The very subtitle of the story "The pantry of the sun (fairy tale)" forces the reader to pay attention to the genre of the work. "Fairy Tale" was created in such a way that the real and the fabulous are intertwined in it, and this happens at all levels and at the linguistic level, because the work clearly traces folklore motifs in the construction of the narrative, in descriptions, in vocabulary, and at the plot level, when the motive of saving the hero from imminent death (fairytale motive) is played up by the writer in such a way that this salvation does not cause the reader the slightest doubt about its authenticity; and in the images of heroes - Nastya, Mitrasha, old man Antipych, the dog There is a lot of grass from fairy tale characters- it is no coincidence that the narrator compares Nastya with the Golden Hen, and Mitrasha has the nickname "Peasant in a bag".

However, a clear connection with fairy world does not turn the story "The Pantry of the Sun" into a stylization, Prishvin creates a work that is completely original both in genre and pictorial terms, which describes the amazing and at the same time quite real, somewhere even "mundane" adventures of orphaned children who, however, live just as not every adult will be able to live in such difficult circumstances in which they found themselves after "their mother died of an illness, and their father died in the Patriotic War."

Prishvin in the work "Pantry of the Sun" shows children who live adult life, he lovingly describes Nastya's thriftiness, Mitrasha's skillfulness, he frankly admires his heroes: "And what smart kids they were! ... there was not a single house where they lived and worked as amicably as our favorites lived." The writer with great knowledge of the matter describes how Mitrasha makes wooden dishes, he admires Nastya, who, despite her age, behaves like an adult housewife. But, at the same time, children remain children, and the constant squabbles between brother and sister, during which Mitrasha most often tries to prove that he is "in charge of the house," are also dear to the author, he sees in them a genuine relationship between brother and sister, which they love each other very much, between whom "such a beautiful equality" arises.

The characters of the heroes are also manifested in the way they gather "for cranberries". The thoroughness, the seriousness of the fees, the brother's story about the "Palestinian" that his father once spoke about, the hope that they will be able to find this "Palestinian unknown to anyone, where sweet cranberries grow" - and an absurd argument, as a result of which brother and sister each went his own way in the forest...

Prishvin is remarkably good at describing nature. In the "Pantry of the Sun" nature becomes independent actor, she lives her own life, but she also in a special way"tuned" to the life of heroes. When Mitrasha and Nastya broke up, went their separate ways different sides, "Then gray cloud densely advanced and covered the whole sun with its life-giving rays. The evil wind blew very sharply. Trees woven with roots, piercing each other with branches, growled, howled, groaned all over the Fornication Swamp. "This is how nature expresses its attitude to what is happening and, as it were, predicts that the heroes will face further trials.

The image of the old Antipych was created in fairy tale traditions: the hero is very old, he does not say how old he is, his speech is full of riddles, he knows how to talk with his dog Grass, he keeps some secrets that cannot be passed on to anyone, for their comprehension a person must prepare in a certain way. Dying, he trusts Travka his main secret- Relations between living beings must be built on love, this love must be mutual, it must come to the rescue when living beings need help. It is interesting that Prishvin speaks not only about relations between people, because it is no coincidence that he calls the death of Antipych "a terrible misfortune" in the life of Grass, who cannot forget her master and is constantly looking for him, eventually finding him in Mitrash " little Antipych", whom she saved from death in a swamp.

Mitrasha was in trouble because he relied on himself, forgot about folk wisdom, "Not knowing the ford, he left the beaten human path and climbed straight into Blind Elan." The boy, “sensing danger, stopped and thought about his situation,” but was late and “felt himself tightly engulfed from all sides to the very chest” by a quagmire that would never let him go if Grass had not come to his aid.

If Mitrasha left the "human path" because of arrogance, then Nastya was taken away from her ... by unconscious greed - the girl walked and walked for herself "for cranberries", and did not notice how she ended up where "people do not go." It is noteworthy that, realizing this, she was afraid not for herself, but for her brother, and Mitrash, who was dying in the swamp, heard her desperate cry. Nastya reproaches herself for being greedy, and this moment is one of the most touching in the story.

An understanding was not immediately established between Mitrasha and Travka, but after the boy called the dog that saved him from the quagmire, he was transformed in her eyes, he "shake off the dirt from his rags and, like a real big man, authoritatively ordered ... "- for Grass, he became her master:" With a squeal of joy, recognizing the owner, she threw herself on his neck ... In moments of mortal danger, Mitrasha behaved like an adult, and the living being recognized his right to be called the owner - he became really strong. Confirmation of this is that he manages to kill a hardened predator, and this turns out to be surprising for people who "quit their business for a while and gathered, and not only from their village, but even from neighboring villages... And it's hard to say who they looked at more - at the wolf or at the hunter in a cap with a double visor "...

Children turned out to be not just wonderful children, in them the trials they went through revealed new, completely adult qualities, wonderful character traits. Nastya gave all the cranberries, which almost took her away from the right life path, evacuated Leningrad children, and it was already quite an adult, conscious act that raised the girl even higher in the eyes of the narrators. Although the author reports that the story is being told on behalf of the geologists who discovered peat reserves in the "Pantry of the Sun", it is clear to the reader that the author of the work expresses his own life position that he admires young heroes in which there is so much warmth, humanity, feelings dignity who feel the natural world so subtly and are such worthy representatives of the human world.

Prishvin is a writer who for a long time were not recognized, and his works were not in demand and only in recent decades on this author paid attention, appreciated his work and began to actively study. However, Prishvin has not yet been studied to the end. However, the author great work, including fairy tales, are studied at school. Here we met wonderful work, a fairy tale - a true story called Prishvin's Pantry of the Sun, whose analysis is below and we present to the attention of readers.

Analyzing, we find ourselves in one village, where we get acquainted with the heroes of the work. These are orphans Mitrash and his older twelve-year-old sister Nastya. It's heavy postwar period However, the children manage to survive, because there is also a small farm, and even the neighbors are kind and constantly help, calling the children favorites. From the first lines of the description, we see how much the author loves his characters, he is attentive to them and lovingly introduces us to children who had to grow up early and lay on their shoulders household. Using the images of children, Prishvin shows how hardworking the peasants are and they are able to cope with any difficulty and difficulties.

The plot itself is uncomplicated. The children in the story are not perfect, they also quarrel and make peace, but at the same time they are independent. Once they gathered to Palestine for cranberries. But they didn’t know where to go, so they went at random. Mitrasha also grabbed a gun, because a hungry wolf lives in the forest.

In a word, the children went for adventures and they quickly overtook them. Not finding a compromise solution, the children went different ways and it all almost ended in failure. Mitrasha landed in a swamp, which almost sucked him in, and his sister, carried away by picking berries, did not immediately notice that her brother was gone for a long time and that he needed help. But everything ended well. Mitrasha was saved, the brother and sister reconciled, became kinder and smarter, and even gave all the berries to the children who were evacuated from Leningrad.

In our analysis, I would like to note how interestingly the writer beats the pantry of the sun in his work fabulous motifs. You read the work, and you have no doubt that real life situations. Nature is also beautifully described here, where the author not only describes its beauty, but also enlivens it. So, when children quarrel, the wind begins to howl, as if warning that further trials and difficulties will follow. When the boy approached the swamp, even trees and bushes tried to shield him from danger, densely standing in the way of the boy. Nature is not inactive, but in every possible way tries to help a person.

Mikhail Mikhailovich Prishvin

"To protect nature means to protect the homeland."

M. Prishvin

Mikhail Mikhailovich Prishvin was born on January 23, 1873, p. Khrushchev, Yelets district, Oryol province.

Russian writer, author of works about nature, who revealed in them a special artistic natural philosophy, hunting stories, works for children. special value have his diaries that he kept throughout his life.

Born into a merchant family. After graduating rural school, entered the Yelets classical gymnasium, from where he was expelled (1888) for insolence to the teacher V.V. Rozanov. He moved to the city of Tyumen to live with his uncle. He graduated from six classes of the Tyumen real school. In 1893, Prishvin entered the Riga Polytechnic.

So, the very first book by M. Prishvin "In the land of fearless birds" made him famous writer. A new name appeared in Russian literature - Prishvin. But the road to himself was not so close for Mikhail Mikhailovich, he did not immediately find his face, which we immediately imagine when pronouncing the name - Prishvin.

He wrote many books, tried different genres such as: story, essay, poem, novel, diary. But most of them were written in nature, this can be seen even by the titles of the works:

Chanterelle bread

Zhurka

golden meadow

Forest floors

talking rook

Khromka

Inventor

Guys and ducks

blue bast shoes

Bear

Moose

sip of milk

How Romka crossed the stream

Our garden

Salvation Island

forest owner

pantry of the sun

From childhood, we are taught that nature must be loved and protected, try to preserve its values, which are so necessary for man. And among the many great Russian writers who touched on the theme of nature in their works, one still stands out against the general background. We are talking about Mikhail Mikhailovich Prishvin, who was called the "old man-forester" domestic literature. Love for this writer arises in lower grades and many carry it throughout their lives.

Man and nature in the work of Mikhail Prishvin

As soon as you start reading the works of Mikhail Prishvin, you immediately begin to understand their features. They do not have any political overtones that his contemporaries loved so much, there are no bright statements and appeals to society. All works are distinguished by the fact that their main value is a person and the world: nature, life, animals. And these artistic values the writer tries to convey to his reader that he understands how important unity with nature is.

Once Prishvin said:“... I write about nature, but I myself only think about people” . This phrase can be safely called a backbone in his stories, because in them we see an open and thinking person, with with a pure heart talking about true values.

Despite the fact that Prishvin survived several wars and a revolution, he did not stop praising a person for his desire to know life from all sides. Of course, love for nature stands apart, because not only people, but also trees and animals speak in his works. All of them help a person, and such help is mutual, which emphasizes unity.

Another great writer, Maxim Gorky, spoke very precisely about Mikhail Mikhailovich in his time. He said that none of the Russian writers had met such strong love to nature. Indeed, Prishvin not only loved nature, he tried to learn everything about it, and then pass this knowledge on to his reader.

Reasoning about purity human soul

Mikhail Prishvin sincerely believed in people, trying to see only the good and positive in them. The writer believed that over the years a person becomes wiser, he compared people with trees:"... so there are people, they endured everything in the world, and they themselves become better until their death." And who, if not Prishvin, who survived the heavy blows of fate, should know about this.

The writer put mutual assistance at the basis of human relations, because a person had to always find support in his friends and relatives. He said: "The highest morality is the sacrifice of one's personality in favor of the collective." However, Prishvin's love for man could only be compared with his love for nature. Many works are written in such a way that every phrase hides deep meaning, a discussion of the subtle relationship between man and nature.

M. Prishvin is greatest writer that links nature and man together. Suddenly he says:“everything beautiful on earth is from the sun, and everything good is from man.”

Analysis of the work "Pantry of the Sun"

Genre : Pantry of the sun "-fairy tale. Since very real children go on a very real journey - for cranberries. But they have to face the animated forces of nature - both benevolent and hostile (wolf Gray landowner).

Characteristics of the main characters:
In the work "Pantry of the Sun" the main characters are a brother and sister named Mitrasha and Nastya, who lost their parents, as stated in the work.

At the very beginning of the work, a description of the main characters is given. The external image of Nastya :
“Nastya was like the Golden Hen on high legs. Her hair, neither dark nor blond, shone with gold, the freckles all over her face were large, like gold coins, and frequent, and they were crowded, and they climbed in all directions. Only one nose was clean and looked up.

Description of the image of Mitrasha: " Mitrasha was two years younger than his sister. He was only ten years old with a ponytail. He was short, but very dense, with foreheads, the back of his head was wide. He was a stubborn and strong boy. "The little man in the bag," - teachers at school called him among themselves with a smile. "The little man in the bag", like Nastya, was covered in golden freckles, and his nose, also clean, like his sister's, looked up.

Mitrasha and Nastya were smart children: “ But very soon smart and friendly guys learned everything themselves and began to live well. And what smart kids they were!”

It can also be noted that Mitrasha and Nastya are very hardworking:
"If it was possible, they would join community service. Their noses could be seen on collective farm fields, in meadows, in the barnyard, at meetings, in anti-tank ditches: such perky noses.

In particular, about Nastya, this can be noted in the following lines: “ Just like her late mother, Nastya got up far before the sun, in the predawn hour, along the shepherd's trumpet. With a stick in her hand, she drove out her beloved herd and rolled back into the hut. Not going to bed anymore, she kindled the stove, peeled potatoes, made dinner, and so busied herself with the housework until night.

And in particular about Mitrasha: “ Mitrasha learned from his father how to make wooden utensils: barrels, bowls, tubs. He has a jointer, got along more than twice his height. And with this fret, he adjusts the boards one by one, folds and wraps them with iron or wooden hoops.

Despite everything, Nastya loves her brother: “ Nastya, noticing that her brother was beginning to get angry, suddenly smiled and stroked him on the back of the head. Mitrasha immediately calmed down, and the friends went along the path indicated by the arrow, now not side by side, as before, but one after another, in single file.

And Mitrasha was a brave fellow at all: But not everyone could believe that a boy in his eleventh year of life could kill an old cunning wolf. However, several of them who believed, with a rope and large sleds, went to specified place and soon they brought the dead Gray landowner.
But of course, brother and sister are not at all ideal, correct and obedient children. They argue over who is the boss.
« It happens, and now Mitrasha will remember how his father instructed his mother, and decides, imitating his father, to also teach his sister Nastya. But little sister obeys, stands and smiles ... Then the "Peasant in the bag" begins to get angry and brusque and always says with his nose up: - Here's another! - What are you bragging about? - the sister objects. - Here's another! brother gets angry. - You, Nastya, are bragging yourself. - No, it's you! - Here's another!"

Mitrasha loves to prove his case: « Having checked the direction of the paths on the compass, Mitrasha, pointing out the weak path, said:
We need to go north along this one.
- It's not a trail! - answered Nastya.
- Here's another! Mitrasha got angry. - People were walking, - means the trail. We need to go north. Let's go and don't talk anymore." Because of what later almost drowned in a swamp.

Nastya was a greedy girl : carried away by the harvest of an unprecedented harvest of cranberries, I almost forgot about my brother. "At first, Nastya plucked each berry from the whip separately, for each red berry she leaned to the ground. But soon, because of one berry, she stopped bending over; she wanted more."
“And just to remember her brother, it was necessary, when suddenly Nastenka saw something that not every cranberry gets to see at least once in her life ...”

But experienced trials make children smarter and kinder. « But when from the orphanage of evacuated Leningrad children turned to the village for all possible help for sick children, Nastya gave them all her healing berries. It was then that we, having entered into the confidence of the girl, learned from her how she tormented herself for her greed.

The attitude of the author to the characters : The author treats his brother and sister good-naturedly, since throughout the whole work he speaks of them only kind word. Affectionately calls the boy Mitrash or a little man in a bag, "hunter with a double visor," or Nastya also affectionately calls "hen."

speech characteristic heroes: the speech of the two heroes is colloquial, tk. children use the words "Palestinian", "get along", etc.
In addition, it can be noted that Mitrasha all the time uses exclamatory sentences, which shows his courage and masculinity, for example, "Let him try!"

You can also say that the author uses the sounds of various animals in the work: “Tek-tek! - slightly audible tapping huge bird capercaillie in the dark forest. - Shvark-shvark! - a wild drake flew over the river in the air. - Quack-quack! - wild duck mallard on the lake. - Gu-gu-gu ... - a beautiful bird bullfinch on a birch "

Features of the plot and composition: Prishvin is very attentive to children. He has a gentle sense of humor and big love describes two independent peasant children who are able to cope with a large household. Prishvin, in the images of a brother and sister, affirms peasant thoroughness, love of work, practical intelligence and the ability to deal with difficulties.
The name "Pantry of the Sun" is an ambiguous image. "Pantry of the sun" is not only peat, which can be used as a source of energy. This and all reserved northern nature, this and kind heart people. Prishvin is a great connoisseur and lover of nature. He poetically describes awakening spring nature, the voices of birds and animals, merging into a single magical choir of the Russian forest.

educational value: Prishvin, in his fairy tale, brought up in children an aesthetic sense of admiring nature, because. there is a lot of description of nature in his work. A child, while reading “The Pantry of the Sun”, also develops kindness in himself, because, comparing himself with the heroes of this work, he understands that everything that is not done should be in the name of kindness, not only for himself, but also for others. This fairy tale also teaches a child not to be greedy, because. the quality of "greed" is very clearly condemned in this work.In addition, the "Pantry of the Sun" brings up in children that it is simply necessary to listen to someone else's opinion, otherwise you can break a lot of firewood. In addition, one can definethat this work teaches the child to be brave and hardworking.

Subject:

« THE MORAL ESSENCE OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF NASTA AND MITRASH »

Lesson type: combined

Goals:

• based on what they read, learn to highlight the character traits of the main characters,
• analyze the actions of children, their behavior in nature;
• develop thinking, oral speech, replenish vocabulary.

Tasks:

Educational. Analyze Episodes this work; reveal the features of the genre, the characters of the characters, the writer's intention - to show the unity of man and nature.

Developing. Improve skills expressive reading; develop speech, Creative skills students.

Educational. Cultivate kindness towards each other careful attitude to nature.

Download:

Preview:

1. Synopsis of a literature lesson on the topic "Analysis of the work of M. Prishvin" Pantry of the Sun "for grade 6

Subject: The moral essence of the relationship between Nastya and Mitrasha

Lesson type: combined

Goals:

1. based on what they read, learn to highlight the character traits of the main characters,
2. analyze the actions of children, their behavior in nature;
3. develop thinking, oral speech, replenish vocabulary.

Tasks:

Teaching: - to analyze the episodes of this work; reveal the features of the genre, the characters of the characters, the writer's intention - to show the unity of man and nature.

Developing: - improve the skills of expressive reading; develop speech, creative abilities of students.

Educational: to cultivate a benevolent attitude towards each other, respect for nature.

Equipment: portrait of M. Prishvin, projector, crosswords.

During the classes.

Man must be reasonable in his relationship with nature, understand it, love and protect it.

M. Prishvin

I. Organizational moment.

Hello guys! Let's smile to each other, and let our day be filled with smiles and joys.

II. Motivation learning activities, the announcement of the topic, the purpose of the lesson.

Today in the lesson we will analyze the episodes of M.M. Prishvin's story "The pantry of the sun." Write down the date and the topic of the lesson "The moral essence of the relationship between Nastya and Mitrasha." And for starters, we recall the peculiarity of Prishvin's work, around what did he build his work? (Nature and man, there is a relationship)

III. Work on the content of the work.

1. Literary duel.

Your goal is to answer my questions quickly and correctly.

1. In what year was the fairy tale written? (In 1945)
2. Who is Antipych? (Forester)
3. What was the name of the wolf in the work? (Gray landowner)
4. In a popular way, some excellently pleasant place in the forest. (Palestinian)
5. A marshy place in a swamp, it's the same as a hole in the ice. (Elan)
6. The name of the swamp, near which the children lived. (Fornication)
7. Names of the main characters. (Nastya, Mitrasha)
8. Who saved the boy from death in the swamp? (Dog Grass)
9. On whose behalf is the story of the “Pantry of the Sun” being conducted? (Scouts of swamp riches)
10. The author of the work. (Mikhail Prishvin)

2. Frontal conversation with elements selective reading text and paraphrase.

1) What do you see the main characters of the fairy tale were? Let's try to make a cluster about internal features Mitrasha and Nastya.

3) Why does he call them "Golden Hen" and "man-in-a-pouch"?

(Affectionate nickname " golden hen” gives the description of Nastya a fabulous charm. The effect is enhanced by diminutive suffixes in the words: “chicken”, “legs”, “coins”, “nose”, “clean”, “freckles”. Mitrasha is described differently. The main thing in his description is male, volitional qualities. The nickname “People-in-a-pouch” means that Mitrasha, although not big yet, already has the qualities of a “peasant”.)

(Children had no time to play and have fun. The care of a large household, “about all living beings” fell on their shoulders. The author both admires and is proud of them: “But did our children cope with such a misfortune in difficult years Patriotic War!”)

(The author compares the children with the actions of their parents. Nastya, “like the deceased mother”, “got up far before the sun”, “driven out her beloved herd”, stoked the stove, cooked dinner, “took care of the house until night” Mitrasha “learned from his father "make wooden utensils," he is responsible for all the men's household and public affairs. He attends all meetings, tries to understand public concerns.")

Let's read a short dialogue at the beginning of the story. (p. 121 from the words “Very good ....” to the words “... or plant potatoes.”)

6) How does this dialogue help to understand the characters of the brother and sister?

(Children imitate the behavior of their parents. Mitrasha recalls “how his father instructed his mother” and tries to teach Nastya. Nastya behaves like a deceased mother: she does not argue with Mitrasha, she smiles, he “begins to get angry and brag.” Nastya teases at first, then affectionately strokes his brother on the back of the head. A small skirmish ends in reconciliation and friendly work.)

Let's read the dialogue in roles in the episode "Nastya and Mitrasha are going for cranberries." (p. 123 “Nastya, starting to gather, ... where sweet cranberries grow”).

7) What role does this dialogue play in the further narrative?

(Nastya inattentively listened to her brother when he talked about the “Palestinian woman” in the forest. She has her own, feminine, household concerns, she makes sure that they are fed on the road. Mitrasha has already decided that he will go look for a Palestinian woman. He is a man, researcher, looking for new ways... Thus, the conflict of the narrative is outlined.)

8) What event is the plot of the story?

(An argument, and then a quarrel between the guys, which almost led to tragedy. Reasonable Nastya tried to convince her brother to go along a wide, dense path, but Mitrasha became stubborn and went “on his own, along his own path.” At this point, Nastya got angry, and it turned out that the guys went different ways.)

10) What role does nature play in the development of events?

Teacher comment:

The fornication swamp seems disturbing, dangerous, scary place. Nature itself here frightens not only man, but also the beast. Let's pay attention to how the fox's anxiety and fear are shown: the diminutive suffixes in its description make it small and defenseless.

Here, a dog and a wolf are contrasted - friend and enemy of man: “a feral dog ... howled from longing for a man, and a wolf howled from unbelievable malice towards him.” It was here, in this bad place, that Nastya and Mitrasha, the cranberry hunters, came.

Nature portends evil. Another signal of the approaching discord between brother and sister is a cloud that "like a cold blue arrow ... crossed the rising sun in half."

Anxiety is added by the wind, because of which the “pine groaned”, and the “spruce growled”.

11) What is the meaning of the parable about the fate of the pine and spruce?

(Two trees doomed to live together are described as living beings. Large trees should have grown independently, separately from each other. They grew together, but they are separated, do not help each other, wanting to assert themselves at the expense of the other. The meaning of the parable is that that people should help each other, support each other.

CONCLUSION: So, we examined the relationship of the characters, author's attitude to the guys, dialogues that help to reveal the characters of the characters, the composition of the work, the role of nature in the development of events.

III. Pupils voluntarily retell the episodes, complementing each other.

1 episode - "Mitrasha in Trouble".

How does nature warn the boy of danger?

(“The ground under my feet has become like a hammock suspended under a muddy abyss” - the anxiety is already there. Old Christmas trees scare Mitrasha, block his way.)

(The author likes Mitrasha’s courage when he walks through a terrible forest, his ingenuity when he guesses how to shorten the road. The author worries, worries about the boy, sympathizes with him as if he wants to warn him from danger. The author wholeheartedly cheers for Mitrasha, describing his helplessness” .

Episode 2 - "The Adventures of Nastya in the Forest."

Why did Nastya forget about her brother? How does the author feel about Nastya?

(Nastya came across a Palestinian woman sprinkled with red cranberries and forgot about everything in the world. The author asks: “Where does a person, with his power, get greed even for a sour cranberry?” He does not seem to condemn Nastya, but is only surprised. The author's attitude to children is also expressed through the attitude of animals towards them.)

How do animals react to the appearance of children in the forest?

(Black grouse Kosach does not notice them, “before they were quiet.”)

IV. Group work. Staging of the episode “Quarrel between Nastya and Mitrasha”

(Narrator, Nastya, Mitrasha, crow).

Questions to the class:

1. How could it happen that such friendly guys not only quarreled, but also left each other? After all, they knew that the ruthless Gray landowner was wandering in the forest, that there was a fatal place in the swamp?

Questions to the class:

1. Why did Grass not immediately respond to the call of Mitrasha? p.65

2. What, besides sharpness, courage, patience, helped Mitrasha escape?

4. Why did the almost feral Grass obey the man and come to his aid?

5. What truth did Antipych whisper to both dogs and people?

IV. Conclusion.

So what is a pantry of the sun? (This is not only the Fornication swamp with its reserves of combustible peat, it is all nature and man - the "wise master".)

Connecting the life of people and nature, Prishvin expresses his main idea: Man must be reasonable in his relationship with nature, understand it, love and protect it.(This is an epigraph to the lesson, we write it in a notebook).

Now back to the cluster. Have there been any changes? Are there any differences in their character? And the similarities?

Now we are divided into 2 teams: on my left is the Mitrashi team, and on the right is Nastenka

So, attention to the screen.

V. Homework:

1. Think about why the “Pantry of the Sun” is called a true story?
2. Fairy tale and true story in the work of Prishvin(exploring the text, identify elements of the fairy tale and were)

3. Solve the crossword.

The study of the "Pantry of the Sun" should be seen as a continuation and development of the theme " native nature". The task of the teacher in this case is complicated by the fact that the fairy tale "Pantry of the Sun" is not just a work about nature. IN diary entry M. Prishvin says: “In „Pantrysun“ I wrote that the truth is a severe struggle for love ... "Prishvin creates a fairy tale" for everyone. Its meaning is deep. Just as the sun deposited its energy in peat deposits, the writer put into the “Pantry of the Sun” everything that he had accumulated over long years: good relations for people, love for nature… Truth is not just love for a person. It lies in a severe struggle for love and is revealed in the clash of two principles: evil and love. “A dog howls on one side of the semicircle, a wolf howls on the other ... What a plaintive howl. But you, a passer-by, if you hear and a reciprocal feeling rises in you, do not believe in pity: it is not a dog howling, truest friend man is a wolf worst enemy him, doomed to death by his very malice. You, passer-by, save your pity not for the one who howls about himself like a wolf, but for the one who, like a dog that has lost its owner, howls, not knowing who now, after him, to serve it. 9 .

Evil, seeking to satisfy the predatory instincts, runs into the power of love, the passionate desire to survive. Therefore, Prishvin's fairy tale shines not only with love - there is a struggle in it, in it a clash of good and evil.

The author used some techniques of the traditional fairy tale. There are confluences of almost fabulous accidents and coincidences here. Animals take an active part in the fate of children. A raven, a poisonous snake, a magpie, a wolf named Gray Landlord are hostile to children. Dog Grass - a representative of "good nature" - faithfully serves man. It is interesting to note that the tale was originally called "Man's Friend". All the philosophical reasoning of the author about the "true truth" is placed in the chapters that tell about Grass.

And at the same time, the events in the work have real basis. "The pantry of the sun" was written in 1945, after the end of the Great Patriotic War. And “as early as 1940, the author spoke of his intention to work on a story about how two children quarreled and how they went along two divided roads, not knowing that in the forest, such detours again and again merge into one common one. The children met, and the road itself reconciled them. 10 (according to the memoirs of V. D. Prishvina).

The technique of merging the fabulous and the real made it possible for the writer to express his ideal, the dream of the high purpose of man, of his responsibility to all living things on earth. The fairy tale is permeated with the optimistic faith of the writer in the closeness and possibility of this dream to come true, if you look for its embodiment in real life among seemingly ordinary people. The writer first of all expressed this idea in the main characters of the work - Nastya and Mitrasha.

The originality of the work is the disclosure of man through nature, through the relationship of man to nature. Prishvin wrote: “After all, my friends, I write about nature, but I myself only think about people.”

Possible distribution of material by lessons

Part of the first lesson is devoted to acquaintance with individual facts of the biography of M. M. Prishvin, as well as his works. This will awaken interest in the work of the writer, with whom most sixth graders will meet for the first time. In this case, it would be possible to invite students to read in advance some of his works - stories in the collections "Forest Drop", "Forest Floors", "Golden Meadow", "Forest Doctor", etc., and then, in a short conversation at the beginning of the lesson, express their opinion or read a review about the book read.

M. M. Prishvin was born in 1873 near Yelets, in the noble estate Khrushchevo, owned by his father, who came from Yelets merchants. He grew up among peasant children, studied at the Yelets gymnasium and was expelled from there with a “wolf ticket” for a major quarrel with a teacher. Then Prishvin studied at a real school in Tyumen, passed the exams externally for the course of a classical gymnasium, and entered the Riga Polytechnic Institute. He was arrested for participation in a social-democratic student organization and, after a year's imprisonment, was exiled to his homeland under open police supervision. In 1899, Prishvin went to Germany, to Leipzig, from where he returned four years later with a degree in agronomy. He works at an experimental agricultural station, prepares himself for scientific and pedagogical activity in the laboratory of Academician D. N. Pryanishnikov. But the awakened interest in literature makes him dramatically change his fate.

Since 1905, Prishvin has become a travel writer, ethnographer, essayist. Publishes books. Actively contributes to newspapers. Travels and walks around the country. He maintained this way of life until old age. Prishvin admitted more than once that he embodied in him the dreams and tales of his own childhood ...

In children's literature, Prishvin remained as the author of several collections of short stories ("Fox Bread", "The Chipmunk Beast", "Grandfather's Felt Boots", "Stories of the Huntsman Mikhail Mikhalych", etc.), there were fairy tales "The pantry of the sun" and a wonderful transcription of the autobiographical story of the Canadian Indian Vash Kuonnazin "Gray Owl" 11 .

Instead of a story about a biography, you can read excerpts from the "Golden Rose" by K. G. Paustovsky (chapter "Mikhail Prishvin").

The second part of the lesson is devoted to reading aloud (by a teacher or a pre-prepared student) the beginning of the fairy tale was “The Pantry of the Sun”.

At home, sixth-graders read the work of M. Prishvin to the end.

The second lesson can be devoted to the initial acquaintance with the ideological and artistic features of the fairy tale - they were the "Pantry of the Sun", the characters of its main characters - Nastya and Mitrasha.

The purpose of this lesson is to understand why the "Pantry of the Sun" is called "fairy tale". This question is very complex, so you should not seek exhaustive answers in the lesson. At this stage, students will only indicate what here can be attributed to a fairy tale, and what was. To this end, the following questions are proposed:

1. Where and when does the action take place in M. Prishvin's work "The Pantry of the Sun"?

2. How does the beginning of the work resemble a fairy tale?

3. Remember the artistic images, individual episodes that can be called fabulous. Think about the role they play in the work.

4. What is true in the "Pantry of the Sun"?

Highlighting fabulous and realistic elements, we draw students' attention to the fact that the fabulous elements in Prishvin's work are no more, but no less fabulous than all other images of the work. Therefore, everything here can be called a fairy tale and at the same time a reality. Here it is important to note the peculiarities of the writer's style: when something magical is spoken of, Prishvin will carefully note “it seems”, “as if”, “it seems”, and if we are talking about the real, the writer will definitely emphasize the magical properties of kindness and diligence.

Thus, in the analysis, it is important to focus the attention of students on the fact that in the work "Pantry of the Sun" "a true story and a fairy tale never become different ways, different components of the narrative - the essence of Prishvin's manner is precisely in the fact that they are clearly tangible and absolutely inseparable in every detail of the text " 12 .

The next stage of the lesson is work on the characteristics of Nastya and Mitrasha. Sample questions for conversation:

2. Highlight comparisons and epithets that help to understand the author's attitude towards Nastya and Mitrasha. What, in your opinion, character traits of these children are especially dear to the author?

3. Remember how Nastya and Mitrasha lived after the death of their mother. What kind of relationship developed between them? What do you think was the most amazing thing about their lives?

The main content of the next lesson is understanding the conflict between Nastya and Mitrasha, its causes and consequences; spiritualization of nature, its participation in the fate of the heroes.

To understand the conflict between Nastya and Mitrasha, some methodologists suggest organizing a discussion that helps to arouse interest in what is read, and also contributes to a conscious understanding of the work. The main questions of the lesson: who is right - Nastya or Mitrasha? Which side is the narrator on?

Another way is also possible - “following the author”. In this case, we offer a conversation with a constant reference to the text. Sample questions and tasks:

1. Retell in your own words, and then read the scene of the dispute between Nastya and Mitrasha. Pay attention to how nature behaves. Is it possible to determine which side the author is on?

2. What made Mitrasha go on an unknown path? Why did he get into trouble? How does the author feel about Mitrasha in this story? What helped Mitrasha emerge victorious from everything that happened? Support your assumptions with details from the text.

3. How did Nastya behave when she was alone? Why did she forget about her brother? What does the author condemn in Nastya's behavior? Find artistic image, which helps to understand the author's attitude towards Nastya.

4. Why does the writer insert a story about spruce and pine growing together in his narrative? Why is this story placed before the appearance of the children in the forest?

5. Read the description of nature after the episode of the children's quarrel (from the words “Then the gray cloud moved in tightly ...” to the words “they howled, groaned ...”). Consider how the author helps to understand the meaning of what is happening. What is the author's attitude towards this?

6. Why did Grass come to the aid of man?

It is appropriate not only to specifically recall what personification is, but also to carry out work that will help expand and consolidate this concept. The students give examples from the "Pantry of the Sun" when inanimate objects are endowed with signs of living beings, plants and animals seem to acquire human properties: the black grouse welcomes the sun, the sentry crow calls for a close fight, pine and spruce, old Christmas trees growing together interfere with Mitrasha, etc. It is important to make it clear to students that throughout the course narrative, one can feel the desire of a person to comprehend and animate nature, to make it understandable, close and dear to people.

At home, students should answer in writing one of the questions proposed for discussion in the lesson.

The next lesson after checking homework can begin to summarize what has been learned. the main objective lesson - to determine the main idea of ​​the work. With a system of questions, the teacher will lead the sixth graders to the conclusion that the “truth” of life, its most important meaning lies in the unity of man and nature, in the kindred wise attitude of man to nature. On the example of the main characters, the writer seeks to show the strength, beauty of a person, his power and huge opportunities. The name of the work is associated not only with peat deposits. The author has in mind the spiritual treasures of a person who lives in nature, is her friend.

Sample questions for conversation

1. Why did the writer call his work a true story? What meaning did he put into these words?

After answering this question, it would be appropriate to read the writer's dedication, placed in one of the first editions for children, The Pantry of the Sun, which will help to better understand the meaning of the whole work:

"Content ordinary fairy tale- this is the struggle of a hero-man with some villain (Ivan Tsarevich with the Serpent-Gorynych). And at the end of the struggle there must certainly be a victory, and a fairy tale in this sense is an expression of the universal faith in the victory of the good over the evil. With this faith I went through my long literary path, with this faith I hope to finish it and pass it on to you, my young friends and comrades. 13 .

2. What is the significance of the story of Grass in the work?

3. What meaning does the writer put into the words "pantry of the sun"?

4. What is the significance of the dispute between Nastya and Mitrasha in the work? How is this story connected with the words: “This truth is the truth of the age-old severe struggle of people for love”?

5. How do you imagine the narrator?

6. Read the epigraph to the chapter. How does he characterize the writer?

In conclusion, we can talk about the fact that after the appearance of the “Pantry of the Sun”, the Mosfilm film studio offered Prishvin to write a screenplay based on this work. The film was never created, but the film story called "The Gray Landowner" was published in the collection of works by M. M. Prishvin in 1957.

For independent reading we can recommend to students the work of Prishvin "Ship Thicket", where they will meet again with Nastya and Mitrasha.