17 circumflexus
1 caput mundi
"head of the world" i.e. the center of the universe.
The name of ancient Rome as the capital of the world empire.
How could the caput mundi, as Rome was in antiquity, be satisfied with such a platform, where temples and palaces were crammed without the slightest space and perspective. (P. D. Boborykin, The Eternal City.)
2 Lumen mundi
Light of the world.
Source - Matthew 5.14: Vos estis lux mundi. Non potest civitas abscondi supra montem posita. "You are the light of the world. A city standing on top of a mountain cannot hide."
Words of Christ addressed to the disciples.
Shortly after the liberation story, the student Schurz declared in Paris that the Kinkel he was using, as he well knew, was of course not a lumen mundi, while it was he, Schurz, and no one else, who was called to be the future president of the German Republic. (K. Marx and F. Engels, Great men of emigration.)
Nothing can be more stupid than a smart person when he is outside his sphere: he thinks where you just need to act, and resembles Krylov's fable "Cabin". How often in the course of my life have I coveted the acquaintance of so-called intelligent people, "luminum mundi", and I have almost always been fools. (Russian antiquity, 1892, August.)
3 Sic transit gloria mundi
This is how worldly glory passes.
A phrase with which they address the future pope during his elevation to this rank, while burning a piece of cloth in front of him as a sign of the illusory nature of earthly power.
The expression is borrowed from a theological treatise belonging to the famous German mystic of the 15th century. Thomas of Kempis, "On the Imitation of Christ", I, 3, 6: O quam cito transit gloria mundi "Oh, how soon earthly glory passes."
What happened to poor Clemenceau, if even some Derulede can poison him! Sic transit gloria mundi! (F. Engels - Laure Lafargue, June 20, 1893.)
The “Northern bee”, which once crawled in front of its beloved poet in order to profit from him at least a dewdrop of sweet honey, now dares to buzz to him in greeting that in his last poems - Pushkin has become obsolete! Sic transit gloria mundi... (H. G. Chernyshevsky, Aesthetics and literary criticism.)
Pierre, as in a dream, saw in the weak light of the alcohol fire several people who, in the same aprons as Rhetor, stood against him and held swords aimed at his chest. Between them stood a man in a bloody white shirt. Seeing him, Pierre moved his sword forward with his chest, wanting them to pierce him. But the swords moved away from him, and they immediately put on the bandage again. “Now you have seen a small light,” a voice told him. Then the candles were lit again, they said that he needed to see the full light, and again they took off the bandage, and suddenly more than ten voices said: Sic transit gloria mundi. (L. N. Tolstoy, War and Peace.)
Speaking about contemporary political events, Lev Nikolaevich said: - the same with patriotism: unconsciously sympathy is on the side of Russia and its successes and you catch yourself on this. And look, with all these internal and external troubles, suddenly one fine day Russia may fall apart, as they say: sic transit gloria mundi. (A. B. Goldenweiser, Near Tolstoy.)
Katya did not stare at anyone, at anyone except ... me, with whom she was only occasionally somewhat capricious, but not at all proud, but sympathetic; while with others she was constantly both proud and dismissively unresponsive. Then she left Petersburg for the village to her father and married... my coachman... Sic transit gloria mundi (this is how the glory of the world disappears). (N. P. Makarov, My seventy-year memories.)
□ The struggle of our Narodniks "against capitalism" is degenerating more and more into an alliance with tsarism. The best criticism that could be made of this magnificent "program" is the "Communist Manifesto" (on "true German socialism"). Sic transit gloria of the Narodniks. (G. V. Plekhanov - F. Engels, 1895.)
□ The most worthy Shah of Persia is hardly able to hold on with the help of our detachment, which guards exclusively the safety of foreigners. The wise Persian sultan - oh, my heart bleeds - sits alone in the castle-prison, and no one knows where he will come out of there - into exile or to the chopping block. Sic transit... light from the east. (VV Vorovsky, To whom shall we go? To whom shall we extend our hands?)
4 Theatrum mundi
World arena.
The wide connections that the City had with the commercial aces of the United Kingdom, and the influence of these aces on their clerks, on the employees of the trading firms and on the "smaller" commercial agents, will undoubtedly enable them to quietly, behind everyone's backs, fill out - petitions with signatures and then send them to " Honorable Chamber" with the inscription: the voice of the English people. However, these gentlemen are mistaken if they think to intimidate the government with these signatures collected through begging, intrigues and intrigues. The government watched with ironic complacency as the supporters of the Association were whistled off the theatrum mundi. (K. Marx, Administrative Reform Association.)
When the theorists themselves take up historical constructions, they jump over the whole past with the greatest haste, immediately passing from "Mongolianism" to a truly "substantial" history, namely, to the history of "Hallische Jahrbucher" and "Deutsche Jahrbücher" and to the history of the degeneration of the Hegelian school. into a general brawl. All other nations and all real events are forgotten, theatrum mundi is limited to the Leipzig book fair ... (K. Marx and F. Engels, German Ideology.)
5 Transit gloria mundi
6 Agnus Dei qui tollis peccata mundi, dona eis requiem sempiternam
"Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world, grant them eternal rest."
Source - Gospel of John, 1.29.
Words from the Catholic liturgy addressed to Jesus Christ.
Maria de la Paz, in her decline, had acquired the habit of sleeping after dinner, and already during the last "agnus dei" she reverently closed her eyes. (Benito Perez Galdos, The Golden Fountain.)
7 Pro mundi beneficio
"For the good of the world."
Motto of Panama.
8 Sic transit gloria mundi
so passes earthly glory
9 anticipator
10 apte
aptē [aptus]
4) accordingly, with regard to (a. cum genere ipso orationis C)
6) successful, expedient facere, loqui C)
11 artificiosus
12 axis
I (assis), is m. II axis, is m. (abl. ax, rarely axī)
13 cado
cecidī, casūrus, ere
14 cardo
1) door hook, door hinge
c. duplex C- both poles, world axis
4) time (year), time
5) belt, zone
8) essence, essence (causae, lithium, O; sermonis Aug)
9) critical, turning point, decisive moment
15 circuitus
16 circulus
1) circle, circle c. auto orbis C) ; parallel circle (segmenta mundi, quae nostri circulos appellavēre, Graeci paralleles PM)
lacteus c. PM(also lacteus orbis C) - Milky Way
SIC TRANSIT GLORIA MUNDI
Translation:
This is how worldly glory passes.
A phrase with which they address the future pope during his elevation to this rank, while burning a piece of cloth in front of him as a sign of the illusory nature of earthly power.
The expression is borrowed from a theological treatise belonging to the famous German mystic of the 15th century. Thomas of Kempis, "On the Imitation of Christ", I, 3, 6: O quam cito transit gloria mundi "Oh, how soon earthly glory passes."
What happened to poor Clemenceau, if even some Derulede can poison him! Sic transit gloria mundi! ( F. Engels - Laure Lafargue, June 20, 1893.)
The “Northern bee”, which once crawled in front of its beloved poet in order to profit from him at least a dewdrop of sweet honey, now dares to buzz to him in greeting that in his last poems - Pushkin has become obsolete! Sic transit gloria mundi... H. G. Chernyshevsky, Aesthetics and literary criticism.)
Pierre, as in a dream, saw in the weak light of the alcohol fire several people who, in the same aprons as Rhetor, stood against him and held swords aimed at his chest. Between them stood a man in a bloody white shirt. Seeing him, Pierre moved his sword forward with his chest, wanting them to pierce him. But the swords moved away from him, and they immediately put on the bandage again. “Now you have seen a small light,” a voice told him. Then the candles were lit again, they said that he needed to see the full light, and again they took off the bandage, and suddenly more than ten voices said: Sic transit gloria mundi. ( L. N. Tolstoy, War and Peace.)
Speaking about contemporary political events, Lev Nikolaevich said: - the same with patriotism: unconsciously sympathy is on the side of Russia and its successes and you catch yourself on this. And look, with all these internal and external troubles, suddenly one fine day Russia may fall apart, as they say: sic transit gloria mundi. ( A. B. Goldenweiser, Near Tolstoy.)
Katya did not stare at anyone, at anyone except ... me, with whom she was only occasionally somewhat capricious, but not at all proud, but sympathetic; while with others she was constantly both proud and dismissively unresponsive. Then she left Petersburg for the village to her father and married... my coachman... Sic transit gloria mundi (this is how the glory of the world disappears). ( N. P. Makarov, My seventy-year memories.)
□ The struggle of our Narodniks "against capitalism" is degenerating more and more into an alliance with tsarism. The best criticism that could be made of this magnificent "program" is the "Communist Manifesto" (on "true German socialism"). Sic transit gloria of the Narodniks. ( G. V. Plekhanov - F. Engels, 1895.)
□ The most worthy Shah of Persia is hardly able to hold on with the help of our detachment, which guards exclusively the safety of foreigners. The wise Persian sultan - oh, my heart bleeds - sits alone in the castle-prison, and no one knows where he will come out of there - into exile or to the chopping block. Sic transit... light from the east. ( VV Vorovsky, To whom shall we go? To whom shall we extend our hands?)
You lived like lightning, once flashed and died out. And lightning strikes the sky. And the sky is eternal. And this is my consolation.
(Chingiz Aitmatov. White ship)
For there to be a reflection of the world, the world must have a form. For there to be a reflection of a person and his deeds, an unusual person is needed, because only then will his deeds remain in the memory of the peoples.
In the human chronology of the events of the past, which are mistakenly called history, there is a unique paradox: during periods of getting rid of the influence of the official Church of the Church, there is no departure from Christianity. Moreover, on the contrary, an ever stronger interest was shown in Christianity, the attitude towards it became more personal, deeper, based on logic and one's own experiences. As soon as a person begins to think about the teachings of Jesus, carrying out his own initiatives and independently learning the simple words of Holy Scripture, without looking back at the dogmas of the Church, when he begins to speak about the Savior in a language that he understands, the need arises for his own awareness of those ancient events. Surprisingly, Christ, from a deified statue, begins to turn into a completely accessible person, to whom everything earthly is not alien, into a scientist and naturalist, into a philosopher and even a military leader, of course, carrying the main essence as a Teacher. Science and culture begin to develop, human thought itself ventures into the secret, and finds many answers in Christianity itself. If you remove church dogmas and canons, lower the crucifix symbol of death from the pedestal, then the natural and natural greatness of the son of man arises, who needs nothing: neither the gilded columns of temples, nor their rich decorations, nor the well-fed and glorifying clergy, nothing of what is in Church offers a wide range. There is a realization that the temple is around us and we ourselves create it with our own deeds. After all, everything that happens to us is the work of ourselves. Of course, many will talk about evil fate, destiny, just bad luck, trust fortune-telling on Tarot cards and astrology, but common sense tells us that all this was inspired by those who desired our ignorance - the category of "cunning and fast, now ministers." But the universe lives by other laws. No matter how you remake it, no matter how you educate people in the matrix consciousness, realities always win over fantasies and the truth comes out.
Sic transit gloria mundi (from Latin; -; “Thus passes worldly glory”) - an expression that is a slight alteration of the text from the book of the German mystic philosopher Thomas Kempis (XV century) “On the Imitation of Christ” (I, 3, 6 ): “Oh, how soon worldly glory passes” (lat. O quam cito transit gloria mundi). These words sound like an exclamation during the inauguration ceremony of the new pope, in front of whom a piece of cloth is burned three times - as a sign that everything earthly, including the power and glory he receives, is illusory, changeable and perishable. According to the papists themselves, the words are very ancient and have been used in itronization, almost since the time of the Apostle Peter. However, a careful study of the literature of the Middle Ages indicates that they belong to this time.
In general, the story with this expression and the book in which it first appeared is not as unambiguous as it is portrayed today in the Vatican. For example, the authorship of Thomas a Kempis is disputed by the French, referring the book to another French author, while the Italians have their own views.
And the author himself prefers to remain anonymous:
“Do not be tempted by the name of the writer, whether it has great or small glory among writers: let the love of pure truth alone draw you to reading. Don't ask who said, listen to what is said"
(Book 1, chapter V). "Imitation of Christ"
Be that as it may, any person who is a little familiar with the works of medieval scholastics and the teachings of Hinduism will instantly identify not only parallels, but also entire passages taken from the Bhagavad Gita and the Upanishads.
The Upanishads are ancient Indian treatises of a religious and philosophical nature. They are part of the Vedas and belong to the sacred scriptures of Hinduism of the Shruti category. They mainly discuss philosophy, meditation, and the nature of God. It is believed that the Upanishads set out the main essence of the Vedas - therefore they are also called "Vedanta" (end, completion of the Vedas), and they are the basis of Vedantic Hinduism. The Upanishads mainly describe the impersonal Brahman (Jesus Christ).
Why did I explain this? Yes, because it would be clear to the reader: what is attributed to Thomas of Kempis actually has its origins in the Vedas and the Jesuits simply used the old knowledge of our ancestors. That is why the nameless author writes that you should not be interested in the name of the person who wrote the book, since those who lived at that time perfectly understood where the texts were taken from. By the way, this is the most respected book in the Jesuit order, attributed to him and considered their official work. However, there is a discrepancy in history with this literature. In any reference book, you will read that Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Jesuit order, who lived in 1491-1556, read to her. However, according to the Vatican itself, Thomas wrote the book either in 1417 or in 1427. But at that time they had not yet heard of any order of the Jesuits! It will appear only in 1534, and will be approved by the pope in 1540. Almost 100 years after, as it were, the writing of the treatise.
This is a vivid example of how the Jesuits let it slip and gave away the secret of creating this book in their depths, and then, having come up with several authors, took it to the beginning of the 15th century.
Let's take an interest in the personality of Thomas of Kempis, who is identified by historians as a regular canon of the medieval Augustinian Catholic order. At the first approach to his image, a stable impression of falsification arises. The thing is that there is a different interpretation of the concepts of canon and clergy, adopted in the Catholic Church.
Strictly speaking, a canon is an ordinary cleric, entered into the canon or simply into the lists of the diocese. The difference between them was fixed by the Basel Cathedral in 1431-1449, which decided that only a priest with a completed university education and a scientific degree could be a canon. However, nothing similar can be said about Thomas - he did not graduate from the university. In 1392, Thomas, following his brother Jan, entered the school in Deventer in the Utrecht bishopric. He studied until 1399 and that was the end of his education. He could not have been a canon in any way, since he was born in 1379, entered school at the age of 11, and graduated from it at 20.
In the early church, in the capital cities of the diocese, 12 priests and 7 deacons were appointed to assist the bishop. They will become canons. When the period of the formation of the institute of chapters began in the Catholic Church, this clergy was divided into secular canons (serving priests or ordinary priests in the diocese) and regular (monks - not members of the chapter) canons. In Russia it is white and black clergy.
Now let me explain what a chapter is. In Catholicism and in some branches of Protestantism, this is a college (council) of clergy at the episcopal chair (cathedral chapter) or collegiate church (collegiate chapter). Members of the chapter are called canons. That is, a canon is a person with a university education, an academic degree (Master, Candidate, Doctor) and an academic title of CLIRIC (Professor, Associate Professor, Academician, Corresponding Member, Counsellor, Adjunct). Moreover, having, as a rule, a spiritual dignity.
Today, the Catholic Church is trying to blur the distinction between academic degree and academic title in Medieval clerics and canons. However, few modern people understand the modern gradation of scientific degrees and titles, understanding by them simply scientists.
The reason for the church blurring the difference between degree and title is also very unpleasant for the church itself. The thing is that in the 17-18 centuries, when the mass falsification of history by the Vatican was carried out, an unfortunate blunder was made, which turned out for the same reason of not understanding the difference between a degree and a title. Strictly speaking, science was then just forming its hierarchy and it was extremely difficult to understand the intricacies of its structure, especially since they tried to keep it within the Church. I myself am a professor, and my red robe with a golden hood is nothing but the legacy of the cassocks of canons and clerics. Indeed, today the Western system of science has been adopted at universities, and hence the Western traditions, starting with the Latin Gaudeamus.
So what was the blunder of the falsifiers?
The fact is that regular clerics are monastic orders of the Catholic Church, whose members are engaged in pastoral activities, as well as education and charity work. Pure theological science! And THEATINES in 1524 became the FIRST ORDER OF REGULAR CLIRIKS.
That is, both clergy and canons, as well as the chapter, appeared only in the middle of the 16th century, and Thomas of Kempis from the 14th-15th centuries simply could not be a regular canon, since such people did not yet exist.
Until the end of the 16th century, about a dozen orders of regular clerics were formed, the most famous and numerous of which were the Jesuits.
Excuse me, but what about the Council of Basel in 1431-1449, which ruled that only a priest with a completed university education and a degree could be a canon? There are no canons, but there is a cathedral according to them, it doesn’t fit through any gate!
And here a saving legend is invented about the Augustinian order, which existed in such deep times, which is terrible to say. It's no joke, a Christian order that lived in the 5th century, long before the birth of Christ in the 12th century (read my works, about Andronicus Comnenus)! That's when the need arose to transfer Christmas from the 12th century to the 1st century AD. The Vatican needed the antiquity of its Church, and, of course, those who could prove this antiquity were learned canons and clerics. They began to be replicated with astonishing speed, often being confused with the Greek and Roman luminaries of science, who also had nothing to do with modern antiquity. All this is the MIDDLE AGES of the 16th-18th centuries.
And when the Jesuits fell into the hands of the Bhagavad Gita and the teachings of the Upanishads, the order realized that before them was ancient royal Christianity, the faith of the kings-khans of the Great Tartary, the Mongol Empire of the Slavs, tribal Christianity retold in the Indian epic that existed before modern folk apostolic Christianity. I wrote about this in the work “The Indochinese Campaign of the Holy Family”, where I explained that what we now see in Tibet, China, India is the faith that was previously in Rus' before the Battle of Kulikovo and even before the Time of Troubles. This is royal generic Christianity, now presented as Buddhism and Hinduism, of course, adjusted for time and performance. Before us are the Old Believers-bespriests, only numerous Hindu and Buddhist concords.
The realization that the manuscript, on the basis of which the four books "On the Imitation of Christ" were created, could pose a threat to the entire falsification of Catholicism, led the Jesuits to the idea of \u200b\u200bcreating the same book, but in a revised version, as the work and discovery of Western theologians.
Swami Vivekananda, a 19th-century Hindu philosopher and founder of the Vedanta Society, drew many parallels between the Imitation of Christ teaching and the Bhagavad Gita. Vivekananda translated the treatise in 1899 and wrote a preface to it. He always carried with him copies of The Imitation of Christ and the Bhagavad Gita. The trouble with this philosopher was that he did not understand that he was translating what had been stolen from the Hindus and that the primary source was not the book On the Imitation of Christ, but the Bhagavad Gita.
Religious writer Eknat Eswaran compares the teachings of Thomas a Kempis with the Upanishads. And again he does not understand that it is necessary to compare the other way around. The Jesuits therefore called the book an imitation of Christ, because they understood the Christian origin of the Bhagavad Gita and the Upanishads. This is just an imitation of these books! And Thomas the imitator is a fictional face. And the book itself will be written in the 16th century, when the active struggle of the western part of Asia (Europe) against the Great Tartary begins, which will be headed by the Vatican, having created the religion of Catholicism for this.
In Russia, the Bhagavad Gita was re-learned in 1788, after N. I. Novikov published it, for the first time in Russian. It was perceived as some kind of incredible teaching, completely ancient, although today no one can even name the approximate century of its writing. Except for a few scientists and the author of this miniature, who told about the Indochinese campaign of the holy family and Tsarevich Iosaph (Buddha), a direct relative of Christ in the Roman dynasty of the rulers of the WHOLE WORLD. From which came the Russian tsars of the pre-Romanov period. Iosaph, who became the prototype of Buddha, passed on the teachings of Christ, since it was the secret of his family, that which was kept and protected in it by generations of the royal family. Therefore, both him and the Buddha can be considered another reflection of Christ in the evolutionary development of mankind. And to read the Bhagavad Gita as the ancient, little changed teachings of Jesus, preserved by a member of the Savior's family.
"Bhagavad Gita" is a truly unique phenomenon in world culture. The value of the Gita lies in its exceptional ability to influence the spiritual development of a person, which manifests itself in ethical, social and psychological aspects. Through the solution of the problem "Who am I?" The Gita gives the correct answer to the question "What to do?" and opens up ways to achieve a special inner state in which one can not only comprehend enduring spiritual values, but also put them into practice. The Gita gives a solution to the problems of the meaning of human existence, the clash of personal and universal ideas about morality. The teachings of the Gita affect the most diverse aspects of being, from the mundane, worldly, to the metaphysical, spiritual.
The Bhagavad Gita, or simply "Gita", is translated as "The Song of the Lord" - a monument of ancient Indian religious and philosophical thought in Sanskrit, part of the sixth book of the Mahabharata (Bhishmaparva, chapters 23-40), consists of 18 chapters and 700 verses. As you can see, the "position" of Jesus is openly named - the Lord, that is, an angel from the face of dominions, the heavenly angelic hierarchy.
I will now briefly try to explain in the usual language what is written on the jelly itself in the Bhagavad Gita and in the treatise “On the Imitation of Christ” and in general in the books of the Mahabharata and Ramayana.
Let's start with the fact that the famous arias, which are described in books, are none other than the Horde Cossacks, who came to Hindustan in the 14th century and created statehood there. The Indian Krishna is Jesus Christ, whose teaching these Horde brought to the Hindustan peninsula.
The books of the legend of Rama and the Malaya Ramayana tell just about this period of colonization. In general, in the Mahabharata there is a lot of evidence about the northern homeland of the Aryans-Cossacks-Horde.
Why were these Cossacks so far from home? Everything is simple if you know that the Great Kulikovo Battle of 1380 is described in the Indian epic, between the royal tribal Christians (Temnik Velyamin Mamaev) and the apostolic folk (Dmitry Donskoy). The apostolics won, and a new dynasty began to rule in Rus' from the younger branch of the old Roman dynasty of Byzantium. And those who supported the tribal Christians, he was forced to flee to the east, in search of new lands and subjects. With the remnants of Mamai's troops, the relatives of Christ, the rulers of the whole world, also left. It was they who brought the teachings of Jesus and knowledge to India.
The Kuru field (a bird-bird in India) is the Kulikovo field, and Arjuna (ar - arias, juna - father) is Dmitry Donskoy, while Duryojana (jana - mother) is Khan Mamai or mother's son, sissy. “Duryo” is most likely translated as a Russian fool: the eldest son is a pervak, the second son is a second, the third son is a third, and the fourth is a friend or fool. The smallest and mother's favorite. Obviously Mamai is the youngest offspring of the Romans.
The plot of the Indian epic is a tragic struggle between two related royal dynasties, the Pandavas and Kauravas, which tells about the events of the 14th century in Rus'. In light of this, it would be interesting to decipher the names of these dynasties, then much would fall into place with the legend of Rurik. So far, I see that the Pandavas are the Bears (panda-bear), and the Kauravas are possibly the Falcons-Ruriks, although the sivka-burka, the prophetic KAURKA, also just asks for the tongue. In any case, this is some kind of bird, since only birds are prophetic. For example, the symbol of Byzantium was the Phoenix bird. And in Rus', Gamayun is a bird. True, the horse is still prophetic. And the prototype of Christ is just Komnenos (room or komon, in Old Slavonic there is a horse) - that is, Konev (?). One of the symbols of Christ was the unicorn - a winged horse with a horn on its forehead.
I wrote a little about ornithology in the coats of arms of my ancestors, I see that this topic needs to be closely returned. To discover the true names of those who fought on the Kulikovo field means to find out which branch of the royal dynasty of the Romans went to Rus' in the 12th century. And what branch-dynasty, then they were overthrown in 1380 on the Kulikovo field. Here it either smacks of a papal bonfire, or the respect of descendants for the one who discovers this. I'll try and compete for posthumous glory. For now, I'll take note of what I've said.
In the legend about the battle on the Kuru field, the facts that preceded it are also given. So the attack on the sleepers in the Indian epic is the attack of the Horde on the Novgorodians on the Pyanaya River in 1377, three years before Kulikovo Field - the first war for religious beliefs in history.
In the Indian epic there are also large cannons invented by Sergius of Radonezh, shooting at the Kuru field, using gunpowder invented by him. They are described as war chariots spewing fire. The Battle of Kulikovo on the Kuru field was a battle for the adoption of Christianity as the official state religion on the territory of the entire vast “Mongolian” empire of the Slavs, who then conquered the whole world known to them and Byzantium.
What else can you read about in the Indian epic? Practically about the entire Bible: the flood and the voyage of Patriarch Noah-Manu, across the ocean in the 15th century, the biblical exodus of Moses, also of the 15th century, described in the book "Battle with clubs" and "The Great Exodus".
An attentive reader will surely find there a story about how Moses spewed water from a rock. Another well-known story about the attack of snakes was reflected on the pages of the Mahabharata, when Moses saved the people by making his snake out of copper. Here you can see the biblical story of Esther from the 16th century. Her name here is Susanna.
Evangelical plots are also clearly visible: the immaculate conception of the Indian god Yudhishthira (the distorted name Jesus Christ), the intrigues of King Herod against Christ and the flight of the family to Egypt, and then the return of Yudhishthira to Jerusalem, his scourging, the procession of the Hindu to Golgotha, prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane, ascension to heaven and even the identification of the Hindu as the Savior.
On the pages of the Indian epic one can clearly see the descent of Christ into hell, a lotus or a lily, as a sign of Mary the Mother of God, a Russian judgment about the right and left sides ... There is generally a solid Russian history, gentlemen, and anyone who wants to can be convinced of this, if at least once read this epic, which appeared in India in the 14-15 centuries.
I want to speak about the Veles book. Today it is almost the main book of neo-pagans. I have said many times that paganism in the modern sense has never existed in the world, and what is given out for it today is royal tribal and royal family Christianity. All these Svarogs, Veles, Peruns are just the names of the holy Christian saints of early royal Christianity. After the victory of apostolic Christianity, he had his own saints, and the old ones were forgotten, and remained in the legends of the forest Slavs. You ask why bowed to idols? So after all, the development of crafts and art did not allow doing otherwise. It is then that temples and wonderful creations of masters will appear, and at first a pillar and a temple dedicated to one of the early Christian saints. The times before the 9th century AD can be considered a tribal system, when a person did not yet know how to build large structures from stone. The chronology of mankind does not include even 10,000 years. Look at any calendar from the creation of the world. It is then that the clergy and canons will begin to lie, who is into what much, misrepresenting even Hollywood.
You ask me, were there civilizations before us? I don’t know, I work with documents and have never seen anything like this in more than 30 years of studying various materials. Frankly, I was also interested in the photos of giant people, which I gave for analysis to the Institute of Forensic Expertise. I gave there and photos of UFOs and other secret secrets. All this is photoshop. I can definitely show the place and time of making all sorts of sensations - the 19th century, the Vatican. The reason for this is also clear: let people be interested in all kinds of mysticism and miracles, without touching on the secrets of the Church, embroidered with white threads. Why white? So after all, falsification was carried out by people who are often not ready to give a definition to the phenomena that a modern fifth-grader understands. So they wrote what they could write, and what the imagination allowed. Today you know what a space rocket looks like. Could an Indian of the 14th century imagine it otherwise than as a balloon flying through the sky with a basket for people? And that was a phenomenon that struck the psyche.
Today people ask me, how can one explain the figurines of astronauts, aircraft and other equipment from ancient times? My friends, in my works on time, I have already explained that there is no time, but the past, present and future exist simultaneously. Things can fall from any cut to another, since the reality of the world and its laws operate only in the present, and then in a short time of an instant. And what has passed or will be has nothing to do with what is. The world is changing and the ability to be in the past or the future depends on knowing the laws of the moment where you want to go. If a thing falls into similar conditions, then it may well end up in the hands of King Lear, having come to him from the present time. So things end up in ancient burials, unless, of course, they are thrown there on purpose, which is much more common than real movements. The last exception to the rule, only confirming the rule itself. If you manage to create the conditions and physics of 1152 or 2500 around you and in yourself, you will find yourself in them, continuing to feel who you were at the beginning of the experiment.
You ask me, where does this data come from? From the legacy of the Cathars. I am familiar with their ideas about time, and even experiment with it. Today I live 43 seconds ahead of most of humanity and I know how to increase this interval. But I also know that there is absolutely no need to do this. But let me keep silent about the reasons, they will seem too incredible to you. And please don't think that Qatar is crazy, everything that I have said is the most ordinary physics, Niels Bohr's field theory, which the "Jewish genius" Einstein could not comprehend. Yes, he could not comprehend anything at all! Complete zero and physical weakness.
What do these 43 seconds give? Anticipation of a possible error in the study. This is the time my body needs to "come to terms with the thought." Some have it more, some have it less. This is the time when the physical processes of the body lag behind its spiritual component. That is, spirituality is pushed forward by me, as the vanguard, to the approaching events. People come to this shift in different ways, for example, through the comprehension of mastery, work, creativity. That is, when a specialist, having looked at an object, already imagines what can be done with it. Sometimes a shift occurs as a result of stress, negative experiences, vivid experiences, and finally love. This is how the gift of foresight or foolishness appears.
It is much worse when spirituality lags behind the body. Here comes the subjugation of backwardness, isolation, lack of will. How to achieve this? Yes, just to break a person in any way possible, when his "I" is suppressed and concerned only with the fate of the body. This is how madness occurs.
As you can see, I didn’t say anything supernatural, I didn’t tell you another thing, what practices can be used to achieve a shift. These practices were well known by our ancestors, and skillfully used them for good. This knowledge is not very safe, and therefore it is better to comprehend it in a natural way by developing spirituality. When you develop it, then there will be no need for time shifts, except for the sake of science.
An unkind person is also able to acquire this knowledge, but he will use it for his own purposes, which will always end badly for him.
Therefore, when reading letters from readers, I can clearly see who I am dealing with, even without seeing the person. Exactly 43 seconds later, a hint will follow about the expediency of developing this version and the dead end of this hypothesis. This I mean that having become familiar with the subject or proposal, you can predetermine its true value and decide whether it is worth doing it.
So I start working on the topic, asking if there is falsification in it. And then from one question to another, a logical chain is obtained, and the directories themselves are revealed on the desired page.
But back to the book of Welles. It definitely refers to the Indian epic and tells about the conquest of India by the Aryans in the 14th-15th centuries. Only this time it is a Russian retelling of the Indian heritage, which itself came out of the Russian heritage. That is why, I warn the reader about the dangers of neo-paganism. For the sake of curiosity, I have read many of the works of the authors of this plan, and I must note that they all follow the path that humanity has traveled. Creating first magic, then magical natural science, then dividing M.E. on religion and science, having created the Church, they again return to magic. I wrote about this in the work "Common Sense or the Mystery of the Homunculus Flask".
What I want to say in conclusion. If you look at Krishna, he has all the symbols and events of a suffering god. Krishna = Khris Na (Zaretyan), dying from a hunter's arrow (Longin's spear that killed Christ), numerous images of an Indian (it's just Jesus) in the form of a fish (Christian symbol), even a prediction that, after 36 years (Christ has 33) he will die a shameful death, all this and much more indicates that in the Indian epic we are dealing with ancient Christianity.
India, China, Tibet, Mongolia, etc. are not ancient states. They were formed by the Horde in the 14th century. Their phenomenon is that they, not being ancient countries, have preserved the culture and faith of ancient Rus', the cradle of all mankind, and if we talk about the value of these cultures for Russia, then you need to understand their uniqueness, understand their magnificent language of narration. Along with ancient Islam, which also preserved the retelling of early tribal Christianity, Buddhism and Hinduism preserved the truth about our past, which was carefully destroyed in the West, creating legends about the uniqueness of Catholicism. The words "Sic transit gloria mundi" which I found in the Bhagavad-gita belong to Krishna, that is, to Christ, and have exactly the same meaning as they are given in the treatise On the Imitation of Christ, have apparently been translated almost verbatim:
"Oh, how soon worldly glory passes."
They were said by the emperor of Byzantium Andronicus Komnenos, after he was arrested and betrayed. Something similar can be read in the "Chronicles" of Nikita Choniates, who described Satan by order of the Angel Isaac, by whose order the deposed emperor was crucified.
The reader may ask the question:
- You know a lot, Qatar, you understand a lot. Do you feel happy?
You know, I recently began to feel immortal and the feeling of this betrays confidence that despite the diversity of the Universe, the infinity of its secrets, the road to searching for the Great Plan of the Almighty is open to me. Three conditions for this are defined in terms of faith, hope, love. With their harmony, sophia or wisdom will come. You can draw wisdom everywhere, the Almighty poured it into wide oceans, seas, rivers of knowledge. Earthly life is too short to understand even a small part of the Hagia Sophia of our Heavenly Father. This life is only a prelude to what will unfold further, when, having passed the earthly trials, the angel deceived by Satanail - my soul will come to the threshold of its Father, having gone through many reincarnations until it is completely cleansed. This life is a big school, a university before entering the grandiose construction of the universe, where everyone can find a job to their liking, because to be God's helpers, to work alongside the father and comprehend his skill, the greatest trust on his part. That is why, I think that the most important happiness is not here, despite the fact that it can be experienced on Earth, for example, by making a scientific discovery, or by raising your child as a worthy person. I don't rush things, let things take their course, I just want to look a little further, developing these abilities in myself. Perhaps there are people who have lived a brighter life than mine, but I do not want to change anything in my life, from what has already happened or what will happen. After all, everything that is not done is done by myself and this is my path to God. This is not the position of a leaf picked up by the current, thank God, I am still a fighter and my brothers-in-arms are witnesses to this. This is the position of an attentive observer who knows the taste of victory and the joy of insight. And thanks to the teachings of Christ that led me to these thoughts.
Officer romance "Cat"
The cat cried a long journey to me,
He prophesied the devil of cold, anxiety,
On the shoulder strap, the trench lay down with an empty gap
And fate aims a pistol at the forehead.
Suddenly, the blood of a wounded bird began to clog,
Flowed on the eyebrow in a befuddled stream,
A warm wave rolled down the cheek,
And the earth was drunk with living blood.
The cat of happiness purred with boxes,
If you're lucky, even with bins.
Only blood shamelessly drips on your feet,
You can see the tablecloths of the road.
Sharp arrow, sweet poison of death,
The well-trodden path was directed by the devils,
They chose me to meet with a bullet,
How beautiful life is, not the sunset of the day.
Yellow-eyed cat, black fur coat,
The devil purred all the devil's fun.
Angel, where did you fly, where is my keeper?!
Apparently lost in my destiny.
The novel was written at the end of 1986 in Afghanistan.
This is how the glory of the world passes
This is how the glory of the world passes
From Latin: Sic transit gloria mundi (sic transit gloria mundi).
A phrase from the rite of enthronement (elevation to the dignity) of the Pope. Around 1409, a custom was introduced into this rite: at the moment the solemn procession of the highest church hierarchs of the Roman Catholic Church entered St. Peter's Cathedral, where the enthronement took place, a bunch of tow was burned on a staff three times before the future Pope and they said at the same time: “Holy father! This is how worldly glory passes.
But this phrase became popular thanks to the book “The Imitation of Christ” (1427) by the medieval theologian Thomas of Kempis (1379-1471). There is an expression: “Oh, how quickly the glory of the world passes!” Since 1616, the book has gone through more than two thousand editions in different languages, which greatly contributed to the popularity of this expression among many peoples.
Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions. - M.: "Lokid-Press". Vadim Serov. 2003 .
See what "Thus passes worldly glory" in other dictionaries:
Sic transit gloria mundi lat. This is how worldly glory passes. The expression is a slight alteration of the text from the book of the German mystic philosopher Thomas of Kempis (XV century) “On the Imitation of Christ” (I, 3, 6): “Oh, how soon it passes ... ... Wikipedia
Wikiquote has a page related to Latin proverbs In many languages of the world, including ... Wikipedia
Wikipedia has articles about other people with that surname, see Protopopov. Alexander Dmitrievich Protopopov ... Wikipedia
Wikipedia has articles about other people with that surname, see Shakhovskoy. Vsevolod Nikolaevich Shakhovskoy Minister of Trade and Industry Date of birth: September 12, 1874 (1874 09 12) ... Wikipedia
Prince, Minister of Trade and Industry Date of birth: September 12, 1874 Place of birth: Date of death: 1954 All ... Wikipedia
Vsevolod Nikolaevich Shakhovskoy Prince, Minister of Trade and Industry Date of birth: September 12, 1874 Place of birth: Date of death: 1954 All ... Wikipedia
Vsevolod Nikolaevich Shakhovskoy Prince, Minister of Trade and Industry Date of birth: September 12, 1874 Place of birth: Date of death: 1954 Vsev ... Wikipedia Orthodox Encyclopedia
This is how the glory of the world passes(meaning) - nothing is permanent.
The expression is a translation into Russian of the Latin expression - Sic transit gloria mundi.
An expression from a phrase from the book of the German mystic philosopher Thomas of Kempis (XV century) "" (I, 3, 6): "Oh, how soon worldly glory passes" (O quam cito transit gloria mundi). These words sound like an exclamation during the inauguration ceremony of the new pope, in front of whom a piece of cloth is burned three times - as a sign that everything earthly, including the power and glory he receives, is illusory, changeable and perishable.
The expression is also used in English - sic transit gloria mundi (Thus passes the glory of the world). It is listed in the American Heritage Dictionary of Idioms by Christine Ammer, 1992, which notes that the expression has been used in English since 1600. It is often used in an abbreviated form - sic transit.
Examples
(1860 - 1904)
"" (1886): "Passing through the entrance, I looked at the coffin and Milutikh read.
« Sic transit"(note - the beginning of the Latin saying: Sic transit gloria mundi (Thus passes worldly glory)), I thought."
"The Night Before the Court" (1884): "Finally, I was sitting in the company of Fedya and Zinochka at the samovar; I had to write a prescription, and I composed it according to all the rules of medical science:
Rp. Sic transit 0.05
Gloria mundi 1.0
Aquae destillatae 0.1
Two hours later, a tablespoon.
Ms. Syolova.
Dr. Zaitsev."
The Zealot (1883): “A few scraps of paper lay near the angry director. Half an hour ago these scraps were “a few words in defense of the press”... Sic transit gloria mundi!"
(1828 - 1910)
"War and Peace" (1863 - 1869), vol. 2, part 2, ch. 4:
“Then the candles were lit again, they said that he needed to see the full light, and again they removed the bandage and more than ten voices suddenly said: sic transit gloria mundi. (this is how the glory of the world passes)"
