Description of the comparative characteristics of Chatsky and Molochlin. Comparative characteristics of Chatsky and Molchalin (based on the comedy by A.S.

These characters are completely different in every way. By worldview, upbringing, character, in an effort to earn their place under the sun. Flattery, humiliation and all the base qualities of a person are acceptable to Molchalin.

Chatsky is a nobleman by birth, and all the best features of a noble person are reflected in him. Molchalin does not have noble roots, his position in society, he achieved thanks to his boss.

Due to his origin, Chatsky is educated and comprehensively developed as a person. Molchalin, on the contrary, is stupid and not educated in his aspirations, apart from obtaining a new rank, he is not interested in anything else.

Chatsky is the opposite in all views. In aspirations and in character, a completely different person. Chatsky loves his homeland and country, a very passionate and bright young man.

Molchalin, on the contrary, is completely invisible and faceless, the main goal of his life is to get a position. And the more prestigious, the better, this is a dishonest, two-faced person who will stop at nothing to achieve his goals.

Chatsky does not like the obsolete past, he strives for a brighter future. And hopes that society will change for the better. Chatsky served in the army, rose to the rank of officer, and is now retired.

In society, when discussing various topics of interest to society, Chatsky openly and frankly share his conclusions.

Molchalin, on the contrary, does not express his thoughts, but agrees with the thoughts of officials who are higher in rank in order to win them over and move up the career ladder.

Chatsky will not obey and flatter in order to be loved in society, while Molchalin is ready for all humiliations for the sake of career growth. And his recognition in society.

During the reading of the work, it turns out that Chatsky is a frank and courageous person. Molchalin is his absolute opposite, a liar, a coward and a careerist.

In the house of Famusov, Chatsky is considered an incomprehensible person. Soon because of this, he leaves. Molchalin, on the contrary, fit well into this society. As a result, Chatsky leaves Moscow, and Molchalin remains here to live and earn himself a new rank.

Molchalin, on the other hand, acts as a liar, a flatterer, a silent man and a careerist. Who is ready for anything in order to be recognized in society and given a new title. For this, he does not disdain anything, except for everything, Chatsky and Molchalin became rivals in winning Sophia's love.

And what is interesting is the flatterer and liar Molchalin she liked, and not the honest, frank and ardent Chatsky. But soon, Sophia leaves, Molchalin learning that he is caring for Lisa at the same time.

The conclusion from all this is the following, and our society is full of Chatskys and Molchalins. Some are honest and frank, proud and self-confident, having their own point of view in everything. Others are quiet and calm hypocrites who agree with everything, who think one thing and say another. They lie and are amiable in order to achieve their goals.

Composition Chatsky and Molchalin comparison for grade 9

"Woe from Wit" is a work that gives an accurate picture of the life of the Moscow nobles of the 19th century. In his immortal creation A.S. Griboyedov tried to raise the main problems of this time: the political system, serfdom, education, human relationships. These issues are considered by the writer from two opposite angles: "the current century" in the person of Alexander Chatsky and the "past century" in the person of Famusov, Molchalin, Skalozub, Zagoretsky. Through the struggle between Molchalin and Chatsky, Griboyedov tried to describe the struggle of these generations.

Alexander Chatsky is the central figure in the play. This is a poor nobleman who has received an education and has a mind and has his own point of view on everything, which he is not afraid to express.

First of all, Chatsky actively opposes the system of serfdom. He speaks with fury and indignation about how one landowner exchanged servants for purebred dogs. His anger also arouses the bow of the nobility to the west, where even Russian is spoken interspersed with French words.

Chatsky actively advocates and promotes the revival of Russia. Strive to selflessly serve the Fatherland and benefit society. However, he does not want to be hypocritical and be a toady, just to get a high rank and honor.

All the talk about a successful career, wealth, successful and mutually beneficial marriages makes the protagonist want to fight and try to change such a society.

But Alexei Molchalin is quite comfortable living and existing in the Famus society. To please everyone who is higher than his rank - Molchalin successfully succeeds in this matter. The young man considers his main advantages: the ability to remain silent, moderation, accuracy, helpfulness and the ability to remain cautious in everything. He understands well that a rootless official cannot break into the people without the support of people who have a position in society and power. The deceitfulness of this character can be seen in his attitude towards people. Without a twinge of conscience, Molchalin is able to please and flatter Famusov, 65-year-old Madame Khlestova, whispering sugary compliments to her, only to "get a higher rank."

The difference between Chatsky and Molchalin is clearly manifested in relation to the theme of love. If Molchalin lies about his tender feelings for Sophia for the sake of a career, then Chatsky is capable of sincere feelings. For her sake, he tries to stay in a society that openly considers him crazy and a "dangerous person." Chatsky suffers from the fact that the girl she loves, succumbing to the mood of her surroundings, has chosen as her husband a convenient and close-minded person, and not him, a reasonable man and “hungry for knowledge”.

Unfortunately, the social and love torments of Alexander Chatsky remain unresolved. His penetrating mind cannot influence the frozen and immoral world in any way. But the desire and desire of Chatsky to fight bureaucracy and the indifference of society, of course, characterize him as an extraordinary and progressive-minded person.

Some interesting essays

For many, late autumn is not the most pleasant time: rains, gloomy weather, few when the sun appears. Quite rare songs of birds barely audibly make their way through the incessant raindrops.

• Composition The role of science in human life

  We rarely think about science and believe that science is the lot of scientists, and ordinary people have nothing to do with it. But is it really so? Is science really not that important to each of us?

Everything starts with words. A child is born, and already understands human speech, accumulates a passive vocabulary. Hears the voice of parents, adopts their communication habits

Life without a dream... is it possible? I think no. We all live dreams, and not only. Agree, in childhood, every person dreamed of something, right? The whole disadvantage of a childhood dream is that it is probably more like a funny joke.

• Yanko's composition in the novel Lermontov's Hero of Our Time

  Yanko is an episodic hero of the story "Taman" from Lermontov's "Hero of Our Time". A few phrases and actions reveal the features of his personality. There are not many of them, but they are capacious and bright.

And - two completely different, opposite heroes of Griboedov's comedy "". They can be safely attributed to the representatives of the "current century" and "past century". Being approximately the same age, they preach diametrically opposed interests. They have a different philosophy, life position and life values.

Molchalin - the person "got accustomed". He is a liar and selfish, ready to humiliate himself in order to achieve his goal. Molchalin became the personification of a representative of servility and self-humiliation.

Chatsky is not like that at all. Perhaps in the image of Chatsky we see the character traits of Griboedov himself. Chatsky was a patriot of his ideas. He refuses public service, because he does not accept bureaucracy and bureaucracy. On the contrary, Molchalin will do everything to get a promotion.

Griboyedov endows Molchalin with the only talent - accuracy.

Being an opponent of such ideas, Chatsky, represented by Molchalin, despises the entire Famus society. He dreams that "the current century" will change something in these people. Chatsky was a Decembrist of his time.

Griboyedov shows us Chatsky and Molchalin in the prism of their relationship and interaction with others.

Molchalin is a person who seeks only personal material gain in everything, deceiving Sophia and Lisa. His behavior is caused by a feeling of envy towards others. He achieves his goal with the help of lies and flattery.

Chatsky had no friends. He was in love with, which did not reciprocate. On the pages of comedy, we see him only in conflicts and disputes with others. We learn about the life principles of Chatsky from his monologues, addressed not so much to the main characters of the work, but to the whole nation.

In the images of Chatsky and Molchalin, Griboyedov showed us two worlds - the past and the future. Without giving a clear preference to one of them, he still supports the world of Chatsky.

Chatsky and Molchalin are the heroes of Griboedov's comedy “Woe from Wit. They are absolutely different both in character, and in worldview, and in position in society. Molchalin is a typical representative of the Famus era, the personification of servility, lies, flattery, selfishness, self-humiliation for selfish purposes. Chatsky is absolutely opposite to Molchalin. Many aspects of Griboyedov's soul were reflected in the image of Chatsky. He is a true and passionate patriot.

“He does not serve, that is, he does not find any benefit in that,

But I would like, I would be businesslike,

It's a pity, it's a pity, he's small with a head.

And he writes and translates well.”

Molchalin is by nature quiet and faceless. The main task in life is to make a career and get a high rank:

And yet, he will reach the known degrees,

After all, now they love the dumb ...

For Molchalin, there are no concepts of honor and pride:

In my summer should not dare,

Have your own opinion.

The only talent that Griboyedov endowed him with is moderation and accuracy. Molchalin is two-faced.

Chatsky despises and condemns the "past century". He is sure that the current century will justify his hopes and will change, shake, stir up the dormant society. Chatsky can be considered as a person of the Decembrist warehouse:

“Who serves the cause, not the persons ...”, “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to serve.”

Chatsky is lonely, he has no friends. The person he loves treats him with indifference. Chatsky's communication with people is built on disputes, conflicts, conversations or monologues, addressed not so much to the interlocutor, but to the whole society.

In the comedy Woe from Wit, the author contrasts Chatsky and Molchalin with each other in order to most clearly reveal their characters. Griboyedov, presents us with two sciences of life for discussion: the present century and the past century, although he himself supports the views of Chatsky.

Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" is a unique cast of the emerging, but already irreconcilable struggle in society at the beginning of the 19th century between progressive, progressive-minded youth and conservative-minded representatives of serf antiquity. These two different social camps in the comedy are picturesquely represented by Chatsky and Molchalin - people of opposite life positions, moral norms, worldview.

Despite the deep dissimilarity, in Molchalin and Chatsky one can also find common features that attracted Sofia Famusova to each of them (at different times). These two young and intelligent people are connected with the Famusov house. Chatsky is the son of a friend of Famusov, brought up in this house. At a young age, he left Moscow, "searched his mind", studied, saw and learned a lot. Molchalin works as a secretary in Famusov's house, enjoys universal love and respect:

As far as I work and strength, Since then, as listed in the Archives, I received three awards.

But here the author brings them together in a comedy, and we see how much Chatsky and Molchalin differ from each other, and this dissimilarity cannot be hidden under the outer shell. The very appearance of these heroes in a comedy can tell about many traits of their characters.

Chatsky literally breaks into the plot, he is passionately in love and happy after a long separation to see Sophia. Joy and energy fill him so much that he does not immediately notice the coldness of the girl. Molchalin, on the other hand, enters the comedy first silent, and then justifying and confused. And soon we will learn something about these heroes through their assessment by other actors, in their speeches and actions.

How do household members of the Famu-owl house and the owner himself speak of Chatsky?

Who is so sensitive, and cheerful, and sharp, Like Alexander Andreyich Chatsky! He is sharp, smart, eloquent, Especially happy among friends... ...he is small with a head, And he writes and translates nicely.

Chatsky is a nobleman and is proud of it. He is distinguished from those around him by love of freedom and independence of views, frankness and directness of statements. Chatsky sees the goal of his life in serving the fatherland, he is a true patriot of his homeland, but servility, the struggle for ranks, titles, awards oppress him and revolt:

I would be glad to serve, it is sickening to serve.

He is ready to serve “the cause, not the persons”, but in the Famus society this is impossible. It is the independence of judgments, the desire to judge a person by deeds, and not by the position he occupies in society, openness and directness in relation to Chatsky cause a complete misunderstanding of others, aggression and rejection on their part:

Oh! My God! he's carbonari! A dangerous person! And I don't want to know you, I can't stand depravity.

But what about Molchalin? How did he gain confidence and win the sincere respect of those very people who are so ruthless to Chatsky?

Look, he has gained the friendship of everyone in the house, He has been serving with the priest for three years, He often gets angry for no reason, And he will disarm him with silence, Forgive him from the kindness of his soul. And by the way, I could look for Gaiety; Not at all: they won’t step over the threshold from the old people.

A little time is needed to understand that Molchalin fully accepts the laws of the Famus society and becomes indispensable for him. He is cowardly and always subordinates his way of thinking to what is accepted in society:

At my age, one should not dare to have His judgment. After all, you have to depend on others.

Molchalin considers his most important virtues to be helpfulness, moderation and accuracy. A flatterer, a hypocrite, a sycophant and a clerk, most of all in life he dreams of "reaching the known degrees", which, most likely, will come true, "because now they love the dumb" Calculating to the smallest detail, Molchalin can always count on support and patronage "the mighty of this world."

Relations with Sophia bring Chatsky and Molchalin together, two opposing positions painfully collide. Chatsky is impeccably honest and sincere with Sophia and expects the same frankness from her. He does not hide not only his joy and happiness, but also his bewilderment and even indignation. Very soon he realizes that he is unloved by the girl, but he wants to know: who is the rival?

Oh! Sophia! Is Molchalin chosen by her! Why not a husband? There is only little mind in him; But in order to have children, Who lacked the mind? Helpful, modest, there is a blush in his face. Here he is, on tiptoe, and not rich in words; With what divination he knew how to get into her heart!

However, a few minutes of communication with this mean and flattering person dispels his suspicions:

With such feelings, with such a soul, We love!.. The deceiver laughed at me!

Sophia, under the influence of French novels, has a different opinion. Having fallen in love with a cunning and dishonorable person, she cannot see the true face under the mask:

Molchalin is ready to forget himself for others, Enemy of insolence, - always shy, timidly A whole night with whom you can spend like this!

But what about Molchalin? Molchalin is moving forward in life, fulfilling the precepts of his father:

My father bequeathed to me: Firstly, to please all people without exception - to the Owner, where he happens to live. To the chief, with whom I will serve, to his Servant, who cleans dresses, to the Porter, the janitor, to avoid evil. The janitor's dog, so that it was affectionate.

Therefore, Sophia for Molchalin is just another step in conquering the career ladder. Without hesitation, he admits: material from the site

However, this does not prevent Molchalin from shamelessly flirting with Liza, with whom he does not even consider it necessary to hide his vile little soul:

I don't see anything Enviable in Sofya Pavlovna...

Having learned about Sophia's chosen one, Chatsky cannot restrain his indignation:

Here I am donated to whom! I don’t know how I tempered the rage in myself! I looked and saw and did not believe!

But Sophia is also struck by the "curvature of the soul" of her former beloved, she drives him away in anger.

In his comedy, Griboyedov created a gallery of typical characters that go beyond the historical framework of the era and the play itself. Chatsky is a type of fighter who is ready to defend his beliefs in any situation, and even in case of defeat he does not change them. Today, the Molchalins are called hypocrites and liars, vile careerists and low worshipers. And in our time, "Molchalins are blissful in the world," but Chatsky is the engine of progress, a representative of young progressive youth.

I think that Griboedov, having portrayed the types of Chatsky and Molchalin, suggested that his contemporaries and descendants make their own moral choice, learn to appreciate people according to their human dignity, and not according to the masks they put on.

Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search

On this page, material on the topics:

• comparative characteristics of Chatsky and Molochlin
• molochlin characteristic byron
• essay grief from the mind of chatsky and molachlin small
• full message about chatsky
• essay comparing molachlin and chatsky