In 1991, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia were the first to leave the USSR. Further, these rather different states, often generalized as the “Baltics,” with varying degrees of success but with similar persistence, followed the path of targeted integration into the Western and European community. This path passed through very painful market and structural reforms and ended with the accession of these countries to the European Union in 2004. Analysis provided by antimif.com.

Many years have passed since that moment. What did the Baltic countries gain from joining the EU? Was it worth it to destroy Soviet industry and torment the weaker sections of the population with painful reforms for years? Those who have visited these countries before and after “shock therapy” know the answer. Among the rest, there are many myths on this score, often fueled by biased media and word of mouth from the genre “my friend’s friend lives in Latvia and told me...”.

The broadcast of these myths is so widespread that two different realities have already formed in people’s heads. In one of them, the Baltic countries, having reformed their economy according to the best standards of developed countries, successfully became one of them and today live richly and happily in a large and friendly European family. The second reality suggests that having destroyed everything good that remained from the Soviet system, collapsing production and driving hundreds of thousands of people onto the streets, the Baltic countries in 2004 became a second-class appendage of the rich EU countries, suitable only as a sales market and a source of cheap labor, without any development prospects. To find the truth, I decided to collect some numbers. And everything immediately became clear.

Population decline

Those who believe that the European choice of the Baltic countries was wrong often point to the massive emigration of people from these countries. The numbers confirm this. The populations of these three countries fell by hundreds of thousands between 2004 and 2016. And although Ukraine and Belarus also experienced colossal population declines during this period (see chart), in percentage terms, Lithuania (-21%) and Latvia (-15%) lost much more.

This is not to say that this is strange. The Baltic states have free entry into the richest countries in the world, where the average salary is several times higher than the local one. In such a situation, mass labor migration looks quite natural. Is this bad for the economy? It depends on who is leaving. When high-quality specialists and managers emigrate, this is certainly a loss for the economy. But if low-skilled workers emigrate, unemployed after the collapse of Soviet industries, who have since swept the streets of Riga for pennies, and who agree to sweep the streets of London for a decent salary, then the economy, on the contrary, benefits from this, because Unemployment and government social spending are reduced, and wage inflation begins in the labor market.

What happened to the economy?

So what happened to the economies of the Baltic countries after joining the EU? The main indicator of the state of the economy is considered to be gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. I decided to compare this indicator in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia in 1996, when “shock therapy” was actively going on, in 2004, when they were admitted to the EU, with the indicator in 2016 (in US dollars).

As we can see, economic growth did not slow down after joining the EU. On the contrary, it has grown many times more than in neighboring countries. Note also how much these countries' economies have grown since the mid-1990s. The following chart sorts by 1996. It is significant that the economies of all countries included in the comparison were then almost at the same level. Poland was the richest. Russia was ahead of Lithuania and Latvia. The green bars immediately make it clear which countries have pursued the most effective economic policies over the past 20 years.

If we take the entire period of time since the collapse of the USSR, then the economic growth of these countries looks like this:

This graph clearly shows the consequences of the global financial crisis of 2007-2013. It can be assumed that the rapid growth of the Baltic economies has almost stopped, and their lag behind the economies of Western Europe has been cemented. The picture looks different if you add one of the Western European countries to the chart. For example, Italy. Why Italy and not, say, the EU average? The fact is that at different points in this period new countries joined the EU, which affected the average, and therefore it is not suitable for objective comparison over time. And I chose Italy because Italy's per capita GDP in 1996 was very close to the EU average.

So, we see that even with very modest growth, the Baltic economies weathered the crisis much better than many other EU countries and continued to close their gap with the richest countries. It is worth noting that if in 1996 the productivity of the Estonian economy was 7 times less than the Italian one, then in 2016 the gap was only 41%. For comparison, Ukraine in 1996 was 25 times behind Italy, and in 2016 - 15 times behind (and almost 9 times behind Estonia). The following graph clearly shows how quickly different countries are closing their gap with Italy.

Now about the fact that they “collapsed production” and after joining the EU “they became a sales market, instead of producing their own.” Look what happened to exports after the Baltic states joined the EU.

As we see, after joining the EU, the foreign trade balance of the Baltic countries, like Poland, has noticeably improved. In simple terms: exports have grown much more than imports. The fact that the balance is negative is quite normal for many developed economies. For example, imports to the United States in 2016 exceeded exports by 43%.

What did people get?

GDP, exports, productivity... How did joining the EU affect household incomes? Let’s compare the average income of the population in 2004 and 2016 (this includes not only salaries, but also pensions, benefits, etc.). As you can see, income does not linearly, but rather consistently follows GDP.

To make it clearer, let’s compare exactly how much the average income of the population increased during this period.

There is also an opinion that “salaries may have increased, but you can’t buy anything with them - everything is very expensive.” In fact, the price level in the Baltic countries 12 years after joining the EU was no higher than that of their southeastern neighbors. Many Belarusians who travel to Vilnius weekly for shopping know this. Many things there, as in Poland, are much cheaper, since joining the WTO and the EU freed them from many import duties that make imported goods more expensive. The graphic below, based on research by the international company Pattaya, compares price levels in different European countries with the average price level in New York.

If you want to be more specific, then let’s see how much milk costs in different countries...

...and housing...

Somehow it doesn’t really intersect with the average income graph, does it? But here we must also take into account that in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine, the utility costs of the population are partially subsidized by the state, and in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, people pay the entire utility bill in full. To more objectively assess the economic situation of the population, I took the average cost of utilities in each country and subtracted it from the average income (2016 data).

As we see, even paying for all services in full and without creating an artificial burden on the country’s budget, the Balts cope no worse than their neighbors.

According to the laws of economics, rapid growth in income leads to a general increase in inflation. However, as can be seen in the following graph, after joining the European Union, inflation in the Baltic countries fell sharply. Moreover, paradoxically, it is significantly less than that of its southeastern neighbors, where incomes are growing much more slowly.

Unemployment in the Baltics and Poland also fell after joining the EU (only in Lithuania it rose slightly). And although everyone is far from Belarus with its 1% (although I, as an economist and employer, consider a moderate level of unemployment necessary for a healthy economy), the Baltic level looks quite normal compared to the EU average (8.5%).

Looking at all the data presented, in my opinion, it is quite obvious that European integration, if not a powerful catalyst for the Baltic economies, at least did no harm. And no matter how much the gloating Kremlin media pumps up about the brain drain, the increase in the number of suicides and alcoholism, the positive development of not only the economy, but also the standard of living of the Baltic states is clearly visible from the rapid increase in average life expectancy in these countries.

So what do the pro-Kremlin media base their conclusions on when they talk about how bad everything became in the Baltic states after European integration? Read their data carefully and you will understand for yourself. Here the Russian newspaper “Vzglyad” writes:

“During independence, the share of industry in the Baltic countries decreased from 23–26 (according to various estimates) percent of GDP in 1995 to 14–20 percent in 2008. The share of transport and communications - from 11-15% in 1995 to 10-13% in 2008, and even the share of agriculture and fishing - from 6-11% in 1995 to 3-4% in 2008 ."

Sounds awful. What does it mean? It doesn't mean anything at all! The share of industry in the US economy in 2016 was 20%, agriculture - 1%. In France - 19% and 2% respectively. And what? Never mind! This is a completely normal proportion for a post-industrial society, where economic growth is primarily due to the service sector. Or there was another one like this on Rubaltic:

Or how do you like this seed in Komsomolskaya Pravda:

“Daria Aslamova tried to understand how one of the most developed Soviet republics, Latvia, having gained independence, became virtually bankrupt after 20 years.”

There is a lot of this kind of misinformation in the Russian-language media, despite the fact that all the data I provided is public, and anyone can check everything if they wish. It turns out that all these writings are intended either for lazy people or idiots. Why is this necessary? Perhaps, then, why did myths once appear about selected Russian children in Norway, or about Russian spirituality, or about the 28 Panfilovites, or about crucified boy …

Remember that the best way to defeat lies is to not let them in.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Source of inspiration/irritation

For more than six years I have not been in the same city for more than three weeks at a time. I take at least four flights a month. I regularly communicate in four different languages ​​with people of many different nationalities. If you start sorting out my 20 closest friends by nationality, then among them there will be Belarusians, Swedes, Germans, Poles, Finns, Russians, Dutch, Israelis, Italians and Australians (I won’t list how many, so as not to offend anyone). In my life, I have visited 169 cities in 40 countries on five continents. I lived in several countries for a long enough time to immerse myself deeply in the life and traditions of these countries.

I was born in the BSSR. In the late 1980s he lived in Nigeria for several years. Then he returned to the already independent country of Belarus. In the late 1990s he moved to Sweden, in the mid-2000s he studied in the Netherlands, and in the early 2010s he lived and worked in the television industry in Russia. Now I work in the Internet field and constantly move between Minsk and Stockholm, alternating these flights with frequent business trips to other cities in Europe and quite rare holidays outside of it.

During my numerous travels, I became more and more convinced of how imperfect the information and cultural space in different countries is, biased and filled with myths about themselves, about their countries and about the world around them, which often have very little in common with reality.

Through word of mouth and social networks, a small exaggeration or distortion quickly develops into a major lie, which, once people believe it, begins to look for confirmation in everything, so as not to admit their mistake. This is how different worldview paradigms are created. Once in one of them, it is very difficult to then jump to another without completely changing your perception of reality.

Goals of the Antimyth

The existence on the same planet, or even in the same society, of different ideas about what is happening in it certainly carries with it a potential danger. Misunderstandings between people often lead to irritation, mistrust and potential conflicts. So, for example, there is a well-known myth in the world about the existence of the so-called “Islamic world”. Some Muslims who believe in this myth and consider themselves part of it are convinced that the Islamic world is in a state of holy war with another myth called the “Western World,” which allegedly imposes Christian values ​​alien to them on Muslims of all countries and denigrates everything holy. These myths become a justification for terrorist acts, which in turn give rise to new myths about the aggressiveness of Muslims and the danger of dictatorial regimes in Muslim countries, which in turn lead to military interventions in these countries, which in turn are regarded by some Muslims as an attack by Christians on Islam and further strengthens the myth of the holy war between Christian and Islamic civilizations.

I created the Anti-Myth because I could no longer tolerate this endless labeling and inflating of completely absurd and harmful social myths into dogma. First of all, in Antimyth I will expose myths that create hatred between people and fuel conflicts and intolerance. My goal is to restore the most objective picture of any circumstance and expose the sources of bias. All my entries are based on the following principles:

• objectivity is an end in itself for any self-respecting person;
• bias is not a lie, but it is no better than a lie;
• all beliefs and opinions are subjective; Only circumstances can be objective;
• any beliefs have the right to exist in conditions of equal competition of opinions;
• the concepts of “good”, “evil”, “right”, “wrong”, “appropriate”, “inappropriate”, “morality”, “morality” are a subjective social construct that requires constant re-evaluation;
• any statement can be considered valid only if there is a convincing and comprehensive answer to the question “why?” or “why?”;

At the same time, it is worth recognizing that no one can be 100% objective in all matters, and therefore I immediately want to voice the potential sources of my own bias. I am a social liberal and cosmopolitan. I consider personal freedom a fundamental human value. In my ideal world there are no states or borders, and the main role of society is to help each person realize their individual potential, and not limit it with norms and dogmas. For me, such phenomena as conservatism, nationalism and the imposition of any ideals on society, including religious ones, are unacceptable. I understand and respect those who consider some things sacred and unshakable (the word of God, traditions, homeland). However, I reserve the right to critique any dogma that does not stand up to the question “why?” or "why?" Of course, I also reserve the right to express my own opinions in my articles. But if you saw an objective error or distortion of facts in one of the articles, please immediately inform me about it at master[barking animal]antimif[punctuation mark]com, indicating the source of reliable information. I am not inclined to enter into empty polemics of different opinions, and I do not advise you to.

And one more thing: I like to joke sometimes. Sometimes it's even tough. My philosophy is that you can joke about anything. I don't like political correctness, and I don't advise you to abuse it. However, I do not allow rudeness, insults against specific people and unfounded accusations like “you were paid to write this.” And since we are talking about this, I would like to immediately assure you that no one is paying me for this writing. Antimyth is my personal blog, which I maintain with my own honestly earned money, and I do not cooperate with any organizations in this matter.

If you would like to discuss the Antimyth articles, you can do so at

So much has already been said about the protests of the spring of 2017 that the brain is leaking out of the ears. Mikhail Sender, director of Kufar and author of the Antimyth blog, will put a logical point on the issue on KYKY (yes, it’s his articles “where does so much cynicism come from in our people” that we read). “The worst thing that could happen today, even from the point of view of Belarusian patriots, is the overthrow of the Lukashenko regime,” explains Mikhail.

Question No. 1. Why was there excessive government aggression towards the demonstrators on the 25th?

It’s strange to me that anyone expected a different development of events, if not the ones that happened. Everything was leading up to this. The authorities made it clear that there was no point in going out, that there would be serious consequences. What else could you expect?

Our government has been trying to carry out certain liberal reforms for the last couple of years, mainly in the economy. The opposition-minded population is not particularly affected. All this is simply due to the critical need for the survival of the government itself. There is no longer any financial support from Russia. A self-sufficient economy has not been built in 25 years of independence. There are no other financial sources - bridges with all other civilized countries have been burned. In such a situation, there is no other way out than to carry out reforms.

Mikhail Sender, photo from FB

Probably some people, great enthusiasts and romantics, took this as some kind of transformation and an opportunity to finally move to a democratic society. Which, it seems to me, were naive illusions. I myself am an idealist by nature, but it seems to me that it was absolutely obvious that there would be no transformation.
It is necessary, of course, to differentiate between the opposition leaders and the people who came out to be indignant at the adopted decree on parasitism. There are those who came out because they were upset and angry. And there were those who tried to lead this protest, to take advantage of some opportunity. People who were offended can be understood - emotions were at play in them. What did the opposition leaders hope for in this situation? What result did they want? This is debatable.

Question No. 2. What further government actions will follow after these events, and is it necessary to bury the attempt at liberalization?

I will say something that is not the most popular among Democrats. I really hope that these events will not frighten off the authorities and redirect their thinking into an even more authoritarian and forceful direction. From all points of view, this would be the most unpleasant scenario for society, for the authorities, for the opposition, and for the democrats.

What situation are we in today? The opposition is very weak. Democratic ideals do not enjoy very broad popular support. Trying to “rock the boat” in a situation where the country is not ruled by a democratic leader, but by a person who is trying to somehow sit and hold on in this “boat” at any cost, can be fraught with much more dangerous consequences than sitting in it with him .

Question No. 3. Are there any external forces to “rock the boat” in Belarus?

I thought about this myself several times. I don’t know the correct answer, but my guess is: most likely, it happened spontaneously. As I said, the opposition leaders tried to take advantage of the moment of popular indignation, which was, so to speak, not very widespread. Although this was probably the most widespread indignation that our opposition movement has seen in the last ten years. Naturally, the opposition leaders were greatly inspired by this.
I do not think that there was any external influence here, but I am convinced that it would have taken place if these events had begun to develop in a different direction. If these protests had not been suppressed, if they had begun to develop into something more serious, then, I am sure, external influence would have made itself felt.

And I’m glad that there was no external influence, because there could have been a different scenario. Same as in 2010. That’s when I’m inclined to believe that there was an influence after all. I would really not like the country to be thrown back 7 years in development. So that we can close ourselves off from the world again. I would like to preserve all those attempts to develop towards a healthy market economy. Let them be carried out slowly, gradually, carefully and contrary to the completely conservative-Soviet policy of the head of state, his ideology and, in principle, mentality. But at least the movement is finally moving in the right direction.

What has the government, or at least the Foreign Office, achieved? Belarusian officials - maybe they are opportunists? At least some success. They brought more benefits in comparison with what could be achieved and what the opposition movement achieved during that period. This is probably a very unpopular and politically incorrect thing for a democrat, which I am, and I say this not at all as a reproach to the opposition, because until recently the opposition simply did not have any real influence on the system.

But even if you are an ardent nationalist, a devout patriot. Let's reason. What geopolitical situation is Belarus in today? Nearby there is a dangerous neighbor with completely manic imperial sentiments and ambitions. Nearby there is that regime and that information propaganda that takes place on Russian TV channels, which, by the way, are watched by the majority of the population of Belarus. In such a situation, the worst thing that could happen today, even from the point of view of Belarusian patriots, is the overthrow of the Lukashenko regime.

Question No. 4. How to find a common language between society and the state now

Society is a broad concept. It depends on who you mean. If we talk about ordinary people, I believe that relatively good channels of communication and influence of the “little man” on the authorities have already been set up in Belarus. Considering the possibilities of an ordinary person to influence, sue, complain about some official or government agency, speaking about the protection of consumer rights, we see that in Belarus, in principle, everything is not so bad. Of course, with the caveat that corruption is very developed, that there is clanism in power, and certain bastions that will crush any citizen. But in comparison with neighboring countries, everything is not so scary.

As for fundamental changes: I believe that now there is an excellent window of opportunity for those who want to significantly influence the development of the country. Working in business, I see that there is a very active search for solutions and proposals from different ministries. Letters arrive in a very funny form, typical of our officials, but, nevertheless, there are requests: “Please bring suggestions! Proposals from the business community to improve the investment climate are accepted.” That is, there is an active search for solutions. Moreover, obviously, now there is not enough competence and competence in government circles to solve economic problems. That’s why I say that the doors are open, the authorities have tuned their ears. And, despite the fact that the most important holder of power is critically conservative and constantly mentions in his rhetoric that there will be no reforms, we see that over the last two years reforms have actually been taking place. Moreover, quite significant.

This is probably the ideal scenario from Lukashenko’s point of view. Ideal in the very difficult situation in which he now finds himself: when he needs to look for money, but no one brings it in the bag. The essence of the scenario: to carry out market reforms that will gradually activate the economy, while in the short term worsening the standard of living of the population, which will certainly follow. And at the same time constantly talk about the fact that there will be no reforms. This has been going on for some time, and then these protests begin.

Playing a double game: saying that there will be no reforms and at the same time carrying them out is incredibly difficult. But it is much more difficult to continue to lead it when at the same time you have popular protests raging in the streets.

Therefore, as a business man, as a person who wants the best for the country, and as a liberal democrat, I want to hope that this country will one day become civilized, developed and democratic. I really hope that this experiment will work out. I would really like civil society to compromise (I won’t say with its conscience, but at least with its emotions) and try to think not one step, but two or three steps ahead.

Question No. 5. What can you do (and think) in this situation?

If you take a crowbar and destroy everything now, nothing good will come of it. It is important to understand one very important thing that many Belarusian opposition leaders do not understand or do not want to talk about: living in a police state, power can only be maintained by controlling the power bloc.

Even if the authorities had not gone to suppress the action. Even if the protests began to grow (although I don’t think that would happen: the level of paranoia is too high - rather, the protests would gradually die out on their own). Even if the protests continued to grow, despite the fact that it was said: “We are for peaceful reforms” (here you can argue: why organize demonstrations if they are for peaceful ones? What do you want to achieve? What, will the government leave on its own? Most likely not will leave. Not this one, at least). Even if some kind of “Maidan” had happened and the government had changed. What would happen the next day? It seems to me that this analysis is very much missing from those who are trying to lead all these movements and protests.

Suppose you take power, even for a day. How do you keep it in a country where society is permeated with Russian propaganda? In a country where there are security forces, of which there are a lot. Who have been trained and taught for 25 years that they need to kill the BPF members. Which conduct exercises together with Russian troops. Which are tailored to Soviet thinking. Nationalist democrats come to power, and what will the security forces do? These hundred thousand people in uniform? What will they say on all these Russian channels that all of them and their relatives watch? Most likely, they will say that a junta has come to power and that the fraternal people need to be saved. And who will these security forces in uniform protect? “Rescuers” or intellectuals speaking in Belarusian language and talking about the heritage of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania? I think this strategic thinking is missing. Analysis of what will happen in two steps.

I would really like there to be some kind of romantic scenario, a romantic ending. So that the whole society simply blossoms with tenderness that we have finally been saved, we have been freed.

But I am afraid that such a scenario would only be possible if there was now a leadership in Russia that could look completely passively at the events in the neighboring country. Which, obviously, will not happen under the current Kremlin regime. They (I’m talking about the Kremlin, I have a very good attitude towards the peoples of Russia) consider Belarus as their territory of interests. The Kremlin government today is quite obviously committed to confrontation and to spreading its influence in the world, and they will not allow a quiet change of power in a neighboring country, except to a government that is even more pro-Kremlin than the current one.

You can read more thoughts from Mikhail Sender on his blog Antimyth.

If you notice an error in the text, select it and press Ctrl+Enter

And here is the new hero of our column “In blog and trust!” Meet: today with us is Michael Sender - he raised “Kufar”, and also fought and is fighting modern myths as part of his blog Antimif.com.

A conversation about Belarus, about its troubled eastern neighbor, about Russophobia (imaginary and real) and, of course, about the myths that are born around us for the same purpose why they were invented thousands of years ago - to fool everyone’s brains. But today’s myths are no longer as harmless as they once were - now they are a weapon of propaganda and a way to pit entire nations against each other... In general, it was a thorough conversation!

— Mikhail, in Belarus you are known as the head of the “Kufar” advertising platform, but in the world you are still probably better known as an irreconcilable fighter against myths — within the framework of your blog Antimif.com. So how is the fight against fakes and “post-truth” going?

— To be honest, in the last year I took a break from blogging, because major life changes required a lot of attention and concentration. I left Kufar, moved to Sweden and just recently headed the Swedish marketplace Comprado. This is my second move to Sweden from Belarus in 20 years, so history repeats itself, as usually happens in everything.

— Mikhail Sender—is he still a Belarusian or is he already a “man of the world”? In your blog you write that you have been living “out of suitcases” for a long time, but, apparently, you follow closely the events in your native country. By the way, what latest news from Belarus excited you the most?

— I am a supporter of the currently unpopular opinion that people are born Belarusians first of all. And only then they become whoever they want. So I was born a Belarusian. This cannot be changed. But by conviction I am a cosmopolitan, and therefore I consider generalizing people based on nationality to be a secondary thing and quite useless. More often than not, even harmful. At the same time, it is difficult for me to remain indifferent to events in Belarus, if only because the fact of my birth there makes Belarus an integral part of my personality and reputation. Therefore, I follow Belarusian news every day, hoping that it will get better.

There has been more and more good news lately, which is good news. The authorities, although with a delay of 25 years, are finally beginning to adapt to objective reality and are finally beginning to try to gradually lead the country out of the deadlock.

Of the latest news, two were most excited: the 100th anniversary of the BPR and the film “The Death of Stalin”. There was a fear that both might be banned. Thank God, both cases worked out.

Blogger Maxim Mirovich. About Russophobia, “soviet” and LiveJournal, which is alive

At a time when lies, distortion of facts and “alternative truths” have become not just the norm, but also the defining policy of individual countries, it has become very difficult to find a source of information that you trust. Therefore, you have to go to “private traders” - bloggers who create information content with their own hands.

— Blogger Maxim Mirovichin an interview with us very accurately described the essence of the term “Russophobe”: “it was created entirely artificially and is intended to disguise the true message of the texts of certain authors. And the point, as a rule, is to criticize the authorities, but not to criticize the Russians as a nation - this is a fundamental difference.” Do you agree with this statement? And are you called a Russophobe for your publications?

— I agree that this term is often used incorrectly by people who do not understand the difference between the people, the state and the government. Many people do not understand that a state can have several peoples (the Russian Federation is a striking example of this), that the government can be anti-state (example: the government of the RSFSR during the collapse of the USSR) or anti-people (example: Apartheid in South Africa), that the people or part of them can be against the government (example: any country before a change of government), or against the state, but for anti-state power (example: Catalonia, DPR, Transnistria). You can be Russian and love the Russian people and culture with all your heart, but hate the Russian Federation as a state or its government. Or you can adore the Russian Federation and Putin, but hate Russians in general. The latter phenomenon is often found among representatives of some peoples of the Russian Federation. Is this Russophobia? In my understanding, yes. It really exists, but it has nothing to do with power and the state.

You can be Russian and love the Russian people and culture with all your heart, but hate the Russian Federation as a state or its government

Russophobia is hatred of everything Russian (not Russian) - culture, language, traditions. It is found both among Russians themselves and among representatives of other nations. And criticism of the modern state of Russia and its authorities is not Russophobia, but a civic position, just like criticism of any other state. I was accused of Russophobia many times for this. What have I been accused of...

— In general, how do people react to your articles? What is more in the comments - anger or understanding?

— It seems to me that in principle, negativity always predominates in comments. To write a comment, a person needs emotional motivation. Negative emotions are more motivating than humble understanding. That’s why I rarely see comments like “I understand you!” But when you see that your article has been shared 5,000 times, 100 hateful comments don't really upset you.

— Since 2014 (conditionally) we have a new Russia. Senior (in relation to Belarus) the brother suddenly crawled out of his den and again began to threaten the whole world, as in the Soviet years. These periods of aggression, are they simply the essence of the nature of Russian people, or are they a consequence of the policies of the country’s authorities?

— The “Russian person” does not have any special nature. There is the upbringing and influence of a society in which, for various reasons, over generations a cult of strength and a positive image of great power were formed. After the collapse of the Soviet empire and the failure to form a normally functioning market democracy in the place of the former RSFSR, these values ​​instilled by society gave rise to a complex of national inferiority, resentment and shame for the homeland in many Russians. And this, against the backdrop of hopelessness for a better life, gave rise to revanchism and hatred of the winners of the Cold War.

The policies of today's Russian government, like any right-wing populist government, only channel these sentiments in a direction that is beneficial to it in order to consolidate itself and take its eyes off the deplorable state into which the oligarchy that actually rules it has driven the country. A more detailed answer to this question in satirical fable form can be read in my short story “The Tale of How the Bear Got Up from His Knees,” which can be downloaded for free at antimif.com.

— Presidential elections in Russia. Or - “elections”. It seems that it would be none of our business, the Belarusians, if only Russia were not at our side and did not influence Belarus so much. What do you think will happen after Putin’s re-election? (after all, he will win, right?)

— It’s unlikely that anything will change much. Putin himself does not need this. The concern is rather how controlled Russian society will be after many years of treatment with right-wing chauvinist propaganda, and what this chauvinism can result in, regardless of Putin’s interests.

Russia's neighbors have many reasons to worry. These sentiments are painfully reminiscent of popular revanchism in Germany, humiliated and impoverished after the lost war of the late 1920s.

- Let's make a kind of hit parade of myths. Name the Top 5 most popular myths grown in the post-Soviet space and which are still popular today. And the Top 5 myths that WILL dominate in the minds of people completely corrupted by state propaganda.

— I will answer for Belarus, because I know less about the other parts of this “space” (see below).

Myth 3: The Great Patriotic War. This is a blasphemous attempt by Soviet ideologists to formalize the period of the most terrible war in the history of mankind, which began immediately after the USSR divided Eastern Europe with Hitler's Germany, and ended with the countries “liberated” by the Soviets turning into communist vassals of the USSR with puppet rulers controlled from Moscow . This attempt has been successfully cultivated in Belarus to this day. Despite the fact that almost half of the modern territory of Belarus was forcibly annexed to the BSSR after the invasion of Poland by Soviet troops in 1939, and that as a result of the victory of the USSR, Nazi terror in this territory was replaced by Stalin’s terror, we still call the denouement of this terrible war "our great victory." My articles on this topic: “70 years of the victory of Great Germany over the Soviet-Bolshevik invaders”, “Whose victory are we celebrating on May 9? "

Myth 4: Belarus is a social state, while the rest of Europe is dominated by brutal capitalism. Many Belarusians, for example, do not realize how different the systems of government on our continent are from each other, and how different European states as a whole are from the American model known throughout the world. There are much more socially oriented states in Europe than Belarus, and Belarus, in turn, is ahead of many countries in terms of market liberalism in some areas. For example, in Scandinavian countries, all education (from primary to higher education) is free. And there is not a single country in the European Union where (thanks to the contract system) it is as easy for an employer to fire an unwanted employee as in Belarus.

Myth 5: Bracket = smiley face. I don’t know where this habit came from among Belarusians (the Russophobe in me tells me that it’s 100% Russian), but if you don’t put a colon before a parenthesis in correspondence with a foreigner, then no one will perceive your parentheses, no matter how many there are, as a smile , but they will simply think that you have problems with encoding or punctuation.

State propaganda fuels a whole flora of new myths, the common denominator of which is cynicism and the denial of noble human values ​​as such.

It’s difficult to talk about myths of the future. I am afraid that all of the myths listed will live on for a long time, including thanks to state propaganda, which once chose the Soviet legacy as its ideological basis. However, state propaganda also fuels a whole flora of new myths, the common denominator of which is cynicism and the denial of noble human values ​​as such. By throwing mud at everyone and everything, throwing accusations like “someone pays them all”, “just to destabilize society”, “this is all for self-promotion” and so on, for years the authorities have discredited both themselves and the opposition, and human rights activists, and in general everyone who tried to do something good. This creates fertile ground for a paranoid worldview and belief in a variety of conspiracy theories that propagandists can throw at society. Unfortunately, this is now happening all over the world. My articles on this topic: “Where do our people have so much cynicism? ", "European jingoists".

— Is it possible to live outside of myths or stereotypes imposed on us in the media? To live without relying on “post-truth” or other people’s deliberately erroneous opinions? Or is this impossible in the Internet era?

— The very formulation of the question scares me, implying that without the Internet there would be fewer risks of falling for post-truth. I really don’t want to think that humanity is so infantile that with wider and more pluralistic access to information it becomes more knowledgeable than with just one radio point. I believe that this is a matter of education and upbringing. If we teach our children to think critically, always check sources and never rush to conclusions, then mass psychosis will not threaten society.

"Renegades and Traitors." Story one. Anton

Why do Belarusians leave the country? The answer seems obvious - for a better life. That is, for normal work, good wages, reasonable laws, adequate police, and so on. But it's not that simple. Sometimes people leave their native abode simply because they are tired of everything. Even when they move to places that can hardly be called better - in relation to their home country, first of all.

— You live permanently in Europe. Can you create a collective image of a Belarusian through the eyes of an average European?

— With this question, you hit the bull’s eye of my favorite myth (see Myth 2 above). All Belarusians (except for intercontinental emigrants) live in Europe and are no more different from the “average European”, if it is even possible to characterize him in any way, than the Swedes, Portuguese or Serbs. But if we talk about certain national characteristics of Belarusians, less typical for other Europeans, then I would highlight a completely anomalous idea of ​​their own identity, formed by myth No. 1 described above.

When abroad, Belarusians often talk about themselves from the position of a representative of not just a small country in Eastern Europe, but of some space incomprehensible to foreigners, which in our heads is called “post-Soviet”. Once, a Swede, having learned that I was from Belarus, told me: “Listen, I have a friend, also from Belarus, and when she tells something, she sometimes says “here in Russia.” I once asked her why she said that, because she is from Belarus. And she replied that it was, like, the same thing. I still don't understand how this is so. Can you explain?" Well, try to explain...

Belarusians have such a national peculiarity - to think that they seem to live in some other space than the country of which they are citizens. I have not seen this among representatives of other European countries. Otherwise, Belarusians do not differ much in behavior from other Eastern Europeans. Well, perhaps only increased tolerance for neglect of one’s own rights. We were trained for 26 years under batons. Well, many simply do not know that in other countries democracy really works and votes actually count, and that this is not just an invention of “oppositionists paid for by the insidious West.”

— Returning to Minsk, what changes in this city surprise, irritate, or delight you most? And, remembering Woland’s words - are Belarusians changing? internally?

— In general, I am very pleased with how rapidly Minsk is changing right before our eyes. Just 5-10 years ago it was, perhaps, the most gloomy and boring capital of Europe. And now there’s no shame in inviting a foreigner here for the weekend (luckily visas have been cancelled). Excellent nightlife has appeared, many high-quality and inexpensive by European standards restaurants and cafes with good service, decent hotels have appeared, normal taxi services, Uber, and, in the end, shopping centers, which are not a shame. The development of the historical center is also encouraging in comparison with Soviet times (Chizh’s projects do not count). And people change for the better. Young people are mostly well dressed and behave decently. Not what it was in the nineties.

The old generation is still lagging behind. I would say that the cultural gap between generations in Belarus is much larger than in many other European countries. The average 18-year-old Belarusian teenager is no different in appearance and habits from a Hungarian, German or English one. But you definitely won’t confuse a 70-year-old grandmother with an English peer. Moreover (and this is my personal observation), in contrast to global trends, I would say that in Belarus teenagers, on average, are much kinder, more polite and more cultured than older people. This makes us happy and gives us hope for the future of the country.

— How do you see your blog, say, in five years? Do you have enough passion to continue your business? There are definitely enough myths!

- Don't know. I, like Ostap Bender, tend to often change the role of activity and hobby. I do not exclude that the format may change, say, to a podcast or video blog. I’m also thinking about starting a blog in English for a wider audience. I really want to write a book. But I also really love life and all its delights, so it’s always difficult to devote myself to such labor-intensive and non-income-generating activities when there are so many interesting and pleasant things to do. It's a constant battle between the heart and the butt, and as you age, your butt tends to get bigger and heavier.

— Which Belarusian bloggers do you read? Do you follow the blogosphere in Belarus in general? And in general, do you think there is anyone to read from among the “nashens”, from among those who are passionate about politics and “Russophobia”?

- Oh, if I also read others, then when would I write? :) I follow the blogosphere mainly on Twitter and Facebook, but I don’t read anyone regularly. I have a lot of respect for Anton Motolko, Viktor Malishevsky, I follow Palchis on Twitter, but it’s difficult to read him (although I share his emotions, I prefer a more balanced form of presentation with at least a symbolic claim to objectivity). I really like reading Yulia Chernyavskaya’s thoughts. I love the Facebook feed of Yuri Zisser and Vladimir Maksimkov.

— At the end of our interview, let's talk about good things!

- Let's. Everything will be fine!

Concert of the Dreamgale group at the STV Star Ring.

The Dreamgale group was founded by Belarusians Dmitry Palagin and Mikhail Sender, who emigrated to Sweden at different times. The band's first album, Memories in Dark Crystal, brought great popularity. Their music is known not only in Belarus and Sweden, but also in the Scandinavian countries, the Baltic states, and Russia. By the very name, which translates as “storm of dreams,” the participants declare that they can pick up the listener and take him into the world of dreams.

Nina Bogdanova:
Do you really think you make world-class music?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
Certainly.

Nina Bogdanova:
Is Dreamgale a hobby or a job for you?

:
For us this is the meaning of life.

Nina Bogdanova:
Does the meaning of life bring material income?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
It brings, but, unfortunately, very small. Therefore, for the sake of money we do something boring, but for the soul we are Dreamgale.

Spectator from the audience:
You position yourself as pure creators, but what do you do for a living?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
Each of us has our own separate projects. I am engaged in the television business, producing television programs, Dima is a systems engineer, Emma is engaged in web business, online products. We live like ordinary people and earn our bread, and the rest of the time we do what we love most.

Spectator from the audience:
You note that your work was influenced by such groups as Enigma, Roxette. Their work was very original, and some of your songs resemble a mix from the past. This is true?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
Maybe yes. We have a lot of nostalgia in our music, we use elements of pop music from the 80s and 90s. We like it and we combine it with something new.

Spectator from the audience:
Don't you want to create more of your own?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
I think that's what we're doing, it's just impossible to create something completely new without building on what already exists. We don’t need to completely reinvent the wheel every time, we don’t want that.

Dmitry Wrangel:
Are the costumes you are wearing now rented, or did you make them for performances?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
They are rolled, partially sewn. We combine and experiment every time. It would be expensive to sew something new for every performance.

Spectator from the audience:
Are you afraid of going too far with your mystical interests?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
Dissolve into oblivion? Transform into some kind of spirits? No, it seems to me that you can’t go too far with mysticism. As long as we are made of atoms and molecules, I think we can experiment with mysticism as much as we like.

Spectator from the audience:
I meant psychologically?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
Will we go crazy? Maybe we’ll get off, maybe we’ll get off today.

Spectator from the hall:
Many of your compositions would be suitable as soundtracks for thriller films. Have you received such offers?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
No. This is a very complex industry, the big dream of any composer is to write a track for a major and serious film. Unfortunately, this is very high competition.

Spectator from the audience:
Judging by your music, you probably like vampire movies?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
We have been told this more than once. Not so much about vampires, we just love horror movies. In fact, we love anything that makes our skin crawl, anything that makes us feel uncomfortable in a dark room. This atmosphere inspires us the most.

Spectator from the audience:
You, like many modern bands, decided not to release your albums on discs, but to distribute them via the Internet. Do you suffer from this commercially?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
We don’t suffer because no one buys CDs today. Our goal is to bring our music to the listener, and if we sell 2-3 or 20 thousand copies, then this will not be the income for which we should work. We work for pleasure.

Dmitry Vranegl:
You constantly cross your arms over your stomach. Is this some kind of symbolism, are you closing yourself off from the public?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
No, I just haven’t liked touching dry tissue since childhood.

Dmitry Vranegl:
What other phobias do you have?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
I don't really like touching frogs or being in the same room with them.

Dmitry Wrangel:
Could you translate the name of your group into Russian, then sing some of the songs not in English, but in Russian, setting it to a Belarusian tune?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
Is it possible in Belarusian? The name of the group is “Wind of Dreams”. (sings in Belarusian - editor's note)

Spectator from the audience:
In one of your interviews you said that love songs are meaningless nonsense. Maybe you've never loved?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
Probably, on the contrary, he loved too much to punish himself by singing about love.

Spectator from the audience:
You promote the idea of ​​interactive music creation with your listeners. Are you unable to cope on your own or just want to attract attention?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
It was an experiment, we invited our listeners to make adjustments as we created the song. They could leave comments on our website. We laid out the composition in parts, and gradually it grew into such an interactive result, this is a very labor-intensive and long process, it’s difficult to please everyone, so I’m not sure that we will repeat this further. We were very interested in trying it ourselves.

Spectator from the audience:
You calmly and monotonously answer all questions. Are you different from what you are now?

Mikhail Sender (Dreamgale group):
I am a calm person, it is difficult to outrage me, but there are certain points that can be pressed, but I will never tell you about it.

It’s a rare top manager who walks 10 kilometers, works at a desk in a standing position, looks for extremely spicy dishes in cafes, and on weekends finds the strength to fly to his fiancée in Stockholm. The hero of the My Working Day website project was the founder of the largest advertising platform Kufar, Mikhail Sender, who destroyed stereotypes about how company heads live and work.

Help website. Mikhail Sender was born in Belarus, spent his early childhood in Nigeria, grew up in Sweden, and studied in the Netherlands. In high school, he created a rock band with his friends, but did not make money from music. After studying at Stockholm University and the Stockholm School of Economics, he worked in different countries. It was under his leadership that “Kufar” was launched, which in a couple of years turned from a small site into the largest advertising platform. In 2018, he left the company and moved to Stockholm to devote more time to his fiancee and take on new projects.

“I walk for health, I compose music for the soul”

Mikhail meets us in the living room of the Stalin building near Victory Square. A modest but well-kept apartment reveals its owner in the smallest details. Musical instruments, Swedish books, and above the bed there is a huge painting of Venice with gondolas. “This is where I proposed to my fiancée. We were sailing on a gondola along the Grand Canal, I got down on my knee, took out the ring - everything was like in a fairy tale,” the interlocutor confesses.

In the bedroom, the electric piano attracts attention - not everyone can play it.

— Music has a meditative effect on me, sometimes I just want to play. I don’t seem to be a vain person, but I only perform my own compositions, which I have been composing since I was 12 years old. It was always uninteresting to play someone else’s stuff,” says Mikhail. — A couple of years ago there was an opportunity to try something of my own, but I decided that it was not the time and I had already become a slightly different person. Now I’m not going to make music professionally - rather, it’s a need of the soul.

Next to the bed on the floor there is a retro TV and radio - stylish “guests” from the Soviet past:

— The TV looks like something from the 70s, but was actually released in the 90s. It is, of course, black and white. I took him from my grandfather’s dacha, and he was still a flea dealer,” recalls Mikhail. — The radio is also not as old as it seems. They were produced until the late 80s, although their design remained in the 70s. Now this one looks like a rarity.

We draw your attention to the 12-kilogram dumbbells that are “hidden” behind the sofa. “You have to be on your toes. Lately I’ve been working out several times a week,” explains the interlocutor.

Mikhail says that he lives in constant motion and prefers to do without a car. For example, one gets to the office from home and back (which is about 2 km in each direction) on foot. In total, he walks about 10 km per day - the fitness tracker regularly shows 15-20 thousand steps.

“There are no problems with “earning” yourself dinner,” the top manager jokes. — In general, you need to take care of yourself, make sure you move actively. In Scandinavia, a healthy lifestyle has long been a trend. It is also cultivated in large companies. The same fashion is coming to Belarus.

Walking to work and adapting to a global world

And now Mikhail invites us to go down the stairs and walk to the Upper Town. While we are walking along the avenue, we are talking about the “difficulties of translation” between Belarusians and Swedes.

— In Sweden, almost everyone speaks English. It is also taught at the university. Specialists are being prepared for the fact that we live in a global world. Fluency in English is a hygiene factor. Swedes have been watching Hollywood films and TV series in the original form since early childhood. And they can’t even imagine that it could be any other way.

According to Mikhail, “if society does not teach people English, it “sews up” specialists within its economy and blocks their exchange.”

“In addition, at some point we will have to bring very expensive expats with the necessary competencies into the country. And then the national economy will lose in global competition. And people's wages will remain low.

Many of Mikhail Sender’s classmates found work in the USA and Great Britain - Scandinavians generally migrate willingly. Sweden is also open to expats - it accepts people even more than it gives away. “Companies can recruit employees from any country; nationality is not important to them - they look at resumes and competencies. In the offices of international companies, knowing Swedish is not so important. For example, in the Schibsted media concern, which owns the Kufar advertising platform, the main language is English,” notes the top manager.

Belarusians and Swedes also differ in their attitude to life, Mikhail believes. He wonders why Belarusians wait on the state instead of opening their own business and earning much more.

— It is very profitable to do business in Belarus. You can register an individual entrepreneur in one day, and taxes under the “simplified” system are low - only 5% of revenue. You won't find this in other European countries. Where the country lags behind is in technology and business models, the interlocutor believes. — First of all, you need to learn how to promote goods and services. In the Internet age, many entrepreneurs are stuck offline. To make them closer to customers, we at one time launched online storefronts with everything ready - so that the user would register on the site today and submit an ad, and tomorrow he would receive the first interested customers. Gradually the situation is changing for the better.

Mikhail believes that the lack of experience and knowledge also hinders Belarusians. In his opinion, people are afraid to start something of their own and take risks, and good ideas often disappear due to doubts.

“Many people in the country didn’t really learn how to run a business—everything was learned through personal mistakes.” And then it worked. However, times are changing: new technologies are coming, competition is increasing. Those who worked the old fashioned way risk being left out of work,” the interlocutor shrugs. “Fortunately, they started to get help.” For example, we recently launched the “Kufarization” project, with which we went to the regions. Everyone could listen to lectures for free, get advice on taxes and play a quiz that we developed together with BrainSlaughter, and at the same time win a prize for business development. In my opinion, if large and medium-sized businesses care about the economy, they should help budding entrepreneurs. Because without them, Belarusians will never be rich.

The interlocutor suddenly stops near the bridge and shows us decorative vases.

- Just look! We painted it not long ago, but the paint has already peeled off. In a year everything will repeat according to the same scenario. It amazes me that fences, bridges, etc. have to be repainted every year for state or municipal money. And also the tiles on the sidewalks, which buzzed the ears of everyone I knew. Why is there so much of it? - Mikhail is surprised. — After all, more than half of rural roads are not asphalted. That is, money goes to tiles even where people don’t go, although instead normal infrastructure could be created in the countryside.

“I am an extreme eater. The spicier the better for me."

On the way we stop into a cozy cafe for breakfast. The waitress, seeing Mikhail, immediately offers a buffet and receives an approving nod. A few minutes later there are a couple of pieces of ham, sausages, cheesecakes and a spoonful of Olivier on the table. A minute later the cappuccino arrives.

— I can afford more in a cafe. But at home you have to save money on breakfast - there’s no time for it. “I either make quick oatmeal with raisins, or some kind of cereal with milk, and very rarely scrambled eggs,” our interlocutor admits.

But when Mikhail finds himself in Stockholm, “breakfast turns into a festive ritual”:

— There are people for whom breakfast is the main meal of the day. For example, for Emelie, my fiancee. She spends a lot of time preparing everything, placing 7-8 plates on the table, and arranging the food beautifully.

A top manager drinks a lot of coffee - he explains this as a placebo effect:

“I convince myself that he cheers me up.” In fact, this is an excuse to move around a little: walk around the office, see what’s going on, talk, change the environment.

Mikhail is a big fan of southeastern cuisine, and he also cannot live without spicy food.

— There’s a real shortage of spicy dishes. I'm generally extreme in this regard. I sometimes take food according to the principle: the spicier, the better. If an Indian restaurant has a dish that says it's the spiciest dish in the country or city, that's a sure sign to me that I have to try it. Although in Minsk there are practically no cafes and restaurants where they can cook truly spicy dishes, the interlocutor admits.

Once, his passion for spicy food almost played a cruel joke on Mikhail. It was in the center of Stockholm - at a kiosk with hot dogs.

— This hot dog is known throughout the country and is called hara-kiri. The shop owners claim that this is the hottest hot dog in the world, and I readily believe it. There's even a challenge: whoever eats this hot dog in less than a minute and doesn't drop anything gets a T-shirt and is added to the favorites list. True, before this they force you to sign a contract that they do not guarantee the consequences,” says Mikhail. - So, when I tried it, it seemed to me that the end of the world had come. The chili, of which there is already a lot, became even hotter after heating. A minute passed - and a terrible trembling began throughout my body, although I had only eaten a third. Then apathy set in, I was shaking and feverish. I won't recommend it to anyone.

But Mikhail doesn’t miss Swedish dishes while in Minsk. The national cuisine of the region is specific and not for everybody. Many rare dishes are rooted in tradition, but ordinary Swedes are hesitant to try them.

— There is a fish with an untranslatable name “surströmming”. Essentially, this is a small sprat that is pickled by rotting. Historically, it was simply buried in the ground for storage, where it rotted and created a sour taste. It’s so smelly that when some joker at school poured liquid from a can of fish under a locker, everyone was evacuated - they thought there was a sewer break,” Mikhail recalls.

Office on legs overlooking Westeros

We quickly head to the office, which is located in the city center. As soon as he crosses the threshold, Mikhail greets the girls and “high-fives” - he claps his palm against his palm.

“We don’t shake each other’s hands, we clap them.” Such gestures bring us together and distinguish us from others. “Everyone feels like a single team and takes care of the traditions that they themselves once came up with,” explains the head of the company.

What catches your eye is a map of the world, on which individual countries are marked with multi-colored pins.

— The map shows where we (the Schibsted media concern) dominate and where our competitors dominate. Among them is Facebook, which is popular in the world, but in Belarus for various reasons has not become a leader. Although in Mexico, for example, more than 90% of Internet users use it.

We enter the office and find ourselves in... Westeros: the interior is designed in the style of “Game of Thrones”, and on one of the walls there is a view of the seven kingdoms. If you look closely, you can also find elements of corporate history. For example, a campaign billboard with the slogan “Be Happy”, on which a man hugs a car with joy after buying it at Kufar. “Rejected “for the low level of aesthetics and ethics.” But now this is a story that we also value,” the interlocutor notes.

Lifting tables, the height of which can be adjusted at will, also attract attention - they are installed in all offices. It turns out that the top manager prefers to work standing and even refused to use a chair.

- This is to be in good shape. A sedentary lifestyle is harmful, but a standing lifestyle is much more beneficial. Moreover, you don’t just stand like a statue all the time, but shift from one foot to the other,” explains the interlocutor. — It’s difficult at first, you constantly think about it, but after a couple of weeks your body gets used to it. Now I only sit during meetings, or when I’m very tired.

We notice pebbles on the table - we ask about their origin:

— A couple of years ago, my fiancée and I traveled across the United States - from the east coast to the west. Somewhere in New Mexico we passed a small Indian settlement, where we looked for a souvenir. It turns out that there are deposits of such stone in this state, and the natives cut everything they can out of it. These stones can be purchased by weight. I decided to take one for myself to keep my fingers busy. True, when they fall from their hands, they scare people. So, ultimately, I switched to a spinner.

Our attention was drawn to a huge certificate for 20 thousand kufa next to the table. We ask if Mikhail received an annual bonus.

- That would be good, I wouldn’t refuse. This is exactly what the winners of the Kufarization business game received. The prize can be spent on opening an online storefront and promoting products on Kufar. The certificate has already managed to visit Brest, Gomel, Grodno, Mogilev and Minsk - it has traveled to almost all regional cities,” the top manager smiles.

“The smartphone taught me to fall asleep right after midnight”

Mikhail is always with his smartphone - mobile applications work even when he is sleeping.

— I’ve been using the Sleep Cycle sleep monitoring app for several years now. It shows when you go to bed, how much time you spend on it. The graph shows that if a couple of years ago I fell asleep at two in the morning, now I fall asleep around midnight. I'm a night owl by nature and I need something to get me into bed. This motivates a little,” admits Mikhail.

And when Mikhail wakes up, he reads world news in bed for half an hour. “As a rule, I scroll through aggregators - the international Squid and the Swedish Omni, and to find out about events in Belarus, I launch TUT.BY News,” he adds.

Several apps are dedicated to travel. Mileways has been tracking all of Mikhail's movements over the past years. A little more - and the map of Europe will turn into a “web” of routes due to endless flights.

The top manager also uses social networks, and very actively. And he looks for rare goods at Kufar. “For many, this platform has become a place where they can sell something that is no longer needed, but for me, it’s a place to find it and add to my collection, especially when it comes to musical rarities,” he explains.

“I read Bulgakov in Russian, Viking sagas in Swedish”

Mikhail is fluent in four languages, so his choice of books is unlimited. Recently he read a historical opus in Swedish, which cannot be found in Russian or English translation. That’s why our hero’s bookshelf is unusual, “international.”

— When you know a language well, you think in it. If I read a book in Swedish, then I’ll start thinking in Swedish,” explains the interlocutor. — I read fiction mostly in English. Swedish and Belarusian - rarely. I haven’t bought paper books for a long time - it’s more convenient on the iPad.

When Mikhail worked in Russia, he acquired the habit of visiting a bookstore near his home. Since the store was not doing very well, there were constantly sales - Mikhail bought armfuls of books. It was then that I read the novels of Bulgakov, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky for the first time.

The interlocutor picks up the book The Reconstruction of Nations by American historian Timothy Snyder. It describes the history of the development of the territories of Belarus, Poland, Lithuania and Ukraine - from the beginnings of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

— The information here is presented from an unusual perspective - through the image of one large state, from which separate new nations were gradually formed. Although history is usually written differently: they take a country and show the origins of its formation,” the interlocutor explains.

The heaviest volume was the classic work of Swedish literature, “The Red Serpent” by Franz Benfil. Its author talks about the heroic exploits of the legendary Viking.

— The book describes the life of the Vikings in a rather cynical way. That is, we are accustomed to seeing the Vikings as villains who sail, rob, and kill. And here everything is shown from an everyday point of view: robbery and murder were ordinary things for them, that is, criminal culture was a natural element of everyday life for them,” notes Mikhail. — It describes the period when the Vikings settled in Eastern European territories, how they dragged their galleys along the portages of Belarusian rivers, met with the Prince of Polotsk, and then went to fight with the Pechenegs and the Byzantines. Although this is fiction, I wouldn't look for clear historical parallels.

Among the books, a manual for managers was almost lost. Mikhail read it when he first became director of the company and was faced with the fact that all responsibility fell on his shoulders.

“I should have read something about how others carry this burden.” I bought a book called Now You Decide. It is written for directors of large corporations. And I read it and came to a startup with three employees,” says Mikhail. — To be honest, I didn’t like the book - it’s full of terrible advice, following which you can ruin your life. But I still learned one useful thing from it: from time to time you need to be interested not only in what inspires employees and what problems they have, but also what they fear. I ask each of my subordinates this question once every six months. We currently have a team of about 75 people along with moderators and accounting, as well as 1.2 million unique users per month, and we continue to grow. I am confident that the development of the project will continue at the same active pace in the future, albeit under the leadership of Artem Rabtsevich. He will replace me at the post very soon - at the beginning of 2018.

“My Working Day” is a project about time management and habits of office and personal life. What does a typical work day look like? What does the hero do to successfully manage staff? What books does he read? What mobile applications do you use and how do they help you manage your personal time? Does he play sports, what does he eat, and what is his general relationship with healthy lifestyle?

“My Working Day” is a project about time management and habits of office and personal life. What does a typical work day look like? What does the hero do to successfully manage staff? What books does he read? What mobile applications do you use and how do they help you manage your personal time? Does he play sports, what does he eat, and what is his general relationship with healthy lifestyle? Let us recall that the hero of the previous issue of the project was the Deputy Chairman of the Board of Priorbank Bernd Rosenberg..html