The Samara teacher left to "raise" the village forgotten by God. A) The sentence has homogeneous subjects and one predicate

13.02.2019
An emperor who knew his fate. And Russia, which did not know ... Romanov Boris Semyonovich

A. M. Gorky's novel "Mother"

A. M. Gorky's novel "Mother"

The novel "Mother" was conceived by Gorky as a kind of "gospel of socialism". As is usually written literary critics, this novel, which has the central idea of ​​the resurrection from darkness human soul, filled Christian symbols: in the course of action, the analogy between the revolutionaries and the biblical apostles is repeatedly played out; Pavel Vlasov's friends merge in the dreams of his mother into the image of the collective Christ, with the son in the center, Pavel himself is associated with Christ, and Nilovna with the Mother of God, who sacrifices her son for the salvation of the world. The central episode of the novel, the May Day demonstration, in the eyes of one of the characters turns into procession in the name of "the New God, the God of light and truth, the God of reason and good." Pavel's path, as you know, ends with a kind of "sacrifice on the cross". All these moments were deeply thought out by Gorky. He was sure that the element of faith was very important in introducing the people to socialist ideas (in the 1906 articles "On the Jews" and "On the Bund" he directly wrote that socialism is the religion of the masses).

For whom did Gorky propose this religion? We read the lines about Pavel's father:

So lived Mikhail Vlasov, a locksmith, hairy, gloomy, with small eyes; they looked suspiciously from under thick brows, with a wicked smile. The best locksmith at the factory and the first strongman in the settlement, he behaved rudely with his superiors and therefore earned little, every holiday he beat someone, and everyone did not like him, they were afraid. They also tried to beat him, but to no avail. When Vlasov saw that people were coming at him, he grabbed a stone, a board, a piece of iron in his hands and, legs wide apart, silently awaited the enemies. His face, overgrown with a black beard from eyes to neck, and hairy hands inspired fear in everyone. His eyes were especially feared - small, sharp, they drilled into people like steel gimlets, and everyone who met their gaze felt a wild force in front of him, inaccessible to fear, ready to beat mercilessly.

- Well, go away, you bastard! he said dully. Large yellow teeth gleamed through thick hair on his face. People dispersed, cursing him with cowardly howling curses.

- Bastard! he said shortly after them, and his eyes shone with a sharp, awl-like grin. Then, holding his head defiantly straight, he followed them and called out:

- Well, - who wants to die?

Nobody wanted.

He spoke little, and "bastard" was his favorite word.

“He earned little,” but somehow Gorky does not write what the family needed, what they could not buy. When Mikhail Vlasov fell ill, a doctor came to him and offered to perform an operation - again, Gorky does not write that there was no money for a doctor, for an operation in a hospital. Mikhail himself refused the operation.

But maybe the Vlasov family lived in the basement, in the barracks, in the "bed-room dormitory"? No, all the workers of this factory lived in a suburb in separate houses (they rented them), and, apparently, the rent was not a burden, otherwise Gorky would certainly have mentioned this.

What were these houses? Here is the Vlasov house, a family of three:

Their house stood on the edge of the settlement, at a low but steep descent to the swamp. A third of the house was occupied by the kitchen and a small room, separated from it by a thin partition, in which the mother slept. The remaining two-thirds square room with two windows; in one corner of it is Pavel's bed, in the front there is a table and two benches. A few chairs, a chest of drawers for linen, a small mirror on it, a chest with a dress, a clock on the wall and two icons in the corner - that's all.

Pavel did everything that a young guy needed: he bought an accordion, a shirt with a starched chest, a bright tie, galoshes, a cane and became the same as all teenagers of his years. He went to parties, learned to dance the square dance and the polka, returned home drunk on holidays and always suffered greatly from vodka. The next morning I had a headache, suffered from heartburn, my face was pale and dull.

A separate house, even if small, was not so bad for a family of three (and after the death of his father, for two) at that time. Let me remind you that in the USSR even in the 1970s. they were put on a waiting list for housing with a living space of less than 4.5 m 2 per person (later less than 6 sq. m per person), and housing was given at the rate of 12 m 2 per person - it seems that the Vlasov family had no less before the death of his father. So in the USSR, even in the 1970s. they would not have been put on the waiting list for housing improvements, and their footage was in line with the Soviet norms of the 1970s.

And where is poverty, need, malnutrition in the Vlasov family? While still a teenager, Pavel earns enough at the factory to pay the rent of a separate house, and dress up, and buy an accordion (an expensive purchase). By the way, remember that the action of the novel takes place around 1904-1905, and subsequently the standard of living of workers and their social security has steadily increased.

Well, in those years, the All-Russian Workers' Union of Zubatov operated at many large factories, which introduced workers to both study and culture - but Gorky could not describe such a more typical factory for that time. His novel would not have turned out in such a factory.

Well, was life hopeless and hopeless in the described working settlement?

It seems not. Here Pavel Vlasov started the right way:

And there was something new in his attitude to his mother: he sometimes swept the floor in the room, he made his own bed on holidays, in general he tried to make her work easier. No one in the community did this.

Once he brought and hung a picture on the wall - three people, talking, walked somewhere easily and cheerfully.

- It's the risen Christ going to Emmaus! Pavel explained.

Mother liked the picture, but she thought: “You revere Christ, but you don’t go to church…”

There were more and more books on the shelf, beautifully made to Pavel by a fellow carpenter. The room looked pleasant. He told her "you" and called her "mom".

But at the same time, Pavel Vlasov falls under the influence of the socialists. Why are they starting to tease him? Reading...

It's clear. Natural history by Darwin. Like, not God created man, but monkeys. It is also interesting that these "mentors" do not appeal at all to the fact that the workers live poorly financially. Here is what the main “mentor”, a crest named Nakhodka, says:

There are a lot of well-fed, honest ones! We must build a bridge across the swamp of this rotting life to the future kingdom of kindness of the heart, this is our business, comrades!

Well, his accomplice, the son of the thief Danida, known to the settlement, adds:

- It's time to fight, so there is no time to heal your hands! Vyesovshchikov objected dully.

Gradually, these socialists are expanding their activities in the village, printing leaflets. And what about the suburban workers? Reading:

Elderly people who had good earnings at the factory cursed:

- Troubles! For such things, you need to beat the face!

And they carried the sheets to the office. The youth read the proclamations with enthusiasm:

- Truth!

The majority, crammed with work and indifferent to everything, lazily responded:

- Nothing will happen, - is it possible?

But the leaflets agitated people, and if they were not there for a week, people would already say to each other:

- They apparently quit printing ...

And on Monday the leaflets appeared again, and again the workers made a muffled noise. In the tavern and in the factory they noticed new ones, no one famous people. They questioned, examined, sniffed and immediately caught everyone's eyes, some with suspicious caution, others with excessive obsession.

Y-yes... All this socialist agitation looks somehow mean.

The socialists look vile, vile in this "gospel" of socialism from Maxim Gorky.

And in the story with the "swamp penny" - instead of negotiating with the management, to achieve conditions acceptable to both sides and together do a good deed, drain the swamp, immediately - a booze and a strike. Moreover, it was the same with Gorky: the workers do not feel sorry for this penny for draining the swamp, but it is the socialists who incite the workers to strike - immediately, without negotiations.

And it is clear that the main thing for them, for the socialists, is to incite hatred. And, even worse, to achieve blood - in conversations between themselves, they directly talk about this.

So the “dearest leader” Andrey Onisimovich Nakhodka opened his face:

- For comrades, for the cause - I can do anything! And I will kill. Though son...

- Oh, Andryusha! the mother exclaimed softly. He smiled at her and said:

- It can't be otherwise! Such a life!.. .

But it turns out that he had already killed - not yet his son, but the factory timekeeper, who offered him to come to his senses.

The whole philosophy of these “saviors of the world” revolves around the fact that it is necessary to expel Jesus Christ from the soul of a Russian person (the socialists and their leaders understand exactly that it is he, Christ, who is the main obstacle in their way!) and replace Christ in the soul with some kind of “god- friend” (as Andrei Onisimovich calls him), but in essence - to replace the true God with the illusion of a coming universal paradise on Earth, without God and against God.

And the unfortunate mother, Nilovna, was caught in their nets by these lost souls. But her heart, from the very beginning, correctly suggested that darkness and horror were behind all this:

It suddenly became difficult for her to breathe. Opening her eyes wide, she looked at her son, he seemed alien to her. He had a different voice - lower, thicker and more resonant. He plucked his thin, fluffy mustache with his fingers and strangely, frowningly looked somewhere in the corner. She was afraid for her son and felt sorry for him.

- Why are you doing this, Pasha? she said. He raised his head, looked at her, and quietly, calmly answered:

- I want to know the truth.

His voice was soft but firm, and his eyes shone stubbornly. She realized in her heart that her son had doomed himself forever to something secret and terrible. Everything in life seemed inevitable to her, she was accustomed to obey without thinking, and now she only wept softly, unable to find words in her heart, compressed by grief and longing.

Of course, I feel sorry for Pavel Vlasov and the unfortunate Pelageya Nilovna, but first of all, I feel sorry for those who have gone astray, as lost, as seduced by an illusion ...

Gorky was fond of the so-called god-building and believed that it was the working class that was the source of the "worship of socialism." The expression "the gospel of socialism" came from the Narodniks, and the novel "Mother" was written precisely as the gospel - that is, the "good news" - of socialism.

Well, since this novel is really precisely the "gospel of socialism", then - from the point of view of people who know the Bible (even if they are unbelievers) - the main theoretical question is who (or what) is put in the place of Jesus Christ, and what sacrifices ready adherents of the new "gospel" for the sake of their faith.

Gorky, through the lips of Andrey Nakhodka, claims that "For the sake of business and comrades - I will kill my son." This is the moment of truth of the new "religion".

From the point of view of a believing Christian, Jesus Christ, by His Sacrifice, put an end to this Old Testament problem. And even if after His Resurrection someone hears the call to kill his son, for a Christian it is clear that this is not the “voice of God”, but from the devil of speech. But it is not necessary to believe in God, it is enough to be a decent and moral person (even if of socialist convictions) in order to understand that one must follow the commandment “Thou shalt not kill”, and not the “gospel of socialism”.

If the adherents of socialism are not ready for “filicide” (forcibly imposing socialism and repressions against those who disagree), capitalism evolves to a society with strong social guarantees, sometimes (as in Norway or Sweden) and directly to socialism (according to Soviet concepts, current Norwegian socialism in general more like communism, as it was represented in the USSR).

Well, in Russia, by 1917, the people had already largely fallen away from Orthodoxy (as the core of life), the educated society had almost completely departed from it, and such adherents of socialism as Lenin in 1915-1917. already openly called for fratricidal civil war. “Turn the imperialist war into a civil one…” – this Leninist slogan was extolled by Soviet historians and is bashfully hushed up or veiled by false reservations by their “heirs” today…

From the book 100 great mysteries of the XX century author

THE DEATH OF MAXIM GORKY (Material by M. Ershov) “Here medicine is innocent ...” This is exactly what the doctors Levin and Pletnev, who treated the writer in recent months of his life, and later brought in as defendants in the trial of the “right-wing Trotskyite

From the book Stalin. Red Monarch author Bushkov Alexander

The assassination of leaders of the Soviet state S. M. Kirov, V. R. Menzhinsky, V. V. Kuibyshev, A. M. Gorky

From the book The Secret History of Stalin's Crimes author Orlov Alexander Mikhailovich

"Medical" murder: the death of Gorky 1 At the third Moscow trial, Stalin gave an answer to those foreign critics who increasingly stubbornly posed the same tricky question: how to explain the fact that dozens of carefully organized terrorist groups, about which

From the book 100 great sights of Moscow author Myasnikov senior Alexander Leonidovich

The mansion of Stepan Pavlovich Ryabushinsky ( memorial museum Gorky) This architectural masterpiece on Malaya Nikitskaya confirms the fact that the best Russian Art Nouveau mansions in Russia are located in Moscow. The mansion of Stepan Pavlovich Ryabushinsky, erected by Fedor

From the book The Great Terror. Book I author Conquest Robert

THE DEATH OF GORKY Stalin planned the execution of the members of the opposition, regardless of the possible reaction in the ranks of the party. For he was already prepared to deal with this reaction (my usual combination of firmness and maneuver. The only figure that these methods could

From book The Greatest Mysteries XX century author Nepomniachtchi Nikolai Nikolaevich

THE DEATH OF MAXIM GORKY "Here medicine is not to blame..." This is exactly what the doctors Levin and Pletnev, who treated the writer in the last months of his life, and later brought in as defendants in the trial of the "Right-Trotskyist bloc" at first stated. Soon,

From the book How Stalin was killed author Dobryukha Nikolai Alekseevich

Chapter 5 Gorky's Pendulum From February to October 1917, two Russian revolutions turned the world upside down. The Petrel, the Prophet, and then suddenly the Critic of these revolutions was Gorky. In it, as in a hellish cauldron, the voices and echoes of those days were mixed, the echo of which is still seething

From the book The Split of the Empire: from the Terrible-Nero to Mikhail Romanov-Domitian. [The famous "ancient" works of Suetonius, Tacitus and Flavius, it turns out, describe Great author Nosovsky Gleb Vladimirovich

3. The mother of Vitellius and the mother of "False" Dmitry Suetonius tells the following story about Vitellin. Upon entering Rome, he met his mother at the Capitol and greeted her. Vitellius himself, in a battle cloak, girded with a sword, riding a magnificent horse, set off with

author Tolstoy Lev Nikolaevich

Instead of a preface (From M. Gorky's essay "Leo Tolstoy") ... He has amazing hands - ugly, knotty from dilated veins, and yet full of special expressiveness and creative power. Probably Leonardo da Vinci had such hands. You can do anything with these hands.

From the book Russian World [Collection] author Tolstoy Lev Nikolaevich

Instead of an afterword (From the essay by M. Gorky “Leo Tolstoy”) Leo Tolstoy died. A telegram was received, and in it it was said in the most ordinary words - he died. state, I imagine it as I knew

From the book Retribution author Kuzmin Nikolai Pavlovich

Revolution stunned Gorky A Russian intellectual with an exotic biography behind him, he sincerely believed that the autocracy was destroying Russia, preventing it from developing its natural capabilities and entering on an equal footing into the family of the advanced countries of the planet. He hated Nicholas II

From the book Leningrad Utopia. Avant-garde in architecture northern capital author Pervushina Elena Vladimirovna

Palace of Culture. A.M. Gorky Modern address - pl. Stachek, 4. The House of Culture of the Moscow-Narva District of Leningrad, located near the Narva Gates, was built in 1925–1927 according to the design of architects A.I. Gegello, A.I. Dmitrieva, D.L. Krichevsky and engineer V.F.

From the book Faces of the Century author Kozhemyako Viktor Stefanovich

author Trube Lev Ludwigovich

Features of the nature and planning of the city of Gorky Where, along the banks of the Volga, two parts of the Gorky region, different in nature, converged - the elevated forest-steppe Right Bank and the lowland forest Trans-Volga, at the confluence with the Volga Oka, it is spacious, on a vast territory of 334 square

From the book Streets of the city of Gorky author Trube Lev Ludwigovich

From the history of the development of Nizhny Novgorod - Gorky In the complex maze of buildings and structures, areas of old and new buildings of the modern city of Gorky, there is a logic that reflects the era in the development of the city. The historical core from which development began Nizhny Novgorod -

From book complete collection compositions. Volume 19. June 1909 - October 1910 author Lenin Vladimir Ilyich

7.2. Violation in the construction of a sentence with an inconsistent application.

INTRODUCTION

An application is a definition expressed by a noun in the same case (that is, AGREED) as the word being defined. Characterizing the object, the application gives it a different name and claims that it has some additional feature. Applications can refer to any member of a sentence expressed by a noun, a personal pronoun, a substantiated participle and an adjective, as well as a numeral. For example: This is how Mikhail Vlasov lived, locksmith, hairy, sullen, with small eyes (M. G.); It was her Peterhof stranger(Paust.); The first, the eldest of all, Feda, you would give fourteen years old (T.); Mother and father rode from Siverskaya station, and we, children, went out to meet them (Nab.).

Note: Proper names used in figuratively(quoted in writing) are also attachments, they are called UNAGREED as opposed to AGREED.

Also very often proper names written without quotes are applications.

The components of some types of compound words are not applications (although they resemble them in the form of connections): words, part of which are evaluative words (firebird, good boy, boy-woman, unfortunate leader, miracle fish).

UNAGREED APPENDICES, expressed by the code name.

7.2.1. Proper names - names used in a figurative sense (quoted in writing), are always applications if they refer to the word being defined, and are in the nominative case, regardless of case form defined word. For example: Among the seven hundred sailors who landed from the battleship "Potemkin" on the Romanian coast, was Rodion Zhukov (Cat.); During the test of the tanker "Leningrad" shipbuilders launched another similar vessel - "Klaipeda". This type of application is present in USE assignments . Please note: as soon as the DEFINED word “leaves” the sentence (that is, book, magazine, picture, play, article, car, steamboat and so on), PROPER NAME ceases to be an application, compare: the history of the novel "Eugene Onegin" is the history of the creation of "Eugene Onegin"; Malevich made several copies of the "Black Square" - Kazimir Malevich's painting "Black Square" was created in 1915.

7.2.2 If we are talking about APPENDIX - a proper name, but written without quotes, then there is a very long set of rules governing their writing. Some groups of proper names agree with the word being defined, others do not. Fortunately, there were no such assignments on the Unified State Examination (at least until 2016).

Following these rules, one should write, for example,

On the planet Mars (not Mars);

On Lake Baikal (and not Baikal);

Behind Mount Elbrus (and not Elbrus).

On the Ganges (not the Ganges), but on the Moscow River (not the Moscow River).

For complete information on writing such appendices, please read any of Dietmar Rosenthal's textbooks on stylistic and literary editing.

Establish a correspondence between grammatical errors and sentences in which they are made: for each position of the first column, select the corresponding position from the second column.

GRAMMATICAL ERRORS SUGGESTIONS

A) incorrect construction of a sentence with an inconsistent application

B) violation of the connection between the subject and the predicate

C) a violation in the construction of a sentence with a participial turnover

D) incorrect construction of a sentence with participial turnover

D) violation in the construction of a sentence with homogeneous members

1) The impossibility of returning to the old order after the war of 1812 was widely felt in a society that had experienced a national upsurge.

2) Each tool brings the highest benefit in the hands of those who have studied it as deeply as possible.

3) Today in Ch. Aitmatov’s novel “And the day lasts longer than a century” bears the deep burden of memory, since “the human mind is a clot of eternity that has absorbed our past, present and future.”

4) Nature heals not only the human soul, but can also be blind and cruel to him.

5) B latest novel In his epic "Katorge" Pikul talks about hard labor on Sakhalin.

6) Upon returning to the capital, Vostryakov firmly decided to make a marriage proposal to Marya Alekseevna.

7) After finishing reading, something turned over in my soul.

8) The crowd of listeners, as soon as the performance was over, jumped up from their seats and began to shout loudly.

9) It seemed to me that everyone looked at me with condemnation.

Write down the numbers in response, arranging them in the order corresponding to the letters:

ABATGD

Explanation (see also Rule below).

A) a violation in the construction of a sentence with an inconsistent application in sentence 5. The title of the novel, a proper name, is placed in nominative case, if it is an application, that is, the second name.

Here is the correct spelling: In the last novel of his epic "Katorga", Pikul talks about convicts on Sakhalin.

Rule 7.2.1 paragraph

7.2. Violation in the construction of a sentence with an inconsistent application.

INTRODUCTION

An application is a definition expressed by a noun in the same case (that is, AGREED) as the word being defined. Characterizing the object, the application gives it a different name and claims that it has some additional feature. Applications can refer to any member of a sentence expressed by a noun, a personal pronoun, a substantiated participle and an adjective, as well as a numeral. For example: This is how Mikhail Vlasov lived, locksmith, hairy, sullen, with small eyes (M. G.); It was her Peterhof stranger(Paust.); The first, the eldest of all, Feda, you would give fourteen years old (T.); Mother and father rode from Siverskaya station, and we, children, went out to meet them (Nab.).

Note: Proper names used in a figurative sense (quoted in writing) are also applications, they are called UNAGREED in contrast to AGREED.

Also very often proper names written without quotes are applications.

The components of some types of compound words are not applications (although they resemble them in the form of connections): words, part of which are evaluative words (firebird, good boy, boy-woman, unfortunate leader, miracle fish).

UNAGREED APPENDICES, expressed by the code name.

7.2.1. Proper names - names used in a figurative sense (quoted in writing), are always applications if they refer to the word being defined, and are in the form of the nominative case, regardless of the case form of the word being defined. For example: Among the seven hundred sailors who landed from the battleship "Potemkin" on the Romanian coast, was Rodion Zhukov (Cat.); During the test of the tanker "Leningrad" shipbuilders launched another similar vessel - "Klaipeda". It is this type of application that is present in the tasks of the exam. Please note: as soon as the DEFINED word “leaves” the sentence (that is, book, magazine, picture, play, article, car, steamboat and so on), PROPER NAME ceases to be an application, compare: the history of the novel "Eugene Onegin" is the history of the creation of "Eugene Onegin"; Malevich made several copies of the "Black Square" - Kazimir Malevich's painting "Black Square" was created in 1915.

7.2.2 If we are talking about APPENDIX - a proper name, but written without quotes, then there is a very long set of rules governing their writing. Some groups of proper names agree with the word being defined, others do not. Fortunately, there were no such assignments on the Unified State Examination (at least until 2016).

Following these rules, one should write, for example,

On the planet Mars (not Mars);

On Lake Baikal (and not Baikal);

Behind Mount Elbrus (and not Elbrus).

On the Ganges (not the Ganges), but on the Moscow River (not the Moscow River).

For complete information on writing such appendices, please read any of Dietmar Rosenthal's textbooks on stylistic and literary editing.

B) the violation of the connection between the subject and the predicate in sentence 8 is that the subject CROWD is a singular word. It is necessary to put the predicate also in units.

Here is the correct spelling: The crowd of listeners, as soon as the performance was over, jumped up from their seats and began to shout loudly.

Rule 7.3.2 paragraph

7.3. Agreement of the predicate with the subject

INTRODUCTION

Subject - main member suggestions, which is consistent with its predicate according to the laws of grammar.

The subject and predicate usually have the same grammatical forms of number, gender, person, for example: Clouds are rushing, clouds are winding; Invisible moon Illuminates the flying snow; The sky is cloudy, the night is cloudy.

In such cases, we can talk about the agreement of the predicate with the subject. However, the correspondence of the grammatical forms of the main members of the sentence is not necessary, there may be an incomplete correspondence of the grammatical forms of the main members: My whole life has been a guarantee of a faithful date with you.- correspondence of number forms, but different forms of gender; Your destiny is endless chores- inconsistency of number forms.

The grammatical connection of the main members of the sentence is considered as coordination. This grammatical connection is wider and freer than agreement. Different words can enter into it, their morphological properties do not have to correspond to each other.

When coordinating the main members of the sentence, the problem arises of choosing the forms of the number of the predicate, when the gender / number of the subject is difficult to determine. This section of the "Reference" is devoted to consideration of these issues.

7.3.1. In a complex sentence, pronouns act as subjects

If in a sentence (and not necessarily in NGN!) a pronoun is used as a subject, then you need to know a number of rules that prescribe how to correctly coordinate the predicate with it.

A) If the subject is expressed by the pronouns WHO, WHAT, NOBODY, NOTHING, SOMEONE, SOMEONE, WHOEVER, then the predicate is put in the singular form: For example: [Those ( who neglect the opinions of others) risk being left alone].

EXAMPLE 1 (Whoever comes), [everyone will know].

EXAMPLE 2 [No one knew (that the lesson was postponed).]

EXAMPLE 1 (Whoever comes, [everyone will know].

EXAMPLE 2 [No one knew (that the lesson was postponed).]

B) If the subject is expressed by the plural pronoun TE, ALL, the predicate is put in the plural form. If the subject is expressed by pronouns in singular THAT, TA, TO, the predicate is put in the singular form. For example: [ THOSE (who graduated with honors) are more likely to enter a university free of charge].

This proposal is built on the following model:

[Those (who + the predicate), ... the predicate ...]. And this is the most common model in which it is proposed to find an error. Let's analyze the structure of a complex sentence: in the main sentence, the pronoun “those” is the subject, pl. h; "have" -predicate, pl. This is in line with rule B.

Now attention to subordinate clause: “who” is the subject, “finished” is the predicate in the singular. This is in accordance with rule A.

Consider sentences with a grammatical error:

EXAMPLE 1 [Everyone (who purchased tickets at the box office) must independently check in for the flight].

EXAMPLE 2. [Those (who have seen the northern lights at least once) will no longer be able to forget this extraordinary phenomenon].

EXAMPLE 3. [Those (who are planning a vacation for the summer) buy tickets in the spring].

Here are the corrected versions:

EXAMPLE 1 [Everyone (who purchased tickets at the box office) MUST check in for the flight on their own].

EXAMPLE 2. [Those (who have seen the northern lights at least once) will no longer be able to forget this extraordinary phenomenon].

In examples 1 and 2, the error is easy to see: it is enough to throw out the subordinate clause. In the following example, the error often goes unnoticed.

EXAMPLE 3. [Those ( who are planning a vacation for the summer) buy tickets in the spring].

C) If the subject is expressed by the phrase ONE OF .., EACH OF ..., NONE OF .. then the predicate is put in the singular form. If the subject is expressed by the phrase MANY FROM ..., SOME FROM ..., ALL FROM .. then the predicate is put in the plural form. For example: [None of those (who won a prize) wanted to go to the republican competition].

Consider sentences with a grammatical error:

EXAMPLE 4 [Many of those (who have been to Mikhailovsky Park) were amazed at the size of the old estate trees].

EXAMPLE 5 [Each of us (who has been in a similar situation) certainly thought about ways out of it].

EXAMPLE 6 [Each of the parties (which presented its project) defended its advantages over other projects].

Here are the corrected versions:

EXAMPLE 4 [Many of those (who have been to Mikhailovsky Park) were amazed at the size of the old manor trees].

EXAMPLE 5 [Each of us (who has been in a similar situation) certainly thought about ways out of it].

EXAMPLE 6 [Each side, (who presented her project), defended its advantages over other projects].

D) If the sentence contains a turnover of WHO, HOW NOT .., the predicate is put in the singular masculine form. For example: Who, if not parents, SHOULD teach children the ability to communicate?

This turnover can be considered as clarifying, see other examples in clause 7.3.3, part B.

Consider sentences with a grammatical error:

EXAMPLE 7 Who, if not we, should worry about the cleanliness of our cities?

EXAMPLE 8 Who, if not your mother, taught you a model of endurance and love of life?

Here are the corrected versions:

EXAMPLE 7 Who, if not us, should worry about the cleanliness of their cities?

EXAMPLE 8 Who, if not your mother, taught you a model of endurance and love of life?

7.3.2 Predicate coordination with subject, expressed word or combination of words with the meaning of quantity

When coordinating the main members of the sentence, the problem arises of choosing the forms of the number of the predicate, when the subject points to many objects, but appears in the singular.

A) The role of the subject is the collective name of nouns and words close to them in meaning.

Collective nouns denote a set of homogeneous objects or living beings as an indivisible whole: FOLIAGE, DUBNYAK, ASPEN, CHILDREN, STUDENTS, TEACHER, PROFESSORIES, PEASANTS. They have the form of only the singular, do not combine with quantitative numbers and with words denoting units of measure, but can be combined with the words a lot / little or how much: LITTLE RELATIONS, A LITTLE LEAVES, A LOT OF MOSHKORA.

The words PEOPLE, PACK, ARMY, GROUP, CROWD can also be attributed to them in terms of the meaning of collectiveness; THOUSAND, MILLION, HUNDRED; TROIKA, PAIR; DARKNESS, DEEP, LOTS AND OTHERS

The subject, expressed by a collective noun, requires the predicate to be set only in the singular form:

For example: The children frolicked in the courtyard of the house; young people often take the initiative.

The subject expressed by a noun like GROUP, CROWD also requires setting the predicate only in the singular form:

For example: A group of festival participants shared their impressions; a trio of horses rushed under the windows

Consider sentences with a grammatical error:

EXAMPLE 1. Over the past three years, the leadership of the Central and regional markets have repeatedly filed complaints with higher organizations.

EXAMPLE 3. A couple of lovers were sitting on a bench.

Here are the corrected versions: 

EXAMPLE 1. Over the past three years, the leadership of the Central and regional markets have repeatedly filed complaints with higher organizations.

EXAMPLE 3. A couple of lovers were sitting on a bench.

B) The subject is a collective noun with a quantitative meaning

The nouns MOST, MINORITY, PLENTY, SERIES, PART, despite the grammatical form of the singular, denote not one object, but many, and therefore the predicate can take not only the form of the singular, but also the plural. For example: On this pond ... an innumerable number of ducks were hatched and kept; Many hands are knocking on all the windows from the street, and someone is breaking on the door. Which form would you prefer?

The subject, which has in its composition the collective nouns MOST, MINORITY, Plenty, ROW, PART, requires the predicate to be set only in the singular form, if:

a) there are no dependent words from the collective noun

Part went on vacation, and part remained; many scatteredAxis, a minority remainedAxis

b) the collective noun has a singular dependent word

With a subject that has in its composition the words MOST, MINORITY, PLENTY, SERIES, PART, you can put the predicate both in the plural form and in the plural, if the noun has a dependent word in the plural:

Most students passed the test; a number of participants demonstrated excellent knowledge.

Some of the books were purchased for the library; a number of objects delivered ahead of schedule

The plural of the predicate in such constructions usually indicates the activity of the actors.

Consider the cases in which the use of the plural of the predicate is allowed and permissible.

The predicate is put
in the singular, ifplural, if
The activity of animated persons is not emphasized:

Part of the conference participants did not accept participation in the discussion

Activity is highlighted. The subject is animate.

Most writers strongly rejected editor fixes. Most students are good answered on the lesson.

Activity is not emphasized, the passive participle indicates that the object itself does not perform the action.

Row of workersattracted to responsibility.

Activity is emphasized in the presence of participial or participle turnover.
Activity is not emphasized, subject is inanimate

Most Items lay in disarray

A number of workshops manufactures parts for our workshop.

Activity is also indicated by a number of homogeneous members:

Majority editors, proofreaders, authors, reviewers studied these documents.

Most editors got order, got acquainted with its content and made necessary conclusions. A number of homogeneous predicates.

Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that the singular form of the predicate is more in line with the tradition of book writing styles and the use of the plural form of the predicate must be clearly justified. An error in the tasks of the exam will be the unreasonable setting of the predicate in the plural.

Consider sentences with a grammatical error:

EXAMPLE 4 Most of the tasks were not done correctly enough.

EXAMPLE 5 A number of events will be held in Yelets, Voronezh, Orel.

EXAMPLE 6 A lot of poems by this author were published in the series "Children's Library"

Here are the corrected versions: 

EXAMPLE 4 Most of the tasks were not completed correctly. The predicate in the form of a passive participle indicates passivity actor.

EXAMPLE 5 A number of events will be held in Yelets, Voronezh, Orel. Events cannot act on their own, so the predicate must be used in the singular.

EXAMPLE 6 Many poems by this author were published in the Children's Library series.. The predicate in the form of a passive participle indicates the passivity of the actor.

C) The combination of a numeral with a noun acts as a subject

With a subject expressed by a quantitative-nominal combination, the same problem arises: in what number is it better to use the predicate. In Chekhov we find: Some three soldiers stood side by side at the very descent and were silent; He had two sons. L. Tolstoy preferred the following forms: Three peasants and a woman sat in the sleigh; Two feelings fought in his soul - good and evil.

Note: In the USE assignments, such cases do not occur, since there is a high possibility of incorrect classification of the type of error - such cases can be attributed to an error in the use of a numeral. Therefore, we confine ourselves to remarks of a general nature and note the most gross errors made in written works.

With a subject that has in its composition a numeral or a word with the meaning of quantity, you can put the predicate both in the plural form and in the singular:

Five years have passed; ten graduates have chosen our institute

Use different forms depends on the meaning that the predicate brings to the sentence, activity and generality of action is emphasized by the plural. number.

The predicate is usually put in the singular if

In the subject, a numeral ending in "one":

Twenty-one students of our institute are included in the city's volleyball team, but Twenty-two (three, four, five...) students of our institute are members of the city's volleyball team

If the message fixes this or that fact, the result, or when the message is given an impersonal character:

Twenty-two suits sold; Three or four students will be transferred to another class.

The predicate is expressed by a verb with the meaning of being, presence, existence, position in space:

Three kingdoms stood before her. The room had two windows with wide window sills. Three windows of the room faced north

Wrong: Three kingdoms stood. There were two windows with wide window sills in the room. Three windows of the room faced north.

A single number, which creates an idea of ​​a single whole, is used to designate a measure of weight, space, time:

Thirty-four kilograms of drying oil will be required to paint the roof. Twenty-five kilometers remained until the end of the journey. A hundred years have passed. However, already, it seems, eleven o'clock struck. Five months have elapsed since

Wrong: Thirty-four kilograms of drying oil will be required to paint the roof; Twenty-five kilometers remained until the end of the journey. A hundred years have passed. However, already, it seems, eleven o'clock has struck. Five months have elapsed since then.

With a subject expressed by a complex noun, the first part of which is the numeral sex-, the predicate is usually put in the singular, and in the past tense - in the middle gender, for example: half an hour will pass, half a year has flown by, half the city participated in the demonstration.

Wrong: half the class participated in the competition, half an hour will pass

7.3.3 Coordination between subject and verb separated from each other

Between the subject and the predicate there may be secondary separate members sentences specifying members, subordinate clauses. In these cases, it is necessary to strictly observe general rule: the predicate and the subject must agree.

Let's consider special cases.

A) Coordination of the subject and the compound nominal predicate in a sentence built according to the “noun. is a noun.”

Note for the teacher: this type of error in the SPP is noted in his manual "How to get 100 USE points" (2015) by I.P. Tsybulko, while in the "Handbook of Spelling and Literary Editing" by D. Rosenthal, such an error is called a construction shift in a complex sentence.

The nominal part of the predicate in a sentence built according to the noun + noun model must be in the nominative case.

For example: [First, (what you should learn) is highlighting the basis of the sentence].

The grammatical basis of the main clause consists of the subject first and predicate selection. Both words are in the nominative case.

And this is what it looks like proposal with an error: [The first (what should be learned) is the selection of the basis of the sentence]. Under the influence of the subordinate clause, the predicate received the genitive case, which is a mistake.

Consider sentences with a grammatical error:

EXAMPLE 1 [The main thing (what you need to pay attention to) is the ideological side of the work]

EXAMPLE 2 [The last thing (to stop) is the composition of the book]

EXAMPLE 3 [The most important (what is worth striving for) is the fulfillment of a dream]

Here are the corrected versions:

EXAMPLE 1 The main thing (what you need to pay attention to) is the ideological side of the work]

EXAMPLE 2 [The last (what should be stopped) is the composition of the book]

EXAMPLE 3 [The most important (what is worth striving for) is the fulfillment of a dream]

B). Coordination of the predicate with the subject, in which there are clarifying members.

In order to clarify the subject, sometimes clarifying (explaining turns), connecting members of the sentence, separate additions are used. Yes, in the proposal Competition Jury, including representatives of a cosmetic company selected from the audience, could not determine the winner the highlighted turnover is a connecting one(in other manuals it is called clarifying).

The presence in the sentence of any member that specifies the meaning of the subject does not affect the number of the predicate. Such turns are attached with the words: EVEN, ESPECIALLY, INCLUDING, FOR EXAMPLE; EXCEPT, INCLUDING, INCLUDING and the like. For example: Editorial Board, including the editors of the Internet portal, is in favor of reorganization.

Consider sentences with a grammatical error:

EXAMPLE 4. The entire team, including dancers and jugglers, spoke out in favor of participating in the competition.

EXAMPLE 5. The whole family, and especially the younger children, was looking forward to the arrival of their grandfather.

EXAMPLE 6. The school administration, including members of the parent committee, supported holding an extended parent meeting.

Here are the corrected versions:

The mistake is easy to see if you throw out the subordinate clause.

EXAMPLE 4 The whole team, including dancers and jugglers, spoke out in favor of participating in the competition.

EXAMPLE 5 The whole family, and especially the younger children, was looking forward to the arrival of their grandfather.

EXAMPLE 6 The school administration, including members of the parent committee, advocated holding an expanded parent meeting.

7.3.4 Coordination of the predicate with the subject, the gender or number of which is difficult to determine.

For the correct connection of the subject with the predicate, it is very important to know the gender of the noun.

A) Certain categories or groups of nouns have difficulty in determining the gender or number.

The gender and number of indeclinable nouns, abbreviations, conditional names and a number of other words are determined special rules. For the correct coordination of such words with the predicate, you need to know their morphological features.

Ignorance of these rules cause errors: Sochi became the capital of the Olympics; cocoa is cold; shampoo is over; the university announced the enrollment of students, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported

Need: Sochi has become the capital of the Olympics; cocoa has cooled down; shampoo is over, the university announced a set of students, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported

Nouns, the gender/number of which is difficult to determine, are discussed in the section. After studying the above material, you will be able to successfully complete not only task 6, but also 7.

Consider sentences with errors

EXAMPLE 1. The parcel was sent at the beginning of the week.

In the sentence, the word "package" is the subject, female. The predicate "was sent" is in the masculine. This is mistake. We fix: The parcel was sent at the beginning of the week

EXAMPLE 2. The tulle harmonized perfectly with the color of the upholstered furniture.

In the sentence, the word "tulle" is the subject, masculine. The predicate "approached" is in the feminine. This is mistake. We fix: The tulle harmonized perfectly with the color of the upholstered furniture.

EXAMPLE 3. The UN has met for another meeting.

In the sentence, the word "UN" is the subject, feminine (organization). The predicate "gathered" is on average. This is mistake. We fix: The UN met for a regular meeting.

EXAMPLE 4. Foreign Ministry announced participation in the meeting

In the sentence, the word "MIA" is the subject, it does not change. When decrypted, we get "Ministry

Foreign Affairs". At the same time, we recall that given word belongs to the masculine gender. The predicate "reported" is on average. This is mistake. We fix: The Foreign Ministry announced its participation in the meeting.

EXAMPLE 5. Moskovsky Komsomolets published a rating best universities countries.

In the sentence, the phrase "Moskovsky Komsomolets" is the subject, this is a conditional Russian name, a masculine word, like the word "Komsomolets". The predicate "printed" is in the feminine. This is mistake. We correct: Moskovsky Komsomolets published a rating of the best universities in the country.

EXAMPLE 6. Tbilisi attracts tourists .

In the sentence, the word "Tbilisi" is the subject, it is an invariable code name. It is a masculine word, like the word "city". The predicate "attract" is plural. This is mistake. We fix: Tbilisi attracts tourists. 

B) Coordination of the predicate with the subject with the meaning of the profession

With a masculine noun denoting a profession, position, rank, etc., the predicate is put in the masculine gender, regardless of the gender of the person in question. For example: the teacher made a report, the director called an employee

FROM proposals will be wrong, in which the teacher made a report, the director called an employee .

Note: if there is a person's own name, especially a surname, in which the indicated words act as applications, the predicate is consistent with the proper name: Teacher Sergeeva gave a lecture. More on this point below, 7.3.5

7.3.5 Subject is appendix

An application is a definition expressed by a noun that agrees with the word being defined in the case: city ​​(what?) Sochi, bird (what?) hummingbird, website (what?) "ReshuEGE"

As a general rule, the predicate is consistent with the subject, and the presence of latest application in the form of another gender or number does not affect the agreement

For example: The plant, this grand colossus, seemed to be a ship of unheard-of dimensions too. The suggestion would be wrong. The plant, this grandiose colossus, it seemed, was also a ship of unheard of dimensions. .

If the subject has an application, then, first of all, it is necessary to find out which of the words is the subject and which is the application, and then put the predicate in one way or another.

Table 1. Application and subjects are written separately. When combining a generic name and a specific or specific and individual subject, the word denoting a broader concept is considered, and the predicate is consistent with it. Here are some examples:

Application is a common noun:

the rose flower smelled marvelously; the oak tree has grown; kharcho soup is cooked

Application - proper noun

the Dnieper river has flooded; newspaper "Moscow's comsomolets" came out; Barbos dog barked

Exception: last names of people. In pairs, engineer Svetlova reported, Doctor of Science Zvantseva came out, head teacher Marina Sergeevna noted proper nouns are subject.

Table 2. The subject is compound noun, forms terms, in which one part resembles an application in function. In these cases, the leading (defined) word is the word that expresses a broader concept or specifically designates an object.

The predicate agrees with the first word, both words change

an armchair-bed stood in the corner; the factory-laboratory fulfilled the order; invoice issued in a timely manner; theater-studio brought up a lot of actors; attention was attracted by a table-poster; romance song became very popular

The predicate agrees with the second word, the first word does not change:

cafeteria is open(dining room is a broader concept); vending machine open(in this combination the carrier specific meaning stands part of the diner); raincoat tent lay(tent in the form of a raincoat, not a raincoat in the form of a tent); "Roman-newspaper" was published in large circulation(newspaper is a broader name).

EXAMPLE 1 ice cream cake cut into equal pieces .

The compound noun "ice cream cake" after the main, more general word "cake" is masculine, therefore: Ice cream cake cut into equal parts

EXAMPLE 2 The story "Children of the Underground" was written by V.G. Korolenko. .

The conditional name is an application, so you need to coordinate the predicate with the word "story": The story "Children of the Underground" was written by V.G. Korolenko.

EXAMPLE 3 A tiny dog, quite a puppy, suddenly barked loudly. .

The subject is the word "dog", it is feminine, therefore: A tiny dog, quite a puppy, suddenly barked loudly.

EXAMPLE 4 Yesterday the young teacher Petrov gave his first lecture. .

The subject is the surname "Petrova", it is feminine, therefore: Yesterday, the young teacher Petrova gave her first lecture.

A) The sentence has homogeneous subjects and one predicate

If the predicate refers to several subjects, not connected by unions or connected by a connecting union, then the following forms of coordination apply:

The predicate after homogeneous subjects is usually plural:

Industry and Agriculture in Russia are steadily developing.

Predicate, preceding homogeneous subject, usually agrees with the nearest one:

In the village there was a clatter and screams

If there are divisive or opposing unions between the subjects, then the predicate is put in the singular.

Experienced fear or instant fright in a minute seems both funny, and strange, and incomprehensible. Not you, but fate is to blame.

Consider sentences with errors:

EXAMPLE 1 Passion for sports and a tough daily routine did their job. .

Two subjects, the predicate comes after a series of homogeneous members, so it must be in the plural: Passion for sports and a tough daily routine did their job.

EXAMPLE 2 Not reason, but fear suddenly took possession of me. .

Two subjects, with the union a, the predicate must therefore be in the singular: Not reason, but fear suddenly took possession of me.

EXAMPLE 3 In the distance, the familiar noise and loud voices could be heard. .

Two subjects, the predicate is in front of a number of homogeneous members, therefore it should be in the singular: In the distance there was a familiar noise and loud voices.

B) The combination in the subject of a noun in the nominative case with a noun in the instrumental case (with the preposition c) like “brother and sister”

Setting the predicate in the plural or singular depends on what meaning is given to the phrase: joint action or separate.

When combined in the subject of a noun in the nominative case with a noun in instrumental(with the preposition c) like "brother and sister" the predicate is put:

in plural, if both named objects (persons) act as equal action producers(both are subject);

Pasha and Petya had been waiting for their mother's return for a long time and were very worried.

in the singular, if the second object (person) accompanies the main producer of the action ( is an addition):

The mother and child went to the clinic. Nicholas with younger sister came last.

Only in the singular in the presence of the words TOGETHER, TOGETHER:

My father left the city with his mother.

Only in the singular with the subject expressed by the pronoun I, YOU

I will come with a friend; you had a fight with your mom

Consider sentences with errors:

EXAMPLE 1 My brother and his friends went to the beach. .

With the word "together" the predicate cannot be plural: My brother and his friends went to the beach.

EXAMPLE 2 Ruslan and I will come to class today. .

With the subject I (+ someone else), the predicate cannot be plural: Ruslan and I will come to class today. Or: Ruslan and I will come to class today.

EXAMPLE 3 You and your sister will live in this room. .

With the subject you (+ someone else), the predicate cannot be plural: You and your sister will live in this room.Or: You and your sister will live in this room..

C) an error in constructing a sentence with a gerund in sentence 7 is that the actors performing the main action and the action indicated by the gerund do not match. We need to completely redesign the proposal.

The sentence can be rearranged as follows: When I finished (l, la) reading, something turned over in my soul.

Rule 7.8.1 TYPE 3

7.8. USE OF GENERAL PARTICIPLES. ERRORS IN USE

INTRODUCTION

A participle turnover is a participle with dependent words.

The gerund always denotes an additional action that occurs in parallel with the main one, for example: a man walked (the main action), waving your arms(additional, what while doing); the cat fell asleep (main action), tucking its paws (additional action, what did you do?)

The participles answer the question what do you do? (imperfect view) and having done what? (perfect view). Along with this question, you can also ask questions as? how? for what purpose? and the like. A gerund always denotes a sign of an action, that is, it describes how the main action takes place.

We classify all types of possible grammatical errors when using adverbial phrases.

7.8.1 Participle turnover in a sentence with a subject

The general rule for using adverbial phrases is as follows: the gerund and the predicate must denote the actions of the same person, that is, the subject. This person performs two actions: one main, the second additional. The participle should easily be replaced by the second verb: sat down, laid out textbooks - sat down and laid out; looked, smiling - looked and smiled.

TYPE 1. A gerund and a verbal predicate expressed by a verb without the postfix -sya

Slipping on ice I was picked up by a guy next to me.

Passing under the house, an icicle almost fell on me.

In each of the sentences, there were two characters: in the first one, someone slipped and someone picked it up; in the second: someone passed and someone almost fell down. But due to an error in construction, it turns out that the guy picked up, slipping; the icicle nearly fell off as it passed.

With this construction, the participle is erroneously assigned to one actor, and the predicate to another, which violates the basic rule. To avoid mistakes, you need to ensure that the participle and the predicate refer to the same person.

When I slipped on the ice, I was picked up by a guy next to me.

When I was walking under the house, an icicle almost fell on me.

TYPE 2. The gerund refers to the predicate in the form of a short passive participle

Writing a poem "Death of a Poet", the fate of Lermontov was determined.

Analyzing the text, I was quite right in determining its size.

As in type 1, the participle and the predicate refer to different persons. Due to a construction error, it turns out that fate was determined by writing ; the size is determined having analyzed. The predicate is a short passive participle.

If the predicate is expressed by a short participle, then the subject itself does not perform the action, something is done with it. With this form of the predicate gerund, there can be no.

Here are the revised proposals:

When Lermontov wrote the poem "The Death of a Poet", his fate was determined.

When I analyzed poetic text, I was quite right to determine its size.

TYPE 3. The adverbial phrase is attached to the predicate-reflexive verb in the passive meaning, which has a postfix Xia

Consider sentences with a grammatical error.

Usually, creating your work, it expresses Xia author's attitude to life and people.

Having received an education, students direct Xia senior master for practice.

As in type 2, the subject in such a sentence does not actually perform the action itself: attitude expresses Xia(by someone); displays Xia(by someone); direct Xia(by someone). But a if there is no action, then there can be no additional, additional, expressed by a gerund. We replace the adverbial turnover with a subordinate clause.

Here are the revised proposals:

Usually, when a work is created, the author's attitude to life and people is expressed in it. Or: Creating a work, the author always expresses his attitude to life and people.

When students receive their education, they are directed by the senior master to practice.

7.8.2. Participle turnover in a sentence without a subject

It often happens that the subject performing both actions may not be formally expressed, that is, there is no subject in the sentence. In this case, we are talking about one-part proposals. It is these types that cause the greatest difficulty in finding an error.

TYPE 4. Participle turnover in an impersonal sentence (except for type 7)

Consider sentences with a grammatical error.

Sending a rather important telegram I didn't have enough money.

He was sad.

There is no subject, the acting person is expressed by a pronoun to me(this is the dative case). The use of participles in impersonal sentences is unacceptable. It is possible: either to make a subordinate clause from the adverbial clause, or to make the usual one from the impersonal, with the subject.

The exception is sentences with an infinitive verb, see type 7.

Here are the revised proposals:

When I sent a rather important telegram, I did not have enough money.

Refusing to experiment he experienced sadness.

TYPE 5. Participle turnover in an indefinite personal sentence

Consider sentences with a grammatical error.

Having received a good education , Griboedov was sent as a secretary diplomatic mission to Persia.

Didn't finish the report, the head of the department was offered to go on a business trip.

There can be no adverbial turnover with the subject, if it is not defined. This situation occurs in indefinite personal sentences with the verb in the past tense plural.

Who directed? who received? who suggested? who did not finish the report? Unclear. We replace the turnover with a subordinate clause or restructure it so that it is clear who received an education and who completed the report.

Here are the revised proposals:

When Griboedov received a good education, he was sent as secretary of a diplomatic mission in Persia.

Without finishing the report, the head of the department received an offer to go on a business trip.

7.8.3. Participle turnover in a sentence without a subject. Permitted tricks.

Due to the fact that the assignments may also contain correct sentences with adverbial phrases, we consider it important to place a table with such examples and such rules that are not found in erroneous ones. Everything in this table is allowed.

TYPE 6. The adverbial phrase refers to a verb in the imperative mood

When crossing the street, carefully follow the traffic.

Having received the task for the adverbial turnover, check if it contains a request, order or advice.

There is no subject in sentences. But it is allowed to use participial phrases in such sentences where the verb is used in the imperative mood: follow, go, write, search and so on. It turns out that both the turnover and the predicate refer to one person, to whom we advise to do something. Easy to substitute a pronoun you: you follow by passing; you check when you receive it.

TYPE 7. The adverbial turnover refers to the infinitive

Consider sentences without errors.

walking along autumn forest , it is pleasant to inhale the intoxicating aroma of fallen leaves.

When handing over the work, it should be carefully checked.

Given that there is no subject (impersonal sentence) it is permissible to use a participial turnover if it refers to the infinitive: walking, inhale; reading, sit; dreaming, dozing; napping, dreaming.

Not all manuals allow this rule: in some of them, the infinitive must be required, it is possible, it is necessary, others follow (the so-called modal words). In any case, sentences like: rewriting, it should be noted; having begun, it is necessary to finish; having received, it is necessary to do, will be ERROR-FREE.

TYPE 8. Participle turnover in a definite-personal or generalized-personal sentence

Consider sentences without errors.

Gathering at the family table in the house of parents, we always remember grandmother's pies and tea with viburnum and mint.

Planning your upcoming vacation carefully calculate the family budget.

There is no subject, but the sentence definitely personal, it is easy to substitute the pronoun we. You can turn! It refers to the implied person: we remember when we gather; we calculate by planning.

D) incorrect construction of a sentence with a participial turnover - in sentence 1: the participle has an incorrect ending, is not consistent with the main word. Let's correct the error: The impossibility of returning to the old order after the war of 1812 was widely felt in a society (what?) that had experienced a national upsurge.

Rule 7.1.1 paragraph

7.1. USE OF PARTICIPIAL TERMS

INTRODUCTION

Participle turnover is a participle with dependent words. For example, in the sentence Graduates who successfully pass the exam become applicants

word Graduates- main word

surrendered - communion,

those who passed (how?) successfully and passed (what?) the exam are participle dependent words.

Thus, the participial turnover in this sentence is - successfully passed the exam. If you change the word order and write the same sentence differently by placing a turnover before main word ( Successfully passed the exam Graduates become applicants), only the punctuation will change, and the turnover remains unchanged.

Very important: before starting work with task 7 for finding errors in a sentence with a participle, we advise you to solve and study task 16, which tests the ability to put commas with correctly constructed participial and adverbial phrases.

The purpose of the task is to find one such sentence in which the grammatical norms when using the participle. Of course, the search must begin with finding the sacrament. Remember that the sacrament you are looking for must certainly be in full form: short form never forms a participial turnover, but is a predicate.

To successfully complete this task, you need to know:

  • rules for coordinating the participle and the main (or defined) word;
  • the rules for the location of the participial turnover in relation to the main word;
  • tense and type of participles (present, past; perfect, imperfect);
  • participle pledge (active or passive)

We draw attention to that that in a sentence with a participial turnover, not one, but two or even three errors can be made.

Note for teachers: keep in mind that the authors of various manuals have different points of view on the classification, as well as on the types of errors that can be attributed to a certain type. The classification adopted at RESHU is based on the classification of I.P. Tsybulko.

We classify all types of possible grammatical errors when using participial turnover.

7.1.1 Violation of the agreement of the participle with the word being defined

The rule according to which single participles (as well as those included in the participle) are consistent with the main (= defined) word, requires setting the participle in the same gender, number and case as the main word:

About children (what?) returning from a trip; for the exhibition (what?) being prepared in the museum.

Therefore, we simply find a sentence in which there is full communion, and its ending does not match (or) gender, (or) case, (or) number of the main word.

Type 1, the lightest

Consider sentences with a grammatical error.

I got to chat with the guests present at the opening of the exhibition.

What is the reason for the error? The participle is not consistent with the word to which it must obey, that is, the ending must be different. We put the question from the noun and change the ending of the participle, that is, we agree on the words.

I had a chance to chat with guests(what IMI?), those present at the opening of the exhibition.

In these examples, the noun and its participle stand side by side, the error is easily seen. But this is not always the case.

type 2, harder

Consider sentences with a grammatical error.

I want to find the words to the song heard recently.

These sentences contain two nouns: author, books; lyrics. Which of them has a participle turnover attached to it? We think about meaning. What was published, the author or his book? What do you want to find, words or a song?

Here's the corrected version:

I want to find the lyrics of the song (which one?), heard recently.

Type 3, even harder

The endings of participles sometimes perform a very large semantic mission. We think about the meaning!

Let's compare two sentences:

The noise of the sea (which one?), which woke me up, was very strong. What woke up? It turns out that the sea. The sea cannot wake up.

The noise (what?) of the sea that woke me up was very strong. What woke up? Turns out it's noise. And the noise can wake up. This is the correct option.

I heard the heavy steps (what?) of a bear, chasing me. Footsteps cannot pursue.

I heard the heavy steps of a bear (what?), haunting me. The bear can chase. This is the correct option.

Children of employees (which ones?), having any diseases receive preferential vouchers to the sanatorium. The participle “having” refers to the word “employees”. It turns out that employees will have diseases, and the children of sick employees will receive vouchers. This is not the right option.

Children (what?) of employees, having any disease receive preferential vouchers to the sanatorium. The participle "having" refers to the word "children", and we understand that it is the children who have diseases and they need vouchers.

4 type, variant

Often there are sentences in which there are phrases of two words, the first of which is part of the whole, indicated by the second, for example: each of their participants, one of all, any of those named, some of them, some of the gifts.. A participial phrase can be attached to each of the nouns, depending on the meaning: in such phrases, the participle (participial phrase) can be agreed with any word. It will be a mistake if the sacrament "hangs" and has no connection with any of the words.

Consider sentences with a grammatical error.

Each participant who received maximum amount points, the right to perform one more number was granted.

The sacrament can be agreed with both the word "to each" and the word "participants".

To each (what?) of the participants, who received the maximum number of points, was granted the right to perform one more number

Each of the participants (which THEM?), who received the maximum number of points, was granted the right to perform one more number.

We draw attention to the fact that it will be a mistake to disagree with OR with the first word, OR with the second:

Incorrect: Each of the participants who received ... or Each of the participants who received ... This is not possible.

In explanations on DECIDE, the option of agreement with the ending THEM is more often used.

Similarly true: Part of the books (which THEM?), received as a gift will go as a gift.

Or Part (what) of books, received as a gift will go as a gift.

Incorrect: Part of the books received as a gift will go as a gift.

NOTE : this type of error when checking essays is considered a matching error.

7.1.2 Participle construction and place of the main word

In well-formed sentences with participial turnover the main (or defined word) cannot be inside the participial turnover. His place is either before or after him. Remember that this depends on the placement of punctuation marks !!!

Consider sentences with a grammatical error.

Submissions must be carefully checked the documents for examination.

We walked through the littered alley fallen leaves.

presenter the outside the city was free.

Created novel young author caused lively controversy.

note: with this construction of the sentence, it is completely incomprehensible whether to put a comma.

Here's the corrected version:

Must be carefully checked the documents, submitted for examination. Or: You need to carefully check submitted for examination the documents.

We walked along alley, strewn with fallen leaves. Or: We walked along strewn with fallen leaves alley.

The outside leading to the city was free. Or: Leading to the city the outside was free.

7.1.3. Participle turnovers, including irregular forms of participles

In accordance with the norms of the formation of participles, in the modern Russian literary language, the forms of participles in -sch, formed from perfective verbs with the meaning of the future tense, are not used: there are no words pleasing, helping, reading, able. In the opinion of the editors of DECIDE, such erroneous forms should be presented in task 6, but, since I.P. Tsybulko has similar examples, we consider it important to note this type too.

Consider sentences with a grammatical error.

Until I found human, able to help me.

A valuable prize awaits participant, finding the answer to this question.

These sentences need to be corrected, because future participles are not formed from perfective verbs. Participles do not have a future tense..

Here's the corrected version:

We replace the non-existent participle with a verb in the conditional mood.

Until I found someone who can help me.

A valuable prize awaits the person who finds the answer to this question.

7.1.4. Participle turnovers, including irregular forms of pledge of participles

This type of error was in the USE assignments of past years (until 2015). In the books of I.P. Tsybulko 2015-2017 there are no such tasks. This type is the most difficult to recognize, and the error is due to the fact that the participle is used in the wrong voice, in other words, the real is used instead of the passive.

Consider sentences with a grammatical error.

The documents, sent for examination

Competition, hosted by the organizers

Foam, pouring into the bath, has a pleasant aroma.

Here's the corrected version:

The documents, sent for examination must be carefully checked.

Competition, organized by the organizers very much liked by the participants.

The foam that we pour into the bath has a pleasant aroma.

E) the error in constructing a sentence with homogeneous members in sentence 4 is that the parts of the double union are NOT in front of homogeneous members.

Let's rearrange the first part: Nature NOT ONLY heals the human soul, BUT ALSO can be blind and cruel to him.

Rule paragraph 7.4.6

7.4. FEATURES OF USING COMPLEX OFFERS

INTRODUCTION

As you know, there are three types of complex sentences: compound, compound and non-union. Each of these types has its own semantic and grammatical features associated with the presence or absence of the union, the meaning of the union, the order of the parts and intonation. Compound and non-union sentences are the simplest and most understandable in their structure. Complex sentences have rich possibilities for a detailed presentation of thoughts, means of subordinating communication are able to express shades of relationships between grammatical parts. At the same time, the more complex structure of such sentences becomes one of the reasons for the violation of syntactic norms when they are used. To avoid grammatical errors in complex sentences, you must remember the following rules.

7.4.1. In sequential submission, the same words should not be repeated. It was this violation that helped

S. Ya. Marshak to achieve comic effect in a famous poem:

Here is a dog without a tail

Who pats the cat by the collar,

Which scares and catches a tit,

Which deftly steals wheat,

Which is stored in a dark closet

In the house that Jack built.

Use different conjunctions, different types of subordinate clauses, replace them with participial phrases to avoid such annoying repetitions. For example: I had to go to the city where my parents used to live, who came to it in 95, which was a real test for them. This is a very bad suggestion. We fix: I had to go to the city where my parents used to live, who came to it in 95: this year was a real test for them.

7.4.2 Subordinating and coordinating conjunctions must not be used at the same time for connection between main and subordinate: As soon as lightning flashed, but suddenly hail began to fall. To correct this sentence, you must leave one of the unions: Only lightning flashed, but suddenly hail began to fall or As soon as lightning flashed, hail suddenly fell.. In the first sentence, the union “how” was removed, in the second, the union “but”.

7.4.3 Subordinating and coordinating conjunctions that are close in meaning cannot be repeated: Parents say we don't help around the house at all. To express syntactic relations, one union is enough: Parents say we don't help around the house at all. The union "as if" was removed from the second sentence. Possibly in another way: Parents are angry, as if we do not help around the house at all. The choice of union always depends on the meaning that we want to add to our statement.

In the book "A Handbook of Spelling and Literary Editing for the Press" D.E. Rosenthal writes about it this way:

"there is a pleonastic use of unions (staging a number of unambiguous unions), for example: "The conditions for a further rise in animal husbandry on a number of collective farms were evident, but nevertheless, a turning point has not yet come", noting that this is an error.

7.4.4. Do not skip the necessary demonstrative words in the main sentence. Mom always went to stores where groceries were cheaper. This sentence will receive grammatical and semantic completeness if the necessary demonstrative word is added to the main part: Mom always went to THAT (SUCH) stores where products were cheaper.

7.4.5. The use of the union what in the subordinate part in the presence of a particle whether is a gross error: We did not hear that he had come to the appointed place.. Correct option: We did not hear if he came to the appointed place.

7.4.6. wrong shape index words in subordinate clauses or they are not needed at all - also a mistake.

The article raises the issue of... That's right: the problem of WHAT? WHAT is raised? mercy, compassion...

This mistake is connected not so much with the structure of the complex sentence, but with the norms of management. It is absolutely necessary to know which verb or noun governs which forms of nouns and pronouns. For example:

We were worried (for that / about) that the weather would not deteriorate. True "ABOUT THAT"

The heroine of the story is worried (about that / that) that she does not find support. Correct: "TEM"

Here is a list of commonly used turns in which mistakes are made. The right questions are given. This list is far from complete.

Faith in what

Confidence in what

Worthy of what

Full of what

Do not rejoice at anyone

Summarize what

Need for what

contempt for whom

full of what

to shun what

Characteristic for whom, what

Convinced of what

Typical for whom, what

Full of what

marvel at what

Admire who, what

7.4.7. Incorrect word order in a sentence, in which the subordinate clause can be attributed to different words, leads to misunderstanding and is a mistake.

Let's look at an example: Pupils, performing test tasks for ninth-graders, which were previously considered difficult, began to make fewer mistakes. According to the meaning of the sentence, it turns out that ninth graders used to be difficult. The attributive clause must be placed after the word of the work, it was her tasks that were previously considered difficult. Although this error is easily detected by careful reading, it occurs very often in written works. Here's how it should be: Pupils began to make fewer mistakes on tests that were previously considered difficult for ninth graders.

What is a grammatical error?

Grammatical errors are divided into morphological, derivational and syntactic. Therefore, in tasks there can be no spelling and punctuation errors.

If a word is formed incorrectly, this is a word formation error (mockery, underlining, etc.). And this is checked in task 6. If the form of the word is formed incorrectly, this is a morphological error (directors, higher, and so on). And this is also checked in task 6.

And only mistakes syntactic are checked in task 7. Syntactic means errors in the construction of phrases and sentences, because it is these units of the language that are studied in syntax.

In the 2015-2016 school year, students should be able to see and identify 10 types of errors. In this case, in each individual task there can be combinations of 5 different types. Here is a list of the types of syntax errors that are checked:

1) violation in the construction of a sentence with participial turnover

2) an error in the construction of a complex sentence

3) violation in the construction of a proposal with an inconsistent application

4) violation of the connection between the subject and the predicate

5) violation of the species-temporal correlation of verb forms

6) violation in the construction of a sentence with a participial turnover

7) an error in constructing a complex with indirect speech

8) mistake in using the case form of a noun

9) mistake in the use of the numeral

10) error when using homogeneous terms

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COMPLETING THE TASK

1. If the sentence contains a participle / gerund / word in quotation marks and so on, then this does not automatically mean that an error has been found. It will be exactly like this: in one sentence there can be a gerund, and homogeneous members, and indirect speech. And this DIFFICULT sentence may be perfectly correct. Or maybe there will be an error. So you can't guess...

2. Do not rush to complete task 7 in testing mode. Open tasks with explanation. In the explanation, a specific analysis of the GIVEN in the example task will be given. If necessary, open the RULE link, a link to it will be attached to each of the five types.

3. Pay attention to what is under the type, for example, violation in the construction of a sentence with participial turnover as many as SIX different errors are hidden, one way or another related to the sacramental turnover. That is why it will be indicated: See paragraph 7.1.2 or 7.4.3. This will be exactly the part of the rule that is needed for explanations. For example, what constitutes an error in the use of voice in participial turnover will be written in the Handbook, in paragraph 7.1.3. Point to link rule and read the relevant paragraph.

4. Learn the rule for one type, and only then move on to another.

Current page: 4 (total book has 7 pages) [available reading excerpt: 2 pages]

Text No. 5

Arrange, where necessary, the missing letters and punctuation marks, open the brackets.

Taiga

Sergey chopped down both big and small trees...I (not) paying attention...mania to my new elder comrades...comrades. Each had his own business and tool. But the main instrument here was the theodolite. Even from school (geo)graphy, Sergey knew that theodolite is a (angular) measuring instrument with the help of which ... measurements are taken ... on the ground ... to display ... me ... surface ... on maps. However, he vaguely imagined ... the appointment and purpose of the work of his comrades who turned out to be not at all g ... ologists but (surveyors) topographers. These are the first people who wake up the taiga. In their footsteps p ... go g ... loggers - perhaps ... chiki subsoil. They will say for real ... is it a dead and barren land ... or is there its own blood in it?

This land was called barren ... in old books that were ... in the cloak of the in ... rnat where Sergey studied. Dusty ... sagging ... with beautiful silt ... yustrations inside, they seemed to harbor some kind of mystery of life that had sunk into the past. Sergei loved those books the most. In them there were many races ... travel stories ... stories about the earth. In one of them, he read ... the first lines about his region. The taiga was presented to the author of this essay as a silent forest where there are no n... herbs n... birds n... n...insects. Going deeper into the forest thicket, that traveler ... and always experienced ... a wave of horror. The gloomy ... noy of the desert ... th to ... the taiga where there is no ... one living creature ... only ... the wind ... rushes ... through ... the ridges of the trees ... breaking the grave ... silence ....

Terribly and gloomily, the traveler wrote here ... hic. On both sides ... of the road rise ... huge ... pines ate firs and cedars ... reaching several girths ... thick. In the depths of the thicket in ... the day ... t ... g ... Gan ... trunks of fallen trees, rotting ... there (in) continuing ... lies ... for many years. Dead silence reigns all around. N ... beast n ... birds. Is it only sometimes (somewhere) somewhere in the depths ... not of the forest that ... a woodpecker sounds, breaking the gr ... bove silence ... the silence and the creak of ... a rotten tree in ... stirs up this ... solemn ... silence ... well, nag ... nag ... heavy ... despondency on the soul …

Quest Keys

№ 1

1, 2, 3, 5,6,8,10,11,12, 15, 17,18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32,33, 34.

№ 2

1. There were no stormy words, no ardent confessions, no oaths, no promises.

2. She wanted to remember this town for the rest of her life, gostiny dvor with yellow peeling arches, pigeons in the market, a green sign for a tavern, tea and sugar, every chip on a humpbacked pavement.

3. Will he support him or not?

4. It was sad in the spring air, and in the darkening sky, and in the carriage.

5. No stake or yard for a poor peasant.

6. And the old man paced the room, now humming psalms in an undertone, now impressively instructing his daughter.

7. From the room occupied by the officers, one could hear laughter, then singing, then sobbing groans of the guitar.

8. Alleys planted with lilacs and lindens, elms and poplars led to the stage.

9. Everywhere she was greeted cheerfully and friendly and assured her that she was good, sweet, rare.

10. He saw not only garden plantations with booths and pumps, but also the bed of the future canal.

11. Mom was not only angry with me, but still was unhappy.

12. A whirlwind raged for about an hour and then disappeared as suddenly as it appeared.

13. She is windy not from mediocrity and depravity, from loneliness, hopeless longing for true love.

14. Gray and whitish stones, yellow-green moss, dew-covered bushes of the hold-tree, dogwood and elm were indicated with transparent clarity and bulge in the golden sunrise.

15. The pale gray sky brightened, and grew cold, and turned blue.

16. Kalinich was a man of the most cheerful, most meek disposition, constantly sang in an undertone, looked carelessly in all directions, spoke a little through his nose, squinted his light blue eyes, often took his thin wedge-shaped beard with his hand.

17. On the dried moss, on the purple weeds, on the soft dust of the road, on thin trunks, on the clean leaves of young birches, lay the clear and gentle light of the already heatless, low sun.

18. In a carefree youth, I knew only dense oak forests, streams, caves of our rocks and wild poverty of fun.

19. An uninterrupted rumble, crackling and clouds of smoke hung over the mountain, clouding the sun.

20. Over the mountains, over the valleys, and in broad daylight, and at night, our knight rides incessantly.

21. Let him serve in the army, let him pull the strap, let him sniff gunpowder, let him be a soldier.

22. Lying down with Ilya Ilyich was neither a necessity, nor an accident, nor a pleasure, like a lazy person.

23. Andrei stood neither alive nor dead, not having the courage to look his father in the face.

24. How long should I walk in the world, either in a carriage, or on horseback, or in a wagon, or in a carriage, or in a cart, or on foot?

25. It rained continuously both yesterday and today.

26. The enemy is stabbed not only by a bayonet, but also by an ear.

27. I was entrusted with the work, although difficult, but interesting.

28. Not thoughts, not memories, not dreams wandered in his head.

29. Joyfully, it was young on earth, and in heaven, and in the heart of man.

30. With a sliding motion, like a cat, he either crawled, or slipped, or flew over a traveled road.

№ 3

1. Everything in a person should be beautiful: face, clothes, soul, and thoughts.

2. Handrails, compasses, binoculars - everything was copper.

3. Everywhere: in clubs, on the streets, on benches, at the gates, in houses - there were strange conversations.

4. V. Hugo came out in defense of the Bulgarians. Ch. Darwin, O. Wilde, L. Tolstoy, F. Dostoevsky,

D. Mendeleev.

5. Smile, laughter, and joy, and peace - I forgot everything.

6. Neither a bird, nor an animal, nor a person - no one and nothing escapes the vigilant gaze of a strong, dexterous and intelligent predator of an eagle.

7. Coniferous trees, such as: spruce, pine, fir and others - are called red forest, or red forest.

8. Pets, namely: a horse, a cow, a sheep - benefit people.

9. In every person there is strength and weakness, courage and fear, firmness and hesitation.

10. Long shadows ran from the house, from the trees, and from the dovecote, and from the gallery.

11. Tarpaulin, deck, suitcases, railings - everything was wet with fog.

12. The cart runs, but Yegorushka sees everything the same: the sky, the plain, the hills.

14. There are walls, air - everything is pleasant.

15. And bumps, and moss swamps, and stumps - everything is fine under the moonlight.

16. Everyone: both comrades and ladies - began to assure Belikov that he should marry.

17. Umbrella, watch, knife - all this was in his case.

18. Neither gossip of the world, nor Boston, nor a sweet look, nor an immodest sigh - nothing touched him, he did not notice anything.

19. The spring sun, the local fields - I would be glad to give you everything.

20. Every trifle: a turn of the highway, a branch over a fence, the light of lanterns - everything seemed significant.

21. Everything around was green, everything was gently agitated, everything: trees, bushes, grasses.

22. It seems that I am doing everything to keep up with the times: I arranged for peasants, started a farm, I am learning to read.

23. Both you and I are both decent people.

24. Everything shone joyfully around us: sky, earth and water.

25. Beautiful is the sun, this sky - everything around us is beautiful.

26. She ate no veal, no pigeons, no crayfish, no cheese, no asparagus, no ground pears - nothing that she considered unclean.

27. Hope and hate both disappeared at the same time.

28. Kolya's sons Shura and Misha are all in school.

29. Various vessels: jugs, glasses, bottles - stood on the shelves.

30. But common sense, firmness and freedom, ardent participation in other people's troubles and joys - in a word, all the virtues were definitely born with her.

№ 4

2,3,4,6,7,8,13,14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 26, 29.

№ 5

2,3,4, 7, 8, 10, 13, 14, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30.

№ 6

1. Sometimes, instead of Natasha, Nikolai Ivanovich appeared from the city, a man with glasses, with a small blond beard, a native of some distant province.

2. There was a bookcase in the corner of the room, a gift from my father.

3. Vladimir Mayakovsky, a talented futurist poet, is also known abroad.

4. A good-natured old man, a hospital watchman, immediately let him in.

5. We guys can't sit for hours without moving.

6. Our history teacher, a native of Kyiv, is now working in a rural school.

7. An ophthalmologist, that is, an eye doctor, sees patients in the morning.

8. The conversation was with a journalist, a correspondent for the capital's newspaper.

9. We know Lermontov as a poet and prose writer and do not know him as a playwright.

10. On the street, a boy, a newspaper seller, was shouting something unintelligible.

11. About the exploits of Ilya Muromets, beloved folk hero many legends have been preserved.

12. This boy, named Vilen, is in the first grade.

13. Mont Blanc, highest mountain Western Europe, attracts many tourists.

14. The rest of the brothers, Vasily and Eugene, lived separately.

15. Both of them, as the best students in the class, were awarded medals.

16. Hippo, or hippopotamus, most spends time in the water.

17. The tragedies of Shakespeare, the great English writer, are staged on the stages of theaters in many countries.

18. Her father, Sergei Petrovich, is considered a specialist in the field of botany.

19. She does not know what this feeling is, love.

20. My neighbor, a young Cossack, slender and handsome, poured me some wine.

21. He, a swindler, let his horse into my garden.

22. Two townsfolk were sitting in the britzka: Ivan Ivanovich Kuzmichov, shaven, wearing glasses and a straw hat, and another, Syrian, small, long-haired, in a gray caftan, in a wide-brimmed top hat and a colored belt.

23. The son of poor parents, the grandson of a serf, he recognized the need early.

24. Mukhin sent him, a fourteen-year-old teenager, to be examined at the medical faculty of Moscow University.

25. N.I. Pirogov, a prominent specialist in the field of medicine, left behind a lot of work on pedagogy.

26. His son, a boy of about fifteen, got into the habit of visiting us.

27. A minute later the hostess entered, an elderly woman, in some kind of sleeping cap, put on hastily, with a flannel around her neck, one of those mothers, small landowners who cry over crop failures.

28. So lived Mikhail Vlasov, a locksmith, hairy, gloomy, with small eyes.

29. The new face was Prince Andrei Bolkonsky, the husband of the little princess.

30. An officer, comrade Tushin, was killed at the beginning of the case.

№ 7

1. A few minutes later, the platform trembled, and, puffing, a locomotive rolled up.

2. Hadji Murat shook his head and, perplexed, undressed and began to pray.

3. He sat opposite me, leaning on the railing, and, pulling a lilac branch to himself, tore off the leaves from it.

4. Egorushka emerged from the water and, snorting and blowing bubbles, opened his eyes.

5. Egor's face was covered with fine sweat, and slowly raising his unruly hands, he wiped his forehead with his palm.

6. And, as if responding to the wishes of his mother, after dinner, Nikolai appeared.

7. Thunder subsided in the thicket, but, breaking out into clearings and clearings, thundered even more gloomily than before.

8. Rybin, standing up, caught a sunbeam on paper, which penetrated into the hut through a crack in the roof, and, moving the newspaper under the beam, read, moving his lips.

9. The swell of the sea, like tired sighs, slowly sways us, either raising or lowering our skiff.

10. One should have seen how he managed with a seven-pound piece of dough, rolling it out, or how, leaning over the chest, he kneaded it, plunging his mighty hands up to the elbow into the mass that squeaked in his steel fingers.

11. Making his way to the door, he stood for a minute, listening.

12. The Czech wanted to say something else, but, noticing three people approaching, he fell silent.

13. At first they walked quickly and without starting conversations.

14. A lazy person sleeps sitting, works lying down.

15. Having recovered his breath a little, the deer rose to his feet and, staggering, went to the side, but, not reaching the forest, he saw a stream and, not paying attention to us, began to drink.

16. Having risen on half-bent legs, Metelitsa stood for about ten minutes without moving, vigilantly peering and listening into the night.

17. But, turning around in a minute, I no longer see her.

18. Sergey lay for a long time without moving.

19. Some time later Vyesovshchikov came.

20. He walked along the garden path without looking back.

21. We will act depending on the circumstances.

22. Since Tuesday the weather has changed.

23. The project is designed based on the planned cost.

24. From the lyceum threshold you stepped onto the ship jokingly.

25. He entered the living room dancing.

26. He stumbled and, barely keeping on his feet, grabbed the handrail.

27. Mists, swirling and wriggling, crawled along the wrinkles of neighboring rocks.

28. After examining the patient and prescribing him medicines, the doctor left.

29. A dog ran barking along the wet pier.

30. When, waking up, he looked at the clocks, they showed ten.

№ 8

1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 12,13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20,22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29.

№ 9

1. Despite my indifference, he was extremely attentive to me.

2. Despite my efforts, I could not fall asleep, an endless string of thoughts stretched out, unnecessary, obscure, stubborn and monotonous, like buckets of a water-lifting machine.

3. In the absence of a room for visitors, at the station we were given an overnight stay in a smoky hut.

4. The next day after my return, Pantelei Eremeevich called Porfish to him and, in the absence of an interlocutor, began to tell him, without losing self-esteem and in a bass voice, how he managed to find Malek-Adel.

5. Contrary to the opinion of Chizh, which Mechik also almost learned, Baklanov began to like him.

6. Due to the exclusivity of his position, his actual independence, Khor talked to me about many things.

7. Ivan Dmitritch was always drawn to people, but because of his irritable nature and suspiciousness, he did not get close to anyone.

8. Savelich, in accordance with the opinion of the coachman, advised to return.

9. Tikhon Ivanovich Nedopyuskin could not, like Pantelei Yeremeich, be proud of his origin.

10. Despite the holiday, the garden was deserted.

11. Despite the wind and cold, the birds rushed to their native lands to the north.

12. To the right, somewhere far away, cocks crowed.

13. To the left, under the mountain, above the black Volga, rare lights float on the masts of the last steamboats, wheels thump on the water, whistles hum.

14. Returning from the fair in the evening, I stopped on a hill near the Kremlin wall and watched the sun go down behind the Volga, fiery rivers flow in the sky.

15. From the mountain, along the congress, along the softened clay, among the many streams shining with silver, a long, lean peasant strode broadly, sliding and swaying.

16. On the jambs of windows, in cages pierced by the sun, my birds played.

17. I alone went to catch birds almost thirty miles away, in the Kotovsky forest, on the banks of the Volga, where in the mast pine forest, long-tailed white birds of rare beauty, valued by lovers of the Apollo tit, were found.

18. Having bypassed the city by the field, I came to the slope of the Volga, lay down there on the dusty grass and looked for a long time across the river, into the meadows, at this motionless land.

19. At half past seven, already in the dark, Annensky came to Saburov's trench.

20. One evening, at the hour of her duty, Claudia went into ward 42 without anything to do, just to chat, for which the wounded especially loved her.

21. In the evenings, from tea to dinner, the uncles sewed together pieces of dyed fabric.

22. Two years later, at the beginning of September, I again had to be in the city.

23. The Rostovs remained in the city until September 1, that is, until the eve of the enemy's entry into Moscow.

24. In the absence of another room for work, one has to stay in the old building for the time being.

25. Every time I worked without a break until late in the evening, I experienced severe fatigue.

26. Boats sailed along the reeds, under the trees.

27. We got up very late, at ten o'clock.

28. I stayed here for a week, that is, until Sunday or until Monday.

29. On a crooked haystack, sadly, like an orphan, perched a crow.

30. In the sea, at the very shallows, silver herrings glisten.

№ 10

1. Except for a few willows, always ready for service, and two or three skinny birches, we will not see anything.

2. Father, except for French spelling, seems to have known nothing fundamentally.

3. In addition to predators, daytime eagles, hawks and falcons, various nocturnal owls, owls, and owls also live in our forests.

4. The editor listened to him and, against his will, smiled.

5. Instead of bare cliffs, I saw green mountains and trees around me.

6. In the back room of the house, damp and cold, on a shabby bed covered with a shaggy cloak with a blanket instead of a pillow, lay Tchertop-hanov, no longer pale, but yellow-green.

7. To Kashtanka's great surprise, the carpenter, instead of being frightened, stretched out to the front and made it under the visor with all five of his hands.

8. I was already beginning to think that there was no other place for me than literature.

9. The words that gave rise to our quarrel seemed to me even more vile when, instead of obscene mockery, I saw in them deliberate slander.

10. With the exception of a few minor shortcomings, Polutykin was an excellent person.

11. All summer, except, of course, bad days, I lived in the garden.

12. Black-necked swan has plumage white color, but the head, with the exception of the white eyebrows and three-quarters of the neck, is black.

13. I looked in all directions, expecting to see the formidable bastions of the tower and the rampart, but I saw nothing but a village surrounded by a log fence.

14. Rahim and I cook fish soup from freshly caught fish and both are in that mood when our hearts are so pure and light and there are no other desires except the desire to think.

15. Who, besides the hunter, has experienced how difficult it is to wander through the bushes at dawn?

16. In the room, except for a warped sliding table on thirteen legs of unequal length and four old straw chairs, there was nothing.

17. My driver told me that Yermolov never visits anyone except his father, a simple pious old man, that he receives only city officials.

18. Accompanied by my chilled dog, I went up to the porch, opened the door in the passage, but, instead of the usual accessories of the hut, I saw several tables littered with papers, two red cabinets, tin sandboxes weighing a pood, longest feathers and so on.

19. He undressed as he usually undressed at home, preparing to lie down under a flannelette blanket, that is, he took off everything except his underwear, then sat on a stool and, looking in the mirror, began to do amazing things on himself.

20. He was a decent lazy person and, moreover, extremely stupid.

21. In the dark distance there was nothing but sparkling lights.

22. Instead of a cheerful Petersburg life, boredom awaited me in a deaf and distant side.

23. The entire crew of the ship, including the captain, and the chief mechanic, and the barman, consisted of eight or nine people.

24. In addition to the pretzel, our owner also had a bakery.

25. The plane, along with the passengers, captured the mail.

26. Nikolai had to work instead of a friend who suddenly fell ill.

27. We, instead of telling the content of the story, will present only a short sketch of its main characters.

28. Everyone, with the exception of Varya, loudly applauded the singers.

29. The mood of the crew, beyond usual, was upbeat.

30. All material, including diaries of travelers, is carefully studied.

№ 11

2, 3, 5,6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20,21, 24, 28, 29.

№ 12

1. The road runs like mercury.

2. Cities are like magnets.

3. It rained like a bucket, and everything disappeared.

4. I follow you like an ordinary moviegoer and appreciate your talent.

5. Valya was summoned in his case as a witness.

6. In late autumn, such days are given out, sleepy, gloomy, when a warm fog both lay down in the morning and lies, not thinning until the evening.

7. As a doctor and friend, she did not find it possible to tell him the whole truth.

8. In the valley, the storm roars and howls like a wild beast, and darkens the vault of heaven.

9. This story is nothing but my memories.

10. He looked at Marya Alekseevna and then, as if on purpose, looked at Vera.

11. It was evident that he was trying to leave as soon as possible.

12. The farm seemed to be empty, only the calls of sentries were heard in the darkness.

13. He is like a brother to me.

14. I passed over Alazan, over a bizarre wave, over gray-haired, like a legend, and, like a song, young.

15. The workers were met by none other than the director himself

16. He became famous among the sailors as an ardent speaker.

17. Bobrov, no matter how he peered into the gray twilight, saw nothing.

18. He tried to express himself as clearly as possible.

19. Your offer sounds like a threat.

20. They recognized her as a reasonable, prudent, practical woman.

21. In the blue haze you saw how the metal was dying in the fire.

22. Children always take the play as a fairy tale.

23. As a bride, we love our homeland, we protect it like an affectionate mother.

24. The world lies in full view before me.

25. I did not notice how the stars left, long pale from fatigue.

26. Days, like streams, run into a foggy river.

27. You look like a pink sunset and, like snow, you are radiant and bright.

28. Seryozha watches how the river runs, and cannot help but think about the past day.

29. And I see: wide world lies in the palm of my hand in front of me.

30. For the first time, Lermontov was talked about as a great poet after the death of Pushkin.

As you know, the novel "Mother" was conceived by Gorky as a kind of "gospel of socialism." As literary critics usually write, this novel, which has the central idea of ​​the resurrection from the darkness of the human soul, is filled with "Christian" symbolism: in the course of action, the analogy between the revolutionaries and the apostles of primitive Christianity is repeatedly played out; Pavel Vlasov's friends merge in his mother's dreams into the image of the collective Christ, with the son in the center, Pavel himself being associated with Christ, and Nilovna with the Mother of God, who sacrifices her son for the salvation of the world. The central episode of the novel - the May Day demonstration in the eyes of one of the characters turns into "a religious procession in the name of" the New God, the God of light and truth, the God of reason and goodness. Pavel's path, as you know, ends as if with a "sacrifice on the cross". All these points were deeply thought out by Gorky. He was sure that the element of faith is very important in introducing the people to socialist ideas (in the 1906 articles "On the Jews" and "On Bunde" he directly wrote that socialism is "the religion of the masses").

http://dil.tj/rossiyane/?Maksim_Gormzkii

For whom did Gorky propose this religion? We read the lines about Pavel's father:

<<So lived Mikhail Vlasov, a locksmith, hairy, gloomy, with small eyes; they looked suspiciously from under thick brows, with a wicked smile. The best locksmith at the factory and the first strongman in the settlement, he behaved rudely with his superiors and therefore earned little, every holiday he beat someone, and everyone did not like him, they were afraid. They also tried to beat him, but to no avail. When Vlasov saw that people were coming at him, he grabbed a stone, a board, a piece of iron in his hands and, legs wide apart, silently awaited the enemies. His face, overgrown with a black beard from eyes to neck, and hairy hands inspired fear in everyone. His eyes were especially feared - small, sharp, they drilled people like steel gimlets, and everyone who met their gaze felt a wild force in front of him, inaccessible to fear, ready to beat mercilessly.

- Well, go away, you bastard! he said dully. Large yellow teeth gleamed through thick hair on his face. People dispersed, cursing him with cowardly howling curses.

- Bastard! he said shortly after them, and his eyes shone with a sharp, awl-like grin. Then, holding his head defiantly straight, he followed them and called out:

Well, who wants to die?

Nobody wanted.

He spoke little, and "bastard" was his favorite word.>>

"He earned little," but somehow Gorky does not write what the family needed, what they could not buy. When Mikhail Vlasov fell ill, a doctor came to him and offered to perform an operation - again, Gorky does not write that there was no money for a doctor, for an operation in a hospital. Mikhail himself refused the operation.

But maybe the Vlasov family lived in the basement, in the barracks, in the "bed-room dormitory"? - no, according to Gorky, all the workers of this factory lived in this working settlement in separate houses (they rented them) - and, apparently, the rent was not tense, otherwise Gorky would certainly have mentioned this.

What were these houses? Here is the Vlasov house, a family of three:

<<Their house stood on the edge of the settlement, at a low but steep descent to the swamp. A third of the house was occupied by the kitchen and a small room, separated from it by a thin partition, in which the mother slept. The remaining two-thirds is a square room with two windows; in one corner of it is Pavel's bed, in the front there is a table and two benches. Several chairs, a chest of drawers for linen, on it is a small mirror, a chest with a dress, a clock on the wall and two

icons in the corner - that's all.

Pavel did everything that a young guy needed: he bought an accordion, a shirt with a starched chest, a bright tie, galoshes, a cane and became the same as all teenagers of his years. He went to parties, learned to dance the square dance and the polka, returned home drunk on holidays and always suffered greatly from vodka. The next morning I had a headache, suffered from heartburn, my face was pale and dull.>>

http://az.lib.ru/g/gorxkij_m/text_0003.shtml

A “room with two windows” is no less than 25 sq. m, and the whole house, which means at least 35 sq. m (rather more) is not so bad for a family of three (and after the death of his father, for two) , at that time. Let me remind you that in the USSR even in the 1970s, people were put on the waiting list for housing with a living space of less than 4.5 sq m per person (later less than 6 sq m per person), and housing was given at the rate of 12 sq m per person - almost as much as and it was with the Vlasov family until the death of his father. So in the USSR, even in the 1970s, they would not have been put on the waiting list for housing improvement, and the footage of their housing corresponded to the Soviet standards of the 1970s.

And - where is poverty, need, malnutrition in the Vlasov family? While still a teenager (Pavel), he earns enough at this factory to pay the rent of this separate house, and dress up, and buy an accordion (not a cheap purchase). By the way, let us recall that the action of the novel takes place approximately in 1904/5 - subsequently, both the standard of living of workers and their social security steadily increased.

Well, in those years, the All-Russian Workers' Union of Zubatov operated at many large factories, which introduced workers to both study and culture - but Gorky could not describe such a more typical factory for that time - his novel would not have turned out at such a factory.

What, hopeless and hopeless was life in this working suburb?

It seems not. Here Pavel Vlasov started the right way:

<<And there was something new in his attitude to his mother: he sometimes swept the floor in the room, he made his own bed on holidays, in general he tried to make her work easier. No one in the community did this.

Once he brought and hung a picture on the wall - three people, talking, walked somewhere easily and cheerfully.

It is the risen Christ going to Emmaus! Pavel explained.

Mother liked the picture, but she thought: "You revere Christ, but you don't go to church..."

There were more and more books on the shelf, beautifully made to Pavel by a fellow carpenter. The room looked pleasant. He called her "you" and called her "mom" ...>>

But at the same time, Pavel Vlasov falls under the influence of the socialists. Why are they starting to tease him? Reading:

It's clear. Natural history according to Darwin. They say that it was not God who created man, but the monkeys. It is also interesting that these "mentors" do not appeal to the fact that the workers live poorly financially - as the main "mentor" crest named Nakhodka says:

<<There are a lot of well-fed, honest ones! We must build a bridge across the swamp of this rotting life to the future kingdom of kindness of the heart, this is our business, comrades!>>

Well, his accomplice, the well-known settlement son of the thief Danila, adds:

<< It's time to fight, so there's no time to heal your hands! Vyesovshchikov objected dully.>>

Gradually, these socialists are expanding their activities in the village, printing leaflets. And what about the suburban workers? Reading:

<<Elderly people who had good earnings at the factory cursed:

- Troubles! For such things, you need to beat the face! And they carried the sheets to the office. The youth read the proclamations with enthusiasm:

- Truth!

The majority, crammed with work and indifferent to everything, lazily responded:



Similar articles