Department staff economic security and Anti-Corruption Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Central District of St. Petersburg are conducting searches against the former owner of the Krasnoye Znamya factory, Igor Burdinsky.
Operational and investigative activities are taking place in three objects - Burdinsky's business partner Oksana Lexachenko, where he lives, the apartment of his other partner and in the office of the company "Finance" on Belinsky Street, 9. This building is actually half owned by Burdinsky.
The actions of law enforcement officers are related to the criminal case under Part 4 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (fraud in especially large size), which was excited investigative committee last November, Fontanka.ru reports. As part of the case, a deal is being studied between Burdinsky and his familiar merchant on a guarantee for the sale and purchase of one of the attics in tenement house merchants Gulins on Tchaikovsky Street, 61. For the guarantee, Burdinsky received more than 7 million rubles, however, according to the investigation, "... an unknown person, having no intention of fulfilling his obligations, that is, by deceit, being at Belinsky Street, 9, received cash …".
In September 2016, the St. Petersburg City Court dismissed the lawsuit filed by two more St. Petersburg residents who tried to sue Burdinsky for 8 million rubles paid in 2013 for a similar attic in the same house of the merchants Gulins.
Burdinsky has been involved in the development project in the building at Chaikovskogo 61 since 2005, when the project was approved by the Committee for Urban Planning and Architecture and the Committee for State Control, Use and Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments. According to the plan, the roof of the house with an area of about 800 sq. m had to be completely redone. Also, the businessman was going to remake the former Red Banner factory on Red Cadet Street into a hotel and art workshops for the 2018 FIFA World Cup
However, in 2014, Igor Burdinsky went through personal bankruptcy procedures. According to the bailiffs, at the time of the seven-million deal for the attic on Tchaikovsky, the businessman owed 55 million rubles, and the Office Federal Service The bailiff reports that today his debt is 260.6 million rubles.
In addition, the economic police Central region Petersburg is checking the legality of Burdinsky's appointment to the post of general director of the Corinth restoration company, which is now engaged in large government contracts for the restoration of famous objects in the Crimea. According to preliminary information, based on the results of the check, a criminal case may be initiated under Part 1 of Art. 170 of the Criminal Code (Falsification of the unified state register legal entities, a register of securities holders or a depositary accounting system).
Searches came to the ex-owner of the Krasnoye Znamya factory in the early morning - Saint Petersburg
The entrepreneur owes more than 260 million rubles Photo: Ivan VISLOV
12:34 21.12.2016
TVNZ
Police conduct searches at the former owner of the Krasnoye Znamya factory, Igor Burdinsky- Saint Petersburg
The actions of law enforcement officers are connected with a criminal case on fraud on an especially large scale.
11:35 21.12.2016
St. Petersburg.ru
08.04.2019 IA Nevsky News A massive power outage has occurred in Sudan. Now engineers and technicians are working on restoring power.
08.04.2019 IA Nevsky News
Zenit St. Petersburg mentor shared his thoughts at a press conference Photo: fc-zenit.ru On April 7, the Russian Championship leader Zenit St. Petersburg played a 1-1 away draw with Lokomotiv Moscow.08.04.2019 Petersburg Diary
Photo: The workflow of technologists-restorers // Photo: Korinf LLC December 7, 2016 10:19 / Society
Petersburg company was robbed by order of a Crimean official
Within the framework of the federal target program for the development of Crimea until 2020, more than a billion rubles have been allocated to put in order unique architectural monuments. But the Committee for the Protection of the Heritage of the Peninsula does not intend to give this money to companies that honestly won the competitions.
December 29, 2015 by the State Committee for the Protection cultural heritage of the Republic of Crimea (hereinafter referred to as the Committee), contracts were concluded for the implementation of emergency response, repair and restoration work for 16 architectural monuments for 1 billion 73 million rubles.
Six contracts were awarded to the St. Petersburg company OOO Korinf, three to OOO ArkhStroyCompany, and seven more to Corporation ATTA Group. During the year, they had to study the monuments, propose and agree on emergency response projects and carry them out.
Rock tomography
Employees of Korinf LLC said that the creation of design estimates for emergency response work on six facilities, including the fortress in Sudak, the Swallow's Nest Palace and the 14th century mosque, required a significant effort and time from them. They rented a house in Simferopol where seconded specialists were based. And the head of the construction department of Korinth, Nikolai Sivozhelezov, settled there permanently.
Proudly director of "Korinth" Igor Burdinsky talks about the work carried out in the "Swallow's Nest". The restorers examined the monument, made a tomography of the rock.
“Before us, restorers were limited to visual inspection,” explains Igor Burdinsky. - We, with the help of the Geovist subcontractor, studied the interior of the rock and found that it has an extensive weak zone. We managed to defend before the scientific and methodological council under the committee the decision on the need for further research in order to develop the best way rock fortifications. Comprehensive work was also carried out on other objects.
A fragment of the report of the Corinth company submitted to the State Committee for the Protection of the Cultural Heritage of the Republic of Crimea on the implementation of seismic studies of the Avrorin rock massif, on which the Swallow's Nest Palace is located
By the summer, the design and estimate documentation was ready. The committee agreed on the projects, after which the documents had to undergo an examination of the estimated cost. But it turned out that there was no place in Crimea to conduct a state examination of documents for restoration work, and only after a three-month leapfrog, the State Construction Expertise in Simferopol agreed to do it.
While Corinth was waiting for the results of the examination for three months in order to finally start emergency response work, thunder struck.
Step aside
On October 21, 2016, Corinth received a letter from the Committee on a unilateral refusal to perform and termination of the contract from October 10, dated September 30, 2016.
On the same day, October 21, the head of the Republic of Crimea issued an order: a new procurement will take place for all facilities where Korinth and ArchStroyCompany have been working for nine months
A week later, the sole supplier ( total amount contracts for these two companies - 561.4 million rubles) was the St. Petersburg LLC "Meandr". The contract stipulated the same work and the same amounts as in the contracts of previous contractors.
“We consider the termination of contracts unreasonable, but most importantly, the result of the work of our team is shamelessly denied,” says Igor Burdinsky. - In the contract with Meander, the deadline for completion of work is December 25, 2016. It is impossible to complete in two months research work, which we have done, create design and estimate documentation, go through the approval procedure prescribed by law, and then carry out the work itself! At first we did not understand why Meander agreed to these impossible conditions, but then we came to the conclusion that their actions were planned with the participation of the committee.
"It's obvious to the state customer"
The contract termination letter says: “As of September 30, 2016, the work under the contract has not been completed and it is obvious to the State Customer that the work will not be completed.”
In "Korinth", in turn, they are sure that the delay is due to the failure of the committee to fulfill its duties - officials could not send documents for examination for three months. And the lack of access to the SRO - another accusation - does not interfere with the conduct design work. This permit is issued in a little more than a week.
Moreover, according to the law "On contract system» the customer is obliged to issue a unilateral termination of the contract by a decision, and the contractor has ten days to object or eliminate violations. Corinth was notified of the termination of the contract after the fact, without even specifying whether the decision required by law had been made, which could be challenged in court.
Thus, Corinth, in principle, did not receive the legal opportunity to defend its rights.
By order of Didenko
Arriving in the Crimea, Burdinsky discovered that the house in Simferopol was no longer leased by Corinth - since September, Meander has been the tenant, and Nikolai Sivozhelezov also moved to work for this company. Burdinsky could not get into the building to pick up the documents of his company.
On November 8, the director of Korinf went to Gosstroyekspertiza to pick up the design and estimate documentation made by his company. There he was told that no contracts had been concluded with the committee for the study of these documents, and therefore they could not issue the documentation. The next attempt to collect the results of the work Burdinsky made three days later. And I found out that the day before, on November 10, all the documents were issued to ... Sivozhelezov.
“How could they issue our documents to a person who no longer works for us? - says the director of Corinth. “Gosstroyekspertiza told me that they did it by direct order of the deputy chairman of the committee, Alexander Didenko.”
Object "Mosque and madrasah" (Mikhrab). Architects-restorers of Korinf LLC take measurements of the object (to create measured drawings)
Burdinsky made sure that the State Construction Expertise gave him a certificate, which, in his opinion, proves that local officials acted exclusively in the interests of Meander. It says in black and white: “On November 10, 2016, at the request of the Minister of Culture of the Republic of Crimea and the Deputy State Committee for the Protection of the Cultural Heritage of the Republic of Crimea, Didenko A.E., the design and estimate documentation of Korinf LLC and ArchStroyCompany LLC was handed over to the authorized person Sivozhelezov ON THE.".
That is, the deputy chairman of the committee, Didenko, ordered that documents belonging to Corinth be handed over to an employee of Meander. There were no agreements between the companies for the sale of documents. However, now "Meander" (if Sivozhelezov, of course, did not throw the result of many months of work into the ditch) has a package of documents necessary to start work, for which no one is going to pay Corinth a penny.
Burdinsky believes that the papers were given to Sivozhelezov in the interests of Meander, who would not be able to meet the deadlines established by the contract without them. He intends to apply for initiation on this fact criminal case.
sister of talent
Novaya's request was registered with the office of the committee, but no response was received within the time limit established by law. We also could not get any explanations on this matter from the committee.
In "Meander" "Novaya" answered extremely laconically. The company confirmed that Sivozhelezov works for them, but stated that they develop all the design and estimate documentation for the facilities themselves. When asked what exactly allows Meander to expect that it will meet the deadlines set by the contracts, the answer was even shorter: “Production capacities”.
Meanwhile, the committee acknowledged that it would not be possible to complete the work on time: “We will not use the funds allocated under this program by the end of the year,” Didenko said in mid-November at a meeting of the State Council of Crimea.
Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Kazakhstan Oleg Kazurin explained that some of the measures for emergency response and restoration work at cultural heritage sites have been postponed to 2017.
Corinth applied to the court of Simferopol with a claim to challenge violations in the purchase from a single supplier; next in line are claims to challenge the termination of contracts and damages.
Novaya will follow developments.
Help "New"
Cultural heritage objects, contracts for which were originally signed with Korinf LLC:
1. Surb-Khach monastery complex (XIV century) at the address: Republic of Crimea, Stary Krym.
2. The complex of structures of the Sudak fortress (XIV-XV centuries) at the address: Republic of Crimea, Sudak, st. Genoese fortress, 1.
3. Palace "Swallow's Nest" (1912) at the address: Republic of Crimea, Yalta urban district, town. Gaspra, Alupkinskoe highway, 9, lit. A.
4. The building of the officers' assembly of the 51st Lithuanian Infantry Regiment, 1910-1913. at the address: Republic of Crimea, Simferopol, st. R. Luxembourg - K. Liebknecht (A. Nevsky St. - Dolgorukovskaya St.), 35-36, lit. A.
5. The complex of structures of the Vorontsov Palace (1830-1846) at the address: Republic of Crimea, Alupka, Palace Highway, 18.
6. Mosque and madrasah (1314) at the address: Republic of Crimea, Stary Krym, per. Chapaeva, d. 5.
Cultural heritage objects, contracts for which were originally signed with Archstroy Company LLC:
1. The estate of P. S. Pallas ( late 18th century) at the address: Republic of Crimea, Simferopol, ave. Vernadsky, 2, lit. D, I, Z, K.
2. The house where the writer A.P. Chekhov lived (1899-1904) at the address: Republic of Crimea, Yalta, st. Kirova, d. 112, lit. A, B.
3. The complex of buildings of the Livadia Palace (1910-1911) at the address: Republic of Crimea, Yalta urban district, town. Livadia, st. Baturina, d. 44a.
Chairman of the Coordinating Council public initiative for the Protection of the Krasnoe Znamya Architectural Complex, Igor Burdinsky wrote a letter to the members of the Council for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage, in which he criticized the historical and cultural expertise of the building of the CHPP of the Krasnoye Znamya factory on Pionerskaya Street, which they want to adapt for modern use. The examination was done by Margarita Stieglitz, and Mr. Burdinsky asked her to withdraw her license. In response, Mrs. Stieglitz answered him open letter. Kanoner publishes both appeals.
Dear members of the Council for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage under the Government of St. Petersburg!
We are writing to you in connection with the problem of preserving the ensemble of the Krasnoye Znamya factory, which was designed by the outstanding architect Erich Mendelssohn and has a global cultural value. Below are the facts that need to be taken into account at today's council meeting (it took place on March 20).
The architectural concept of adaptation for modern use of the dominant architectural ensemble of the Krasnoye Znamya factory - the CHP building - proposed today for discussion by the members of the Council, was made in complete disregard for the approved security obligation No. 40-4 of February 1, 2016 and is a project with flagrant violations of the subject of protection monument. In this regard, the issuance this issue on advice is unauthorized.
The act based on the results of the historical and cultural expertise dated February 9, 2017, specifying the objects of protection of the cultural heritage object of regional significance “CHP of the Krasnoye Znamya Factory”, executed by expert M.S. Stieglitz, contains gross errors, as well as unreliable information about the object. Thus, the approval of this examination is unacceptable.
The public initiative group sent objections to the conclusions of the above examination to KGIOP, which were officially accepted by the committee.
Analysis of two historical and cultural examinations performed by the expert M. S. Stieglitz on objects located on the territory of the Krasnoe Znamya factory, in which conclusions are drawn regarding the building of the CHPP of the Krasnoe Znamya factory (dated September 25, 2015 and February 9, 2017), revealed differences in historical facts and inconsistencies in the findings.
These inconsistencies indicate the expert's dishonest and arbitrary attitude towards the preservation of objects of outstanding value.
Arguments and materials confirming the above statements were sent to the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, on the basis of which the public initiative raises the issue of depriving expert MS Stieglitz of accreditation.
The declared plans for the restoration of the facades of the monument for the football championship demonstrate absolute incompetence and a lack of understanding of the problems of concrete sanitation. The desire to ensure the appearance of the preservation of the object in such a short time is dangerous for the building, the planned work has nothing to do with the concept of "restoration" and contradicts the principles of dealing with objects of national cultural heritage.
When making decisions regarding the Krasnoye Znamya factory, it is necessary to take into account the critical importance of this architectural ensemble for Russian-German cultural ties. In 2009, within the framework of the Russian-German forum "Petersburg Dialogue", a resolution was signed on the complete preservation of this architectural ensemble. Also, in the working documents of the forum, the object is considered as a unifying factor in the history of relations between Russia and Germany.
German experts invited to the round table on the preservation of the Krasnoye Znamya factory stated the unacceptable treatment of historical territory factories. According to the results of the visit of German specialists to the facility and familiarization with the concept of adaptation for modern use of the ensemble's dominant - the CHPP building - documentation is being prepared. And, according to their statement, a protest from the international expert organizations DOCOMOMO and ICOMOS will be sent in the near future.
Dear council members! An unchanging, unshakable condition for determining the future function for such a significant architectural monument is to ensure the historical authenticity of the object, namely the absolute preservation of the internal and appearance building. Taking into account the importance of the Red Banner factory ensemble for the history of world architecture. Each of its elements has an outstanding cultural value. In this regard, the members of the council are entrusted with the responsibility for determining the future of this legendary site and for the preservation of the global cultural heritage.
Igor Burdinsky, chairman of the coordinating council of the public initiative to protect the architectural complex "Red Banner"
Chairman of KGIOP S. V. Makarov
Dear Sergey Vladimirovich!
In connection with the letter from Mr. Burdinsky regarding the situation with the CHP plant of the Krasnoye Znamya factory, we report the following.
The expertise he writes about was carried out by the Northwestern Association of Historical and Cultural Research and Expertise LLC and entered the KGIOP on February 14, 2017. On February 21, 2017, it was withdrawn by the customer of the examination, LLC Mendelson, since the expert M. S. Stiglitz discovered serious technical omissions and errors. Thus, we are talking about a disavowed work that has not been reviewed and approved by any authority.
At the same time, at the council for the protection of cultural heritage under the government of St. Petersburg, held on March 20, a preliminary concept for the restoration and use of the CHP plant of the Krasnoye Znamya factory, made by the architectural bureau Foundry Part-91, was considered. This issue was submitted for discussion by the Council with the aim of collegial development right direction at the earliest stage of design and adaptation unique monument avant-garde architecture. The Council recommended to approve the concept in terms of restoration and continue work on the functional part of the concept (taking into account the clarification of the subject of protection).
The council was preceded by a discussion of problems related to the fate of the entire complex of the Krasnoye Znamya factory, at round table, held on March 17, SPbGO VOOPIIK with the assistance of KGIOP with the participation of a wide range specialists.
In addition, at a meeting of the working group of the council, held on March 15, the issue of including the identified object of cultural heritage - the production buildings of the Krasnoye Znamya factory - into a single State Register objects of cultural heritage of regional significance.
It should be noted that Mr. Burdinsky, being the owner of buildings for many years former factory Krasnoye Znamya, not only did not take real action to save the CHP building, but also sought to exclude the remaining facilities of the complex from the list of identified objects. This did not happen due to the position of KGIOP, the efforts of the public and, in particular, the leading specialist in the field of industrial architecture Stieglitz M.S.
It is surprising that Mr. Burdinsky, who did a lot of damage to the condition of the monument, today acts as its ardent defender.
Alexander Margolis, Chairman of the St. Petersburg city branch of the All-Russian Society for the Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments
Mikhail Milchik, Chairman of the Association of Experts for State Historical and Cultural Expertise, Deputy Chairman of the Council for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage under the Government of St. Petersburg
Until the end of August will determine the date for holding an open auction for the sale of the site, which entrepreneur Igor Burdinsky bought out from Krasnoye Znamya in 2006. In connection with the recognition of his IP as bankrupt in February 2012, all his property, including the complex at the address: Petersburg, Pionerskaya st., 53, will be sold. Bankruptcy manager Andrei Blinkov has been appointed by the Arbitration Court, who is now organizing the auction. In what form the auction will take place has not yet been decided.
IP Igor Burdinsky could not to pay off its debts to creditors, and in February, at the request of Industrial Technologies LLC, the IP was declared bankrupt. According to the press service of Transcapitalbank (the creditor bank), the amount of debt of the IP, confirmed by the court, is more than 2.5 billion rubles: this is a debt to (150 million rubles) and business partners of the IP. Transcapitalbank has several buildings as collateral for the loan, but the bank does not specify whether their sale will be able to cover the debt. The press service of Sberbank could not specify the amount of the entrepreneur's debt. It was not possible to contact Promishlenye Tekhnologii LLC.
But apparently the sale real estate will not cover all the debts of the bankrupt - today analysts estimate the property of the plant at $50 million. Mobile phone Igor Burdinsky, who used to willingly communicate with the press, does not answer. According to SPARK-Interfax, he is the founder of two more companies - HOA "House of Architect Starov" and Premier Stroy Service LLC.
"At the end of August a meeting of bankruptcy creditors is scheduled, where a report on the measures taken and on the current state of affairs should be presented. In connection with the current situation, measures were taken to financially rehabilitate the company, and today some bankruptcy creditors are considering the possibility of concluding an amicable agreement with IP Burdinsky, his press service comments on the situation. Creditor banks refused to comment on the issue of a "settlement agreement" with the entrepreneur.
In 2006, the St. Petersburg entrepreneur Igor Burdinsky bought 4 hectares from the top management and shareholders of OAO Krasnoye Znamya on the Petrograd side, between Pionerskaya st. and Bolshoi Raznochinnaya st. There are three production buildings on this territory. with total area more than 40 thousand m2 and a power substation built at the beginning of the 20th century according to the design of the German architect Erich Mendelssohn. Igor Burdinsky expected to develop the territory as a cultural and recreational space. It was planned to house a museum in the building of the power substation contemporary art.
Igor Burdinsky earlier told "DP" that he was proud that he was able to collect the entire territory in his hands. "Having acquired the real estate of the Red Banner, I, in fact, suspended the sale of this monument in pieces," the businessman said. "I had to spend tens of millions of dollars on this."
Then he said that his partner is a bank, and the amount of investment in the project was estimated at $500 million. However, he never found investors, and the businessman's partner "sank to the bottom" during the crisis.
"On the site you can build multifunctional complex with an area of 80-90 thousand m2 of housing and offices in the loft format. And the monuments can be adapted as an art space," says the investment and consulting director. "The site is well located - on the Petrograd side, within walking distance from the metro. In this area, high rental rates for offices are at least $40 per 1 m2 per month, and housing can be sold for $4,000 per 1 m2,” adds Olga Zemtsova, head of the consulting department.
Majority state buildings of the plant is bad. "I last time inspected buildings in the spring. There are five monuments of regional significance on the territory, including a mothballed power substation, a knitting shop and three workshops adjacent to it. The situation is difficult, but not an emergency,” says expert Margarita Stieglitz. “Engineering communications do not work there - they will have to be reanimated. And in general, not in question dismantling or partial demolition of buildings. It will only be possible to carry out a reconception. And its cost, based on our experience of working on the Proper House project, will be at least $120 million (from 60 thousand rubles per 1 m2),” adds the commercial director.
Not surprisingly, the respondents Developers assess the prospects of the auction for Krasnoye Znamya differently. "Of course, we will study this lot - its price and possibilities for further use. But there are so many ready-made business centers for sale on the market where there are no such big encumbrances," says Andrey Rostovtsev, financial director (the company has two operating business centers). center in the neighborhood: on Maly pr. and Kropotkina street). "But we consider this site promising and are considering it for acquisition. Nearby are our Classic and Premier Palace projects, where sales of apartments are going very well," says the head of the company. According to him, the cultural encumbrances of the project do not matter. "Economically successful art zones in big cities More. We don't have such projects in our portfolio yet," he says.
Meanwhile, the Smolny "DP" reported that the territory of the "Red Banner" may be considered within the framework of the working group on the formation of a list of potential sites for the creation of the first creative quarter in St. Petersburg.
There is no single recipe for success for redevelopment projects of industrial zones for objects with a cultural twist. But their implementation must be transparent and sane from the economic and cultural side. Transparency can provide open competition to the development scenario. By the way, the city administration can contribute to this. Residents should know what will happen in the depressed area, otherwise they will out of habit avoid it. And the sanity of the project, including the economic one, can be ensured by a deep analysis and a business plan, in the preparation of which not only marketers, but also culturologists should take part. If the city is interested in the transformation of industrial areas, the authorities should be loyal to the developers who take on such projects, since their economic effect is not obvious. Assistance can be discussed.
Creative director of the loft "Etazhi"
So far successful examples the transformation of former industrial areas into projects with a cultural component in Russia can be counted on the fingers. We can recall the Danilovskaya manufactory in Moscow, which was turned into a modern business center, the art spaces Winzavod and Garage, as well as the Etazhi loft and New Holland Island in St. Petersburg, which have become fashionable cultural and recreational centers. "We are at the beginning of the journey: we have not even begun to develop the entire territory of the island. The Summer in New Holland programs are temporary. This is a big marketing research, which will help to study the audience, "- modestly remarks creative director"Iris New Holland" Roxana Shatunovskaya.
Select the fragment with the error text and press Ctrl+Enter
The fate of the property complex on the Petrograd side, which includes famous monument architecture "Mendelssohn's ship" is still decided in court. The Privy Councilor recounted this story in detail. And now the time has come to return to the circumstances and defendants of this case. Scattered plot lines gradually add up to picturesque picture where the past and the present are unbelievably intertwined.
Traces in time
Recall that the story began with the St. Petersburg businessman Igor Burdinsky acquired the property complex of the Krasnoye Znamya factory with the intention of reconstructing the former building of the thermal power plant (the famous "Mendelssohn's ship") into a center of contemporary art. But he doesn't have time to work at the factory today. He is busy with lawsuits initiated against him by a former partner - a certain Mikhailichenko, who a couple of years ago participated in a deal where Burdinsky bought, and ZAO NPO Ekros sold several real estate objects in Shkipersky Protoka.
The past of this company deserves special attention. It was formed in 1990 with the aim of "solving the problem of determining supertoxic substances of artificial origin in objects environment". The first stage of its formation fell on the collapse of the St. Petersburg chemical giant - the Krasny Khimik plant. But from the beginning of the 90s, for quite obvious reasons, a large-scale collapse of the industry began, and Krasny Khimik fell into the sphere of interests criminal gangs. Approximately until the mid-1990s, the chemical firms that arose on the territory of the plant were under the control of the "Malyshevites" and "Tambovites". It is not surprising that throughout the 90s, until 2003, there were several contract killings of directors and managers of chemical enterprises.
But Ekros survived (how, one can only guess). In the spring of 2002, it was officially announced that the bankruptcy proceedings at Krasny Khimik ended with the acquisition of its production capacity"Ekrosom".
"Bars" holds the defense
Remembering the "shadows of the past", it is impossible not to mention another "authoritative name" of the late Konstantin Yakovlev (in the world - just Kostya-Mogila). The head of the legal advice office N 24 on Millionnaya Street Yeremeev, together with Konstantin Yakovlev, once established one firm.
Help of IA "Ruspres": The company mentioned above is Veles LLC. In addition, Eremeev Valery Yuryevich established several commercial structures along with a number of other persons. In particular, his partner in LLC "Petor" was Begun Artem Alexandrovich, whom the newspaper "Vokrug Novosti" called personal lawyer of Vladimir Baruskov (Kumarin).
There is nothing criminal, of course, in that. But business ties always oblige to something... However, legal advice N 24, whose employees participate in lawsuits against Igor Burdinsky, is interesting not only for this.
For the past seven years, the Bars motor transport company has withstood the onslaught, in which the management sees a direct raider trail. "Actually works well against our company organized group", - wrote in his last statement to the Prosecutor General of Russia, Alexei Pronichev, General Director of BARS Transport Company LLC. In short, the essence of the conflict is as follows. The Bars company appeared as a result of the reorganization of ATP-34, which survived the financial collapse in the 90s. ATP-34 had decent debts that had to be repaid somehow. Andrey Marinichev was appointed bankruptcy trustee by decision of the arbitration court. His interests in arbitration courts are represented by lawyer Nikolai Davydov. All these manipulations were carried out for the sake of one thing, according to the management of Bars, - the seizure of real estate for their subsequent commercial sale.
All the same faces
However, the history of the ruin of this enterprise (some of the objects of which belong to the city!) Is a separate topic for discussion. Let's stop for now on individual characters who played and continue to play the first parties in this long-term conflict. One of them is Nikolai Davydov, already known to us. For seven years of cooperation with his client, Davydov, apparently, was so imbued with the fate of the ATP-34 that he began to perceive it as his personal problem. This conclusion can be drawn based on the track record of Mr. Davydov, who is listed as the bankruptcy creditor of ATP-34 OJSC (the Petrograd company, founded by Davydov, has recently entered the official register of creditors)! Isn't it strange for a lawyer who represents the interests of someone who "pays off the debts" of a bankrupt enterprise?
Over the years, Bars has sent more than 200 applications and complaints to various law enforcement Petersburg. In their opinion, more than enough for a serious prosecutorial response.
Legal time pressure! - gives his definition of the current situation, Alexei Pronichev, director of Bars. - We have accumulated volumes of information, but for some reason no one shows interest in them.
Igor Burdinsky can say the same for the time being. He has already won two trials against Mikhailichenko. But forged signatures on documents operated by opponents in court have not yet become the subject of a criminal investigation ...
