The heroes of Lermontov and Turgenev - Grigory Alexandrovich Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov - people belonging to one social group but living in different time. After the massacre of the Decembrists in 1825, the time came for a generation about which M. Yu. Lermontov wrote: “... in the face of danger, shamefully cowardly and before the authorities, contemptible slaves ...” This is not said about all young and mature - about Pechorin, one can should be spoken of as an extraordinary personality, as a very interesting person. This is how M. Yu. Lermontov shows him when he paints an unusual portrait of Pechorin, talks about his actions (abduction of Bela, a duel with Grushnitsky), about friendship with Dr. Werner, about the only love Pechorin to Vera Lithuanian, about the desire of the hero to find his place in life. Pechorin may or may not like it, but one cannot remain indifferent to him. Someone the hero has his straightforwardness, and someone jars; some like his sincerity, while others see cruelty in it. Two or three episodes from the life of the hero M. Yu. Lermontov remain in the reader's memory as an example of the honesty, decency of the hero, for example, an explanation with Princess Mary, and a duel with Grushnitsky, when Pechorin gives a person a chance to admit his mistakes and avoid a duel. But in the scene of farewell to Maxim Maksimych - cold, cruel - it seems that no one likes Pechorin, and rightly so.
There is essentially nothing to say about Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov ... Posture - this is very briefly about his behavior. But there are moments that deserve the attention of the reader. In a dispute with Bazarov, Pavel Petrovich is right, arguing that life with its ready-made, historically grown forms can be smarter individual person or groups of people. Pavel Petrovich reproaches Bazarov for contempt for the people, the nihilist parries the reproach: “Well, if he deserves contempt!” Kirsanov talks about Schiller and Goethe, Bazarov exclaims: "A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet!" etc. But if Pavel Petrovich comes to belittle human personality before the principles taken for granted, then Bazarov asserts his own personality at the cost of destroying authorities.
The youth of Pavel Petrovich passed in the 1830s in an atmosphere of dull reaction, mature years coincided with the period of the "Gloomy Seven Years". He fails to understand the demands new era, views younger generation deeply alien to him. As Turgenev wrote: “Look into the faces of the “fathers” - weakness and lethargy or narrow-mindedness.” Pavel Petrovich considers himself a liberal and a lover of progress. He talks a lot about the public good, but Bazarov is right when he tells him: “... you respect yourself and sit back; what is the use of this? All the principles of Pavel Petrovich come down to one thing: to defend the old order.
Do these people, Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich, have anything in common? What allowed D. I. Pisarev to compare Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov with Pechorin " small size"? First of all, I think, character traits: selfishness, self-conceit, indisputability in judgments, manner of dressing, staying in society ... In matters of principle, one should not, one simply cannot compare Pavel Petrovich with Pechorin. material from the site
At the end of the novel, I. S. Turgenev, having told about the stay of P. P. Kirsanov in Dresden, seems to put an end to such a comparison: “... between two and four hours, at the most fashionable time for a walk, you can meet a man about fifty ... elegantly dressed ... This is Pavel Petrovich. Here he gets to know more with the English and with visiting Russians, in conversation with whom he gives free rein to his bile ... He does not read anything Russian, but on his desk there is a silver ashtray in the form of a peasant's bast shoes. It's still noisy..."
That's all. In the preface to the novel A Hero of Our Time, M. Yu. Lermontov offered the reader the following observation: “The history of the human soul, even the smallest soul, is almost more curious and not more useful than history whole people." This can be attributed to Pechorin, but not to Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, he is not interesting to me. So judge: does the elder Kirsanov look like "little Pechorin"? No, of course not! With all due respect to the judgments of Dmitry Ivanovich Pisarev...
Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search
On this page, material on the topics:
- Pavel Petrovich Pechorin
- characteristics of pavel petrovich fathers and children
- what does pavel kirsanov think about himself
- kersanov and pechorin comparison
- biography of Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov
Is it possible to agree with the critic Pisarev's idea that Pavel Kirsanov is a hero of the Pechorin type?
The work of A.S. Pushkin's "Eugene Onegin" was completed in 1830. The time of the end of the novel by M.Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time" - 1841
Thus, the main characters of the works of Pushkin and Lermontov are separated in time by only ten years: Onegin is from the era of the twenties, Pechorin is the "hero ... of time" of the thirties.
In his article "Bazarov" literary critic DI. Pisarev notes in them the features of “superfluous people” who “did not fit” into the usual forms of life, did not find their calling, did not determine for themselves the main, genuine interest that could make up the meaning of their existence.
“At all times,” the critic writes, “people lived in the world, dissatisfied with life in general, or some forms of life in particular.
Onegin and Pechorin belong to the category of such people.
"... inactivity and vulgarity of life strangle Onegin." He cannot be satisfied with "what is so satisfied, so happy selfish mediocrity." (V. Belinsky. "Works of Alexander Pushkin".)
Namely, according to the critic Belinsky, “empty light” is the environment that ruined best qualities soul of Onegin.
Grigory Pechorin in the novel by M.Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time" is a contradictory nature. “Immense forces” did not manifest themselves in any way in the life of this man, gifted by nature. Therefore, the hero is unhappy, therefore "he is furiously chasing life, looking for it everywhere." Pechorin seeks to translate his "high purpose" into action, he is looking for true values in life. However, it turns out that his strength is being wasted, and the events and people he meets on the way are too simple and uncomplicated for him.
And what can make Pechorin's happiness?
He dreams of being "loved by everyone", but devoted, selfless, loving soul, as it seems to him, is not around. Grigory Alexandrovich is loved by Mary, Vera, Bela, Maxim Maksimych cherishes his friendship with him, but he quickly “unravels” them and loses interest in them. He himself "was carried away by the lures of empty and ungrateful passions."
Pechorin's nature is very deep. The time will come, and Pechorin, having survived passions and doubts, will become different - a person, strong in spirit, intelligent and resilient. This is the opinion of a critic of Belinsky.
Pavel Petrovich in the novel by I.S. Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons" cannot be called a hero of the Pechorin type, although in some ways these two people are similar. His upbringing, secularism, aristocratism, wealth give rise in him a sense of superiority over other people. He, in fact, the same age as Pechorin, also experiences the influence of his difficult time, the era of "timelessness". But Pechorin's throwing is unusual for him. He thinks he's irresistible. How socialite, a man of rare fate, he is sure that his luck, success in his career are given to him by right.
Unhappy love broke him, took him from him best years life.
At the same time, Pavel Petrovich was always a narcissistic person, and it was more important for him to seem than to be.
Pechorin, with his ardent disposition and desire to “fool” (Pisarev’s expression), is a person much more sincere and open to people than Kirsanov.
Pechorin's criticism evaluates it as " extra person”, experiencing a conflict with its time, environment.
The heroes of Lermontov and Turgenev - Grigory Alexandrovich Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov - people belonging to the same social group, but living at different times. After the massacre of the Decembrists in 1825, the time came for a generation about which M. Yu. Lermontov wrote: “... in the face of danger shamefully cowardly and in front of power contemptible slaves ...” This is not said about all young and mature - Pechorin can and should be spoken of as extraordinary personality, as a very interesting person. This is how M. Yu. Lermontov shows him when he paints an unusual portrait of Pechorin, talks about his actions, about friendship with Dr. Werner, about Pechorin’s only love for Vera Lithuanian, about the hero’s desire to find his place in life. Pechorin may or may not like it, but one cannot remain indifferent to him. Someone the hero has his straightforwardness, and someone jars; some like his sincerity, while others see cruelty in it. Two or three episodes from the life of the hero M. Yu. Lermontov remain in the reader's memory as an example of the honesty, decency of the hero, for example, an explanation with Princess Mary, and a duel with Grushnitsky, when Pechorin gives a person a chance to admit his mistakes and avoid a duel. But in the scene of farewell to Maxim Maksimych - cold, cruel - it seems that no one likes Pechorin, and rightly so.
There is essentially nothing to say about Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov ... Posture - this is very briefly about his behavior. But there are moments that deserve the attention of the reader. In a dispute with Bazarov, Pavel Petrovich is right, arguing that life with its ready-made, historically grown forms can be smarter than an individual person or group of people. Pavel Petrovich reproaches Bazarov with contempt for the people, the nihilist parries the reproach: “Well, if he deserves contempt!” Kirsanov talks about Schiller and Goethe, Bazarov exclaims: “A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet!” etc. But if Pavel Petrovich comes to belittling the human personality in front of principles taken for granted, then Bazarov asserts his own personality at the cost of destroying authorities.
The youth of Pavel Petrovich passed in the 1830s in an atmosphere of dull reaction, and his mature years coincided with the period of the “gloomy seven years”. He is unable to understand the requirements of the new era, the views of the younger generation are deeply alien to him. As Turgenev wrote: "Look into the faces of the" fathers "- weakness and lethargy or narrow-mindedness." Pavel Petrovich considers himself a liberal and a lover of progress. He talks a lot about the public good, but Bazarov is right when he tells him: “... you respect yourself and sit back; what is the use of this?” All the principles of Pavel Petrovich come down to one thing: to defend the old order.
Do these people have something in common - Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich? What allowed D. I. Pisarev to compare Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov with Pechorin of “small size”? First of all, I think, character traits: selfishness, self-conceit, indisputability in judgments, manner of dressing, staying in society ... In matters of principle, one should not, one simply cannot compare Pavel Petrovich with Pechorin.
At the end of the novel, I. S. Turgenev, speaking about P. P. Kirsanov’s stay in Dresden, seems to put an end to such a comparison: “... between two and four hours, at the most fashionable time for a walk, you can meet a person about fifty years old ... elegantly dressed ... This is Pavel Petrovich. Here he knows more with the British and with the visiting Russians, in conversation with whom he gives free rein to his bile ... He does not read anything Russian, but on his desk there is a silver ashtray in the form of a peasant's bast shoes. It's still noisy…”
That's all. In the preface to the novel A Hero of Our Time, M. Yu. Lermontov offered the reader the following observation: “The history of the human soul, even the smallest soul, is almost more curious and more useful than the history of a whole people.” This can be attributed to Pechorin, but not to Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, he is not interesting to me. So judge: does the elder Kirsanov look like “little Pechorin”? No, of course not! With all due respect to the judgments of Dmitry Ivanovich Pisarev...
(No Ratings Yet)
- “This book has recently experienced the unfortunate gullibility of some readers and even magazines ... Others were terribly offended ... that they were given as an example such an immoral person ...
- 1 “What, Peter? Can’t you see it yet?” asked on May 20, 1859, going out on the low porch of the inn without a hat ... a gentleman in his early forties, ...
- About the hero: the public took him with irritation. Some because they are given such an immoral person as an example, others because the author allegedly drew his own not ...
- M. Yu. Lermontov worked on the novel “A Hero of Our Time” in 1838-1840. Its idea was born during the writer's exile to the Caucasus in 1838....
- In any book, the preface is the first and at the same time the last thing; it either serves as an explanation of the purpose of the essay, or as a justification and answer to criticism. But...
- I Nikolai Petrovich Kirsanov, sitting on the porch, awaits the arrival of his son Arkady at the inn. Nikolai Petrovich owned the estate, his father was a military general, and he ...
- The most remarkable works of Russian literature of the 19th century are distinguished by the formulation of the most important social, philosophical, and ethical questions of their time. The richness of the problematics is one of the main qualities characteristic of ...
- Bela The author travels from Tiflis on a chaise longue and on the way meets Staff Captain Maksim Maksimych. The men stop in the village to spend the night, and between them...
- The material of the article is taken from the book by B. I. Turyanskaya and L. N. Gorokhovskaya “Russian literature XIX B. Materials for preparing for exams "M.," Russian word”. 2002....
- Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" was written in 1861. He was immediately destined to become a symbol of the era. The author especially clearly expressed the problem of the relationship between the two ...
- Option 1 A wonderful gift to see and feel what is happening in Russian public life possessed by I. S. Turgenev. Your understanding of the brewing main public conflict 60s XIX... Sadly, I look at our generation! His future is either empty or dark, Meanwhile, under the burden of knowledge and doubt, It will grow old in inaction. M....
- Valentin Rasputin was born on March 15, 1937 in the Irkutsk region, in the village of Ust-Uda. Nature, which became close in childhood, will come to life and speak in books. In big...
The heroes of Lermontov and Turgenev - Grigory Alexandrovich Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov - people belonging to the same social group, but living at different times. After the massacre of the Decembrists in 1825, the time came for a generation about which M. Yu. Lermontov wrote: “... in the face of danger, shamefully cowardly and before the authorities, contemptible slaves ...” This is not said about all young and mature - about Pechorin, one can one should speak as an extraordinary person, as a very interesting person. This is how M. Yu. Lermontov shows him when he paints an unusual portrait of Pechorin, talks about his actions (the abduction of Bela, a duel with Grushnitsky), about friendship with Dr. Werner, about Pechorin’s only love for Vera Lithuanian, about the hero’s desire to find his place in life . Pechorin may or may not like it, but one cannot remain indifferent to him. Someone the hero has his straightforwardness, and someone jars; some like his sincerity, while others see cruelty in it. Two or three episodes from the life of the hero M. Yu. Lermontov remain in the reader's memory as an example of the honesty, decency of the hero, for example, an explanation with Princess Mary, and a duel with Grushnitsky, when Pechorin gives a person a chance to admit his mistakes and avoid a duel. But in the scene of farewell to Maxim Maksimych - cold, cruel - it seems that no one likes Pechorin, and rightly so. There is essentially nothing to say about Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov ... Posture - this is very briefly about his behavior. But there are moments that deserve the attention of the reader. In a dispute with Bazarov, Pavel Petrovich is right, arguing that life with its ready-made, historically grown forms can be smarter than an individual person or group of people. Pavel Petrovich reproaches Bazarov for contempt for the people, the nihilist parries the reproach: “Well, if he deserves contempt!” Kirsanov talks about Schiller and Goethe, Bazarov exclaims: "A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet!" etc. But if Pavel Petrovich comes to belittling the human personality in front of principles taken for granted, then Bazarov asserts his own personality at the cost of destroying authorities. The youth of Pavel Petrovich passed in the 1830s in an atmosphere of deaf reaction, his mature years coincided with the period of the “gloomy seven years”. He is unable to understand the requirements of the new era, the views of the younger generation are deeply alien to him. As Turgenev wrote: “Look into the faces of the “fathers” - weakness and lethargy or narrow-mindedness.” Pavel Petrovich considers himself a liberal and a lover of progress. He talks a lot about the public good, but Bazarov is right when he says to him: “. ..you respect yourself and sit back; what is the use of this? All the principles of Pavel Petrovich come down to one thing: to defend the old order.
Do these people, Pechorin and Pavel Petrovich, have anything in common? What allowed D. I. Pisarev to compare Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov with Pechorin of “small size”? First of all, I think, character traits: selfishness, self-conceit, indisputability in judgments, manner of dressing, staying in society ... In matters of principle, one should not, one simply cannot compare Pavel Petrovich with Pechorin. At the end of the novel, I. S. Turgenev, having told about the stay of P. P. Kirsanov in Dresden, seems to put an end to such a comparison: “... between two and four hours, at the most fashionable time for a walk, you can meet a man about fifty ... elegantly dressed ... This is Pavel Petrovich. Here he gets to know more with the English and with visiting Russians, in conversation with whom he gives free rein to his bile ... He does not read anything Russian, but on his desk there is a silver ashtray in the form of a peasant's bast shoes. He's still making noise...' That's it. In the preface to the novel A Hero of Our Time, M. Yu. Lermontov offered the reader the following observation: “The history of the human soul, even the smallest soul, is almost more curious and more useful than the history of a whole people.” This can be attributed to Pechorin, but not to Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, he is not interesting to me. So judge: does the elder Kirsanov look like "little Pechorin"? No, of course not! With all due respect to the judgments of Dmitry Ivanovich Pisarev...
Like, praise, tweet, etc.
