Nikitin E.M. Theoretical mechanics for technical schools - file n1.doc

16.03.2019

EVGENY PETROVICH NIKITIN. (1934 - 2001)

E.P. Nikitin is a specialist in the methodology of science, the theory of knowledge. Graduated from the Faculty of Philosophy of Moscow State University, since 1963 he worked at the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor philosophical sciences, since 1986 leading researcher. He developed the problems of explanation and justification, having full knowledge of both domestic and foreign studies. Created a theory scientific explanation, revealing types, structure and superstructure, as well as systems of explanations; considered the relationship between discovery and justification procedures. He showed the universality of scientific justification, involving the use of such procedures as explanation, definition, prediction, proof, etc. last years life turned to the problems of specialization and differentiation of spiritual activity. Methodologists of science are well aware of his monographs: "Explanation - the function of science" (M., 1970); "The nature of justification. Substrate analysis” (M., 1981); "Discovery and justification" (M., 1988).

L.A. Mikeshin

The following are excerpts from the monographs:

1. Nikitin E.P.Explanation is the function of science. M., 1970.

2. Nikitin E.P.Formation of the theoretical world. Ch. II I Dirty V.S., Dynin V.S., Nikitin E.P. Theory and its object. M. 1973.

Explanation is the function of science

<...>And in past history science, and now it is generally accepted that in the scientific study of any object, one of the main tasks is to give explanation of this object. But in our case, the explanation is at the same time the object of study. Thus, one of the main tasks of logical-epistemological work on the problem of explanation is to give explanation explanation(1, p. 5).

The characteristic of scientific explanation through the word "understandable" does not in the least reveal the cognitive essence of this function of science, but only gives an interpretation of the ordinary word "explanation". It may sound paradoxical, but when you try to analyze it more accurately, it turns out to be the most incomprehensible what is “understandable”. This criterion of explanation is very vague, and primarily due to the fact that explicitly or implicitly involves an appeal to purely subjective moments. What is understandable to one person (or at one time) may be completely incomprehensible to another person (or at another time). Thus, the very possibility of establishing any objective criterion for distinguishing between the explained and the unexplained is eliminated. Closely related to this interpretation is the concept of explanation.<...>To explain something means to reduce the unusual (unfamiliar) to the familiar (familiar)<...>The main flaw of these approaches to the problem is that they replace the epistemological analysis of the nature of explanation as a specific function of science with either an everyday, “everyday” interpretation of a word, or (at best) a pedagogical understanding of explanation as an interpretation, explanation (for example, the meaning of a word, a way performing some action, the rules of the game) (1, p. 7).<...>

Explanation is the disclosure of the essence of the object being explained.<...>Essence is a set of such characteristics of an object organized in a certain way, elimination (exception. - Ed.) which (each individually or all together) is tantamount to the destruction of the object. These characteristics are called essential. For a person to know a thing means to know its essence. This is true both of knowledge in general and of scientific inquiry in particular. However, an essentialist interpretation of an explanation (i.e., an interpretation of it in terms of the category "essence") may raise objections, which can be summed up in the following two:

1) the explanation in each specific case reveals either the cause, or function, or structure, or substratum (etc.) of the object, but not its essence,

2) disclosure of the essence of the object is the task of the entire process of cognition, and not just explanation (1, p. 14,15).<...>

Statement that disclosure of an entity is a task theoretical level research does not take into account the internal differentiation of this level scientific knowledge. It would be wrong to imagine this level as something completely homogeneous, amorphous, structureless. Tasks, methods, functions theoretical research very diverse and heterogeneous. Here, such cognitive functions, which are different in nature, are performed, such as unifying and interpreting, predictive and retrotelling, explanatory and normative. The unifying function is associated with the achievement of the unity of knowledge, with the construction of a single "building of science", the interpreter - with giving meaning to symbols and formalized logical and mathematical structures. Performing a predictive function Scientific research carries out the theoretical construction of objects of the future (observation or existence). Similarly, objects of the past are theoretically reconstructed in retrotelling. Finally, the task normative function consists in formulating scientifically based norms of activity (cognitive or material).

As can be seen from these brief characteristics, none of the named functions of the theoretical level of research sets as its immediate task the disclosure of the essence of the object under study. Of course, some of these functions to some extent contribute to the discovery of the essence of objects, create real prerequisites for it (unifying, interpreting), but nevertheless they do not directly have such a task before them. Other functions of theoretical research, as a rule, assume that the essence of the object has already been revealed in one way or another (predictive, normative, retropredictive).<...> The disclosure of the essence of the object being explained can be carried out only through the knowledge of its relations and connections with other entities or its internal relations and connections.(1, pp. 16-17).<...>

Relationships and se, yazi between entities and internal relationships and connections of the essence are laws.<...>Explain object - means to show that he is subject to a certain objective law or set of laws. Such is the "ontological" meaning of the explanation procedure.<...> The explanation establishes a logical connection between the display of the object being explained in the language and the law of science. Between the procedure of explanation and the law of science (which is a reflection in the mind of the law of the objective world) there is an organic necessary connection. The very knowledge of objective laws, as a rule, is caused by the need to explain some objects. The explanatory function is one of the main functions of the law of science. Apparently, any law of science has an explanatory ability in relation to those objects that obey the law of the objective world that it reflects.<...>

The law of the objective world is a universal, necessary, invariant relation, and the law of science is a reflection of this relation, and, moreover, such a reflection in which, with the help of certain cognitive means these basic characteristics of the objective law are expressed. To explain an object means to show its subordination to a certain objective law, in other words, to show that this object is lawful. And to show that an object is lawful means to demonstrate that it has attributes corresponding to all the main characteristics of the law: (1) universality, (2) necessity, (3) invariance (1, pp. 18-19).<...>

Every explanation is twofold. It is divided into two parts: a set of explanatory provisions (explanans) and provisions that reflect the object being explained (explanandum). In this regard, it is logical to assume that the specific type of any explanation will be essentially determined by at least three characteristics: (1) the nature of the esplanance, (2) the nature of the explanandum, and (3) the nature of the relationship between the explanance and the explanandum, i.e., the mechanism of explanation. Using these three essential characteristics as division bases, one can obtain, respectively, three various classifications explanations (1, p. 43).<...>

Simple genetic explanations are very often performed in the so-called. genetic sciences (sometimes they are also called "historical") - historical geology, paleontology, evolutionary theory, etc. But they play big role and in the sciences, usually not classified as genetic.

Calling genetic explanations of this type "simple", we had in mind only their relatively lesser depth compared to causal explanations.

Causal is the explanation of the object, carried out by indicating its cause and the law according to which this cause generates the object being explained. This law can be displayed as a causal and causal law of science.<...>

Researchers are often misled by the apparent irrelevance of the causal explanation to the disclosure of the essence. However, upon closer analysis, it turns out that the existence of a causal explanation not only does not refute, but, on the contrary, only confirms the essentialist interpretation of the nature of explanation. The fact is that the cause does not simply precede the effect in time and even not only "energetically" affects it. Generating a consequence, the cause in a certain sense "imprints" in it (in its essence) its nature or a separate side of its nature, i.e. not only a certain amount of movement, but also certain essential properties. Therefore, the establishment of the cause of an object can be qualified as its explanation on the grounds that the knowledge of the cause of the emergence (change) of an object to a large extent reveals its inner essence (1, p. 86).

Causal explanation is relatively simple view explanations. It reveals the essence as something "passive", "passive", produced by another object. And such a study of an object always turns out to be simpler than an analysis of its own active functioning. A causal explanation often explores an object not immanently, but “from the outside”, by indicating another, external object.<...>In the study of some object, causal explanation, precisely because of its relative simplicity, is often performed before other types of explanation and thus serves as a necessary preparatory stage for them.

The widespread occurrence of causal explanation in science has led to the emergence of a philosophical concept that absolutizes this kind of explanation, believing that "every explanation is in one sense or another a causal explanation"<...>

This concept is brought to life by certain historical circumstances. The relative simplicity and widespread use of causal explanation (especially in the early stages of the development of science) led to the fact that new types of explanation that arose with the development of knowledge began to be formulated in the language of causal explanation.<...>For most substantiations of the absolutist concept of causal explanation, the common thing is that in them various regular relations are reduced to a causal relationship, lawfulness is identified with only one of its varieties - causality (1, pp. 88-90).

Theory and its object

Having found out what the theoretical world is, what are its specific characteristics, we now turn to the question of how this world is formed. At the same time, it is necessary to immediately make a reservation that our task will be limited only to the analysis of those research procedures, through which the world of scientific theory is formed. As for the time sequence of these procedures, i.e. actually process constructing a theoretical world, then it will not be the subject of our attention. In other words, we are not going to describe empirically those numerous specific processes of constructing theoretical worlds that have taken place in the history of science, much less build any universal epistemological theory of the genesis of such worlds.

But doesn't this mean a complete rejection of the analysis of the formation of the theoretical world? In fact, researchers working in the field of the epistemology of science, as a rule, were driven by the sole goal - to develop such an epistemological theory that would be the Organon of Science, those. would allow to normalize not only individual specific scientific research procedures, but also the very sequence of these procedures, the entire process of research, scientific discovery as a whole. Since it is obvious that this function could be performed only by that epistemological theory that would give a universal scheme genesisscientific knowledge, to the extent that it becomes clear that practically all the teachings that have so far existed in the epistemology of science, contained as their necessary constituent part genetic the concept of scientific knowledge. Furthermore, this concept often formed the core that determined the nature of the entire epistemological system.

The most diverse and even opposite directions in the epistemology of science were unanimous in resolving the issue of the need to develop a genetic system of scientific knowledge. Differences began only in connection with the problem of establishing the initial, initial element of this scheme. For numerous concepts that make up one of the main epistemological trends - empiricism, empirical knowledge, a fact, is such an initial element.<...>For an alternative direction to empiricism, which, following K Popper, could be called "theoretism", the starting point in the genetic scheme of scientific knowledge is a theoretical position, theory.<...>In our opinion, empiricism and theorism are confirmed to the same degree and equally refuted when they are compared with the actual course of development of science (2, pp. 55-57).

The error of empiricism and theoreticism lies in the fact that each of them considers and elevates to the rank of universal only one particular fragment of the genesis of scientific knowledge.

So, neither empiricism nor theorism can claim the role of a universal epistemological theory of the genesis of science, although these genetic concepts, apparently, can be used to solve individual particular problems of the development of science. True, this reveals one significant difficulty: in the absence of general theory it is not possible to establish the scope of applicability of each of these concepts, i.e. to define the "world of problems" solvable with the help of each of them.

We leave open the question of the possibility of constructing a universal epistemological theory of the genesis of the theoretical world. In our opinion, today it is only obvious that any attempt to create such a theory would have to use as " building material» some transformed variants of the genetic concepts of empiricism and theorism<...>Without claiming to create a universal epistemological theory of the genesis of the theoretical world, we set ourselves a more modest task - to analyze those research procedures through which the theoretical world is formed.

The only subject of this chapter will be the procedure we will call "justification". The fact is that, in our opinion, it is the main means of forming the theoretical world. From this, on the one hand, it by no means follows that this procedure is used only for the formation of scientific theories; substantiation is a universal operation of human cognition, and even more broadly - of consciousness, i.e. spiritual activity in general. On the other hand, characterizing justification as The main thing a means of forming a theoretical world, we mean that this world is created not only by justification. In one way or another, many other research procedures also participate in the construction of the theoretical world, although, as we think, they play a certain auxiliary role in this construction, for they do not so much directly create the theoretical world itself, but, so to speak, supply the “raw materials” for its formation (2, pp. 59-60).<...>

We have in mind a very old tradition that has gone through the entire history of philosophy practically unchanged and is still alive today to consider justification as something unlimitedly universal, i.e. widespread in the most extensive of possible subject areas - in the field of everything that exists. In other words, justification is interpreted as taking place not only in the sphere of consciousness, spiritual activity of a person (as cognitive and evaluative procedures), but also in the sphere of being (as objective processes, connections or relationships). In what follows, we will call justifications belonging to the first sphere "subjective" (and in one of the special cases - "cognitive" or "epistemological"), and justifications belonging to the second sphere - "objective" or "ontological" (2, pp. 60-61).

In contrast to rationalism, we proceed from the fact that the real scope of justification is only the area of ​​human subjective activity, but it makes no sense to talk about justification in relation to being, in our opinion.<...>The recognition of objective justification along with the subjective, in our opinion, does not make sense, not only because it causes associations inspired by the rationalist tradition. feature, for example, causation as relationships of justification, it simply does not add anything positive to the usual characterization of these relationships in terms of the theory of causality. The qualification of a cause as an “objective basis” and an effect as an “objective justified” would make sense only in one case: if in the procedures of cognitive justification, the knowledge of the cause always acted as the basis for the knowledge of the effect. However, the latter is not always the case.

In real research practice, quite often the knowledge of the effect is the basis of the knowledge of the cause. Moreover, in many cases (perhaps even most of them), cognitive reasoning does not deal with mappings of causality at all. In science, functional, structural and other non-causal justifications are widespread and are gaining more and more weight. In this situation, the characterization of the connections and relations of being as justification relations cannot lead to anything but confusion (2, pp. 76-78).

According to its composition, justification breaks down at the bottom of the part: (1) the "justifying" ideal object, or base, and (2) a justifiable ideal object, or substantiated. We call an ideal object any fragment of a person's conscious spiritual activity, displayed in a language.<...>In ordinary consciousness<...>justification is understood only as a process of finding some external “support”, “foundation”, “base” for an object that is made outside and independently of this process: if justification is capable of changing anything, then this only concerns the external status of the object, but in no way nor its own, internal characteristics. Such an interpretation of the justification procedure seems to us completely unacceptable.<...>For the justification procedure, it is essential that it is synthetic(in the traditional philosophical sense of the word) by a procedure. Every act of substantiation is, at the same time, an act of formation of the object being substantiated. This is precisely the meaning and value of the justification procedure.<...>What is justified acquires new characteristics through two main operations: (1) establishing one or another connection between the justified and the ground, and (2) attributing to the first of them some characteristics of the second. However, it does not at all follow from this that substantiation is a kind of autonomously flowing process in which one element (foundation) acts as an active, independent, producing principle, and the other (substantiated) as a passive, passive, produced one. Justification is not done by itself, it is done by a person. And if you want to look for an active independent beginning of the justification procedure, then such a beginning is the person himself, who establishes a certain connection between two ideal objects - the foundation and the justified - and endows the second of them with some characteristics of the first. We specifically emphasize this in connection with the fact that in the history of epistemology and logic, attempts were repeatedly made to present justification as an independent procedure, independently of a person, in which the basis is the driving generating principle (2, pp. 78-81).<...>

From our general characteristics justification as a constructive, synthetic process, during which certain properties of the foundation are attributed to the justified, the corresponding requirements for these constituent elements follow. One of them is that the basis and the justified must allow the fundamental possibility of establishing a connection between them. Another important requirement: the foundation must be in a certain respect richer than the one being justified, i.e. have characteristics that the latter does not have. Thanks to this advantage, the justification procedure is the only one possible (2, p. 82).<...>

Contrary to empiricism, on the one hand, and theorist (rationalism), on the other, we will proceed from the fact that perfect, or completely substantiated, is such a theoretical object of "empirical" science, which received a double - both empirical and theoretical - justification(2, p. 86 ). <...>

Justification can have a variety of structures. - both deductive and inductive, both logical inference and logical non-inference, both logical and extralogical(2, p. 99).<...>The structure of justification, like the structure of any cognitive operation, can be analyzed in two different ways: static and dynamic. In the first case, it is depicted as timeless: the foundation and the justified appear as coexisting. On the contrary, with dynamic structural analysis the justification structure is depicted as temporary, expressing the temporal order, individual ideal objects, private research procedures, which takes place in the process justification.

The static and dynamic structures related to the same substantiation procedure coincide in their composition. Both of them order and link the same set of ideal objects - all those ideal objects that take place in a given procedure. But the principles, ways of ordering and linking them are different. Therefore, in many types of justification, these structures turn out to be inconsistent, and sometimes directly opposite. So, in a deductive explanation, the static structure is a progressive deduction, i.e. a deductive conclusion, in which a certain conclusion necessarily follows from these premises, and the dynamic structure is a regressive deduction, i.e. reasoning in which, in the presence of a conclusion, one looks for premises from which this conclusion would follow deductively. But in some types of justification, the static and dynamic structures turn out to be the same. Thus, in deductive prediction, both structures are progressive deductions (2, pp. 100-101).

From book encyclopedic Dictionary(BUT) author Brockhaus F. A. From the book Big Soviet Encyclopedia(OB) author TSB

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (TE) of the author TSB

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (FE) of the author TSB

Fedorov Evgeny Petrovich Fedorov Evgeny Petrovich [b.15 (28) 12.1911, Strelna, now Leningrad City Council], twice Hero Soviet Union(04/07/1940 and 06/29/1945), Major General of Aviation (1957). Member of the CPSU since 1932. In Soviet army since 1930. He graduated from the military pilot school in Orenburg (1933) and

From the book Encyclopedia of Russian Surnames. Secrets of origin and meaning author Vedina Tamara Fedorovna

NIKITIN An old Russian surname has become known to the world in the 15th century, when the Tver merchant Afanasy Nikitin made his famous journey "over the three seas". The origin of the surname is quite obvious: from the name Nikita, which in Greek means ‘to win’. His

From the book Dictionary of Modern Quotes author Dushenko Konstantin Vasilievich

ASTAFYEV Viktor Petrovich (1924-2001), writer 102 Cursed and killed. novel about the Great Patriotic War (books 1-2, 1992-1994) => "Cursed and forgotten"

From the book 100 great foreign films author Mussky Igor Anatolievich

GABRILOVICH Yevgeny Iosifovich (1899-1993), screenwriter; PANFILOV Gleb Anatolievich (b. 1934), film director 10 Do you dance? (...) And I sing! K / f "Beginning" (1970), scenes. Gabrilovich and Panfilov, dir.

From the book of 100 great travelers author Muromov Igor

"2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY" (2001: A Space Odyssey) Production: "Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer", USA - Great Britain, 1968. Screenwriters A. Clark and S. Kubrick. Directed by S. Kubrick. Operator J. Unsworth. Artists T. Masters, G. Lang, E. Archer. Music by A. Khachaturian, D. Ligeti, I. Strauss.

From the book 100 great originals and eccentrics author Balandin Rudolf Konstantinovich

Nikitin Athanasius (? - 1474/75) Russian traveler, merchant from Tver. Traveled to Persia, India (1466-1474). On the way back I visited the African coast (Somalia), Muscat, Turkey. Travel notes "Journey beyond three seas" is a valuable literary and historical monument. Featured

From the book of 100 great Cossacks author Shishov Alexey Vasilievich

Afanasy Nikitin Afanasy Nikitin, a merchant from Tver, in 1466 equipped two ships with goods borrowed, and went down the Volga, joining the ambassadors of the Shirvan Shah (a country in the Western Caspian), who were returning from Moscow Grand Duke Ivan III. At the mouth Volga

From the book of 100 famous Kharkovites author Karnatsevich Vladislav Leonidovich

African Petrovich Bogaevsky (1872–1934) Lieutenant General of the General Staff. Military ataman of the All-Great Don Army One of the white Cossack leaders in the years civil war in Russia was born in the old village of the Kamensk Region of the Don Cossacks. His father was

From the book The Author's Encyclopedia of Films. Volume II author Lurcelle Jacques

Kushnarev Evgeny Petrovich (born in 1951) Mayor of Kharkov (1991-1996), Governor of the Kharkov region (2000-2004). At the moment these lines are being written, this well-known Kharkov politician evokes different emotions in the local population. The 2004 presidential election divided

The textbook outlines, using higher mathematics, the foundations of theoretical mechanics and the strength of materials, and also provides elementary information from the theory of mechanisms and machines. The solved examples are given in detail.

Size: 2.79 Mb
Format: djvu
Download book from drive.google.com
Download the book from yadi.sk
Link not working? Write about it in a comment.

Section one. Statics.

Chapter 1. Basic concepts and axioms of statics.
§ 1.1. Basic concepts of statics.
§ 1.2. Basic axioms of statics.
§ 1.3. Theorem on the equilibrium of a flat system of three non-parallel forces.
§ 1.4. Decomposition of force into two components.
§ 1.5. Links and reactions of links. The principle of freedom.
§ 1.6. distributed loads.
§ 1.7. The principle of curing.

Chapter 2
§ 2.1. Geometric way definitions of the resultant flat system of converging forces.
§ 2.2. Geometric condition equilibrium of a flat system of converging forces.
§ 2.3. Force projections on coordinate axes.
§ 2.4. An analytical method for determining the resultant plane system of converging forces.
§ 2.5. Analytical conditions for the equilibrium of a flat system of converging forces.

Chapter 3
§ 3.1. Addition of two parallel forces in the same direction.
§ 3.2. Addition of two unequal antiparallel forces.
§ 3.3. Moment of force about a point.

Chapter 4
§ 4.1. A pair of forces and a moment of a pair.
§ 4.2. The main properties of the couple.
§ 4.3. equivalent pairs.
§ 4.4. Pair addition theorem.
§ 4.5. Equilibrium condition for a flat system of pairs.
§ 4.6. Supports and support reactions of beams.

Chapter 5
§ 5.1. Lemma on parallel transfer of force.
§ 5.2. Bringing a flat system of arbitrarily located forces to a given center.
§ 5.3. Properties of the principal vector and principal moment.
§ 5.4. Various cases of bringing a flat system of arbitrarily located forces.
§ 5.5. Analytical conditions for the equilibrium of a flat system of arbitrarily located forces.

Chapter 6
§ 6.1. The concept of friction.
§ 6.2. Sliding friction.
§ 6.3. Equilibrium of a body on an inclined plane.
§ 6.4. Rolling friction.
§ 6.5. Rollover resistance.

Chapter 7. Spatial system of forces.
§ 7.1. Spatial system of converging forces.
§ 7.2. Projection of force on an axis in space.
§ 7.3. Decomposition of force in three coordinate axes.
§ 7.4. An analytical method for determining the resultant spatial system of converging forces.
§ 7.5. Analytical conditions for the equilibrium of a spatial system of converging forces.
§ 7.6. Moment of force about the axis.
§ 7.7. Analytical conditions for the equilibrium of a spatial system of arbitrarily located forces.
§ 7.8. Theorem on the moment of the resultant with respect to the axis (Varignon's theorem).

Chapter 8
§ 8.1. Center of Parallel Forces.
§ 8.2. Determination of the position of the center of gravity.
§ 8.3. Methods for finding the center of gravity.
§ 8.4. The position of the center of gravity of some figures.

Section two. Kinematics.

Chapter 9. Kinematics of a point.
§ 9.1. Basic concepts of kinematics and some information from the theory of relativity.
§ 9.2. Basic definitions of the theory of mechanisms and machines.
§ 9.3. Methods for specifying the movement of a point.
§ 9.4. Point speed.
§ 9.5. Acceleration of a point in rectilinear motion.
§ 9.6. Acceleration of a point in curvilinear motion.
§ 9.7. The concept of the curvature of curved lines.
§ 9.8. Theorem on the projection of acceleration onto the tangent and normal.
§ 9.9. Types of point motion depending on accelerations.
§ 9.10. Formulas and graphs of uniform motion of a point.
§ 9.11. Formulas and graphs of uniform motion of a point.
§ 9.12. The theorem on the projection of velocity on the coordinate axis.
§ 9.13. The theorem on the projection of acceleration onto the coordinate axis.

Chapter 10
§ 10.1. Progressive movement.
§ 10.2. Rotation around a fixed axis.
§ 10.3. Various types of rotational movement.
§ 10.4. Comparison of kinematic formulas for translational and rotational motions.
§ 10.5. Transformation of rotational movements.

Chapter 11
§ 11.1. The concept of the complex movement of a point.
§ 11.2. Velocity addition theorem.

Chapter 12
§ 12.1. The concept of plane-parallel motion.
§ 12.2. Method of instantaneous centers of velocities.
§ 12.3. Properties of the instantaneous center of velocities.
§ 12.4. Decomposition of plane-parallel motion into translational and rotational.

Section three. Dynamics.

Chapter 13 material point.
§ 13.1. Axioms of dynamics. Basic Equation.
§ 13.2. The principle of independence of action of forces. Differential equations of motion of a material point.
§ 13.3. The motion of a material point thrown at an angle to the horizon.

Chapter 14
§ 14.1. Kinetostatic method.
§ 14.2. Forces of inertia in curvilinear motion.

Chapter 15
§ 15.1. The work of a constant force on a straight section of the path.
§ 15.2. The work of a variable force on a curved section of the path.
§ 15.3. Theorem on the work of the resultant.
§ 15.4. Theorem on the work of gravity.
§ 15.5. The work of a constant force applied to a rotating body.
§ 15.6. Power.
§ 15.7. Efficiency.

Chapter 16
§ 16.1. Theorem on the change in momentum.
§ 16.2. Theorem on the change in kinetic energy.
§ 16.3. The law of conservation of mechanical energy.

Chapter 17. Fundamentals of the dynamics of the system of material points.
§ 17.1. The equation of translational motion of a rigid body.
§ 17.2. The equation of rotational motion of a rigid body.
§ 17.3. Kinetic energy of a solid body.
§ 17.4. Comparison of dynamics formulas for translational and rotational motions of a rigid body.
§ 17.5. The concept of balancing rotating bodies.
§ 17.6. Some information about the mechanisms.
§ 17.7. The concept of industrial robots.

Part II Strength of materials.

Chapter 18
§ 18.1. Initial concepts.
§ 18.2. Basic hypotheses and assumptions.
§ 18.3. Types of loads and basic deformations.
§ 18.4. Section method. Voltage.

Chapter 19
§ 19.1. Stresses and strains in tension and compression.
§ 19.2. Hooke's law in tension and compression.
§ 19.3. Transverse deformation under tension and compression.
§ 19.4. Tensile diagram of mild steel.
§ 19.5. Potential strain energy in tension.
§ 19.6. Calculation formula for tension and compression.
§ 19.7. Stretching under its own weight.
§ 19.8. Statistically indeterminate problems.
§ 19.9. Collapse.

Chapter 20
§ 20.1. Shear stresses.
§ 20.2. Calculation formula for shear.
§ 20.3. Deformation and Hooke's law in shear.
§ 20.4. The law of pairing of tangential stresses.
§ 20.5. Tensile stresses in inclined sections. main stresses.

Chapter 21
§ 21.1. The static moment of the area.
§ 21.2. Polar moment of inertia.
§ 21.3. Axial moment of inertia.
§ 21.4. Moment of inertia at parallel transfer of axes.
§ 21.5. Principal axes and principal moments of inertia.

Chapter 22
§ 22.1. The concept of torsion of a round cylinder.
§ 22.2. Plots of torques.
§ 22.3. Stresses and strains during torsion.
§ 22.4. Calculation formulas for strength and torsional rigidity.
§ 22.5. Potential strain energy during torsion.
§ 22.6. Calculation of cylindrical helical springs.

Chapter 23
§ 23.1. The concept of pure bending of a straight beam.
§ 23.2. Bending moment and transverse force.
§ 23.3. Differential dependencies in bending.
§ 23.4. Diagrams of transverse forces and bending moments.
§ 23.5. Normal stresses in pure bending.
§ 23.6. Calculation formula for bending strength.
§ 23.7. Tangential stresses in bending.
§ 23.8. Elastic beam line.
§ 23.9. Oblique bend.

Chapter 24
§ 24.1. Bending and stretching or compression.
§ 24.2. strength hypotheses.
§ 24.3. Bending and twisting.
§ 24.4. Torsion and stretching or compression.

Chapter 25
§ 25.1. The concept of fatigue of materials.
§ 25.2. Endurance limit change.
§ 25.3. fatigue calculations.
§ 25.4. Problems of dynamics in the resistance of materials.

Chapter 26
§ 26.1. The concept of longitudinal bending.
§ 26.2. Euler formula.
§ 26.3. Sustainability calculations.

senior researcher at the Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, candidate of philological sciences.

Born in 1950 in Minsk. While studying at school, he attended a literary circle, which was led by the writer V.I. Porudominsky.

Mechanical engineer by first education. For 15 years he worked at one of the enterprises in Zelenograd near Moscow.

In 1988 he graduated with honors from the editorial and publishing department of the Moscow Polygraphic Institute. Since March 1990 he has been working at the IMLI RAS, where in 1999 he defended his dissertation on the topic "The story "Confession" in the system of artistic and philosophical searches of M. Gorky".

Took part in research project Russian Humanitarian Foundation "Maxim Gorky and the Russian Emigration" (the next volume of "Literary Heritage") No. 97-04-06251 (1997-1999) and the publishing project of the Russian Humanitarian Foundation No. 00 04 16005d 1999 for the publication of the work "Around Gorky's Death: Documents, facts, versions", which was published in 2002 (on the title: 2001) and in the same year received the Gorky Prize.

LIST OF PUBLISHED WORKS E.N. NIKITINA

Books

  1. The inventor of radio - A.S. Popov. Moscow: Education, 1995. 112 p.
  2. "Confession" by M. Gorky: New reading. M.: Nasledie, 2000. 165 p.
  3. Gorky M. Childhood: A Tale. Stories. At the bottom. Summer Residents: Plays; Sholokhov M. Don stories. The fate of man: Stories / Introductory article and comments by E.N. Nikitin. M.: Children's literature, 2004. 668 p. (B-ka world literature for children. T.46).
  4. Chukovsky N.K. About what I saw / Compilation, preface and commentary. E.N. Nikitin. M.: Young Guard, 2005. 688 p.

Reviewer: Akmeychuk N. Semi-forbidden classics // Book Review. 2005. No. 21 (2031). P.18.

  1. Crossing: Collection of poems. Nizhny Novgorod: Povolzhye, 2009. 120 p.
  2. How different they are ... Korney, Nikolai and Lydia Chukovsky. Nizhny Novgorod: Dekom, 2014. 348 p. (Series "Names").

Rec.: Sumatokhina L.V.. How different they are: Chukovsky writers // Bibliography and book science. 2015. No. 6. P. 146–148.

  1. Seven Lives of Maxim Gorky. Nizhny Novgorod: Dekom, 2017. 416 p. (Series "Names").

Articles and publications

  1. Book publishing " world literature"(1918 - 1924) // Book. Research and materials. M., 2008. Sat. 89(1-2). pp.188-214; M., 2009. Sat. 90(1-2). pp.158-183.
  2. One of the "Chayanov publications" // Bibliophiles of Russia. 2008. V.5. pp.286-296.
  3. Gorky on the secrets of literary skill // Literary studies. 2008. No. 5. P.108-121.
  4. Maxim Gorky and Russian socialists (1897 - 1917) // Questions of history. 2008. No. 8. P.24-43.
  5. Maxim Gorky and Vladimir Vernadsky (On the history of contacts) // Izvestiya AN. Literature and Language Series. 2008. V.67. No. 2. P.12-21.
  6. Some aspects of commenting on the works of classics in a publication intended for children // Integration technologies in teaching Russian literature. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference April 17 - 18, 2008 Nizhny Novgorod, 2008. P.302-307.
  7. Maria Derenkova in the story "My Universities" and in life // Man and the world in the work of M. Gorky. Gorky Readings 2006. Materials of the International conference. N. Novgorod, 2008. S.184-187.
  8. The unfulfilled plan of the Z.I. Grzhebin" // Book. Research and materials. M., 2007. Sat. 87(2). pp.144-157.
  9. Shkrob S.I. // There. pp.661-662.
  10. Berman L.L. // There. pp.399-400.
  11. Berliner G.O. // Synopsis of time: Days and labors of Alexander Ratner. M., 2007. S.398-399.
  12. Addressed to researchers of Z.N. Gippius // Bibliography. 2007. No. 6. P.101-103.
  13. Correspondence K.I. Chukovsky with academician V.V. Vinogradov and N.M. Malysheva // Izvestiya AN. Literature and Language Series. 2007. V.66. No. 4. P.56-68 (partially rewritten in the book: Chukovsky K.I. Collected works: In 15 vols. M., 2009. V.15. P.546-548, 561-563 ).
  14. On the Anniversary of the "Literary Heritage" // Soviet Bibliography. 1981. No. 3. P.54.
  15. To the 70th anniversary of Yu.I. Masanova // Ibid. No. 5. P.59-60.
  16. When and where was V.N. Figner? // Soviet archives. 1982. No. 4. P.69.
  17. Mae sustrachy [publication of the memoirs of B.S. Irinina about meetings with Yanka Kupala] // Literature and art (Minsk). 1982. No. 27(3125). June 9 (July) (in Belarusian).
  18. The author of a complete dictionary [about P.G. Sennikovsky] // Book Review. 1982. No. 51(865). December 24th.
  19. Good memory of I.F. Masanova // Librarian. 1983. No. 2. P.48-51.
  20. "I bequeath to you, children, to read books" [about I.P. Kulibine] // Ibid. No. 8. P.56-58.
  21. "Friends of my life" [about D.I. Mendeleev] // Ibid. No. 10. P.55-57.
  22. "Not to read means not to live" [about I.S. Nikitin] // Ibid. 1984. No. 8. S.52-54.
  23. The only great goal [about P. Paradizov] // Soviet printer. 1984. No. 7-8(872-873). 30th of March.
  24. The whole is a Russian song. To the 175th anniversary of the birth of Alexei Vasilyevich Koltsov // Librarian. 1984. No. 10. S.58-60.
  25. Mikhail Vasilyevich Urnov is 75 years old! // Soviet printer. 1984. No. 22-23(887-888). December 4th.
  26. Reveal the merits of the original // Rainbow (Kyiv). 1984. No. 12. P. 170.
  27. On the history of the creation of the book by Yu.I. Masanova "In the world of pseudonyms, anonymous names and literary forgeries" // Book: Research and materials. M., 1985. Sat.51. pp.163-167.
  28. "I am still in the Bolshevik ranks." To the 120th anniversary of the birth of Hakob Hakobyan // Librarian. 1986. No. 5. P.47.
  29. "... A wonderful commander." To the 80th anniversary of the birth of I.D. Chernyakhovsky // Ibid. No. 8. P.47.
  30. Poet-bookseller [about I.S. Nikitin] // Book trade. M., 1986. Issue 18. pp.207-211.
  31. Lifetime publications of N.S. Leskova // Soviet bibliography. 1987. No. 3. P. 94-95.
  32. Masanovs: father and son // Book Review. 1987. No. 36(1110). 4 September.
  33. Archive of the historian P.P. Paradizova // Archaeographic Yearbook for 1988. M., 1989. S.237-252. References to this work in the book: Koval L.M.. V.I. Nevsky: Director main library countries. 2nd ed., add. Moscow: Pashkov House, 2011 (see im. uk.).
  34. Bibliographer and poet [about N.N. Bakhtin] // Soviet bibliography. 1989. No. 2. S.55-57.
  35. Living soul [about E. Smirnova-Chikina] // Ibid. 1990. No. 1. P. 134-140.
  36. "We met you late..." From the correspondence of I.F. Masanova with F.I. Vityazev // Ibid. 1991. No. 1. P. 125-132; No. 2. P.115-126.
  37. "Convoy" P.P. Paradise // New world. 1991. No. 9. P. 249.
  38. On the history of the creation of the "Dictionary of pseudonyms of Russian writers, scientists and public figures"I.F. Masanova // Book: Research and materials. M., 1992. Sat. 64. P. 90-98.
  39. Sell ​​Siberia to the Americans [memoirs of V.I. Anuchin about M.V. Frunze] // Manager. 1992. No. 8. P.14.
  40. "I am not a Marxist and never will be." Unknown letter from Gorky A.M. Skabichevsky // Ibid. No. 17. P.15.
  41. "Russian culture is on the brink of death." Letter from S. Oldenburg to Gorky // Ibid. No. 19. P.13.
  42. Unknown letter to A.M. Gorky V.M. Molotov // Russian news. 1993. No. 59(228). March 27th.
  43. Was V.I. Anuchin? // New world. 1993. No. 4. S.247-249.
  44. Letter from Podolsk [M.D. Kuzmina-Mendeleeva V.M. Molotov dated March 7, 1934] // Podolsky district: Local history supplement to the newspaper "Podolsky worker". 1993. 6 August.
  45. M. Gorky and Marxism. New materials // Gorky Readings 1993 Nizhny Novgorod, 1994. P.69-72.
  46. "In the service of enlightenment" [op. on the book: Moscow publisher V.M. Antique: Catalog of publications, 1906-1918 / Comp. L.V. antique; Ed. and intro. Art. L.I. Univerga. M., 1993] // Bibliography. 1994. No. 4. P. 125-127.
  47. Little man and big idea // World of the unknown. 1994. No. 14. July. pp.18-21.
  48. Unknown letter [Gorky A.M. Skabichevsky from the end of February 1897] // Slovo. 1994. No. 1-6. S.84-85.
  49. I.F. Masanov and "Academia" // Bibliography. 1994. No. 5. S.109-114.
  50. Family honor or truth? // New world. 1994. No. 11. S.247-249.
  51. Chekhov and Leskov. Fulfilled predictions // World of the unknown. 1994. No. 21. November. pp.13-14.
  52. "... Quietly walks among us healed" // Ibid. 1995. No. 4(28). pp.13-14.
  53. Academician Tarle was written from Kryukov // Forty-one. 1995. No. 50(317). 27th of June.
  54. Letters from M. Gorky to V.I. Anuchin: The history of one publication // M. Gorky and his era: Materials and research. M., 1995. Issue 4. pp.171-175.
  55. Ideological and philosophical searches of Gorky until 1907 // Gorky readings of 1995. Nizhny Novgorod, 1996. P. 91-96.
  56. M. Gorky: dialogue with history [edit. on the book: Spiridonova L.A. M. Gorky: dialogue with history. M., 1994] // Russian literature. 1996. No. 2. S.209-211.
  57. Sweet smell of buns // Forty-one. 1996. No. 82. July 25.
  58. It began with Yakimanki and Ordynki: Moscow in the drawings of M. Lukichev // Ibid. No. 127. November 6th.
  59. Brilliant Maria Fedorovna // Word. 1996. No. 9-10. P.64-65 (reprint: Literary Zelenograd. Almanakh. M., 1998. P.115-117; Moscow. 2005. No. 9. P.114-117).
  60. "Protect from destruction ..." From the correspondence of M. Gorky [letters to A.I. Rykov (dated March 5, 1927), V.V. Kuibyshev (dated February 27, 1934), V.M. Molotov (dated April 1935)] // Ibid. P.66.
  61. Defender of liberalism [about V.M. Garshine] // Literary Zelenograd. M., 1997. P.71.
  62. Forgive us, Varlam Tikhonovich [about Shalamov] // Ibid. P.72.
  63. To the biography of V.I. Vernadsky. Letters from scientist V.M. Molotov // Domestic archives. 1997. No. 2. S.80-83.
  64. "We ask you to give us a piece of land." Through the pages of the first two volumes of M. Gorky's letters // Slovo. 1997. No. 11-12. S.29-31.
  65. Reflection of the philosophy of A.A. Bogdanov in Gorky's story "Confession" // Gorky Readings. 1997 Nizhny Novgorod, 1998, pp. 148-153.
  66. Letter from the historian M.S. Grushevsky V.M. Molotov // Domestic archives. 1998. No. 3. P. 94-98.
  67. "The facts of death from exhaustion should be pointed out." Gorky's letter to Oldenburg [May 1919] // Izvestiya RAN. Literature and Language Series. 1998. V.57. No. 3. P.58-59.
  68. Pushkin and the Bolsheviks // Literary Zelenograd. M., 1999. P.102.
  69. Y. Baltrushaitis and M. Gorky // To the 125th anniversary of the birth of Jurgis Baltrushaitis. To the 80th anniversary of Lithuanian diplomacy. Scientific readings. May 30, 1998 M., 1999. S.56-64.
  70. M. Gorky and L.N. Tolstoy. Comparison of two "Confessions" // Gorky Readings. 1998 Nizhny Novgorod, 2000. V.2. pp.14-18.
  71. Official versions of Gorky's death // M. Gorky. Materials and research. M., 2001. Issue 6. Around the death of Gorky: Documents, facts, versions. pp.228-240.
  72. Artist and critic (from the history of the creation of Gorky's memoirs about Chekhov) // Gorky Readings. year 2000. N. Novgorod, 2002. S.180-187.
  73. Participates in the preparation for publication of the second series (letters) of the Complete Works of M. Gorky (V.1-13. M., 1997-2007, - publication continues).
  74. Philosopher-collectivist // Bibliography. 2002. No. 4. P. 100-120.
  75. Archive A.M. Gorky. T.16. A.M. Gorky and M.I. Budberg (1920-1936). M., 2001 [review] // Izvestiya AN. Literature and Language Series. 2002. V.61. No. 6. P.69-71.
  76. Editor's preamble // Gorky M. complete collection compositions. Letters. In 24 t. M., 2002. T.9. pp.291-298.
  77. Remarkable Grzhebinsk edition // Bibliophile. People, manuscripts, books. Secrets and discoveries: Collection. 2003. No. 1(7). pp.171-188.
  78. Korney Chukovsky - Nikolai Chukovsky. Correspondence (1921-1963) / Entry. note, prepare text and notes. E.N. Nikitina // Banner. 2004. No. 1. P. 141-163 (completely in the book: Chukovsky N.K. About what he saw. M., 2005. P. 368-670, partially in the book: Chukovsky K.I. Collected works .: In 15 vols. M., 2008. V. 14. S. 467-469, 575-579; Ibid. M., 2009. V. 15. S. 168, 189-191, 225-228 , 231-233, 248-250, 300, 319, 323-325, 331-333, 377-378).
  79. Correspondence K.I. Chukovsky with V.A. Kaverin / Introductory article, preparation of the text and notes by E.N. Nikitin // Izvestiya AN. Literature and Language Series. 2004. V.63. No. 2. P.62-68 (partially translated. In the book: Chukovsky K.I. Collected works: In 15 vols. M., 2009. V.15. P.310-311, 503-504 , 608-609, 619-620, 623-625).
  80. Magazine "Tomorrow" (unfulfilled publishing plan of Gorky) // Maxim Gorky and literary searches of the XX century. Gorky readings. 2002: Proceedings of the international conference. Nizhny Novgorod, 2004.S.461-465.
  81. Hope of Ivan Shmelev // I.S. Shmelev and spiritual traditions Slavic culture. XI Crimean International Shmelev Readings. Collection of materials of the international scientific conference September 11-15, 2002, Alushta. Alushta, 2004. S.104-110.
  82. Book by I.S. Shmelev about Valaam in the context of the Russian literary tradition // Tvorchestvo I.S. Shmelev in the axiological aspect. XIII Crimean International Shmelev Readings. Collection of materials of the international scientific conference September 10 - 15, 2004 Alushta, 2004. P.68-72 (2004 is indicated on title page, in fact the book was published in 2006, signed for publication on September 19, 2005).
  83. Muratov editions // Bibliophiles of Russia. Almanac. M.: Beloved Russia, 2005. V.2. pp.458-465.
  84. Correspondence K.I. Chukovsky with M.N. Albov / Introductory article, preparation of the text and notes by E.N. Nikitin // Izvestiya AN. Literature and Language Series. 2005. V.64. No. 1. S.51-57 (partially rewritten in the book: Chukovsky K.I. Collected works: In 15 vols. M., 2008. V.14. S.225-229).
  85. Rereading Gorky // Zelenograd Today: Who's Who in Zelenograd Literature. M., 2005. S.16-17.
  86. What art should be // Moscow. 2005. No. 9.S.111-114.
  87. Publishing house Z.I. Grzhebin // Bibliography. 2005. No. 5. P.85-100.
  88. “The work must be done by artists of a new spirit, from them you are the first ...” Letters to V.A. Bazarov to Gorky // M. Gorky. Materials and research. M., 2005. Issue 7. pp.102-164.
  89. E.V. Tarle and K.I. Chukovsky. Correspondence / Publication prepared by E.N. Nikitin // Questions of History. 2006. No. 1. P.85-96.
  90. "Thank you for your dictionary." Correspondence K.I. Chukovsky with S.I. Ozhegov / Introduction. article prepared. text and notes. E.N. Nikitin // Izvestiya AN. Literature and Language Series. 2006. V.65. No. 4. P.60-62.
  91. Authors of the "Literary Heritage" [bio-bibliographic index] // Bibliography. 2006. No. 5. P.150-157; No. 6. P.135-146; No. 4. S.149-157; No. 5. S.147-159; No. 6. P.138-146; 2008. No. 1. P.150-157; No. 4. S.156-159; No. 5. S.147-158; No. 6. P.135-148; 2009. No. 1. P.146-158; No. 3. S.149-158.
  92. Untimely Gorky: On Publicism 1914 - 1918. // Creativity of Maxim Gorky in the socio-cultural context of the era: Gorky Readings 2004. Proceedings of the international conference. N. Novgorod, 2006. S.107-112.
  93. Biography of A.F. Devrien, written by his son // Book. Research and materials. M., 2007. Sat. 86(1). pp.128-130.
  94. Unknown poet - Nikolai Chukovsky // Literary studies. 2009. No. 3. P.167-178.
  95. Gorky and the idea of ​​collectivism // M. Gorky. Materials and research. M., 2009. Issue. 9 (The concept of the world and man in the work of M. Gorky). pp.188-223.
  96. The role of the concept of "truth" in Gorky's work in the second half of the 1910s // Integration technologies in teaching philological disciplines. Proceedings of the II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference April 22-25, 2009 Nizhny Novgorod, 2009. P.298-303.
  97. Nizhny Novgorod exile E.N. Chirikova // Nizhny Novgorod text of Russian literature. Interuniversity collection of scientific articles. Nizhny Novgorod, 2009. S.107-112.
  98. V.V. Vinogradov in correspondence with K.I. Chukovsky with N.M. Malysheva // Text and context: linguistic, literary and methodological aspects. T. 2. Text and context in literary criticism. M.; Yaroslavl, 2009. S.208-214.
  99. Theodore Fontane is a poet. To the 190th anniversary of the birth // Literary studies. 2009. No. 6. S.204-209.
  100. Autograph of Father Iakinf // Bibliophiles of Russia. M., 2009. V.6. pp.111-119.
  101. Chukovsky K.I. Sobr. cit.: V 15 t. M., 2009. V.15 (participation).
  102. Gorky M. Full. coll. op. Letters: V 24 vol. M., 2009. Vol. 14 (participation).
  103. An unknown page from the history of the Kolkhoznik magazine // Maxim Gorky: a view from the 21st century. Gorky Readings 2008. Materials of the International conference. Nizhny Novgorod, 2010. S.151-156.
  104. The history of the relationship between Gorky and V.I. Vernadsky // Maxim Gorky: a view from the XXI century. Gorky jubilee readings 2008. Proceedings of the International Conference (Moscow, 2008). M., 2010. S.117-126.
  105. On the return of Maxim Gorky to Soviet Russia // Integration technologies in teaching philological disciplines: types, principles, techniques: Proceedings of the III All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference April 22 - 23, 2010: In 2 volumes. Nizhny Novgorod, 2010. Vol. 1. pp.289-294.
  106. Chukovsky N.K. Under siege / Entry. note and post E.N. Nikitina // Youth. 2010. No. 5. P.9-29.
  107. "You can't renounce Russia anyway." Letters from Z.N. Gippius V.V. and V.D. Rozanov / Publication, introductory article and comments by E.N. Nikitina // Literary journal. 2010. No. 27. P.172-205.
  108. War in the life and work of N.K. Chukovsky // Bibliography. 2010. No. 5. P.83-91.
  109. He was driven by the power of love (N.K. Chukovsky) // Literary studies. 2010. No. 5. P.192-208.
  110. “Publishing house Z.I. Grzhebin" (1919 - 1924) // Book. Research and materials. M., 2010. Sat. 92. Ch. 1-2. pp.166-194; Sat. 93. Ch. 1-2. pp.141-162.
  111. Poet in love with Russia. To the 135th anniversary of the birth of R.M. Rilke // Literary studies. 2010. No. 6. P. 163-178.
  112. M. Gorky and A. Bogdanov. Unknown correspondence 1908 - 1910 / Entry. article by L. Spiridonova; Prep. the text of Gorky's letters to L. Spiridonova with the participation of G. Propolianis, the letters of Bogdanov to E. Nikitin; Note. To the letters of Gorky - L. Spiridonova, to the letters of Bogdanov - E. Nikitin // M. Gorky. Materials and research. M.: IMLI RAN, 2010. Issue. 10 (Gorky in the Mirror of the Epoch: Unpublished Correspondence). pp.9-160.
  113. “I want to go to Russia, where everything has changed miraculously…” Letters to N.N. Sukhanov to Gorky / Introduction. article prepared. text and notes. E.N. Nikitina // Ibid. pp.391-424.
  114. Pushkin, Khitrovo and others // Bibliophiles of Russia. Almanac. M., 2010. V.7. pp.350-364.
  115. Book master V.I. Anisimov // Bibliophiles of Russia. Almanac. M., 2011. V.8. pp.201-226.
  116. French count turned German poet. To the 130th anniversary of the birth of Adelbert von Chamisso // Literary studies. 2011. No. 1. P.270-285.
  117. Literary struggle of the 20s in the letters of Alexei Tveryak // Literary studies. 2011. No. 2. P.202-233.
  118. On the poetry of Zinaida Gippius // Integration technologies in teaching philological disciplines: types, principles, techniques. Materials of the IV All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. April 28, 2011 Nizhny Novgorod, 2011. Vol. 1. P. 210-215.
  119. The Russian language is the basis of intercultural relations. On the example of translations of poems by R.M. Rilke, T. Fontane, A. Chamisso // Russian language in the communicative space of the modern world. Collection of materials of the International Conference. M., 2011. S.131-136.
  120. The first book of I.S. Shmeleva and Russian literary tradition// Poetry of Russian life in the work of I.S. Shmelev. Shmelev Readings 2007 and 2009 Materials of international scientific conferences. M., 2011. S.100-106.
  121. Creativity I.S. Shmelev in the assessment of M.Yu. Levidova // Ibid. pp.389-394.
  122. Journal A.M. Gorky "Chronicle" // Bibliography. 2011. No. 4. P.123-139; No. 5. P.127-139; No. 6. P.137-147; 2012. No. 1. P.153-159; No. 3. S.153-156; No. 4. P.135-159; No. 6. P.135-142.
  123. Poetry is above everything. To the 120th anniversary of the birth of Johannes Becher // Literary studies. 2011. No. 5. P.248-261.
  124. Publishing House "Thought" in the memoirs of N.K. Chukovsky // Book. Research and materials. M., 2011. Sat.94. Part 2. pp.104-127.
  125. Having glorified the foam-born Venus. To the 105th anniversary of the birth of Georg Maurer // Literary studies. 2012. No. 1. P.206-210.
  126. On Gorky's first meeting with the "Serapion Brothers" // M. Gorky and Culture: Gorky Readings 2010: Proceedings of the XXXIV International Scientific Conference. Nizhny Novgorod: RI "Begemot", 2012. P.85-93.
  127. About poetic translation // Integration technologies in teaching philological disciplines: methods of implementation: Collection of materials of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference. April 25-27, 2012 Nizhny Novgorod, 2012. Vol. 3. P. 326-329.
  128. On a letter from Ivanov-Razumnik to Gorky // Literary studies. 2012. No. 3. S. 152-159.
  129. Chukovsky Nikolai Korneevich // Moscow Encyclopedia. M .: Moscow textbooks, 2012. T. 1. Book. 5. S. 339-340.
  130. Petrograd publishing house "Thought" // book culture. Experience of the past and problems of the present. To the 285th anniversary of the founding of the Academic Printing House in Russia. Proceedings of the V International Scientific Conference (Moscow, October 24 - 26, 2012): In 2 vols. Moscow: Nauka, 2012. Vol. 1. Part 1. P. 277-281.
  131. On the need for a historical approach in solving textological problems // Textual Time. Russian Literature of the 20th Century: Questions of Textual and Source Studies. M.: IMLI RAN, 2012. Book. 2. S.951-960.
  132. Authors of "Literary Heritage" // Literary Heritage. M., 2012. T.104. Book 1. P.407-476 (together with M.A. Frolov).
  133. “To go into battle to the singing of the Marseillaise…”: On the occasion of the 125th anniversary of the birth of Georg Geim // Literary studies. 2012. No. 6. P.225-230.
  134. Power and freedom: M. Gorky and M. Prishvin: On the history of the relationship between two writers // Literary studies. 2013. No. 1. P.188-209.
  135. On Gorky's return to Soviet Russia// Literary studies. 2013. No. 4. P.164-181.
  136. "Untranslatable" Clemens Brentano // Literary studies. 2013. No. 5. S. 193-199.
  137. Life wonderful person: (To the 85th anniversary of V.I. Porudominsky) // Bibliography. 2013. No. 4. P.133-157.
  138. On the history of the publication of the collected works of M.M. Prishvin 1927 - 1930 // Book. Research and materials. M., 2013. Sat.99. Ch.1-2. pp.129-150.
  139. M. Gorky and "The Great Break" // Program of the International Scientific Conference "Metamorphosis of Cultures and New Perspectives. M., 2013. P.4 (translation into Japanese is given on p. 5).
  140. “... I began to write not only about Vishnevsky” (Letters from N.K. Chukovsky to A.L. Dymshits) // Konstantin Fedin and his contemporaries (Fedinsky readings. Issue 5): On the 120th anniversary of the birth of K.A. Fedin. Saratov, 2013. S. 174-180.
  141. Letter to the Editor // New Literary Review. 2013. No. 6(124). pp.406-408.
  142. "Untimely thoughts" of Gorky and modernity // M. Gorky and modernity: integration into cultural space: Collective monograph. Kazan: Publishing House of the Kazan State University of Culture and Arts, 2014. P.141-146.
  143. About poetic translation // Word - image - text - context: materials III All-Russian scientific and methodological conference with international participation "Word - image - text - context". Odintsovo: ANOO VPO "Odintsovo humanitarian Institute", 2014. S. 300-305.
  144. Gorky, Grzhebin and bibliophilia // Book in the information space: Proceedings of the thirteenth International scientific conference on problems of bibliology: At 4 o'clock. M.: Nauka, 2014. Part 1. P. 146-147.
  145. I.S. Shmelev and the "Publishing Association of Writers" in St. Petersburg // Book: Research and Materials. M.: Nauka, 2014. Sat. 100. S. 151-158.
  146. About one rare edition // Bibliophiles of Russia: Almanac. M.: Beloved Russia, 2014. T. 10. S. 302-319.
  147. M. Gorky and Ivanov-Razumnik: (History of one letter) // M. Gorky and Russia. Gorky readings - 2012. March 28 - 28. Proceedings of the XXXV International Scientific Conference. Nizhny Novgorod, 2014, pp. 271-281.
  148. "... He was funnier than Averchenko and Teffi" [about Arkady Bukhov] // Bibliography. 2014. No. 3. P. 152-159; No. 4. S. 142-158; No. 5. S. 154-158; Bibliography and book science. 2015. No. 1. P. 149-159; No. 3. S. 137-143.
  149. “Writing is a difficult and responsible business”: Correspondence between M. Gorky and M. Prishvin / Entry. article prepared. text and notes. E.N. Nikitina // M. Gorky: Materials and research. M., 2014. Issue. 12. Gorky: Unknown pages of history. pp. 338-425.
  150. About the author of "Zhukov on pins" // Literary studies. 2014. No. 5. S. 209-216.
  151. “Happiness is to be at your own ... favorite business”: Emmanuil Filippovich Tsipelzon // Bibliophiles of Russia: Almanac. Moscow, 2014, vol. 11, pp. 220–260.
  152. “By proxy of the author” [About the first edition of “Zangezi” by V. Khlebnikov] // Ibid. pp. 513–521.
  153. Say a word about the poor bibliographer // Bibliography. 2014. No. 6. P. 114-116 (signed by N.N. Ivanov).
  154. The novel "Kashcheev's chain" in the letters of M.M. Prishvin to the critic N.I. Zamoshkin // Integration technologies in teaching philological disciplines: Collection of articles of the VI All-Russian scientific and practical conference of teachers, scientists, specialists, graduate students, students. Nizhny Novgorod, 2014, pp. 248-254.
  155. The book born of the revolution: "My sister is life" in the assessment of contemporaries // Pasternak Readings: Research and Materials. M., 2015. Issue. 3. S. 206–214.
  156. The writer's letters are an important source scientific biography(Based on the correspondence between M.M. Prishvin and N.I. Zamoshkin) // XX century in the mirrors of the epistolary, diaries, memoirs. Fedinsky readings. Issue. 6. Saratov: Information Center “Nauka”, 2015, pp. 43-47.
  157. "... He was funnier than Averchenko and Teffi" // Bibliography and book science. 2015. No. 1. P. 149-159; No. 3. S. 137-143.
  158. Research on the ascetic of the publishing business // Ibid. No. 3. S. 78-81.
  159. M. Gorky and "The Great Break" // Metamorphosis of cultures and new perspectives: Collection of articles of the international scientific conference "Joint research in Japan and European countries transformation of cultural manifestations as an intercultural phenomenon in the 20th century to the present day" at the Italian Institute of Culture in Moscow as part of the "Strategic Young Researcher Overseas Visit Program for Accelerating Brain Circulation" with the support of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) initiated by Tokyo University of Studies (TUFS). Tokyo, 2015, pp. 7–17.
  160. War in the life and work of Nikolai Chukovsky // XII Surguchev Readings. Literature and journalism in the flames of war: from World War I to great victory: collection of materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Stavropol February 27 - 28, 2015) / ed. A.A. Fokina and O.I. Lepilkina. Stavropol: Design Studio, 2015, pp. 20–25.
  161. On the biographical prose of Vladimir Porudominsky // Gorky, Shmelev, Teffi and others: Anniversary collection for the eightieth anniversary of Lydia Alekseevna Spiridonova. M., 2015. S. 252-261.
  162. A.N. Tikhonov - a participant in the publishing endeavors of M. Gorky // Book: Research and Materials. M., 2015. Sat. 102. S. 83-108.
  163. Publishing house "Sail" (1915 - 1918) // Bibliography and book science. 2015. No. 4. P. 151-159.
  164. Russian German Jakob Lenz // Literary studies. 2015. No. 5. S. 190-198.
  165. Too Russian Shmelev // New Russian Humanitarian Research. 2015. No. 10.
  166. “Your three volumes are lying next to me on the table”: On the history of the relationship between I.S. Shmelev and M.N. Albova // I.S. Shmelev and problems national consciousness(traditions and innovation): Proceedings of international scientific conferences Shmelev readings 2011 and 2013. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2015, pp. 166-172.
  167. Two letters to I.S. Shmelev to V.V. Muyzhel // Ibid. pp. 314-322.
  168. M. Gorky and his journal "Chronicle" // Transformation of personality and culture during world crises and humanitarian catastrophes. To the 100th anniversary of the start of the First World War: Collection of articles based on the materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference. Kazan: IIC “Culture”, 2015, pp. 145–151.
  169. About one unknown work by V.V. Rozanova // Nizhny Novgorod text of Russian literature: Collection of articles based on materials of the V International Scientific Conference. Nizhny Novgorod: Minin University, 2015, pp. 182–184.
  170. Gorky newspaper "New Life" // M. Gorky: the lessons of history. Gorky Readings 2014: Proceedings of the XXXVI International Scientific Conference. Nizhny Novgorod: OOO BegamontNN, 2016. P. 45–53.
  171. "Sail" - M. Gorky's anti-war publishing project // Economic and social-humanitarian studies. 2016. No. 3(11). pp. 130–136.
  172. "Life of Klim Samgin" in the context of European literature of the first half of the 20th century. To the formulation of the problem // Gorky - an artist and a thinker. Gorky Readings - 2016: Proceedings of the XXXVII International Scientific Conference. Nizhny Novgorod: BegemotNN LLC, 2016. P. 185–193.
  173. The first volume of the Archive of A.M. Gorky" as a mirror of the political struggle of the early twentieth century. // Bibliography and book science. 2016. No. 6. P. 144–150.
  174. From the history of the 6th book of the almanac of the Krug publishing house. Letters to A.N. Tikhonov M. Gorky / Introduction. article prepared. text and notes. E.N. Nikitina // M. Gorky. Materials and research. Issue. 11. M. Gorky and his addressees. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2016, pp. 125 – 169.
  175. Gorky publishing house "Sail" (1915 - 1918) // Book: Research and materials. M., 2017. Sat. 3–4(108–109). pp. 96–125.
  176. Official versions of Gorky's death // The mystery of the death of Maxim Gorky: Documents, facts, versions / otv. ed. L.A. Spiridonov. Moscow: AST, 2017, pp. 11–26.
  177. "Sail" - anti-war and, in fact, anti-revolutionary publishing project of Gorky // Russian Revolution of 1917 in literary sources and documents. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2017, pp. 203–210.
  178. About "Hard worker Slovotekov". Innovation of the genre // Dramaturgy of M. Gorky in the historical and functional aspect (materials and research. Issue 13). Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2017, pp. 231–282.
  179. Autograph of the historian Ivan Zabelin // Bibliophiles of Russia: Almanac. M.: Beloved Russia, 2017. T. 13. S. 235–244.
  180. "Life of Klim Samgin" and literary process in Europe in the first half of the 20th century // International Conference "The World Significance of M. Gorky". (To the 150th anniversary of his birth). March 27–30, 2018: Abstracts of scientific reports. M.: IMLI RAN, 2018. P. 58.

Main publications of E.N. Nikitin

Books:

A) Nikitin E.N. How different they are ... Korney, Nikolai and Lydia Chukovsky. Nizhny Novgorod: Dekom, 2014. - 348 p. (22 a. l.) - 1500 copies. – ISBN 978-5-89533-311-2.

B) Nikitin E.N. Seven Lives of Maxim Gorky. Nizhny Novgorod: Dekom, 2017. - 416 p. (26 a. l.) - 1700 copies. – ISBN 978-5-89533-390-7.

Articles:

A) Nikitin E.N. What art should be // Moscow. 2005. No. 9. P. 111–114.

B) Nikitin E.N. Maxim Gorky and Vladimir Vernadsky: On the history of contacts // Izvestiya AN. Literature and Language Series. 2008. V. 67. No. 2. S. 12–21.

C) Nikitin E.N. Maxim Gorky and Russian Socialists (1897–1917) // Questions of History. 2008. No. 8. S. 24–43.

D) Nikitin E.N. Publishing House "World Literature" (1918-1924) // Book: Research and Materials. Moscow: Nauka, 2008. Sat. 89. Ch. 1–2. pp. 188–214; There. M.: Nauka, 2009. Sat. 90. Ch. 1–2. pp. 158–183.

E) Nikitin E.N. Poet in love with Russia. To the 135th anniversary of the birth of R.M. Rilke // Literary studies. 2010. No. 6. P. 163–178.

Contacts: This email address is being protected from spambots. You must have JavaScript enabled to view.


All books can be downloaded for free and without registration.

THEORY.

NEW. V.D. Cooper. Lectures on Theoretical Mechanics. In 3 volumes. 1970-1974 year. djvu.
Volume 1. 234 pages 8.3 Mb.
Volume 2. 256 pages 10.3 Mb.
Volume 3. 271 pages 10.0 Mb.
Lectures on theoretical mechanics were given by the author for a number of years to students of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics of the Mathematical Faculty of Novosibirsk State University. The "Lectures" include the main questions of the university course in theoretical mechanics. The kinematics is presented first, and then the dynamics. Such a construction of the course is consistent with the existing programs in the department in mathematical disciplines. The study of mechanics in the applied department begins with theoretical mechanics and then continues in a number of general courses on continuum mechanics: an introduction to continuum mechanics, hydro-gas dynamics, theories of elasticity and plasticity. In accordance with this, theoretical mechanics is interpreted as the mechanics of the simplest models of real bodies. When discussing research methods and general laws of theoretical mechanics, prospects for their development in continuum mechanics are outlined. Another feature of the presentation is the emphasis on those mathematical problems to which the solutions of the considered mechanical problems are given, since the study of similar problems is an important part of continuum mechanics. Download from depositfiles



Similar articles