WHAT IS A Severed Human Head Thinking?
The tradition of beheading has deep roots in the history and culture of many nations. For example, in one of the biblical deuterocanonical books, famous story Judith, a beautiful Jewess who tricked her into the camp of the Assyrians who were besieging her hometown and, having crept into the confidence of the enemy commander Holofernes, cut off his head at night.
Decapitation in Europe
In the largest European states, decapitation was considered one of the most noble types of executions. The ancient Romans used it in relation to their citizens, since the process of beheading is quick and not as painful as crucifixion, which was subjected to criminals without Roman citizenship.
In Medieval Europe, beheading was also held in high esteem. Heads were cut off only to the nobles; peasants and artisans were hanged and drowned.
Only in the 20th century was decapitation recognized Western civilization inhumane and barbaric. Currently, beheading as a capital punishment is used only in the countries of the Middle East: in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Iran.
Judith and Holofernes
History of the guillotine
Heads were usually chopped off with axes and swords. At the same time, if in some countries, for example, in Saudi Arabia, the executioners always passed special training, then in the Middle Ages, simple guards or artisans were often used to carry out the sentence. As a result, in many cases, it was not possible to cut off the head the first time, which led to terrible torment of the condemned and the indignation of the crowd of onlookers.
Therefore, in late XVIII century, the guillotine was first introduced as an alternative and more humane instrument of execution. Contrary to popular belief, this instrument was not named after its inventor, the surgeon Antun Louis.
The godfather of the death machine was Joseph Ignace Guillotin, an anatomy professor who first proposed using a mechanism for decapitation, which, in his opinion, would not cause additional pain to the convicts.
The first sentence with the help of a terrible novelty was carried out in 1792 in post-revolutionary France. The guillotine made it possible to actually turn human deaths into a real pipeline; thanks to her, in just one year, the Jacobin executioners executed more than 30,000 French citizens, setting up real terror for their people.
However, a couple of years later, the decapitation machine gave a solemn reception to the Jacobins themselves to the joyful cries and hooting of the crowd. France used the guillotine as a capital punishment until 1977, when the last head was cut off on European soil.
The guillotine was used in Europe until 1977
But what happens during a beheading in terms of physiology?
As you know, the cardiovascular system delivers oxygen and other necessary substances to the brain through the blood arteries, which are necessary for its normal functioning. Decapitation interrupts the closed circulatory system, blood pressure drops rapidly, depriving the brain of a fresh blood supply. The suddenly oxygen-deprived brain quickly ceases to function.
The time during which the head of the executed person can remain conscious in this case depends largely on the method of execution. If an inept executioner needed several blows to separate the head from the body, blood flowed from the arteries even before the end of the execution - the severed head was already dead for a long time.
Head of Charlotte Corday
The guillotine was an ideal instrument of death, its knife cut the criminal's neck with lightning speed and very accurately. In post-revolutionary France, where executions took place in public, the executioner often raised his head, which had fallen into a basket of bran, and mockingly showed it to a crowd of onlookers.
So, for example, in 1793, after the execution of Charlotte Corday, who stabbed one of the leaders of the French Revolution, Jean-Paul Marat, according to eyewitnesses, the executioner, taking the severed head by the hair, mockingly whipped her on the cheeks. To the great astonishment of the onlookers, Charlotte's face turned red, and her features twisted into a grimace of indignation.
Thus, the first documentary report of eyewitnesses was compiled that a human head cut off by a guillotine is capable of retaining consciousness. But far from the last.
Murder scene of Marat by Charlotte Corday
What explains the grimaces on the face?
The debate about whether the human brain is capable of continuing to think after beheading has been going on for many decades. Some believed that the grimaces that the faces of the executed were due to the usual spasms of the muscles that control the movements of the lips and eyes. Similar spasms have often been observed in other severed human limbs.
The difference is that, unlike the arms and legs, the head contains the brain, the thought center that can consciously control the movements of the muscles. When the head is cut off, in principle, no injury is caused to the brain, so it is able to function until the lack of oxygen leads to loss of consciousness and death.
severed head
Testimony of doctors and eyewitnesses
The idea of what a severed human head can experience while remaining fully conscious is, of course, terrifying. A US Army veteran who was in a car accident with a friend in 1989 described the face of his comrade who had his head blown off: “At first it expressed shock, then horror, and at the end fear was replaced by sadness ...”
According to eyewitnesses, English king Charles I and Queen Anne Boleyn, after being executed at the hands of the executioner, moved their lips, trying to say something.
Strongly opposing the use of the guillotine, the German scientist Sommering referred to the numerous records of doctors that the faces of the executed were contorted in pain when the doctors touched the cut of the spinal canal with their fingers.
The most famous of this kind of evidence comes from the pen of Dr. Borier, who examined the head of the executed criminal Henri Langil. The doctor writes that within 25-30 seconds after decapitation, he called Langil twice by name, and each time he opened his eyes and fixed his gaze on Boryo.
Mechanism for the execution of the death penalty by decapitation
Conclusion
Eyewitness accounts, as well as a number of experiments on animals, prove that after decapitation, a person can remain conscious for several seconds; he is able to hear, look and react.
Fortunately, such information may still be useful only to researchers from some Arab countries where decapitation is still popular as a legal capital punishment. The severed head bit the executioner mystical stories. What is true and what is fiction is hard to figure out. At all times, these stories attracted great attention of the public, because everyone understood with their minds that their head without a body (and vice versa) would not live long, but they wanted to believe otherwise ... A terrible incident during an execution. For thousands of years, decapitation was used as a form of the death penalty. IN medieval Europe such an execution was considered "honorable", the head was chopped off mainly to aristocrats. The gallows or the fire were waiting for people simpler. In those days, beheading with a sword, ax or ax was a relatively painless and quick death, especially with the great experience of the executioner and the sharpness of his weapon. In order for the executioner to try, the convict or his relatives paid him a lot of money, this was facilitated by widely circulating horror stories about a blunt sword and a clumsy executioner who cut off the head of an unfortunate convict with only a few blows ... For example, it is documented that in 1587, during the execution of the Scottish Queen Mary Stuart, the executioner took three blows to deprive her of her head, and even then after that he had to resort to the help of a knife… More were worse cases where non-professionals took over. In 1682, the French Count de Samozhes was terribly unlucky - they failed to get a real executioner for his execution. Two criminals agreed to perform his work for a pardon. They were so frightened by such a responsible job and so worried about their future that they cut off the count's head only on the 34th attempt! Residents of medieval cities often became eyewitnesses of beheadings, for them the execution was something like a free performance, so many tried to take a seat closer to the scaffold in advance in order to see such a nerve-wracking process in detail. Then such thrill-seekers, rounding their eyes, whispered how the severed head grimaced or how its lips “managed to whisper the last forgiveness.” It was widely believed that a severed head still lives and sees for about ten seconds. That is why the executioner raised his severed head and showed it to those gathered in the city square, it was believed that the executed in his last seconds sees the crowd jubilant, hooting and laughing at him. I don’t know whether to believe it or not, but somehow in a book I read about a rather terrible incident that happened during one of the executions. Usually the executioner raised his head to show the crowd by the hair, but in this case the executed was bald or shaved, in general, the vegetation near his brain receptacle was completely absent, so the executioner decided to raise his head by the upper jaw and, without thinking twice, put his fingers into his open mouth. Immediately, the executioner screamed and his face distorted with a grimace of pain, and no wonder, because the jaws of the severed head clenched ... The already executed man managed to bite his executioner! What does a severed head feel like? French revolution put decapitation on stream, using "small mechanization" - the guillotine invented in those days. Heads flew in such quantities that some inquisitive surgeon for his experiments easily begged from the executioner a whole basket of male and female "mind vessels". He tried to sew human heads to the bodies of dogs, but failed in this "revolutionary" undertaking a complete fiasco. At the same time, scientists began to be more and more tormented by the question - what does a severed head feel and how long does it live after? fatal blow guillotine blades? Only in 1983, after a special medical study, scientists were able to answer the first half of the question. Their conclusion was this: despite the sharpness of the instrument of execution, the skill of the executioner or the lightning speed of the guillotine, a person’s head (and body, probably!) Experiences several seconds of severe pain. Many naturalists of the 18th-19th centuries had no doubt that a severed head was capable of living for a very short time and in some cases even thinking. Now there is an opinion that the final death of the head occurs a maximum of 60 seconds after the execution. In 1803, in Breslau, a young doctor, Wendt, who later became a university professor, conducted a rather macabre experiment. On February 25, Wendt begged for scientific purposes the head of the executed murderer Troer. He received his head from the hands of the executioner immediately after the execution. First of all, Wendt conducted experiments with then popular electricity: when he applied a plate of a galvanic apparatus to a cut spinal cord, the face of the executed man was distorted by a grimace of suffering. The inquisitive doctor did not stop there, he made a quick false movement, as if about to pierce Troer's eyes with his fingers, they quickly closed, as if noticing the danger that threatened them. Further, Wendt shouted loudly into his ears a couple of times: “Troer!” With each of his screams, the head opened its eyes, clearly reacting to its name. Moreover, an attempt of the head to say something was recorded, it opened its mouth and moved its lips a little. I wouldn’t be surprised if Troer tried to send a young man so disrespectful to death to hell ... In the final part of the experiment, a finger was put into the head’s mouth, while it clenched its teeth quite strongly, causing sensitive pain. For a full two minutes and 40 seconds, the head served the purposes of science, after which its eyes finally closed and all signs of life died out. In 1905, Wendt's experiment was partially repeated by a French doctor. He also shouted his name to the head of the executed man, while the eyes of the severed head opened, and the pupils focused on the doctor. The head reacted in this way twice to its name, and on the third Vital energy already ended. The body lives without a head! If the head can live for a short time without a body, then the body can also function for a short time without its “control center”! A unique case is known from history with Dietz von Schaunburg, who was executed in 1336. When King Ludwig of Bavaria sentenced von Schaunburg and four of his landsknechts to death for rebellion, the monarch, according to knightly tradition, asked the convict about his last wish. To the great astonishment of the king, Schaunburg asked him to pardon those of his comrades whom he could run past without a head after the execution. Considering this request as sheer nonsense, the king nevertheless promised to do it. Schaunburg himself arranged his friends in a row at a distance of eight paces from each other, after which he obediently knelt down and lowered his head to the chopping block, standing on the edge. The executioner's sword whistled through the air, the head literally bounced off the body, and then a miracle happened: Dietz's decapitated body jumped to its feet and ... ran. It was able to run past all four landsknechts, taking more than 32 steps, and only after that it stopped and fell. Both the condemned and those close to the king froze in horror for a short moment, and then the eyes of everyone turned to the monarch with a dumb question, everyone was waiting for his decision. Although the stunned Ludwig of Bavaria was sure that the devil himself helped Dietz to escape, he nevertheless kept his word and pardoned the friends of the executed. Another striking incident occurred in 1528 in the city of Rodstadt. The unjustly condemned monk said that after the execution he would be able to prove his innocence, and asked for a few minutes not to touch his body. The executioner's ax blew off the head of the convict, and three minutes later the decapitated body turned over, lay on its back, neatly crossing its arms over its chest. After that, the monk was already posthumously found not guilty ... In early XIX century during the colonial war in India, the commander of company "B" of the 1st Yorkshire line regiment, Captain T. Malven, was killed under extremely unusual circumstances. During the assault on Fort Amara, during hand-to-hand combat, Malven cut off the head of an enemy soldier with a saber. However, after that, the decapitated enemy managed to raise his rifle and shoot directly into the captain's heart. Documentary evidence of this incident in the form of a report by Corporal R. Crickshaw has been preserved in the archives of the British War Office. About a shocking incident during the Great Patriotic War, an eyewitness of which he was, a resident of the city of Tula, I. S. Koblatkin, told one of the newspapers: “We were raised to attack under shelling. The soldier ahead of me had his neck broken by a large fragment, so much so that his head literally hung behind his back, like a terrible hood ... Nevertheless, he continued to run before falling. The Phenomenon of the Missing Brain If there is no brain, what then coordinates the movements of the body, left without a head? Numerous cases have been described in medical practice that make it possible to raise the question of some kind of revision of the role of the brain in human life. For example, the famous German brain specialist Houfland had to fundamentally change his previous views when he opened the skull of a paralyzed patient. Instead of a brain, it turned out to be just over 300 grams of water, but his patient had previously retained all his mental capacity and was no different from a person with a brain! In 1935, a child was born at St. Vincent's Hospital in New York, in behavior he was no different from ordinary babies, he also ate, cried, reacted to his mother. When he died 27 days later, an autopsy revealed that the baby had no brain at all... In 1940, a 14-year-old boy was admitted to the clinic of the Bolivian doctor Nicola Ortiz, who complained of terrible headaches. Doctors suspected a brain tumor. He was unable to be helped and died two weeks later. An autopsy showed that his entire skull was occupied by a giant tumor that almost completely destroyed his brain. It turned out that the boy actually lived without a brain, but until his death he was not only conscious, but also retained sound thinking. An equally sensational fact was presented in a report by doctors Jan Bruel and George Albee in 1957 before the American Psychological Association. They told about their operation, during which the 39-year-old patient was completely removed all right hemisphere brain. Their patient not only survived, but also fully retained his mental abilities, and they were above average. The list of such cases could be continued. Many people after operations, head injuries, terrible injuries continued to live, move and think without a significant part of the brain. What helps them to maintain a sound mind and, in some cases, even efficiency? Relatively recently, American scientists announced the discovery of a “third brain” in humans. In addition to the brain and spinal cord, they also found the so-called "abdominal brain", represented by an accumulation of nervous tissue on the inside of the esophagus and stomach. According to New York City Research Center professor Michael Gershon, this "belly brain" has more than 100 million neurons, more than even the spinal cord. American researchers believe that it is the “abdominal brain” that gives the command to release hormones in case of danger, pushes a person either to fight or flee. According to scientists, this third “administrative center” remembers information, is able to accumulate life experience, affects our mood and well-being. Maybe it is in the “abdominal brain” that the key to the rational behavior of decapitated bodies lies? They still chop heads Alas, no abdominal brain will still allow them to live without a head, and they are still being chopped, even for princesses ... It would seem that beheading, as a kind of execution, has long sunk into oblivion, but back in the first half of the 60s x years. In the 20th century, it was used in the GDR, then, in 1966, the only guillotine broke and the criminals began to be shot. But in the Middle East, you can still quite officially lose your head. In 1980, a literal international shock caused documentary English cinematographer Anthony Thomas, which was called "Death of a Princess". It showed the public beheading of a Saudi princess and her lover. In 1995, a record 192 people were beheaded in Saudi Arabia. After that, the number of such executions began to decrease. In 1996, 29 men and one woman were beheaded in the kingdom. In 1997, approximately 125 people were beheaded around the world. At least as far back as 2005, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Qatar had laws allowing beheadings. It is authentically known that in Saudi Arabia a special executioner used his skills already in the new millennium.
One executioner, who executed the death sentences against French nobles at the end of the 18th century, said: “All executioners know very well that heads after being cut off live for another half an hour: they gnaw the bottom of the basket into which we throw them so much that this basket has to be changed according to at least once a month...
IN famous collection start present century"From the realm of the mysterious", compiled by Grigory Dyachenko, there is a small chapter: "Life after cutting off the head." Among other things, it notes the following: “It has already been said several times that a person, when his head is cut off, does not immediately stop living, but that his brain continues to think and muscles move, until, finally, the blood circulation stops completely and he will die completely ... ” Indeed, a head cut off from the body is capable of living for some time. The muscles in her face twitch and she grimace in response to being poked with sharp objects or having electrical currents connected to her.
On February 25, 1803, a murderer named Troer was executed in Breslau. The young doctor Wendt, who later became renowned professor, begged the head of the executed for conducting scientific experiments with it. Immediately after the execution, having received the head from the hands of the executioner, he applied the zinc plate of the galvanic apparatus to one of the front cut muscles of the neck. A strong contraction of muscle fibers followed. Then Wendt began to annoy the cut spinal cord An expression of suffering appeared on the face of the executed. Then Dr. Wendt made a gesture, as if wanting to poke his fingers into the eyes of the executed man - they immediately closed, as if noticing the impending danger. Then he turned the severed head to face the sun and his eyes closed again. After that, a hearing test was done. Wendt shouted loudly into his ears twice: "Troer!" - and at each call, the head opened its eyes and directed them in the direction from which the sound came, and it opened its mouth several times, as if it wanted to say something. Finally, they put a finger in her mouth, and her head clenched her teeth so hard that the one who put the finger felt pain. And only two minutes and forty seconds later my eyes closed and life finally died out in my head.
After the execution, life flickers for some time not only in the severed head, but also in the body itself. As historical chronicles testify, sometimes decapitated corpses with a large crowd of people showed real miracles of tightrope walking!
In 1336, King Louis of Bavaria sentenced the nobleman Dean von Schaunburg and four of his landsknechts to death because they dared to rebel against him and, as the chronicle says, "disturbed the peace of the country." Troublemakers, according to the custom of that time, had to cut off their heads.
Before his execution, according to chivalric tradition, Louis of Bavaria asked Dean von Schaunburg what his last wish would be. The desire of a state criminal turned out to be somewhat unusual. Dean did not demand, as was "practised", neither wine nor a woman, but asked the king to pardon the condemned landsknechts if he ran past them after ... his own execution. Moreover, so that the king would not suspect any trick, von Schaunburg specified that the condemned, including himself, would stand in a row at a distance of eight steps from each other, but only those who he passed by, having lost his head, were subject to pardon. can run. The monarch laughed out loud after hearing this nonsense, but promised to fulfill the wish of the doomed.
The executioner's sword fell. Von Schaunburg's head rolled off his shoulders, and his body ... jumped to his feet in front of the numb with horror of the king and courtiers present at the execution, irrigating the ground with a stream of blood frantically gushing from the stump of the neck, swiftly rushed past the landsknechts. Having passed the last one, that is, having made more than forty (!) steps, it stopped, twitched convulsively and collapsed to the ground.
The stunned king immediately concluded that the devil was involved. However, he kept his word: the landsknechts were pardoned.
Almost two hundred years later, in 1528, something similar happened in another German city, Rodstadt. Here they were sentenced to beheading and burning the body at the stake of a certain troublemaker monk, who, with his supposedly godless sermons, embarrassed the law-abiding population. The monk denied his guilt and after his death promised to immediately provide irrefutable evidence. And indeed, after the executioner cut off the preacher's head, his body fell with his chest on a wooden platform and lay there without moving for about three minutes. And then…then the unthinkable happened: the decapitated body rolled onto its back, laid right leg to the left, crossed her arms over her chest, and only after that she finally froze. Naturally, after such a miracle, the court of the Inquisition pronounced an acquittal and the monk was duly buried in the city cemetery ...
But let's leave the decapitated bodies alone. Let us ask ourselves the question: do any thought processes take place in a severed human head? Enough for this complex issue tried to answer at the end of the last century, the journalist of the French newspaper "Figaro" Michel Delin. Here is how he describes an interesting hypnotic experiment performed by the famous Belgian artist Wirtz on the head of a guillotined robber. “For a long time the artist has been occupied with the question: how long does the execution procedure last for the criminal himself and what feeling does the defendant experience in the last minutes of his life, what exactly does the head, separated from the body, think and feel, and in general, can it think and feel. Wirtz was well acquainted with the Brussels prison doctor, whose friend, Dr. D., had been practicing hypnotism for thirty years. The artist told him his desire get the suggestion that he is a criminal sentenced to the guillotine. On the day of the execution, ten minutes before the criminal was brought in, Wirtz, Dr. D. and two witnesses placed themselves at the bottom of the scaffold so that they were not visible to the public and in sight of the basket into which the head of the executed was to fall. Dr. D. put his medium to sleep by instilling in him to identify with the criminal, to follow all his thoughts and feelings, and to speak loudly the reflections of the condemned man at the moment when the ax touched his neck. Finally, he ordered him to penetrate the brain of the executed as soon as the head was separated from the body, and analyze the last thoughts of the deceased. Wirtz immediately fell asleep. A minute later steps were heard: it was the executioner leading the criminal. He was placed on the scaffold under the ax of the guillotine. Here Wirtz, shuddering, began to beg to be awakened, since the horror he was experiencing was unbearable. But it's' too late. The ax falls. “What do you feel, what do you see?” asks the doctor. Wirtz convulses and answers with a groan: “Lightning strike! Oh, terrible! She thinks, she sees…” - “Who thinks, who sees?” - “Head ... She suffers terribly ... She feels, thinks, she does not understand what has happened ... She is looking for her body ... It seems to her that the body will come for her ... She is waiting for the last blow - death, but death does not come ... "While Wirtz said these terrible words, the witnesses of the described scene looked at the head of the executed, with drooping hair, clenched eyes and mouth. The arteries still pulsed where the ax had cut them. Blood flooded his face.
The doctor kept asking, "What do you see, where are you?" “I am flying into immeasurable space… Am I really dead? Is it all over? Oh, if only I could connect with my body! People, take pity on my body! People, have pity on me, give me my body! Then I will live... I still think, I feel, I remember everything... Here are my judges in red robes... My unfortunate wife, my poor child! No, no, you don't love me anymore, you're leaving me... If you wanted to unite me with the body, I could still live among you... No, you don't want to... When will it all end? Is the sinner condemned to eternal torment? At these words of Wirtz, it seemed to those present that the eyes of the executed man opened wide and looked at them with an expression of inexpressible torment and prayer. The artist continued: “No, no! Suffering cannot go on forever. The Lord is merciful… Everything earthly leaves my eyes… In the distance I see a star shining like a diamond… Oh, how good it must be up there! Some kind of wave covers my whole being. How soundly I will fall asleep now ... Oh, what bliss! ... "They were last words hypnosis. Now he was fast asleep and no longer answered the doctor's questions. Dr. D. went up to the head of the executed man and felt his forehead, temples, teeth ... Everything was cold as ice, his head died.
In 1902, the famous Russian physiologist Professor A. A. Kulyabko, after successfully reviving the child's heart, tried to revive ... the head. True, for starters, just fish. A special liquid was passed through the blood vessels into the neatly cut off head of the fish - a substitute for blood. The result exceeded the wildest expectations: the fish head moved its eyes and fins, opened and closed its mouth, thus showing all the signs that life continues in it.
Kulyabko's experiments allowed his followers to advance even further in the field of head revival. In 1928, in Moscow, physiologists S. S. Bryukhonenko and S. I. Chechulin demonstrated an already living dog's head. Connected to a heart-lung machine, she did not look like a dead stuffed animal. When a cotton wool moistened with acid was placed on the tongue of this head, all signs of a negative reaction were found: grimaces, champing, there was an attempt to throw the cotton wool away. When putting sausage in the mouth, the head licked. If a stream of air was directed to the eye, a blinking reaction could be observed.
In 1959, the Soviet surgeon V.P. Demikhov repeatedly conducted successful experiments with severed dog heads, while arguing that it is quite possible to support life in the human head.
True, as far as is known, he himself did not undertake such attempts. For the first time, this was done only in the mid-80s by two German neurosurgeons, Walter Kreiter and Heinrich Kurij, who kept an amputated human head alive for twenty days.
The announcement of this at one time caused heated debate among medical theorists on the moral aspects of such experiments, but Kreiter and Kuridzh see nothing reprehensible in their experiments.
And it all started with the fact that the orderlies brought the body of a forty-year-old man, who had just got into car accident. His head was almost severed from his body and was held on only by a few veins. Salvation was out of the question, and in this situation, neurosurgeons decided to try to keep life at least in the brain of the victim. They connected a life support system to the head and for almost three weeks after that they kept the brain of a person whose body had long been dead in an active state. In addition, Kreiter and Kuridzh established contact with the head. Due to the lack of a throat, the head could not speak, but by the movement of her lips, scientists "read" a lot of words, from which it followed that she understood what had happened to her ...
It is clear that it is hard to believe in all this, and the fantastic novel by Alexander Belyaev immediately comes to mind. And yet, one would like to hope so much that the human body is not an indivisible whole, and that the same head, if one tries very hard, can be sewn intact to its original place.
In March 1990, the Lipetsk machine operator Valery Vdovits was sewn on his left arm, torn off almost at the shoulder by a machine for liming the soil. And nothing - works as before. So, maybe Alexander Belyaev was right and the “head of Professor Dowell” still has a chance?
The human body (anatomy, physiology, genetics, neurology) and religion
Death by decapitation
There are many different mystical stories about severed heads and decapitated bodies. What is true and what is fiction is hard to figure out. At all times, these stories attracted great attention of the public, because everyone understood with their minds that their head without a torso (and vice versa) would not live long, but I really wanted to believe the opposite...
A terrible incident during the execution
For thousands of years, beheading has been used as a form of capital punishment. In medieval Europe, such an execution was considered “honorable”, the heads were cut off mainly to aristocrats, the gallows or a fire were waiting for simpler people. In those days, beheading with a sword, ax or ax was a relatively painless and quick death, especially with the great experience of the executioner and the sharpness of his weapon.
In order for the executioner to try, the convict or his relatives paid him a lot of money, this was facilitated by the widely circulating terrible stories about a blunt sword and an incompetent executioner who cut off the head of an unfortunate convict with only a few blows ... For example, it is documented that in 1587 during the execution of the Scottish queen It took the executioner Mary Stuart three blows to deprive her of her head, and even then, after that, she had to resort to the help of a knife ...
Even worse were the cases when non-professionals got down to business. In 1682, the French Count de Samozhes was terribly unlucky - they failed to get a real executioner for his execution. Two criminals agreed to perform his work for a pardon. They were so frightened by such a responsible job and so worried about their future that they cut off the count's head only on the 34th attempt!
Residents of medieval cities often became eyewitnesses of beheadings, for them the execution was something like a free performance, so many tried to take a seat closer to the scaffold in advance in order to see such a nerve-wracking process in detail. Then such thrill-seekers, rounding their eyes, whispered how the severed head grimaced or how its mouth managed to whisper the last forgiveness.
It was widely believed that a severed head still lives and sees for about ten seconds. That is why the executioner raised his severed head and showed it to those gathered in the city square, it was believed that the executed in his last seconds sees the crowd jubilant, hooting and laughing at him.
I don’t know whether to believe it or not, but somehow in a book I read about a rather terrible incident that happened during one of the executions. Usually the executioner raised his head to show the crowd by the hair, but in this case the executed was bald or shaved, in general, the vegetation near his brain receptacle was completely absent, so the executioner decided to raise his head by the upper jaw and, without thinking twice, put his fingers into his open mouth. Immediately, the executioner screamed and his face distorted with a grimace of pain, and no wonder, because the jaws of the severed head clenched ... The already executed man managed to bite his executioner!
What does a severed head feel like?
The French Revolution put decapitation on stream, using "small-scale mechanization" - the guillotine invented at that time. Heads flew in such quantities that some inquisitive surgeon for his experiments easily begged from the executioner a whole basket of male and female "mind vessels". He tried to sew human heads to the bodies of dogs, but failed in this "revolutionary" undertaking a complete fiasco.
At the same time, scientists began to be more and more tormented by the question - what does the severed head feel and how long does it live after the fatal blow of the guillotine blade? Only in 1983, after a special medical study, scientists were able to answer the first half of the question. Their conclusion was this: despite the sharpness of the instrument of execution, the skill of the executioner or the lightning speed of the guillotine, a person’s head (and body, probably!) Experiences several seconds of severe pain.
Many naturalists of the 18th-19th centuries had no doubt that a severed head was capable of living for a very short time and in some cases even thinking. Now there is an opinion that the final death of the head occurs a maximum of 60 seconds after the execution.
In 1803, in Breslau, a young doctor, Wendt, who later became a university professor, conducted a rather macabre experiment. On February 25, Wendt begged for scientific purposes the head of the executed murderer Troer. He received his head from the hands of the executioner immediately after the execution. First of all, Wendt conducted experiments with then popular electricity: when he applied a plate of a galvanic apparatus to a cut spinal cord, the face of the executed man was distorted by a grimace of suffering.
The inquisitive doctor did not stop there, he made a quick false movement, as if about to pierce Troer's eyes with his fingers, they quickly closed, as if noticing the danger that threatened them. Further, Wendt shouted loudly into his ears a couple of times: “Troer!” With each of his screams, the head opened its eyes, clearly reacting to its name. Moreover, an attempt of the head to say something was recorded, it opened its mouth and moved its lips a little. I wouldn’t be surprised if Troer tried to send such a disrespectful young man to hell ...
In the final part of the experiment, a finger was put into the head's mouth, while it clenched its teeth quite hard, causing sensitive pain. For a full two minutes and 40 seconds, the head served the purposes of science, after which its eyes finally closed and all signs of life died out.
In 1905, Wendt's experiment was partially repeated by a French doctor. He also shouted his name to the head of the executed man, while the eyes of the severed head opened, and the pupils focused on the doctor. The head twice reacted in this way to its name, and the third time its life energy was already over.
The body lives without a head!
If the head can live for a short time without a body, then the body can also function for a short time without its “control center”! A unique case is known from history with Dietz von Schaunburg, who was executed in 1336. When King Ludwig of Bavaria sentenced von Schaunburg and four of his landsknechts to death for rebellion, the monarch, according to knightly tradition, asked the convict about his last wish. To the great astonishment of the king, Schaunburg asked him to pardon those of his comrades whom he could run past without a head after the execution.
Considering this request as sheer nonsense, the king nevertheless promised to do it. Schaunburg himself arranged his friends in a row at a distance of eight paces from each other, after which he obediently knelt down and lowered his head to the chopping block, standing on the edge. The executioner's sword whistled through the air, the head literally bounced off the body, and then a miracle happened: Dietz's decapitated body jumped to its feet and ... ran. It was able to run past all four landsknechts, taking more than 32 steps, and only after that it stopped and fell.
Both the condemned and those close to the king froze in horror for a short moment, and then the eyes of everyone turned to the monarch with a dumb question, everyone was waiting for his decision. Although the stunned Ludwig of Bavaria was sure that the devil himself helped Dietz to escape, he nevertheless kept his word and pardoned the friends of the executed.
Another striking incident occurred in 1528 in the city of Rodstadt. The unjustly condemned monk said that after the execution he would be able to prove his innocence, and asked for a few minutes not to touch his body. The executioner's ax blew off the head of the convict, and three minutes later the decapitated body turned over, lay on its back, neatly crossing its arms over its chest. After that, the monk was already posthumously found not guilty ...
At the beginning of the 19th century, during the colonial war in India, the commander of Company B, 1st Yorkshire Line Regiment, Captain T. Malven, was killed under extremely unusual circumstances. During the assault on Fort Amara, during hand-to-hand combat, Malven cut off the head of an enemy soldier with a saber. However, after that, the decapitated enemy managed to raise his rifle and shoot directly into the captain's heart. Documentary evidence of this incident in the form of a report by Corporal R. Crickshaw has been preserved in the archives of the British War Office.
A resident of the city of Tula, I. S. Koblatkin, reported a shocking incident during the Great Patriotic War, which he witnessed, in one of the newspapers: “We were raised to attack under shelling. The soldier ahead of me had his neck broken by a large fragment, so much so that his head literally hung behind his back, like a terrible hood ... Nevertheless, he continued to run before falling.
The phenomenon of the missing brain
If there is no brain, what then coordinates the movements of the body, left without a head? Numerous cases have been described in medical practice that make it possible to raise the question of some kind of revision of the role of the brain in human life. For example, the famous German brain specialist Houfland had to fundamentally change his previous views when he opened the skull of a paralyzed patient. Instead of a brain, it contained a little more than 300 grams of water, but his patient had previously retained all his mental abilities and was no different from a person with a brain!
In 1935, a child was born at St. Vincent's Hospital in New York, in behavior he was no different from ordinary babies, he also ate, cried, reacted to his mother. When he died 27 days later, the autopsy revealed that the baby had no brain at all...
In 1940, a 14-year-old boy was admitted to the clinic of the Bolivian doctor Nicola Ortiz, who complained of terrible headaches. Doctors suspected a brain tumor. He was unable to be helped and died two weeks later. An autopsy showed that his entire skull was occupied by a giant tumor that almost completely destroyed his brain. It turned out that the boy actually lived without a brain, but until his death he was not only conscious, but also retained sound thinking.
An equally sensational fact was presented in a report by doctors Jan Bruel and George Albee in 1957 before the American Psychological Association. They spoke about their operation, during which the entire right hemisphere of the brain was completely removed on a 39-year-old patient. Their patient not only survived, but also fully retained his mental abilities, and they were above average.
The list of such cases could be continued. Many people after operations, head injuries, terrible injuries continued to live, move and think without a significant part of the brain. What helps them to maintain a sound mind and, in some cases, even efficiency?
Relatively recently, American scientists announced the discovery of a “third brain” in humans. In addition to the brain and spinal cord, they also found the so-called "abdominal brain", represented by an accumulation of nervous tissue on the inside of the esophagus and stomach. According to New York City Research Center professor Michael Gershon, this "belly brain" has more than 100 million neurons, more than even the spinal cord.
American researchers believe that it is the “abdominal brain” that gives the command to release hormones in case of danger, pushes a person either to fight or flee. According to scientists, this third “administrative center” remembers information, is able to accumulate life experience, affects our mood and well-being. Maybe it is in the “abdominal brain” that the key to the rational behavior of decapitated bodies lies?
Still chopping heads
Alas, no abdominal brain will still allow them to live without a head, and they are still cut down, even for princesses ... It would seem that beheading, as a form of execution, has long sunk into oblivion, but back in the first half of the 60s. In the 20th century, it was used in the GDR, then, in 1966, the only guillotine broke and the criminals began to be shot.
But in the Middle East, you can still quite officially lose your head.
In 1980, a documentary film by the English cameraman Anthony Thomas called "The Death of a Princess" caused literally international shock. It showed the public beheading of a Saudi princess and her lover. In 1995, a record 192 people were beheaded in Saudi Arabia. After that, the number of such executions began to decrease. In 1996, 29 men and one woman were beheaded in the kingdom.
In 1997, approximately 125 people were beheaded around the world. At least as far back as 2005, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Qatar had laws allowing beheadings. It is authentically known that in Saudi Arabia a special executioner used his skills already in the new millennium.
As for criminal actions, Islamic extremists sometimes deprive people of their heads, there have been cases when the same was done in the criminal gangs of Colombian drug lords. In 2003 acquired world fame some extravagant suicidal Briton who decapitated himself with a self-built guillotine.
February 20, 2019
Orthodox Christians have the day of St. Parthenius, Bishop of Lampsaki
395- the first convent founded in Bethlehem
1431- Pope Martin V (Oddone Colonna) died
Random Joke
The priest came to the prison. Asks one prisoner. - How did you get here, my son? - My father, I was returning late in the evening from a prayer meeting. Pious tears glistened in my eyes, and I still heard the music of the pious chant. But I was so tired that I sat down on the ground for a minute and fell asleep. When I woke up, it turned out that a prison was built around me and they didn’t want to let me out!
The Creator sat on the Throne and thought. Behind Him stretched the boundless expanse of heaven, bathed in the splendor of light and colors, before Him the black night of Space rose like a wall. He rose to the very zenith like a majestic steep mountain, and His divine head shone in the sky like a distant sun...
Sabbath day. As usual, no one follows it. Nobody but our family. Sinners everywhere gather in crowds and indulge in fun. Men, women, girls, boys - they all drink wine, fight, dance, play gambling, laugh, shout, sing. And do all sorts of other nasty things...
Received the Mad Prophet today. He good man and, in my opinion, his mind is much better than his reputation. He received this nickname a very long time ago and completely undeservedly, since he simply makes predictions, and does not prophesy. He doesn't claim to be. He makes his predictions based on history and statistics...
The first day of the fourth month of the year 747 from the beginning of the world. Today I am 60 years old, for I was born in the year 687 from the beginning of the world. My relatives came to me and begged me to marry, so that our family would not be cut off. I am still young to take such care upon myself, although I know that my father Enoch, and my grandfather Jared, and my great-grandfather Maleleel, and great-great-grandfather Cainan, all entered into marriage at the age that I reached on this day ...
Another discovery. Once I noticed that William McKinley looked very sick. This is the very first lion, and from the very beginning I became very attached to him. I examined the poor man, looking for the cause of his ailment, and found that he had an unchewed head of cabbage stuck in his throat. I couldn't get it out, so I took a broom stick and pushed it in...
... Love, peace, peace, endless quiet joy - this is how we knew life in the Garden of Eden. Living was a pleasure. The passing time left no traces - no suffering, no decrepitude; sickness, sorrow, worries had no place in Eden. They hid behind its fence, but they could not penetrate it ...
I'm almost a day old. I showed up yesterday. So, anyway, it seems to me. And, probably, this is exactly so, because, if it was the day before yesterday, I did not exist then, otherwise I would remember it. It is possible, however, that I simply did not notice when it was the day before yesterday, although it was ...
This new creature long hair I'm very bored. It sticks out in front of my eyes all the time and follows me on my heels. I don't like it at all: I'm not used to society. Go to other animals...
Dagestanis - a term for peoples who originally live in Dagestan. There are about 30 peoples in Dagestan and ethnographic groups. In addition to Russians, Azerbaijanis and Chechens, who make up a large proportion of the population of the republic, these are Avars, Dargins, Kumti, Lezgins, Laks, Tabasarans, Nogais, Rutuls, Aguls, Tats, and others.
Circassians (self-designation - Adyge) - people in Karachay-Cherkessia. In Turkey and other countries of Western Asia, Circassians are also called all immigrants from the North. Caucasus. Believers are Sunni Muslims. The Kabardino-Circassian language belongs to the Caucasian (Iberian-Caucasian) languages (Abkhazian-Adyghe group). Writing based on the Russian alphabet.
Back in the 19th and early 20th centuries, execution was considered a preferable punishment compared to prison, because being in custody turned out to be a slow death. Being in prison was paid by relatives, and they themselves often asked that the perpetrator be killed.
They didn’t keep convicts in prisons - it was too expensive. If relatives had money, then they could take their loved one for maintenance (usually he sat in an earthen pit). But a tiny part of society was able to afford it.
Therefore, the main method of punishment for minor crimes (theft, insulting an official, etc.) were stocks. The most common type of block is "kanga" (or "jia"). It was used very widely, since it did not require the state to build a prison, and also prevented the escape.
Sometimes, in order to further reduce the cost of punishment, several prisoners were chained into this neck block. But even in this case, relatives or compassionate people had to feed the criminal.
Each judge considered it his duty to invent his own reprisals against criminals and prisoners. The most common were: sawing off the foot (first they sawed off one foot, the second time the recidivist caught the other), removal of the kneecaps, cutting off the nose, cutting off the ears, branding.
In an effort to make the punishment heavier, the judges invented the execution, which was called "carry out five types of punishments." The offender should have been branded, cut off his arms or legs, beaten to death with sticks, and put his head on the market for all to see.
In the Chinese tradition, beheading was considered a more severe form of execution than strangulation, despite the fact that strangulation is characterized by prolonged torment.
The Chinese believed that the body of a person is a gift from his parents, and therefore it is extremely disrespectful to the ancestors to return a dismembered body to oblivion. Therefore, at the request of relatives, and more often for a bribe, other types of executions were used.
strangulation. The offender was tied to a pole, a rope was wrapped around his neck, the ends of which were in the hands of the executioners. They slowly twist the rope with special sticks, gradually strangling the convict.
The strangulation could last for a very long time, as the executioners at times loosened the rope and allowed the almost strangled victim to take a few convulsive breaths, and then tightened the noose again.
"Cage", or "standing blocks" (Li-chia) - the device for this execution is a neck block, which was fixed on top of bamboo or wooden poles woven into a cage, at a height of about 2 meters. The convict was placed in a cage, and bricks or tiles were placed under his feet, then they were slowly removed.
The executioner removed the bricks, and the man hung with his neck clamped in a block, which began to choke him, this could go on for months until all the supports were removed.
Ling-Chi - "death by a thousand cuts" or "stings of a sea pike" - the most terrible execution by cutting off small pieces from the victim's body for a long period of time.
Such an execution followed high treason and parricide. Ling-chi was performed in order to intimidate in public places with a large crowd of onlookers.
For capital crimes and other serious offenses, there were 6 classes of punishment. The first was called lin-chi. This punishment was applied to traitors, parricides, murderers of brothers, husbands, uncles and mentors.
The offender was tied to a cross and cut into either 120, or 72, or 36, or 24 pieces. In the presence of extenuating circumstances, his body, as a sign of imperial favor, was cut into only 8 pieces.
The offender was cut into 24 pieces as follows: 1 and 2 blows cut off the eyebrows; 3 and 4 - shoulders; 5 and 6 - mammary glands; 7 and 8 - muscles of the hands between the hand and the elbow; 9 and 10 - muscles of the arms between the elbow and shoulder; 11 and 12 - flesh from the thighs; 13 and 14 - calves of the legs; 15 - they pierced the heart with a blow; 16 - cut off the head; 17 and 18 - hands; 19 and 20 - the remaining parts of the hands; 21 and 22 - feet; 23 and 24 - legs. They cut it into 8 pieces like this: 1 and 2 cut off the eyebrows with blows; 3 and 4 - shoulders; 5 and 6 - mammary glands; 7 - they pierced the heart with a blow; 8 - cut off the head.
But there was a way to avoid these monstrous types of execution - for a large bribe. For a very large bribe, the jailer could give a criminal awaiting death in an earthen pit a knife or even poison. But it is clear that few could afford such expenses.
In the Middle Ages, execution was very common in the form of cutting off the head from the body with an ax, and later with the help of a guillotine apparatus. As a physician, I was interested in the physiological side of the consequences of cutting off the head from the body. At the same time, rather large vessels supplying the head with blood are crossed: two carotid arteries and two vertebral arteries. Can a person perform reasonable actions for 20 - 30 seconds after the separation of the head from the body, until he completely loses blood and physically weakens? Can a person transmit an action command from the brain to the spinal cord and then consciously carry out some reasonable actions for half a minute? Medicine claims that “no”, without a head a person instantly loses the ability to act rationally. Some historical facts reject the seemingly unshakable and indisputable statements of world medicine. A chicken can run around with its head cut off for several minutes. And the man? The most common type of execution in the Middle Ages in Europe was the execution in the form of beheading.
A person sentenced to death was bent over an oak block, and the executioner cut off his head with a huge ax or sword. For example, in 1336, King Ludwig of Bavaria sentenced nobleman Dean von Schauberg and four of his relatives to death for an attempt on his life. Von Schauberg asked that four of his relatives be left alive if, after cutting off his head, he gets up and walks a few steps. The execution took place in the middle of a flat green meadow, in the middle of which they placed a huge oak log, on which the head of Dean von Schauberg was cut off. According to historical chronicle, after cutting off his head, he walked 40 steps across the meadow.
In 1528, in the German city of Raustade, the monk Krause was beheaded by the Inquisition for heresy. Before the execution, the monk prayed frantically and asked the Lord to accept his sinful soul. After cutting off his head, he fell on his back, crossed himself with his right hand, crossed his arms over his chest, and only then died.
In 1527, King Henry VIII of England sentenced both husband and wife, Isolde and Thomas Kambal, to execution. Thomas was very fond of his beautiful Isolde, and saved his wife from execution by sacrificing himself. Standing on the scaffold, in the middle of the city square, in front of a huge number of citizens, Thomas asked the monarch to have mercy on his wife if he ran to the edge of the platform without a head. King Henry VIII of England agreed to the condition, and in front of all the assembled people and courtiers, he gave his royal honestly pardon Iseult Kemble if a headless husband can even touch the edge of the platform with his finger. He reasoned in the same way as most modern doctors: a person is not able to run in the right direction without a head, that is, he cannot think and act correctly.
The wooden dais in the town square, where people were often beheaded in those days, was made in the form of a square with sides measuring six meters wide and the same length. A huge wooden block, on the surface of which the executioner chopped off his head with a very heavy and very sharp ax, was exactly in the middle of this wooden platform. Consequently, Sir Thomas Kambal, after cutting off his head, had to get up from his knees and run three meters to the border of the wooden platform. healthy and strong man did the impossible. He got up headless from his knees, and along the boardwalk ran to the edge of the scaffold and fell down from it, fell to the ground dead. A titanic willpower was manifested, caused by the love of this man for his wife! In order to perpetuate this overly strong but unhappy love, in order for modern medicine to change scientific beliefs in relation to the exclusive role of the brain in the manifestation of intelligent actions, the author of this article will now describe this historical event in detail. Let's start by explaining the reason for the execution of the young Kambal couple.
Henry VIII was the youngest son of Henry VII, the first Tudor king of England. His older brother, Prince Arthur, was a frail and sickly man. In November 1501, Arthur married the Aragonese (Spanish) princess Catherine, but due to illness he could not fulfill his conjugal duty, Catherine did not give birth to a child. Bedridden, Arthur coughed all the time, languished in a fever, and finally died in April 1502. Symptoms of the disease indicate the presence of pulmonary tuberculosis in this royal offspring. The young widow of Prince Arthur remained to live in London. In 1505, an agreement was reached between the English and Spanish courts that Catherine would remarry her younger brother Henry when he was 15 years old. Reinforcing this agreement, Pope Julius II signed a document (dispensation), where he favorably gave permission for Catherine's remarriage. In April 1509, Henry VII died, and in June his son Henry VIII married Catherine. Young Henry had flourishing health, was excellently built, was considered an excellent rider and a first-class archer. From the first days of his reign, balls, masquerades, knightly tournaments were held at the huge court.
Queen Catherine during the years of her marriage was pregnant several times, but managed to give birth in 1516 to only one healthy girl, named Mary. The queen suffered from numerous female diseases that medieval medicine could not cure, and which made sexual intercourse painful. Having lived 10 years in marriage, the king still did not have an heir to the throne. This worried the English monarch very much, and since the sick wife was to blame for everything, royal family scandals began to flare up, which every year became stronger and stronger. Gradually, a deep enmity arose between the spouses. From 1524, Henry ceased to share a bed with his wife. The king began numerous romance novels, and Catherine took up the affairs of church piety and charity.
In March 1524, at the next ball, Henry saw a beautiful couple dancing. A tall and stately man danced with a very beautiful woman, whose head was decorated with long blond hair. From his court ladies, the king learned that Sir Thomas Kemble and his wife Iseult were dancing in front of his throne. The woman was truly very beautiful and stately. Thomas Kemble came from a poor background noble family, lived quietly and happily, from his marriage to Isolde had a pretty blond daughter of four years. Watching you dance and be happy young couple, King Henry seemed to reflect on his unhappy family life. There is wealth, there is more than enough power, but there is no love and real human happiness. For this reason, Heinrich drank a lot of wine at the ball, was gloomy and even embittered. Suddenly a seditious thought dawned on him. He called his cardinal Thomas Wolsey aside and asked sullenly.
I have unlimited power. I am the king of England. So? So! Tomorrow I want to sleep with this beauty! Take the soldiers, steal Isolde and hide her in the nearest nunnery!
This is a crime, my king. She married woman! the cardinal tried to object.
What? You will cross me! - the king shouted to the whole hall. - If tomorrow you do not follow the order - you are no longer a cardinal! I went to bed. I'll be waiting for you with a report by lunchtime.
So in one minute the king broke the fate of two beautiful people. As the Camballs' horse-drawn carriage was driving down the dark road home from the royal ball, they were attacked by "unknown robbers", and while Sir Campbell was fighting an unequal sword fight, the robbers kidnapped his beloved wife. Wounded Thomas Kemble arrived home, quickly recovered and began to search for his wife. Isolde for two years (1524-1527) was imprisoned in one of the comfortable, luxurious "cellars" of the convent, not far from London. For two years she became the king's secret mistress. When the king desired love pleasures, he went hunting. After a short hunt, Henry left the court retinue accompanying him, and with several security officers rode on horseback towards the convent. Soon, Isolde gave birth to a boy, Charles, from the king. The king began to hatch more serious plans, began to think about marrying his captive. Henry began to discuss with the cardinal a plan to divorce the queen. But fate has prepared tragic ending this story.
Thomas Kemble guessed that the king was to blame for the kidnapping of his beautiful wife. In 1527, for a lot of money, he learned from the king's courtiers that he often leaves somewhere in the suburbs of the capital. More than a week passed before Kemble tracked the king's path from the hunting ground to the nunnery. He immediately realized that the king had made Iseult his mistress. Kemball's desire to quickly meet his beloved was so great that he decided that same evening to storm the monastery. The king rode to the monastery with only two guard officers. Sir Kambal had four armed assistants. They advised that the release of Iseult should begin after the king and his guards had left. But Thomas Kemble was filled with wild jealousy and a thirst for revenge. Kemble planned to attack the monastery at night, tie up two guards, quickly run into the bedroom, be sure to pierce the hated king of England with his sword. After that, it was necessary to get to the sea on horseback with Isolde during the night, and leave England by ship.
But as the scripture says: "Man proposes, but God disposes." Unfortunately, his plan came true "only partially." It was not possible to tie up the guards, they distinguished themselves by their vigilance, they were professional soldiers who were proficient in weapons, so they put up fierce armed resistance. While four friends fought with swords with the guards, Sir Thomas Kemble ran into his wife's bedroom, covered with expensive carpets. A few seconds before, having heard a loud noise, the king ran into another room and also armed himself with a sword and dagger, and did not allow Thomas to quickly kill himself. During the battle, Thomas badly injured the king. Heinrich had deep wounds on his stomach, arms and especially on his legs, after which he limped until his death. But the most unpleasant thing for the king's pride was that during the battle Iseult screamed piercingly:
Thomas, dear, kill that fat bastard! Kill me please!
In addition, Isolde picked up a tall bronze candlestick, and with its heavy base, tried several times to hit the king on the head. But the king miraculously managed to deviate. At that moment, the king of England realized that Iseult hated him fiercely, and was submissive only because of her desperate situation.
Further events began to develop not in favor of the attackers. Men and women began to run up to the noise, several more guards jumped out of the darkness, who belonged to the retinue of the king. Therefore, the four friends of Thomas Camball were forced to leave the building of the monastery and gallop away on horseback to the nearest forest. Armed people at the same moment ran to the aid of the king. Thomas Kambal lacked one or two minutes to deal with his opponent. Several sharp swords pressed to his throat forced Thomas to stop the fight and drop his sword to the floor. The guards quickly disarmed Thomas, and one of them asked the king:
My king, do you perhaps wish us to kill this man?
But the king was badly wounded, lost a lot of blood, so he did not have time to answer, lost consciousness, fell to the floor. The guards rushed to save the king's life, leaving an unarmed Thomas standing in a dark corner of the room. The officers dragged the king out of the bedroom into the corridor, carried the king's dress there as well. They closed the huge oak door of the room with several locks and set up heavy guards. Thomas and Isolde Kambal were both imprisoned in the basement for several days. The king needed urgent medical attention. The guards dressed him, loaded him into a carriage and quickly brought him to the palace. The king was unconscious for two days. When the king recovered from his wounds and learned that two captives were awaiting their fate in the basement of the convent, he ordered that their heads be cut off for high treason and an attempt on the life of a crowned person. The execution was appointed in a week, when the king's health improved, and without fail in the central square of the city, in front of all the free citizens. The king was shocked by Iseult's betrayal, because he planned to make her queen of England, and after two years of his love, she was filled with a desire to kill him. Therefore, the king wanted to be sure to attend the intrigues of "a traitor and her husband - a robber and a thug." The king did not see and did not admit his guilt in all this tragedy.
The execution took place on a clear sunny morning. The king and his retinue positioned themselves as close as possible to the boardwalk. The courtiers understood the injustice of the events being committed, so they whispered quietly. A beautiful, but doomed to death, couple of Kambalov descended from the horse-drawn cart, which the soldiers escorted to the center of the scaffold, where the executioner with a huge ax was already standing. Thomas and Iseult held hands and proudly looked at what was happening. The judge read to all present the verdict: the death penalty for high treason and for the attempt on the life of King Henry VIII of England. Suddenly the voice of Sir Thomas Camball boomed out of the silence:
- Will the king deign to give life to my wife if I run without a head to the edge of this plank platform?
The king jumped in surprise. He thought about the proposal for a minute, looking unblinkingly into the eyes of the man who had tried to kill him a week before. Anger at Kambal made the king grit his teeth. Without averting his hated gaze from his recent adversary, the king said loudly:
I'm interested in this offer, Kambal. I was present at hundreds of executions, but no one made such an offer to me…………. Cardinal, do you think a man can run three meters without a head?
The king's heavy gaze was slowly transferred to the face of the cardinal standing next to him. The Cardinal thought for a moment and slowly replied:
I very……… I doubt it, sir. A man can't do that, sir! Definitely can't!
Well, I accept your funny offer, Thomas Kemble! - answered the king - Have you heard everything? A woman is not to be executed, not to be released from all four sides, if her headless husband runs to the edge of the platform. The life of your beloved wife is in your hands, Kemble. Now take my throne to the edge of the platform where you must run, Camball, without your head. If even your little finger dangles from the edge of this board, then your wife will live! Executioner, come on!
Thomas Kemble turned to face the executioner and said:
I will lie down on the deck, concentrate, and when I shout and lower my hand, then slash with all my might.
Not the first year I have been working, sir, - the tall and broad-shouldered executioner answered embarrassedly.
Thomas Kemble kissed his wife, who was numb from what was happening and had long said goodbye to life, firmly, then resolutely laid his neck on a huge wooden block and raised his hand above his head. The executioner raised a huge ax above his head and froze in anticipation. Everyone present at the execution held their breath and waited for Thomas' next move. Thomas tensed, his face reddened, his forehead sweaty, his arm raised above his head trembling slightly. King Henry got up from his chair from the tension. When everyone began to think that the pause was dragging on, the hand dropped sharply down, and Thomas's heartbreaking cry was heard:
Ruby, I'm ready………
At the same moment, Thomas's head rolled on the boards. But to the amazement of everyone present, Thomas' torso rose and quickly ran to the edge of the platform. Blood was ejected from the neck arteries. But the headless Thomas continued to run until the body fell from the high scaffold directly onto the king, spattering him with blood and crushing him with his weight. The courtiers helped the king to get up from the ground. From what they saw, the king’s hands and legs trembled, did not obey, so he was seated on the throne, and the officers had to bring the king to his senses for a long time, splashing water in his face. From that moment on, night terrors began to visit the king, he began to scream in his sleep, and his body began to rapidly gain weight. The townspeople present began to be baptized and quickly left the place of execution. Several court ladies fainted.
For Isolde, everything that happened seemed like a heavy dream. She silently watched her husband's execution with wide eyes. She didn't faint, but her chic Brown hair became gray all over. She looked with hatred into the eyes of the king who had regained consciousness and, meeting his gaze, whispered through her teeth:
Damn you!
Then she went up to the severed head of her husband, picked it up, carefully put it in the apron of her expensive black dress, slowly descended the scaffold stairs and began to leave the square. Heinrich looked after her for a long time, and when some officer wanted to stop her and blocked the way, Heinrich languidly waved his hand "let him go, do not touch." It is known that a day later, Iseult Kemble, together with her daughter, born from Thomas Kemble, and the boy Charles, born from Henry VIII, sailed on a ship to France. Further fate Iseult Kemble is unknown.
Iseult's curse came true. The king destroyed such a beautiful love, and for this the gods severely punished him. Henry VIII was absolutely unhappy in his personal and family life. In 1527, he became very interested in the ladies-in-waiting Anne Boleyn. Then he gave Cardinal Wolsey a responsible assignment: under a plausible pretext, to enable him to dissolve the marriage with Catherine and marry Anna. But Pope Clement VII did not even want to hear about the divorce and refused his blessing. Henry dismissed his cardinal Wolsey, who did not comply with the divorce order, and appointed a new cardinal - Cromwell. He gave him sly advice. Why shouldn't the English king get out of the ecclesiastical authority of Rome and declare himself the head of the national church? Then the English king could divorce his wives without the consent of the pope. Henry followed the advice of Cardinal Cromwell and in May 1533 declared the marriage to Catherine of Aragon invalid. A few days later, Heinrich married Anna Bohlen. But Anna's behavior immediately after the wedding was "far from reproachful." Soon, Henry convicted the queen of treason, and an investigating commission of 12 peers found the queen "guilty of treason" and decided to execute her. Queen Anne was beheaded on 20 May 1534 at the same spot where Thomas Camball was executed.
The day after the execution, Henry married Jane Seymour, whom he had dated for one year until that moment. She was a quiet, meek, submissive girl, but in October 1537 she died, giving birth to the king's son Edward. Henry's fourth wife was Anna, daughter of the German Duke of Cleves. Anna turned out to be not only a fanatical Catholic, but also ardent opponent sexual life. Heinrich was followed by a sharp disappointment in his wife, and soon the marriage with Anna of Klevskaya was declared invalid.
By this time, the king had a new favorite - Catherine Gotward, who was 30 years younger than the king. Katherine led a dissolute life. Heinrich was warned about this, but he was captivated by love pleasures, and did not heed the wise advice of the courtiers. The wedding still took place. Soon the king began to report on the almost undisguised and numerous infidelities of the young wife. At a meeting of the Council, which sentenced the queen to death, Henry sobbed from resentment - he was catastrophically unlucky in family life, his wife deceived him again. In early February 1542, Catherine Gotward was beheaded in the Tower.
Six months later, Henry married for the sixth time to a thirty-year-old widow, Catherine Parr. Unfortunately, Catherine Parr was too preoccupied with religious disputes, and she strongly expressed her religious views, which contradicted those of the king. This liberty nearly cost her her life. A decree was prepared on the next execution of the queen, but in 1547 the king died suddenly, before he could sign the death warrant. Heinrich's illness was the result of monstrous obesity. Five years before his death, he was unable to move on his own. He was taken to the hall by the courtiers in a chair on wheels. Modern English doctors claim that obesity came as a result of hormonal dysfunction, which came from previous excessively strong nervous stress. Apparently, the execution of Thomas Kambal became for the monarch that fatal stress that led him to rapid obesity and death.
