- The coincidence in time of the substitution of Tsar Peter I (August 1698) and the appearance of a prisoner in the Iron Mask in the Bastille in Paris (September 1698). In the lists of prisoners of the Bastille, he was listed under the name Magchiel, which may be a distorted record of Mikhailov, the name under which Tsar Peter traveled abroad. His appearance coincided with the appointment of a new commandant of the Bastille Saint-Mars. He was tall, carried himself with dignity, and always wore a velvet mask on his face. The prisoner was respectfully treated and kept well. He died in 1703. After his death, the room where he was kept was carefully searched, and all traces of his stay were destroyed.
- The Orthodox Tsar, who preferred traditional Russian clothes, left for the Great Embassy. There are two portraits of the king made during the journey, in which he was depicted in a Russian caftan, and even during his stay and work at the shipyard. A Latin man returned from the embassy, wearing only European clothes and never again wearing not only his old Russian clothes, but even royal attire. There is reason to believe that Tsar Peter I and the “imposter” differed in body structure: Tsar Peter was shorter and denser than the “imposter”, the size of the boots was different, while the “imposter”, with a height of more than 2 meters, had a clothing size that corresponded to the modern size 44 !!! The wax painted statue of K. Rastrelli and the freak of M. Shemyakin are not the fruit of the creative imagination of the sculptors, but the true appearance of "Peter the Great" and his "reforms".
- In the portraits of Peter I (Godfried Kneller), made during the Great Embassy, Peter's hair is curly, short, in a bracket, not on the shoulders, as "Peter the Great" later wore, a mustache that is slightly breaking through, a wart on the right side of the nose. With a wart, it is generally not clear, since it is not on the lifetime portraits of "Peter the Great", so it is important to find out when it was and when it was not. The age of "Peter the Great", which is confirmed by lifetime portraits dating back to 1698-1700, is at least 10 years older than Tsar Peter!!!
- The impostor did not know the location of the library of Tsar Ivan the Terrible, although this secret was passed on to all the kings, and even Tsar Peter's sister Tsarevna Sophia knew and visited this place. It is known that "Peter the Great" tried to find the library immediately after returning from the "Great Embassy" and even carried out excavations in the Kremlin for this.
- After returning from the Great Embassy, “Peter the Great” hid surrounded by conspirators, did not appear in front of the people and did not even visit his closest relatives until the bloody executions of the archers were carried out, and the bloody “initiation” of the new close associates of the impostor had not passed (Surikov’s picture is not corresponds to historical reality). It was precisely Lefort, and perhaps Golovin, who began at the direction of the investigation into the “streltsy rebellion” and the subsequent executions, in fact, became a coup d'état, the purpose of which was primarily to destroy the old armed forces that could oppose the impostor. Secondly, it became a bloody "baptism" of the new nobility - the "new Russians", who for the first time in Russia played the role of executioners.
- In memory of the suppression of the "streltsy rebellion", a medal for the destruction of archers was knocked out, on which Samson was depicted standing over a defeated serpent. All inscriptions are in Latin only. It is known that Samson was from Dan's family, from where, according to the prophecies, the Antichrist should come. It is also noteworthy that "Peter the Great", unlike Tsar Peter I, wore long hair, which is a sign of origin from Dan's family. Later, on the occasion of the victory in the Battle of Poltava, a medal with the image of Samson was also knocked out. Even earlier, a medal was struck on the occasion of the “Great Embassy”, which depicts a horseman slaying a snake (George the Victorious? A strange symbol on the occasion of the trip. In the Masonic lodges of the Scottish rite, one of the symbols is a rider on horseback slaying a snake).
- The people, at that time, spoke directly about the substitution of the king abroad, but these rumors and attempts to clarify this were cruelly suppressed and called a conspiracy or rebellion. It was to prevent such rumors that the Secret Order was formed.
- A change in attitude towards his wife, with whom he lived in harmony for eight years. For the environment of the "king" and historians, the true reason for Peter's cooling towards his wife after returning from abroad is unknown. There are only versions that the tsarina allegedly participated in a conspiracy against her husband, which, generally speaking, is incredible (encouraged the archers to speak out against her husband’s beloved tsar?) and another, that Peter was carried away by Anna Mons (see note). After his return, the “king” did not meet with his wife, Empress Evdokia, and she was immediately sent to a monastery. In exile, Queen Evdokia is in strict isolation, she is even forbidden to talk to anyone. And if this is violated, then the culprit was severely punished (Stepan Glebov, impaled, guarding the queen)
- The abolition of the Patriarchate in Rus' and the subordination of the management of the church to secular power through the Synod, the device of an amusing Council at the choice of the Patriarch.
- An attempt to "protestantize" the Orthodox Church and even put it under the subordination of the Vatican. The subordination of the management of the Orthodox Church to a native of the Vatican, to whom he entrusts the reformation of the Church. He tries to oblige the priests to convey what they say in confession if the penitent speaks of plots against the king or other crimes.
- The introduction of tobacco smoking in Rus', which is considered the greatest sin in Orthodoxy. Encouragement and inculcation of drunkenness.
- Debauchery. The strange behavior of the "king" after his return from abroad is noted. So he always took a soldier to bed with him at night. Later, after the appearance of Catherine, he simultaneously kept concubines. Similar depravity was in the royal palace only under the impostor False Dmitry.
- The murder of Tsarevich Alexei, although in the Orthodox traditions for disobedience, from the point of view of his father, he could only be sent to the monastery, as Tsarevich Alexei asked for.
- The destruction of Russian folk traditions, the fight against them. Establishing the superiority of Latin Western culture over traditional Russian.
- The first reform of the Russian language, which changed the style of Russian letters according to the model of European Latin alphabetic symbols. In Europe, at this time, the Gothic type was also preserved in everyday printing. The old inscription was preserved only in the service books of the Orthodox Church. Such a change probably had some kind of secret mystical meaning associated with the change and reorientation of deep spiritual traditions.
- The transfer of the capital of Russia from Moscow to St. Petersburg to the very outskirts of the Russian Empire, while in the traditions of all states it was the placement of the capital in the center of the state. Perhaps St. Petersburg was conceived by him or his advisers as the capital of a future united Europe, in which Russia, within the borders of Muscovy, was supposed to be a colony?
- The division of the Russian people into nobles and serfs by birth, the introduction of serfdom, in its meaning, corresponding to the creation of a slave-owning state with slaves from its people, in contrast to the ancient states that made slaves only prisoners of war.
- The weakening and even freezing of the development of the Russian economy due to the tightening of ruinous taxes, the introduction of serfdom, the hard labor industry and serf factory workers, the cessation of the development of the regions of the Northern Urals, Arkhangelsk, Eastern Siberia, for almost 150 years until the abolition of serfdom in 1861.
- Tsar Peter visited Arkhangelsk and the Solovetsky Monastery, where he personally made a wooden cross in memory of salvation in a storm. He liked it there. "Peter the Great" consigned Arkhangelsk to oblivion. Only once did he visit Arkhangelsk, in connection with the outbreak of the Northern War, in order to look for defensive capabilities, but at the same time he tried to avoid meeting with old friends and acquaintances.
- Subordination of the foreign policy of the Russian state to the interests of Western European states.
- Creation of a bureaucratic machine of government.
- Establishing the power and control of foreigners in the army, government, science, their privileges over the Russians, giving them titles of nobility, lands and serfs.
- The organization of Masonic lodges (1700) even earlier than in Europe (1721.), which practically seized power in Russian society to this day.
- Construction of the new capital Amsterdam-Venetian (Jewish) model on the bones of Russian Orthodox people. The place for construction was chosen extremely inconvenient in the swamps.
* A staged tragedy called "Streltsky rebellion" was fatally inevitable. It was caused not only by the actions of the conspirators who were preparing the return of Princess Sophia, announcing, almost immediately after the departure of Tsar Peter, that he had been replaced in German. Romodanovsky, who acted as Prince Caesar, understood that the return of the Streltsy troops to Moscow would lead to a riot, and therefore, as best he could, prevented their return, which also strengthened the existing indignation.
** Relations with Anna Mons, who in fact has always been Lefort's mistress, are invented (intentionally?) by rumor. Although the king gave royal gifts to her family for some kind of service. The proof of this is that upon returning from abroad and sending his wife into exile, Anna Mons does not enjoy his attention, and after the sudden death of the young Lefort, Anna Mons is completely under house arrest. Since 1703, Catherine has been living with the "king".
*** There is an assumption that the death of P. Gordon and the "friend" of Peter the young Lefort, upon returning from the Great Embassy, which occurred almost simultaneously in 1699, happened because "Peter the Great" or his secret patrons wanted to get rid of the guardianship of those who contributed to his penetration to the Moscow throne.
The Man in the Iron Mask is the most mysterious prisoner of the reign of Louis XIV, whose mystery has not been fully solved to this day. The only reliable information about him is the number under which he was kept in captivity - 64489001. This man was born approximately in the 1640s, and died in 1698. He was also kept in Pignerol, Eskil, on the island of Saint-Marguerite and the Bastille, where he ended his days.
Historical data
The mysterious prisoner actually wore a mask, but not made of iron, but of black velvet. Its purpose was not to inflict pain, but solely to hide the identity of this person from outsiders. Information about the prisoner was so classified that even the guards themselves did not know who he was. The only exception, perhaps, was Benigne Doverne de Saint-Mar, who was the head of all prisons where the Man in the Iron Mask was imprisoned. The incredible mystery and secrecy that surrounded this prisoner gave rise to many conjectures, legends, versions and theories. However, the Kramola portal cannot fully vouch for the viability and reliability of any of them.
For the first time, information about a certain prisoner in an iron mask appeared in 1745 in a book called Secret Notes on the History of the Persian Court, which was published in Amsterdam. In it, the author wrote that the illegitimate son of the king and duchess de Lavalier, who bore the title of Count of Vermandois, languished in prison under number 64489001. He was allegedly arrested for slapping his brother, the Grand Dauphin.
This version does not stand up to criticism, since the Count of Vermandois was born in 1667 and lived only 16 years, while the mysterious prisoner was taken into custody in 1669, when the count in question was only two years old, and outlived him by as much as two decades.
King's brother
Francois Voltaire suggested that behind the mask of the Iron Man was the blood brother of Louis XIV, whom the king sent to prison in order to get rid of rivals for the throne in this way. It is the personality of the prisoner that determines the mystery with which he was surrounded throughout the entire period of his stay in the dungeons.
The mother of Louis XIV, Anna of Austria, could not get pregnant for a long time, but then she still had a son from extramarital affairs. Subsequently, she still gave birth to the rightful heir to the throne. When Louis found out that he had an older brother, he decided to get rid of him, but he still didn’t go for the murder, but simply sent him to prison, ordering him to put on that same mask to hide his face from those around him.
There was a version that the prisoner was actually the twin brother of Louis XIV. The birth of twin boys in the royal family led to the question of succession to the throne. It is assumed that one of the sons of the royal couple was brought up in secret from society, and Louis, when he grew up and found out about his existence, decided to send his brother to prison.
Ercol Mattioli
One theory says that the mask hid the face of the Italian Hercule Antonio Mattioli, who agreed with the king that he would convince his overlord to give the Casale fortress to the French. However, Mattioli decided to deceive Louis by telling several countries about this agreement, receiving financial rewards for this. Naturally, the king could not leave such an act unpunished, and threw the Italian into prison for life imprisonment.
General Bulond
The secret notes of the French king gave rise to yet another speculation as to who the Man in the Iron Mask really was. Among the legacy of Louis XVI were encrypted diaries, the contents of which were revealed several centuries after they were written by the cryptographer Etienne Bazery. The data obtained as a result of decoding gave reason to assume that the face of General Vivien de Boulogne, who became the culprit in the defeat in one of the battles of the Nine Years War, could be hiding behind the mask.
True Peter the Great
There is an assumption that the famous prisoner under the number 64489001 is actually Peter the Great. Some researchers believe that just in 1698, when the Man in the Iron Mask appeared in the Bastille, the Russian tsar was replaced. It was at this point that Peter the Great his diplomatic mission in Europe. Contemporaries noted that an Orthodox tsar went abroad, honoring the centuries-old traditions that had developed in Russia, and some mummery European returned back, bringing a lot of completely unimaginable innovations. Such cardinal changes gave rise to rumors that the king in Europe was replaced. Later, this substitution was associated with the mystical Iron Mask.
In 1698, a prisoner was brought to the Bastille, whose face was hidden by a terrible iron mask. His name was unknown, and in prison he was numbered 64489001. The created halo of mystery gave rise to many versions of who this masked man could be.
The authorities knew absolutely nothing about the prisoner transferred from another prison. They were ordered to place a masked man in the most deaf cell and not talk to him. Five years later, the prisoner died. He was buried under the name Marchialli. All the belongings of the deceased were burned, and the walls were torn open so that no notes were left.
When the Bastille fell under the onslaught of the French Revolution at the end of the 18th century, the new government released documents that shed light on the fate of the prisoners. But in them there was not a single word about the masked man.
The Jesuit Griffe, who was a confessor in the Bastille at the end of the 17th century, wrote that a prisoner in a velvet (not iron) mask was brought to prison. In addition, the prisoner put it on only when someone appeared in the cell. From a medical point of view, if the prisoner really wore a mask of metal, then this would invariably disfigure his face. The iron mask was “made” by writers who shared their assumptions about who this mysterious prisoner could actually be.
For the first time, a masked prisoner is mentioned in the Secret Notes of the Persian Court, published in 1745 in Amsterdam. According to the Notes, prisoner No. 64489001 was none other than the illegitimate son of Louis XIV and his mistress Louise Françoise de La Vallière. He bore the title of Duke of Vermandois, allegedly slapped his brother the Great Dauphin, for which he landed in jail. In fact, this version is implausible, since the illegitimate son of the French king died at the age of 16 in 1683. And according to the records of the confessor of the Bastille, Jesuit Griffe, an unknown person was imprisoned in 1698, and he died in 1703.
François Voltaire, in his The Age of Louis XIV, written in 1751, first pointed out that the Iron Mask could very well be the twin brother of the Sun King. To avoid problems with the succession to the throne, one of the boys was brought up in secret. When Louis XIV found out about the existence of his brother, he condemned him to eternal imprisonment. This hypothesis so logically explained that the prisoner had a mask that it became the most popular among other versions and was subsequently filmed more than once by directors.
There is an opinion that the famous Italian adventurer Ercol Antonio Mattioli was forced to wear a mask. In 1678, the Italian entered into an agreement with Louis XIV, under which he undertook to force his duke to surrender the fortress of Casale to the king in exchange for a reward of 10,000 skudos. The adventurer took the money, but did not fulfill the contract. Moreover, Mattioli gave this state secret to several other countries for a separate fee. For this betrayal, the French government sent him to the Bastille, forcing him to wear a mask.
Some researchers have put forward very implausible versions of the man in the iron mask. According to one of them, this prisoner could be the Russian Emperor Peter I. It was at that time that Peter I was in Europe with his diplomatic mission (“Great Embassy”). The autocrat was allegedly imprisoned in the Bastille, and a figurehead was sent home instead. Like, how else to explain the fact that the tsar left Russia as a Christian who sacredly honored traditions, and returned back as a typical European who wished to break the patriarchal foundations of Rus'.
In past centuries, with the help of masks, people's faces were not only hidden, but they were also made into real instruments of torture. One of these was
On September 18, 1698, a mysterious prisoner, known in world history under the code name "Iron Mask", was transferred to the Bastille. Who this unknown, but famous prisoner was, we can only guess and rely on the long-hackneyed phrase that the secret sooner or later, but still becomes clear. However, 316 years have passed since that time, but the secret of the Iron Mask remains a mystery for us, shrouded in the darkness of obscurity. And, nevertheless, there are still people in the world who are trying to look behind the historical screen of the past and tear off the mask from the mysterious prisoner in order to find out not only his name, but also the possible reasons for the imprisonment of the prisoner in the Bastille, notorious for all ages. Let us also try to make a small contribution to this more than three centuries of “investigation” and silence and at least speculate about those historical events that took place then not only in “civilized” Europe, but also in “godlessly backward” Russia.
From history we know about the Great Embassy of 1697-1698. This period is famous for the fact that from Russia, where drunkenness was considered a sin and subject to punishment, leaving his beloved wife, Tsarina Evdokia, but corresponding with her and remaining in excellent relations with his mentor Gordon and friend Lefort, Peter the Great "incognito" travels abroad. Goes under the name Mikhailov. And he goes to Europe, you should pay attention, at the suggestion of Gordon and Lefort.
When reading this preamble, an inquisitive reader may immediately have at least one rhetorical question: “Why is the trip of Peter the Great, which happened in the period from 1697 to 1698, called the Great Embassy, if he went to Europe incognito under the name Mikhailov?”. In addition, we know that Peter the Great was young - at that time he was 26 years old, and he was quite healthy, there was a mole on his cheek. The courtier amazed his interlocutors with his education, he knew mathematics, astronomy, military engineering. The young tsar was surrounded by a team consisting exclusively of Russians ...
Two years later (in 1698), Peter the Great returned to Russia taller, looked at least 10 years older than his years, without a mole, suffered from chronic tropical fever, spoke Russian terribly poorly and wrote in Latin. Unlike Peter, who left, he amazed those around him with his lack of education and ignorance. Moreover, he returned in the embassy team, consisting of only foreigners (except Menshikov). And at this time, in the Bastille in 1698, the "Iron Mask" appears, under the name Marchiel. In the French film of the same name, a version was shown about one of the illegitimate sons of Louis IV.
After returning home, Peter never put on royal clothes and a crown, since the departing king was shorter and denser than the arriving king. Upon arrival, Peter did not let his wife near him, who bore him 3 sons (the third of them, presumably, Pavel). He did not let all the household members who knew the king well before his "Great Embassy" to Europe. He immediately sent his wife Evdokia to a monastery.
What happened next? And then the following happened: friend Lefort and mentor Gordon suddenly die, children Alexander (Natalya and Lavrenty - the information is contradictory) - were killed, Alexei was later sentenced to death. Next, readers should be reminded of the famous in the 1970s film directed by Leonid Gaidai "Ivan Vasilyevich Changes Profession", based on the work of Mikhail Bulgakov. Do you remember how archers chased after the heroes of the film Bunshey (Yu. Yakovlev) and George Miloslavsky (L. Kuravlyov), recognizing an impostor and a demon in the king? This scene, albeit remotely, but resembles a rebellion of archers (the king is not real) and the hanging of Queen Sophia. Let us briefly recall these distant events. In March 1698, 175 archers from 4 archery regiments that participated in the Azov campaigns of Peter I 1695-1696 appeared in Moscow, urgently called by Tsarevna Sofya Alekseevna. Sofya Alekseevna claimed that Peter I was not her brother, which means that during his 2-year departure to Europe, a substitution took place. They arrived to protect the princess. An attempt by the Moscow authorities to arrest in Moscow their petitioners for a conspiracy failed. The archers took refuge in the settlements and established contact with Tsarevna Sofya Alekseevna, who was imprisoned in the Novodevichy Convent; On April 4, 1698, the soldiers of the Semyonovsky regiment were sent against the archers, who, with the assistance of the townspeople, “knocked out” the rebellious archers from the capital. The archers returned to their regiments, which then began to ferment. On June 6, the archers displaced their chiefs, elected 4 elected representatives in each regiment, and headed for Moscow. The rebels (2200 people) intended to enthrone Princess Sophia or, in case of her refusal, V.V. Golitsyn, who was in exile. The government sent the Preobrazhensky, Semyonovsky, Lefortovsky and Butyrsky regiments (about 4000 people) against the archers, as well as the noble cavalry under the command of A.S. Shein, General P. Gordon and Lieutenant General Prince I.M. Koltsov-Mosalsky. It is noteworthy that in the battle near the Resurrection Monastery, the government involved troops commanded by foreigners, General P. Gordon, Major Nikolai von Salm, Lieutenant Colonel I.I. Angler, Colonel Yu.S. Lim, Colonel de Graguet. Streltsy were defeated, and then executed. Peter the Great cut off the heads of five of them with his own hand.
Then there was the “circumcision” of the All-World Charter to the level of the ABC of 1700, the genocide of the peoples of Siberia and the Far East, the imposition of serfdom, and vodka, tobacco and ... debauchery appeared in Russia. Under pain of execution, all written documents and books were collected, and no one else saw them. Many elders were killed, almost all the spiritual places of Western Siberia were destroyed, along with the walls, China and partially Turkestan were irretrievably lost, the Great Silk Roads stopped working. Greedy foreigners flooded our land, an abundance of Masonic lodges and the Order of the Jesuits appeared in the country. In connection with all this, some researchers consider the uprising of Emelyan Pugachev not as a rebellion, but as a civil war for the succession to the throne of the true king against the heirs of the emperor, who received the nickname "Antichrist" from the people.
The reader may have a question addressed directly to the author of these lines: they say, why was this article written? In order to break some dividends? No, I assure you. The best dividends for me are if the implausible, but true truth, having passed through the labyrinths of the secret services archives forbidden for the Russian people, will one day come out, and then we will understand why all these years we have been “hammered” with the idea of the “backwardness” of Russia and civilization "enlightened" West. We will also understand why the people in Russia still live, if not below the poverty line, then at least much worse (materially) than people in the developed Western countries of the so-called golden billion. There is no smoke without fire, the Russian proverb says, and therefore we can assume that the version that during the so-called Great Embassy, the real Russian Tsar was replaced by a fake one, has the right to live. In any case, until all the circumstances directly related to this are disclosed. History holds many secrets.
Vasily Veikki
Reviews
Reasoning of an amateur. During the great embassy, a truce was concluded with the Ottoman Empire for 2 years, a 40,000-strong army was sent to the Polish borders, and Augustus II was placed on the Polish throne instead of the "pro-French" de Conti. Moreover, France advocated a war with Turkey. Another consequence of the embassy is the war for the Baltic. This is just what I remember offhand. Russia's direct intervention in European politics. Europe, judging by this article, is its own enemy. The embassy, for the most part, returned completely. Because of the Streltsy rebellion, Peter hastily returned to Russia as a separate group. The second part of the embassy returned later. I note that the rebellion of the archers began with the early return of Peter, and not as indicated in the article. One gets the feeling of the ordered tone of the article or the lack of education of the author.
Not alone. Agree. But this is not an argument. Currently, the story is passed through the prism of alternative versions. And there are thousands of great historians who are far from science. Versions - even more. Only knowledge - zero. It is much easier to come up with a fairy tale than to collect information and conduct an analysis.
Peter the First
"Peter the Great"
aka Pete Groysman.
Reforms that killed Russia
The most effective way to manage us is to replace the leader.
evidence of a satanic coup in Russia.
I will point out only one author D.S. Merezhkovsky.
In his work “Antichrist”, he noted a complete change in the appearance, character and psyche of Tsar Peter I after his return from the “German lands”, where he went for two weeks, and returned two years later. The Russian embassy that accompanied the tsar consisted of 20 people, and was headed by A.D. Menshikov.
After returning to Russia, this embassy consisted of only the Dutch (including the notorious Lefort), only Menshikov remained the only one from the old composition.
This "embassy" brought a completely different tsar, who spoke Russian poorly, did not recognize his friends and relatives, which immediately betrayed a substitution:
This forced Tsarina Sophia, the sister of the real Tsar Peter I, to raise archers against the impostor.
As you know, the Streltsy rebellion was brutally suppressed,
Sophia was hung on the Spassky Gate of the Kremlin,
the impostor exiled the wife of Peter 1 to a monastery, where she never arrived,
and called his from Holland.
"His" brother Ivan V
and “his” little children Alexander, Natalya and Lavrenty False Peter immediately killed,
although the official story tells us quite differently about it.
And he executed the youngest son Alexei as soon as he tried to free his real father from the Bastille.
Peter the impostor did such transformations with Russia that we are still echoing around.
He began to act like an ordinary conqueror:
- defeated the Russian self-government - "zemstvo" and replaced it with the bureaucratic apparatus of foreigners,
who brought theft, debauchery and drunkenness to Russia and vigorously planted it here;
He transferred the peasants to the property of the nobles, which turned them into slaves
(to whiten the image of the impostor, this "event" falls on Ivan IV);
He defeated the merchants and began to plant industrialists, which led to the destruction of the former universality of people;
He defeated the clergy - the bearers of Russian culture and destroyed Orthodoxy, bringing it closer to Catholicism,
which inevitably gave birth to atheism;
- Introduced smoking, drinking alcohol and coffee;
- destroyed the ancient Russian calendar, rejuvenating our civilization by 5503 years;
- ordered all Russian chronicles to be brought to St. Petersburg, and then, like Filaret, he ordered them to be burned.
He called on the German "professors" to write a completely different Russian history;
- under the guise of a struggle with the old faith, he destroyed all the elders who lived for more than three hundred years;
- banned the cultivation of amaranth and the use of amaranth bread, which was the main food of the Russian people,
how he destroyed longevity on Earth, which then remained in Russia;
- abolished natural measures: a fathom, a finger, an elbow, an inch, which were present in clothing, utensils and architecture,
making them fixed in the Western manner.
This led to the destruction of ancient Russian architecture and art, to the disappearance of the beauty of everyday life.
As a result, people ceased to be beautiful, since divine and vital proportions disappeared in their structure;
- replaced the Russian title system with the European one, which turned the peasants into an estate.
Although the "peasant" is a title, higher than the king, about which there is more than one evidence;
- destroyed the Russian script, which consisted of 151 characters, and introduced 43 characters of the Cyril and Methodius script;
- disarmed the Russian army, exterminating the archers as a caste with their miraculous abilities and magical weapons,
introduced primitive firearms and stabbing weapons in a European manner, first dressing the army in French,
and then into the German uniform, although the Russian military uniform was itself a weapon.
Among the people, the new regiments were called "amusing".
But his main crime is the destruction of Russian education (image + sculpture),
the essence of which was to create three subtle bodies in a person, which he does not receive from birth,
and if they are not formed, then the consciousness will not have a connection with the consciousnesses of past lives.
If in Russian educational institutions a generalist was made from a person who could, starting from bast shoes and ending with a spaceship, do everything himself, then Peter introduced a specialization that made him dependent on others.
Before Peter the Pretender, people in Russia did not know what wine was, he ordered barrels of wine to be rolled out onto the square and the townspeople to drink for free.
This was done to ward off the memory of a past life.
During the period of Peter, the persecution of babies who were born, remembering their past lives and able to speak, continued. Their persecution began with John IV.
The mass destruction of infants with past life memories cast a curse on all incarnations of such children.
It is no coincidence that today, when a talking child is born, he lives no more than two hours.
(but there are rare exceptions)
After all these deeds, the invaders themselves did not dare to call Peter the Great for a long time.
And only in the 19th century, when the horrors of Peter the Great had already been forgotten, did a version arose about Peter the innovator, who did so much useful for Russia, even brought potatoes and tomatoes from Europe, allegedly brought there from America.
Solanaceae (potatoes, tomatoes) were widely represented in Europe even before Peter.
Their endemic and very ancient presence on this continent is confirmed by the great diversity of species,
for which it took more than one thousand years.
On the contrary, it is known that it was during the time of Peter that a campaign was launched against witchcraft, in other words, food culture (today the word "witchcraft" is used in a sharply negative sense).
Before Peter there were 108 types of nuts, 108 types of vegetables, 108 types of fruits, 108 types of berries, 108 types of root nodules, 108 types of cereals, 108 spices and 108 types of fruits *, corresponding to 108 - Russian gods.
After Peter, there were units of sacred species used for food, which a person can see for himself.
In Europe, this was done even earlier.
Cereals, fruits and nodules were especially destroyed, since they were associated with the reincarnation of a person. The only thing that Peter the impostor did was allowed to cultivate potatoes
(potatoes, like tobacco, belong to the nightshade family. Leaves, eyes and green potatoes are poisonous.
Green potatoes contain very strong poisons, solanines, which are especially dangerous for the health of children.),
sweet potato and earthen pear, which are poorly eaten today.
The destruction of sacred plants consumed at a certain time led to the loss of complex divine reactions of the body (remember the Russian proverb “every vegetable has its own time”).
Moreover, the mixing of food caused putrefactive processes in the body, and now people exude stench instead of fragrance.
Adoptogenic plants have almost disappeared, only weakly active ones remain:
"root of life", lemongrass, lure, golden root.
They contributed to the adaptation of a person to difficult conditions and kept a person young and healthy.
There are absolutely no plants-metamorphizers left that contribute to various metamorphoses of the body and appearance, for 20 years it was found in the mountains of Tibet "The Sacred Coil", and even that has disappeared today.
The campaign to impoverish our diet continues and at present, Kalega and sorghum have almost disappeared from consumption, it is forbidden to grow poppies.
From many sacred gifts, only the names remain, which are given to us today as synonyms for famous fruits.
For example: pruhva, kaliva, bukhma, landushka, which are passed off as swede, or armud, kvit, pigwa, gutey, gun - disappeared gifts that are passed off as quince.
Kukish and dulya in the 19th century denoted a pear, although these were completely different gifts, today these words are used to call the image of a fig (also, by the way, a gift).
A fist with an inserted thumb, used to denote the mudra of the heart, today it is used as a negative sign.
Dulya, figs and figs were no longer grown, because they were sacred plants among the Khazars and Varangians.
Already recently, proska has been called “millet”, barley - barley, and millet and barley cereals have disappeared forever from the humankind of agriculture.
What happened to the real Peter I?
The real Peter 1...Where was he?
He was captured by the Jesuits and placed in a Swedish fortress. He managed to deliver a letter to Charles XII, King of Sweden,
and he rescued him from captivity.
Together they organized a campaign against the impostor, but the entire Jesuit-Masonic fraternity of Europe, called to fight,
together with the Russian troops (whose relatives were taken hostage in case the troops decide to go over to the side of Charles), she won at Poltava.
The real Russian Tsar Peter I was again captured and placed away from Russia - in the Bastille, where he later died.
An iron mask was put on his face, which caused a lot of talk in France and Europe.
The Swedish king Charles XII fled to Turkey, from where he tried again to organize a campaign against the impostor.
It would seem, kill the real Peter, and there would be no trouble.
But the fact of the matter is, the invaders of the Earth needed a conflict, and without a living king behind bars, neither the Russian-Swedish war nor the Russian-Turkish war would have succeeded, which in fact were civil wars that led to the formation of two new states :
Turkey and Sweden, and then a few more.
But the real intrigue was not only in the creation of new states.
In the 18th century, all of Russia knew and talked about the fact that Peter I was not a real tsar, but an impostor.
And against this background, the “great Russian historians” who arrived from the German lands: Miller, Bayer, Schlozer and Kuhn, who completely distorted the history of Russia, no longer presented any particular difficulty in declaring all the Dmitriev tsars False Dmitrys and impostors who did not have the right to the throne, and who did not managed to groan, they changed the royal surname to - Rurik.
The genius of Satanism is Roman law, which is the basis of the constitutions of modern states.
It was created contrary to all ancient canons and ideas about a society based on self-government (autocracy).
For the first time, judicial power was transferred from the hands of the priests to the hands of people who do not have a spiritual dignity,
those. the power of the best was replaced by the power of anyone.
Roman law is presented to us as the “crown” of human achievement, in reality it is the pinnacle of disorder and irresponsibility.
State laws under Roman law are based on prohibitions and punishments, i.e. on negative emotions, which, as you know, can only destroy.
This leads to a general lack of interest in the implementation of laws and to opposition of officials to the people.
Even in the circus, work with animals is based not only on a whip, but also on a carrot, but a person on our planet is rated lower than animals by conquerors.
In contrast to Roman law, the Russian state was built not on prohibitive laws, but on the conscience of citizens, which strikes a balance between encouragement and prohibition.
Let us recall how the Byzantine historian Procopius of Caesarea wrote about the Slavs: "They had all the laws in their heads."
In the middle of the 90s of the last century, on the Russian reformed television, when it was still sometimes possible to show everything, the Fifth Wheel program was broadcast. One of the programs of the "Fifth Wheel" was devoted to a documentary showing of unknown pages from the life of the V. Ulyanov family. For seventy years of Soviet power, we were accustomed to a virtual idealized artistic and historical image of Lenin, and here is some kind of vulgar opposite. And here is what the authors of the program found. Here I will not mention the moral climate that "reigned" in this deeply unhappy family and the cause of which was V. Ulyanov's mother, but I will go straight to the point. As the authors of the program found out, not quite the same V. Ulyanov, who was born in Simbirsk, returned from Switzerland to Russia. Why did such a substitution take place and why was this secret kept by many people and even his relatives and is the main party secret? One can only guess, but one can guess.
In all likelihood, V. Ulyanov died under the wheels of a car in Switzerland in 1910. It was no longer possible to establish whether it was an accident or an attempt, unless any documents are opened. As a result of this accident, the party was left without money, which was already in the bank in his name and which were still to come. It was impossible to re-register them to heirs or to another name, taking into account their specific sources. V. Ulyanov was urgently "revived", which was beneficial to everyone, and first of all to the culprit of the incident. There was a court that decided to reimburse the cost of a completely mangled bicycle to V. Ulyanov, who escaped with only minor bruises. Somewhere since then, V. Ulyanov (Lenin) appeared. But it seems that misfortune haunted anyone who took these names. In 1918, as a result of internal party disassembly, the second one was also killed. The image of the "liberator" of Russia from the tsarist oppression and the bourgeoisie was so "hyped" among the people and in the world that his death could have irreversible consequences for the power of the Bolsheviks. They found a third one, either a drug addict or a mentally ill person, a bit like the first two. It is his lifetime photographs taken in Gorki that can scare people. Who lies in the mausoleum on Red Square is also unknown. Publicist Yuri Vorobyevsky in the book “The Path to the Apocalypse. The Omega Point" tells that the "Bolshevik" magicians performed over the still living "leader", specially selected according to the signs known to them, some kind of Egyptian satanic ritual - a sacrifice that turned the corpse, a tortured person into a mummy for popular worship. And here's another note. Under the Soviet regime, the following order was always in effect: “All lifetime photographs or documents relating to V. Ulyanov (Lenin)” were to be handed over to the Soviet authorities. The secret storage of such materials was punishable by death.”
The note;
In history, only those rulers who caused the most irreparable harm to their peoples were called "great".
If such trends continue, then the Russian people will receive the most recent historical figure - "Vladimir the Great" or, in Western terms, "Vlad Groysman" ..
