Let's say Achilles runs ten times faster than the tortoise and is a thousand paces behind it. During the time during which Achilles runs this distance, the tortoise crawls a hundred steps in the same direction. When Achilles has run a hundred steps, the tortoise will crawl another ten steps, and so on. The process will continue indefinitely, Achilles will never catch up with the tortoise.
This reasoning became a logical shock for all subsequent generations. Aristotle, Diogenes, Kant, Hegel, Gilbert... All of them, in one way or another, considered Zeno's aporias. The shock was so strong that " ... discussions continue at the present time, the scientific community has not yet managed to come to a common opinion about the essence of paradoxes ... mathematical analysis, set theory, new physical and philosophical approaches were involved in the study of the issue; none of them became a universally accepted solution to the problem ..."[Wikipedia," Zeno's Aporias "]. Everyone understands that they are being fooled, but no one understands what the deception is.
From the point of view of mathematics, Zeno in his aporia clearly demonstrated the transition from the value to. This transition implies applying instead of constants. As far as I understand, the mathematical apparatus for applying variable units of measurement has either not yet been developed, or it has not been applied to Zeno's aporia. The application of our usual logic leads us into a trap. We, by the inertia of thinking, apply constant units of time to the reciprocal. From a physical point of view, this looks like a slowdown in time until it stops completely at the moment when Achilles catches up with the tortoise. If time stops, Achilles can no longer overtake the tortoise.
If we turn the logic we are used to, everything falls into place. Achilles runs at a constant speed. Each subsequent segment of its path is ten times shorter than the previous one. Accordingly, the time spent on overcoming it is ten times less than the previous one. If we apply the concept of "infinity" in this situation, then it would be correct to say "Achilles will infinitely quickly overtake the tortoise."
How to avoid this logical trap? Remain in constant units of time and do not switch to reciprocal values. In Zeno's language, it looks like this:
In the time it takes Achilles to run a thousand steps, the tortoise crawls a hundred steps in the same direction. During the next time interval, equal to the first, Achilles will run another thousand steps, and the tortoise will crawl one hundred steps. Now Achilles is eight hundred paces ahead of the tortoise.
This approach adequately describes reality without any logical paradoxes. But this is not a complete solution to the problem. Einstein's statement about the insurmountability of the speed of light is very similar to Zeno's aporia "Achilles and the tortoise". We have yet to study, rethink and solve this problem. And the solution must be sought not in infinitely large numbers, but in units of measurement.
Another interesting aporia of Zeno tells of a flying arrow:
A flying arrow is motionless, since at each moment of time it is at rest, and since it is at rest at every moment of time, it is always at rest.
In this aporia, the logical paradox is overcome very simply - it is enough to clarify that at each moment of time the flying arrow is at rest at different points in space, which, in fact, is movement. There is another point to be noted here. From one photograph of a car on the road, it is impossible to determine either the fact of its movement or the distance to it. To determine the fact of the movement of the car, two photographs taken from the same point at different points in time are needed, but they cannot be used to determine the distance. To determine the distance to the car, you need two photographs taken from different points in space at the same time, but you cannot determine the fact of movement from them (naturally, you still need additional data for calculations, trigonometry will help you). What I want to point out in particular is that two points in time and two points in space are two different things that should not be confused as they provide different opportunities for exploration.
Wednesday, July 4, 2018
Very well the differences between set and multiset are described in Wikipedia. We look.
As you can see, "the set cannot have two identical elements", but if there are identical elements in the set, such a set is called a "multiset". Reasonable beings will never understand such logic of absurdity. This is the level of talking parrots and trained monkeys, in which the mind is absent from the word "completely." Mathematicians act as ordinary trainers, preaching their absurd ideas to us.
Once upon a time, the engineers who built the bridge were in a boat under the bridge during the tests of the bridge. If the bridge collapsed, the mediocre engineer died under the rubble of his creation. If the bridge could withstand the load, the talented engineer built other bridges.
No matter how mathematicians hide behind the phrase "mind me, I'm in the house", or rather "mathematics studies abstract concepts", there is one umbilical cord that inextricably connects them with reality. This umbilical cord is money. Let us apply mathematical set theory to mathematicians themselves.
We studied mathematics very well and now we are sitting at the cash desk, paying salaries. Here a mathematician comes to us for his money. We count the entire amount to him and lay it out on our table into different piles, in which we put bills of the same denomination. Then we take one bill from each pile and give the mathematician his "mathematical salary set". We explain the mathematics that he will receive the rest of the bills only when he proves that the set without identical elements is not equal to the set with identical elements. This is where the fun begins.
First of all, the deputies' logic will work: "you can apply it to others, but not to me!" Further, assurances will begin that there are different banknote numbers on banknotes of the same denomination, which means that they cannot be considered identical elements. Well, we count the salary in coins - there are no numbers on the coins. Here the mathematician will frantically recall physics: different coins have different amounts of dirt, the crystal structure and arrangement of atoms for each coin is unique ...
And now I have the most interesting question: where is the boundary beyond which elements of a multiset turn into elements of a set and vice versa? Such a line does not exist - everything is decided by shamans, science here is not even close.
Look here. We select football stadiums with the same field area. The area of the fields is the same, which means we have a multiset. But if we consider the names of the same stadiums, we get a lot, because the names are different. As you can see, the same set of elements is both a set and a multiset at the same time. How right? And here the mathematician-shaman-shuller takes out a trump ace from his sleeve and begins to tell us either about a set or a multiset. In any case, he will convince us that he is right.
To understand how modern shamans operate with set theory, tying it to reality, it is enough to answer one question: how do the elements of one set differ from the elements of another set? I will show you, without any "conceivable as not a single whole" or "not conceivable as a single whole."
Sunday, March 18, 2018
The sum of the digits of a number is a dance of shamans with a tambourine, which has nothing to do with mathematics. Yes, in mathematics lessons we are taught to find the sum of the digits of a number and use it, but they are shamans for that, to teach their descendants their skills and wisdom, otherwise shamans will simply die out.
Do you need proof? Open Wikipedia and try to find the "Sum of Digits of a Number" page. She doesn't exist. There is no formula in mathematics by which you can find the sum of the digits of any number. After all, numbers are graphic symbols with which we write numbers, and in the language of mathematics, the task sounds like this: "Find the sum of graphic symbols representing any number." Mathematicians cannot solve this problem, but shamans can do it elementarily.
Let's figure out what and how we do in order to find the sum of the digits of a given number. And so, let's say we have the number 12345. What needs to be done in order to find the sum of the digits of this number? Let's consider all the steps in order.
1. Write down the number on a piece of paper. What have we done? We have converted the number to a number graphic symbol. This is not a mathematical operation.
2. We cut one received picture into several pictures containing separate numbers. Cutting a picture is not a mathematical operation.
3. Convert individual graphic characters to numbers. This is not a mathematical operation.
4. Add up the resulting numbers. Now that's mathematics.
The sum of the digits of the number 12345 is 15. These are the "cutting and sewing courses" from shamans used by mathematicians. But that is not all.
From the point of view of mathematics, it does not matter in which number system we write the number. So, in different number systems, the sum of the digits of the same number will be different. In mathematics, the number system is indicated as a subscript to the right of the number. With a large number of 12345, I don’t want to fool my head, consider the number 26 from the article about. Let's write this number in binary, octal, decimal and hexadecimal number systems. We will not consider each step under a microscope, we have already done that. Let's look at the result.
As you can see, in different number systems, the sum of the digits of the same number is different. This result has nothing to do with mathematics. It's like finding the area of a rectangle in meters and centimeters would give you completely different results.
Zero in all number systems looks the same and has no sum of digits. This is another argument in favor of the fact that . A question for mathematicians: how is it denoted in mathematics that which is not a number? What, for mathematicians, nothing but numbers exists? For shamans, I can allow this, but for scientists, no. Reality is not just about numbers.
The result obtained should be considered as proof that number systems are units of measurement of numbers. After all, we cannot compare numbers with different units of measurement. If the same actions with different units of measurement of the same quantity lead to different results after comparing them, then this has nothing to do with mathematics.
What is real mathematics? This is when the result of a mathematical action does not depend on the value of the number, the unit of measure used, and on who performs this action.
Oh! Isn't this the women's restroom?
- Young woman! This is a laboratory for studying the indefinite holiness of souls upon ascension to heaven! Nimbus on top and arrow up. What other toilet?
Female... A halo on top and an arrow down is male.
If you have such a work of design art flashing before your eyes several times a day,
Then it is not surprising that you suddenly find a strange icon in your car:
Personally, I make an effort on myself to see minus four degrees in a pooping person (one picture) (composition of several pictures: minus sign, number four, degrees designation). And I do not consider this girl a fool who does not know physics. She just has an arc stereotype of perception of graphic images. And mathematicians teach us this all the time. Here is an example.
1A is not "minus four degrees" or "one a". This is "pooping man" or the number "twenty-six" in the hexadecimal number system. Those people who constantly work in this number system automatically perceive the number and letter as one graphic symbol.
Adding and subtracting fractions with the same denominators
Adding and subtracting fractions with different denominators
The concept of the NOC
Bringing fractions to the same denominator
How to add a whole number and a fraction
1 Adding and subtracting fractions with the same denominators
To add fractions with the same denominators, you need to add their numerators, and leave the denominator the same, for example:
To subtract fractions with the same denominators, subtract the numerator of the second fraction from the numerator of the first fraction, and leave the denominator the same, for example:
To add mixed fractions, you must separately add their whole parts, and then add their fractional parts, and write the result as a mixed fraction,
If, when adding the fractional parts, an improper fraction is obtained, we select the integer part from it and add it to the integer part, for example:
2 Adding and subtracting fractions with different denominators
In order to add or subtract fractions with different denominators, you must first bring them to the same denominator, and then proceed as indicated at the beginning of this article. The common denominator of several fractions is the LCM (least common multiple). For the numerator of each of the fractions, additional factors are found by dividing the LCM by the denominator of this fraction. We'll look at an example later, after we figure out what an LCM is.
3 Least common multiple (LCM)
The least common multiple of two numbers (LCM) is the smallest natural number that is divisible by both of these numbers without a remainder. Sometimes the LCM can be found orally, but more often, especially when working with large numbers, you have to find the LCM in writing, using the following algorithm:
In order to find the LCM of several numbers, you need:
- Decompose these numbers into prime factors
- Take the largest expansion, and write these numbers as a product
- Select in other expansions the numbers that do not occur in the largest expansion (or occur in it a smaller number of times), and add them to the product.
- Multiply all the numbers in the product, this will be the LCM.
For example, let's find the LCM of numbers 28 and 21:
4Reducing fractions to the same denominator
Let's go back to adding fractions with different denominators.
When we reduce fractions to the same denominator, equal to the LCM of both denominators, we must multiply the numerators of these fractions by additional multipliers. You can find them by dividing the LCM by the denominator of the corresponding fraction, for example:
Thus, in order to bring fractions to one indicator, you must first find the LCM (that is, the smallest number that is divisible by both denominators) of the denominators of these fractions, then put additional factors on the numerators of the fractions. You can find them by dividing the common denominator (LCD) by the denominator of the corresponding fraction. Then you need to multiply the numerator of each fraction by an additional factor, and put the LCM as the denominator.
5How to add a whole number and a fraction
In order to add a whole number and a fraction, you just need to add this number in front of the fraction, and you get a mixed fraction, for example.
Consider the fraction $\frac63$. Its value is 2, because $\frac63 =6:3 = 2$. What happens if the numerator and denominator are multiplied by 2? $\frac63 \times 2=\frac(12)(6)$. Obviously, the value of the fraction has not changed, so $\frac(12)(6)$ is also equal to 2 as y. multiply the numerator and denominator by 3 and get $\frac(18)(9)$, or by 27 and get $\frac(162)(81)$ or by 101 and get $\frac(606)(303)$. In each of these cases, the value of the fraction that we get by dividing the numerator by the denominator is 2. This means that it has not changed.
The same pattern is observed in the case of other fractions. If the numerator and denominator of the fraction $\frac(120)(60)$ (equal to 2) is divided by 2 (result of $\frac(60)(30)$), or by 3 (result of $\frac(40)(20) $), or by 4 (the result of $\frac(30)(15)$) and so on, then in each case the value of the fraction remains unchanged and equal to 2.
This rule also applies to fractions that are not equal. whole number.
If the numerator and denominator of the fraction $\frac(1)(3)$ are multiplied by 2, we get $\frac(2)(6)$, that is, the value of the fraction has not changed. And in fact, if you divide the cake into 3 parts and take one of them, or divide it into 6 parts and take 2 parts, you will get the same amount of pie in both cases. Therefore, the numbers $\frac(1)(3)$ and $\frac(2)(6)$ are identical. Let's formulate a general rule.
The numerator and denominator of any fraction can be multiplied or divided by the same number, and the value of the fraction does not change.
This rule is very useful. For example, it allows in some cases, but not always, to avoid operations with large numbers.
For example, we can divide the numerator and denominator of the fraction $\frac(126)(189)$ by 63 and get the fraction $\frac(2)(3)$ which is much easier to calculate. One more example. The numerator and denominator of the fraction $\frac(155)(31)$ can be divided by 31 to get the fraction $\frac(5)(1)$ or 5, since 5:1=5.
In this example, we first encountered a fraction whose denominator is 1. Such fractions play an important role in calculations. It should be remembered that any number can be divided by 1 and its value will not change. That is, $\frac(273)(1)$ is equal to 273; $\frac(509993)(1)$ equals 509993 and so on. Therefore, we do not have to divide numbers by , since every integer can be represented as a fraction with a denominator of 1.
With such fractions, the denominator of which is equal to 1, you can perform the same arithmetic operations as with all other fractions: $\frac(15)(1)+\frac(15)(1)=\frac(30)(1) $, $\frac(4)(1) \times \frac(3)(1)=\frac(12)(1)$.
You may ask what is the use of representing an integer as a fraction, which will have a unit under the line, because it is more convenient to work with an integer. But the fact is that the representation of an integer as a fraction gives us the opportunity to perform various actions more efficiently when we are dealing with both integers and fractional numbers at the same time. For example, to learn add fractions with different denominators. Suppose we need to add $\frac(1)(3)$ and $\frac(1)(5)$.
We know that you can only add fractions whose denominators are equal. So, we need to learn how to bring fractions to such a form when their denominators are equal. In this case, we again need the fact that you can multiply the numerator and denominator of a fraction by the same number without changing its value.
First, we multiply the numerator and denominator of the fraction $\frac(1)(3)$ by 5. We get $\frac(5)(15)$, the value of the fraction has not changed. Then we multiply the numerator and denominator of the fraction $\frac(1)(5)$ by 3. We get $\frac(3)(15)$, again the value of the fraction has not changed. Therefore, $\frac(1)(3)+\frac(1)(5)=\frac(5)(15)+\frac(3)(15)=\frac(8)(15)$.
Now let's try to apply this system to the addition of numbers containing both integer and fractional parts.
We need to add $3 + \frac(1)(3)+1\frac(1)(4)$. First, we convert all the terms into fractions and get: $\frac31 + \frac(1)(3)+\frac(5)(4)$. Now we need to bring all the fractions to a common denominator, for this we multiply the numerator and denominator of the first fraction by 12, the second by 4, and the third by 3. As a result, we get $\frac(36)(12) + \frac(4 )(12)+\frac(15)(12)$, which is equal to $\frac(55)(12)$. If you want to get rid of improper fraction, it can be turned into a number consisting of an integer and a fractional part: $\frac(55)(12) = \frac(48)(12)+\frac(7)(12)$ or $4\frac(7)( 12)$.
All the rules that allow operations with fractions, which we have just studied, are also valid in the case of negative numbers. So, -1: 3 can be written as $\frac(-1)(3)$, and 1: (-3) as $\frac(1)(-3)$.
Since both dividing a negative number by a positive number and dividing a positive number by a negative result in negative numbers, in both cases we will get the answer in the form of a negative number. That is
$(-1) : 3 = \frac(1)(3)$ or $1 : (-3) = \frac(1)(-3)$. The minus sign when written this way refers to the entire fraction as a whole, and not separately to the numerator or denominator.
On the other hand, (-1) : (-3) can be written as $\frac(-1)(-3)$, and since dividing a negative number by a negative number gives a positive number, then $\frac(-1 )(-3)$ can be written as $+\frac(1)(3)$.
Addition and subtraction of negative fractions is carried out in the same way as the addition and subtraction of positive fractions. For example, what is $1- 1\frac13$? Let's represent both numbers as fractions and get $\frac(1)(1)-\frac(4)(3)$. Let's reduce the fractions to a common denominator and get $\frac(1 \times 3)(1 \times 3)-\frac(4)(3)$, i.e. $\frac(3)(3)-\frac(4) (3)$, or $-\frac(1)(3)$.
As you know from mathematics, a fractional number consists of a numerator and a denominator. The numerator is at the top and the denominator at the bottom.
It is quite simple to perform mathematical operations on the addition or subtraction of fractional quantities with the same denominator. You just need to be able to add or subtract the numbers in the numerator (top), and the same bottom number remains unchanged.
For example, let's take the fractional number 7/9, here:
- the number "seven" on top is the numerator;
- the number "nine" below is the denominator.
Example 1. Addition:
5/49 + 4/49 = (5+4) / 49 =9/49.
Example 2. Subtraction:
6/35−3/35 = (6−3) / 35 = 3/35.
Subtraction of simple fractional values \u200b\u200bthat have a different denominator
To perform a mathematical operation to subtract values that have a different denominator, you must first bring them to a common denominator. When performing this task, it is necessary to adhere to the rule that this common denominator must be the smallest of all possible options.
Example 3
Given two simple quantities with different denominators (lower numbers): 7/8 and 2/9.
Subtract the second from the first value.
The solution consists of several steps:
1. Find the common lower number, i.e. that which is divisible both by the lower value of the first fraction and the second. This will be the number 72, since it is a multiple of the numbers "eight" and "nine".
2. The bottom digit of each fraction has increased:
- the number "eight" in the fraction 7/8 increased nine times - 8*9=72;
- the number "nine" in the fraction 2/9 has increased eight times - 9*8=72.
3. If the denominator (lower number) has changed, then the numerator (upper number) must also change. According to the existing mathematical rule, the upper figure must be increased by exactly the same amount as the lower one. That is:
- the numerator "seven" in the first fraction (7/8) is multiplied by the number "nine" - 7*9=63;
- the numerator "two" in the second fraction (2/9) is multiplied by the number "eight" - 2*8=16.
4. As a result of the actions, we got two new values, which, however, are identical to the original ones.
- first: 7/8 = 7*9 / 8*9 = 63/72;
- second: 2/9 = 2*8 / 9*8 = 16/72.
5. Now it is allowed to subtract one fractional number from another:
7/8−2/9 = 63/72−16/72 =?
6. Performing this action, we return to the topic of subtracting fractions with the same lower numbers (denominators). And this means that the subtraction action will be carried out from above, in the numerator, and the lower figure is transferred without changes.
63/72−16/72 = (63−16) / 72 = 47/72.
7/8−2/9 = 47/72.
Example 4
Let's complicate the problem by taking several fractions for solving with different, but multiple digits at the bottom.
Values given: 5/6; 1/3; 1/12; 7/24.
They must be taken away from each other in this sequence.
1. We bring the fractions in the above way to a common denominator, which will be the number "24":
- 5/6 = 5*4 / 6*4 = 20/24;
- 1/3 = 1*8 / 3*8 = 8/24;
- 1/12 = 1*2 / 12*2 = 2/24.
7/24 - we leave this last value unchanged, since the denominator is the total number "24".
2. Subtract all values:
20/24−8/2−2/24−7/24 = (20−8−2−7)/24 = 3/24.
3. Since the numerator and denominator of the resulting fraction are divisible by one number, they can be reduced by dividing by the number "three":
3:3 / 24:3 = 1/8.
4. We write the answer like this:
5/6−1/3−1/12−7/24 = 1/8.
Example 5
Given three fractions with non-multiple denominators: 3/4; 2/7; 1/13.
You need to find the difference.
1. We bring the first two numbers to a common denominator, it will be the number "28":
- ¾ \u003d 3 * 7 / 4 * 7 \u003d 21/28;
- 2/7 = 2*4 / 7*4 = 8/28.
2. Subtract the first two fractions between each other:
¾−2/7 = 21/28−8/28 = (21−8) / 28 = 13/28.
3. Subtract the third given fraction from the resulting value:
4. We bring the numbers to a common denominator. If it is not possible to choose the same denominator in an easier way, then you just need to perform the steps by multiplying all the denominators in series with each other, not forgetting to increase the value of the numerator by the same figure. In this example, we do this:
- 13/28 \u003d 13 * 13 / 28 * 13 \u003d 169/364, where 13 is the lower digit from 5/13;
- 5/13 \u003d 5 * 28 / 13 * 28 \u003d 140/364, where 28 is the lower digit from 13/28.
5. Subtract the resulting fractions:
13/28−5/13 = 169/364−140/364 = (169−140) / 364 = 29/364.
Answer: ¾-2/7-5/13 = 29/364.
Mixed fractional numbers
In the examples discussed above, only proper fractions were used.
As an example:
- 8/9 is a proper fraction;
- 9/8 is wrong.
It is impossible to turn an improper fraction into a proper one, but it is possible to turn it into mixed. Why is the top number (numerator) divided by the bottom number (denominator) to get a number with a remainder. The integer resulting from division is written down in this way, the remainder is written in the numerator at the top, and the denominator, which is at the bottom, remains the same. To make it clearer, consider a specific example:
Example 6
We convert the improper fraction 9/8 into the proper one.
To do this, we divide the number "nine" by "eight", as a result we get a mixed fraction with an integer and a remainder:
9: 8 = 1 and 1/8 (in another way it can be written as 1 + 1/8), where:
- the number 1 is the integer resulting from the division;
- another number 1 - the remainder;
- the number 8 is the denominator, which has remained unchanged.
An integer is also called a natural number.
The remainder and denominator are a new, but already correct fraction.
When writing the number 1, it is written before the correct fraction 1/8.
Subtracting mixed numbers with different denominators
From the above, we give the definition of a mixed fractional number: "Mixed number - this is a value that is equal to the sum of a whole number and a proper ordinary fraction. In this case, the whole part is called natural number, and the number that is in the remainder is its fractional part».
Example 7
Given: two mixed fractional quantities, consisting of a whole number and a proper fraction:
- the first value is 9 and 4/7, that is, (9 + 4/7);
- the second value is 3 and 5/21, i.e. (3+5/21).
It is required to find the difference between these values.
1. To subtract 3+5/21 from 9+4/7, you must first subtract integer values from each other:
4/7−5/21 = 4*3 / 7*3−5/21 =12/21−5/21 = (12−5) / 21 = 7/21.
3. The result of the difference between two mixed numbers will consist of a natural (integer) number 6 and a proper fraction 7/21 = 1/3:
(9 + 4/7) - (3 + 5/21) = 6 + 1/3.
Mathematicians of all countries have agreed that the “+” sign when writing mixed quantities can be omitted and only the whole number in front of the fraction without any sign can be left.
Ordinary fractional numbers first meet schoolchildren in the 5th grade and accompany them throughout their lives, since in everyday life it is often necessary to consider or use some object not entirely, but in separate pieces. The beginning of the study of this topic - share. Shares are equal parts into which an object is divided. After all, it is not always possible to express, for example, the length or price of a product as an integer; one should take into account parts or shares of any measure. Formed from the verb "to crush" - to divide into parts, and having Arabic roots, in the VIII century the word "fraction" itself appeared in Russian.
Fractional expressions have long been considered the most difficult section of mathematics. In the 17th century, when first textbooks in mathematics appeared, they were called "broken numbers", which was very difficult to display in people's understanding.
The modern form of simple fractional residues, parts of which are separated precisely by a horizontal line, was first promoted by Fibonacci - Leonardo of Pisa. His writings are dated 1202. But the purpose of this article is to simply and clearly explain to the reader how the multiplication of mixed fractions with different denominators occurs.
Multiplying fractions with different denominators
Initially, it is necessary to determine varieties of fractions:
- correct;
- wrong;
- mixed.
Next, you need to remember how fractional numbers with the same denominators are multiplied. The very rule of this process is easy to formulate independently: the result of multiplying simple fractions with the same denominators is a fractional expression, the numerator of which is the product of the numerators, and the denominator is the product of the denominators of these fractions. That is, in fact, the new denominator is the square of one of the existing ones initially.
When multiplying simple fractions with different denominators for two or more factors, the rule does not change:
a/b * c/d = a*c / b*d.
The only difference is that the formed number under the fractional bar will be the product of different numbers and, of course, it cannot be called the square of one numerical expression.
It is worth considering the multiplication of fractions with different denominators using examples:
- 8/ 9 * 6/ 7 = 8*6 / 9*7 = 48/ 63 = 16/2 1 ;
- 4/ 6 * 3/ 7 = 2/ 3 * 3/7 <> 2*3 / 3*7 = 6/ 21 .
The examples use ways to reduce fractional expressions. You can reduce only the numbers of the numerator with the numbers of the denominator; adjacent factors above or below the fractional bar cannot be reduced.
Along with simple fractional numbers, there is the concept of mixed fractions. A mixed number consists of an integer and a fractional part, that is, it is the sum of these numbers:
1 4/ 11 =1 + 4/ 11.
How does multiplication work?
Several examples are provided for consideration.
2 1/ 2 * 7 3/ 5 = 2 + 1/ 2 * 7 + 3/ 5 = 2*7 + 2* 3/ 5 + 1/ 2 * 7 + 1/ 2 * 3/ 5 = 14 + 6/5 + 7/ 2 + 3/ 10 = 14 + 12/ 10 + 35/ 10 + 3/ 10 = 14 + 50/ 10 = 14 + 5=19.
The example uses the multiplication of a number by ordinary fractional part, you can write down the rule for this action by the formula:
a * b/c = a*b /c.
In fact, such a product is the sum of identical fractional remainders, and the number of terms indicates this natural number. Special case:
4 * 12/ 15 = 12/ 15 + 12/ 15 + 12/ 15 + 12/ 15 = 48/ 15 = 3 1/ 5.
There is another option for solving the multiplication of a number by a fractional remainder. Simply divide the denominator by this number:
d* e/f = e/f: d.
It is useful to use this technique when the denominator is divided by a natural number without a remainder or, as they say, completely.
Convert mixed numbers to improper fractions and get the product in the previously described way:
1 2/ 3 * 4 1/ 5 = 5/ 3 * 21/ 5 = 5*21 / 3*5 =7.
This example involves a way to represent a mixed fraction as an improper fraction, it can also be represented as a general formula:
a bc = a*b+ c / c, where the denominator of the new fraction is formed by multiplying the integer part with the denominator and adding it to the numerator of the original fractional remainder, and the denominator remains the same.
This process also works in reverse. To select the integer part and the fractional remainder, you need to divide the numerator of an improper fraction by its denominator with a “corner”.
Multiplication of improper fractions produced in the usual way. When the entry goes under a single fractional line, as necessary, you need to reduce the fractions in order to reduce the numbers using this method and it is easier to calculate the result.
There are many assistants on the Internet to solve even complex mathematical problems in various program variations. A sufficient number of such services offer their help in calculating the multiplication of fractions with different numbers in the denominators - the so-called online calculators for calculating fractions. They are able not only to multiply, but also to perform all other simple arithmetic operations with ordinary fractions and mixed numbers. It is not difficult to work with it, the corresponding fields are filled in on the site page, the sign of the mathematical action is selected and “calculate” is pressed. The program counts automatically.
The topic of arithmetic operations with fractional numbers is relevant throughout the education of middle and senior schoolchildren. In high school, they are no longer considering the simplest species, but integer fractional expressions, but the knowledge of the rules for transformation and calculations, obtained earlier, is applied in its original form. Well-learned basic knowledge gives full confidence in the successful solution of the most complex tasks.
In conclusion, it makes sense to cite the words of Leo Tolstoy, who wrote: “Man is a fraction. It is not in the power of man to increase his numerator - his merits, but everyone can decrease his denominator - his opinion of himself, and by this decrease come closer to his perfection.
