Consist of two parts: the first part includes short answer questions and tasks that require a detailed answer in the amount of 5 - 10 sentences. The second part includes 4 tasks from which you need to choose one and give on it a detailed reasoned answer in the form of an essay of at least 200 words.

All demonstration versions of the exam in literature contain answers to all tasks, as well as assessment criteria for tasks with a detailed answer.

In compared to

Demonstration versions of the exam in literature

Note that demonstration versions of the exam in literature are presented in pdf format, and to view them you need to have installed, for example, the freely distributed software package Adobe Reader on your computer.

Changes in the demonstration versions of the exam in literature

Demonstration versions of the exam in literature for grade 11 for 2003 - 2007 consisted of tasks of three types: A - tasks in which you need to choose one of the proposed answers, B - tasks that require a short answer, C - tasks that require a detailed answer.

In 2008 from demo version of the exam in literature were Choice questions were excluded.

In 2015 in demo version in literature was variant structure changed:

• Option became be in two parts(part 1 - short answer questions, part 2 - open-ended questions).
• Numbering assignments has become through throughout the variant without letter designations A, B, C.

IN demonstration versions of the Unified State Exam 2016 - 2017 in literature compared with demo 2015there were no changes.

IN demonstration version of the exam 2018 Literature compared with demo 2017 the following changes:

• The requirements for completing tasks 9 and 16 have been clarified ( canceled the requirement to justify the choice of an example for comparison)
• Introduced the fourth theme of the essay.
• Fully revised criteria performance evaluation tasks with a detailed answer (8, 9, 15, 16, 17).
• Maximum score for doing all the work increased from 42 to 58 points.

IN demo version of the USE 2019 in literature compared with demo 2018the criteria for evaluating the performance of tasks with a detailed answer have been specified:

• corrections were made to the assessment of tasks 8 and 15 (the wording of criterion 1 with a description of the requirements for an answer for 2 points, the rules for calculating factual errors in criterion 2),
• for tasks 9 and 16 in criteria 1 and 2 are taken into account possible options flaws in the answer,
• for tasks 17.1–17.4, the calculation of logical errors has been added to criterion 4.

On our website you can also get acquainted with the trained teachers of our training center "Resolventa"

To date, literature is not the most common subject for passing the exam, because many choose either computer science or English language. However maximum amount person who passed the exam 100 points, has been reported in the literature. According to the new project, demo version of FIPI USE in Literature 2019 confirms the absence changes in the structure and content of the examination paper in literature. The minimum score remains the same thirty two, and regarding the criteria for evaluating a detailed answer, work is underway to improve.

The structure of the tasks of the USE 2019 in literature

The exam will consist of two parts: 16 tests in the first and 1 in the second. The first part includes tasks that imply a short or detailed answer. The next stage is tasks of type C, which require open answers to questions about works. In the second part, the student is required write an essay for one of 4 possible topics. Its volume should not be less than 200 words.

The maximum score that could be obtained for USE in Literature 2019 - 57, and the minimum (32) equates to 8 primary correct answers.

Essay in the exam in literature 2019

The structure of the essay should be simple and clear. In addition to the lack of spelling and punctuation errors, the topic should be well disclosed. Logic, integrity and the correct order (introduction, argument, example, conclusion) must be present along with following the norms of speech and using terms from the literature program.

The introduction should contain several sentences from the biography of the writer or about the history of the creation of the work itself. If a quote is used concisely in an essay, your scores will only improve.

The main part should reveal your personal view on the topic of the essay you have chosen and the answer to it. The formulation of theses and arguments, as well as the author's view on this issue, should be disclosed. It is mandatory to use literary concepts and quotations from the essay with comments on them. The lack of examples can be a significant drawback, so you should always back it up with arguments, quotations from the text or facts.

The summary of the essay should briefly summarize all of the above and once again clearly express your personal attitude to the issue that was disclosed in the essay.

To write a quality essay download list of works required for reading according to the program 2019 and read not only each of them, but also learn Additional information: facts from the life of the author, the history of writing, key points, used artistic techniques.

Categories of those who pass the exam in literature

Schedule project conducting the exam in 2018 sets the date for the early examination in literature on April 4, and the main stage on June 20.

To surrender USE in 2019 allowed:

• those who were issued in previous years;
• students who receive secondary specialized education;
• receiving the average special education in foreign organizations;
• those who have USE results from previous years.

You have the right to take the exam ahead of schedule:

• students in institutions of a closed type;
• staying in institutions for people with disabilities;
• integrated into places of restriction of freedom;
• completed in full syllabus ahead of schedule;
• having health problems.

How to become a participant in the USE 2019

Institutional graduates 2019 school year and those who study in special vocational schools, as well as NGOs (primary professional education) must register with the administration of their educational institution. To register, you must bring with you an application with the list of planned subjects indicated in it for passing the exam. At the very top of the piece of paper should be the initials of the head of the educational institution (that is, the application must be submitted in his name).

Those who graduated in previous years, who have a document on secondary education, as well as those who received secondary education in institutions of another state, should apply to the city education authorities of their region. To register, you must have the following package of documents with you:

• an application with the list of planned subjects indicated in it for passing the exam;
• identity document (passport, residence permit, military ID);
• education document.

After registering the application, confirmation of your actions must be issued, which will indicate the date of registration and the address where you will need to get a pass for the state exam.

Early delivery of the exam in literature in 2019

The following persons have the full right to take the exam ahead of schedule:

• those who medical indications cannot and do not have the opportunity to be present during the main passing of the state exam, but only after the presentation of a medical certificate;
• who are called ahead of schedule for military service;
• those who will take part in international olympiads, sports competitions and competitions high level in the numbers of passing the main session of the exam.

Early stage of delivery in 2019 started March 21. The Unified State Examination in Literature starts one of the last - April 4th.

It is impossible to say for sure whether there are certain pros or cons early delivery exam. It is carried out under strict control and supervision, everything is set up for the most honest passing of the exam. However educational establishments are forced to work in a stressful mode, and due to the cancellation of classes, students may have difficulties with the implementation of the calendar and thematic plan on one's own.

Additional information about the USE 2019

During the delivery of the exam in literature, it is forbidden to use Additional materials and equipment. If they are discovered reference materials or devices that read/transmit information or other means of communication, the participant's work will be canceled without the possibility of a retake.

In addition, the participant is allowed to take a transparent bottle of water and a pen. All belongings must be left near the entrance to the office. If there is an electronic device turned on in the bag that makes noise while writing the exam, this can serve as a reprimand and further problems. Therefore, it is better to make sure that all means of communication will be turned off and will be in a non-working state.

It is forbidden to turn around, talk to those who are sitting in front or behind. It is forbidden to get up and walk around the office during USE time and distract others. It is forbidden to carry with you substances that can harm and devices that can cause a reaction of the metal detector.

The minimum required for admission to universities was in 2018 32 points. IN total tasks must be completed in 4 hours.

If you did not score a passing score for the exam in literature, then options A little. The retake of subjects that are selected can be carried out only after a year. However, the final results for this exam will not be displayed anywhere, and nothing will indicate a failed exam.

If you receive a significant underscore or fail, you have the right to appeal and get permission to have your results recalculated. But it is important to remember that points can be either added or reduced.

The appeal process consists of the following parts:

• 48 hours after the announcement of the results, you must fill out an application in any form in two copies;
• on one of the forms, the organizer of the exam must stamp and sign, certifying the fact of acceptance of the application for appeal, and give it to the graduate. The second form remains there;
• at the specified time, you need to come to the appeal with an identity document and a pass from the exam. If it is not possible to come, the procedure will be carried out in any case, and the result will be announced later.

The USE certificate in literature may be valid for 4 years. That is, those taking the Literature exam have the right to use the certificate until 2020 inclusive.

How to prepare for the exam 2019 in literature

The following literature guides will help you prepare for the exam on your own and get answers to your questions:

• "Graduation essay. Final certification ”Sigova V.K. - contains all the necessary materials for high-quality preparation for the exam;
• "Unified State Examination. Literature. Typical test tasks "Erokhina E. L. - the manual is proposed for consideration 10 options test items, each of which is based on previous exams.

To get acquainted with the types of tasks and their level of difficulty, you can use demo version for the exam in literature. Demo version of the exam Literature 2019 if you start training not in advance, but 11th grade This will help you get a better idea of ​​the upcoming exam.

Decide on your weaknesses will help passage online tests for the requirements of examination papers. Trial versions of the exam will help you get answers to specific questions and calculate your scores for past years' examples.

The secret to successfully passing the exam in literature is simple - you need to read it in a timely manner necessary material and go to the exam with the confidence that everything necessary knowledge are available. In no case should you be afraid, you should take the exam calmly, carefully reading the assignments and answering them. If the time has not yet ended, and you are determined to hand in the work, you should check the answers again for the presence of typos or elementary errors. You need to believe in yourself and your strengths, not be afraid and be careful. If at first glance the task seems overwhelming to you, return to it after 20 minutes and perhaps then you will remember the answer to the question.

Statistics for passing the exam in literature over the past years

Average test score for the exam in literature in 2016 was 53.6. A in 2017 it increased significantly and amounted to 56.9. The number of people who passed the exam 100 points in 2016 consisted of 457 students, 2017 - 457 people. In 2016 Unified State Examination did not pass the minimum score 5.6% from the total.

Exam Schedule

Early stage passing the exam in literature in 2019 - to be confirmed.

The main stage of passing the exam in literature in 2019 is being specified.

In 2017, I passed the exam in literature with 65 points. On appeal, only one primary score was knocked out, which, when transferred to secondary ones, weighed the same amount. Therefore, in the end, my result was only 66 points, which upset me very much.

This year I am pleased with the change in the assessment criteria, and it seems to me that now it has really become clearer what is expected and wanted from you, because last year they could not tell me at the appeal why it was for me that some points for detailed answers.

my failure

I think many people have come across the stories of people who know literature very well, but wrote the exam very badly. Unfortunately, I also know many such examples, one of which is my own. So now I'm on own experience Let me tell you what could be causing it.

I flunked my Literature exam last year with a 66, which is very low for me considering I set myself a 90+. I went through the entire list of literature, with the exception of a few works that were not directly very important, I carefully sorted everything out, my desk was littered with notebooks with written works and tables and notes made by me on everything that is possible. I felt very confident and knew that I was not going empty-headed. I came across a version with works that I knew well, the topics of the compositions were also successful, but in the end it all ended in my tears and a bad result. Why? Because I have never written a full-fledged sampler and could not keep track of time!

I started writing the essay about 35-40 minutes before the end of the work.a, not rewrite, but write! And since I was in a hurry and worried, realizing in advance that I had already flunked it, I made a bunch of mistakes: in three sentences I wrote the word “history” 7-9 times, and in different meanings, used the same words and phrases, the structure of the text was in my head, but in the end I did not have time to finish the penultimate paragraph and did not write a conclusion at all. When we put down the pens, I began to re-read my work and was horrified, but, unfortunately, it was too late to correct anything.

My friend flunked the exam because she did not understand the assessment criteria well, she also knew the material quite well, studied with a tutor. She took the exam two years ago, and then the criteria were very blurred and evaluated the work much more subjectively than now. In the USE 2018, the criteria were made clearer (you can download the file containing the codifier, specification and demo version - literature from this link), which I hope will benefit those who will take this year.

In general, a fairly large number of people get reduced marks for work due to “actual shortcomings”, “some inaccuracies” and the like, although this is not considered a mistake. Quite a few fail at this: they write Good work without mistakes, and they begin to find fault with them for everything that is possible, just to reduce points. That is why it is best to write a work using the most general phrases and generally accepted opinion about works. Often people begin to paint the answer strongly, and they stumble on the same - they get deductions for speech, factual errors and on appeal they hear only “it is clear that you read and understand, but we cannot raise you, because this is not quite what they are waiting for from you in this reply. One thing pleases - now the wording of the criteria has become much less vague. Mini-conclusion: you need to write not very voluminously, without any special embellishments of speech, and as objectively as possible.

Time and mistakes due to haste

As I already mentioned, I screwed up because I didn’t have time to write an essay. And I didn’t have time because I spent too much time on drafts, and as a result, I rewrote for a very long time.

Do not use drafts to write a whole paper on them. Write on them only the plan and keywords, which you will use, because otherwise you simply won’t have time to write anything, but you need to not only write, but also check!

Plan

How many times was it repeated in school that it is very useful to write a plan? But many still do not like to devote time to him, but he can really speed up the process of writing detailed answers and the essay itself. Although you can do it much easier with detailed answers - just throw in the keywords that you want to use and which help to reveal the topic - and follow them to write a paper.

As for the essay, I think that it is most convenient to first divide it into parts, and write out key words in them too. Then, while writing, the likelihood of repeating the same phrases and words decreases, and a structured thought can be stated quickly and easily.

How much and for what

It is worth constantly keeping a beacon in your head, reminding you that time is not rubber. In our classroom, we were reminded of the time only five minutes before the end of the exam, so it’s best to keep track of this yourself.

I spent a lot of time on detailed answers, which led to a disastrous result. I advise you to spend 5-7 minutes to think over the answer (write down key words / plan, as I wrote above), and then 15-20 minutes to write.

With the test, too, you should not delay, but this, I think, is already clear. Now when I make samples, I first work with the test, and then, just before proceeding with detailed answers, I read an excerpt from prose. Because most often in the test there is nothing at all connected with the passage, only with the work as a whole or with definitions. And if you first read the text, then do the test, then, most likely, for a detailed answer, you will have to re-read it again. With lyrics, I also often do this, first I go through the numbers with terms, and only then, when it is necessary to determine what methods the author used, what size the poem was written in and when answering questions 15.16, I read the poem itself.

The test takes an average of 15-20 minutes. It seems to me that it is more convenient to check after, but then you need to be guaranteed to leave yourself time. It turned out that I just did not immediately transfer everything to the forms, and at the end of the work, during the transfer, I just checked myself again.

Thus, about 100-120 minutes are left for composing and checking. Just 10-15 minutes per plan and you can write calmly, sometimes giving yourself time to think. Because, again, returning to the time of my exam, I wrote almost without thinking because I was in a hurry: I just wrote without stopping, and this obviously turned out to be that I simply did not have time to follow lexical repetitions, actual mistakes and for the construction of the proposal as a whole.

It is best to finish with an essay 20 minutes before the end, in order to have time to re-read everything written. Because it is not immediately possible to check detailed answers best idea. Instead, it would be preferable to switch thoughts to something else, and then re-read it - this way you can better see the mistakes.

What can surprise you in an exam?

When you sit in the audience and look at the form you come across, you may think that this is a little different from what you expected. Let's see why.

Lyrics

You can easily come across poems not from the codifier, as I had, for example. It’s not that it’s more difficult, it’s just that I was tormented by the question for a long time, why then do you need a codifier and selected authors if you can come across a poem not related to them, and for comparison you can cite works not only from the codifier, but in principle from Russian literature of a certain time.

I came across a poem that I saw for the first time, and for comparison I cited Bunin “I remember a long winter evening', and everything was fine with me. However, it was a shame that I learned a lot of poems, and in the end I used the one that I knew by heart from the fifth grade.

Extended answers

Also, the wording of questions for detailed answers may be completely different from those that were in the samplers. Indeed, during training, questions tend to be repeated quite often, but anything can come across in work. But the essence of the question does not depend on the wording! In essence, they are all very monotonous, they simply lend themselves to some kind of “mangling”, just to confuse those taking the exam. So don't panic, just think about what it looks like the most.

For example, a question about the conflict of heroes may come across in the work, but the wording will contain “social-philosophical disputes”, or “confrontation between noble and vile heroes”. Or, in a question about nature, there may be something like “how does the hero compare himself to a cedar?”

It's all very simple, but clarifications can sometimes be confusing. In the end, it's best to reduce everything to common definition, whether it be conflict, emotional experiences, the connection between man and nature, and so on.

test part

Personally, I was also shocked by the task with quotes. Fragments of remarks from the story “Ionych” by A.P. were given. Chekhov, and it was necessary to compare them with the characters who pronounced them. Of course, it was necessary to focus on the characteristics of the characters, but since one quote still had to remain superfluous, and it was not possible to highlight key phrases / features of speech everywhere, I did not cope with this task.

Structure of detailed answers

It is very important to pay attention to speech and to the material that is used in the work.

If there is no absolute certainty that the quote is used correctly and accurately, then it is better not to write it.

If there is no absolute certainty that it was this hero who performed this particular action, then again it is better not to mention it.

If the name of the hero is not well remembered, then it is better to call him the “main character” or simply give his description (whose relative he is, what he looks like, who he is by profession, status, and so on).

You also need to watch for repetition, tautology, speech errors. For example, I accidentally used the word “history” in three different meanings and because of this I wrote it six times in three or four sentences. And I noticed, unfortunately, already when the exam time was over.

Be sure to pay attention to how often you use the names of the characters. The use of synonyms will help you with this: not just Bazarov, but a friend of Arkady Kirsanov, a nihilist; not just Natasha Rostova, but sister, daughter, lover, beloved heroine of Tolstoy (one of) and so on.

It is also necessary to diversify the work with synonyms in the case of verbs. You should not use only “the author described” and “the author showed”, there are a lot of words that can replace such formulations, and somewhere it’s better to build a sentence differently, otherwise it turns out very monotonous and ugly.

Your opinion

This, of course, is very sad, but in no case should you write your own opinion. As I have written several times, it is best to reduce everything to objectivity.

On the exam, no one cares what you think about certain topics. Checkers need to see your knowledge of theory and material. Therefore, you can’t use any “I think”, “I think”, “In my opinion”, and so on, which, on the contrary, they teach us when preparing for the Unified State Examination in Russian. Therefore, summing up such an intermediate result, I advise you to refresh the structure in your memory from time to time spellings and criteria for long answers.

I hope my advice will help you avoid my mistakes and write the exam in literature for a good score. The main thing is to always remember about the time and that none of the reviewers are interested in seeing your excellent writing skills. There are criteria - you need to meet them. You should not think that passing the exam is good - the goal is sky-high and impossible, you just need to know which side is better to approach it. Take your time, learn the clichés and don't be scared if you suddenly receive a form that asks for an analysis of the works that you see for the first time.

About the exam

The total number of examinees in 2018 was more than 49 thousand people, which is higher than in 2017 and 2016. These data indicate a certain stability in the choice of the USE in literature by graduates entering universities of the corresponding profile.

The average test score in 2018 was 61.4, slightly higher than in 2017 (59.6) and 2016 (57.9).

The most numerous are the groups of examinees who received 41-60 and 61-80 TB. (32% and 43% of participants, respectively). The group of high scorers makes up about 15% of total number participants.

In comparison with 2017, in 2018 the share of examinees with results in the range of low (21–40) and medium (41–60) points decreased. The trend towards an increase in the proportion of well-trained participants with results of 61–80 t.b. (an increase of 3%), which, in particular, is associated with a trend towards improving the quality of teaching the subject "Literature" in the context of the introduction of the final essay.

The minimum primary score of the USE in 2018 was 15 p.b. The share of graduates who did not score the minimum number of points in 2018 is 5.2%.

Analysis USE results 2018 confirms the preservation of the measuring properties of the examination model and allows us to state that the degree of complexity of the KIM tasks is generally adequate to the cognitive capabilities of the examinees and makes it possible to differentiate them for admission to universities with different requirements for the level of preparation in literature.

More detailed analytical and methodological USE materials 2018 are available at the link.

Our website contains about 1600 assignments for preparing for the exam in literature in 2018. Overall plan examination paper is presented below.

PLAN OF THE EXAMINATION WORK OF THE USE IN LITERATURE 2019

Designation of the level of difficulty of the task: B - basic, P - advanced, C - high.

Correspondence between the minimum primary scores and the minimum test scores of 2018. Order on amendments to Appendix No. 2 to the order Federal Service on supervision in the field of education and science. .

OFFICIAL SCALE 2019

THRESHOLD SCORE
The order of Rosobrnadzor established the minimum number of points, confirming the mastery of the participants in the exams of the main general educational programs medium (full) general education in accordance with the requirements of the federal state educational standard secondary (complete) general education. LITERATURE THRESHOLD: 15 primary scores(32 test points).

EXAM FORMS
Download forms in high quality you can follow the link.

WHAT YOU CAN BRING WITH YOU TO THE EXAM

This exam does not require the use of additional equipment and materials.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

"The Tale of Igor's Campaign".

1. D. I. Fonvizin. The play "Undergrowth".


2. G. R. Derzhavin. The poem "Monument".

1. V. A. Zhukovsky. The poem "Sea", the ballad "Svetlana".


2. A. S. Griboyedov. The play "Woe from Wit".


3. A. S. Pushkin. Poems:"Village", "Prisoner", "In the depths of Siberian ores ...", "Poet", "To Chaadaev", "Song of prophetic Oleg”, “To the sea”, “Nanny”, “K ***” (“I remember wonderful moment…"), "19. October "(" The forest drops its crimson dress ... ")," Prophet "," Winter road”,“ Anchar ”,“ Night haze lies on the hills of Georgia ... ”,“ I loved you: love is still, perhaps ... ”,“ Winter morning”, “Demons”, “Conversation of a bookseller with a poet”, “Cloud”, “I erected a monument to myself not made by hands ...”, “The daylight went out ...”, “Freedom sower of the desert ...”, “Imitations of the Koran” (IX. “And the traveler tired grumbled at God…”) “Elegy”, (“Crazy years of extinct fun…”), “…I visited again…”. Novels « Captain's daughter and Eugene Onegin. Poem"Bronze Horseman".


4. M. Yu. Lermontov. Poems:“No, I’m not Byron, I’m different ...”, “Clouds”, “Beggar”, “From under the mysterious, cold half-mask ...”, “Sail”, “Death of the Poet”, “Borodino”, “When the yellowing field is agitated ... ”, “Duma”, “Poet” (“My dagger shines with a golden finish ...”), “Three palm trees”, “Prayer” (“In a difficult moment of life ...”), “And boring and sad”, “No, not you I love so passionately…”, “Motherland”, “Dream” (“In the midday heat in the valley of Dagestan…”), “Prophet”, “As often, surrounded by a motley crowd…”, “Valerik”, “I go out alone on the road ... ". poems"Song about ... the merchant Kalashnikov" and "Mtsyri". Novel"Hero of our time".


5. N. V. Gogol. The play "Inspector". The story "Overcoat". Poem "Dead Souls"

1. A. N. Ostrovsky. The play "Thunderstorm".


2. I. S. Turgenev. The novel "Fathers and Sons".


3. F. I. Tyutchev. Poems: “Noon”, “There is melodiousness in sea ​​waves…”, “A kite has risen from a clearing…”, “There is in the initial autumn…”, “Silentium!”, “Not what you think, nature…”, “You can’t understand Russia with your mind…”, “Oh, how we love deadly...”, “We are not given to predict...”, “K. B." (“I met you - and all the past ...”), “Nature is a sphinx. And the more she returns ... ".


4. A. A. Fet. Poems: “The dawn says goodbye to the earth ...”, “With one push to drive away the living boat ...”, “Evening”, “Learn from them - from the oak, from the birch ...”, “This morning, this joy ...”, “Whisper, timid breathing…”, “The night shone. The garden was full of moonlight. They lay ... "," Another May night ".


5. I. A. Goncharov. Roman Oblomov.


6. N. A. Nekrasov. Poems:“Troika”, “I don’t like your irony ...”, “Railway”, “On the road”, “Yesterday, at six o’clock ...”, “We are stupid people ...”, “Poet and Citizen "," Elegy "(" Let the changeable fashion tell us ... ")," O Muse! I am at the door of the coffin ... ". Poem"To whom in Rus' it is good to live."


7. M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Fairy tales:"The Tale of How One Man Feeded Two Generals", " wild landlord», « wise scribbler». Novel"History of one city" (survey study).


8. L. N. Tolstoy. The novel "War and Peace".


9. F. M. Dostoevsky. The novel Crime and Punishment.


10. N. S. Leskov. One work (at the choice of the examinee).

A.P. Chekhov. Stories:"Student", "Ionych", "Man in a Case", "Lady with a Dog", "Death of an Official", "Chameleon". Play"The Cherry Orchard".

1. I. A. Bunin. Stories: "The Gentleman from San Francisco", "Clean Monday".


2. M. Gorky. The story "Old Woman Izergil", the play "At the bottom".


3. A. A. Blok. Poems:"Stranger", "Russia", "Night, street, lamp, pharmacy ...", "In a restaurant", "The river spread. It flows, lazily sad ... ”(from the cycle“ On the Kulikovo Field ”),“ On railway”, “I enter dark temples ...”, “Factory”, “Rus”, “About valor, about exploits, about glory ...”, “Oh, I want to live crazy ...”, poem"Twelve".


4. V. V. Mayakovsky. Poems:“Could you?”, “Listen!”, “Violin and a little nervously”, “Lilichka!”, “Anniversary”, “Happy”, “Nate!”, “ Good attitude to the horses”, “An extraordinary adventure with Vladimir Mayakovsky in the summer at the dacha”, “Giveaway”, “Letter to Tatiana Yakovleva”. Poem"A cloud in pants".


5. S. A. Yesenin. Poems:“Goy you, Rus', my dear! ..”, “Do not wander, do not crush in the crimson bushes ...”, “Now we are leaving little by little ...”, “A letter to mother”, “The feather grass is sleeping. Dear plain…”, “You are my Shagane, Shagane…”, “I don’t regret, I don’t call, I don’t cry…”, “Soviet Rus'”, “The road thought about the red evening…”, “Hewn drogs sang…”, “Rus” , "Pushkin", "I'm going through the valley. On the back of the head is a cap ... "," A low house with blue shutters ... ".


6. M. I. Tsvetaeva. Poems:“To my poems written so early…”, “Poems to Blok” (“ Your name- a bird in the hand…”), “Who is made of stone, who is made of clay…”, “Longing for the motherland! For a long time ... ”,“ Books in red binding ”,“ Grandmother ”,“ Seven hills - like seven bells! .. ”(from the cycle“ Poems about Moscow ”).


7. O. E. Mandelstam. Poems:"Notre Dame", "Insomnia. Homer. Tight sails…”, “For the explosive prowess of the coming centuries…”, “I returned to my city, familiar to tears…”.


8. A. A. Akhmatova. Poems:"Song last meeting”,“ I clenched my hands under a dark veil ... ”,“ I don’t need odic rati ... ”,“ I had a voice. He called consolingly…”, “ Motherland”, “Tearful autumn, like a widow ...”, “Primorsky sonnet”, “There are such days before spring ...”, “I am not with those who left the earth ...”, “Poems about St. Petersburg”, “ Courage". Poem"Requiem".


9. M. A. Sholokhov. Novel " Quiet Don”, the story “The fate of man”.


10. M. A. Bulgakov. Novel " white guard"(the choice is allowed), the novel "The Master and Margarita" (the choice is allowed).


11. A. T. Tvardovsky. Poems:“The whole point is in one single covenant…”, “In memory of the mother” (“In the land where they were taken in a herd…”), “I know, no fault of mine…”. Poem"Vasily Terkin" (chapters "Crossing", "Two Soldiers", "Duel", "Death and the Warrior").


12. B. L. Pasternak. Poems:"February. Get ink and cry!..”, “Definition of poetry”, “In everything I want to reach…”, “Hamlet”, “ Winter night"(" It's snowy, it's snowy all over the earth ... ")," There will be no one in the house ... "," It is snowing”, “About these verses”, “To love others is a heavy cross ...”, “Pines”, “Hoarfrost”, “July”. Novel"Doctor Zhivago" (survey study with analysis of fragments).


13. A.P. Platonov. One work (at the choice of the examinee).


14. A. I. Solzhenitsyn. Story " Matrenin yard”, “One day of Ivan Denisovich”.

The exam in literature in 2018 is an elective subject. Not every graduate chooses this exam - basically, only those guys who in the future want to connect their lives with philology, linguistics, journalism and others humanities where knowledge of the literature is required. The complexity of this exam is due to the fact that the student needs to read a large number of works of Russian literature, both lyrical (poetic) and prose.

By no means all the guys have time to master such a volume of information in a year, since a meaningful reading of large novels takes an extremely long time. Therefore, in order to successfully pass the exam in literature in the 11th grade, it is necessary to start preparing in a timely manner - preferably not in a year, but at least from the 10th grade, while regularly referring to the theoretical base and returning to previously read works.

It is for this reason that it is more expedient to sign up for our specialists. In our training center "Godograph" we practice individual and group activities for 3-4 people, we provide discounts for training. Our students average 30 points more!

You can also sign up for. We have developed a preparation strategy in which students do not forget the material at the USE itself and do not get lost at the sight of a new wording of the question.

Let's take a closer look at what the USE in literature is in 2018.

The structure of the exam in literature

The examination paper in literature consists of two parts and includes 17 tasks. Part 1 includes two blocks of tasks. The first block of tasks refers to a fragment of an epic, or lyrical epic, or dramatic work: seven tasks with a short answer (1–7) and two tasks with a detailed answer in the amount of 5–10 sentences (8, 9).

The second block of tasks relates to the analysis lyrical work: five tasks with a short answer (10–14) and two tasks with a detailed answer in the amount of 5–10 sentences (15, 16). Answers to tasks 1-7 and 10-14 are written either in the form of a word, or a phrase, or a sequence of numbers. The answer must be written without spaces, commas and other additional characters.

Part 2 includes 3 tasks (17.1–17.3), from which you need to choose only one and give a detailed reasoned answer to it in the genre of writing on literary theme no less than 200 words.

3 hours 55 minutes (235 minutes) are given to complete the entire work. It is recommended to allocate no more than 2 hours to complete the tasks of part 1, and the rest of the time to complete the task of part 2.

Demonstration version of the exam in literature

The demo version allows you to get acquainted with the structure of the exam and the approximate wording of tasks. In addition, the demo version provides assessment criteria - without them it is difficult to understand how to write essays in both parts of the exam paper. You can also look different variants in training collections, various manuals, as well as on the websites of FIPI, “I will solve the exam”.

Topics in Literature USE 2018

A list of topics on the history and theory of literature, as well as a list of works whose knowledge will be tested in the exam, are presented in USE codifier in Literature 2018, which is published on the FIPI website. It includes the main works of Russian literature from school curriculum, beginning with ancient Russian literature and ending with the literature of the second half of the 20th century. Please note that the USE in Literature includes only RUSSIAN literature, not foreign literature. And when completing tasks for comparing works, you also need to take examples from RUSSIAN literature.

Many people ask themselves the question: is it possible to know in advance the exact wording of the topics of the essays that will be in examination work? Unfortunately, no, this information is not disclosed, and students receive essay topics only on the day of the exam. It remains only to look and solve typical options and tasks of past years in order to get an idea of ​​​​the possible topics.

Possible USE topics in literature 2018 task 8

* Which of the heroes wins this "duel"? (Justify your answer.)

* How the statements and behavior of the characters in this fragment help to understand the essence of their characters?

* Why can the scene described in the fragment be called tragicomic?

* What features of Nekrasov's women were embodied in the image of the heroine-narrator?

Sample USE topics in literature 2018 task 9

* In what works of Russian writers are the life and customs of the townsfolk depicted, and in what ways are these works consonant with Chekhov's Ionych?

* In what works of Russian literature are the relationships between the powerful and the subordinate shown, and in what way can these works be compared with the play by A. N. Ostrovsky "Thunderstorm"?

* In what works of Russian literature are pictures depicted peasant life and in what ways can these works be compared with Oblomov?

* In what works of Russian literature are vivid female characters depicted and in what way can they be compared with the character of the Nekrasov heroine?

USE topics in literature assignment 15

* As different poetic devices help the author to convey the feelings embracing lyrical hero?

* How do the words “inspiration is not for sale, but you can sell a manuscript” correlate with the general content of the conversation between the poet and the bookseller?

* What role in disclosure main idea poems plays the image of rain?

* How do the final lines meaningfully relate to the main part of the poem?

Sample USE topics in literature 2018 task 16

* What is the peculiarity of the depiction of human feelings in the lyrics of F.I. Tyutchev and what Russian poets can be called his followers?

* What are the features of the poetic solution of the theme of love by Fet and in what poems of Russian poets are the same features found?

* In what works of the national love lyrics there are pictures of nature and in what way can these works be compared with the poem of A. A. Tarkovsky?

Possible USE topics in literature 2018 task 17

* What internally unites the "fathers of the city" and the landlords in N. V. Gogol's poem "Dead Souls"?

* How do the theme of love and the theme of conscience echo in A. N. Ostrovsky's drama "Thunderstorm"?

* How is the finale of A. A. Blok's poem "The Twelve" connected with its main content?

* What is the originality of the sound patriotic theme in the lyrics of M. Yu. Lermontov?

* What is the role of the epilogue in F. M. Dostoevsky's novel "Crime and Punishment"?

* How does the prose of I. A. Bunin reveal the theme of the earthly and the eternal?

USE tests in literature

IN typical tasks Unified State Examination in Literature, i.e. Short answer tasks may require the student to:

* indicate the literary trend / direction in which the given work was written (classicism, sentimentalism, romanticism, realism, modernism, symbolism, acmeism, futurism, postmodernism), or its genre (novel, epic novel, story, short story, essay, parable; poem, ballad; lyric poem, song, elegy, message, epigram, ode, sonnet; comedy, tragedy, drama)

* demonstrate mastery of theoretical and literary concepts and terms;

* show knowledge artistic means and techniques (rhetorical question, exclamation, aphorism, inversion, repetition, anaphora, comparison, epithet, metaphor, personification, metonymy, hyperbole, allegory, oxymoron, sound writing: alliteration, assonance);

* apply knowledge of the system of syllabo-tonic versification (trochee, iambic, dactyl, amphibrach, anapaest);

* demonstrate possession of facts from the history of literature;

* show knowledge of the content of the work, its characters and their characteristics, the main storyline, as well as other works of literature within the framework of this creative method.

This is not an exhaustive list exemplary assignments, however, it is possible and necessary to focus on it.

So, having familiarized yourself with the structure of the exam in literature, you can safely decide whether or not to pass the exam in literature in 2018. The most important advice: read more, write essays, practice and you will be able to solve the exam in literature 2018 without difficulty!