Features of the creative manner of V. Garshin in the works included in children's reading. Poetics of V.M's prose

04.03.2020

The first two stories of Garshin, with which he entered the literature, outwardly do not resemble each other. One of them is dedicated to depicting the horrors of war ("Four Days"), the other recreates the story of tragic love ("The Incident").

In the first, the world is transmitted through the consciousness of a single hero; it is based on associative combinations of feelings and thoughts experienced now, this minute, with experiences and episodes of a past life. The second story is based on a love theme.

The sad fate of his heroes is determined by tragically undeveloped relationships, and the reader sees the world through the eyes of one or another hero. But the stories have a common theme, and it will become one of the main ones for most of Garshin's works. Private Ivanov, isolated from the world by the force of circumstances, immersed in himself, comes to an understanding of the complexity of life, to a reassessment of habitual views and moral norms.

The story "The Incident" begins with the fact that his heroine, "already forgetting herself," suddenly begins to think about her life: "How it happened that I, who had not thought about anything for almost two years, began to think, I cannot understand."

The tragedy of Nadezhda Nikolaevna is connected with her loss of faith in people, kindness, responsiveness: “Do they exist, good people, did I see them both after and before my catastrophe? Am I supposed to think there are good people when out of the dozens I know, there isn't one that I can't hate?" In these words of the heroine there is a terrible truth, it is not the result of speculation, but a conclusion from all life experience and therefore acquires special persuasiveness. That tragic and fatal thing that kills the heroine also kills the person who fell in love with her.

All personal experience tells the heroine that people are worthy of contempt and noble impulses are always defeated by base motives. The love story concentrated social evil in the experience of one person, and therefore it became especially concrete and visible. And all the more terrible that the victim of social disorders unwittingly, regardless of his desire, became the bearer of evil.

In the story "Four Days", which brought the author all-Russian fame, the hero's insight also lies in the fact that he simultaneously feels himself both a victim of social disorder and a murderer. This idea, important for Garshin, is complicated by another theme that determines the principles for constructing a number of the writer's stories.

Nadezhda Nikolaevna met many people who, with a "rather sad look," asked her, "Is it possible to somehow get away from such a life?" These outwardly very simple words contain irony, sarcasm and a true tragedy that goes beyond the unfinished life of a particular person. In them is a complete characterization of people who know that they are doing evil, and yet do it.

With their “rather sad look” and essentially indifferent question, they calmed their conscience and lied not only to Nadezhda Nikolaevna, but also to themselves. Assuming a "sad look", they paid tribute to humanity and then, as if fulfilling a necessary duty, acted in accordance with the laws of the existing world order.

This theme is developed in the story "Meeting" (1879). There are two heroes in it, as if sharply opposed to each other: one who retained ideal impulses and moods, the other who completely lost them. The secret of the story, however, lies in the fact that this is not a contrast, but a comparison: the antagonism of the characters is imaginary.

“I don’t resent you, and that’s all,” says the predator and businessman to his friend and very convincingly proves to him that he does not believe in high ideals, but only puts on “some kind of uniform”.

This is the same uniform that Nadezhda Nikolaevna's visitors wear when they ask about her fate. It is important for Garshin to show that with the help of this uniform, the majority manage to close their eyes to the evil prevailing in the world, calm their conscience and sincerely consider themselves moral people.

“The worst lie in the world,” says the hero of the story “Night,” is a lie to oneself.” Its essence lies in the fact that a person quite sincerely professes certain ideals that are recognized as high in society, but in reality lives, guided by completely different criteria, either without being aware of this gap, or deliberately without thinking about it.

Vasily Petrovich is still indignant at the way of life of his comrade. But Garshin foresees the possibility that humane impulses will soon become a “uniform” that hides, if not reprehensible, then at least quite elementary and purely personal requests.

At the beginning of the story, from pleasant dreams about how he will educate his students in the spirit of high civic virtues, the teacher moves on to thoughts about his future life, about his family: “And these dreams seemed to him even more pleasant than even dreams about a public figure who will come to him to give thanks for the good seeds sown in his heart.”

A similar situation is developed by Garshin in the story "Artists" (1879). Social evil in this story is seen not only by Ryabinin, but also by his antipode Dedov. It is he who points out to Ryabinin the terrible working conditions of the workers at the plant: “And do you think they get a lot for such hard labor? Pennies!<...>How many painful impressions at all these factories, Ryabinin, if you only knew! I'm so glad I got rid of them for good. It was just hard to live at first, looking at all this suffering ... ".

And Dedov turns away from these difficult impressions, turning to nature and art, reinforcing his position with the theory of beauty he created. This is also the "uniform" that he puts on to believe in his own decency.

But it's still a fairly simple form of lying. Central in the work of Garshin will not be a negative hero (as modern criticism of Garshin noticed, there are not many of them in his works), but a person who overcomes high, “noble” forms of lying to himself. This lie is connected with the fact that a person, not only in words, but also in deeds, follows high, admittedly, ideas and moral standards, such as loyalty to a cause, duty, homeland, art.

As a result, however, he is convinced that following these ideals does not lead to a decrease, but, on the contrary, to an increase in evil in the world. The study of the causes of this paradoxical phenomenon in modern society and the awakening and torment of conscience associated with it is one of the main Garshin themes in Russian literature.

Dedov is sincerely passionate about his work, and it obscures for him the world and the suffering of others. Ryabinin, who constantly asked himself the question of who needed his art and why, also felt how artistic creativity was beginning to acquire self-sufficient significance for him. He suddenly saw that “the questions are: where? For what? disappear during work; there is one thought in the head, one goal, and bringing it into execution is a pleasure. The painting is the world in which you live and to which you are responsible. Here worldly morality disappears: you create a new one for yourself in your new world and in it you feel your rightness, dignity or insignificance and lies in your own way, regardless of life.

This is what Ryabinin has to overcome in order not to leave life, not to create, although very high, but still a separate world, alienated from common life. Ryabinin's revival will come when he feels someone else's pain as his own, understands that people have learned not to notice the evil around him, and feels himself responsible for social untruth.

It is necessary to kill the peace of people who have learned to lie to themselves - such a task will be set by Ryabinin and Garshin, who created this image.

The hero of the story "Four Days" goes to war, imagining only how he will "put his chest under the bullets." This is his high and noble self-deception. It turns out that in war you need not only to sacrifice yourself, but also to kill others. In order for the hero to see clearly, Garshin needs to get him out of his usual rut.

“I have never been in such a strange position,” Ivanov says. The meaning of this phrase is not only that the wounded hero lies on the battlefield and sees in front of him the corpse of the fellah he killed. The strangeness and unusualness of his view of the world lies in the fact that what he had previously seen through the prism of general ideas about duty, war, self-sacrifice is suddenly illuminated with a new light. In this light, the hero sees differently not only the present, but also his entire past. In his memory there are episodes to which he did not attach much importance before.

Significantly, for example, is the title of a book he had read before: Physiology of Everyday Life. It was written that a person can live without food for more than a week and that one suicide who starved himself to death lived a very long time because he drank. In "ordinary" life, these facts could only interest him, nothing more. Now his life depends on a sip of water, and the "physiology of everyday life" appears before him in the form of the decaying corpse of a murdered fellah. But in a sense, what is happening to him is also the ordinary life of the war, and he is not the first wounded man to die on the battlefield.

Ivanov recalls how many times before he had to hold skulls in his hands and dissect whole heads. This, too, was commonplace, and he was never surprised by it. Here, too, a skeleton in a uniform with bright buttons made him shudder. Previously, he calmly read in the newspapers that "our losses are insignificant." Now this “minor loss” was himself.

It turns out that human society is arranged in such a way that the terrible in it becomes commonplace. Thus, in the gradual comparison of the present and the past, Ivanov discovers the truth of human relations and the lies of the ordinary, that is, as he now understands, a distorted view of life, and the question of guilt and responsibility arises. What is the fault of the Turkish fellah he killed? “And what is my fault, even though I killed him?” Ivanov asks.

The whole story is built on this opposition of "before" and "now". Previously, Ivanov, in a noble impulse, went to war in order to sacrifice himself, but it turns out that he did not sacrifice himself, but others. Now the hero knows who he is. “Murder, murderer... And who is it? I!". Now he also knows why he became a murderer: “When I started going to fight, my mother and Masha did not dissuade me, although they cried over me.

Blinded by the idea, I did not see those tears. I did not understand (now I understand) what I was doing with beings close to me. He was "blinded by the idea" of duty and self-sacrifice and did not know that society distorts human relations so much that the most noble idea can lead to a violation of fundamental moral norms.

Many paragraphs of the story “Four Days” begin with the pronoun “I”, then the action performed by Ivanov is called: “I woke up ...”, “I rise ...”, “I lie ...”, “I crawl .. . "," I come to despair ...". The last phrase is: "I can speak and tell them everything that is written here." “I can” should be understood here as “I must” - I must reveal to others the truth that I have just known.

For Garshin, most of the actions of people are based on a general idea, an idea. But from this position he draws a paradoxical conclusion. Having learned to generalize, a person has lost the immediacy of perception of the world. From the point of view of general laws, the death of people in war is natural and necessary. But the dying on the battlefield does not want to accept this necessity.

A certain strangeness, unnaturalness in the perception of the war is also noticed by the hero of the story “Coward” (1879): “Nerves, or something, are so arranged with me, only military telegrams indicating the number of dead and wounded produce a much stronger effect on me than on surrounding. Another calmly reads: “Our losses are insignificant, such and such officers were wounded, 50 lower ranks were killed, 100 were wounded,” and he is also glad that there are few, but when I read such news, a whole bloody picture immediately appears before my eyes.

Why, the hero continues, if the newspapers report the murder of several people, is everyone outraged? Why does the railway accident, in which several dozen people died, attract the attention of all of Russia? But why is no one indignant when it is written about insignificant losses at the front, equal to the same several dozen people? The murder and the train crash are accidents that could have been prevented.

War is a regularity, many people should be killed in it, this is natural. But it is difficult for the hero of the story to see naturalness and regularity here, “His nerves are arranged in such a way” that he does not know how to generalize, but on the contrary, he concretizes general provisions. He sees the illness and death of his friend Kuzma, and this impression is multiplied in him by the figures reported by military reports.

But, having gone through the experience of Ivanov, who recognized himself as a murderer, it is impossible, it is impossible to go to war. Therefore, such a decision of the hero of the story “Coward” looks quite logical and natural. No arguments of reason about the necessity of war matter to him, because, as he says, "I do not talk about war and relate to it with a direct feeling, indignant at the mass of shed blood." And yet he goes to war. It is not enough for him to feel the suffering of people dying in the war as his own, he needs to share the suffering with everyone. Only then can the conscience be at peace.

For the same reason, Ryabinin from the story "Artists" refuses to do artistic work. He created a picture that depicted the torment of the worker and which was supposed to "kill the peace of the people." This is the first step, but he also takes the next step - he goes to those who suffer. It is on this psychological basis that the story "Coward" combines an angry denial of the war with a conscious participation in it.

In Garshin's next work about the war, From the Memoirs of Private Ivanov (1882), the passionate sermon against the war and the moral problems associated with it fade into the background. The image of the external world occupies the same place as the image of the process of its perception. At the center of the story is the question of the relationship between a soldier and an officer, more broadly, between the people and the intelligentsia. Participation in the war for the intelligent private Ivanov is his going to the people.

The immediate political tasks that the populists set themselves turned out to be unfulfilled, but for the intelligentsia of the early 80s. the need for unity with the people and knowledge of it continued to be the main issue of the era. Many of the Narodniks attributed their defeat to the fact that they idealized the people, created an image of it that did not correspond to reality. This had its own truth, about which both G. Uspensky and Korolenko wrote. But the ensuing disappointment led to the other extreme - to "a quarrel with a younger brother." This painful state of "quarrel" is experienced by the hero of the story, Wenzel.

Once he lived by a passionate faith in the people, but when he encountered them, he became disappointed and embittered. He correctly understood that Ivanov was going to war in order to get closer to the people, and warned them against a "literary" outlook on life. In his opinion, it was literature that "raised the peasant into the pearl of creation", giving rise to an unfounded admiration for him.

Disappointment in the people of Wenzel, like many like him, really came from a too idealistic, literary, "head" idea of ​​​​him. Crashed, these ideals were replaced by another extreme - contempt for the people. But, as Garshin shows, this contempt also turned out to be head and not always consistent with the soul and heart of the hero. The story ends with the fact that after the battle, in which fifty-two soldiers from Wenzel's company died, he, "huddled in the corner of the tent and lowered his head on some kind of box," muffled sobs.

Unlike Wenzel, Ivanov did not approach the people with preconceived notions of one kind or another. This allowed him to see in the soldiers their courage, moral strength, and devotion to duty. When five young volunteers repeated the words of the old military oath “without sparing the stomach” to bear all the hardships of a military campaign, he, “looking at the ranks of gloomy people ready for battle<...>I felt that these were not empty words.

History of Russian literature: in 4 volumes / Edited by N.I. Prutskov and others - L., 1980-1983

Introduction

Chapter 1. Forms of psychological analysis in the prose of V.M. Garshina

1.1. Artistic nature of confession 24-37

1.2. The psychological function of the "close-up" 38-47

1.3. Psychological function of portrait, landscape, environment 48-61

Chapter 2 The poetics of narration in the prose of V.M. Garshina

2.1. Narrative types (description, narration, reasoning) 62-97

2.2. "Alien speech" and its narrative functions 98-109

2.3. Functions of the narrator and narrator in the writer's prose 110-129

2.4. Point of View in Narrative Structure and Poetics of Psychologism 130-138

Conclusion 139-146

References 147-173

Introduction to work

Unrelenting interest in the poetics of V.M. Garshin indicates that this area of ​​research remains very relevant for modern science. The writer's work has long been the object of study from the standpoint of various trends and literary schools. However, in this research diversity, three methodological approaches stand out, each of which brings together a whole group of scientists.

TO first The group should include scientists (G.A. Byalogo, N.Z. Belyaev, A.N. Latynin), who consider Garshin’s work in the context of his biography. Describing the prose writer's writing style in general, they analyze his works in chronological order, correlating certain "shifts" in poetics with the stages of his creative path.

In research second directions, Garshin's prose is covered mainly in a comparative typological aspect. First of all, here we should mention the article by N.V. Kozhukhovskaya "Tolstoy's tradition in the military stories of V.M. Garshin" (1992), where it is especially noted that in the minds of Garshin's characters (as well as in the minds of L.N. Tolstoy's characters) there is no "protective psychological reaction” that would allow them not to be tormented by feelings of guilt and personal responsibility. Works in Garshin studies of the second half of the 20th century are devoted to comparing the work of Garshin and F.M. Dostoevsky (article by F.I. Evnin “F.M. Dostoevsky and V.M. Garshin” (1962), PhD thesis by G.A. Skleinis “Typology of characters in F.M. Dostoevsky’s novel “The Brothers Karamazov” and in .M. Garshin in the 80s” (1992)).

Third The group consists of the works of those researchers who

focused on the study of individual elements of poetics

Garshin prose, including the poetics of his psychologism. Special interest

presents the dissertation research of V.I. Shubin "Skill

psychological analysis in the work of V.M. Garshin" (1980). In our

observations, we relied on his conclusions that the distinctive

the peculiarity of the writer's stories is "... internal energy, requiring a short and lively expression, psychological saturation of the image and the whole story.<...>The moral and social issues that permeate all of Garshin's work have found their vivid and deep expression in the method of psychological analysis based on the comprehension of the value of the human personality, the moral principle in a person's life and his social behavior. In addition, we took into account the research results of the third chapter of the work “Forms and means of psychological analysis in the stories of V.M. Garshin”, in which V.I. Shubin distinguishes five forms of psychological analysis: internal monologue, dialogue, dreams, portrait and landscape. Supporting the conclusions of the researcher, we nevertheless note that we consider the portrait and landscape in a wider, from the point of view of the poetics of psychologism, functional range.

Various aspects of the poetics of Garshin prose were analyzed by the authors of the collective study “Poetics of V.M. Garshin” (1990) Yu.G. Milyukov, P. Henry and others. The book touches upon, in particular, the problems of theme and form (including types of narration and types of lyricism), images of the hero and the “counterhero”, considers the writer’s impressionistic style and the “artistic mythology” of individual works, raises the question of the principles for studying Garshin’s unfinished stories ( reconstruction problem).

The three-volume collection "Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century" ("Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century") presents research by scientists from different countries. The authors of the collection pay attention not only to various aspects of poetics (S.N. Kaidash-Lakshina "The image of a "fallen woman" in the work of Garshin", E.M. Sventsitskaya "The concept of personality and conscience in the work of Vs. Garshin", Yu.B. Orlitsky "Poems in prose in the work of V.M. Garshin", etc.), but also solve the complex problems of translating the writer's prose into English (M. Dewhirst "Three Translations of Garshin" s Story "Three Red Flowers" ", etc. .).

Problems of poetics occupy an important place in almost all works devoted to the work of Garshin. However, most of the structural studies are still private or episodic. This applies primarily to the study of narration and the poetics of psychologism. In those works that come close to these problems, it is more about posing a question than about solving it, which in itself is an incentive for further research. That's why relevant we can consider the identification of forms of psychological analysis and the main components of the poetics of narration, which allows us to come close to the problem of the structural combination of psychologism and narration in Garshin's prose.

Scientific novelty The work is determined by the fact that for the first time a consistent consideration of the poetics of psychologism and narration in Garshin's prose, which is the most characteristic feature of the writer's prose, is proposed. A systematic approach to the study of Garshin's work is presented. The supporting categories in the poetics of the writer's psychologism (confession, "close-up", portrait, landscape, setting) are revealed. Such narrative forms in Garshin's prose as description, narration, reasoning, other people's speech (direct, indirect, improperly direct), points of view, categories of the narrator and narrator are defined.

Subject studies are eighteen stories by Garshin.

Target dissertation research - identification and analytical description of the main artistic forms of psychological analysis in Garshin's prose, a systematic study of its narrative poetics. The research super-task is to demonstrate how the connection between the forms of psychological analysis and narration is carried out in the writer's prose works.

In accordance with the goal, specific tasks research:

1. consider the confession in the poetics of the author's psychologism;

    determine the functions of "close-up", portrait, landscape, environment in the poetics of the writer's psychologism;

    to study the poetics of narration in the writer's works, to reveal the artistic function of all narrative forms;

    to identify the functions of "foreign word" and "point of view" in Garshin's narrative;

5. describe the functions of the narrator and narrator in the writer's prose.
Methodological and theoretical basis dissertations are

literary works of A.P. Auera, M.M. Bakhtin, Yu.B. Boreva, L.Ya. Ginzburg, A.B. Esina, A.B. Krinitsyna, Yu.M. Lotman, Yu.V. Manna, A.P. Skaftymova, N.D. Tamarchenko, B.V. Tomashevsky, M.S. Uvarova, B.A. Uspensky, V.E. Khalizeva, V. Schmid, E.G. Etkind, as well as the linguistic studies of V.V. Vinogradova, N.A. Kozhevnikova, O.A. Nechaeva, G.Ya. Solganika. Based on the works of these scientists and the achievements of modern narratology, a methodology was developed immanent analysis, allowing to reveal the artistic essence of the literary phenomenon in full accordance with the author's creative aspiration. The main methodological reference point for us was the "model" of immanent analysis, presented in the work of A.P. Skaftymov "Thematic composition of the novel "The Idiot"".

theoretical meaning The work consists in the fact that on the basis of the results obtained, an opportunity is created to deepen the scientific understanding of the poetics of psychologism and the structure of the narrative in Garshin's prose. The conclusions made in the work can serve as a basis for further theoretical study of Garshin's work in modern literary criticism.

Practical significance The work consists in the fact that its results can be used in the development of a course in the history of Russian literature of the 19th century, special courses and special seminars dedicated to the work of Garshin.

Dissertation materials can be included in an elective course for classes in the humanities in a secondary school. The main provisions for defense:

1. Confession in Garshin's prose contributes to deep penetration into
the inner world of the hero. In the story "Night" the hero's confession becomes
main form of psychological analysis. In other stories ("Four
day”, “Incident”, “Coward”) she is not given a central place, but she
yet becomes an important part of poetics and interacts with other
forms of psychological analysis.

    "Close-up" in Garshin's prose is presented: a) in the form of detailed descriptions with comments of an evaluative and analytical nature ("From the memoirs of Private Ivanov"); b) when describing dying people, the reader's attention is drawn to the inner world, the psychological state of the hero who is nearby ("Death", "Coward"); c) in the form of a list of the actions of the heroes who perform them at the moment when the consciousness is turned off (“Signal”, “Nadezhda Nikolaevna”).

    Portrait and landscape sketches, descriptions of the situation in Garshin's stories enhance the author's emotional impact on the reader, visual perception and in many ways contribute to revealing the inner movements of the characters' souls.

    Three types of narration dominate in the narrative structure of Garshin's works: description (portrait, landscape, setting, characterization), narration (specific stage, generalized stage and informational) and reasoning (nominal evaluative reasoning, reasoning to justify actions, reasoning to prescribe or descriptions of actions, reasoning with the meaning of affirmation or negation).

    Direct speech in the texts of the writer can belong to both the hero and objects (plants). In the works of Garshin, the internal monologue is built as a character's appeal to himself. The study of indirect and

indirect speech shows that these forms of someone else's speech in Garshin's prose are much less common than direct speech. For the writer, it is more important to reproduce the true thoughts and feelings of the characters (which are much more convenient to convey through direct speech, thereby preserving the inner feelings and emotions of the characters). Garshin's stories contain the following points of view: in terms of ideology, spatio-temporal characteristics and psychology.

    The narrator in Garshin's prose manifests himself in the forms of presentation of events from the first person, and the narrator - from the third, which is a systemic pattern in the poetics of the writer's narration.

    Psychologism and narration in Garshin's poetics are in constant interaction. In such a combination, they form a mobile system within which structural interactions occur.

Approbation of work. The main provisions of the dissertation research were presented in scientific reports at conferences: at the X Vinogradov Readings (GOU VPO MGPU. 2007, Moscow); XI Vinogradov Readings (GOU VPO MGPU, 2009, Moscow); X conference of young philologists "Poetics and comparative studies" (GOU VPO MO "KSPI", 2007, Kolomna). 5 articles were published on the topic of the study, including two in publications included in the list of the Higher Attestation Commission of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia.

Work structure determined by the goals and objectives of the study. The dissertation consists of an Introduction, two chapters, a Conclusion and a list of references. IN first The chapter consistently examines the forms of psychological analysis in Garshin's prose. In second The chapter analyzes the narrative models by which the narration in the writer's stories is organized. The work ends with a list of literature, including 235 items.

Artistic nature of confession

Confession as a literary genre after N.V. Gogol is increasingly distributed in Russian literature of the XIX century. From the moment confession established itself as a genre in the Russian literary tradition, the opposite phenomenon began: it becomes a component of a literary work, a speech organization of a text, a part of psychological analysis. It is this form of confession that can be discussed in the context of Garshin's work. This speech form in the text performs a psychological function.

The "Literary Encyclopedia of Terms and Concepts" defines confession as a work "in which the narration is conducted in the first person, and the narrator (the author himself or his hero) lets the reader into the innermost depths of his own spiritual life, trying to understand the" ultimate truth "about himself , his generation".

We find another definition of confession in the work of A.B. Krinitsyn, Confession of an Underground Man. To the anthropology of F.M. Dostoevsky" is "a work written in the first person and additionally endowed with at least one or more of the following features: 1) the plot contains many autobiographical motifs taken from the life of the writer himself; 2) the narrator often presents himself and his actions in a negative light; 3) the narrator describes his thoughts and feelings in detail, engaging in self-reflection. The researcher argues that the genre-forming basis of a literary confession is at least the hero's attitude to complete sincerity. According to A.B. Krinitsyn, for the writer, the key importance of confession lies in the ability to reveal the inner world of the hero to the reader without violating the artistic plausibility.

M.S. Uvarov notes: “The text of confession arises only when the need for repentance before God results in repentance before oneself.” The researcher points out that the confession is published, readable. According to M.S. Uvarov, the theme of the author's confession-in-hero is characteristic of Russian fiction, quite often confession becomes a sermon, and vice versa. The history of the confessional word demonstrates that confession is not instructive moral rules; rather, it provides an opportunity for "self-expression of the soul, which finds both joy and purification in the confessional act."

S.A. Tuzkov, I.V. Tuzkova note the presence of a subjective-confessional principle in Garshin's prose, which manifests itself "in those stories of Garshin, where the narration is in the form of the first person: a personified narrator, formally separated from the author, actually expresses his views on life ... . In the same stories of the writer, where the narration is conducted by a conditional narrator who does not enter directly into the depicted world, the distance between the author and the hero increases somewhat, but here, too, a significant place is occupied by the self-analysis of the hero, which is of a lyrical, confessional nature.

In the thesis of SI. Patrikeev "Confession in the Poetics of Russian Prose of the First Half of the 20th Century (Problems of Genre Evolution)" in the theoretical part, almost all aspects of this concept are indicated: the presence of moments of psychological "autobiography" in the structure of the text, the confessor's awareness of his own spiritual imperfection, his sincerity before God in the presentation of circumstances, accompanying the violation of certain Christian commandments and moral prohibitions.

Confession as a speech organization of the text is the dominant feature of the story "Night". Each monologue of the hero is filled with inner experiences. The story is told in a third person, Alexey Petrovich, his actions and thoughts are shown through the eyes of another person. The hero of the story analyzes his life, his "I", assessing the internal qualities, conducts a dialogue with himself, pronounces his thoughts: “He heard his voice; he no longer thought, but spoke aloud...”1 (p. 148). Turning to himself, trying to deal with his "I" through the verbal expression of internal impulses, at some point he loses a sense of reality, voices begin to speak in his soul: "... they said different things, and which of these voices belonged to him, his "I", he could not understand" (p. 143). Alexei Petrovich's desire to understand himself, to reveal even what characterizes him not from the best side, shows that he really speaks frankly, sincerely about himself.

Most of the story "Night" is occupied by the hero's monologues, his thoughts about the worthlessness of his existence. Alexei Petrovich decided to commit suicide, to shoot himself. The narrative is an in-depth introspection of the hero. Alexey Petrovich thinks about his life, tries to understand himself: “I went through everything in my memory, and it seems to me that I am right, that there is nothing to stop at, nowhere to put my foot to take the first step forward. Where to go? I don't know, but just get out of this vicious circle. There is no support in the past, because everything is a lie, everything is a deception ... ”(p. 143). The thought process of the hero appears before the reader's eyes. From the first lines, Alexey Petrovich clearly places the accents in his life. He talks to himself, voicing his actions, not fully understanding WHAT he is going to do. “Aleksey Petrovich took off his fur coat and was about to take a knife to open his pocket and take out the cartridges, but he came to his senses .... - Why work hard? One is enough. - Oh, yes, this tiny piece is very enough for everything to disappear forever. The whole world will disappear... . There will be no deception of oneself and others, there will be truth, the eternal truth of non-existence” (p. 148).

The psychological function of the "close-up"

The concept of close-up has not yet been clearly defined in literary criticism, although it is widely used by reputable scientists. Yu.M. Lotman says that “... close-ups and small shots exist not only in cinema. It is clearly felt in the literary narrative, when the same place or attention is given to phenomena of different quantitative characteristics. So, for example, if successive segments of the text are filled with content that is sharply different in quantitative terms: a different number of characters, whole and parts, descriptions of objects of large and small sizes; if in any novel in one chapter the events of the day are described, and in another - decades, then we are also talking about the difference in plans. The researcher gives examples from prose (L.N. Tolstoy "War and Peace") and poetry (N.A. Nekrasov "Morning").

V.E. Khalizeva in the book "Value Orientations of Russian Classics", dedicated to the poetics of the novel "War and Peace" by L.N. Tolstoy, we find the interpretation of "close-up" as a technique "where gazing and at the same time tactile-visual contact with reality is imitated" . We will rely on the book of E.G. Etkind ""Inner man" and external speech", where this concept is derived in the title of the part devoted to the work of Garshin. Using the results of the scientist's research, we will continue to observe the "close-up", which we will define as the shape of the image. “A close-up is what is seen, heard, felt, and even flashed through the mind.”

Thus, V.E. Khalizev and E.G. Etkind consider the concept of "close-up" from different angles.

In the work of E.G. Etkind convincingly proves the use of this form of representation in Garshin's story "Four Days". He refers to the category of the momentary, based on which he puts a direct demonstration of the inner person “at such moments when the hero, in essence, is deprived of the physical opportunity to comment on his experiences and when not only external speech, but also internal speech is unthinkable” .

In the book of E.G. Etkind gives a detailed analysis of Garshin's story "Four Days" based on the concepts of "close-up" and momentary. We would like to apply a similar approach to the story "From the Memoirs of Private Ivanov." Both narratives are brought together by the form of memories. This determines some of the features of the stories: in the foreground is the hero and his subjective assessment of the surrounding reality, "... however, the incompleteness of the facts and the almost inevitable one-sidedness of information are redeemed ... by the lively and direct expression of the personality of their author" .

In the story "Four Days" Garshin allows the reader to penetrate into the inner world of the hero, to convey his feelings through the prism of consciousness. Self-analysis of a soldier left forgotten on the battlefield allows one to penetrate into the sphere of his feelings, and a detailed description of the reality surrounding him helps to “see” the picture with his own eyes. The hero is in a serious condition, not only physical (injury), but also mental. The feeling of hopelessness, the understanding of the futility of his attempts to escape do not allow him to lose faith, the desire to fight for his life, even if instinctively, keeps him from committing suicide.

The attention of the reader (and perhaps already the viewer) follows the hero, focusing on individual pictures, which describe in detail his visual perception.

“...However, it's getting hot. The sun burns. I open my eyes, I see the same bushes, the same sky, only in daylight. And here is my neighbor. Yes, this is a Turk, a corpse. How huge! I recognize him, he's the one...

In front of me lies the man I killed. Why did I kill him?...” (p. 50).

This consistent fixation of attention on individual moments allows you to look at the world through the eyes of a hero.

Observing the “close-up” in the story “Four Days”, we can assert that the “close-up” in this narrative is voluminous, maximized due to the method of introspection, narrowing the time (four days) and spatial extension. In the story “From the Memoirs of Private Ivanov”, where the form of narration dominates - recollection, the “close-up” will be presented differently. In the text, one can see not only the inner state of the hero, but also the feelings and experiences of the people around him, in connection with this, the space of the events depicted is expanding. Private Ivanov's worldview is meaningful, there is some assessment of the chain of events. There are episodes in this story where the hero's consciousness is turned off (even if only partially) - it is in them that you can find a "close-up".

Narrative types (description, narration, reasoning)

G.Ya. Solganik distinguishes three functional and semantic types of speech: description, narration, reasoning. The description is divided into static (interrupts the development of the action) and dynamic (does not stop the development of the action, small in volume). G.Ya. Solganik points to the connection of the description with the place and situation of the action, the portrait of the hero (portrait, landscape, event description, etc. are allocated accordingly). He notes the important role of this functional-semantic type of speech for creating imagery in the text. The scientist emphasizes that the genre of the work and the individual style of the writer are important. According to G.Ya. Solganik, the peculiarity of the narration lies in the transfer of the event itself, the action: "The narration is closely connected with space and time" .

It can be objectified, neutral or subjective, in which the author's word prevails. Reasoning, as the researcher writes, is characteristic of psychological prose. It is in it that the inner world of the characters prevails, and their monologues are filled with thoughts about the meaning of life, art, moral principles, etc. Reasoning makes it possible to reveal the inner world of the hero, to demonstrate his view of life, people, the world around him. He believes that the presented functional-semantic types of speech in a literary text complement each other (narration with elements of description is most common).

With the advent of the works of O.A. Nechaeva in domestic science, the term “functional-semantic type of speech” is firmly fixed (“certain logical-semantic and structural types of monologue statements that are used as models in the process of verbal communication”). The researcher distinguishes four structural and semantic "descriptive genres": landscape, portrait of a person, interior (furnishings), characterization. O.A. Nechaeva notes that all of them are widely represented in fiction.

Let's reveal the narrative specifics of the description (landscape, portrait, setting, description-characteristics). In Garshin's prose, descriptions of nature are given little space, but nevertheless they are not devoid of narrative functions. Landscape sketches serve more as a background for the story. We must agree with G.A. Lobanova that the landscape is "a kind of description, an integral image of an open fragment of natural or urban space" .

These patterns are clearly manifested in Garshin's story "Bears", which begins with a lengthy description of the area. A landscape sketch precedes the story. It serves as a prologue to a sad story about the mass execution of bears who walked with the gypsies: “Below, the river, curving like a blue ribbon, stretches from north to south, then moving away from the high bank into the steppe, then approaching and flowing under the very steep. It is bordered by willow bushes, in some places by pine, and near the city by pastures and gardens. At some distance from the coast, towards the steppe, loose sands stretch in a continuous strip along almost the entire course of the Rokhli, barely restrained by red and black vines and a thick carpet of fragrant purple thyme ”(p. 175).

The description of nature is an enumeration of the features of the general view of the area (river, steppe, loose sands). These are permanent features that make up the topographic description. The listed signs are the key components of the description, which include key words (below, the river, towards the steppe, at some distance from the coast, along the entire course of the Rokhli, stretches from north to south).

In this description, there are verbs only in the form of the present constant tense (stretch, bordered) and the indicative mood. This happens because in the description, according to O.A. Nechaeva, there is no change in the time plan and the use of unreal modality, which lead to the appearance of dynamism in the text of a work of art (this is characteristic of narration). The landscape in the story is not only the place where events take place, it is also the starting point of the story. From this landscape sketch breathes serenity, silence, peace. The emphasis on this is done so that all further events related to the real killing of innocent animals are perceived by the reader "in contrast".

In the story "Red Flower" the writer gives a description of the garden, because the main events of the story will be connected with this place and the flower growing here. It is here that the main character will constantly pull. After all, he is absolutely sure that poppy flowers carry universal evil, and he is called upon to fight with him and destroy him, even at the cost of his own life: “Meanwhile, clear, good weather has come; ... Their branch of the garden, small but densely overgrown with trees, was planted with flowers wherever possible. ...

"Alien speech" and its narrative functions

MM. Bakhtin (V.N. Voloshinov) argues that ""alien speech"" is speech in speech, statement in statement, but at the same time it is speech about speech, statement about statement" . He believes that someone else's statement enters into speech and becomes its special constructive element, while maintaining its independence. The researcher characterizes the patterns of indirect, direct speech and their modifications. In the indirect construction of M.M. Bakhtin distinguishes subject-analytical (with the help of an indirect construction the subject composition of someone else's statement is conveyed - what the speaker said) and verbal-analytical (an alien statement is conveyed as an expression that characterizes the speaker himself: his state of mind, ability to express himself, speech manner, etc. ) modification. The scientist especially notes that in the Russian language there may also be a third modification of indirect speech - impressionistic. Its peculiarity is that it is somewhere in the middle between subject-analytical and verbal-analytical modifications. In the patterns of direct speech M.M. Bakhtin distinguishes the following modifications: prepared direct speech (a common case of the emergence of direct speech from indirect speech, weakening the objectivity of the author's context), reified direct speech (assessments saturated with its object content are transferred to the hero's words), anticipated, scattered and hidden direct speech (includes author's intonations , someone else's speech is being prepared). The scientist has a separate chapter of the book, which includes two speeches: the hero and the author), which is considered using examples from French, German and Russian.

ON THE. Kozhevnikov in the book "Types of Narrative in Russian Literature of the 19th-20th Centuries" offers his vision of the nature of the narrative in fiction. The researcher believes that the type of narrator (author or narrator), the point of view and the speech of the characters are of great importance for the compositional unity in the work. She notes: “A work can be one-dimensional, fitting within the framework of one narrative type (a story from the first person), and can go beyond a certain type, representing a multi-layered hierarchical construction” . ON THE. Kozhevnikova emphasizes: “foreign speech” can belong to both the sender (spoken, internal or written speech) and the recipient (perceived, heard or read speech). The researcher identifies three main forms for the transmission of someone else's speech in texts: direct, indirect, improperly direct, which we will study using the example of Garshin's prose.

I.V. Trufanova in the monograph "Pragmatics of improperly direct speech" emphasizes that in modern linguistics there is no single definition of the concept of improperly direct speech. The researcher dwells on the duality of the term and the interpenetration of the author’s and the hero’s plans in it, defining improperly direct speech as “a way of transmitting someone else’s speech, a two-plane syntactic construction in which the author’s plan does not exist separately from the plan of someone else’s speech, but is merged with it” .

Let us consider the narrative functions of direct speech, which is “a way of transmitting someone else's speech, preserving the lexical, syntactic, and intonational features of the speaker. It is important to note that "direct speech and the author's speech are clearly distinguished": - Live, brother! cried the doctor impatiently. - You see how many of you are here (“Batman and officer”, p. 157). - For what? For what? he shouted. I didn't want to harm anyone. For what. kill me? Ooo! Oh my God! O you who were tormented before me! I beg you, deliver me... (Red Flower, p. 235). - Leave me... Go wherever you want. I stay with Senya and now with mr. Lopatin. I want to take my soul... away from you! she suddenly cried out, seeing that Bessonov wanted to say something else. - You disgusted me. Leave, leave... (“Nadezhda Nikolaevna”, p. 271). - Ugh, brothers, what a people! And our priests and our churches, but they have no idea of ​​anything! Rupe silver do you want? - a soldier with a shirt in his hands shouts at the top of his lungs to a Romanian who sells in an open shop. . For a shirt? Patra Frank? Four francs? (“From the memoirs of Private Ivanov”, p. 216). "Hush, hush, please," she whispered. - You know, it's all over ("Coward", p. 85). - To Siberia!.. Can't I kill you because I'm afraid of Siberia? It's not because... I can't kill you because... but how can I kill you? How can I kill you? - panting, he uttered: - after all, I ... ("The Incident", p. 72). - Is it possible without such expressions! Vasily said sharply. Petrovich. - Give it to me, I'll hide it ("Meeting", p. 113).

The excerpts of direct speech cited from Garshin's prose contrast stylistically against the background of the author's neutral one. One of the functions of direct speech, according to G.Ya. Solganika is the creation of characters (characterological means). The author's monologue ceases to be monotonous.

Ivanov Semyon Ivanovich - the main character of the story "Signal" by Garshin. He is a former soldier, orderly. Semyon Ivanovich becomes a "watchman on the railroad." He lives, "a sick and broken man", together with his wife Arina in a booth, in which there is "half a dozen arable land." In Semyon's worldview, the eternal peasant attraction to the land is combined with the awareness of the responsibility of his new "iron" position. His philosophy: “to whom the Lord will give what talent-fate, it is so.”

Another of his neighbors in the distance is “a young man”, “thin and wiry”, Vasily Stepanovich Spiridov. He is convinced: “It is not the talent-fate that seizes us for a century, but people.<...>If you blame all filthiness on God, but sit and endure it yourself, then, brother, it’s not a man to be, but cattle.

Having quarreled with his superiors, Vasily leaves the service and goes to Moscow to seek "rule for himself." Obviously to no avail: a few days later he returns and unscrews the rail shortly before the arrival of the passenger train. Semyon notices this and tries to prevent the crash: he wets his handkerchief with his own blood and with such a red flag goes out to meet the train. He loses consciousness from severe bleeding, and then the flag is picked up by Vasily, who was watching what was happening from afar. The train is stopped. The last phrase of the story is the words of Vasily: "Knit me, I turned the rail off."

The story "Signal" by Garshin entered the circle of textbook reading of teenagers, but its interpretation by Soviet literary critics was rather simplified. To the on-duty and little content phrase that Garshin calls for “heroism, self-sacrifice for the good of the people” in “Signal”, was added the consideration that “Semyon is shown as a supporter of meek humility and is opposed to a person who passionately hates the masters of modern life. At the same time, a supporter of the struggle comes to a crime, and a preacher of humility - to the feat of self-sacrifice. Garshin is charged with following the “reactionary Tolstoy “theory” of “non-resistance to evil by violence”.

However, the content of the story testifies to somewhat different goals of the author: Vasily's conflicts with his superiors are often caused by his character, his rather free attitude to his own duties. And his crime is incommensurable with the insult inflicted on him. It seems that here Garshin follows not so much the “Tolstoyanism” not loved by the ideologists of Bolshevism and their relatives, but expresses a conviction that is generally characteristic of Russian writers of the 2nd half of the 19th century: any radicalism is destructive, it only brings evil and has no moral justification.

For the sake of affirming this idea, Garshin gives such a symbolic, in many ways literary finale in “Signal” (was it really necessary for Semyon to wet his handkerchief with blood?! Is it really that a person on the rails, waving any object, is not an alarm signal for the driver ?!) . Where radicalism is, there are crimes, there is the blood of innocent victims, the writer says. Decades later, the flag in Vasily’s hand, red from Semyon’s blood, began to express the meaning of the bloody radicalism of the 20th century in a fatal way. - Bolshevism, and the feat of Semyon itself revealed its heavy resemblance to the usual "feat" of the Soviet era: as a rule, this is self-sacrifice of some because of the criminality of others (and not opposition to the elements, etc.).

/ Nikolai Konstantinovich Mikhailovsky (1842-1904). About Vsevolod Garshin/

"Incident"- a story about how Ivan Ivanovich fell in love and committed suicide. He fell in love with Nadezhda Nikolaevna, a street woman who once knew better times, studied, took exams, remembers Pushkin and Lermontov, and so on. Misfortune pushed her onto a muddy road, and she got stuck in the mud. Ivan Ivanovich offers her his love, his home, his life, but she is afraid to impose these right bonds on herself, it seems to her that Ivan Ivanovich, despite all his love, will not forget her terrible past and that she has no return. Ivan Ivanovich, after some, however, too weak, attempts to dissuade her seems to agree with her, because he shoots himself.

The same motif, only in a much more complex and intricate plot, is repeated in Nadezhda Nikolaevna. This Nadezhda Nikolaevna, like the first one that appears in The Incident, is a cocotte. She also meets fresh, sincere love, she is overcome by the same doubts and hesitations, but she is already leaning towards a complete rebirth, when the bullet of a jealous former lover and some special weapon of the one who calls her to a new life, cut off this romance with two deaths.

"Meeting". Old comrades Vasily Petrovich and Nikolai Konstantinovich, who have long lost sight of each other, suddenly meet. Vasily Petrovich once dreamed "of a professorship, of journalism, of a big name, but he was not enough for all this, and he puts up with the role of a gymnasium teacher. He puts up, but treats his new role as an impeccably honest person: he will be exemplary teacher, will sow the seeds of goodness and truth, in the hope that someday in his old age he will see in his students the embodiment of his own youthful dreams. But then he meets with his old comrade Nikolai Konstantinovich. This is a bird of a completely different flight. of this building so skillfully warms his hands that, with an empty salary, he lives in even improbable luxury (he has an aquarium in his apartment, in some respects rivaling that of Berlin). theoretically convinced of the legitimacy of swine, he also tries to convert Vasily Petrovich to his faith.It cannot be said that his argumentation is distinguished by irresistible force, but Vasily Petrovich parries his arguments even weaker. So in the end, although the piggy of Nikolai Konstantinovich is fully revealed, but at the same time his shameless and desolate prophecy is firmly imprinted in the mind of the reader: “Three-quarters of your pupils will come out the same as me, and one quarter will be like you, that is, a well-intentioned slob."

"Artists". The artist Dedov is a representative of pure art. He loves art for its own sake and thinks that to introduce burning worldly motives into it, disturbing the peace of mind, means dragging art through the mud. He thinks (strange thought!), that just as in music dissonances, cutting the ear, unpleasant sounds are unacceptable, so in painting, in art there is no place at all for unpleasant plots. But he gives gifts and goes safely to the doors leading to the temple of glory, orders and Olympic peace of mind. The artist Ryabinin is not like that. He, apparently, is more gifted than Dedov, but he has not created an idol for himself out of pure art, he is also occupied with other things. Having stumbled almost by chance on one scene from the life of factory workers, or rather, even on one figure only, he began to paint it and experienced so much during this work, he got into the position of his subject so much that he stopped painting when he finished the picture. He was drawn somewhere else, to another job, with irresistible force. For the first time, he entered the teacher's seminary. What happened to him next is unknown, but the author certifies that Ryabinin "did not succeed" ...

As you can see, a whole series of misfortunes and whole prospects of hopelessness: good intentions remain intentions, and what the author apparently sympathizes with remains behind the flag.<...>

Chapter 1. Forms of psychological analysis in the prose of V.M. Garshina

1.1. Artistic nature of confession.24

1.2. The psychological function of the "close-up" .38

1.3. Psychological function of portrait, landscape, environment 48

Chapter 2. Poetics of Narrative in V.M. Garshina

2.1 Types of narration (description, narration, reasoning).62

2.2. "Alien speech" and its narrative functions.98

2.3. Functions of the narrator and narrator in the writer's prose.110

2.4. The point of view in the narrative structure and the poetics of psychologism.130

Introduction to the thesis (part of the abstract) on the topic “Poetics of V.M. Garshin: psychologism and narration»

Unrelenting interest in the prose of V.M. Garshin indicates that this area of ​​research remains very relevant for modern science. And although scientists are much more often attracted by the work of writers of the “older” generation (I.S. Turgenev, F.M. Dostoevsky, L.N. Tolstoy, etc.), Garshin’s prose, a master of psychological storytelling, also rightfully enjoys the attention of literary critics and critics .

The writer's work is an object of study from the standpoint of different trends and literary schools. However, in this research diversity, three main approaches stand out, each of which brings together a whole group of scientists.

The first group should include researchers who consider Garshin's work in the context of his biography. Describing the prose writer's writing style in general, they analyze his works in chronological order, correlating certain "shifts" in poetics with the stages of his creative path. In studies of the second direction, Garshin's work is covered mainly in a comparative aspect. The third group consists of the works of those researchers who focused their attention on the study of individual elements of the poetics of Garshi's prose.

The first ("biographical") approach to Garshin's work is represented by the works of G.A. Byalogo, N.Z. Belyaeva, A.N. Latinina and others. The biographical studies of these authors describe the life path and literary activity of Garshin in general. So, N.Z. Belyaev in the book "Garshin" (1938), characterizing the writer as a master of the novelistic genre, notes the "rare writer's conscientiousness" with which Garshin "worked on his works, polishing every word." This task the prose writer, according to the researcher, "considered the most important task of the writer." Following it, he “thrown out” “heaps of waste paper” from his stories, removed “all the ballast, everything superfluous that could interfere with the reading of the work, its perception” . Paying increased attention to the links between Garshin's biography and work, N.Z. Belyaev, at the same time, believes that it is impossible to put an equal sign between literary activity and the writer's mental illness. According to the author of the book, the "gloom" of some of Garshin's works is most likely a consequence of his sensitivity to manifestations of evil and violence in society.

The author of another biographical study is G.A. Byaly (Vsevolod Mikhailovich Garshin, 1969) focuses on understanding the socio-political conditions that determined the nature of the work and the personal fate of the prose writer, notes the influence of the Turgenev and Tolstoy traditions on the literary activity of the writer. The scientist in particular emphasizes the social orientation and psychologism of Garshi's prose. In his opinion, the writer's creative task "was to combine the image of the inner world of people who acutely feel personal responsibility for the untruth prevailing in society, with broad pictures of the everyday life of the "big outside world"" . G.A. Byaly analyzes not only prose, but also Garshin's articles on painting, which are of fundamental importance for understanding the writer's aesthetic views, as well as for studying his works related to the theme of art (the stories "Artists", "Nadezhda Nikolaevna").

Written in the mid-1980s, the book by A.N. Latynina (1986), is a synthesis of biography and analysis of the writer's work. This is a solid work, containing a huge number of references to various studies. A.N. Latynina largely abandons the social accents characteristic of the works of earlier biographers and approaches Garshin's work primarily from a psychological point of view. The researcher explains the features of the writer's creative manner by the originality of his mental organization, which, in her opinion, determined both the strengths and weaknesses of Garshin's literary talent. “In this amazing ability to reflect someone else's pain,” says A.N. Latynin, is the source of that genuine sincerity that gives such a sad charm to Garshin's prose, but here is also the source of the limitations of his writing gift. Tears prevent him from looking at the world from the outside (which an artist should be able to do), he is not able to understand people of a different organization than his own, and if he makes such attempts, they fail. Only one hero seems impeccably alive in Garshin's prose - a person close to his own mental warehouse.

Among the comparative studies that offer attention. the reader's comparison of Garshin's works with the work of one of his predecessors, one should first of all name the article by N.V. Kozhukhovskaya "Tolstoy's tradition in the military stories of V.M. Garshin" (1992). The researcher, in particular, notes that in the minds of Garshin's characters (as well as in the minds of Leo Tolstoy's characters) there is no "protective psychological reaction" that would allow them not to suffer from guilt and personal responsibility.

Works in Garshin studies of the second half of the 20th century are devoted to comparing the work of Garshin and F.M. Dostoevsky. Among them is an article by F.I. Evnin “F.M. Dostoevsky and V.M. Garshin" (1962), as well as G.A. Skleinis “Typology of characters in the novel by F.M. Dostoevsky "The Brothers Karamazov" and in the stories of V.M. Garshin in the 80s. (1992). The authors of these works note the influence of Dostoevsky on the ideological and thematic orientation of Garshin's stories, emphasize the similarity in the construction of plots and in the characterology of the prose of both authors. F.I. Evnin, in particular, points to "elements of ideological closeness" in the works of writers, including "tragic perception of the environment, increased interest in the world of human suffering", etc. . The literary critic reveals in the prose of Garshin and F.M. Dostoevsky, there are signs of increased stylistic expressiveness, explaining them by the generality of the psychological sphere depicted by the writers: and F.M. Dostoevsky and Garshin, as a rule, show the life of the subconscious in a situation “at the last line”, when the hero plunges into his inner world in order to understand himself “on the verge”. As Garshin himself pointed out, “The Incident” is “something from Dostoevism. It turns out that I am inclined and able to develop his (D.) way.

Garshin's prose is also compared by some researchers with the work of I.S. Turgenev and N.V. Gogol. So, A. Zemlyakovskaya (1968) in the article "Turgenev and Garshin" notes a number of common features in the work of Garshin and I.S. Turgenev (type of hero, style, genres - including the genre of poetry in prose). According to A.A. Bezrukov (1988), N.V. Gogol also had an aesthetic and moral influence on the writer: “Gogol’s belief in the highest social purpose of literature, his passionate desire to help the revival of the human personality<.>- all this activated Garshin's creative thought, contributed to the formation of his "humanistic views, nourished the optimism of" Red Flower "and" Signal "". Following N.V. Gogol, the researcher believes, Garshin "spiritualizes" art, opposing the pursuit of external artistic He, like the author of "Dead Souls", counts in his work on the effect of a moral shock, believing that an emotional shake-up will give impetus to the "reorganization" of people themselves and the whole world.

The third group of literary scholars and critics writing about Garshin includes, as already noted, authors who have chosen as their subject the analysis of individual elements of the writer's poetics. The "initiator" of this direction can be considered N.K. "(1885) gave an interesting "report" on the writer's prose. Despite the ironic style, the article contains many subtle observations on the names of the characters, the narrative form of Garshin's works and the plot structure of his stories. N.K. Mikhailovsky notes the writer's individual approach to military topics.

Psychologism and narration in Garshin's work have been studied by few researchers. More V.G. Korolenko, in an essay on Garshin's work, points out: “Garshin's time is far from history. And in the works of Garshin, the main motives of this time acquired that artistic and psychological completeness, which ensures their long existence in literature. V.G. Korolenko believes that the writer reflects the characteristic moods of his time.

In 1894 a certain subjectivity in Garshin's prose was seen by Yu.N. The talker-Otrok, who noted “Garshin and reflected in his works the feelings and thoughts of his generation - dull, sick and powerless.<.>In the works of Garshin there is truth, but not the whole truth, much but the truth. The truth of these works is only in their sincerity: Garshin presents the matter as it appears to him in the depths of his soul. .

In the first half of the 20th century (since 1925), interest in the study of the life and work of the writer increased. Particular attention should be paid to Yu.G. Oksman, who did a great job in publishing the writer's unpublished works and letters. The researcher gives detailed comments and notes to Garshin's letters. Studying archival materials, Yu.G. Oksman reflects in detail the political and social life of the 70-80s of the XIX century. Separately, the scientist specifies the sources of publications, the places of storage of autographs and copies, and gives basic bibliographic information about the addressees.

In the first half of the XX century. Several articles were published on the study of Garshin's life-creativity. P.F. speaks about the deep introspection of the writer’s hero, the dissection of his inner world. Yakubovich (1910): “Scourge of the “man”, exposing our inner abomination, the weakness of our best aspirations, Mr. Garshin, with particular detail, with the patient’s strange love for his pains, dwells on the most terrible crime that lies on the conscience of modern mankind, the war » .

So V.N. writes about the influence of content on form. Arkhangelsky (1929), defining the form of the writer's works as a short psychological story. The researcher focuses on the psychological appearance of the hero, who "is characterized by extreme nervous imbalance with its external manifestations: sensitivity, longing, consciousness of one's powerlessness and loneliness, a tendency to introspection and fragmentary thinking" .

C.B. Shuvalov in his work (1931) retains an interest in Garshin's suffering personality and speaks of the writer's desire to "reveal a person's experiences," tell his soul ", i.e. [interest] determines the psychologism of creativity.” .

Of particular interest to us is the dissertation research of V.I. Shubin “The mastery of psychological analysis in the work of V.M. Garshin" (1980). In our observations, we relied on his conclusions that the distinguishing feature of the writer's stories is ". internal energy that requires a short and lively expression, the psychological richness of the image and the entire narrative.<.>The moral and social issues that permeate all of Garshin's work have found their vivid and deep expression in the method of psychological analysis based on the comprehension of the value of the human personality, the moral principle in a person's life and his social behavior. In addition, we took into account the research results of the third chapter of the work “Forms and means of psychological analysis in the stories of V.M. Garshin”, in which V.I. Shubin distinguishes five forms of psychological analysis: internal monologue, dialogue, dreams, portrait and landscape. Supporting the conclusions of the researcher, we nevertheless note that we consider the portrait and landscape in a wider, from the point of view of the poetics of psychologism, functional range.

Various aspects of the poetics of Garshin's prose have already been analyzed by the authors of the collective study “Poetics of V.M. Garshin” (1990) Yu.G. Milyukov, P. Henry and others. The book touches upon, in particular, the problems of theme and form (including types of narration and types of lyricism), images of the hero and the “counterhero”, considers the writer’s impressionistic style and the “artistic mythology” of individual works, raises the question of the principles for studying Garshin’s unfinished stories ( reconstruction problem). Researchers ascertain the general direction of the genre evolution of Garshin the prose writer: from a social essay to a moral and philosophical parable; emphasize the importance of the technique of "diary entries" and the "hero-counterhero" plot scheme, which, in their opinion, is not a simple imitation of the "two worlds" of romantics. The study rightly emphasizes the significance of the story "Red Flower", in which the writer managed to achieve an organic synthesis of the impressionistic writing technique and an objective (in the spirit of realism) reproduction of the spiritual makeup of the Russian intelligentsia of the 1870s - 80s. In general, the book makes an important contribution to the study of Garshin's prose, however, significant elements of poetics are still analyzed in it not in a complex, but separately, selectively - without indicating their common connection in the unity of the author's creative manner.

Separately, one should dwell on the three-volume collection "Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century" ("Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century"), which presents research by scientists from different countries (Bulgaria, Great Britain, Germany, Russia, Ukraine, etc.). The authors of the collection develop various aspects of poetics (S.N. Kaidash-Lakshina "The image of a "fallen woman" in the work of Garshin", E.M. Sventsitskaya "The concept of personality and conscience in the work of Vs. Garshin", Yu.B. Orlitsky "Poems in prose in the work of V. M. Garshin ", etc.). Foreign researchers acquaint us with the problems of translating the writer's prose into English (M. Dewhirst

Three Translations of Garshin "s Story "Three Red Flowers" ", etc.). V. Kostrica in the article "The reception of Vsevolod Garshin in Czechoslovakia" notes that the writer's works during his lifetime (starting from 1883) were published in twenty different translations, Garshin's prose especially attracted Czech publishers by the volume of stories and their genre character.The collection "Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century" deserves special attention of scientists studying the literary activity of the writer.

As we can see, the problems of the poetics of Garshin's prose occupy an important place in the studies devoted to the work of this writer. However, most of the research is still of a private, episodic nature. Some aspects of the poetics of Garshin's prose (including narrative poetics and the poetics of psychologism) remain almost unexplored. In those works that come close to these problems, it is more about posing the question than about solving it, which in itself is an incentive for further comprehensive research in this direction. In this regard, the identification of forms of psychological analysis and the main components of the poetics of narration can be considered relevant, which allows us to come close to the problem of the structural combination of psychologism and narration in Garshin's prose.

The scientific novelty of the work is determined by the fact that for the first time a consistent consideration of the poetics of psychologism and narration in Garshin's prose, which is the most characteristic feature of the writer's prose, is proposed. A systematic approach to the study of Garshin's work is presented. The supporting categories in the poetics of the writer's psychologism (confession, "close-up", portrait, landscape, setting) are revealed. Such narrative forms in Garshin's prose as description, narration, reasoning, other people's speech (direct, indirect, improperly direct), points of view, categories of the narrator and narrator are defined.

The subject of the study are eighteen stories by Garshin.

The purpose of the dissertation research is to identify and analytically describe the main artistic forms of psychological analysis in Garshin's prose and systematic study of its narrative poetics. The research super-task is to demonstrate how the connection between the forms of psychological analysis and narration is carried out in the writer's prose works.

In accordance with the goal, the specific objectives of the study are determined:

1. consider the confession in the poetics of the author's psychologism;

2. to determine the functions of "close-up", portrait, landscape, environment in the poetics of the writer's psychologism;

3. to study the poetics of narrative in the works of the writer, to identify the artistic function of all narrative forms;

4. to identify the functions of "foreign word" and "point of view" in Garshin's narrative;

5. describe the functions of the narrator and narrator in the writer's prose.

The methodological and theoretical basis of the dissertation are the literary works of A.P. Auera, M.M. Bakhtin, Yu.B. Boreva, L.Ya. Ginzburg, A.B. Esina, A.B. Krinitsyna, Yu.M. Lotman, Yu.V. Manna, A.P. Skaftymova, N.D. Tamarchenko, B.V. Tomashevsky,

M.S. Uvarova, B.A. Uspensky, V.E. Khalizeva, V. Schmid, E.G. Etkind, as well as the linguistic studies of V.V. Vinogradova, H.A. Kozhevnikova, O A. Nechaeva, G.Ya. Solganika. Based on the works of these scientists and the achievements of modern narratology, a methodology of immanent analysis was developed, which makes it possible to reveal the artistic essence of a literary phenomenon in full accordance with the author's creative aspiration. The main methodological reference point for us was the "model" of immanent analysis, presented in the work of A.P. Skaftymov "Thematic composition of the novel "The Idiot"".

The key concept used in the dissertation work is psychologism, which is an important achievement of Russian classical literature and characterizes the individual poetics of the writer. The origins of psychologism can be found in ancient Russian literature. Here one should recall the life as a genre (“The Life of Archpriest Avvakum”), where the hagiographer “. created a living image of the hero<.>colored the story with a range of different moods, interrupted it with waves of lyricism - internal and external. It is worth noting that this is one of the first attempts in Russian prose; psychologism as a phenomenon is only outlined here.

The psychological image was further developed in the late 18th - early 19th centuries. Sentimentalism and romanticism singled out a person from the mass, the crowd. The view of the literary character has qualitatively changed, there is a tendency to search for personality, individuality. Sentimentalists and romantics turned to the sensual sphere of the hero, trying to convey his experiences and emotions (N.M. Karamzin "Poor Liza", A.N. Radishchev "Journey from St. Petersburg to Moscow", etc.).

In full measure, psychologism as a literary concept manifests itself in realism (F.M. Dostoevsky, L.N. Tolstoy, A.P. Chekhov). The psychological image becomes dominant in the work of realist writers. It is not just the view of a person that is changing, the authors have a different approach to revealing the inner world of their heroes, forms, techniques and ways of depicting the inner world of heroes are revealed.

V.V. Kompaneets notes that "the developed element of psychologism is the key to artistic knowledge of the inner world, the entire emotional and intellectual sphere of the individual in its complex and multilateral conditionality by the phenomena of the surrounding world" . In the article "Artistic psychologism as a research problem" he separates the two concepts "psychologism" and "psychological analysis", which are not fully synonymous. The concept of psychologism is broader than the concept of psychological analysis, it includes the reflection of the author's psychology in the work. The author of the article emphasizes that the writer does not decide the question: to be psychologism in the work or to be absent. Psychological analysis, in turn, has a number of means directed at the object. The conscious attitude of the author of the work of art is already present here.

In the work "Psychology of Russian classical literature" A.B. , Esin notes "special depth" in the artistic development of the inner world of a person by "writers-psychologists". He especially considers F.M. Dostoevsky, L.N. Tolstoy, since the artistic world of their works is marked by the utmost attention to the inner life of the characters, to the process of movement of their thoughts, feelings, sensations. A.B. Esin notes that “it makes sense to talk about psychologism as a special, qualitatively defined phenomenon that characterizes the originality of the style of a given work of art only when a form of direct depiction of the processes of inner life appears in literature, when literature begins to adequately depict (and not only designate) such mental and mental processes that do not find an external expression for themselves, when - accordingly - new compositional and narrative forms appear in literature, capable of capturing the hidden phenomena of the inner world quite naturally and adequately. The researcher claims that psychologism makes external details work on the image of the inner world. Objects and events motivate the state of mind of the hero, affect the features of his thinking. A.B. Yesin identifies a psychological description (reproduces a static feeling, mood, but not a thought) and a psychological narrative (the subject of the image is the dynamics of thoughts, emotions, desires).

However, the image of a person and everything connected with him distinguishes any writer of the era of artistic realism. Such artists of the word as I.S. Turgenev, I.A. Goncharov, A.N. Ostrovsky has always been distinguished by his human skill. But they revealed the inner world of the hero in different ways, using different psychological techniques and means.

In the works “Ideas and Forms in the Works of L. Tolstoy” and “On Psychologism in the Works of Stendhal and L. Tolstoy” A.P. Skaftymov we find the concept of psychological drawing. The scientist determines the mental content of the characters in the work of L.N. Tolstoy, noting the writer's desire to show the inner world of a person in his process as a constant, continuous flow. A.P. Skaftymov notes the characteristic features of L.N. Tolstoy: “cohesion, inseparability of external and internal being, the diverse complexity of mutually intersecting psychological lines, the continuous relevance of the mental elements given to the character, in a word, that “dialectic of the soul”, which forms a continuous individual stream of running collisions, contradictions, always caused and complicated by the closest connections of the psyche with the environment of the current moment.

V.E. Khalizev writes that psychologism is expressed in the work through "individualized reproduction of the characters' experiences in their interconnection, dynamics and originality" . The researcher speaks of two forms of psychological representation: explicit, open, “demonstrative” psychologism is characteristic of F.M. Dostoevsky, L.N. Tolstoy; implicit, secret, "subtextual" - I.S. Turgenev, A.P. Chekhov. The first form of psychologism is associated with introspection, the internal monologue of the character, as well as with the psychological analysis of the hero's inner world, which is carried out by the author himself. The second form is manifested in an implicit indication of certain processes occurring in the soul of the character, with the mediation of the reader's perception.

V.V. Gudonienė considers psychologism as a special quality of literature and problems of its poetics. In the theoretical part, the researcher analyzes the literary character as a psychological reality (the attention of writers is not to the character, but to the personality, the universal nature of individuality); interpenetration of forms of psychological writing (interest in portrait description, author's commentary on the character's state of mind, use of improperly direct speech, internal monologue), F. Shtanzel's circle as a set of basic methods of narration, means of psychological writing, landscape, dreams and daydreams, artistic detail, etc. etc. In the practical part, based on the material of Russian literature (prose and lyrics), V.V. Gudonene applies the developed theory on the texts of I.S. Turgenev, F.M. Dostoevsky, L.N. Tolstoy, I.A. Bunina, M.I. Tsvetaeva and others. The author of the book emphasizes that psychologism has been actively studied in recent decades; Each literary epoch has its own forms of psychological analysis; the most studied are portraits, landscapes, and internal monologues as means of psychological writing.

In the first chapter we analyze the forms of psychological analysis: confession, close-up, portrait and landscape. The theoretical basis for studying the concept of confession is the work of A.B. Krinitsyn, Confession of an Underground Man. To the anthropology of F.M. Dostoevsky ", M.S. Uvarov "Architectonics of the confessional word", in which the characteristic features of the narrator, the features of the presentation of inner experiences are noted.

E.G. Etkind in his work “Inner Man and External Speech” speaks of psychopoetics as “a field of philology that considers the relationship between thought and word, and the term “thought” here and below means not only a logical conclusion (from causes to effects or from consequences to causes), not only the rational process of understanding (from the essence of the phenomenon and vice versa), but also the totality of the inner life of a person. The scientist defines the concept of "inner man", by which he understands "the diversity and complexity of the processes occurring in the soul". E.G. Etkind demonstrates the relationship between the speech of the characters and their spiritual world.

Fundamental for the dissertation research (for the first chapter) are the concepts of "close-up" and "momentary", the essence of which is revealed in the work of the scientist. Important works in the study of the concept of "close-up" were also the works of Yu.M. Lotman "On Art", V.E. Khalizeva "Value Orientations of Russian Classics".

Psychologism reveals itself in full measure in realism. The psychological image really becomes the dominant feature in the work of many writers. The view of a person is changing, the authors have a different approach to depicting the psychology of their heroes, their inner world, revealing and focusing on its complexity, inconsistency, maybe even inexplicability, in a word - depth.

The second main term in the dissertation research is “narration”, which is understood quite widely in modern literary criticism. The following definitions of "narrative" can be found in dictionaries:

Narration, in an epic literary work, the speech of the author, personified narrator, narrator, i.e. all text except for the direct speech of the characters. Narration, which is a depiction of actions and events in time, description, reasoning, improperly direct speech of heroes, is the main way to build an epic work that requires an objective-event reproduction of reality.<.>Consistent deployment, interaction, combination of "points of view" forms the composition of the narrative.

Narration - the entire text of an epic literary work, with the exception of direct speech (the voices of characters can be included in the narration only in the form of various forms, improper direct speech).

Narration - 1) a set of fragments of the text of an epic work (compositional forms of speech) attributed by the author-creator to one of the "secondary" subjects of image and speech (narrator, narrator) and performing "intermediary" (connecting the reader with the world of characters) functions; 2) the process of communication of the narrator or narrator with the reader, the purposeful deployment of the "event of storytelling", which is carried out due to the reader's perception of the indicated fragments, the text in their sequence organized by the author.

N.D. Tamarchenko stipulates that, in a narrow sense, narration is one of the typical forms of utterance along with description and characterization. The researcher notes the duality of the concept, on the one hand, it includes special functions: informativeness, focus on the subject of speech, on the other hand, more general, up to compositional, functions, for example, focus on the text. N.D. Tamarchenko speaks of the connection between the terminology of Russian literary criticism "with the "theory, literature" of the last century, which in turn relied on the doctrine developed by classical rhetoric about such compositional forms of constructing prose speech as narration, description and reasoning" .

Yu.B. Borev notes two meanings of the concept of narration: “1) a coherent presentation of real or fictional events, an artistic prose work; 2) one of the intonation universals of the narrative. The researcher distinguishes four forms of the transmission of artistic information in prose: the first form is a panoramic view (the presence of an omniscient author); the second form is the presence of a narrator who is not omniscient, a story from the first person; the third form is dramatized consciousness, the fourth form is pure drama. Yu.B. Borev mentions the fifth "variable form", when the narrator either becomes omniscient, or a participant in events, or merges with the hero and his consciousness.

In the second chapter, we focus on four narrative forms: types of narration (description, narration, reasoning), “alien speech”, subjects of image and speech (narrator and narrator), point of view. The linguistic work of O.A. Nechaeva “Functional-semantic types of speech (narration, description, reasoning)”, which proposes classifications of description (landscape, portrait, setting, description-characteristic), narration (specific stage, generalized stage, information), reasoning (evaluative nominal , with the meaning of the state, with the justification of real or hypothetical actions, with the meaning of necessity, with conditioned actions, with categorical negation or affirmation). The researcher defines the term narration in the text of a work of art as follows: “a functional-semantic type of speech that expresses a message about developing actions or states and has specific language means for the implementation of this function” .

When studying “foreign speech”, we focus primarily on the works of M.M. Bakhtin (V.N. Voloshinova) “Marxism and the Philosophy of Language” and H.A. Kozhevnikova "Types of Narrative in Russian Literature of the 19th-20th Centuries" , in which researchers identify three main forms for the transmission of "alien speech" (direct, indirect, improperly direct) and demonstrate its features using examples from fiction.

Exploring the subjects of image and speech in Garshin's prose, in theoretical terms, we rely on the work of H.A. Kozhevnikova "Types of Narrative in Russian Literature of the 19th-20th Centuries" , candidate dissertation research by A.F. Moldavsky "Storyteller as a theoretical and literary category (based on Russian prose of the 20s of the XX century)", articles by K.N. Atarova, G.A. Lesskis "Semantics and structure of first-person narrative in fiction", "Semantics and structure of third-person narrative in fiction". In these works, we find features of the image of the narrator and the narrator in literary texts.

Turning to the problem of studying the point of view in literary criticism, in our study, the central work is the work of B.A. Uspensky "Poetics of composition". The literary critic emphasizes: in fiction there is a montage technique (as in cinema), a plurality of points of view is manifested (as in painting). B.A. Ouspensky believes that there may be a general theory of composition applicable to various art forms. The scientist distinguishes the following types of points of view: "point of view" in terms of ideology, "point of view" in terms of phraseology, "point of view" in terms of spatio-temporal characteristics, "point of view" in terms of psychology.

In addition, when exploring the concept of point of view, we take into account the experience of Western literary criticism, in particular, the work of V. Schmid "Narratology", in which the researcher defines the concept of point of view as "a knot of conditions formed by external and internal factors that affect the perception and transmission of incidents" . V. Schmid identifies five planes in which a point of view is manifested: perceptual, ideological, spatial, temporal, and linguistic.

The theoretical significance of the work lies in the fact that on the basis of the results obtained, an opportunity is created to deepen the scientific understanding of the poetics of psychologism and the structure of narration in Garshin's prose. The conclusions made in the work can serve as a basis for further theoretical study of Garshin's work in modern literary criticism.

The practical significance of the work lies in the fact that its results can be used in the development of a course in the history of Russian literature of the 19th century, special courses and special seminars dedicated to Garshin's work. Dissertation materials can be included in an elective course for classes in the humanities in a secondary school.

Approbation of work. The main provisions of the dissertation research were presented in scientific reports at conferences: at the X Vinogradov Readings (GOU VPO MGPU. 2007, Moscow); XI Vinogradov Readings (GOU VPO MGPU, 2009, Moscow); X conference of young philologists "Poetics and comparative studies" (GOU VPO MO "KSPI", 2007, Kolomna). 5 articles were published on the topic of the study, including two in publications included in the list of the Higher Attestation Commission of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia.

The structure of the work is determined by the goals and objectives of the study. The dissertation consists of an Introduction, two chapters, a Conclusion and a list of references. The first chapter discusses in turn

Dissertation conclusion on the topic "Russian literature", Vasina, Svetlana Nikolaevna

Conclusion

In conclusion, I would like to sum up the results of the study, which only outlined the problem of studying narrative and artistic, psychologism in Garshin's prose. The writer is of special interest to the researcher of Russian literature. As noted in the introduction, psychologism and narration in Garshin's stories have been analyzed in the works of a few researchers. At the beginning of the dissertation work, the following tasks were set: "to consider confession in the poetics of the author's psychologism; to determine the functions of a close-up, portrait, landscape, setting in the poetics of the writer's psychologism; to study the poetics of narration in the writer's works, to identify the artistic function of all narrative forms; to identify the functions " someone else's word" and "point of view" in Garshin's narration; describe the functions of the narrator and the narrator in the writer's prose.

Studying the poetics of psychologism in the works of the writer, we analyze confession, close-up, portrait, landscape, setting. The analysis shows that the elements of confession contribute to a deep penetration into the inner world of the hero. It was revealed that in the story "Night" the hero's confession becomes the main form of psychological analysis. In other prose works of the writer (“Four Days”, “The Incident”, “Coward”), she is not given a central place, she becomes only part of the poetics of psychologism, but a very important part, interacting with other forms of psychological analysis.

Close-up" in Garshin's prose is presented: a) in the form of "detailed descriptions with comments of an evaluative and analytical nature ("From the Memoirs of Private Ivanov"); b) when describing dying people, the reader's attention is drawn to the inner world, the psychological state of the hero, located nearby ("Death", "Coward"); c) in the form of a list of the actions of the heroes who perform them at the moment when consciousness is turned off ("Signal", "Nadezhda Nikolaevna").

Analyzing portrait, landscape sketches, description of the situation in Garshin's prose works, we see that they enhance the author's emotional impact on the reader, visual perception and largely contribute to the identification of the inner movements of the characters' souls. The landscape is more connected with the chronotope, but in the poetics of psychologism it also occupies a fairly strong position due to the fact that in some cases it becomes the “mirror of the soul” of the hero. Garshin's heightened interest in the inner world of a person "in many ways determined the image of the world around him in his works. As a rule, small landscape fragments woven into the experiences of the characters and the description of events are complicated in his stories by psychological sound.

It was revealed that the interior (furnishings) performs a psychological function in the stories "Night", "Nadezhda Nikolaevna", "Coward". When depicting an interior, it is typical for a writer to concentrate his attention on individual objects, things (“Nadezhda Nikolaevna”, “Coward”). In this case, we can speak of a passing, condensed description of the situation.

In the process of analyzing Garshin's stories, three types of narration are considered: description, narration and reasoning. We prove that description is an important part of Garshin's narrative poetics. The most characteristic in the structure of the description are four “descriptive genres” (O.A. Nechaeva): landscape, portrait, setting, characterization. The description (landscape, portrait, setting) is characterized by the use of a single time plan, the use of the real (indicative) mood, and the use of key words that carry the function of enumeration. In the portrait, when describing the external features of the characters, nominal parts of speech (nouns and adjectives) are actively used for expressiveness. In the description-characteristic, it is possible to use verb forms of different times (combining the past and present tenses), it is also possible to use an unreal mood, in particular the subjunctive (the story "Batman and Officer").

In Garshin's prose, descriptions of nature are given little space, but nevertheless they are not devoid of narrative functions. Landscape sketches serve more as a background for the story. These patterns are clearly manifested in the story "Bears", which begins with a lengthy description of the area. A landscape sketch precedes the story. The description of nature is an enumeration of the features of the general view of the area (river, steppe, loose sands). These are permanent features that make up the topographic description. In the main part, the depiction of nature in Garshin's prose is episodic. As a rule, these are short passages, consisting of one to three sentences.

In Garshin's stories, the description of the external features of the hero undoubtedly helps to show their inner, mental state. The story "The Orderly and the Officer" presents one of the most detailed portrait descriptions. It should be noted that most of Garshin's stories are characterized by a completely different description of the characters' appearance. The writer focuses the reader's attention, rather, on the details.

Therefore, it is logical to talk about a compressed, incidental portrait in prose, Garshin. Portrait characteristics are included in the poetics of the narrative. They reflect both permanent and temporary, momentary external features of the characters.

Separately, it should be said about the description of the hero's costume as a detail of his portrait. Garshin's costume is both a social and psychological characteristic of a person. The author describes the clothes of the character if he wants to emphasize the fact that his characters follow the fashion of that time, and this, in turn, speaks of their financial situation, financial capabilities and some character traits. Garshin also deliberately draws the reader's attention to the clothes of the hero, if it is an unusual life situation or a costume for a celebration, a special occasion. Such narrative gestures contribute to the fact that the clothes of the hero become part of the poetics of the writer's psychologism.

To describe the situation in Garshin's prose works, the static nature of objects is characteristic. In the story "Meeting" descriptions of the situation play a key role. Garshin focuses the reader's attention on the material from which things are made. This is significant: Kudryashov surrounds himself with expensive things, which is mentioned several times in the text of the work, so it is important what they were made of. All things in the house, like the whole environment, are a reflection of the philosophical concept of "predation" Kudryashov.

Descriptions-characteristics are found in three stories by Garshin "Batman and officer", "Nadezhda Nikolaevna", "Signal". The characterization of Stebelkov (“Batman and Officer”), one of the main characters, includes both biographical information and facts that reveal the essence of his character (passivity, primitiveness, laziness). This monologue characteristic is a description with elements of reasoning. Completely different characteristics are given to the main characters of the stories "Signal" and "Nadezhda Nikolaevna" (diary form). Garshin introduces the reader to the biographies of the characters.

Studying the structure of the narrative, we note that the presentation. events in Garshin's prose can be concrete-stage, generalized-stage and informational. In a concrete stage narrative, the dismembered concrete actions of the subjects are reported (we have before us a kind of scenario). The dynamics of the narrative is transmitted through conjugated forms and the semantics of verbs, participles, adverbial formants. To express a sequence of actions, their relation to one subject of speech is preserved. In a generalized stage narrative, typical, repetitive actions in this one are reported. environment. The development of the action occurs with the help of auxiliary verbs, adverbial phrases. Generalized stage narration is not intended for staging. In the informational narrative, two varieties can be distinguished: the form of retelling and the form of indirect speech (themes of the message sound in the passages, there is no specifics, certainty of actions).

The following types of reasoning are presented in Garshin's prose works: nominal evaluative reasoning,. reasoning for the purpose of justifying actions, reasoning for the purpose of prescribing or describing actions, reasoning with the meaning of affirmation or negation. The first three varieties of reasoning are correlated with the scheme of the inferential sentence ("Batman and officer", "Nadezhda Nikolaevna", "Meeting"). For nominal evaluative reasoning, it is typical in the conclusion to evaluate the subject of speech; the predicate in the derivational sentence, represented by a noun, implements various semantic and evaluative characteristics (superiority, irony, etc.) - It is with the help of reasoning that the characteristic of the action is given for the purpose of justification (“Nadezhda Nikolaevna”). Reasoning with the aim of prescribing or describing substantiates the prescription of actions (if there are words with a prescriptive modality - with the meaning of necessity, obligation) ("Night"). Reasoning with the meaning of affirmation or negation is reasoning in the form of a rhetorical question or exclamation ("Coward").

Analyzing Garshin's prose, we determine the functions of "foreign word" and "point of view" in the author's works. Studies show that direct speech in the writer's texts can belong to both a living being (human) and inanimate objects (plants). In Garshin's prose works, the internal monologue is constructed as a character's appeal to himself. For the stories "Nadezhda Nikolaevna" and "Night", in which the narration is conducted in the first person, it is characteristic that the narrator reproduces his thoughts. In the works (“Meeting”, “Red Flower”, “Batman and Officer”), events are described in the third person, it is important that direct speech conveys the thoughts of the characters, i.e. the true view of the characters on a particular problem.

An analysis of examples of the use of indirect and improperly direct speech shows that these forms of someone else's speech in Garshin's prose are much less common than direct speech. It can be assumed that it is fundamental for a writer to convey the true thoughts and feelings of the characters (it is much more convenient to “retell” them using direct speech, thereby preserving the inner experiences and emotions of the characters).

Considering the concepts of narrator and narrator, it should be said about the story "The Incident", where we see two narrators and a narrator. In other works, the relationship is clearly presented: the narrator - "Four Days", "From the Memoirs of Private Ivanov", "A Very Short Novel" - a narration in the form of the first person, two narrators - "Artists", "Nadezhda Nikolaevna", the narrator - "Signal" , "The Traveling Frog", "Meeting", "Red Flower", "The Tale of the Proud Arree", "The Tale of the Toad and the Rose" - third-person narration. In the prose works of Garshin, the narrator is a participant in the ongoing events. In the story "A Very Short Romance" we see the conversation of the main character, the subject of speech, with the reader. The stories "Artists" and "Nadezhda Nikolaevna" are diaries of two storytelling characters. The narrators in the above works are not participants in the events and are not portrayed by any of the characters. A characteristic feature of the subjects of speech is the reproduction of the thoughts of the heroes, the description of their actions, deeds. We can talk about the relationship between the forms of depicting events and the subjects of speech in Garshin's stories. The revealed pattern of Garshin's creative manner boils down to the following: the narrator manifests himself in the forms of presentation of events from the first person, and the narrator - from the third.

Studying the "points of view" in Garshin's prose, we rely on the study of B.A. Uspensky "Poetics of composition". Analysis of the stories reveals the following points of view in the writer's works: in terms of ideology, spatio-temporal characteristics and psychology. The ideological plan" is clearly presented in the story "The Incident", in which three evaluative points of view meet: the view "of the heroine, the hero, the author-observer. We see the point of view in terms of the spatio-temporal characteristics in the stories" Meeting "and" Signal ": there is a spatial attachment of the author to the hero; the narrator is in close proximity to the character. The point of view in terms of psychology is presented in the story “Night.” Verbs of the internal state help to formally identify this type of description.

An important scientific result of the dissertation research is the conclusion that narration and psychologism in Garshin's poetics are in constant relationship. They form such a flexible artistic system that allows narrative forms to pass into the poetics of psychologism, and the forms of psychological analysis can also become the property of the narrative structure of Garshin's prose. All this refers to the most important structural regularity in the poetics of the writer.

Thus, the results of the dissertation research show that the basic categories in Garshin's psychologism poetics are confession, close-up, portrait, landscape, setting. According to our conclusions, in the poetics of the writer's narration, such forms as description, narration, reasoning, other people's speech (direct, indirect, improperly direct), points of view, categories of the narrator and narrator dominate.

List of references for dissertation research candidate of philological sciences Vasina, Svetlana Nikolaevna, 2011

1. Garshin V.M. Meeting. Works, selected letters, unfinished Text. / V.M. Garshin. - M.: Parade; 2007. 640 p.

2. Garshin V.M. Complete works in 3 volumes. Letters, vol. 3 Text. / V.M. Garshin. M.-L.: ACADEMIA, 1934. - 598 p.

3. Dostoevsky F.M. Collected works in 15 volumes. T.5 Text. / F.M. Dostoevsky. L.: Nauka, 1989. - 573 p.

4. Leskov N.S. Collected works in I volumes. T.4 Text. / N.S. Leskov. M.: State publishing house of fiction, 1957. - 515 p.

5. Nekrasov H.A. Collected works in 7 volumes. T. 3 Text. / H.A. Nekrasov. M.: Terra, 2010. - 381 p.

6. Tolstoy L.N. Collected works in 22 volumes. T.11 Text. / L.N. Tolstoy. -M.: Fiction, 1982. 503 p.

7. Turgenev I.S. Collected works in 12 volumes. T.1 Text. / I.S. Turgenev. M.: State publishing house of fiction, 1954. -480 p.

8. Chekhov A.P. Collected works in 15 volumes. Volume 7. Stories, stories (1887 1888) Text. / A.P. Chekhov. - M .: World of Books, 2007 -414 p.1 .. Theoretical and literary research

9. Atarova K.N., Lesskis G.A. Semantics and structure of first-person narration in fiction. Text. // Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Literature and Language Series. T. 35. No. 4. 1976. S. 344-356.

10. Yu.Atarova K.N., Lesskis G.A. Semantics and structure of third-person narration in fictional prose. Text. // Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Literature and Language Series. T. 39. No. 1. 1980. S. 33-46.

11. P.Auer A.P. The Compositional Function of the Psychological Situation in the Poetics of "The Refuge of Mon Repos" and "Modern Idyll" M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin Text. // Literary criticism and journalism: Interuniversity. Sat. scientific tr. Saratov: Sarat Publishing House. unta, 2000. - S.86-91.

12. Auer A.P. Development of psychological prose. Garshin Text. // History of Russian literature of the XIX century in 3 parts. Part 3 / Ed. IN AND. Korovin. M.: VLADOS, 2005. - S. 391-396.

13. Auer A.P. Russian literature of the HEK of the century. Tradition and Poetics Text. / A.P. Auer. - Kolomna: Kolomna State Pedagogical Institute, 2008. 208 p.

15. Bakhtin M.M. Questions of Literature and Aesthetics. Text. / MM. Bakhtin. M.: Fiction, 1975. - 502 p.

16. Bakhtin M.M. / Voloshinov V.N. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language Text. / MM. Bakhtin / V.N. Voloshinov // Anthropolinguistics: Selected Works (Psycholinguistics Series). M.: Labyrinth, 2010.-255s.

17. Bashkeeva V.V. From a picturesque portrait to a literary one. Russian poetry and prose of the late 18th - first third of the 19th centuries. / V.V. Bashkeev. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Publishing House, state. u-ta, 1999. - 260 p.

18. Belokurova S.P. Improper direct speech Text. / Dictionary of literary terms. St. Petersburg: Parity, 2006. - S. 99.

19. Belokurova S.P. Interior Text. / Dictionary of literary terms. St. Petersburg: Parity, 2006. - S. 60.

20. Belyaeva I.A. On the "psychological" function of space and time in the prose of I.A. Goncharova and I.S. Turgenev Text. // Russian Studies and Comparative Studies: Collection of Scientific Articles. Issue. III / Rev. Ed.: E.F. Kirov. M.: MGPU, 2008. - S. 116-130.

21. Bem A.JI. Psychoanalysis in literature (Instead of a preface) Text. / A.JI. Bem // Research. Letters about literature / Comp. S.G. Bocharova; Foreword and comment. S.G. Bocharova and I.Z. Surat. M.: Languages ​​of Slavic culture, 2001. - S. 245-264.

22. Borev Yu.B. Methodology for the analysis of a work of art. // Methodology for the analysis of a literary work / Otv. ed. Yu.B. Borev. M.: Nauka, 1998 - S. 3-33.

23. Borev Yu.B. Narration Text. / Aesthetics. Theory of Literature. Encyclopedic dictionary of terms. M.: Astrel, 2003. - S. 298.

24. Broitman S.N. Historical poetics Text. / S.N. Broitman. -M.-RGGU, 2001.-320 p.

25. Vakhovskaya A.M. Confession Text. // Literary encyclopedia of terms and concepts / Ed. A.N. Nikolyukin. M.: NPK "Intelvak", 2001. - p. 95.

26. Veselovsky A.N. Historical poetics Text. / A.N. Veselovsky. M.: Higher school, 1989. - 404 p.

27. Vinogradov V.V. On the theory of artistic speech Text. / V.V. Vinogradov. M.: Higher school, 1971. - 239 p.

28. Vinogradov V.V. On the language of fiction Text. / V.V. Vinogradov. M.: Goslitizdat, 1959. - 654 p.

29. Vygotsky L.S. Psychology of art Text. / L.S. Vygotsky. -M.: Art, 1968. 576 p.

30. Gay N.K. Pushkin's Prose: Narrative Poetics Text. / N.K. Gay. M.: Nauka, 1989. - 269 p.31. Ginzburg L.Ya. About psychological prose Text. / L.Ya. Ginzburg. - L.: Fiction, 1977. - 448 p.

31. Girshman M.M. Literary work: the theory of artistic integrity. Text. / MM. Girshman. M.: Languages ​​of Slavic culture, 2002. - 527 p.

32. Golovko V.M. Historical poetics of the Russian classical story. Text. / V.M. Golovko. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2010. - 280 p.

33. Gudonene V.V. Psychology of personality in Russian prose and poetry. / V.V. Gudonene. Vilnius: Vilnius Ped. un-t, 2006. -218s.

34. Gurovich N.M. Portrait Text. // Poetics: a dictionary of actual terms and concepts / [ch. scientific ed. N.D. Tamarchenko]. M.: Ygas1a, 2008.-S. 176.

35. Esin A.B. Psychologism of Russian classical literature. / A.B. Esin. - M.: Enlightenment, 1988. 176 p.

36. Genette J. Figures: In 2 vols. Vol. 2 Text. / J. Genette. M.: Publishing house im. Sabashnikov, 1998. - 469 p.

37. Zhirmunsky V.M. Introduction to Literary Studies: A Course of Lectures. Text. / Z.I. Plavskin, V.V. Zhirmunskaya. M.: Book house "LIBROKOM", 2009. - 464 p.

38. Ilyin I.P. Narrator Text. // Western literary criticism of the XX century: Encyclopedia / Ch. scientific ed. E.A. Tsurganov. M.: Intrada, 2004. - S. 274-275.

39. Ilyin I.P. Narratology Text. // Western literary criticism of the XX century: Encyclopedia / Ch. scientific ed. E.A. Tsurganov. M.: Intrada, 2004. - S. 280-282.

40. Culler J. Literary theory: a brief introduction Text. / J. Kaller: trans. from English. A. Georgieva. M.: Astrel: ACT, 2006. - 158 p.

41. Knigin I. A. Landscape Text. / I. A. Knigin // Dictionary of literary terms. Saratov: Lyceum, 2006. - 270 p.

42. Knigin I.A. Portrait Text. / I.A. Knigin // Dictionary of literary terms. Saratov: Lyceum, 2006. - 270 p.

44. Kozhevnikova H.A. Types of narration in Russian literature of the XIX-XX centuries. Text. / H.A. Kozhevnikov. M.: Institute of the Russian Language of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1994.-333 p.

45. Kozhin A.N. Functional types of Russian speech Text. / A.N. Kozhin, O.A. Krylova, V.V. Odintsov. -M.: Higher School, 1982. -223 p.

46. ​​Kompaneets V.V. Artistic psychologism as a research problem. Text. / Russian literature. No. 1. L .: Nauka, 1974. - S. 46-60.

47. Korman B.O. The study of the text of a work of art Text. / B.O. Korman. 4.1. M.: Enlightenment, 1972. - 111 p.

48. Korman B.O. Selected works. Theory of Literature Text. / Ed.-stat. E.A. Podshivalova, H.A. Remizova, D.I. Chereshnaya, V.I. Chulkov. Izhevsk: Institute for Computer Research, 2006. - 552 p.

49. Kormilov I.S. Landscape Text. // Literary encyclopedia of terms and concepts / Ed. A.N. Nikolyukin. M., 2001. S. 732-733.

50. Kormilov I.S. Portrait Text. // Literary encyclopedia of terms and concepts / Ed. A.N. Nikolyukin. M., 2001. S. 762.

51. Krinitsyn A.B. Confessions of an underground man. To the anthropology of F.M. Dostoevsky Text. / A.B. Krinitsyn. M.: MAKS Press, 2001.-370 p.

52. Levitsky L.A. Memoirs Text. // Literary Encyclopedic Dictionary / Ed. V.M. Kozhevnikova, P.A. Nikolaev. -M., 1987. S. 216-217.

53. Lie V. The peculiarity of psychologism in the stories of I.S. Turgenev "Asya", "First Love" and "Spring Waters" Text. / V. Lie. - M.: Dialog-MSU, 1997.-110 p.

54. Lobanova G.A. Landscape Text. // Poetics: a dictionary of current terms and concepts / Ch. scientific ed. N.D. Tamarchenko. - M.: Intrada, 2008.-p. 160.

55. Lotman Yu.M. Conversations about Russian culture. Life and traditions of the nobility (XVIII - early XIX century) Text. / Yu.M. Lotman. - St. Petersburg: Art-SPb, 2008. - 413 p.

56. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosphere. Culture and Explosion. Inside the thinking worlds. Articles, studies, notes Text. / Yu.M. Lotman. - SPb.: Art-SPb, 2004.-703 p.

57. Lotman Yu.M. The structure of the artistic text Text. // Yu.M. Lotman. About art. St. Petersburg: Art-SPb, 1998. - 285 p.

59. Mann Yu.V. On the evolution of narrative forms. Text. // Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Literature and Language Series. Volume 51, No. 1. M.: Nauka, 1992. - S. 40-59.

60. Melnikova I.M. Point of view as a boundary: its structure and functions Text. // On the way to the work. To the 60th anniversary of Nikolai Timofeevich Rymar: Sat. Art. Samara: Samara Humanitarian Academy, 2005. - S. 70-81.

61. Nechaeva O.A. Functional-semantic types of speech (narration, description, reasoning) Text. /O.A. Nechaev. - Ulan-Ude: Buryat book publishing house, 1974. - 258 p.

62. Nikolina H.A. Philological text analysis: Proc. allowance Text. / H.A. Nikolina. M.: Publishing Center "Academy", 2003.-256 p.

63. Paducheva E.V. Semantic studies (Semantics of time and aspect in the Russian language. Semantics of narrative) Text. / E.V. Paducheva. M .: School "Languages ​​of Russian Culture", 1996. - 464 p.

64. Sapogov V.A. Narration Text. / Literary Encyclopedic Dictionary / Under the general. ed. V.M. Kozhevnikova, P.A. Nikolaev. - M.: Soviet Encyclopedia, 1987 S. 280.

65. Svitelsky V.A. Personality in the World of Values ​​(Axiology of Russian Psychological Prose of the 1860s-1870s) Text. / V.A. Svitelsky. Voronezh: Voronezh State University, 2005. - 232 p.

66. Skaftymov A.P. Ideas and forms in the work of L. Tolstoy Text. / A.P. Skaftymov // Moral searches of Russian writers: Articles and researches about Russian classics. M.: Fiction, 1972.- S. 134-164.

67. Skaftymov A.P. On psychologism in the works of Stendhal and L. Tolstoy Text. // Moral searches of Russian writers: Articles and researches about Russian classics. M.: Fiction, 1972. - S. 165-181.

68. Skaftymov A.P. Thematic composition of the novel "The Idiot" Text. // Moral searches of Russian writers: Articles and researches about Russian classics. M.: Higher school, 2007. - S. 23-88.

69. Solganik G.Ya. Text style Text. / G.Ya. Solganik. -Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 1997. 252 p.

70. Strakhov I.V. Psychology of literary creativity (LN Tolstoy as a psychologist) Text. / I.V. Strakhov. Voronezh: Institute of Practical Psychology, 1998. - 379 p.

71. Tamarchenko N.D. Point of view Text. // Poetics: a dictionary of actual terms and concepts / [ch. scientific ed. N.D. Tamarchenko]. M.: Ъygas, 2008. - S. 266.

72. Tamarchenko N.D. Narration Text. //Poetics: a dictionary of actual terms and concepts / [ch. scientific ed. N.D. Tamarchenko]. -M.: Shgaya, 2008. S. 166-167.

73. Tamarchenko N.D. Narrator Text. // Poetics: a dictionary of actual terms and concepts / [ch. scientific ed. N.D. Tamarchenko]. -M.: Intrada, 2008. S. 167-169.

74. Tamarchenko N.D. Poetics Text. // Poetics: a dictionary of actual terms and concepts / [ch. scientific ed. N.D. Tamarchenko]. - M.: Intrada, 2008. S. 182-186.

75. Tamarchenko N.D. Narrator Text. // Poetics: a dictionary of actual terms and concepts / [ch. scientific ed. N.D. Tamarchenko]. -M.: Intrada, 2008. S. 202-203.

76. Tomashevsky B.V. Theory of Literature. Poetics Text. / B.V. Tomashevsky. M-JL: State Publishing House, 1930. - 240 p.

77. Tolmachev V.M. Point of view Text. / Western literary criticism of the XX century: Encyclopedia / Ch. scientific ed. E.A. Tsurganov. M.: Intrada, 2004. - S. 404-405.

78. Toporov V.N. The Thing in Anthropocentric Perspective (Plyushkin's Apology) Text. / V.N. Toporov // Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image: Studies in the field of mythopoetic: Selected works. M.: Progress-Culture, 1995. - S. 7-111.

79. Trubina E.G. Narratology: fundamentals, problems, prospects. Materials for the special course Text. / E.G. Trubin. Yekaterinburg: Publishing house Ural, un-ta, 2002. - 104 p.

80. Trufanova I.V. Pragmatics of improperly direct speech. Monograph Text. / I.V. Trufanov. M.: Prometheus, 2000. - 569 p.

81. Tynyanov Yu.N. Poetics. History of literature. Cinema Text. / Yu.N. Tynyanov. -M.: Nauka, 1977. 575 p.

82. Tyupa V.I. Analysis of literary text Text. / A.I. Tyup. - M.: Academia, 2006. 336 p.8 5. Tyupa V.I. Analytics of art (introduction to literary criticism) Text. / IN AND. Tyup. M: Labyrinth, Russian State University for the Humanities, 2001.-192 p.

83. Tyukhova E.V. About N.S. Leskova Text. / E.V. Tyukhov. -Saratov: Saratov University Press, 1993. 108 p.

84. Uvarov M.S. Architectonics of the confessional word. Text. / M.S. Uvarov. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya, 1998. - 243 p.

85. Uspensky B.A. Poetics of composition Text. / B.A. Uspensky. - St. Petersburg: Azbuka, 2000. 347 p.

86. Uspensky B.A. Semiotics of Art Text. / B.A. Uspensky. -M.: Languages ​​of Russian culture, 1995. 357 p.

87. Khalizev V.E. Theory of Literature Text. / V.E. Khalizev. M.: Higher school, 2002. - 436 p.

88. Khalizev V.E. Artistic plasticity in "War and Peace" L.N. Tolstoy Text. / V.E. Khalizev // Value Orientations of Russian Classics. -M.: Gnosis, 2005. 432 p.

89. Khmelnitskaya T.Yu. Into the depths of character: about psychologism in contemporary Soviet prose. / T.Yu. Khmelnitskaya. L .: Soviet writer, 1988. - 256 p.

90. Farino E. Introduction to literary criticism Text. / E. Farino. - St. Petersburg: Publishing house of the Russian State Pedagogical University im. I.A. Gertsen, 2004. 639 p.

91. Freidenberg O.M. Origin of narration Text. / O.M. Freidenberg // Myth and Literature of Antiquity. 2nd ed., rev. and additional M.: Publishing company "Eastern Literature" RAS, 1998. -S. 262-285.

92. Chudakov A.P. Narration Text. / Brief literary encyclopedia / Ch. ed. A. A. Surkov. T. 1-9. T.5. - M.: Soviet Encyclopedia, 1962-1978. - P.813.

93. Shklovsky V.B. On the theory of prose Text. / V.B. Shklovsky. - M: Soviet writer, 1983. - 384 p.

94. Schmid V. Narratology Text. / V. Schmid. - M.: Languages ​​of Slavic Culture, 2003. 311 p.

95. Shuvalov S. Life Text. // Literary encyclopedia: Dictionary of literary terms. T.1. A-P. M.; L .: Publishing house L. D. Frenkel, 1925. -Stb. 240-244.

96. Etkind E.G. "Inner man" and outer speech. Essays on the psychopoetics of Russian literature of the 18th and 19th centuries. Text. / E.G. Etkind. -M.: Languages ​​of Russian culture, 1999. - 446 p.

97. I. Literary-critical works about the work of V.M.1. Garshina

98. Aikhenvald Yu.I. Garshin Text. / Yu.I. Aikhenvald // Silhouettes of Russian writers: In 2 vols. T. 2. M .: Terra-kniga, 1998. -285 p.

99. Andreevsky S.A. Vsevolod Garshin Text. // Russian thought. Book VI. M., 1889. - S. 46-64.

100. Arseniev K.K. V. M. Garshin and his work Text. / V.M. Garshin // Complete Works. St. Petersburg: TV-in A.F. Marx, 1910. - S. 525-539.

101. Arkhangelsky V.N. The main image in the work of Garshin Text. // Literature and Marxism, Prince. 2, 1929. - S. 75-94.

102. Bazhenov H.H. Soul drama Garshin. (Psychological and psychopathic elements of his artistic work) Text. / H.H. Bazhenov. M.: Tipo-lit. t-va I.N. Kushnarev and Co., 1903.-24 p.

103. Bezrukov A.A. Gogol traditions in the work of V.M. Garshina Text. / A.A. Bezrukov. Armavir, 1988. - 18 p. - Dep. in INION AS USSR 28.04.88, No. 33694.

104. Bezrukov A.A. Ideological contradictions of V.M. Garshin and Tolstoyism Text. // Socio-philosophical concepts of Russian classical writers and the literary process. - Stavropol: Publishing house of SGPI, 1989. S. 146-156.

105. Bezrukov A.A. The critical beginning in the work of V.M. Garshina Text. / A.A. Bezrukov. Armavir, 1987. - 28 p. - Dep. in INION AN USSR 5.02.88, No. 32707.

106. Bezrukov A.A. Moral searches of V.M. Garshin and Turgenev's traditions. Text. / Armavir. State. Ped. in-t. - Armavir, 1988. 27 p. - Dep. in INION AN USSR 28.04.88, No. 33693.

107. Bekedin P.V. V.M. Garshin and Z.V. Vereshchagin Text. // Russian literature and fine arts of the 18th - early 20th centuries. - L .: Nauka, 1988. - S. 202-217.

108. Bekedin P.V. V.M. Garshin and fine arts Text. // Art, No. 2. M., 1987. - S. 64-68.

109. Bekedin P.V. Little-known pages of Garshin's creativity Text. // In memory of Grigory Abramovich Byaly: To the 90th anniversary of his birth. St. Petersburg: publishing house of St. Petersburg University, 1996. -S. 99-110.

110. Bekedin P.V. Nekrasovskoe in the work of V.M. Garshina Text. // Russian literature. No. 3. - St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1994. S. 105127.

111. Bekedin P.V. About one historical idea of ​​V.M. Garshina: (Unrealized novel about Peter I) Text. // Literature and history. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1997. - Issue. 2. - S. 170-216.

112. Bekedin P.V. Religious motives in V.M. Garshina Text. // Christianity and Russian literature. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1994. - S. 322363.

113. Belyaev N.Z. Garshin Text. / N.Z. Belyaev. M .: Publishing house VZHSM "Young Guard", 1938. - 180 p.

114. Berdnikov G.P. Chekhov and Garshin Text. / G.P. Berdnikov // Selected works: In two volumes. T.2. M.: Fiction, 1986. - S. 352-377.

115. Birshtein I.A. Dream V.M. Garshin. Psychoneurological study on the question of suicide. Text. / I.A. Birstein. M.: type. Moscow headquarters. military districts, 1913.-16 p.

116. Bogdanov I. Latkins. Close friends of Garshin Text. // New magazine. SPb., 1999. - No. 3. - S. 150-161.

117. Fighting G.N. Familiar and unfamiliar V. Garshin Text. // Philological notes. Issue. 20. Voronezh: Voronezh University, 2003. - S. 266-270.

118. Byaly G.A. Vsevolod Mikhailovich Garshin Text. / G.A. White. L .: Education, 1969. - 128 p.

119. Byaly G. A. V. M. Garshin and the literary struggle of the eighties Text. / G.A. White. - M.-L.: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1937.-210 p.

120. Vasilyeva I.E. The principle of "sincerity" as a means of argumentation in V.M. Garshina Text. / Rhetorical tradition and Russian literature // Ed. P.E. Bukharkin. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, 2003. - S. 236-248.

121. Geimbukh E.Yu. V.M. Garshin. "Poems in prose" Text. / Russian language at school. Feb. (No. 1). 2005. S. 63-68.

122. Genina I.G. Garshin and Hauptman. On the problem of interaction of national cultures. // Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century: An international symposium in three volumes. V.3. Oxford: Northgate, 2000. - pp. 53-54.

123. Henry P. Impressionism in Russian prose: (V.M. Garshin and A.P. Chekhov) Text. // Vestnik Mosk. university Series 9, Philology. -M., 1994.-№2. pp. 17-27.

124. Girshman M.M. Rhythmic composition of the story "The Red Flower" Text. // Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century: An international symposium in three volumes. V.l. - Oxford: Northgate, 2000. - C.171-179.

125. Golubeva O.D. The autographs have spoken. Text. // O.D. Golubev. Moscow: Book Chamber, 1991. - 286 p.

126. Gudkova S.P., Kiushkina E.V.M. Garshin master of psychological storytelling. Text. // Social and humanitarian research. Issue 2. - Saransk: Mordovian state. un-t, 2002. - S. 323-326.

127. Guskov H.A. Tragedy without history: The memory of a genre in prose

128. B.M. Garshina Text. // Culture of historical memory. - Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk state. un-t, 2002. S. 197-207.

129. Dubrovskaya I.G. About the last tale of Garshin Text. // World literature for children and about children. 4.1, no. 9. M.: MPGU, 2004.-S. 96-101.

130. Durylin S.N. Childhood V.M. Garshin: biographical sketch Text. / S.N. Durylin. M.: Tipo-lit. tv-va I.N. Kushnerev and Co., 1910. - 32 p.

131. Evnin F.I. F.M. Dostoevsky and V. Garshin Text. // Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Department of Literature and Language, 1962. No. 4. -1. C. 289-301.

132. Egorov B.F. Yu.N. Talker-Otrok and V.M. Garshin Text. // Russian Literature: Historical and Literary Journal. N1. SPb.: Nauka-SPb., 2007. -S.165-173.

133. Zhuravkina N.V. Personal world (the theme of death in the work of Garshin) Text. // Myth literature - myth restoration. - M. Ryazan: Pattern, 2000. - S. 110-114.

134. Zabolotsky P.A. In memory of the "knight of a sensitive conscience" V.M. Garshina Text. / P.A. Zabolotsky. Kyiv: type. I.D. Gorbunova, 1908.- 17 p.

135. Zakharov V.V. V.G. Korolenko and V.M. Garshin Text. // V.G. Korolenko and Russian Literature: Interuniversity. collection of scientific papers. Perm: PSPI, 1987. - S. 30-38.

136. Zemlyakovskaya A.A. Turgenev and Garshin Text. // The second interuniversity Turgenev collection / otv. ed. A.I. Gavrilov. -Eagle: [b.i.], 1968.-S. 128-137.

137. Ziman L.Ya. Andersen's beginning in the fairy tales of V.M. Garshina Text. // World literature for children and about children. 4.1, no. 9-M.: MPGU, 2004. S. 119-122.

138. Zubareva E.Yu. Foreign and domestic scientists about the work of V.M. Garshina Text. // Vestnik Mosk. university Ser. 9, Philology. M., 2002. - N 3. - S. 137-141.

139. Ivanov A.I. The military theme in the works of fiction writers of the 80s of the XIX century: (On the problem of method) Text. // Method, outlook and style in Russian literature of the 19th century: Interuniversity. collection of scientific papers / Ed. ed. A.F. Zakharkin. - M.: MGZPI, 1988.-S. 71-82.

140. Ivanov G.V. Four studies (Dostoevsky, Garshin, Chekhov) Text. // In memory of Grigory Abramovich Byaly: To the 90th anniversary of his birth. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, 1996. -S. 89-98.

141. Isupov K.G. "Petersburg Letters" by V. Garshin in the Dialogue of the Capitals Text. // World art culture in monuments. St. Petersburg: Education, 1997. - S. 139-148.

142. Kaidash-Lakshina S.N. The image of the "fallen woman" in the work of Garshin Text. // Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century: An international symposium in three volumes. V.l. - Oxford: Northgate, 2000. pp. 110-119.

143. Kalenichenko O.H. Genre traditions of F. Dostoevsky in "The Tale of the Proud Arree" by V. Garshin Text. // Philological search. Issue. 2. - Volgograd, 1996. - S. 19-26.

144. Kalenichenko O.N. Night of insight: (About the genre poetics of F. M. Dostoevsky's "The Meek" and V. M. Garshin's "Night") Text. //

145. Philological search. - Issue. No. 1. - Volgograd, 1993. p. 148157.

146. Kanunova F.Z. On some religious problems of Garshin's aesthetics (V.M. Garshin and I.N. Kramskoy) Text. // Russian literature in modern cultural space. 4.1 Tomsk: Tomsk state. Pedagogical University, 2003. - S. 117-122.

147. Kataev V.B. On the Courage of Fiction: Garshin and Gilyarovsky Text. // World of Philology. M., 2000. - S. 115-125.

148. Klevensky M.M. V.M. Garshin Text. / MM. Klevensky. -M-D., State publishing house, 1925. 95p.

149. Kozhukhovskaya N.V. Tolstoy's tradition in the military stories of V.M. Garshina Text. / From the history of Russian literature. -Cheboksary: ​​Cheboksary state. un-t, 1992. S. 26-47.

150. Kozhukhovskaya N.V. Images of space in the stories of V.M. Garshina Text. // Pushkin Readings. St. Petersburg: Leningrad State Educational Institution named after A.C. Pushkin, 2002. - S. 19-28.

151. Kolesnikova T. A. Unknown Garshin (On the problem of unfinished stories and unfulfilled plans of V.M.

152. Garshina) Text. // Individual and typological in the literary process. - Magnitogorsk: Magnitogorsk publishing house. state ped. in-ta, 1994. S. 112-120.

153. Kolmakov B.I. "Volga Messenger" about Vsevolod Garshin (1880s) Text. // Topical issues of philology. Kazan, 1994.-S. 86-90.- Dep. VINIONRAN 11/17/94, No. 49792.

154. Korolenko V.G. Vsevolod Mikhailovich Garshin. Literary portrait (February 2, 1855. March 24, 1888) Text. / V.G. Korolenko // Memories. Articles. Letters. - M.: Soviet Russia, 1988. - S. 217-247.

155. Box N.I. V.M. Garshin Text. // Education, 1905. No. 11-12.-S. 9-59.

156. Kostrshitsa V. Reality reflected in confession (On the question of V. Garshin's style) Text. // Questions of Literature, 1966. No. 12.-S. 135-144.

157. Koftan M. Traditions of A.P. Chekhov and V.M. Garshin in the tragedy of V.V. Erofeev “Walpurgis Night, or the Steps of the Commander” Text. // Young researchers of Chekhov. Issue. 4. - M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 2001.-S. 434-438.

158. Krasnov G.V. The finals of the stories by V.M. Garshina Text. // In memory of Grigory Abramovich Byaly: To the 90th anniversary of his birth. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, 1996. -S. 110-115.

159. Krivonos V.Sh., Sergeeva JI.M. "The Red Flower" by Garshin and the Romantic Tradition Text. // Traditions in the context of Russian culture. - Cherepovets: Publishing house of the Cherepovets state ped. in-ta im. A.B. Lunacharsky, 1995. - S. 106-108.

160. Kurganskaya A.L. The controversy about the work of V.M. Garshin in criticism of the 1880s. years: (To the 100th anniversary of death) Text. // Creative individuality of the writer and the interaction of literatures. Alma-Ata, 1988. - S. 48-52.

161. Lapunov C.B. The image of a soldier in a Russian military story of the 19th century (L.N. Tolstoy, V.M. Garshin - A.I. Kuprin) Text. // Culture and writing of the Slavic world. T.Z. - Smolensk: SGPU, 2004.-S. 82-87.

162. Lapushin P.E. Chekhov-Garshin-Przhevalsky (Autumn 1888) Text. // Chekhoviana: Chekhov and his entourage. M.: Nauka, 1996. -S. 164-169.

163. Latynina A.N. Vsevolod Garshin. Creativity and fate Text. / A.N. Latynin. M.: Fiction, 1986. - 223 p.

164. Lepekhova O.S. About some features of the narrative in the stories of V.M. Garshina Text. // Scientific notes Severodvin. Pomor, Mrs. un-ta im. M.V. Lomonosov. Issue 4. Arkhangelsk: Pomor University, 2004. - S. 165-169.

165. Lepekhova O.S., Loshakov A.G. The symbolism of numbers and the concept of "disease" in the works of V.M. Garshina Text. // Problems of literature of the XX century: in search of truth. Arkhangelsk: Pomor State University, 2003.-p. 71-78.

166. Lobanova G. A. Landscape Text. // Poetics: a dictionary of current terms and concepts / Ch. scientific ed. N.D. Tamarchenko. M.: Shgaya, 2008. - S. 160.

167. Loshakov A.G. Ideological-figurative and metatextual projections of the concept "illness" in the works of V.M. Garshina Text. // Problems of literature of the XX century: in search of truth. Arkhangelsk: Pomor State. un-t, 2003. - S. 46-71.

168. Luchnikov M.Yu. On the question of the evolution of canonical genres. Text. // Literary work and literary process in the aspect of historical poetics. Kemerovo: Kemerovo state. un-t, 1988.-p. 32-39.

169. Medyntseva G. “He had a face doomed to die” Text. // Lit. studies. No. 2. - M., 1990.- S. 168-174.

170. Miller O.F. In memory of V.M. Garshina Text. / V.M. Garshin // Complete Works. St. Petersburg: TV-in A.F. Marx, 1910. -S. 550-563.

171. Milyukov Yu.G. Poetics V.M. Garshina Text. / Yu.G. Milyukov, P. Henry, E. Yarwood. Chelyabinsk: ChTU, 1990. - 60 p.

172. Mikhailovsky N.K. More about Garshin and others Text. / N.K. Mikhailovsky // Articles on Russian literature of the 19th and 20th centuries. - L .: Fiction, 1989. - S. 283-288.

173. Mikhailovsky N.K. About Vsevolod Garshin Text. / N.K. Mikhailovsky // Articles on Russian literature of the 19th and 20th centuries. - L .: Fiction, 1989. - S. 259-282.

174. Moskovkina I. Unfinished drama V.M. Garshina Text. // In the world of Russian classics. Issue. 2. - M.: Fiction, 1987-S. 344-355.

175. Nevedomsky M.P. Initiators and Successors: Commemorations, Characteristics, Essays on Russian Literature from the Days of Belinsky to Our Days Text. / M.P. Nevedomsky. Petrograd: Kommunist publishing house, 1919.-410s.

176. Nikolaev O.P., Tikhomirova B.N. Epic Orthodoxy and Russian Culture: (On the Statement of the Problem) Text. // Christianity and Russian literature. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1994. - S. 549.

177. Nikolaeva E.V. The plot of the proud king in the processing of Garshin and Leo Tolstoy Text. // E.V. Nikolaev. M., 1992. - 24 p. - Dep. at INIONRAN 07/13/92, No. 46775.

178. Novikova A.A. People and war in the image of V.M. Garshina Text. // War in the fate and work of Russian writers. -Ussuriysk: Publishing house of UGPI, 2000. S. 137-145.

179. Novikova A.A. The story of V.M. Garshin "Artists": (On the problem of moral choice) Text. // Development of creative thinking of students. Ussuriysk: UGPI, 1996.- S. 135-149.

180. Novikova A.A. Knight of sensitive conscience: (From the memoirs of V. Garshin) Text. // Problems of Slavic culture and civilization: Materials of the region, scientific method, conf., May 13, 1999. Ussuriysk: USPI, 1999. - P. 66-69.

181. Ovcharova P.I. On the typology of literary memory: V.M. Garshin Text. // Artistic creativity and problems of perception. Kalinin: Kalinin State University. un-t, 1990. - S. 72-86.

182. Orlitsky Yu.B. Poems in prose by V.M. Garshina Text. // Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century: An international symposium in three volumes. V.3. Oxford: Northgate, 2000. - C. 3941.

183. Pautkin A.A. Military prose V.M. Garshina (traditions, images and reality) Text. // Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 9, Philology. No. 1. - M., 2005 - S. 94-103.

184. Popova-Bondarenko I.A. To the problem of the existential background. The story "Four days" Text. // Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century: An international symposium in three volumes. V.3. - Oxford: Northgate, 2000. P. 191-197.

185. Porudominsky V.I. Garshin. ZhZL Text. / IN AND. Porudominsky. - M .: Komsomol Publishing House "Young Guard", 1962. 304 p.

186. Porudominsky V.I. Sad soldier, or the life of Vsevolod Garshin Text. / IN AND. Porudominsky. M .: "Book", 1986. - 286 p.

187. Puzin N.P. Failed meeting: V.M. Garshin in Spassky-Lutovinovo Text. // Resurrection. No. 2. - Tula, 1995. -S. 126-129.

188. Rempel E.A. International collection "V.M. Garshin at the turn of the century": Review experience Text. // Philological studies. -Issue. 5. - Saratov: Publishing House of Saratov University, 2002. S. 87-90.

189. Rozanov S.S. Garshin-Hamlet Text. / S.S. Rozanov. - M.: t-in type. A.I. Mamontova, 1913. - 16 p.

190. Romanovskaya E.K. On the question of the sources of "The Tale of the Proud Arree" V.M. Garshin Text. // Russian literature. No. 1. - St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1997. S. 38-47.

191. Romanenkova N. The problem of death in the creative mind of Vsevolod Garshin Text. // Studia Slavica: a collection of scientific works of young philologists / Comp. Aurika Meimre. Tallinn, 1999.-p. 50-59.

192. Samosyuk G.F. The moral world of Vsevolod Garshin Text. // Literature at school. No. 5-6. -M., 1992 - S. 7-14.

193. Samosyuk G.F. Publications and studies of the letters of V.M. Garshin in the works of Yu.G. Oksman and K.P. Bogaevskaya Text. // Yulian Grigoryevich Oksman in Saratov, 1947-1958 / otv. ed. E.P. Nikitin. Saratov: GosUNTs "College", 1999. - S. 49-53.

194. Samosyuk G.F. Pushkin in the life and work of Garshin Text. // Philology. Issue. 5. Pushkin. - Saratov: Publishing house Saratov, un-ta, 2000. - S. 179-182.

195. Samosyuk G.F. Contemporaries about V.M. Garshine Text. / G.F. Samosyuk. Saratov: Sarat Publishing House. un-ta, 1977. - 256 p.

196. Sakharov V.I. The ill-fated successor. Turgenev and V.M. Garshin Text. / IN AND. Sakharov // Russian prose of the XVIII-XIX centuries. Problems of history and poetics. Essays. - M.: IMLI RAN, 2002. -S. 173-178.

197. Sventsitskaya E.M. The concept of personality and conscience in the work of Vs. Garshina Text. // Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century: An international symposium in three volumes. V. 1. - Oxford: Northgate, 2000. C. 186-190.

198. Skabichevsky A.M. Information about the life of Vsevolod Mikhailovich Garshin. / Vsevolod Garshin // Stories. -Pg.: Edition of the Literary Fund, 1919. pp. 1-28.

199. Starikova V.A. Details and paths in the ideological and figurative system of V.M. Garshin and A.P. Chekhov Text. // Ideological and aesthetic function of visual means in Russian literature of the 19th century. M.: Mosk. state ped. in-t im. V.I. Lenin, 1985.-S. 102-111.

200. Strakhov I.V. Psychology of literary creativity (LN Tolstoy as a psychologist) Text. / I.V. Strakhov. Voronezh: Institute of Practical Psychology, 1998. - 379 p.

201. Surzhko L.V. Linguistic and stylistic analysis of V.M. Garshin "Meeting": (Key words in the language and composition of a literary text) Text. // Russian language at school. No. 2 - M., 1986.-S. 61-66.

202. Surzhko L.V. On the semantic-stylistic aspect of the study of the components of a literary text: (Based on V. Garshin's story "Bears") Text. // Visn. Levin. University. Ser. Philol. -Vip. 18. 1987. - S. 98-101.

203. Sukhikh I. Vsevolod Garshin: portrait and around Text. // Questions of Literature. No. 7. - M., 1987 - S. 235-239.

204. Tikhomirov B.N. Garshin, Dostoevsky, Leo Tolstoy: On the question of the relationship between evangelical and folk Christianity in the works of writers. // Articles about Dostoevsky: 1971-2001. St. Petersburg: Silver Age, 2001. - S. 89-107.

205. Tuzkov S.A., Tuzkova I.V. Subjective-confessional paradigm: Vs. Garshin - V. Korolenko Text. / S.A. Tuzkov, I.V. Tuzkova // Neorealism. Genre-style searches in Russian literature of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. - M.: Flinta, Nauka, 2009.-332 p.

206. Chukovsky K. I. Vsevolod Garshin (Introduction to characterization) Text. / K.I. Chukovsky // Faces and masks. SPb.: Rosehip, 1914. - S. 276-307.

207. Shveder E.A. .Apostle of the world V.M. Garshin. Biographical sketch Text. / E.A. Shweder. M.: red. magazine "Young Russia", 1918. - 32 p.

208. Shmakov N. Types of Vsevolod Garshin. Critical study Text. / N. Shmakov. - Tver: Tipo-lit. F.S. Muravieva, 1884. 29 p.

209. Shuvalov S.V. Garshin-artist Text. / V.M. Garshin // [Collection].-M., 1931.-S. 105-125.

210. Ek E. V.M. Garshin (Life and work). Biographical sketch Text. / E. Ek. M .: "Star" N.N. Orfenova, 1918. - 48 p.

211. Yakubovich P.F. Hamlet of our days Text. / V.M. Garshin // Complete Works. - St. Petersburg: TV-in A.F. Marx, 1910. - S. 539-550.

212. Brodal J. Vsevolod Garshin. The Writer and his Reality Text. // Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century: An international symposium in three volumes. V.l. Oxford: Northgate, 2000. - P. 191197.

213. Dewhirst M. Three Translations of Garshin "s Story "Three Red Flowers" Text. // Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century: An international symposium in three volumes. V.2. - Oxford: Northgate, 2000.-P 230-235.

214. Kostrica V. The reception of Vsevolod Garshin in Czechoslovakia Text. // Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century: An international symposium in three volumes. V.2. Oxford: Northgate, 2000. - P. 158-167.

215. Weber H. Mithra and Saint George. Sources of "The Red Flower" Text. // Vsevolod Garshin at the turn of the century: An international symposium in three volumes. V.l. - Oxford: Northgate, 2000.-P. 157-171.

216. U1. Dissertation research

217. Barabash O.B. Psychologism as a constructive component of the poetics of the novel by JI.H. Tolstoy "Anna Karenina" Text.: Author. dis. . Ph.D. M., 2008. - 21 p.

218. Bezrukov A.A. Moral searches of V. M. Garshin. Origins and traditions Text.: Author. dis. . Ph.D. -M., 1989. 16 p.

219. Galimova E.Sh. Poetics of narration of Russian prose of the XX century (1917-1985) Text.: Dis. . doc. philol. Sciences. -Arkhangelsk, 2000. 362 p.

220. Eremina I.A. Reasoning as a transitional type of speech between monologue and dialogue: on the material of the English language Text.: Dis. Ph.D. - M., 2004. 151 p.

221. Zaitseva E.JI. The poetics of psychologism in the novels of A.F. Pisemsky Text.: Author. dis. . Ph.D. M., 2008. - 17 p.

222. Kapyrina T.A. Poetics of prose A.A. Feta: plot and narration Text.: Avtoref. dis. . Ph.D. Kolomna, 2006. -18 p.

223. Kolodiy L.G. Art as an artistic problem in Russian prose of the last third of the 19th century: (V.G. Korolenko, V.M. Garshin, G.I. Uspensky, L.N. Tolstoy) Text.: Abstract of the thesis. dis. . Ph.D. Kharkov, 1990. -17 p.

224. Moldavsky A.F. Narrator as a theoretical and literary category (on the material of Russian prose of the 20s of the XX century) Text.: Dis. . Ph.D. -M., 1996. 166 p.

225. Patrikeev S.I. Confession in the poetics of Russian prose of the first half of the 20th century (problems of genre evolution) Text.: Dis. . Ph.D. Kolomna, 1999.- 181 p.

226. Svitelsky V.A. The hero and his assessment in Russian psychological prose of the 60-70s of the 19th century. Text: Author's abstract. dis. . PhD Voronezh, 1995. - 34 p.

227. Skleinis G.A. Typology of characters in the novel by F.M. Dostoevsky "The Brothers Karamazov" and in the stories of V.M. Garshin 80s. Text: Author's abstract. dis. . Ph.D. -M., 1992. 17 p.

228. Starikova V.A. Garshin and Chekhov (The problem of artistic detail) Text .: Author. . Ph.D.-M., 1981. 17 p.

229. Surzhko JT.B. Stylistic dominant in a literary text: (An attempt to analyze the prose of V.M. Garshin) Text.: Abstract of the thesis. dis. . Candidate of Physical Sciences-M., 1987. 15 p.

230. Usacheva T.P. Artistic psychologism in the work of A.I. Kuprin: tradition and innovation Text.: Abstract of the thesis. . Ph.D. -Vologda, 1995.- 18 p.

231. Khrushcheva E.H. The poetics of narration in the novels of M.A. Bulgakov Text.: Dis. K.F.N-Ekaterinburg, 2004. 315 p.

232. Shubin V.I. Mastery of psychological analysis in the work of V.M. Garshina Text.: Author. dis. . Ph.D. M., 1980.-22 p.

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for review and obtained through original dissertation text recognition (OCR). In this connection, they may contain errors related to the imperfection of recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in the PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.



Similar articles