For an essay on the topic “Fidelity and betrayal in love, the love sphere”, you can take such a novel as Tolstoy’s “War and Peace”. In this novel we find at once several examples of both outstanding fidelity and shameful betrayal.
Take the relationship between Pierre Bezukhov and Helen Kuragina. Pierre - bright soul the man fell in love with Helen, and since he always did everything thoroughly from the bottom of his heart, his love was pure and true. The very word treason for Pierre was a kind of incident, about which he believed that he would never meet him in his life.
But Ellen was different. It was a beautiful but empty soul, for which the concept of fidelity did not exist at all in this world. She initially treated Pierre not as a husband, but as a way to achieve material wealth, to a way to fulfill their ambitious plans. And so betrayal followed one after another.
Pierre suffered severely when he realized that this creature did not need his love, he tried to fight, but it was a fight only with his feelings, with his own loyalty and moral principles. In fact, their marriage was initially doomed to failure, because Helen did not understand pure love, and hence fidelity, and betrayal did not attach any role.
Fidelity could not resist betrayal and Pierre and Helen broke up.
Therefore, fidelity can become a gift from God only if both people keep fidelity in love, but if at least one surrenders to the will of betrayal, fidelity also dies, along with love.
Unified State Examination 2018 Theme essay on literature "Loyalty and treason" in the love sphere. Arguments and examples from works. Text conflict
At all times, the topic of loyalty and love was raised by almost everyone who knew how to hold a pen in his hand. This topic can be revealed using such works as Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy (she fell in love with another and realized that she could not live with her husband. Cheating on her husband, love for Vronsky). War and Peace is full of both loyalty and treason. True, "War and Peace" is a very extensive work, many read it selectively - either only about love, or only about war. Or take Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.
A love that is not afraid of even death. Juliet dies consciously, realizing that there is no loved one nearby. I would consider the theme of loyalty and betrayal, taking as a basis the works of Alexandre Dumas. He has, what is not a work, then loyalty and treason (“The Count of Monte Cristo”, for example). The works of Pushkin (Eugene Onegin), Lermontov (Hero of Our Time), Ostrovsky (Thunderstorm), Bulgakov (Master and Margarita) and many many others will show what loyalty is and what treason is.
On the example of which works to write an essay on the topic "Fidelity and betrayal" in the love sphere
Difficult to find in fiction a work that somehow would not affect the theme of love. And where there is love, there is loyalty or betrayal. Therefore, the material for writing on the topic of fidelity and betrayal is very rich and varied.
Let's take Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" as an example. Two bright images- Bazarov and Odintsova. In the work there is no betrayal in the generally accepted sense, but there is infidelity in the sense of the inconstancy of feelings, the inability to take responsibility for the life of another person.
Odintsova's love is not real, superficial. There is nothing to say about fidelity when there is no sincere feelings, therefore, she betrays, first of all, not Bazarov, but love itself as a human ability to become firmly attached, accept another person with all her heart and give herself without a trace.
For an essay on the topic of loyalty and betrayal in the love sphere, I would take several works that very clearly show the conflict of loyalty and betrayal in the soul. This is very famous works, they represent a very clear understanding of these concepts. You have read them all and know that this is Anna Karenina from novel of the same name and Katerina from Ostrovsky Groza.
As an opposite version of treason, I would take the story Old World Landowners, where an example of fidelity to death is very clearly shown.
Arguments for the final essay and composition.
Arguments to the direction of "loyalty and betrayal". M.Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time". Part 1.
"There are many beauties in our villages,
The stars shine in the darkness of their eyes.
It is sweet to love them, an enviable share;
But valiant will is more fun.
Gold will buy four wives,
The dashing horse has no price:
He will not lag behind the whirlwind in the steppe,
He won't change, he won't cheat."
For Kazbich, the loss of a friend was a huge tragedy. When Azamat stole Karagez, the dashing Circassian was inconsolable: "... fell to the ground and sobbed like a child." So he lay "until late at night and all night ..". Kazbich's relationship to his horse - a prime example mutual devotion of man and animal.
Do you always have to be true to your principles?
Loyalty to oneself and one's principles is considered a positive quality, but a person who never changes his ideas about life and people is static, he limits himself. The protagonist of the novel M.Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time" strong personality with a strong-willed character, a person true to himself. This quality plays with him bad joke. Unable to change his ideas about life, he is looking for a catch in everything: he does not believe in friendship, considering it a weakness, and perceives love only as the satisfaction of his pride. Throughout the novel, we see how the hero tries to understand the meaning of life, to find his destiny, but finds only disappointment. The reason for the disappointment is Pechorin's immunity to the feelings of other people, he cannot forgive them for their weaknesses and open his soul, he is afraid to seem ridiculous to others and even to himself. In the chapter “Princess Mary”, we see how hard Grigory is going through the departure of his beloved woman, he rushes after her, but his horse dies on the road, and he, exhausted, falls to the ground and cries. At this moment, we understand how deeply the hero is able to feel, but even in such a situation, he thinks he looks pathetic. By morning, he returns to his usual state and attributes the manifestation of humanity to frustrated nerves. Analyzing the behavior of the protagonist of the work, we can conclude that loyalty to one's principles is positive qualities only in a situation where these principles are dictated by philanthropy, and not selfishness. A person must be open to something new, be able to recognize the fallacy of his judgments. Only this will allow a person to become best version himself.
Betrayal towards people who trusted you.
The theme of betrayal is reflected in Lermontov's novel A Hero of Our Time. So, main character Pechorin is a person who cannot be relied upon. He betrays everyone who had the imprudence to trust him. Comrade Grushnitsky revealed his soul to him, told him that he was secretly in love with Mary, turned to Pechorin for advice, considering him his friend. Pechorin did not dissuade him, but vilely took advantage of Grushnitsky's openness. Pechorin was annoyed by the young cadet. He did not wish him happiness, on the contrary, he dreamed of seeing him in a wounded state, ridiculed him, belittled him in the eyes of Mary, a, at the end In the end, out of boredom, he decided to seduce his "friend's" beloved. Pechorin needed Mary to annoy Grushnitsky. Such behavior can be called vile, it deserves only condemnation. It doesn’t matter whether Pechorin Grushnitsky considered his friend or not, he had no right to do this with a person who trusted him.
Pechorin's betrayal of Vera/Vera's loyalty.
Vera sacrificed herself for the sake of Pechorin, abandoned family happiness, and risked losing her reputation. In the depths of her soul, she hoped for their eventual happiness. Pechorin's betrayal consisted in the fact that he accepted this sacrifice, but did not give anything in return. When his beloved woman was going through difficult moments, he was not there, he dragged after Mary, whom he did not even love. Pechorin betrayed the only person who truly loved him and accepted him for who he was. He used it "as a source of joys and anxieties, without which life is boring and monotonous." Vera understood this, but sacrificed herself, hoping that one day he would appreciate this sacrifice. For Vera, Gregory was everything, while for Pechorin she was just an episode, important, but not the only one. Disappointment awaited her, because a person capable of spiritual betrayal cannot bring happiness.
Pechorin's betrayal towards Bela.
The theme of spiritual betrayal is revealed in the novel by M.Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time". So, Grigory Pechorin once meets unusual girl Bel. She captivates him with her beauty and mystery, so Pechorin decides to steal her. Bela initially resists, but then she herself falls in love with the "thief". Her loyalty to her beloved knows no bounds. She is willing to give up her home, family and traditions to be with her loved one. Pechorin becomes bored over time. He comes to the conclusion that all women are the same, and is no longer happy with the love that Bela gives him. He does not cheat on her physically, but in his heart he refuses her, dreaming of travel. The girl understands this, but cannot leave Gregory, because she is true to her choice. Even before her death, she only cares that they cannot be together in heaven, because Bela belongs to a different faith. From the relationship between Bela and Pechorin, we can conclude that the worst betrayal is not associated with external manifestations, it is deep inside a person, but can do much more harm. Spiritual betrayal hurts just like physical betrayal, sometimes even more.
Treason of the Faith (marriage without love).
People are changing different reasons, but most often betrayal happens when people do not marry for love. Such an example can be seen in the novel by M.Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time". One of the main characters Vera marries an unloved person, therefore, having met true love, cheating on his spouse. Vera cares little about the feelings of her unloved husband; she does not consider herself obliged to be faithful to him. The novel does not tell what circumstances forced her to marry, but it led to the misfortune of both spouses. Living with an unloved person is unbearable, but even worse is the one who is being deceived.
Setting goals, a person strives with all his might to achieve them, sometimes forgetting that not all means are good for getting. desired result. Often the result does not justify the efforts invested in it, and sometimes the methods used are too small and cruel. One way or another, the question of how these two categories correlate in the minds and actions of people has been of concern to many writers since ancient times, one of which is M.Yu. Lermontov. We will bring literary argument in the direction of "Aims and Means" from the novel "A Hero of Our Time".
- One of the main problems of the novel "A Hero of Our Time" and its characters is the choice of decoys and their relationship with inner world heroes. Grigory Pechorin spends his whole life in desperate attempts to realize the main goal own life, in the search and acquisition of which he hopes to know happiness. However, a restless, idle existence with its momentary achievements and victories makes him extra person unable to find true joy. Wanting to dispel boredom, he unwittingly, and sometimes intentionally, torments and destroys other people. Using all possible means, he, as a rule, quickly achieves what he wants, but later completely loses interest in the dream. The tragedy of Grigory Alexandrovich is in his inability to distinguish the real goal from the false one, which leads to disappointment and suffering of the hero himself and those who are close to him.
- In the chapter "Princess Mary" we meet Grushnitsky, Pechorin's friend. Juncker longs to be promoted by ingratiating himself secular society. The hero is vain and painfully proud, therefore the main objective for him - to get recognition in the eyes of other people. He longs for a promotion to impress the heart of the girl he's in love with. But even such a goal ultimately becomes in vain, because it convinces the reader of the impossibility of winning love with status and high position. Grushnitsky is disappointed and angry at Pechorin, because he became the unwitting cause of his love defeat. The hero decides to take revenge on his friend, but even here he makes a mistake in choosing the means, being a victim, not a winner. Not all methods can help a person achieve a goal, and no goal is worth committing a vile and base act.
- Sometimes the reasons human actions are impulsive in nature, explained by the thirst for possession of something, not associated with the achievement of external benefits or internal spiritual search. Such is Kazbich - one of the heroes of the novel. Courage and bravery coexist in him with vindictiveness and cruelty. He is stingy with the manifestations of feelings. The only true friend for him is the horse Karagyoz, which Kazbich is proud of and highly appreciates. So high that he does not agree to exchange it even for the love of a beautiful Circassian woman. Deceived by Pechorin and Azamat, Kazbich sets himself the goal of restoring his desecrated dignity and taking revenge on the offenders. Kazbich considers the murder of Bela, Pechorin's beloved, to be quite a fair price for the stolen horse. The goal of the hero is explained by the desire for revenge for an unfair offense, but the death of an innocent girl is too harsh a means of restoring justice.
- Azamat is another hero of the novel, whose goal turns out to be incomparable with the means used to achieve it. Passionately wanting to get Kazbich's horse, the young man is ready to give a lot to get him, including kidnapping his sister, giving her into the possession of the first person he meets. The selfish goal of acquiring what he wants makes the boy commit a treacherous act, disgrace his family, and run away from home. To achieve such an insignificant goal, betrayal turns out to be an unacceptable means, because Azamat loses the most precious thing he has, while gaining little in return.
- The real high purpose there can be no unworthy means, because sincere impulses are born only in a noble and compassionate heart. Bela is the heroine of the novel, a young Circassian living according to the laws of a familiar natural world, alien to meanness and betrayal. Kidnapped by Pechorin, she sincerely falls in love with the hero, thereby abandoning her former carefree life, from everything familiar and homely. To stay with Gregory for Bela means losing family, home, friends, devoting his whole life to his beloved. The girl boldly trusts herself and her future to Pechorin, because she is confident in her feelings for him. Fear is alien to her, she is ready to be with the hero on any terms in order to ensure his happiness. Her goal is to love and create comfort for her beloved. To give joy, to give without demanding anything in return is Bela's main need, in which she manifests herself as a woman of high morals, capable of a genuine feeling, devoid of selfishness.
Interesting? Save it on your wall!
The main character of the novel "A Hero of Our Time" is Grigory Pechorin, an officer who grew up in rich family. He is young, good-looking, possesses sharp mind and a sense of humor - girls cannot help but love such a character. According to the plot of the work, Pechorin has several novels - with Princess Mary Ligovskaya, Circassian Bela, but main woman in his life is Faith.
Pechorin's romance with Vera has been going on since youth - either fading, or flaring up with new passion. She understands the hero's soul like no other, allowing him to leave every time, tormented by jealousy, but not blaming him. Her attitude towards Pechorin is clearly read in a letter written before leaving.
Vera is married for the second time - she is ready to cheat on both husbands for the sake of her love. Her character is similar to the character of Gregory in its duality: smart, insightful, married to an old man of convenience, Vera is weak in front of Pechorin, becoming careless and enthusiastic. She is either strong and ready for self-sacrifice for the sake of the happiness of her beloved, or she is completely devoid of this strength. The lack of pride and dignity of a woman does not prevent her from loving devotedly and passionately.
The hero himself describes Pechorin’s attitude in his diary: “I never became a slave to my beloved woman; on the contrary, I have always acquired an invincible power over their will and heart, without even trying about it. These words were not written specifically about Vera, but they clearly reflect feelings for her. No matter how hard Vera tries to reveal the soul of her beloved, she cannot understand: no one is capable of this. In the character of Pechorin - a complete rejection of love, reciprocity and self-giving for the sake of another person.
For Pechorin, Vera is not special woman- but she follows him inexorably for many years; fate brings them together again and again. A failed attempt at an affair with Grigory Alexandrovich does not push the woman away from him; the meeting in Pyatigorsk shows how easily and carelessly Vera again entrusts herself to him.
Upon learning of Pechorin's duel with Grushnitsky, Vera breaks down and tells her husband about her feelings for the officer. He decides to take her away, and before leaving, the woman writes a letter to Grigory Alexandrovich, where her attitude is revealed: “... in your nature there is something special, peculiar to you alone, something proud and mysterious; in your voice, no matter what you say, there is an invincible power; no one knows how to constantly want to be loved; in no one is evil so attractive ... ". Vera's love for Pechorin is more of a painful addiction than blind adoration.
The relationship between Vera and Pechorin is based on mystery, passion and some indifference on the one hand and sacrifice, confusion on the other. Vera romanticizes this situation, but Pechorin realizes his affection for her only when he loses his beloved - probably forever. This emphasizes once again: the hero is not able to accept the existing happiness, he is created for eternal searches and painful, but proud loneliness.
A short essay-reasoning on literature on the topic: Fate in the novel "A Hero of Our Time"
The theme of fate in Lermontov's novel is considered from two sides. On the one hand, Pechorin believes in his special tragic destiny, on the other hand, he claims: “As for me, I always go forward more boldly when I don’t know what awaits me.” Moreover, both are simultaneously close to the hero: his opinion on this matter changes from chapter to chapter.
The motive of fate runs through the whole novel, finding a bright denouement in the chapter "The Fatalist". Usually, answering the question: “What does fate mean for Pechorin,” they analyze only it, although before that there were cases of fate interfering in the life of the hero. He himself calls himself “an ax in the hands of fate”, believing that his pernicious influence on people is his meaning of life and purpose: “This has been my fate since childhood. Everyone read on my face signs of bad feelings, which were not there; but they were supposed - and they were born. With this phrase, he seems to explain his treacherous attitude towards Bella, the game with Mary's feelings, the barbs against Grushnitsky and the murder of him. Pechorin tests people around him to confirm his idea that he is being pursued by evil fate. It begins to seem to the hero that he cannot get away from this anywhere, and in the chapter "The Fatalist" he has three whole chances to understand himself and gain a more correct understanding of fate. Lermontov deliberately recreates several different cases, rather controversial, such that it becomes completely incomprehensible whether this is luck or, indeed, fate.
In a dispute with Vulich, Pechorin has an ambivalent position in relation to fate, because he himself says that he sees “some terrible imprint of inevitable fate” on his face, but does not agree with a friend that a person’s fate is predetermined. Perhaps here, too, the hero is trying to convince himself that no fate exists, but life plays with him, forcing him to believe the opposite: “The proof was striking, and I, despite the fact that I laughed at our ancestors and their helpful astrology, fell involuntarily into their rut. He also says that he is used to “not rejecting anything decisively and not trusting anything blindly,” so the question remains open. But the second event follows, which assured Pechorin of the inevitability of fate even more strongly: Vulich becomes a victim of a drunken Cossack, and the “inevitable seal of fate” falls on his face, closing his eyelids forever, as the protagonist predicted. Later, Grigory again “tryes fate”, this time his own, rushing to neutralize the violent Cossack alone, and life treats him like the first time with Vulich: Pechorin gets off with a torn epaulette and emerges victorious. This time he believes that there is no predestination of his luck here, but only sober calculation and courage.
Here the position of the hero becomes clear, who does not rush to extremes, denying fatalism or, conversely, recognizing it. He believes that fate has a place in our lives, but a person can choose it himself, doing those things that he wants. Perhaps fate is not solid line, but the frequent crossroads at which we have to make our own choices? It seems that the hero adheres to the "middle" point of view, not rejecting the vicissitudes of fate, but not detracting from the merits of a person's personal choice.
Interesting? Save it on your wall!
