Why did Andrey Malakhov leave Channel One? Became known the reason for the dismissal of Andrei Malakhov from the first channel Why did Andrei Malakhov leave 1.

04.03.2020

The TV presenter is already waiting on "Russia 1" and in "House-2".

He is loved and hated with equal force - there are no indifferent to Malakhov. That is why the news that Andrei is leaving Channel One stirred up all viewers. Some are worried, others rejoice. And everyone wonders together: what happened and where will he appear now?

Malakhov's phone in the last week, probably, would have exploded from calls. But he deliberately turned it off. Andrew is on vacation. Doesn't respond to emails, doesn't comment on anything. The people are at a loss: is it possible to believe the news about his dismissal or is it another duck on the eve of the new TV season?

Information leaked to the people from the corridors of Ostankino, where it is vigorously discussed that Malakhov (certainly the main face of Channel One!) has no longer been the host of Let They Talk since September. And allegedly, casting is already in full swing in his place.

It seems like Dmitry Borisov from the Vremya program auditioned, and Alexander Smol came from Krasnoyarsk - the same “newsman” who became famous throughout the country, applauding local deputies who had gathered to double their salaries.

But, they say, the main contender for Malakhov's warm place is Dmitry Shepelev. On the sidelines of the television center, they gossip that it is he who is being pushed through by the new producer “Let them talk”, with whom Andrei seems to have had a conflict ...

IS IT ALL POLICY'S BLAME?

Malakhov's talk show has always had a lot of turnover: guest editors burned out under a crazy load and after a few months of work they quit with the words: "Never again!"

Malakhov, on the other hand, plowed for 15 years without a break. The program changed its name: “Big Wash”, “Five Evenings”, “Let They Talk” - and the presenter remained unchanged.

- "Let them talk" - this is the goose that lays golden eggs to Channel One. But I am an employee on a salary that does not depend on either the ratings or the number of hours worked, - Andrei recently said in an interview. - I am a convenient worker who is loyal, does not open doors with his foot and enjoys what he does. I saw people slamming doors and stamping their feet - and I know where they are now. This it concerns both favorites and favorites - everything ended very quickly ...

In May, suddenly there was a mass exodus of employees from his show. Many considered the reason that producer Natalya Nikonova returned to the program, who almost nine years ago went to competitors.

She brought her team. And I decided to add pepper to the "family squabbles" - political topics began to appear on the air. Only about the murdered deputy Denis Voronenkov and his widow Maria Maksakova were published several issues.

Malakhov, who called his show "modern Chekhov's stories" and highly valued the trust of the audience, was, to put it mildly, dissatisfied with the change in format.

Conflict began to brew in the team. And for the first time the word "dismissal" was heard. Whether of their own free will or “by agreement” is not so important ...

SHADOW OF SHEPELEV

And Andrei Malakhov is to blame for all the troubles, most likely ... Boris Korchevnikov, his main competitor from the Russia 1 TV channel.

In winter, he accepted an offer to become the head of the Orthodox TV channel Spas. Who will host “Live” instead of him, the producers of the show decided quickly - here is Shepelev without a job, his name is well-known, let's take him.

Dima happily announced his appointment on Instagram. But it never showed up on the screen. As they say, the producers showed initiative - they forgot to approve his candidacy from the channel's management. For which, it seems, they paid with work.

So Natalya Nikonova was first on the street. Then again in "Let them talk." And soon, tired of the strife with Malakhov, she again remembered Shepelev - why shouldn't they replace the obstinate Andrei?

Dmitry shows himself well in the new project “Actually”, does not lose face when the heroes turn to op and insults in the studio, does not go into his pocket for a word - there is a chance to make him a new star.

SEX WITH A PIG

Behind the eyes of Andrei Malakhov, TV bosses often call "Our Yuri Gagarin" - for a sincere smile and the ability to humanize the most scandalously fried topic. The host, who for so many years has not forgotten how to empathize with the heroes, is worth its weight in gold. And if there really was a dismissal from the First, there would be no job left.

"Dom-2" wants to get him on the perimeter, and on "Russia 1", according to rumors, Malakhov has already made an offer that is difficult to refuse. But the channel's response to official requests is vague. “We have all the leadership on vacation, so this physically cannot happen at the moment,” the press service says.

Television critics don't believe in layoffs at all. They think that the whole story is an exaggerated PR. “It's like suggesting that Putin will go to work in the Moscow mayor's office,” they laugh.

Meanwhile, in an interview just two months ago, Malakhov very clearly outlined the one and only reason that could make him leave the First: “Only if they made me fuck a pig live to increase my ratings” ...

August 1, 2017, 12:07

This program most clearly demonstrates to us that, it turns out, putting up for sale someone else's pain, tears, misfortune, digging in dirty linen in full view of the whole country without any moral right today is called the simple word "format". Or rather, a format that brings in good money. The degree of cynicism simply does not fit in my head .. What do you want ?! Of course it will be in demand! Toilet paper, for example, will always be in greater demand than Dostoyevsky's manuscripts! And stupid reality shows, in which participants endlessly sort things out and sleep with everyone in a row, will a priori have a higher rating than Tarkovsky's film.

Alexey Serebryakov

For almost a day now, the Internet has been boiling with reports that the country's main TV channel, the First Channel, will soon be left without a face, or rather, without its most famous presenter, Andrei Malakhov. Since Malakhov goes to work for the All-Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company - according to some sources, due to a conflict with the team of the talk show "Let them talk", according to others - due to the return to Channel One of Dmitry Shepelev, the ex-husband of the deceased singer Zhanna Friske, who allegedly occupied Malakhov's studio

The first more or less intelligible and informative explanation appeared why Malakhov nevertheless left Channel One.

The story of events from one of the employees of Russia 1 (you can’t quote directly, so it’s very short):

Malakhov is dragged to Russia 1 out of a sense of revenge.

Recently, producer Rossiya 1 Natalia Nikonova left for Channel One.

And so, she developed a stormy activity, decided to lead the Malakhov program, at the same time offering the leadership ideas for new projects, including the recently launched Dmitry Shepelev show.

And Malakhov did not like it.

He has been leading "Let them talk" for many years and believes that he does not need a boss. And for "Russia 1" his candidacy is very beneficial: the ratings of "Let them talk" have always been higher than those of "Live". And who will miss the opportunity to beautifully wipe the nose of both Nikonova and Channel One in general. And just like that, he was offered better terms.

Natalya Nikonova, twice winner of TEFI-2007, was the head of the Channel One Special Projects Studio, without any irony the founding mother of the Russian talk show genre for housewives.

At one time, it was Nikonova who launched Andrey Malakhov's show “Let them talk”, “Malakhov +”, “Lolita. Without complexes”, “Judge for yourself”, etc.


Judging by the leaked information, Natalya Nikonova left Russia 1 after a financial audit.


Alexander MITROSHENKOV, president of the Transcontinental Media Company, which includes the New Company, the producer of this program, discovered financial irregularities. As it turned out, the host Dmitry SHEPELEV was paid a salary for six months, but he never went on the air. When Boris Korchevnikov was looking for a replacement, Shepelev's candidacy was proposed, as you and I remember.

Shepelev never went on the air on Rossiya 1, the talk show was still hosted by Korchevnikov, but for more than six months Dmitry received money for nothing.

When the results of the financial audit were reported to Mitroshenkov, he suggested that the leaders of "Live" Nikonova and Petritskaya resign.

Natalya Nikonova and Marina Petritskaya once came to the "Live" from Channel One.

They managed the show for several years: they decided creative and financial issues, which topics to air, which of the participants how much to pay.

These are the passions we have on television.

What Malakhov can bargain about, the Metodichka telegram channel reports: “The real reason for Malakhov’s departure to the All-Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company is that for several years he asked Ernst to allow him to produce his own programs. But Konstantin Lvovich sent him to ..., motivating the refusal by the fact that "I made you a TV star - you will earn your own on corporate parties."

Well, a completely fantastic version, however, which has the right to exist, that no departure was planned, and all the noise was created deliberately in order to inflate ratings in the dead summer season. Not in favor of the version is the fact that Channel One has not yet played such dirty games.

With the departure of Malakhov, the First would have lost a lot. Malakhov is the key media face of the channel, the goose that lays the golden eggs of the rating, with all the immoral distortions of his talk show, is the best in its genre. Dmitry Shepelev, who, although younger, is also quite a professional, as they say, has lower charisma. Pug vs elephant.

The aesthetics of scandalous shows promoted by producer Natalya Nikonova is somewhat traditional: endless Alexei Panin, DNA tests, white thread production, etc., without too much reflection.

At the same time, Malakhov in recent years, despite the fact that he works in an identical vein, is drawn to journalistic generalizations and monologues full of morality. Probably, the conflict, if only there was one, really originated somewhere here. They tried to cut off the wings of an artist who claims to be a demiurge and put him in a cage; the leadership did not listen and ... The drama came out quite in line with the talk show "Let them talk."

Don't switch.

Take care of yourself and your loved ones.

The issue was never aired, and Ernst threw me out from the first. But I still publish this program in an abridged version and in text. The main meaning of the transmission is conveyed correctly.

Why do pharmacies offer outdated and dangerous drugs, while hiding from people the truth about the new drug from the Research Institute of Rheumatology named after. V.A. Nasonova, which is distributed at the expense of the research institute budget. How is it that the pharmacy mafia makes hundreds of millions for the health of people, ruining their eyesight?

For a conversation, we invited the chief specialist of the research institute, Lyudmila Antonova, to the studio.

Andrei Malakhov: “Lyudmila Viktorovna, how do you assess the situation with the danger of diseases associated with vision?”

Ludmila Antonova : Many people think that poor eyesight is not a very dangerous type of disease, which threatens only to lose part of the image. This is a fundamentally wrong opinion. Poor and fuzzy vision with age or with pathology is extremely dangerous and even at an early stage of development, it can kill a person and make him blind. Firstly, any vision disease is a precancerous disease. Even at an early stage, conjunctivitis can lead to the formation of a cancerous tumor. Most often it is cancer of the bone marrow or blood cancer. Both are extremely difficult to treat and fatal. This is perhaps the most underestimated complication in its danger that occurs in people with sick and poor eyesight. Secondly Blurred vision often causes a person to go completely blind. Suddenly one of the eyes stopped seeing, far images or near ones are not visible - this is a very common complication that occurs in many patients. Going blind dooms the patient, in fact, to existence as a "reasonable vegetable." Which is not much different from death. Third, a banal decrease in visual acuity can "close" completely vision and cause complications of any organ - from the liver to the heart. The brain is the backbone of the central nervous system. And with its violations, there are malfunctions in the work of internal organs, which can lead to a wide variety of complications.

Andrey Malakhov: “So everyone who has poor and blurry vision is in danger?”

Ludmila Antonova : Among specialists, eye diseases are considered one of the most dangerous. Unlike many other diseases that occur in humans, they do not lead to some temporary health problems, but develop only on an increasing basis, gradually leading a person to the grave.

Eye diseases are the cause of millions of people with blindness. It's like a time bomb that doesn't necessarily go off right away, but has a 100% chance of going off sooner or later. In addition, the situation with poor vision is such that in the first stage the patient cannot distinguish the disease from the usual symptoms that come with age. He realizes the problem when the disease has already gone through the body and it is essentially too late to treat it.

Every year in Russia, hundreds of thousands of people go blind from reduced visual acuity, provoked precisely by diseases with age. Each of them suffers terribly. Patients over 40 years of age are at particular risk.

The worst thing is that until recently there was no effective way to prevent the onset of blindness. If a person had a disease in the middle or severe stage, then the maximum that medicine could offer him was drugs that relieve symptoms. No more.

Andrey Malakhov: “How are vision-related diseases treated now? "

Ludmila Antonova : In most cases, patients are offered treatment with chondoprotectors and other drugs, which, with the best result, can slow down the development of a particular disease, nothing more. In some cases, people are treated with injections or surgery.

The first option (chondoprotectors and other pills) is essentially useless. The second and third are extremely dangerous. Injections can only remove pain and slightly increase clarity, while in no way affecting the disease itself.

As a result, a person will begin to see better by 15 percent and believe that everything is in order, while a disease of the retina can already develop in the body. And operations on the retina in general very often end in disability or other serious complications. They are shown to be carried out only in the most extreme cases.

It is precisely because of the low efficiency of the classical approach to treatment that the minds of specialists have always been occupied with the development of a drug that can really treat vision and restore people to health. At the Research Institute named after V.A. Nasonova, we have created the first of its kind medicine that can really restore vision.

Andrey Malakhov: “Can you tell us about him?”

Ludmila Antonova : Certainly. This is Optivision, a unique drug that has no analogues both abroad and in Russia.

At the moment, Optivision has passed clinical trials and showed extremely high rates of effectiveness. It helps even in advanced and severe cases, restoring vision and returning it to a healthy state. According to its performance, the medicine is unique. No other drug is able to effectively restore poor vision, returning a person to a completely healthy state.

In addition to Russia, he successfully completed clinical trials in Switzerland and the USA. But until we provide them with the entire population of Russia, it will be available only within the country.

Andrey Malakhov: “How did it happen that such a drug is not allowed in pharmacies? "

Ludmila Antonova : The fact is that the scientific research institute is not engaged in commercial activities. AND we do not sell the drug, but distribute it for a purely symbolic price, within the framework of a special program. This is precisely the main conflict with pharmacy chains. They want to make money on sick people, squeezing the maximum out of them, even old and ineffective medicines, such as Blueberry Forte, are ideal for this. While our drug not only solves the problem forever, it is also distributed virtually free of charge.

However, we found a way out - the specialists of the research institute created a special website where you can leave an application for "Optivision" and get it. All you need to do is just leave your name and contact details. After that, you will be contacted to clarify a convenient delivery time. We tried to make everything as simple as possible so that everyone can get a medicine, even if they have not ordered anything via the Internet before.

Andrey Malakhov: “In addition to you, Viktor Sedelnikov, the chief oculist of Russia, is present in the studio today. A question for you, Viktor Fedorovich - why does it happen that a unique medicine created in Russia and distributed at such a price does not reach the population?

Viktor Sedelnikov : Andrei, I want to note that despite the position, the chief ophthalmologist is mainly involved in the coordination of scientific research and strategic issues. I have no influence on commercial pharmacy chains. All I can do is recommend some drug to them.

Of course, "Optivision" was recommended from my side. Actually, the entire scientific community understands what a colossal breakthrough in the field of vision treatment has been made. To my deep regret, pharmacy chains did not react in any way. Which is generally understandable and logical, since in the event of a mass distribution of the drug, they will suffer multimillion-dollar losses.

We are currently working on distributing Optivision through public clinics and hospitals. There are indeed bureaucratic problems, but I hope that the issue will be resolved within the next 10-12 months.

Andrey Malakhov: “It turns out that at least another year will pass before the appearance of Optivision in clinics. What should people do until he appears at the doctors? "

Viktor Sedelnikov : The research institute has an official website of the project, where everyone can leave an application and get "Optivision drops". For now, the only way out is to use it. Moreover, as far as I understand, they deliver the drug very quickly and are able to cover any number of people.

Ludmila Antonova : A small note about "any number of people." At this point in time, the research institutes do not have enough production volumes to cover the entire country. Therefore, we alternately hold promotions in different regions of the Russian Federation. At the current time, the drug can be obtained not only in the city of Moscow, but throughout Russia. The program will run until November 25, 2018.

Andrey Malakhov: “What can you say goodbye to our viewers? "

Ludmila Antonova : I want to draw the readers' attention to the fact that vision and retinal diseases are "getting younger", as many began to spend their time at the monitor and on the phone. You don't have to wait until bone marrow cancer appears or visual acuity drops and you just wait for your blindness.

Important! It was concluded that October and November is the best time to start treatment for eye diseases. Due to the stabilization of the average temperature, the metabolism is accelerated, the blood circulation in the body increases, the flow of blood and oxygen to the internal organs increases, the effect of the use of the drug increases. Healing from blurred vision, as well as related diseases, is 67% faster than it would be at other times of the year. Restoration of body functions occurs at 100% during the entire course of treatment.

The famous Russian TV presenter Andrey Malakhov finally confirmed his transition from Channel One to the Russia 1 TV channel. At his new place of work, he will host the “Live Broadcast” program, while for many years he has been the permanent host of the “Let them talk” project.

Malakhov posted on the website of his StarHit magazine an open appeal to the CEO of Channel One, Konstantin Ernst.

TV presenter Andrey Malakhov wrote an open letter to Konstantin Ernst and all the staff of Channel One, in which he said goodbye to his colleagues with whom he had worked for a long 25 years.

Andrey Malakhov 08/23/2017: where did he leave Channel 1

“In our digital era, the epistolary genre is rarely addressed, but I came to Channel One in the last century, when people were still writing letters to each other, not text messages. So sorry for such a long message. I dare to hope you know the true reasons for my unexpected transfer to Rossiya 1, where I will host the new program Andrei Malakhov. Live”, to engage in a Saturday show and other projects, ”the Starhit website quotes the text of the letter.

The host of “Let them talk” thanked his colleagues for their kind attitude and support, remembered by name those who treated him better than others, noting the professionalism of the channel’s team, and wished success to his successor, Dmitry Borisov.

23:49:13 - 188.170.72.84 - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/60.0.3112.101 Safari/537.36 - http://c-ib.ru/ else/74836.html

“Dima, all hope is on you! The other day I saw fragments of "Let them talk" with your participation. I’m sure you will succeed!” Malakhov wrote.

Now the ex-leader of the “Let them talk” program expressed gratitude to the employees and Ernst for the years of work spent side by side. According to Malakhov, years of cooperation with Channel One have become "part of his DNA." The presenter is grateful to Ernst for the experience and "an amazing journey through the TV road of life."

The departure of Andrei Malakhov from Channel One became one of the most discussed news in the summer of 2017. Even before the appearance of official comments, many experts associated this with changes in the TV presenter's personal life, namely, with the expected birth of an heir.

Andrey Malakhov decided to beat all this in a video that he published on his Instagram page. According to the plot, the TV presenter is examined by a doctor in the maternity hospital, but complains about the equipment: “Solid noises and nothing is visible”, after which he decides to “change the channel”. “You don’t have your first one, do you? ”, - the specialist is interested in Malakhov. “Not anymore,” he confirms. The video turns out to be a promotional video for the new season of the program "Live" on the TV channel "Russia", which will be hosted by Andrey Malakhov in the new season.

And in an interview with his wife Natalya's website wday.ru, he frankly told why he left Channel One. Andrey Malakhov admitted: after he turned 45, he realized that "it's time to get out of the tight framework."

“I have always been subordinate. A human soldier following orders. But I wanted independence,” said the “king of ratings”.

An additional "blow", the presenter admitted, was the transfer of the "Let them talk" program from Ostankino, where Malakhov and his team spent a quarter of a century, to another studio.

Therefore, he agreed when he received a call from Rossiya 1 and was offered to become a producer of his own program in order to "decide for yourself what to do and what topics to cover."

In addition, the presenter announced the name of his new program: “Andrey Malakhov. Live".



Similar articles