honesty, steadfastness. Therefore, we feel pity when the hero of The Last Volleys, Novikov, dies, having just found love, having felt life. But the writer just tries to affirm the idea that victory is paid for by such sacrifices. A lot of people put their lives on the fact that the Victory Day still came.
And there are writers who have a completely different approach to the topic of war. For example, Valentin Rasputin. In the story "Live and Remember" it is the war that drives the development of the plot. But it seems to pass by, only indirectly influencing the fate of the heroes. In the story "Live and Remember" we will not find descriptions of battles, like those of Tvardovsky or Bondarev. Here another theme is touched upon - the theme of betrayal. Indeed, deserters existed in the Great Patriotic War, as in any other, and we cannot close our eyes to this. Andrei Guskov arbitrarily leaves the front, thereby forever separating himself from the people, because he betrayed his people, his homeland. Yes, he remains to live, but his life has been bought at too high a price: he will never again be able to openly, with his head held high, enter the house of his parents. He cut off this path for himself. Moreover, he cut it off for his wife Nastena. She cannot enjoy Victory Day with other residents of Atamanovka, because her husband is not a hero, not an honest soldier, but a deserter. This is what gnaws at Iasten and tells her the last way out - to rush to the Angara.
A woman in war is even more unnatural than a man. A woman should be a mother, a wife, but not a soldier. But, unfortunately, many women in the Great Patriotic War had to wear military uniforms and go into battle on a par with men. This is stated in Boris Vasiliev's story “The Dawns Here Are Quiet...” Five girls who would have to study at the institute, flirt, nurse children, find themselves face to face with the enemy. All five die, and all five are heroic, but, nevertheless, what they did all together is a feat. They died, putting their young lives in order to bring victory just a little closer. Should there be a woman in the war? Probably yes, because if a woman feels that she is obliged to protect her home from the enemy on an equal basis with men, then it would be wrong to interfere with her. Such sacrifices are cruel but necessary. In the end, not only a woman in war is an unnatural phenomenon. In general, a person in war is unnatural.
(According to one of the works of modern literature.)
The Great Patriotic War was the most difficult of the wars that our people had to endure in their centuries-old history. The war was the greatest test and test of the strength of the people, and our people passed this test with honor. The war was also a most serious test for all Soviet literature, which during the days of the war showed the whole world that it does not and cannot have interests higher than the interests of the people.
Remarkable works were written by M. Sholokhov, A. Fadeev, A. Tolstoy, K. Simonov, A. Tvardovsky and many other writers.
A special place among the works of the period of the Great Patriotic War is occupied by M. Sholokhov's story "The Science of Hatred", published in June 1942.
In this story, the author shows how the feeling of love for the Motherland and the people matures and grows stronger in Soviet people, how contempt and hatred for the enemy ripens. The writer creates a typical image of a participant in the war - Lieutenant Gerasimov, in which he embodies the best features of the warring Soviet people.
Sholokhov, in his previous works, painted amazing pictures of Russian nature, which he never had as a background for action, but always helped to reveal deeper and more fully the human character, the psychological experiences of the characters.
The story begins with a description of nature. Already with the first phrase, Sholokhov brings man closer to nature and, as it were, emphasizes that she did not remain indifferent to the hard struggle that began: “In war, trees, like people, each have their own destiny.” In this story, the image of an oak crippled by a shell, which, despite the gaping wound, continues to live, has a symbolic meaning: “The torn, gaping hole withered half of the tree, but the other half, bent by a gap to the water, miraculously came to life in the spring and covered with fresh foliage. And to this day, probably, the lower branches of the crippled oak are bathed in flowing water, and the upper ones are still greedily attracting juicy tight leaves to the sun ... "The oak, broken by a shell, but retaining its vital juices, makes it possible to better reveal and understand the character of the main character of the lieutenant's story Gerasimov.
Already the first acquaintance of readers with the hero allows us to conclude that this is a courageous person with great willpower, who has endured a lot and changed his mind.
Viktor Gerasimov is a hereditary worker. Before the war, he worked at one of the factories in Western Siberia. He was drafted into the army in the first months of the war. The whole family tasks him with fighting enemies until victory.
From the very beginning of the war, the working man Gerasimov was seized by a feeling of hatred for the enemy, who destroyed the peaceful life of the people and plunged the country into the abyss of a bloody war.
At first, the Red Army soldiers treated the captured Germans kindly, called them "comrades", treated them to cigarettes, fed them from their bowlers. Then Sholokhov shows how our fighters and commanders went through a kind of school of hatred during the war with the Nazis.
Terrible traces of fascist rule were found by our troops, who drove the Nazis out of the temporarily occupied territory. It is impossible to read the descriptions of the monstrous atrocities of the enemies without shudder: “... Villages burned to the ground, hundreds of women, children, old people shot to the ground, mutilated corpses of captured Red Army soldiers, raped and brutally murdered women, girls and teenage girls ...” These atrocities shocked the fighters who understood that fascists are not people, but fanatics who have become rabid from blood.
Heavy, inhuman trials fell to the lot of Lieutenant Gerasimov, who was taken prisoner. Describing the behavior of the hero in captivity, the writer reveals new character traits inherent in the Russian people. Wounded, having lost a lot of blood, Gerasimov retains his dignity and is full of contempt and hatred for the enemy.
One desire possesses the lieutenant - not to die. In the column of prisoners, barely moving his legs, he thinks about escaping. Great joy covers Gerasimov and makes him forget about thirst and physical suffering when the Nazis do not find his party card, this gives him courage and stamina in the most difficult days of captivity.
The story depicts a camp in which the Germans kept prisoners, where “they were subjected to the most severe torments, where there was no latrine and people defecate here and stood and lay in the mud and in an ominous slush. The weakest did not get up at all. Water and food were provided once a day. Some day they completely forgot to give something ... ”But no atrocities, writes Sholokhov, could break the mighty spirit in the Russian man, extinguish the stubborn thirst for revenge.
The lieutenant endured a lot, many times he looked death in the eyes, and death itself, defeated by the courage of this man, receded. “The Nazis could kill us, unarmed and exhausted from hunger, they could torture us, but they could not break our spirit, and they never will!” This stubbornness of the Russian people and indestructible courage helped Gerasimov to escape from captivity. The lieutenant was picked up by the partisans. For two weeks he recovered his strength, participated with them in military operations.
Then he was transferred to the rear, to the hospital. After treatment, he soon goes back to the front.
“The Science of Hatred” ends with Gerasimov’s words about hatred and love: “... And they learned to fight for real, and hate, and love. On such a touchstone as war, all feelings are perfectly honed ... I hate the Germans heavily for everything they have done to my Motherland and me personally, and at the same time I love my people with all my heart and do not want them to have to suffer under the German yoke. This is what makes me, and all of us, fight with such ferocity, it is these two feelings, embodied in action, that will lead to victory for us.
The image of Lieutenant Gerasimov is one of the first generalizing images in the literature of the period of the Great Patriotic War.
The peculiarity of his character lies in the fact that he always feels like the son of the people, the son of the Motherland. It is this feeling of belonging to the great army of the Russian people, the feeling of selfless love for their Motherland and responsibility for its fate that give Gerasimov the strength not only to endure all the horrors of captivity, but also to flee in order to rejoin the ranks of the avengers for all the atrocities that the Nazis brought to our country. .
And quite convincingly given in the story is a comparison of the lieutenant's fate with the fate of a mighty oak, crippled by a shell, but retaining strength and the will to live. And how majestically beautiful is the image of a Russian person who has gone through the hard trials that have fallen to his lot, and who has retained an inexhaustible faith in victory and the desire to continue the war until the victorious defeat of fascism!
Bibliography
For the preparation of this work, materials from the site http://www.coolsoch.ru/ were used.
(According to the works of Russian literature of the XX century)
Bright and lively pages about the war were created by K. Simonov, B. Polevoy, Yu. Bondarev, V. Grossman and many other writers.
But among them there are authors who described not so much the war itself as analyzed the behavior of a person in it, penetrating deeply into the mechanism of his actions. They wanted to understand why the most ordinary person, once in extreme conditions, can scorn the danger and step into immortality. What motivated these people to act? This is what I want to think about.
Analyzing the story of Fyodor Tendryakov "The day that supplanted life ...". I liked him because the war is shown without embellishment, truthfully.
"The day that supplanted life ..." - the first day of yesterday's schoolboy in the war.
Only one day is described, but it replaced with itself the whole previous life, where school, exams, a fire by the river and many happy days remained. That's why the story is called that.
Ahead - the unknown, perhaps death. The Tenkov hero has seen films about the war, but his impressions of it do not match what he sees. Around burned tanks, craters from mines and shells, the ground, mutilated by tank tracks
And dead German soldiers.
But these soldiers do not cause hatred and malice, but only "embarrassing pity"; “I stood above the enemy and experienced only disgust ... But disgust is not in my soul, my bodily insides are disdainful, and an uninvited embarrassing pity seeps into my soul.” Sergeant Tenkov remembers his father killed in the war, but even after that, hatred does not boil in him.
I would like to believe that this pity will remain in the hero, although the war will change him too. It changes everything: people, their destinies, characters, life. No one knows how a person will behave in an emergency situation. This is clearly seen in the images of Sashka Glukharev and Ninkin.
Sashka, who seemed brave and courageous, turned out to be a coward, and Ninkin, who was inconspicuous and inconspicuous in life, did his duty and died like a hero. But the price of his life is not a hundred Germans, but only a bayonet shovel.
This first death was remembered for a long time by the protagonist of the story. He remembers her even after the war, although over the years he has seen many deaths, even more heroic than this. Achievement is self-sacrifice. But a person does not always realize that he is doing a great deed - he simply cannot do otherwise, this act seems to him natural and the only true one.
Everyone can accomplish a feat, but not everyone finds the strength to overcome fear, just as Glukharev could not. War changes the psyche and moral principles of people. At some point in the battle, the old values suddenly become insignificant. At this moment of change, a person is capable of anything. His life fades into the background, and something more arises in its place - the fate of the rest. That's when the feat takes place. This is exactly what happens to Ninkin.
Tendryakov was able to show how war affects people in different ways, this is the main pathos of his story. It affects a person's attitude to life, because it is unnatural for him, invades his destiny and breaks it.
"War is an event contrary to human reason and all human nature." These words belong to Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoy. Written about another war - 1812. And although it was also liberating and fair for the Russian people, the weapons in it were less terrible. But she is just as inhuman and cruel.
The feat of a man is also in the center of attention of another writer who has passed the front roads - Konstantin Vorobyov. The main idea of his story “Killed near Moscow” is insight from spiritual blindness, overcoming the fear of death.
The writer now and then stops to fix our attention either on a consonant, valiant step, almost like on a parade of a marching company, or he snatches one or two cheerful faces from a faceless multitude, lets us hear someone's sonorous boyish voice. And immediately the company itself - an abstract army unit - becomes for us a living organism, a full-fledged and full-blooded protagonist of the story. The gaze then stops at the main character - Alexei Yastrebov, who carries in himself "some kind of irrepressible, lurking happiness: the joy of this fragile morning, that the captain did not find him and that he still had to go and go on a clean crust."
This feeling of joy that overwhelms the characters is increasingly strengthening the contrast that opens up already on the first pages, sharply denoting two poles - overflowing life and inevitable - in just a few days - death. After all, we know what awaits them there, ahead, where they are going so cheerfully now. We know right away, by one name, already beginning with the terrible in its inevitability of the certainty of the word - "killed." The contrast becomes even sharper, and the feeling of impending tragedy reaches a tangible density when we are confronted with the discouraging naivety of the cadets. It turns out that they are, in essence, still boys who put on military uniforms and were thrown to the front by the inexorable law of wartime ...
The German tanks crushed the company, which fought bravely, although it could not do anything against them with its bottles and self-loading rifles. But the tanks were delayed, albeit at a terrible cost.
The first fight, which Alexei Yastrebov dreamed of as a victory to the cries of "Hurrah!", proceeds in a completely different way. The platoon does not shout “Hurrah!”, but “yells” “wordlessly and terribly”, and this cry then turns into a howl, because you can’t understand anything around, feelings are aggravated, and you want to merge with everyone at least in a cry, to feel like a part of everyone .
The boy lieutenant becomes a man by the end of the story. It is he who knocks out the tank and goes into the forest with a captured machine gun in order to stumble upon those scattered among his own.
“He almost physically felt,” writes K. Vorobyov about Alexei Yastrebov, “how the shadow of fear of his own death melted away in him. Now she stood in front of him, like a distant and indifferent beggar relative to him, but his childhood stood next to her and closer to him ... "After what he experienced in the night battle, after the death of Captain Ryumin, who died in his arms, after everything that happened to his company, he almost doesn't care - and he rises to meet the tank. The scene was written by Konstantin Vorobyov with soul-rending clarity and tension.
Yes, the Russian people accomplished a feat. They died, but did not give up. The consciousness of one's duty to the Motherland drowned out the feeling of fear, pain, and thoughts of death. This means that this action is not an unaccountable feat, but a conviction in the rightness and greatness of a cause for which a person consciously gives his life. The warriors understood that they shed their blood, gave their lives in the name of the triumph of justice and for the sake of life on earth. Our soldiers knew that this evil, this cruelty, this ferocious gang of murderers and rapists had to be defeated, otherwise they would enslave the whole world.
The prose of K. Vorobyov is accurate, cruel both in detail and in general. He does not want to hide anything, to miss. The main advantage of his works is that the romantic veil has been torn off the war. K. Vorobyov knew: if you write, then only the truth. The untruth turns into a lie, into a desecration of the memory of the dead ...
On May 9, former German soldiers who fought near Stalingrad laid wreaths on Mamaev Kurgan to the dead Russian soldiers as a sign of reconciliation and repentance. This gives hope that the world will change and there will be no place for war in it, but the memory of the feat will remain, because it was not without reason that thousands of people did not spare themselves, gave their lives for a just cause. Therefore, with great attention you read the lines from the letter of Maselbek, the hero of Ch. Aitmatov's story "Mother's Field": "We did not beg for a war, and we did not start it, this is a huge misfortune for all of us, all people. And we must shed our blood, give our lives to destroy this monster. If we do not do this, then we will not be worthy of the name of Man. An hour later I'm going to do the task of the Motherland. It is unlikely that I will return alive. I am going there to save the lives of many of my comrades in the offensive. I am going for the sake of the people, for the sake of victory, for the sake of everything beautiful that is in Man.
Works about the war reveal to us not only its cruel ruthlessness, but also the strength of heroism, courage, selflessness
our soldiers. They knew for sure what they were going to die for: they defended their homeland! And this is the feat.
Literature lesson in 5th grade.
Pedagogical workshop.
Teacher of Russian language and literature
MBOU secondary school No. 8, Tommot
Sergeenko Ludmila Vyacheslavovna
TOPIC: Yakutia is my small Motherland.
PURPOSE: to teach children the elements of creative work, to develop the ability to think independently, work with models, drawings, text. The development of associative thinking of the student.
Education of love for the native land and respect for everything that surrounds us.
During the classes:
1. Self-regulation. (conducted by the teacher)
Sit comfortably, close your eyes. Remember that today you are not in a lesson, but in a creative workshop. I am your master, and you are not just apprentices, but creators. Relax. Set yourself up for success, active work. Mentally repeat after me: “All my muscles relaxed, I calmed down, I try to understand and comprehend as best as possible what will be discussed. I can now easily put my thoughts into words. I become an interesting person. Everyone loves to listen to me."
2. Inductor (motivation of creative activity of the student)
Let's remember the song "Where the Motherland Begins"
We live in Yakutia. Yakutia is our small homeland.
Say the word RODINA slowly. What do you see when you say this word? Paint this picture with words.
3. Compilation of learning associative series.
At the word homeland, I see: endless expanses, flowers near the house, the Aldan River, my friends.
(the teacher writes on the blackboard, and the guys on their sheets of paper)
4. Dictionary set.
- Draw the globe. Get a circle. The circle is a symbol of eternity, a symbol of eternal life.
Divide it in half horizontally. In the upper half, write down warm (pleasant) words associated with the word "motherland".
In the bottom half, write down cold (unpleasant) words for that word.
5. Socialization and enrichment.
Read the kind words in a chain, add those that you do not have.
You feel how warm these words are, they exude warmth, light, kindness, eternity.
Cold words will not be read.
6.Memory.
Now remember your photo album. There will definitely be a photo that you like the most, taken against the backdrop of nature. Remember under what circumstances and when this photo was taken. Write down in separate words your feelings, sensations at this moment. How did nature influence your state and mood?
7. Read aloud and complete your lists.
8. Stage of concentration.
Draw your heart, imagine it's a map of Russia. Mark with an asterisk the location of our small homeland.
An asterisk is a symbol of good luck, happiness, light.
Look at the resulting image: in every heart there lives an invisibly image of a small homeland - the place where a person was born, grew up, where his roots are. These roots are surprisingly strong, they remind of the unity of the Earth and Man.
Now focus on the drawing and remember, have you ever been an enemy to your star?
Have you offended your land, plants, animals, birds?
Mentally answer honestly to your heart and give yourself a word not to repeat this ever, but on the contrary, learn yourself and teach others to love their native land, treat it carefully and with love. Just like her poets and writers did.
9. Poetic images.
Read poems about Yakutia.
Semyon Danilov is a national poet of Yakutia. Gently and wisely, he sang of his native land, simply and beautifully expressed love and pride in both Yakutia and Russia.
The poem "Snowdrops".
Through the permafrost
Like a shot coming out
Indomitable Flowers
They stand in bad weather and in the cold.
Appreciate their courage
Take a look, without hiding delight, -
They bloom among the snows,
Decorating my harsh edge.
What feelings of the poet are expressed in this poem? Do you agree with him?
The poem "My Yakutia"
We feel good in the midst of permafrost,
Singing with freezing winds.
We carve a flame from the frost
And we are not afraid of winter darkness.
We breathe free air alone -
Yakuts, Chukchi, Russians, Evens -
And no earth in the whole universe
We don't want anything other than ours.
What is the main idea of the poem?
Moses Efimov is a modern poet of Yakutia.
Poem "Ode to Permafrost"
Taiga land, my beloved land,
Marvelous Yakut plain!
The air is here both in summer and in winter
Fresh as nelm stroganina.
Well, what if in a year
Pick up dirt and garbage -
Everything will be swept away by the spring ice drift,
Sweeps everything - and no questions.
They don't understand anything in life
Who repeats in idle minutes:
They say they live on permafrost
These unfortunate Yakuts.
Yes, the earth is harsh with us,
Life is hard and hard work:
In the bowels turn into a diamond
Drops of sweat we shed.
But one cherished dream
I keep in my soul while I live:
Keep this purity
Youth and freshness age-old.
Task: write down words and phrases related to the topic
Yakutia is my small homeland.
10. Break situation.
Write the word "homeland" again. Make up words from the letters of this word. (Dina, Ira, Laura)
Symbolic?
Motherland - gives birth, kind
11. Dictionary set.
- Choose rhymes for these words:
homeland - chamomile -
Aldan - Tommot -
Earth - snowball -
Birches - pines
Spruce - river -
- Choose good rhymes.
12. Creation of text.
Cards are distributed with the beginning of creative work.
Is on the map of the motherland I love my motherland
I want to say about Tommot There is such a corner in Russia
I've been lucky in my life when I'm sad.
Hello, Aldan Yakutia - the land of gold and diamonds
(the guys do the work for 10 minutes)
13. Socialization.
Reading the works of the student.
14. Reflection.
What was difficult in the lesson?
What was interesting?
What was your mood at the lesson?
What would you like to talk about at the next workshops?
