Frost's antipode - Pavel Mechik. In the novel, he is an "anti-hero". This is a young boy who joined the detachment only out of curiosity. But he immediately became disillusioned with the ideas, for the sake of which he "ceased" to be an urban intellectual. But the Sword hid it from everyone. The people who surrounded Paul brought him many disappointments, because they turned out to be incompatible with the “ideal” heroes that the ardent youthful imagination created them. still weak, because in the further narrative he betrays the members of the detachment. The sword was put on patrol by Levinson, the head of the detachment, but Pavel considered this not true and, having not fulfilled his duty, disappeared into the forest, which led to the death of the detachment. “... The swordsman, who had already driven quite far, looked back: Frost was riding behind him. Then the detachment and Morozka disappeared around the corner ... He dozed off. He did not understand why he had been sent ahead. He threw up his head, and the sleepy state instantly left him, replaced by a feeling of incomparable animal horror: there were Cossacks on the road ... "
The sword disappeared and saved only his own life, putting the lives of the squad members on the map. Fadeev focuses not on the battles themselves, but on the time between us, when there comes a moment of respite, rest. These seemingly “peaceful” episodes are full of internal tension and conflict: whether it’s the case of killing fish, confiscating pork from a Korean, or waiting for the result of Metelitsa reconnaissance. Such a construction is deep meaning narratives: moral, ideological and political problems and their philosophical understanding are important. The train of thought of the characters, their behavior, internal throwing in relation to everything that happens around - this is what Fadeev called "the selection of human material."
In this regard, the image of Frost, one of the heroes of the novel, is interesting. Actually, his presence in the center of the work is explained by the fact that he is a model of a new person undergoing a “remake”. The author spoke about him in his speech: “Morozka is a man with a difficult past... He could steal, he could curse rudely, he could lie, get drunk. All these traits of his character are undoubtedly his great shortcomings. But in difficult, decisive moments of the struggle, he did what was necessary for the revolution, overcoming his weaknesses. The process of his participation in the revolutionary struggle was the process of the formation of his personality ... "
Speaking about the selection of "human material", the writer had in mind not only those who turned out to be necessary for the revolution. People "unsuitable" for the construction of a new society are ruthlessly discarded. Such a hero in the novel is Sword. It is no coincidence that this man social background belongs to the intelligentsia and consciously joins the partisan detachment, driven by the idea of the revolution as a great romantic event. Mechik's belonging to a different class, despite his conscious desire to fight for the revolution, immediately alienates those around him. “To tell the truth, Frost did not like the rescued at first sight. Frost did not like clean people. In his life practice, these were fickle, worthless people who could not be trusted. This is the first certification that the Mechik receives. Morozka's doubts are in tune with the words of V. Mayakovsky: "An intellectual does not like risk, / He is red in moderation, like a radish." Revolutionary ethics is built on a rigidly rational approach to the world and man. The author of the novel himself said: “The sword, another“ hero ”of the novel, is very“ moral ”from the point of view of the ten commandments ... but these qualities remain external to him, they cover up his inner egoism, lack of devotion to the cause of the working class, his purely petty individualism ". Here, the morality of the ten commandments and devotion to the cause of the working class are directly contrasted. Author preaching triumph revolutionary idea, does not notice that the connection of this idea with life turns into violence against life, cruelty. For him, the professed idea is not utopian, and therefore any cruelty is justified.
- this is a written reflection on the specified topic, which every 11th grader must pass without fail for admission to the Unified State Examinations (USE). In December 2018-2019, schoolchildren will write this species work for the 5th time already, because it has been approved in Russia since 2014.
A prerequisite for a well-written final essay is the presence of arguments - justifications for the chosen position, which are based on the works of Russian or foreign classical. So what arguments will help schoolchildren cope with the task this year?
General Facts
The minimum amount of the final essay is 250 words, while experts recommend writing more - an average of about 300-350 words in order to cover the topic fully and comprehensively. The structure of the work is not regulated, but practice shows that the most a large number of points are given to such written reflections that contain 3 key blocks: introduction, main part and conclusion with conclusions. You have 3 hours and 55 minutes to write your essay. The guys have the opportunity to refer to spelling dictionaries, which should be available in the office in sufficient quantities.
The highest score for the final essay is 10 points. Even if the student allows 1 non-rough spelling mistake, the expert commission will give him the maximum possible number of points. The final assessment depends on how the teenager takes into account the fundamental criteria. These include:
- Subject fit. It is important to write the final essay only in the context of a given topic/question, not to spread your thoughts along the tree and not move on to consideration of third-party problems.
- Argumentation and attraction literary material. It is not enough just to express a certain position - in your arguments you also need to rely on at least one work of a Russian or foreign classic. It is important to demonstrate not only knowledge of the material, but also the ability to analyze it. When writing the final essay of 2018-2019, a simple retelling or superficial mention of the works will not be enough.
- Composition and logic of reasoning. Here the structure of the work and the sequence of presentation are evaluated. It is recommended that each new thought begin with a new paragraph. At the same time, the main part should be larger in volume than the introduction and conclusion (in total, the last blocks should be about 1/3 of the entire text).
- The quality of writing. In his argument to the student high school you will need to use synonyms and various speech turns, and, conversely, avoid clichés and lexical repetitions.
- Literacy. It checks for the presence / absence of spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors.
Information:
This year, the dates for writing the final essay are determined as follows:
- December 19, 2018 (main date)
- February 6, 2019 (additional dates)
- May 8, 2019 (additional dates)
As in previous years, the final essay is the admission of graduates to the state final certification. At the same time, students with disabilities have the right to choose the writing of the presentation. As part of open destinations topics of the final essay, specific topics of the final essay are developed (texts of presentations are selected) for each time zone separately. Specific topics of the final essay (texts of presentations) are delivered to the local education authorities on the day of the final essay (statement).
Final essay (statement) as admission to the exam graduates educational organizations implementing programs of secondary general education, first introduced in 2014-2015 academic year pursuant to the instructions of the President Russian Federation in order to identify students' ability to think, analyze and prove their position based on independently selected works of domestic and world literature.
The following categories of persons may write the statement:
- students with disabilities or disabled and handicapped children;
- students of educational programs secondary general education in special educational institutions closed type, as well as in institutions executing punishment in the form of deprivation of liberty;
- students studying at home, in educational organizations, including sanatorium-and-spa, where the necessary medical, rehabilitation and recreational activities for those in need of long-term treatment based on the conclusion of a medical organization.
The final essay, if desired, can also be written by graduates of previous years to present its results when entering universities.
Writing time - 3 hours 55 minutes.
The examination set includes 5 essay topics from a closed list (one topic from each open thematic area).
The topics of essays themselves will be known to graduates 15 minutes before the start of the exam. The result of the final essay (statement) will be “pass” or “fail”, however, only graduates who have received a “pass” will be allowed to pass the unified state exam and the state final exam.
Topics, as in the past year, will be formed by time zones.
The essay is evaluated according to five criteria: relevance to the topic; argumentation, attraction of literary material; composition; speech quality; literacy.
They check the essays (statements) of the Commission of educational organizations or expert commissions created at the municipal / regional level.
Directions and topics
Each final essay must be written in accordance with a specific topic. However, they are only opened 15 minutes before the start of the test. Despite this, there is an opportunity to prepare in advance for writing the final essay in 2018-2019, because both teachers and their wards are aware of the so-called. "global directions". The final topics that the students will receive will necessarily fit within the framework of these particular areas.
In other words, the topics will simply turn out to be more detailed, fractional, concretized. But knowledge of the directions allows you to orient yourself and even pick up suitable arguments from literary works domestic school curriculum already in currently. There will be 5 directions in total.
Fathers and Sons
Arguments for the final essay of 2018-2019 on the global direction "Fathers and Sons" can be found in work of the same name I.S. Turgenev. The novel "Fathers and Sons" is one of the most suitable for substantiating theses related to the problem of "generational conflict". Representatives of the "generation of children" are Evgeny Bazarov ( main character) and Arkady Kirsanov, and the representatives of the “generation of fathers” are Pavel Petrovich and Nikolai Petrovich Kirsanov.
The book shows how young people who position themselves as nihilists (deniers of generally accepted norms) devalue the experience of adults who are considered non-progressive traditionalists. In its turn, older generation also does not seek to understand the youth. In conclusion, the author debunks the teachings of nihilism and proclaims the only way through which it is possible to end the eternal conflict is the reunion of relatives who have learned to love each other after knowing suffering.
Other works to bring arguments to the topics in the direction of "Fathers and Sons" in the December 2018-2019 essay:
- DI. Fonvizin, play "Undergrowth";
- M.Yu. Lermontov, poem "Mtsyri";
- N.V. Gogol, story "Taras Bulba";
- A.S. Pushkin, story Captain's daughter».
Dream or reality
The direction "Dream or Reality" is deeply philosophical, because. makes you think about the interweaving of the most cherished human desires and reality. Example positive heroine, who remains true to her dream and does everything possible to realize it, is Marya Mironova from the story of A.S. Pushkin "The Captain's Daughter"
Everything Masha wants, the commandant's daughter Belogorsk fortress, - to live calmly and happily together with your loved one, who becomes officer Pyotr Grinev. However, the girl has to overcome many trials on her way before she finally reunites with her love, because both Peter and Masha fall into the thick of the Pugachev uprising. Despite this, the girl does not give up on her dream and does not lose her fortitude. Even when hope is almost lost, she takes fate into her own hands and goes to Empress Catherine II with a request to contribute to the release of Peter. Thanks to fearlessness, Masha achieves a dream come true, namely, she becomes the wife of her beloved man.
Also the arguments for December essay 2018-2019 in the direction of "Dream and Reality" can be found in the following works:
- F.M. Dostoevsky, the novel "Crime and Punishment" (Rodion Raskolnikov as an example of a dangerous dreamer who should be afraid of his desires);
- A.N. Ostrovsky, play "Thunderstorm".
Revenge and generosity
Here the student will have the opportunity to compare the most different sides and qualities of human nature: kindness and malice, mercy and cruelty, peacefulness and aggressiveness...
Inconsistency, negativity, pettiness, stupidity and the all-destroying beginning of revenge were vividly shown by A.S. Pushkin in his novel "Eugene Onegin". The destructive feeling with which the protagonist lights up leads to the fact that he kills his former friend in a duel. good friend- good little Vladimir Lensky. At the same time, an example of a deeply generous person is found in the work - we are talking about Tatyana Larina, who throughout the novel puts the feelings of the people around her above her own (for example, at the end of the book she rejects Onegin who fell in love with her because she cannot betray her husband).
Additionally, arguments in the direction of "Revenge and generosity" for the final essay of 2018-2019 can be found in the following books:
- A.S. Pushkin, the story "The Captain's Daughter" (Emelyan Pugachev as a person who knows how to be generous and noble in relation to those who deserve it);
- M.Yu. Lermontov, the novel "A Hero of Our Time" (part of "Princess Mary" and, in particular, the vindictiveness of Grushnitsky's nature).
Art and craft
Destiny Theme creative person(writer, artist, musician, etc.) is one of the fundamental in literature. It is possible to analyze the phenomenon of creativity and reflect the importance of creative work thanks to the work of A.T. Tvardovsky "Vasily Terkin". The poem shows how music uplifts the spirit and warms the soul of those who hear it, even when the hardest times of war are raging around. However, the music that allows people to forget about sorrows does not exist on its own - it is carried into this world by a musician, who here is the harmonist Vasily Terkin.
Also, arguments for topics in the direction of "Art and Craft" are found in the following authors:
- V. Korolenko, story "The Blind Musician";
- A.P. Chekhov, story "Rothschild's Violin";
- K.G. Paustovsky, story "Basket with fir cones".
Kindness and cruelty
This direction partially echoes the direction "Revenge and generosity". Here the emphasis is on the importance of a humanistic attitude to life in general, to any life, regardless of who owns it.
In the novel by F.M. Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment" the main character, Rodion Raskolnikov, decides to kill the old money-lender. Rodion thinks that he is better than a worthless old woman, and, therefore, has the right to rid the world of her existence. However, when the hero commits murder, he realizes that in reality he is worse, many times worse than the most useless and vicious of the old women. To finally understand this, he is helped by the one he met on the life path Sonya Marmeladova is an example of kindness, virtue and forgiveness. Thanks to her, Raskolnikov abandons inhuman ideas and changes his worldview.
Other examples in the direction of "Kindness and cruelty":
- N.V. Gogol, the story "The Overcoat" (the cruelty of a hypocritical and evil society is opposed by the kindness, simplicity and harmlessness of Akaky Akakievich);
- M.A. Sholokhov, novel Quiet Don”(Calllessness and cruelty can arise in a person’s soul under the influence of external circumstances, as happened with the Cossack peasant Grigory, who was forced to go to war and start killing so as not to die himself).
The most important thing in the final essay is examples from the literature. It is they who determine the attitude of the jury to the work. Therefore, it is so important to take the time to read high-quality collections with arguments that will reveal the main topics within one direction. Here is an article for you. But we need your help to improve it! Write in the comments what books you need to add to our list, and the Literaguru team will definitely do it.
In M. Gorky's play "At the Bottom" the relationship of the characters is built on bitterness and revenge. Each of them, without hesitation, takes revenge on everyone else for having fallen to the bottom of life. All these poor people pull each other deeper 'cause way back no one should have it if you don't have it yourself. This is the unwritten law of a rooming house. For example, Vasilisa is a tyrant younger sister because of jealousy. Her lover, Vaska Pepel, showed sympathy for her, and this outraged the despotic woman. Her revenge reached its climax in the finale, when her lawful husband died as a result of a fight. Now Ash is threatened with true penal servitude, but his former lady of the heart does nothing to save him, on the contrary: she diligently drowns everyone in her slander. Even her "love" for Vaska does not stop the heroine's vindictive nature. Obviously, revenge is a feeling that destroys a person from the inside and expels all virtues from him.
In M. Gorky's play "At the Bottom" the characters are not inclined to show generosity. On the contrary, they seek to hurt and prick each other more painfully, because poverty drives out of them everything that makes a person a person. But there is one wanderer who tears vicious circle insults and insults. This is Luka. He also lived difficult life, even hinted that he had escaped from hard labor. But these tests did not harden him. The old man finds affectionate words of support and participation for each interlocutor. True generosity to all those around him shines in his eyes. He gave the inhabitants of the bottom hope for a bright future, and they themselves are to blame for the fact that this was not enough for their moral rebirth. In their caustic environment, the wanderer did not last long and left, probably realizing that these poor people do not have not only a home, but also a heart, since they ruthlessly drown each other. Unfortunately, generosity cannot always help people.
A. I. Kuprin, "Duel"
In A. I. Kuprin’s book “Duel”, the main character courts the officer’s wife, and the woman encourages his attempts to get closer. Romashov is sincerely in love, only Shurochka plays with his feelings. She mercilessly dooms him to death for the sake of her husband's advancement. It's not that a close person is important to her, she just longs for a transfer to a new place where she can have fun. Due to gossip and anonymous notes, the deceived spouse assigns a duel to Romashov. He wants to avenge the trampled honor. Shura assures the hero that they will shoot themselves “for fun”, only so that Nikolaev is not considered a coward. A young lieutenant believes in his beloved woman, but in a duel her husband kills an opponent, rising in the eyes of fellow soldiers. Unfortunately, in the society of that time, revenge was considered the norm, so hundreds of young people capable of more became its victims. It can be concluded that revenge is dangerous for people because, because of a sense of imaginary justice, they appropriate the right to dispose of other people's lives.
In A. I. Kuprin’s book “Duel”, Romashov abandons his annoying mistress. But the woman doesn't want to let go young man and vows that she will take revenge on him at any cost. Raisa Aleksandrovna Peterson was a desperate adventuress. She decided she had to compromise new connection second lieutenant, but he and Shurochka had absolutely nothing. But Mrs. Peterson, because of her depravity, thought differently and sent out anonymous letters exposing the betrayal of Nikolev's wife. The deceived husband flared up and demanded a duel. As a result of the intrigues of Shurochka herself, Romashov was killed, and her husband victoriously "defended the honor of the family." The consequences of revenge are always tragic: an innocent person is killed, and no tricks can bring him back.
A. S. Pushkin, "Eugene Onegin"
In the novel by A. S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin" revenge led to a tragedy: the young poet Lensky was killed. It all started with the fact that the main character received a letter where Tatyana confessed her love to him. He rejected the girl's feelings, citing his unsuitability for family relations. Naturally, he did not want to embarrass her with his presence, but an enthusiastic friend invites him to Tatiana's name day. There he expects to spend a pleasant evening with the bride. Eugene agrees, but at the very evening he feels an extreme degree of awkwardness. He blames Vladimir for everything and decides to take revenge on him, flirting with his beloved, Olga, a windy coquette. Lensky was furious, because he did not get the attention of the girl. He challenged his opponent to a duel, and Eugene could not refuse. As a result, Onegin killed his comrade because of his petty and stupid revenge. Here are the consequences of the imaginary pursuit of justice.
In the novel by A. S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin" the ideal of a generous woman is depicted. This is Tatyana Larina. Her soul can truly be called great, because she neglected her passion in order to preserve family well-being. Once in her youth, the girl fell in love with a visiting nobleman who did not take her feelings seriously. But the heroine kept them in her heart forever, even though she married another person. She did not love the general, but she respected him and was grateful to him for the admiration with which he treated her. When, after many years, Eugene returned from wandering around the world, he was inflamed with passion for Tatyana. But she was married and refused the one whom she still loved unconditionally. The heroine generously rejected her own happiness in order to maintain peace and joy. loved one. For true generosity requires self-denial.
A. S. Pushkin, The Queen of Spades
In the drama of A. S. Pushkin " Queen of Spades» The hero is trying with all his might to find out the secret of three cards - the secret that allowed him to always win at cards. He wanted to make a big fortune and take a high place in society, but long years work seemed ridiculous to him when he learned from Tomsky that his relative could tell you how to always win. Then Hermann launched an attack on the pupil of the countess, confessing his feelings to the unfortunate girl. She could not resist and invited the young man to a date night in the house. The hero came, but he was not interested in Lisa, but in the old woman with her secret. He scared the unfortunate woman, she died. But her ghost returned and gave away the desired secret in exchange for a promise to marry Lisa. Hermann, of course, did not restrain him, but sat down at the gaming table. However, the decisive battle let him down: he lost all his money. The revenge of the old woman was terrible: the young man went mad with grief. Author teaches important lesson: revenge cannot be predicted, it will appear at any moment, so you should not commit reprehensible acts in the hope of avoiding retribution.
Lack of generosity can destroy a person. Such an example is demonstrated by A. S. Pushkin in the drama The Queen of Spades. The hero uses an innocent girl for selfish purposes, trying to find out from her patroness the secret of three cards in order to always win in card fights. To do this, he does not disdain deception. Lisa lets him into the Countess's house, but Hermann only came there to find out the secret. He did not spare the elderly woman either, actually bringing her to death with his threats. After the ghost nevertheless shares the necessary information with him, the hero still did not come to his senses, breaking his word. He did not marry the abandoned Lisa. He was only concerned about his own success, and he did not spare the people who played with him and suffered ruin. As a result, Hermann loses his mind, because after the collapse, no one will help him, an egoist, and he knows this. If the hero were generous, he reached the goal in an honest way and lived happy life, full of love, sympathy and harmony, and not a brief moment of success, consisting of deceit, crimes and sins.
M. Yu. Lermontov, "A Hero of Our Time"
In the novel by M. Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time" the author describes tragic consequences revenge on the example of Kazbich, who killed the kidnapped girl in order to take revenge on Pechorin. At the beginning of the chapter, Maxim Maksimych reports that Grigory fell in love with a Caucasian beauty and decided to steal her away by bribing her brother. He promised him the famous Kazbich horse, which Azamat dreamed of. The deal was completed, Bela was captured by Pechorin. But Kazbich sought her hand, so he was very angry when he found out about this and decided to take revenge on the offender. When Grigory and Maxim Maksimych went hunting, the hero took the girl, but they were quickly overtaken. Fleeing from the chase and realizing that they cannot escape together, the kidnapper kills the victim and leaves him on the road. Did he achieve justice with his revenge? No. He only killed the beautiful Bela, left with nothing.
In the novel by M. Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time" the whole inconsistency of revenge is proved. Grushnitsky tried to achieve justice with it, but he himself fell victim to his desire. The fact is that he was trying to impress Princess Mary. He was in love, but the girl remained indifferent to him, because next to her was a more skilled gentleman - Pechorin. Grigory made a young girl fall in love with him by acting cold towards her, which spurred her vanity and kindled her curiosity. In desperation, the junker decided to take revenge on his successful opponent. Together with friends, he noticed Pechorin leaving the princess's house at night. He left his mistress Vera, but Grushnitsky accused him of seducing Mary. Naturally, Gregory challenged the liar to a duel. Then the cowardly slanderer decided not to load his pistol in order to win the duel and get rid of the opponent. But Grigory saw through the deceiver, and it was Grushnitsky who became the victim. What did he achieve with his revenge? Nothing but your own death.
Interesting? Save it on your wall!
Revenge or refuse revenge? V. Zakrutkin thinks about such a question.
The problem considered by the author is relevant, because it concerns each of us, because we all have ever encountered this low human feeling, a sense of revenge. The author reveals the problem on the example of a case from the life of a Russian peasant woman Maria and a young German soldier. The girl shows mercy to the wounded fighter and leaves him life, which testifies to her good disposition and ability to compassion. The author sympathizes with his characters. His sympathy is clearly on the side main character.
V. Zakrutkin believes that one should not thoughtlessly and recklessly take revenge on a person only because he belongs to any social group. After all, he may be completely innocent of the bad deeds that his associates commit.
I agree with the position of the author and also believe that revenge is not always appropriate and necessary individual approach when deciding the question: "To take revenge or not to take revenge?".
In the epic novel L.N. Tolstoy "War and Peace". Russian soldiers warm and feed Rambal and Morel, and they, embracing them, sing a song. And it seems that the stars are happily whispering to each other. Perhaps they admire the nobility of the Russian soldiers, who chose instead of revenge sympathy for defeated enemy.
This is also the position of the writer Grossman in the work "Life and Fate". Yes, war brings death. But even during the war, a person can overcome the desire to take revenge former enemy who is unarmed and suffering.
Thus, revenge or non-revenge is a choice that each of us can face. You should not succumb to momentary emotions, but try to think over all the consequences and make an informed decision.
The text on which the essay is based:
(1) Clutching the pitchfork in her hand, Mary threw back the cover of the manhole and recoiled. (2) On the earthen floor of the cellar, leaning against a low tub, sat a living German soldier. (3) At some elusive moment, Maria noticed that the German was afraid of her, and realized that he was unarmed.
(4) Hatred and hot, blind anger swept over Mary, squeezed her heart, rushed to her throat with nausea. (5) A scarlet mist covered her eyes, and in this thin mist she saw a silent crowd of farmers, and Ivan swaying on a poplar branch, and bare feet Fenya hanging on a poplar, and a black noose around Vasyatka's baby neck, and them, the fascist executioners, dressed in gray uniforms with a black ribbon on their sleeves. (6) Now here, in her, Mary's, cellar, lay one of them, a half-crushed, unfinished bastard, dressed in the same gray uniform, with the same black ribbon on his sleeve, on which the same foreign, incomprehensible, hooked letters were silver ...
(7) Here is the last step. (8) Mary stopped. (9) She took another step forward, the German boy moved.
(10) Maria raised her pitchfork high, turned slightly away so as not to see the terrible thing she had to do, and at that moment she heard a quiet, stifled cry, which seemed to her like thunder:
Mother! Ma-a-ma!
(11) A faint cry of many red-hot knives dug into Mary's chest, pierced her heart, and short word"Mom" made her shudder from unbearable pain. (12) Maria dropped her pitchfork, her legs buckled. (13) She fell to her knees and, before losing consciousness, she saw close, close, light blue, boyish eyes wet with tears ...
(14) She woke up from the touch of the wet hands of the wounded. (15) Choking with sobs, he stroked her hand and said something in his own language, which Mary did not know. (16) But by the expression of his face, by the movement of his fingers, she understood that the German was talking about himself: that he had not killed anyone, that his mother was the same as Maria, a peasant woman, and his father had recently died near the city of Smolensk, that he himself, having barely finished school, was mobilized and sent to the front, that he had never been in a single battle, he only brought food to the soldiers.
(17) Mary silently wept. (18) The death of her husband and son, the theft of the farmers and the death of the farm, martyr days and nights in the cornfield - everything that she experienced in her heavy loneliness broke her, and she wanted to cry out her grief, tell a living person about it, the first, whom she met for everything last days. (19) And although this man was dressed in a gray, hated form of the enemy, he was seriously wounded, moreover, he turned out to be just a boy and - apparently - could not be a murderer. (20) And Mary was horrified that a few minutes ago, holding a sharp pitchfork in her hands and blindly obeying the feeling of anger and revenge that had seized her, she herself could kill him. (21) After all, only holy word“mother”, that prayer that this unfortunate boy put into his quiet, choking cry, saved him.
(22) With a careful touch of her fingers, Maria unbuttoned the German's bloody shirt, tore it slightly, and exposed her narrow chest. (23) There was only one wound on her back, and Maria realized that the second fragment of the bomb did not come out, sat somewhere in her chest.
(24) She squatted next to the German and, supporting his hot back of the head with her hand, gave him milk to drink. (25) Without releasing her hand, the wounded man sobbed.
(26) And Mary understood, could not help but understand that she is the last person whom the German doomed to death sees in his life, that in these bitter and solemn hours of his farewell to life in her, in Mary, everything that is still connects him with people - mother, father, sky, sun, native German land, trees, flowers, all huge and beautiful world, which slowly leaves the consciousness of the dying. (27) And his thin, dirty hands outstretched to her, and the fading look full of prayer and despair - Mary understood this too - express the hope that she is able to defend his passing life, drive away death ...
(According to V. Zakrutkin)
