Alexei Leonov denied rumors that American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin did not land on the moon. And Bormann’s flight with a flyby, and landing, and Apollo 13 too, ”Leonov said. In a commentary to the Zvezda TV channel website, the cosmonaut, twice Hero of the Soviet Union, explained that some of the footage about the flight of Armstrong and Aldrin to the moon really was filmed in the studio. But this was done only so that the viewer could see "the development of what is happening from beginning to end." The actual filming begins after Armstrong sets up a highly directional antenna for transmission to Earth. “Who will film the opening of the hatch from the side when there is no one on the Moon?” - Leonov explained why additional footage of the landing was needed. The video with the landing of American astronauts on the Earth satellite has been controversial for more than a decade. Rumors about the rigging of the flight to the Earth's satellite spread after the widow of American director Stanley Kubrick said that Nixon, inspired by her husband's film "2001: A Space Odyssey", asked the director to film the flight of American astronauts to the moon. "Journalists came to Kubrick's wife, and she said yes, he worked hard when they were making the Moon Landing movie. These are her words verbatim. And this (rumors about the falsification of the flight to the moon - ed. note) is already speculation. And how the flag dangled, but there was no wind. And the flag was reinforced and twisted. When they put it in the ground, they took off the cover - the reinforced tape untwisted, and it seemed as if it was dangling in the wind, ”explained the legendary cosmonaut. in 1969. In an interview with an agency "RIA News" the Soviet cosmonaut emphasized that only “absolutely ignorant people” can believe in such a thing. “Only absolutely ignorant people can seriously believe that the Americans were not on the moon. And, unfortunately, this whole ridiculous epic about shots allegedly fabricated in Hollywood began precisely with the Americans themselves, ”Alexey Leonov noted then. On the eve of the American Patrick Murray published an alleged interview with Stanley Kubrick, where the famous director admits that the videos of the moon landings of Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin were filmed by him in an ordinary studio on Earth. The filmmaker's interview has only just surfaced, as Murray had to sign an 80-page non-disclosure agreement for 15 years since Kubrick's death. However, there is no evidence that the interview is actually real. Perhaps the footage is just an actor who is very similar to the famous directorPhoto: nasa.gov
Almost exactly a year ago, an article was published that then raised a lot of passions about the nature of our local Truman Show. Today, in the piggy bank of "facts" (any fact, I remind you, can be refuted or confirmed with sufficient desire), you can add the following material: Stanley Kubrick's interview about the forgery of lunar footage suddenly surfaced.Is this original or fake? Does Kubrick's revelation confirm everything that was said here earlier about other things as well? Decide for yourself. Let's start a little further:
An excerpt from a conversation with one reptile:
Q: Why is there a "V" on all space agency logos?
O: What do you think?
Q: I think it has to do with some kind of general governing body.
A: This is not just a general governing body, it is a supranational structure. And who controls the states? We! And why would we let you out into real space? And there is no need! So we show you cartoons, and you believe (laughs)
Q: It's not just cartoons...
A: Of course, not all of them, but your pieces of iron do not go into outer space, everything remains under .
Q: Did we even fly to the moon?
A: They flew, but not in what they show you...
In this material, in addition to the very fact of the disclosure of falsification, I am personally interested in three points.
The first concerns the fact that it is made public right now. Guarantees of non-disclosure for a period of 15 years look rather strange. Why exactly 15 and not 25 or 50? And isn't this due to the fact that, according to the GCC, by this date such information would no longer have the slightest significance?
The second interesting point is related to the peculiarity of the biography of Kubrick, who soon after filming moved to Britain, where he was allegedly killed in 1999.
It is not the fact of the murder that is interesting, although the year 1999, when the planned collapse of Russia stalled, may be important. It is interesting that this is Britain, which is one of the main strongholds of the GTC. That is, perhaps long before today he planned the collapse of the myth of the greatness of the United States. Since the publication of this interview cannot be explained by anything other than the desire to humiliate the US country elite.
And, however, it's still nice that the skeletons are gradually starting to get out of the cabinets. I am sure that this is not the last exposure of significant falsifications of history.
And finally the last moment. Is it possible to be completely sure that this interview itself is not a fake? Most likely this is indeed genuine material, but it can still be a fake. But that doesn't really matter either. Apparently, at the global level, it is accepted to consider the flight to the moon as a fake, regardless of the truth. So, it is a fake that they will now begin to consider him. And in any case, this is a black mark on the US country elite.
Stanley Kubrick: "The moon landings were all fake and I was the person who filmed it"
A dying interview of the famous film director Stanley Kubrick has been published, in which he spoke in detail and in detail about the fact that all the landings on the moon were fabricated by NASA and how he filmed all the footage of American lunar expeditions on Earth ... Thus, in the long-term unprecedented lunar offer, the United States itself worldwide the recognized Hollywood master of directing put a bold and final point.
Interview published 15 years after death. Director T. Patrick Murray interviewed Stanley Kubrick three days before his death in March 1999. Previously, he was forced to sign an 88-page non-disclosure agreement (NDA) for the contents of the interview for 15 years from the date of Kubrick's death.
Here is a transcript of an interview with Stanley Kubrick (in English).
In 1971, Kubrick left the US for the UK and never returned to America. All his subsequent films were filmed only in England. For many years, the director led a reclusive life, fearing murder. According to the English newspaper "Sun", the director "was afraid of being killed by American intelligence agencies, following the example of other participants in the television supply of the US lunar scam."
The director died suddenly, allegedly of a heart attack, at the end of the editing period for Eyes Wide Shut, which starred Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman. It was Kidman who in July 2002, in an interview with the American newspaper The National Enquirer, reported that Kubrick had been killed. The director called her 2 hours before the official “sudden death” time and asked her not to come to Hertfordshire, where, as he put it, “we will all be poisoned so quickly that we won’t even have time to sneeze.” According to British journalists, the US National Security Agency first tried to kill Kubrick back in 1979.
The violent nature of Kubrick's death on March 7, 1999 at the English estate near Harpenden (Hertfordshire) later became the cause of his widow's revelations. In the summer of 2003, in an interview on French television, and later, on November 16, 2003, in the program “The Dark Side of the Moon” (CBC Newsworld), the widow of the director, German actress Christiane Kubrick (Christiane Susanne Harlan) made a public confession, the essence of which is as follows:
At a time when the USSR was already in full swing exploring space, US President Richard Nixon, inspired, according to the widow, by her husband's sci-fi epic film, which went down in history as one of the best masterpieces of Hollywood "2001: A Space Odyssey" (1968), urged the director, along with other Hollywood professionals, "to save the national honor and dignity of the United States." What the masters of the "dream factory" led by Kubrick did. The decision to falsify was made personally by the President of the United States.
Similar statements from the participants of the "project" were made before.
In particular, rocket engineer Bill Kaysing, who worked at Rocketdyne, the company that built rocket engines for the Apollo program, is the author of We Never Flew to the Moon. American deception worth $ 30 billion "(" We Never Went to the Moon: America "s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle"), published in 1974 and co-authored with Randy Reid, also stated that under the guise of a live report on the landing of the lunar The NASA module distributed a fake filmed on Earth, which was filmed at a military training ground in the Nevada desert. and all the "lunar expeditions" filmed by Hollywood specialists took place.
There were even daredevils among the astronauts themselves. So, the American astronaut Brian O "Leary, answering a direct question, said that he "cannot give a 100% guarantee that Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin really went to the moon."
However, only now, after the direct confessions of Stanley Kubrick himself - the world-famous Hollywood director of directing, the American lunar offer has come to an end.
1. According to interviewer Patrick Murray, Kubrick gave the interview before his death under the promise of publishing it 15 years after his death and forced him to sign an 88-page non-disclosure agreement. There is a certain inconsistency here, since Kubrick died in 1999 and then, according to the idea, the interview should have appeared not in 2015, but in 2014, although it is possible that 2015 was registered in the NDA, but without seeing this document, if it exists, one can only guess about it.
2. The video itself has already been subjected to various analyzes on Western resources http://www.snopes.com/false-stanley-kubr ick-faked-moon-landings/ and the interviewer has already been accused of using editing in the video and this is not at all Kubrick, and some actor or person very similar to Kubrick. The late director's widow stated that Kubrick did not give this interview. It is quite clear that the authenticity of the record must be beyond doubt in order for this evidence to be accepted. The authentic nature of the tape could seriously undermine the official version of the moon flight due to the credibility of Kubrick's figure as one of the greatest American directors. On the other hand, the falsifications in this video can hit hard on the supporters of the theory that a man did not fly to the moon. While there is no complete certainty that the video is 100% authentic or 100% fake. The video can equally contain the pure truth, the manipulation of one of the supporters of the theory of not visiting the Moon, the hoax of Kubrick himself, who decided after his death to troll the whole world, or a "cunning plan" with the release of a conscious falsification, the exposure of which will hit conspiracy theorists. Therefore, I will say so carefully about this exposure.
3. Kubrick's involvement in the American space program associated with flights to the moon was written about earlier, as part of one of the theories about what exactly the Americans showed instead of landing on the moon and that Kubrick left "hints" in his films about his involvement in the project Apollo 11 .. It is possible that this video is simply the development of one of the offshoots of the conspiracy theory, which originates precisely from the USA, where soon after the official flight to the moon, voices began to multiply that there was no flight and this is all fake, which later and gave rise to a huge number of supporters of this version around the world, including in our country.
From previous posts on the topic:
Interplanetary canning jar. How could this be believed, and what else is fed to us under such a sauce?
And here is a whole film about how Stanley Kubrick shot "moon shots" commissioned by Nixon:
Stanley Kubrick's Odyssey - Lunar Conspiracy
The creators of the new autobiographical film "The Man in the Moon" decided not to include in it the scene with the hoisting of the American flag on the lunar surface, writes The Washington Times columnist Cheryl Chumley. This disregard for history sends the wrong signal, she says, that the US wants to abandon its achievements and national symbols.
A new autobiographical film about astronaut Neil Armstrong, Man in the Moon, is a slap in the face of American society. After all, in this motion picture will be absent " moment of triumph": Hoisting the US flag on the lunar surface, writes The Washington Times columnist Cheryl Chumley.
« This flag-raising was not just a canonical moment in US history. It was the day when the accomplishments of American greatness were put on display for the whole world to see and acknowledge.", - says the author of the article. Now, according to her, the filmmakers about the Apollo 11 mission are going to " blot out these patriotic times».
Gosling's attitude to this issue is understandable. He is Canadian. And, of course, he would like so that the achievements of America spread a little north", says the author of the article.
« But historically, removing the American flag from the very scene that screams "American exceptionalism" during the Cold War race with the evil Soviets,—means not only to offend those associated with this patriotic moment in time, but also practically to present a gift to today's Russia. This sends a signal that modern America not only wants to forget about the days of cool US-USSR relations, foreign tricks and spy mania, but also go even further and give up stupid pride in their national flag.', says Chumley.
However, according to her, any American conservative and supporter of Donald Trump will tell you that he does not intend to share the glory of his country with others. And that's why Man in the Moon and Gosling's statements look like " caricatured They pretend that pride and spirit don't matter.
Meanwhile, America is not just a territory. In many ways, this is a vivid ideal of what can be achieved if freedom is allowed to dominate society, the author of the article emphasizes.
« It was this America that allowed us to send the first man to the moon. This is the kind of America Aldrin and Armstrong proudly represented when they hoisted the US flag. A film that ignores this simple truth is not worth watching.”, concludes Cheryl Chumley.
source Washington Times USA North America tags- 03:00
Four people, including two minors, were killed in a collision between two cars in the Kemerovo region. This was reported in the regional department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.
- 03:00
The official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, said that the United States in foreign policy has returned to the protocol norms of the times of the "Wild West" and follows the principle of simplification, "putting its feet" on the table of world politics.
- 03:00
Anatoly Aksakov, head of the State Duma Committee on the Financial Market, spoke about the importance of the law on limiting the maximum amount of debt on consumer loans.
- 03:00
Chelsea forward Tammy Abraham is demanding a pay rise from his club.
- 03:00
The three-time winner of the Australian Open Grand Slam tournament in doubles Australian Todd Woodbridge called Russian Daniil Medvedev the favorite of the upcoming tournament in singles.
- 03:00
WhatsApp messenger will stop working on smartphones with older versions of iOS and Android operating systems from February 1, 2020.
- 03:00
The head of the Federation Council Committee on Foreign Affairs, Konstantin Kosachev, commented on RT the statement by the United States Ambassador to Poland, Georgette Mosbacher, that Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were responsible for starting World War II.
- 03:00
World champion in pole vault Anzhelika Sidorova believes that the response of the All-Russian Athletic Federation to an open letter written to the organization by the athlete herself, as well as athletes Maria Lasitskene and Sergey Shubenkov, can hardly be called a reaction.
- 03:00
The chief designer of the Tu-160 strategic bomber Valentin Bliznyuk has died at the age of 91, the Tupolev press service reported.
- 03:00
Former Washington Capitals forward Andrei Nikolishin said that psychological pressure should not be a decisive factor in the final group stage match of the youth hockey world championship between the national teams of Russia and Germany.
- 03:00
Bronze medalist of the 2002 Olympic Games in Salt Lake City Andrey Nikolishin answered whether the influence of the legendary former striker Igor Larionov on the Russian youth hockey team is too great.
- 03:00
Russian athlete Sergei Shubenkov commented on the response of the All-Russian Athletics Federation (ARAF) to an open letter written by him, as well as athletes Maria Lasitskene and Anzhelika Sidorova.
- 03:00
Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev commented on the end of negotiations between Ukraine and Russia on gas transit.
- 03:00
Pittsburgh Penguins head coach Mike Sullivan commented on the game of Russian forward Evgeni Malkin in the National Hockey League (NHL) regular season match with the Ottawa Senators (5:2).
- 03:00
The official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, believes that the Swedish 16-year-old schoolgirl Greta Thunberg is primarily a child.
- 03:00
Bronze medalist of the 2002 Olympic Games in Salt Lake City Andrey Nikolishin called the game in the majority the main problem of the Russian youth hockey team at the world championship in the Czech Republic.
- 03:00
Former Washington Capitals forward Andrey Nikolishin expressed the opinion that the goalkeeper of the Russian national hockey team Amir Miftakhov is to blame for only one missed puck in the match with the US national team at the World Youth Championship in the Czech Republic.
- 03:00
A court in the Stavropol Territory sentenced a college student who attacked three minors with acid in the summer of 2017 to five years in prison.
- 03:00
Russian tennis player Vera Zvonareva will not take part in the Australian Open Grand Slam due to injury.
- 03:00
Journalist Vaughn Smith told RT about a phone call from his friend, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is currently in prison in the UK.
- 03:00
Sergei Tsekov, a member of the Federation Council Committee on International Affairs, commented in an interview with RT on the signing by Moscow and Kiev of a package agreement that will allow gas transit through Ukrainian territory to continue after January 1, 2020.
- 03:00
The well-known figure skating coach Rafael Harutyunyan shared his opinion on why there are many athletes in the group of Eteri Tutberidze who can do quadruple jumps.
- 03:00
A plane flying to Moscow made an emergency landing at the Koltsovo airport in Yekaterinburg, Interfax reports.
- 03:00
Olympic bronze medalist Andrey Nikolishin said that the defeat of the Russian national hockey team from the US national team at the World Youth Championship in the Czech Republic was not due to fatigue.
- 03:00
Bronze medalist of the Olympic Games Andrey Nikolishin commented on the defeat of the Russian national hockey team from the US national team at the World Youth Championship in the Czech Republic.
- 03:00
Forward of the Russian national team Nikita Rtishchev shared his expectations from the World Youth Championship match with the German team.
- 03:00
The silver medalist of the 2002 Olympics, choreographer Ilya Averbukh, congratulated Evgenia Medvedeva, two-time world champion in figure skating, on her debut in his ice show The Wizard of Oz.
- 03:00
Prime Minister of Ukraine Oleksiy Honcharuk said that by 2023 the Ukrainian energy system should finally separate from the Russian-Belarusian one and become part of the European one.
- 03:00
Russian forward "New York Rangers" Artemy Panarin received an invitation to take part in the All-Star Game of the National Hockey League (NHL).
- 03:00
As part of the regular season of the National Hockey League (NHL), the Pittsburgh Penguins defeated the Ottawa Senators.
- 03:00
The chief specialist of the Phobos weather center, Yevgeny Tishkovets, said that snow will remain in Moscow on New Year's Eve.
- 03:00
The Department of Health of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug said that four people were hospitalized in the Surgut Trauma Hospital after a bus collided with a cargo trawl.
- 03:00
The price of Brent crude oil is rising. This is evidenced by trading data.
- 03:00
An earthquake with a magnitude of 5.5 was registered in the east of the Kamchatka Peninsula, Interfax was told in the Kamchatka branch of the Unified Geophysical Service of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
- 03:00
State Duma Deputy Vitaly Milonov suggested that the head of the traffic police, Mikhail Chernikov, punish drivers who provoke the formation of traffic jams.
Stanley Kubrick filmed the Apollo moon landings
Illustrious astronaut Alexey Leonov, who personally prepared to participate in the Soviet lunar exploration program, denied years of rumors that American astronauts were not on the moon, and the footage broadcast on television around the world allegedly mounted in Hollywood.
He spoke about this in an interview with RIA Novosti on the eve of the 40th anniversary of the first landing of US astronauts in the history of mankind, celebrated on July 20. Neil Armstrong And Edwin Aldrin to the surface of the earth's satellite.
Correspondent: So were or weren't the Americans on the moon?
“Only absolutely ignorant people can seriously believe that the Americans were not on the moon. And, unfortunately, this whole ridiculous epic about the allegedly fabricated footage in Hollywood began precisely with the Americans themselves. By the way, the first person who began to distribute these rumors, was imprisoned for slander," he said in this regard. Alexey Leonov.
The famous cosmonaut Alexei Leonov
Correspondent Q: Where did the rumors come from?
"It all started with the fact that when, at the celebration of the 80th anniversary of the famous American film director Stanley Kubrick, who created according to the book of science fiction Arthur Clark journalists who met with Kubrick's wife asked about her husband's work on the film in Hollywood studios for their brilliant film "The Odyssey of 2001". And she honestly said that on Earth there are just two real lunar modules - one in the museum, where no filming has ever taken place, and it is even forbidden to walk with a camera, and the other is in Hollywood, where to develop the logic of what is happening on the screen and additional shootings were made landing of Americans on the moon," the Soviet cosmonaut said.
Correspondent : Why was studio shooting used?
Alexey Leonov explained that in order for the viewer to be able to see on the movie screen the development of what is happening from beginning to end, elements of additional shooting.
"It was impossible, for example, to film a real discovery Neil Armstrong the hatch of the descent ship on the Moon - there was simply no one to remove it from the surface! For the same reason, it was impossible to film Armstrong's descent to the moon along the ladder from the ship. These are the moments, really. filmed Kubrick in Hollywood studios to develop the logic of what is happening, and laid the foundation for numerous gossip that the entire landing was allegedly simulated on the set, "explained Alexei Leonov.
Correspondent : Where does truth begin and editing end?
“Real shooting began when Armstrong, who first set foot on the moon, got a little comfortable, installed a highly directional antenna through which broadcast to Earth was carried out. His partner Buzz Aldrin then he also left the ship to the surface and began to film Armstrong, who, in turn, filmed his movement on the surface of the moon," the astronaut specified.
Is it so?
Let's ask a question : what is the volume of captured pictures at the Kubrick Pavilion?
On the Moon and in Earth Orbit no atmosphere to scatter sunlight. Therefore the shadows completely dark and the sky is black even when the sun is shining. The harsh lighting creates a striking effect.
Sun and Earth from orbit, Apollo 11; AS11-36-5293..
Photo taken by an astronaut Gregory Harbau. The photo shows his colleague Joseph Tanner during the second spacewalk associated with the maintenance of the Space Telescope. Hubble in February 1997. The photograph also shows the stern of the Space Shuttle Discovery and the Sun hovering over the thin crescent of the Earth's limb. Tanner holds a checklist in his left hand, and Harbau is reflected in the helmet of his suit. NASA
It should be. At the same time, a Hasselblad with a focal length of 60 mm is used on the surface of the "moon" than in the upper image of Apollo 11. This means that the objects in the images will be 25% smaller, in particular the Sun. However, in the pictures of a man’s stay on the moon in 1969-1972, everything is different - optical crown and halo around the sun, the angular dimensions of the "sun" are 10 degrees! This twenty times more than the real size of 0.5 degrees (the apparent size of the Sun in the vicinity of the Earth). Below are a number of pictures.
View of the sun near the LM landing site. Apollo 12. AS12-46-6739
View of the sun 100 meters from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 12. AS12-46-6763
View of the sun 300 meters from the LM landing site. Apollo 14. AS14-64-9177
View of the sun 4 km from the LM landing site. Apollo 15. AS15-87-11745
View of the sun near the LM landing site. Apollo 15. AS15-85-11367
View of the sun 300 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 16. AS16-109-17856
View of the sun 100 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo 17. AS17-134-20410
View of the sun 50 m from the landing site of the LM. Apollo17. AS17-147-22580. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 60 mm; Sun Elevation: 16°; Description: STA ALSEP; Film Width: 70 mm.
Halo and crown around the sun on Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 indicate the presence of an atmosphere. Details on halo and optical phenomena. Below are pictures of the halo and crown of light sources on Earth in the presence of an atmosphere.
The sun and the halo around it for terrestrial conditions.
Rays and a crown from the sun for terrestrial conditions
Crowns of the Sun.
Halo and crowns of street lamps
1. Optical phenomena are associated with refraction and diffraction on atmospheric water droplets
The diagram shows how two points on the surface of a drop can scatter light and act as sources of a diverging spherical wave. The light increases where the crests of the waves coincide or are of the same sign. The intensity of light decreases where the waves have different amplitudes. Scattered light from the entire surface of the drop plus the contribution of the reflected and transmitted waves are combined in the diffraction pattern - the corona.
The first figure shows the corona from the diffraction of light by small particles. Each point of the illuminated surface is a source of scattered divergent spherical waves ( Huygens-Fresnel principle). The divergent waves intersect each other, where they add up give areas of increased brightness, and where they subtract - dark areas.
The second figure shows scattering from only two points along the central axis, the direction of the incident light, the crests of the two scattered waves always coincide with the shape of the area with bright light intensity.
The third figure shows the sum of all coronas from each spectrum and each particle.
All Apollo photographs with optical phenomena from the sun completely fit within the framework of refraction and diffraction on atmospheric water droplets.
2. Increasing the angular dimensions of the "Sun"
In the case of vacuum, the angular dimensions of the sun, like any light source, remain the same. In the presence of an atmosphere, the situation is different.
Any light wave is scattered by electrons, atoms and molecules of the atmosphere. Moreover, the intensity of the scattered light is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the light wavelength. Because of this, each particle becomes a source of light, especially for blue rays. It's about like a diverging wave from a float, after the main wave has passed through it. As a result, due to the presence of an atmosphere, molecules emit light in all directions, especially brightly near the light source. At very high brightness and exposure, it leads to flare on the film and an increase in the angular dimensions of the light source. An example is shown below.
Electric arc; about 5 mm in size. Due to the scattering of light by air molecules, the size of the light ball is tens of times larger than the size of the plasma channel of the arc.
Finally, with a slight coverage of the light source, due to light scattering in the atmosphere, a halo is preserved. This is what we see in the Apollo pictures. There are no such optical phenomena in real vacuum.
Apollo 14. AS14-66-9305
3. The cause of optical phenomena on the moon is dust
On Earth, we often see a blurry sun, for example through a cloud. This is the scattering of sunlight on aerosols (fog, smoke, dust). Their volume in the earth's atmosphere is no more than 0.1% of the volume of gases that make up atmospheric air. Similarly, it can be assumed for the Moon. This means that in order to observe at least approximately the same optical phenomena (corona, crown, and light scattering), the total mass of particles on the Moon per unit volume must be at least 1 g/m³. This is a huge number of particles and is equivalent to the existence of an aerosol atmosphere on the Moon. Still nothing like this was not found.
DISCUSSION
We have more than 5% of the volume of photographs of man's stay on the Moon in 1969-1972 with the image of halos, solar crowns and light scattering, which indicates the presence of an atmosphere. Considering that 5% of the images are included in the panoramas of the area, it can be firmly stated that 30% of the images from the total volume of photographic materials or more than 70% of the stay of astronauts on the surface of the "Moon" is made in the presence of an atmosphere.
The Apollo 12 panorama (a12pan1162447) consists of more than two dozen photographs, two of which are of the Sun.
More than 70% of photographic documents are photographs taken by Stanley Kubrick! Statement by illustrious cosmonaut Alexei Leonov in support of the Americans' stay on the Moon and about minor studio additional filming bankrupt.
In addition, all images are linked into libraries: 1) Expedition exits, 2) Image numbers, 3) Audio conversations, 4) Apollo videos on the official website of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). And this means that the pictures of terrestrial origin, along with audio conversations to them NASA issues for documents man's stay on the moon.
Conclusion: This falsification man's stay on the moon, which has been maintained at the highest official level for more than 40 years.
Glare and optical effects from the "sun" for Apollo 11
The first thing to note is the presence of up to 10 different optical axes (the optical axis is a lens) and the absence of one axis of the light source (in this case, the Sun) in the images. According to the laws of Optics, all highlights on the optical axes for one light source converge at one point. This not in any photo Apollo 11 during their stay on the surface of the moon. At the same time, for images from the Apollo 11 orbit, we see one optical axis of the light source, the Sun, and the absence of a huge number of lighting effects, in particular, the absence of an optical halo, is also noticeable.
On some double vision shadows of the lunar module.
Below pictures
Multiple axes of the light source. Apollo 11, AS11-40-5872HR. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Film Width: 70mm
Three axis light source. Apollo 11, AS11-40-5935HR. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Film Width: 70mm
These patterns are obvious for other shots with optical highlights. Below are the glare from the Sun in the same Apollo 11 Hasselblad camera:
View of Earth from orbit, Apollo 11; AS11-36-5293.Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70 mm.
View of the Earth from orbit; Apollo 11, AS11-36-5299.Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70mm
We see one optical axis of the light source, the Sun, and the absence of a huge number of lighting effects, in particular, the absence of an optical halo, is also noticeable. On some light sources in the sky on the "Moon" for Apollo 11 also indicates double vision lunar module shadows:
Ghost shadows from the lunar module indicate multiple light sources above the surface of the moon. AS11-37-5463, AS11-37-5475, AS11-37-5476 andWithincreasedcontrast, brightness. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Magazine: 37; Description: LUNAR MODULE SHADOW ON SURFACE; Film Width: 70 mm.
Two shadows exactly repeat the contour of the lunar module and details: an antenna for long-distance communication and for radio communications of astronauts, an auxiliary engine system, and more. And this is not one random shot, not three shots, but photo series Magazine 37 - about 20 shots! One could suggest that there are always two shadows on the Moon - one from the Sun, the other from the huge and bright crescent of the Earth! However, look - this is the Earth in the pictures of Apollo 11:
View of the lunar module and Earth for Apollo 11; AS11-40-5923, AS11-40-5924. LUNAR MODULE; EARTH.
Compare with the brightness of the Sun (see pictures above). In general, the Sun is far from the most powerful star in existence, but it is relatively close to the Earth and therefore shines very brightly - 500,000 times brighter than the full Moon and 5,000 times brighter than the full Earth when viewed from the Moon. Our planet shines several orders of magnitude lower.! In addition, keep in mind that the Earth is at its zenith. And what is the shadow of the Earth?! Under you!
All together - this is the absurdities of NASA and the lack of knowledge
But even after the revelation of the fact that the Apollo 11 images of the moon landing indicate the presence of several light sources in the sky and this is a falsification, NASA defenders persist in their: "Americans walked on the moon." The amazing nature of the debaters!
This note about multiple lights in the sky on the Moon does not apply to glare for the rest of the sojourn missions: Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17. For the images of these missions, we have one axis of the light source. And here it should be noted that the shooting conditions are the same - the low position of the Sun above the horizon, the optical equipment is the same - the Hasselblad camera, the shooting technique is the same, the picture is the same as for Orlov ... However, the axis of the light source is the only one. Photos of Apollo 11 fall out from the general rule. Probably NASA on the "first" flight to the moon not enough power one spotlight.
You can also note the minor "strangeness" of glare on the optics of Apollo 11, in general, the Apollo mission:
- the presence of equidistant twisted spirals in the flare, as in a long-range searchlight;
– asymmetry of glare elements, which is possible if the light source is not symmetrical;
- glare from the presence of a drop of liquid on the lens (re-reflection on the surface of the drop);
– halo and crown (crown) around the sun for Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17, which is possible only in the presence of an atmosphere;
- other.
The halo and crown around the sun in the Apollo 17 image (AS17-147-22580) indicates the presence of an atmosphere. in detail OhaloAndopticalphenomena . Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 60 mm; Sun Elevation: 16°; Description: STA ALSEP; Film Width: 70 mm.
Conclusion: before us some light sources illuminate the surface of the "Moon" for the Apollo 11 astronauts. This indicates hoax NASA lunar conditions in the pavilion on the ground.
US moon scam. Yuri Mukhin. MaximumliesAndnonsense
More detailed and a variety of information about the events taking place in Russia, Ukraine and other countries of our beautiful planet can be obtained at Internet conferences, constantly held on the website "Keys of Knowledge". All Conferences are open and completely free. We invite all waking up and interested ...
Legendary director Stanley Kubrick 2001: A Space Odyssey", "A Clockwork Orange", "The Shining", "Eyes Wide Shut"), a few days before his death, admitted that The US government and NASA paid him a large amount of money to film the landing of US astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin on the moon.In fact, historical footage was allegedly filmed by him in an ordinary studio on Earth.
In the photo: Stanley Kubrick during the work on the film "2001: A Space Odyssey"
Such a sensational statement was made byAmerican Patrick Murray, posting a video interview purporting to be Stanley Kubrick, made 15 years ago.
As explained on the site, the filmmaker's interview only appeared now, as Murray had to sign an 80-page non-disclosure agreement for 15 years from the date of the death of Kubrick, who, we recall, died on March 17, 1999.
I committed a huge fraud on the American public. With the participation of the United States government and NASA. The moon landing was faked, all the landings were fake and I was the person who filmed it."
confesses in the video a man who looks like Stanley Kubrick.
"What are you saying? Are you serious?" Murray laughs.
"Yes, it's a fake," the American director repeats again.
According to Kubrick, the moon landing was only a fantasy of President Nixon, who really wanted to make it a reality. The US government offered the director a large sum of money for filming a plausible video document, and he allegedly agreed to make a "movie".
However, while there is no official evidence that this interview is really real. Perhaps the footage is just an actor who is very similar to a famous director.
Recall that on July 20, 1969, the whole world saw the footage that has already become historical, in which the astronaut of the Apollo 11 mission, Neil Armstrong, makes " one small step for a man, but a giant leap for all mankind."
It is worth noting that in 1971 Kubrick moved from the US to the UK. In the last years of his life, the director repeatedly stated that the American special services would kill him. In 1999, he died, according to the official version - from a heart attack, but many experts believe that the director was killed.
The wife of director Christian Kubrick after her husband's death also claimed that the moon landing was faked in order to "save the honor and dignity of the United States."
Meanwhile, Alexei Leonov, the first person to perform a spacewalk, in an interview with TV channel Zvezda denied rumors that American astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin did not land on the moon.
Specialists, including myself, and our lunar group watched one-to-one online how it happened. And Bormann's flight with a flyby in Moscow, and landing, and "Apollo 13" too, ”-
quotes TV channel Leonov.
In a commentary to the site, the pilot-cosmonaut, twice Hero of the Soviet Union, explained that some of the footage about the flight of Armstrong and Aldrin to the moon was indeed filmed in the studio. But this was done only so that the viewer could see "the development of what is happening from beginning to end." The actual shooting begins after Armstrong sets up a highly directional antenna for broadcasting to Earth.
Who will film the opening of the hatch from the side when there is no one on the moon? -
Leonov explained why additional footage of the landing was needed.
The video of the landing of American astronauts on the Earth’s satellite has been controversial for more than a decade. Rumors about the rigging of the flight to the Moon spread after the widow of American director Stanley Kubrick told reporters about her husband's participation in the filming of the film about the Apollo 11 mission.
Journalists came to Kubrick's wife, and she said: yes, he worked hard when they created the film "Landing on the Moon." These are her words verbatim. And this (rumors about the falsification of the flight to the moon - ed. note) is already speculation. And how the flag dangled, but there was no wind. And the flag was reinforced and twisted. When they put it in the ground, they took off the cover - the reinforced tape untwisted, and it seemed as if it was dangling in the wind, ”
explained the legendary Soviet cosmonaut.
In 2009, Alexei Leonov already spoke out about the rumors that the Americans were not on the moon in 1969. In an interview with RIA Novosti, Leonov stressed that only “absolutely ignorant people” can believe in such a thing.
Only absolutely ignorant people can seriously believe that the Americans were not on the moon. And, unfortunately, this whole ridiculous epic about shots allegedly fabricated in Hollywood began precisely with the Americans themselves, ”
noted then Alexei Leonov.
