Oblomov Ilya Ilyich - the main character of the novel "Oblomov". Landowner, nobleman living in St. Petersburg. Leads a lazy life. Doesn't do anything, just dreams and "decomposes" lying on the couch. A bright representative of Oblomovism.
Stolz Andrei Ivanovich is a childhood friend of Oblomov. Half German, practical and active. The antipode of I. I. Oblomov.
Let's compare the heroes according to the following criteria:
Memories of childhood (including memories of parents).
I. I. Oblomov. From early childhood, everything was done for him: “The nanny is waiting for his awakening. She pulls on his stockings; he is not given, he is naughty, dangles his legs; the nanny catches him." “.. She washes him, combs his head and leads him to his mother. Since childhood, he also bathed in parental affection and care: “Mother showered him with passionate kisses ...” The nanny was everywhere, for days on end, like a shadow following him, constant guardianship did not end for a second: “... all the days and nights of the nanny were filled with turmoil, running around: either by trying, or by living joy for the child, or by fear that he will fall and hurt his nose ... ”.
Stolz. His childhood passes in a useful but tedious study: “From the age of eight he sat with his father behind a geographical map ... and with his mother he read sacred history, taught Krylov’s fables ...” His mother was constantly worried about her son: “... she would have kept him near her.” But his father was completely indifferent and cold-blooded to his son, and often "put his hand": "... and kicked him from behind so that he knocked him down."
Attitude towards study and work.
Oblomov. He went to school without much interest and desire, hardly sat in the classroom, to overcome any book for Oblomov was a great success and joy. “Why all these notebooks ... of paper, time and ink? Why study books? ... When to live? Instantly cold to one or another kind of activity, be it study, books, hobbies. The same attitude was to work: “... you study, you read that the time of disaster is about to come, an unhappy person; here you gather your strength, work, homogenize, endure terribly and work, everything is preparing clear days.
Stolz. He studied and worked from childhood - the main concern and task of his father. Teaching and books fascinated Stoltz throughout his life. Labor is the essence of human existence. "He served, retired, went about his business and actually made a home and money."
Attitude to mental activity.
Oblomov. Despite the lack of love for study and work, Oblomov was far from being a stupid person. Some thoughts, pictures were constantly spinning in his naked, he constantly made plans, but for completely incomprehensible reasons, all this was put off in a debt box. “When he gets out of bed in the morning, after tea he immediately lies on the sofa, props his head with his hand and thinks it over, sparing no effort, until, finally, his head gets tired ..”
Stolz. Realist to the core. A skeptic in life and in thought. “He was afraid of any dream, or, if he entered her area, then he entered, as they enter a grotto with an inscription ... knowing the hour or minute when you leave from there.”
Choice of life goals and ways to achieve them. (Including lifestyle.)
Oblomov. Life is monotonous, devoid of colors, every day is similar to the previous one. His problems and worries are breathtakingly funny and ridiculous, even funnier he solves them by turning from side to side. The author justifies Oblomov with all his might, saying that he has a lot of ideas and goals in his head, but none of them materialize.
Stolz. Skepticism and realism are everywhere. “He walked firmly, cheerfully; lived on a budget, trying to spend every day, like every ruble. “And he himself went stubbornly along the chosen path.”
So, we start working with text.
At one of the lessons, you were asked to make a quotation comparative description according to the plan, using only the material of the novel. The text of the novel.
Why is this needed?
Text analysis, deep text analysis! will allow you in this case to understand what makes up the image of the hero, how the choice of lexical means allows the Master (writer!) to create the character of the character. We will see that the choice of one or another will make it possible to convey to the reader a deep thought, idea (which idea - we will try to determine together)
You are on a wiki page, which means you can make changes. How to do it - see. Do not forget to indicate authorship - so it will be clear to me who to evaluate.
I filled in the first column for a sample - here is everything that we talked about in the lesson. If you have a desire to supplement the first column - please, this is encouraged.
Comparative characteristics of the image
Ilya Oblomov and Andrey Stolz
| Ilya Oblomov | Andrey Stoltz | |
| Portrait |
"It was a man of years thirty-two or three years old
medium height, "...Complexion
Ilya Ilyich had neither a ruddy, swarthy, nor positive "...body him, judging by the matte, too white |
"Stolz peer Oblomov: and he is already over thirty years old ... " "... He is all made up of bones, muscles and nerves
like blood English |
| Lifestyle, household items |
“The room where Ilya Ilyich lay seemed at first glance to be beautifully decorated. But the experienced eye of a person with pure taste<...>would only read the desire to somehow maintain the decorum of inevitable propriety just to get rid of them." “There was a forgotten towel on the sofa; on the table, a rare morning, there was not a plate with a salt shaker and a gnawed bone that had not been removed from yesterday’s dinner, and there were no bread crumbs lying around. owner lying on it, then you would think that no one lives here— so everything was dusty, faded and generally devoid of living traces of human presence." (Kipriyanova) Lying down with Ilya Ilyich was neither a necessity, like a sick person or like a person who wants to sleep, nor an accident, like someone who is tired, nor a pleasure, like a lazy person: this was his normal state." (Klimova) |
"Andrey often breaking away from business or from the secular crowd, from the evening, from the ball I was going to sit on Oblomov's wide sofa." (Kipriyanova) "He constantly on the move: the society needs to send an agent to Belgium or England - send him; you need to write some project or adapt a new idea to the case - choose it. Meanwhile he goes into the world and reads: when he has time - God knows." (Klimova) |
| outlook |
"Ah, if only Andrey would arrive sooner... He would have sorted everything out..." "Maybe Zakhar will try to settle everything in such a way that he won't have to move; maybe they'll manage..." "All the eternal running around, and gra trashy passions especially greed, gossip<...>Boredom, boredom, boredom! Where is the man? His integrity?<...>Light, society! You send me there for more reluctant to be there! What is there to look for? Interests, mind, heart? All these are dead, sleeping people!..." (A.Ustyantseva) |
"A simple, that is, direct, real outlook on life - that was his constant task<...>. "It is tricky and difficult to live simply!" "Labor is the image, content, element and purpose of life, at least mine." "He opened his umbrella while it was raining, that is, he suffered while the sorrow lasted, and he suffered without timid obedience but more with annoyance, with pride, and endured patiently only because attributed the cause of all suffering to himself, and did not hang, like a caftan, on someone else's nail. AND enjoyed, like a flower plucked along the way, until it withered in the hands ... " "He was afraid of any dream, or if he entered her area, then he entered, as one enters a grotto with the inscription: ma solitude, mon hermitage, mon repos, knowing the hour and minute when you leave from there." (Klimova) |
| Childhood, family background |
" Parents not in a hurry to explain to the child the meaning of life And prepare him for her, as to something tricky and serious; did not torment him over books that give rise to a multitude of questions in his head, but questions gnaw at the mind and heart and shorten life." “Everyone gasped and began to reproach each other for something that hadn’t occurred to me for a long time: to one - to remind, to another - to order to correct, to the third - to correct." "He was looking forward to this moment, with which began his independent life." (Kipriyanova) "Zakhar, as it used to be, a nanny, pulls on his stockings, puts on shoes, and Ilyusha, already fourteen year old the boy only knows that he is laying down one or the other leg while lying ... "(A. Ustyantseva) |
"They brought Andrei - but in what form: without boots, with a torn dress and a broken nose either to himself or to another boy." "Father put him with him on a spring cart, gave the reins and ordered him to be taken to the factory, then to the fields, then to the city, to merchants, to government places, then to look at some clay that he would take on his finger, sniff, sometimes lick, And he will give his son a sniff, and explain what she is, what she is good for. Otherwise, they will go to see how potash or tar is mined, lard is heated. "— Go where you came from he added, “and come again with the translation, instead of one or two chapters, and learn the role from the French comedy for your mother, which she asked: don't show up without it!" (Kipriyanova) "... Andryusha studied well, and father made him a tutor in my little boarding house.<…>he gave him a salary, as for a workman, quite in German: ten rubles a month, and forced to sign in the book." (A. Ustyantseva) |
| Attitude towards learning |
"Father and mother planted the spoiled Ilyusha for a book. It was worth tears, cries, whims." "And everyone in the house was imbued with the conviction that teaching and parental Saturday should not coincide in any way, or that the feast on Thursday is an insurmountable barrier to learning for the whole week. And for three weeks Ilyusha stays at home, and there, you see, it’s not far to Passion Week, and there is a holiday, and there someone in the family for some reason decides that they don’t study on Thomas’s week; there are two weeks left until the summer - it’s not worth going, and in the summer the German himself is resting, so it’s better to postpone until the fall. ”(Kipriyanova) "He generally considered all this to be a punishment sent down by heaven for our sins ..." (Klimova) |
" From the age of eight he sat with his father behind a geographical map, sorted out the warehouses of Herder, Wieland, biblical verses and summed up the illiterate accounts of peasants, burghers and factory workers, and with his mother read sacred history, taught Krylov's fables and disassembled Telemachus in warehouses. "(Kipriyanova) |
| Service attitude |
Ilya Ilyich would like the service to be something like an optional and easy occupation. Had this been the case, no doubt he would have been willing to go to work. But when confronted with reality, Ilya Ilyich realized that the service required significant forces, which he was not at all ready to spend on it. I wonder how Goncharov characterizes the views of Oblomov: “Life in his eyes was divided into two halves: one consisted of work and boredom - these were synonyms for him; the other - from peace and peaceful fun. From this, the main field - the service at first puzzled him in the most unpleasant way”. Oblomov is trying to free himself from service at any cost. He strives for rest and pleasure, not realizing that in fact rest is good and pleasant only after the work has been done. Ilya Ilyich is not ready to take responsibility for his actions. (Kvashenko M.) |
For Andrei Stoltz, work is not a way to achieve peace, any striving for which Stoltz called “Oblomovism”. Labor for him is “the image, content, element and purpose of life”.Stolz treated the service responsibly, was hardworking, never lazy, always completed the assigned tasks when performing the work.He worked not for the sake of a lofty goal, but for the sake of personal prosperity.(Kuzmin Zh.) |
| Attitude towards love |
"He never did not surrender to beauties, was never their slave, even very diligent admirer, already because a lot of trouble leads to rapprochement with women.<…>Rarely did fate confront him with a woman in society to such an extent that he could flare up for several days and consider himself in love ... "(A. Ustyantseva) |
"He not blinded by beauty and therefore did not forget did not humiliate the dignity of a man, was not a slave, "did not lie at the feet" of beauties, although did not experience fiery passions."(A.Ustyantseva) |
| ... | ||
| ... |
In I. A. Goncharov’s novel Oblomov, one of the main techniques for revealing images is the antithesis technique. With the help of opposition, the image of the Russian master Ilya Ilyich Oblomov and the image of the practical German Andrey Stolz are compared. Thus, Goncharov shows what are the similarities and what are the differences between these heroes of the novel.
Ilya Ilyich Oblomov- a typical representative of the Russian nobility of the XIX century. His social position can be briefly described as follows: “Oblomov, a nobleman by birth, collegiate secretary by rank, has been living in St. Petersburg for the twelfth year without a break.” By nature, Oblomov is a gentle and calm person, trying not to disturb his usual way of life. “His movements, when he was even alarmed, were also restrained by softness and laziness, not devoid of a kind of grace.” Oblomov spends whole days at home, lying on his sofa and thinking about the necessary transformations in his Oblomovka estate. At the same time, any definite idea was often absent from his face. “The thought walked like a free bird across the face, fluttered in the eyes, sat on half-open lips, hid in the folds of the forehead, then completely disappeared, and then an even light of carelessness glimmered all over the face.” Even at home, “he was lost in the tide of everyday worries and kept lying, tossing and turning from side to side.” Oblomov eschews secular society and generally tries not to go out into the street. His serene state is violated only by visitors who come to Oblomov only for selfish purposes. Tarantiev, for example, simply robs Oblomov, constantly borrowing money from him and not returning it. Oblomov turns out to be a victim of his visitors, not understanding the real purpose of their visits. Oblomov is so remote from real life that light for him is an eternal vanity without any purpose. “No sincere laughter, no glimmer of sympathy… what kind of life is this?” - Oblomov exclaims, considering communication with secular society an empty pastime. But suddenly the calm and measured life of Ilya Ilyich is interrupted. What happened? His friend of youth, Stolz, arrives, with whom Oblomov pins hopes for improving his situation.
“Stolz is the same age as Oblomov: and he is already over thirty years old. He served, retired, went about his business and actually made a house and money.” The son of a burgher, Stolz can be considered an antipode to the idle Russian gentleman of the 19th century, Oblomov. From early childhood, he was brought up in harsh conditions, gradually getting used to the difficulties and hardships of life. His father is German, his mother is Russian, but Stolz inherited practically nothing from her. His father was completely involved in his upbringing, so the son grew up just as practical and purposeful. “He is all made up of bones, muscles and nerves, like a blooded English horse.” Unlike Oblomov, Stolz "was afraid of any dream", "the mysterious, the mysterious had no place in his soul." If Oblomov's normal state can be called lying down, then Stolz's is movement. Stolz's main task was "a simple, that is, a direct, real view of life." But what then connects Oblomov and Stolz? Childhood and school - that's what connected people so different in character and in their views for the rest of their lives. However, in his youth, Oblomov was just as active and passionate about knowledge as Stolz. They spent long hours together reading books and studying various sciences. But upbringing and gentle character still played a role, and Oblomov soon moves away from Stolz. Subsequently, Stolz tries to bring his friend back to life, but his attempts are futile: Oblomovism has swallowed up Oblomov.
Thus, the reception of antithesis is one of the main techniques in the novel by I. A. Goncharov “Oblomov”. With the help of antithesis, Goncharov compares not only the images of Oblomov and Stolz, he also compares the objects surrounding them and reality. Using the technique of antithesis, Goncharov continues the tradition of many Russian writers. For example, N. A. Ostrovsky in his work “Thunderstorm” contrasts Kabanikh and Katerina. If for Kabanikhi “Domostroy” serves as the ideal of life, then for Katerina, love, honesty and mutual understanding are above all. A, S. Griboyedov in the immortal work “Woe from Wit”, using the antithesis technique, compares Chatsky and Famusov.
- In the novel "Oblomov" the skill of Goncharov the prose writer manifested itself with full force. Gorky, who called Goncharov "one of the giants of Russian literature", noted his special, plastic language. Goncharov's poetic language, his talent for imaginative reproduction of life, the art of creating typical characters, compositional completeness and the enormous artistic power of the picture of Oblomovism presented in the novel and the image of Ilya Ilyich - all this contributed to the fact that the novel "Oblomov" took its rightful place among the masterpieces […]
- There is a type of book where the reader is carried away by the story not from the first pages, but gradually. I think Oblomov is just such a book. Reading the first part of the novel, I was inexpressibly bored and did not even imagine that this laziness of Oblomov would lead him to some kind of sublime feeling. Gradually, boredom began to leave, and the novel captured me, I read it with interest. I have always liked books about love, but Goncharov gave it an interpretation unknown to me. It seemed to me that boredom, monotony, laziness, […]
- The remarkable Russian prose writer of the second half of the 19th century, Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov, in his novel Oblomov, reflected the difficult time of transition from one era of Russian life to another. Feudal relations, the estate type of economy were replaced by a bourgeois way of life. The centuries-old views of people on life collapsed. The fate of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov can be called an "ordinary story", typical of landowners who lived serenely at the expense of the labor of serfs. The environment and upbringing made them weak-willed, apathetic people, […]
- Despite the significant volume of the work, there are relatively few characters in the novel. This allows Goncharov to give detailed characteristics of each of them, to draw up detailed psychological portraits. The female characters in the novel were no exception. In addition to psychologism, the author widely uses the method of oppositions and the system of antipodes. Such couples can be called "Oblomov and Stolz" and "Olga Ilyinskaya and Agafya Matveevna Pshenitsyna." The last two images are complete opposites of each other, […]
- Andrei Stolz is Oblomov's closest friend, they grew up together and carried their friendship through life. It remains a mystery how such dissimilar people with such different outlooks on life could maintain a deep attachment. Initially, the image of Stolz was conceived as the complete antipode of Oblomov. The author wanted to combine German prudence and the breadth of the Russian soul, but this plan was not destined to come true. As the novel developed, Goncharov became more and more clearly aware that in the given conditions such a […]
- Introduction. Some people find Goncharov's novel Oblomov boring. Yes, indeed, the entire first part of Oblomov lies on the couch, receiving guests, but here we get to know the hero. In general, there are few intriguing actions and events in the novel that are so interesting to the reader. But Oblomov is “our people's type”, and it is he who is a bright representative of the Russian people. Therefore, the novel interested me. In the main character, I saw a particle of myself. Do not think that Oblomov is a representative of only Goncharov's time. And now live […]
- Olga Sergeevna Ilyinskaya Agafya Matveevna Pshenitsyna Character traits Captivating, delightful, promising, good-natured, cordial and unfeigned, special, innocent, proud. Good-natured, open, trusting, sweet and restrained, caring, thrifty, neat, independent, constant, stands her ground. Appearance Tall, bright face, delicate thin neck, gray-blue eyes, fluffy eyebrows, long braid, small compressed lips. gray-eyed; nice face; well-fed; […]
- The image of Oblomov in Russian literature closes a number of "superfluous" people. An inactive contemplative, incapable of active action, at first glance really seems incapable of a great and bright feeling, but is it really so? In the life of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov there is no place for global and cardinal changes. Olga Ilyinskaya, an extraordinary and beautiful woman, a strong and strong-willed nature, undoubtedly attracts the attention of men. For Ilya Ilyich, an indecisive and timid person, Olga becomes the object of […]
- The novel by I.A. Goncharov is full of different opposites. The reception of antithesis, on which the novel is built, helps to better understand the character of the characters, the author's intention. Oblomov and Stolz are two completely different personalities, but, as they say, opposites converge. They are connected by childhood and school, which can be found in the chapter “Oblomov's Dream”. From it it becomes clear that everyone loved little Ilya, caressed, did not allow him to do anything himself, although at first he was eager to do everything himself, but then he […]
- Oblomov's personality is far from ordinary, although other characters treat him with slight disrespect. For some reason, they read it almost flawed compared to them. This was precisely the task of Olga Ilyinskaya - to wake up Oblomov, to force him to prove himself as an active person. The girl believed that love would move him to great accomplishments. But she was deeply mistaken. It is impossible to awaken in a person what he does not have. Because of this misunderstanding, people's hearts were broken, heroes suffered, and […]
- Oblomov Stolz comes from a wealthy noble family with patriarchal traditions. his parents, like grandfathers, did nothing: serfs from a poor family worked for them: his father (a Russified German) was the manager of a rich estate, his mother was an impoverished Russian noblewoman. pour water for himself) labor in the block was a punishment, it was believed that it was stigmatized with slavery. there was a cult of food in the family, and […]
- By the middle of the XIX century. under the influence of the realistic school of Pushkin and Gogol, a new remarkable generation of Russian writers grew up and formed. Already in the 1940s, the brilliant critic Belinsky noted the emergence of a whole group of talented young authors: Turgenev, Ostrovsky, Nekrasov, Herzen, Dostoevsky, Grigorovich, Ogaryov, and others. Among these promising writers was Goncharov, the future author of Oblomov, the first novel which "Ordinary History" was highly appreciated by Belinsky. LIFE AND CREATIVITY I. […]
- Created eight centuries ago by the genius of the Russian people, The Lay retains the significance of an unfading model for the present, for the future - both with its powerful patriotic sound, and the inexhaustible richness of content, and the unique poetry of all its elements. For Ancient Rus', a dynamic style is very characteristic. He finds himself in architecture, painting and literature. This is a style within which everything that is most significant and beautiful appears majestic. Chroniclers, authors of lives, church words […]
- The literary fate of Fet is not quite usual. His poems, written in the 40s. XIX century., were met very favorably; they were reprinted in anthologies, some of them were set to music and made the name Fet very popular. And indeed, lyrical poems, imbued with spontaneity, liveliness, sincerity, could not fail to attract attention. In the early 50s. Fet was published in Sovremennik. His poems were highly appreciated by the editor of the magazine Nekrasov. He wrote about Fet: “Something strong and fresh, pure […]
- Sonya Marmeladova for Dostoevsky is the same as Tatyana Larina for Pushkin. We see the author's love for his heroine everywhere. We see how he admires her, speaks of God, and somewhere even protects her from misfortunes, no matter how strange it sounds. Sonya is a symbol, a divine ideal, a sacrifice in the name of saving humanity. She is like a guiding thread, like a moral model, despite her occupation. Sonya Marmeladova is Raskolnikov's antagonist. And if we divide the heroes into positive and negative, then Raskolnikov will […]
- This is not an easy question. Painful and long is the path that must be passed in order to find the answer to it. And can you find it? Sometimes it seems that this is impossible. Truth is not only a good thing, but also a stubborn thing. The further you go in search of an answer, the more questions arise in front of you. And it's not too late, but who will turn halfway? And there is still time, but who knows, maybe the answer is two steps away from you? Truth is tempting and many-sided, but its essence is always the same. Sometimes it seems to a person that he has already found the answer, but it turns out that this is a mirage. […]
- The theme of Petersburg was set in Russian literature by Pushkin. It is in his "The Bronze Horseman", in "The Queen of Spades" that we encounter a two-faced city: the beautiful, mighty St. Petersburg, the creation of Peter, and the city of poor Eugene, a city whose very existence turns into a tragedy for a small person. In the same way, Gogol's Petersburg is two-faced: a brilliant fantastic city is sometimes hostile to a person whose fate can be broken on the streets of the northern capital. Sad Petersburg Nekrasov - Petersburg front […]
- Among the best students, I had the opportunity to go to Moscow. The next day after our arrival, we were taken on an excursion to the State Tretyakov Gallery. I entered a huge hall. I was surrounded by a "society" of paintings. I slowly walked around the hall, carefully examining each work of great, famous artists, and suddenly stopped for some reason near the most, in my opinion, an ordinary picture. It depicted a landscape of a Russian village. Looking at it carefully, I finally found the creator of this […]
- In general, the history of the creation and the idea of the play “Thunderstorm” are very interesting. For some time there was an assumption that this work was based on real events that took place in the Russian city of Kostroma in 1859. “In the early morning of November 10, 1859, the Kostroma bourgeois Alexandra Pavlovna Klykova disappeared from the house and either threw herself into the Volga, or was strangled and thrown there. The investigation revealed a dull drama that played out in an unsociable family living with narrowly trading interests: […]
- Nekrasov's poem "Who Lives Well in Rus'" occupies a special place both in the history of Russian classical literature and in the creative heritage of the poet. It is a synthesis of Nekrasov's poetic activity, the completion of many years of creative work of the revolutionary poet. Everything that Nekrasov developed in separate works over the course of thirty years is collected here in a single plan, grandiose in content, scope and courage. It merged all the main lines of his poetic searches, most fully […]
Oblomov Ilya Ilyich - the main character of the novel "Oblomov". Landowner, nobleman living in St. Petersburg. Leads a lazy life. Doesn't do anything, just dreams and "decomposes" lying on the couch. A bright representative of Oblomovism.
Stolz Andrei Ivanovich is a childhood friend of Oblomov. Half German, practical and active. The antipode of I. I. Oblomov.
Let's compare the heroes according to the following criteria:
Memories of childhood (including memories of parents).
I. I. Oblomov. From early childhood, everything was done for him: “The nanny is waiting for his awakening. She pulls on his stockings; he is not given, he is naughty, dangles his legs; the nanny catches him." “.. She washes him, combs his head and leads him to his mother. Since childhood, he also bathed in parental affection and care: “Mother showered him with passionate kisses ...” The nanny was everywhere, for days on end, like a shadow following him, constant guardianship did not end for a second: “... all the days and nights of the nanny were filled with turmoil, running around: either by trying, or by living joy for the child, or by fear that he will fall and hurt his nose ... ”.
Stolz. His childhood passes in a useful but tedious study: “From the age of eight he sat with his father behind a geographical map ... and with his mother he read sacred history, taught Krylov’s fables ...” His mother was constantly worried about her son: “... she would have kept him near her.” But his father was completely indifferent and cold-blooded to his son, and often "put his hand": "... and kicked him from behind so that he knocked him down."
Attitude towards study and work.
Oblomov. He went to school without much interest and desire, hardly sat in the classroom, to overcome any book for Oblomov was a great success and joy. “Why all these notebooks ... of paper, time and ink? Why study books? ... When to live? Instantly cold to one or another kind of activity, be it study, books, hobbies. The same attitude was to work: “... you study, you read that the time of disaster is about to come, an unhappy person; here you gather your strength, work, homogenize, endure terribly and work, everything is preparing clear days.
Stolz. He studied and worked from childhood - the main concern and task of his father. Teaching and books fascinated Stoltz throughout his life. Labor is the essence of human existence. "He served, retired, went about his business and actually made a home and money."
Attitude to mental activity.
Oblomov. Despite the lack of love for study and work, Oblomov was far from being a stupid person. Some thoughts, pictures were constantly spinning in his naked, he constantly made plans, but for completely incomprehensible reasons, all this was put off in a debt box. “When he gets out of bed in the morning, after tea he immediately lies on the sofa, props his head with his hand and thinks it over, sparing no effort, until, finally, his head gets tired ..”
Stolz. Realist to the core. A skeptic in life and in thought. “He was afraid of any dream, or, if he entered her area, then he entered, as they enter a grotto with an inscription ... knowing the hour or minute when you leave from there.”
Choice of life goals and ways to achieve them. (Including lifestyle.)
Oblomov. Life is monotonous, devoid of colors, every day is similar to the previous one. His problems and worries are breathtakingly funny and ridiculous, even funnier he solves them by turning from side to side. The author justifies Oblomov with all his might, saying that he has a lot of ideas and goals in his head, but none of them materialize.
Stolz. Skepticism and realism are everywhere. “He walked firmly, cheerfully; lived on a budget, trying to spend every day, like every ruble. “And he himself went stubbornly along the chosen path.”
Love in Goncharov's novel "Oblomov" (relations between Oblomov and Olga, Oblomov and Pshenitsyna, Stolz and Olga).
The novel by I. A. Goncharov “Oblomov” shows three love stories: Oblomov and Olga, Oblomov and Agafya Matveevna, Olga and Stolz. They all have a different attitude to love, they have different goals in life, different views on life itself, but they have something in common - the ability to love. They are looking for their love for a long time and, only having found it, they find true happiness.
Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is a typical Russian gentleman. He grew up as a bobak and therefore he doesn’t know how and doesn’t want to do anything, he just lies on the couch all day long, eats, sleeps and makes grandiose plans for the future. Even Stoltz, his closest friend, cannot bring him out of a state of complete inactivity. But the situation changes dramatically after Oblomov's acquaintance with Olga Ilyinskaya. She was considered an unusual girl, there was “no affectation, no lies, no coquetry” in her. It was for this sincerity, purity, directness that he fell in love with Olga. The heroine first tries to awaken him to life, and then fell in love with him for his kindness, gentleness, and romance.
In the summer, Oblomov follows Olga to the dacha, where their love blooms in full force. But already here he understands that he and Olga are different people, that she does not love him, but only the future Oblomov.
Returning to St. Petersburg, they continue to meet, although Oblomov again leads a sedentary lifestyle. He begins to imagine how many things need to be done for the wedding - to settle things in Oblomovka, to find a new apartment, to prepare everything for the wedding, to visit old friends and invite them to visit. The hero is afraid of these troubles and therefore begins to move away from Olga, excused either by illness or by the poor condition of the roads. She begins to realize that Ilya Ilyich is far from the person she painted in her imagination, and that she cannot make the real Oblomov perfect. Therefore, Olga breaks with Oblomov.
Their break should have been a relief for Oblomov, but it brings him heartache. He loved sincerely, the end of the relationship killed the remnants of the energetic, active Oblomov.
The hero again plunges into the pool of idleness and daydreaming. All worries about him are taken over by his landlady, Agafya Matveevna Pshenitsyna. She herself does not know why she loves Ilya Ilyich. Perhaps he differs sharply from her surroundings, from servile officials like her late husband, perhaps she discerned his gentleness, sensitivity, kindness. She sacrifices a lot for him, sells her things so that he always feels good. The hero likes her constant movement, her unobtrusive concern for him, her willingness to give everything for a loved one. Oblomov begins to get used to it. He marries Agafya Matveevna, their son Andrey is born.
Until the death of Ilya Ilyich, she takes care of him, takes him for walks, cares and cherishes him. After his death, she is the only one who does not forget him, takes care of his grave. She gives their son Andrey to Stolz and Olga, so that the son is brought up in the same environment as his father, so that he becomes a real nobleman.
Oblomov found in the widow Pshenitsyna a woman from his dreams, who lived only for the sake of her husband and children. She brightened up his last days, helped him live them calmly, without needing anything.
After the break with Oblomov, Olga cannot recover for a long time. Together with her aunt, she leaves for a trip to Europe, where she meets with Stolz. Andrei was very surprised to see instead of the cheerful girl that Olga was before leaving, a serious young woman. He understands that the “new” Olga is the ideal he aspired to. Stolz confesses his love to her. Olga, on the other hand, is afraid of the feeling for Stolz that is emerging in her, she believes that you can love only once and that now she cannot truly love anyone. Stolz explains to her that she did not love Oblomov, it was only a preparation for love, and Olga will still be happy.
The joint life of Stolz and Olga is similar to the dreams of Ilya Ilyich: their own house in the Crimea, children, every evening they read books, newspapers, discuss new inventions and discoveries, argue on various topics. But Olga feels some kind of dissatisfaction, some kind of unconscious striving forward. These aspirations help her to look at life “with more love”.
In his novel, Goncharov showed different faces of love: Agafya Matveevna's sacrificial love, Olga's idealized love for Oblomov, the union of two loving people - Olga and Stolz. Each of them is beautiful in its own way, each of them is possible only for a certain type of people. Olga, Stolz, Oblomov, Pshenitsyn's widow are completely different people, but they have a common goal - to be with a loved one, to have a family. Love is a great feeling, there are no class barriers for it (Oblomov and Agafya Matveevna). If you really love, you will do everything for your loved one.
Oblomov and Stoltz. COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS (BY GONCHAROV'S NOVEL "OBLOMOV")
1.Introduction.
Ways to characterize characters.
2. The main part.
2.1 Oblomov and Stolz: “poet of dreams” and “poet of labor”.
2.2 The appearance of the heroes.
2.3 Upbringing and education of heroes.
2.4 Heroes and Olga Ilyinskaya.
2.5 The further fate of the heroes.
3. Conclusion.
Hope for the future.
I. A. Goncharov
Writers resort to various methods of characterizing heroes in order to more fully and multifacetedly portray their character and inner world. This may be a detailed description of the circumstances of the upbringing and education of the character that shaped his personality. The protagonist's dream is a popular device for describing the internal state of a character, repeatedly used by many Russian classics. Another way to characterize a literary hero is to take the antithesis (opposition) of two completely different characters in the work. Such are the antagonists Onegin and Lensky from the novel in verse by A. s. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin", Evgeny Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov by I. S. Turgenev in the novel "Fathers and Sons", Prince Myshkin and Parfyon Rogozhin from the novel by F. M. Dostoevsky "The Idiot". It is the dissimilarity that characterizes the heroes most vividly and deeply. The heroes of the novel by Ivan Alexandrovich Goncharov "Oblomov" are completely different from each other. And the external difference only emphasizes their antagonism. Ilya Ilyich Oblomov, the protagonist of the work, is pampered and imposing. His skin is white, his body is plump, his hands are effortless, plump and soft. This is a real Russian master, slow and unhurried. His favorite clothes are a dressing gown, cozy and roomy, perfectly suited to Oblomov. Andrey Stolz, a friend of the protagonist, fit and slender. It's like it's all made up of muscles in constant motion. His skin was tanned from constant exposure to the open air. So unlike in appearance, the characters are close friends. They lived next door as children and grew up together. Oblomov's estate is an example of a classic Russian estate, a piece of paradise, located far from major roads, cities, events, life itself. Life in Oblomovka proceeds measuredly and obeys its own rules: eating is a kind of ritual, and any work is a punishment. Little Ilya Ilyich was always surrounded by loving parents, numerous relatives, guests, nannies who followed his every step. Ilya, like any child, was curious and observant. However, constant control and excessive guardianship by adults have blunted these traits. Stolz was brought up in different conditions. Parents paid much attention to his education. And if the mother studied music and literature with her son, then the father was worried about the practical side of life. Stolz was sent alone on business, and when he disappeared, the father did not go to look for his son, hoping for his independence. Stolz was taught from childhood to work, diligence, independence. And he grew up to be a stubborn, ambitious, smart, businesslike person who achieved a lot in life. And yet, little Stolz was irresistibly attracted to the sleepy Oblomovna. Perhaps that harmony and love, the atmosphere of peace and comfort in which Ilya Ilyich grew up, was not enough for his friend in his parental home. Stolz was always drawn to the lazy and serene Oblomov. Warmth, tenderness, nobility, sincerity were valued by Stoltz above the business acumen and perseverance of other people. Stolz loses somewhat in comparison with Oblomov. His efficiency is abstract. The reader does not see the fruits of his activity. He does not dispose to himself at first sight, like Oblomov. But the characters certainly complement each other.
The meeting with Olga Ilyinskaya revealed the characters of both friends from a new side, and, first of all, the personality of Oblomov. He turned out, unlike Stolz, capable of strong sincere love, which also changed the main character. Olga, direct and natural, after meeting with Ilya Ilyich, turned from a naive girl into a beautiful young woman, subtly and deeply feeling. She was enriched internally and acquired a huge life experience that raised her even above the developed Stolz. Olga immediately saw and appreciated the spiritual beauty of Ilya Ilyich, but even she was unable to defeat Oblomovism. Stolz already fell in love with the “new” Olga, who changed thanks to Oblomov, who experienced a lot, suffered, fought, but lost.
After that, the fate of the heroes diverged. Oblomov found happiness in his understanding - he found Oblomovna in the house of Agafya Matveevna Pshenitsyna. He sank, flabby, and already very vaguely resembled the former charming gentleman. Stolz started a family with Olga Ilinskaya. They seem to be happy, only sometimes an incomprehensible sadness and longing finds on Olga, memories of Ilya Ilyich visit. The son of Oblomov and Andrei becomes a kind of focus of the best qualities of both heroes. The heir of Oblomov and the pupil of Stolz in the future, perhaps, will become in all respects a wonderful person, active and active, but with a gentle poetic soul and a heart of gold.
